f19fdd47a6 test: add test for CChainState::ResizeCoinsCaches() (James O'Beirne)
8ac3ef4699 add ChainstateManager::MaybeRebalanceCaches() (James O'Beirne)
f36aaa6392 Add CChainState::ResizeCoinsCaches (James O'Beirne)
b223111da2 txdb: add CCoinsViewDB::ChangeCacheSize (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the [assumeutxo project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11):
Parent PR: #15606
Issue: #15605
Specification: https://github.com/jamesob/assumeutxo-docs/tree/master/proposal
---
In the assumeutxo implementation draft (#15056), once a UTXO snapshot is loaded, a new chainstate object is created after initialization. This means that we have to reclaim some of the cache that we've allocated to the original chainstate (per `dbcache=`) to repurpose for the snapshot chainstate.
Furthermore, it makes sense to have different cache allocations depending on which chainstate is more active. While the snapshot chainstate is working to get to the network tip (and the background validation chainstate is idle), it makes sense that the snapshot chainstate should have the majority of cache allocation. And contrariwise once the snapshot has reached network tip, most of the cache should be given to the background validation chainstate.
This set of changes (detailed in the commit messages) allows us to dynamically resize the various coins caches. None of the functionality introduced here is used at the moment, but will be in the next AU PR (which introduces `ActivateSnapshot`).
`ChainstateManager::MaybeRebalanceCaches()` defines the (somewhat normative) cache allocations between the snapshot and background validation chainstates. I'd be interested in feedback if anyone has thoughts on the proportions I've set there.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
weak utACK f19fdd47a6 -- didn't find any major problems, but not super confident that I didn't miss anything
fjahr:
Code review ACK f19fdd4
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK f19fdd47a6. Only change since last review is constructor cleanup (no change in behavior). I think the suggestions here from ajtowns and others are good, but shouldn't delay merging the PR (and hold up assumeutxo)
Tree-SHA512: fffb7847fb6993dd4a1a41cf11179b211b0b20b7eb5f7cf6266442136bfe9d43b830bbefcafd475bfd4af273f5573500594aa41fff03e0ed5c2a1e8562ff9269
Also adds CCoinsViewCache::ReallocateCache() to attempt to free
memory that the cacheCoins's allocator may be hanging onto when
downsizing the cache.
Adds `CChainState::m_coins{tip,db}_cache_size_bytes` data members
so that we can reference cache size on a per-chainstate basis for
flushing.
faec3dc2ad init: Remove boost from ThreadImport (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Can be tested by calling `-reindex` or `-loadblock` and then pressing `CTRL`+`C`.
Should print something like:
```
...
2020-04-27T19:34:31Z [loadblk] Reindexing block file blk00005.dat...
^C2020-04-27T19:34:32Z [loadblk] Shutdown requested. Exit ThreadImport
2020-04-27T19:34:32Z [qt-init] Interrupting HTTP server
...
```
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK faec3dc2ad
hebasto:
ACK faec3dc2ad, tested on Linux Mint 19.3 (x86_64) both `bitcoind` and `bitcoin-qt` binaries.
Tree-SHA512: e105af18d98296d82ec99f48e478cf44577e3c32f7e4b47617a7bc7cbf71d6becb92722f229a1be38d58ad29712704509ad9740d8ab8cd3104cf90057664b437
Per BIP 141, the witness commitment structure is atleast 38 bytes,
OP_RETURN (0x6a) + 36 (0x24) + 4 byte header (0xaa21a9ed) + 32 byte
SHA256 hash. It can be longer, however any additional data has no
consensus meaning.
I'd previously attempted to create a specialized lock for ChainstateManager,
but it turns out that because that lock would be required for functions like
ChainActive() and ChainstateActive(), it created irreconcilable lock inversions
since those functions are used so broadly throughout the codebase.
Instead, I'm just using cs_main to protect the contents of g_chainman.
Co-authored-by: Russell Yanofsky <russ@yanofsky.org>
ChainstateManager is responsible for creating and managing multiple
chainstates, and will provide a high-level interface for accessing the
appropriate chainstate based upon a certain use.
Incorporates feedback from Marco Falke. Additional documentation written
by Russ Yanofsky.
