fab6d6b2d1 Move pindexBestInvalid to ChainstateManager (MarcoFalke)
facd2137ec Move m_failed_blocks to ChainstateManager (MarcoFalke)
fa47b5c100 Move AcceptBlockHeader to ChainstateManager (MarcoFalke)
fa3d62cf7b Move FindForkInGlobalIndex from BlockManager to CChainState (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Move globals or members of the wrong class to the right class.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK fab6d6b2d1
Sjors:
ACK fab6d6b2d1
shaavan:
ACK fab6d6b2d1
Tree-SHA512: 926cbdfa22838517497bacb79ed5f521f64117c2aacf96a0176f62831b4713314a32abc0213df5ee067edf63e4a4300f752a26006d36e5aab415bb91209a271f
261dddb924 test: Combine addr generation helper functions (Martin Zumsande)
aeeccd9aa6 test: Fix intermittent issue in p2p_addr_relay.py (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
Fixes#22449 by increasing the mocktime jump (just as in 6168eb06b2), which prevents failures due to rare Poisson timer events, or at least makes them a lot more unlikely.
The second commit combines the addr generation helper functions `setup_addr_msg` and `setup_rand_addr_msg`. It also changes the way `addr.time` is filled to random, because before, if too many addresses (>600) were created in a batch, they would stop being relayed because their timestamp would be too far in the future.
ACKs for top commit:
josibake:
reACK 261dddb924
jnewbery:
utACK 261dddb924
Tree-SHA512: d0eca887de4bc85092730284cf612193d2c12b0a3d624a2bfa5fef4a5890d3b6375c564333c5927425958e4b6ec86b8854b18b2233c7b6f1691d9ddc397948a9
This combines the addr generation helper functions setup_addr_msg
and setup_rand_addr_msg.
It also changes the way addr.time is filled to random, because before,
if too many addresses (>600) were created in a batch, they would stop
being relayed because their timestamp would be too far in the future.
65efbba45d rpcwallet: mention labels are deactivated for ranged descriptors (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
It was confusing when trying to use it as a blackbox. So mention it so next ones don't have to open the said box :)
See #23749 for context
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
utACK 65efbba45d
achow101:
ACK 65efbba45d
Tree-SHA512: d8a3d1f81c16d95855ac2b01e8fd20e83d6dac1721b3da464a9a890e46102992a6882918be87b2a28b929349ee7f1beb1af6c88b22f065fbbb6948275a6d2b8f
62fa61fa4a refactor: remove the wallet folder if the restore fails (w0xlt)
abbb7eccef refactor: Move restorewallet() RPC logic to the wallet section (w0xlt)
4807f73f48 refactor: Implement restorewallet() logic in the wallet section (w0xlt)
Pull request description:
Currently `restorewallet()` logic is written in the RPC layer and it can´t be reused by GUI. So it moves this to the wallet section and then, GUI can access it.
This is necessary to implement the "Restore Wallet" menu item in the GUI (which is already implemented in https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/471 ).
This commit also simplifies error handling and adds a new behavior: if the restore fails, the invalid wallet folder is removed.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 62fa61fa4a
shaavan:
crACK 62fa61fa4a
Tree-SHA512: 7ccfbad5943f38616ba0c2dd443c97a4b5bc1f6612dbf5a9e7a0263100aba36671fae929a2e7688442667be394645f44484af137a4802f204a33c4689eb27c39
618f4d2890 test: re-organized array according to order of logs and included 2 more interruption events (seaona)
71115a5e23 test: include two more interruptions points (seaona)
Pull request description:
This PR aims to introduce 2 more interruption points in the process of initialization, in order to make the` feature_init `testcase more complete. These are the following:
-` Checking all blk files are present`
-` init message: Starting network threads`
It is a small improvement for increasing the coverage of potential interruptions, and making sure that the node can restart successfully after these interruptions.
ACKs for top commit:
jamesob:
ACK 618f4d2890, pending CI
jarolrod:
ACK 618f4d2890
Tree-SHA512: 9d709734e298e955709094bb97478ca7f18859874f1ba026f7c9014d87205aea63f6cf2093ebee600eaf82d3245adb11e77fae24a1ae48b69efefd57f3def921
66a20a54a2 build, qt: Drop support for `i686-linux-android` host (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
There are no reasons to keep support for `i686-linux-android` host, which is actually broken in master (50c502f54a), and this fact has been unnoticed for months :)
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23675#issuecomment-986206434:
> I'm surprised `i686-linux-android` ABI is still supported. I would love to drop it...
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23675#issuecomment-991340132
> What is `i686-linux-android`? 32-bit x86 android? is that really a thing?
ACKs for top commit:
prusnak:
utACK 66a20a54a2
Tree-SHA512: 211f794de2fc569f0ade2a4da805b8bfd4ce2ab0930c5d427acc4f5d015fcdc4911f02fc64f6401197f7641aed79944a9594be80c817547be3269cdd721cf79b
The member is unrelated to block storage (BlockManager). It is related
to validation.
Fix the confusion by moving it.
Can be reviewed with
--color-moved=dimmed-zebra --color-moved-ws=ignore-all-space
The helper was moved in commit b026e318c3,
which also mentioned that it could be moved to CChainState. So do that,
as the functionality is not block-storage related.
This also allows to drop one function argument.
faf2614f60 style: Use 4 spaces for indendation, not 5 (MarcoFalke)
fada66fc2c Disallow copies of CChain (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Creating a copy of the chain is not a valid use case in normal operation. Also, it massively degrades performance.
However, it seems to be a mistake that no one looks out for during review:
* https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22677#discussion_r760400537
Fix this by disallowing it.
ACKs for top commit:
jamesob:
ACK faf2614f60 ([`jamesob/ackr/23769.1.MarcoFalke.disallow_copies_of_cchai`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/23769.1.MarcoFalke.disallow_copies_of_cchai))
glozow:
utACK faf2614f60, nice.
prusnak:
utACK faf2614
Tree-SHA512: 27b908c78842e4700e118adb876c09c3d1ec04662310e983309e2cd6fa8ad38c9359ff45f36a804359b9f117e351c4739e651b3e6754c14e6c6fcd7ae5e68342
71d33380ed qt: prevent negative values of progressPerHour (HiLivin)
Pull request description:
Added a similar guard to _progressPerHour_ as is placed at _remainingMSecs_.
It prevents the display of negative values like "-0.00%" in some cases.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 71d33380ed
jarolrod:
ACK 71d3338
shaavan:
reACK 71d33380ed
Tree-SHA512: 5427cdf4441b542196008034355ea00a075adf8b9aeeb383bacdb4e5fbda23d665448a50035aac93cbf401d5d6211d39a2c7c294568d9f5548a5c7579e201c44
fad943821e scripted-diff: Rename touched member variables (MarcoFalke)
fa663a4c0d Use mockable time for peer connection time (MarcoFalke)
fad7ead146 refactor: Use type-safe std::chrono in net (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Benefits:
* Type-safe
* Mockable
* Allows to revert a temporary test workaround
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK fad943821e
shaavan:
ACK fad943821e
Tree-SHA512: af9bdfc695ab727b100c6810a7289d29b02b0ea9fa4fee9cc1f3eeefb52c8c465ea2734bae0c1c63b3b0d6264ba2c493268bc970ef6916570eb166de77829d82
faa6c3d44c net: Drop only invalid entries when reading banlist.json (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
All entries will be dropped when there is at least one invalid one in `banlist.json`. Fix this by only dropping invalid ones.
Also suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20966#issuecomment-861150204
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Re-ACK faa6c3d44c
Tree-SHA512: 5a58e7f1dcabf78d0c65d8c6d5d997063af1efeaa50ca7730fc00056fda7e0061b6f7a38907ea045fe667c9f61d392e01e556b425a95e6b126e3c41cd33deb83
27f353d8ef build, android: Fix Android GUI not loading on Qt 5.15 (Igor Cota)
6fc5c772d4 build, qt: use static QAndroidPlatformIntegrationPlugin (Igor Cota)
Pull request description:
PR moved from https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/504 as it escaped the confines of `src/qt`.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK 27f353d8ef
promag:
utACK 27f353d8ef
Tree-SHA512: 4b6e6b2fb1923b89934f11caa8c05c6f340881689273f0c08916144e623f03fd5b781f1a53af83f6e87dce211fe02a1cb87e5943d13811c791cc8aa458184d9f
2283b9cd1e test: add tests for LoadBlockIndex when using multiple chainstates (James O'Beirne)
0fd599a51a validation: have LoadBlockIndex account for snapshot use (James O'Beirne)
d0c6e61f5d validation: don't modify genesis during snapshot load (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the [assumeutxo project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11) (parent PR: #15606)
---
Currently, `BlockManager::LoadBlockIndex` adds all blocks that have downloaded transactions to the active chain state's `setBlockIndexCandidates` set, ignoring the background chain state.