Co-authored-by: Russell Yanofsky <russ@yanofsky.org>
This parameter is unused, but in future commits will allow ChainstateManager to
differentiate between chainstates created from a UTXO snapshot from those that
weren't.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
# Delete outdated alias for RecursiveMutex
sed -i -e '/CCriticalSection/d' ./src/sync.h
# Replace use of outdated alias with RecursiveMutex
sed -i -e 's/CCriticalSection/RecursiveMutex/g' $(git grep -l CCriticalSection)
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
This separates out some logic for detecting how full the coins cache is from
FlushStateToDisk. We'll want to reuse this logic when deciding when to flush
the coins cache during UTXO snapshot activation.
Commit d449772cf6 stopped setting
COINBASE_FLAGS, and it looks like it hasn't been used since P2SH.
Update the help string to remove "flags", which is not specified in
BIP 22.
5506ecfe7a [refactor] Replace global int nScriptCheckThreads with bool (John Newbery)
d9957623b4 [tests] Don't use TestingSetup in the checkqueue_tests (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
The meaning of this value is confusing. Refactor it and add comments.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
ACK 5506ecfe7a
promag:
ACK 5506ecfe7a, only change was addressing my nits.
laanwj:
Code review ACK 5506ecfe7a
MarcoFalke:
ACK 5506ecfe7a🥐
Tree-SHA512: 78536727c98d2c23f3c0f3f169131474fef9a4486ae65029011caf06eab30f6f70ff73a65b2fb04a5d969fc1150858d1c6ea4767f04d48c1eea6b829316d0e63
The global nScriptCheckThreads int is confusing and is only needed for
its int-ness in AppInitMain. Move all `-par` parsing logic there and
replace the int nScriptCheckThreads with a bool
g_parallel_script_checks.
Also tidy up logic and improve comments.
92b2f5306b test: add dumptxoutset RPC test (James O'Beirne)
c1ccbc3dde devtools: add utxo_snapshot.sh (James O'Beirne)
57cf74c991 rpc: add dumptxoutset (James O'Beirne)
92fafb3a7d coinstats: add coins_count (James O'Beirne)
707fde7b9b add unused SnapshotMetadata class (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the [assumeutxo project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11):
Parent PR: #15606
Issue: #15605
Specification: https://github.com/jamesob/assumeutxo-docs/tree/master/proposal
---
This changeset defines the serialization format for UTXO snapshots and adds an RPC command for creating them, `dumptxoutset`. It also adds a convenience script for generating and verifying snapshots at a certain height, since that requires doing a hacky rewind of the chain via `invalidateblock`.
All of this is unused at the moment.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 92b2f5306b
Tree-SHA512: 200dff87767f157d627e99506ec543465d9329860a6cd49363081619c437163a640a46d008faa92b1f44fd403bfc7a7c9e851c658b5a4849efa9a34ca976bf31
9075d13153 [docs] Add release notes for removal of REJECT reasons (John Newbery)
04a2f326ec [validation] Fix REJECT message comments (John Newbery)
e9d5a59e34 [validation] Remove REJECT code from CValidationState (John Newbery)
0053e16714 [logging] Don't log REJECT code when transaction is rejected (John Newbery)
a1a07cfe99 [validation] Fix peer punishment for bad blocks (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
We no longer send BIP 61 REJECT messages, so there's no need to set
a REJECT code in the CValidationState object.
Note that there is a minor bug fix in p2p behaviour here. Because the
call to `MaybePunishNode()` in `PeerLogicValidation::BlockChecked()` only
previously happened if the REJECT code was > 0 and < `REJECT_INTERNAL`,
then there are cases were `MaybePunishNode()` can get called where it
wasn't previously:
- when `AcceptBlockHeader()` fails with `CACHED_INVALID`.
- when `AcceptBlockHeader()` fails with `BLOCK_MISSING_PREV`.
Note that `BlockChecked()` cannot fail with an 'internal' reject code. The
only internal reject code was `REJECT_HIGHFEE`, which was only set in
ATMP.
This reverts a minor bug introduced in 5d08c9c579.
ACKs for top commit:
ariard:
ACK 9075d13, changes since last reviewed are splitting them in separate commits to ease understanding and fix nits
fjahr:
ACK 9075d13153, confirmed diff to last review was fixing nits in docs/comments.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 9075d13153. Only changes since last review are splitting the main commit and updating comments
Tree-SHA512: 58e8a1a4d4e6f156da5d29fb6ad6a62fc9c594bbfc6432b3252e962d0e9e10149bf3035185dc5320c46c09f3e49662bc2973ec759679c0f3412232087cb8a3a7