This PR changes ChainstateManager::LoadBlockIndex to update `setBlockIndexCandidates` in the background chain, not just the active chain. In the active chain, the same blocks are added as before. In the background chain, only blocks that have actually been validated, not blocks marked assumed-valid are added so the background chain will continue to download and validate assumed-valid blocks.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
Concept ACK 2283b9cd1e🤽
Sjors:
utACK 2283b9cd1e
Tree-SHA512: 7c9a80802df4722d85d12b78d2e7f628ac5f11cb8be66913d5c3230339bd1220c6723805509d4460826a17d1dc04b0ae172eb7d09ac0ea5dc5e41d77975cbd5e
fa5865a9e3 Reduce size of strencodings decode tables (MarcoFalke)
fad6761cf7 Fix implicit integer sign changes in strencodings (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This removes casts where they are nonsensical (ToUpper/ToLower) and adds them where needed. Then, remove the suppressions.
Also, reduce static memory usage.
ACKs for top commit:
shaavan:
crACK fa5865a9e3
Tree-SHA512: 29850fb616789befad17f71731f322b2238e94ec431cda293629de540f7ab02060a9fc5b7666168ca2592048df5a39a2975177f47771d4d8211d90321052549d
caac999ff0 refactor: remove dependence on AddrManTest (josibake)
f961c477b5 refactor: check Good() in tried_collisions test (josibake)
207f1c825c refactor: make AddrMan::Good return bool (josibake)
Pull request description:
Previously, the `addrman_tried_collisions` test behaved in the following way:
1. add an address to addrman
2. attempt to move the new address to the tried table (using `AddrMan.Good()`)
3. verify that `num_addrs` matched `size()` to check for collisions in the new table
`AddrMan.size()`, however, returns the number of unique address in addrman, regardless of whether they are in new or tried. This means the test would still pass for addresses where a collision did occur in the tried table. After 3 collisions in the tried table, there would eventually be a collision in the new table when trying to add a new address, which was then detected by checking `num_addrs - collisions == size()`.
While the collision in the new table was caused by a collision in the tried table, the test is misleading as it's not directly testing for collisions in the tried table and misses 3 collisions before identifying a collision in the new table.
### solution
To more directly test the tried table, I refactored `AddrMan::Good()` to return a boolean after successfully adding an address to the tried table. This makes the test much cleaner by first adding an address to new, calling `Good` to move it to the tried table, and checking if it was successful or not. It is worth noting there are other reasons, aside from collisions, which will cause `Good` to return false. That being said, this is an improvement over the previous testing methodology.
Additionally, having `Good()` return a boolean is useful outside of testing as it allows the caller to handle the case where `Good` is unable to move the entry to the tried table (e.g a063647413/src/rpc/net.cpp (L945)).
### followup
As a follow up to this PR, I plan to look at the following places `Good()` is called and see if it makes sense to handle the case where it is unable to add an entry to tried:
* a063647413/src/rpc/net.cpp (L945)
* a063647413/src/net.cpp (L2067)
* a063647413/src/net_processing.cpp (L2708)
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK caac999ff0
mzumsande:
Code review ACK caac999ff0
Tree-SHA512: f328896b1f095e8d2581fcdbddce46fc0491731a0440c6fff01081fa5696cfb896dbbe1d183eda2c100f19aa111e1f8b096ef93582197edc6b791de563a58f99
Currently restorewallet() logic is written in the RPC layer
and it can´t be reused by GUI. So it reimplements this in the
wallet and interface sections and then, GUI can access it.
eaf6be0114 [net processing] Do not request transaction relay from feeler connections (John Newbery)
0220b834b1 [test] Add testing for outbound feeler connections (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Feelers are short-lived connections used to test the viability of peers. The bitcoind node will periodically open feeler connections to addresses in its addrman, wait for a `version` message from the peer, and then close the connection.
Currently, we set `fRelay` to `1` in the `version` message for feeler connections, indicating that we want the peer to relay transactions to us. However, we close the connection immediately on receipt of the `version` message, and so never process any incoming transaction announcements. This PR changes that behaviour to instead set `fRelay` to `0` indicating that we do not wish to receive transaction announcements from the peer.
This PR also extends the `addconnection` RPC to allow creating outbound feeler connections from the node to the test framework, and a test to verify that the node sets `fRelay` to `0` in the `version` message to feeler connections.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK eaf6be0114
MarcoFalke:
review ACK eaf6be0114🏃
Tree-SHA512: 1c56837dbd0a396fe404a5e39f7459864d15f666664d6b35ad109628b13158e077e417e586bf48946a23bd5cbe63716cb4bf22cdf8781b74dfce6047b87b465a
Rather than try to infer a collision by checking `AddrMan::size`,
check whether or not moving to the tried table was successful by
checking the output from `AddrMan::Good`
If AddrMan::Good is unable to add an entry
to tried (for a number of reasons), return false.
This makes it much easier and cleaner to directly
test for tried collisions. It also allows anyone
calling Good() to handle the case where adding an
address to tried is unsuccessful.
Update docs to doxygen style.
fa19bab90a fuzz: Rework FillNode (MarcoFalke)
fae6e31df7 refactor: Set fSuccessfullyConnected in FillNode (MarcoFalke)
fa3583f856 fuzz: Avoid negative NodeId in ConsumeNode (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Currently `FillNode` is a bit clumsy because it directly modifies memory of `CNode`. This gets in the way of moving that memory to `Peer`. Also, it isn't particularly consistent. See for example https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21160#discussion_r739206139 .
Fix all issues by sending a `version`/`verack` in `FillNode` and let net_processing figure out the internal details.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Strong concept ACK and light code review ACK fa19bab90a
Tree-SHA512: 33261d857c3fa6d5d39d742624009a29178ad5a15eb3fd062da741affa5a4854fd45ed20d59a6bba2fb068cf7b39cad6f95b2910be7cb6afdc27cd7917955b67
9544ab60ce doc: Improve ZMQ documentation (node01)
Pull request description:
This PR intends to clarify:
. when ZMQ notifications occur
. the message structure of each topic
Closes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/23452#issue-1046579585
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
ACK 9544ab60ce
Tree-SHA512: 3b1314ad5eb8c359ffabd91ce9b47cf6cf8efa69be083a3bb5d865833ac67d7a88a8e012c4a4f59f2cd2a0e7f491e828897e85e9d01bae72ee83c4a6ad459f6e
1ef2c03452 Add multisig tutorial (lsilva01)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a mutisig tutorial, as requested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/21278
Although there is already a brief explanation and a functional test about the multisig implemented in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22067, this tutorial proposes to use the signet (instead of regtest), bringing the reader closer to a real environment and explaining some functions in more detail.
I'm not sure if this format should be in this repository or on some wiki page. But as there is an open issue regarding this matter, that is my suggestion.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-utACK 1ef2c03452
prayank23:
ACK 1ef2c03452
Tree-SHA512: 2c3f17a8c50e554f802029dceb28ab90a77021f135b8cbd77dca3879ba1f1a0eac6bda0afb90d1ff6b8116fb0628471687d3fb77bb255ef5d8b9590b775cbce9
fa26c55644 wallet: Replace Assume with Assert where needed in coinselection (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
`Assume` should only be used when a failed check is recoverable. The checks here don't recover and would run into UB, so use `Assert` instead.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
Code-review ACK fa26c55644
Tree-SHA512: 0cf9435f9ec44794022ce0274cba602aec95102ab73f4c8a93dae54ef4c0a594f6a81640477039719ddfb6f23b05f8ece3e4886ef7f8a725efff45685ac49d92
Ensure that blocks past the snapshot base block (i.e. the end of the
assumed-valid region of the chain) are not included in
setBlockIndexCandidates for the background validation chainstate. These
blocks, while fully validated and lacking the BLOCK_ASSUMED_VALID flag,
*rely* on blocks which are assumed-valid, and so shouldn't be added to
the IBD chainstate.
Co-authored-by: Russ Yanofsky <russ@yanofsky.org>
Avoid modifying the genesis block index entry during snapshot load. This
is because, in a future change that fixes LoadBlockIndex for UTXO
snapshots, we detect block index entries that are reliant on
assumed-valid ancestors and treat them specially.
Since the genesis block doesn't have BLOCK_VALID_SCRIPTS, it would be
erroneously marked BLOCK_ASSUMED_VALID during snapshot load if we didn't
skip it here. This would cause a "setBlockIndexCandidates() empty"
assertion to be tripped since all block index entries would be marked
assume-valid due to genesis, which is never re-validated.
There's probably no good reason to modify the genesis block index entry
during snapshot load anyway...
