In many cases, it is known at compile time how many bits are requested from
randbits. Provide a variant of randbits that accepts this number as a template,
to make sure the compiler can make use of this knowledge. This is used immediately
in rand32() and randbool(), and a few further call sites.
The previous randbits code would, when requesting more randomness than available
in its random bits buffer, discard the remaining entropy and generate new.
Benchmarks show that it's usually better to first consume the existing randomness
and only then generate new ones. This adds some complexity to randbits, but it
doesn't weigh up against the reduced need to generate more randomness.
The "connect to ourself" detection logic has been first introduced
by Satoshi in October 2009, together with a couple of other changes
and a version bump to "v0.1.6 BETA" (see commit
cc0b4c3b62).
73f0a6cbd0 doc: detail -rpccookieperms option (willcl-ark)
d2afa2690c test: add rpccookieperms test (willcl-ark)
f467aede78 init: add option for rpccookie permissions (willcl-ark)
7df03f1a92 util: add perm string helper functions (willcl-ark)
Pull request description:
This PR picks up #26088 by aureleoules which adds a bitcoind launch option `-rpccookieperms` to set the file permissions of the cookie generated by bitcoin core.
Example usage to make the generated cookie group-readable: `./src/bitcoind -rpccookieperms=group`.
Accepted values for `-rpccookieperms` are `[owner|group|all]`. We let `fs::perms` handle platform-specific permissions changes.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 73f0a6cbd0
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 73f0a6cbd0. Main change since last review is no longer throwing a skip exception in the rpc test on windows, so other checks can run after it, and overall test result is passing, not skipped. Also were clarifying renames and documentation improvements.
tdb3:
cr ACK 73f0a6cbd0
Tree-SHA512: e800d59a44aca10e1c58ca69bf3fdde9f6ccf5eab4b7b962645af6d6bc0cfa3a357701e409c8c60d8d7744fcd33a91e77ada11790aa88cd7811ef60fab86ab11
This allows a transaction's weight to be bound under a certain
weight if possible and desired. This can be beneficial for future
RBF attempts, or whenever a more restricted spend topology is
desired.
Co-authored-by: Greg Sanders <gsanders87@gmail.com>
72b226882f wallet: notify when preset + automatic inputs exceed max weight (furszy)
Pull request description:
Small change. Found it while finishing my review on #29523. This does not interfere with it.
Basically, we are erroring out early when the automatic coin selection process exceeds the maximum weight, but we are not doing so when the user-preselected inputs combined with the wallet-selected inputs exceed the maximum weight.
This change avoids signing all inputs before erroring out and introduces test coverage for `fundrawtransaction`.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 72b226882f
tdb3:
re ACK for 72b226882f
rkrux:
tACK [72b2268](72b226882f)
ismaelsadeeq:
utACK 72b226882f
Tree-SHA512: d77be19231023383a9c79a5d66b642dcbc6ebfc31a363e0b9f063c44898720a7859ec211cdbc0914ac7a3bfdf15e52fb8fc20d97f171431f70492c0f159dbc36
a9716c53f0 rpc: call IsInitialBlockDownload via miner interface (Sjors Provoost)
dda0b0834f rpc: minize getTipHash() calls in gbt (Sjors Provoost)
7b4d3249ce rpc: call processNewBlock via miner interface (Sjors Provoost)
9e228351e7 rpc: getTransactionsUpdated via miner interface (Sjors Provoost)
64ebb0f971 Always pass options to BlockAssembler constructor (Sjors Provoost)
4bf2e361da rpc: call CreateNewBlock via miner interface (Sjors Provoost)
404b01c436 rpc: getblocktemplate getTipHash() via Miner interface (Sjors Provoost)
d8a3496b5a rpc: call TestBlockValidity via miner interface (Sjors Provoost)
8ecb681678 Introduce Mining interface (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Introduce a `Mining` interface for the `getblocktemplate`, `generateblock` and other mining RPCs to use now, and for Stratum v2 to use later.
Suggested here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29346#issuecomment-2108528652
The selection of methods added to the interface is mostly based on what the Template Provider in #29432 uses. It could be expanded further so that `rpc/mining.cpp` no longer needs `EnsureMemPool` and `EnsureChainman`.
This PR should be a pure refactor.
ACKs for top commit:
tdb3:
re ACK a9716c53f0
itornaza:
Code review and std-tests ACK a9716c53f0
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK a9716c53f0 with one minor suggestion in case you update. Only changes since last review were other small changes to the interface.
Tree-SHA512: cf97f87d6e9ed89da3835a0730da3b24a7b14c8605ea221149103a5915e79598cf082a95f2bc88e33f1c450e3d4aad88aed1163a29195acca88bcace055af724
This test type is represented using SEND_NO_AAD. If AAD of the first encrypted packet
sent after the garbage terminator (optional decoy packet/version packet) hasn't been
filled, disconnection happens.
This test type is represented using WRONG_GARBAGE.
Here, garbage bytes sent to TestNode are assumed to be tampered with and
do not correspond to the garbage bytes which P2PInterface calculated and
uses.
This test type is represented using WRONG_GARBAGE_TERMINATOR.
since the wrong garbage terminator is sent to TestNode, TestNode
will interpret all of the gabage bytes, wrong garbage terminator,
decoy messages and version packet it receives as garbage bytes.
If the length of all these is more than 4095 + 16, it will result
in a missing garbage terminator error. otherwise, it will result
in a V2 handshake timeout error.
Send only MAX_GARBAGE_LEN//2 bytes of garbage data to TestNode
so that the total length received by the TestNode is at max
= (MAX_GARBAGE_LEN//2) + 16 + 10*120 + 20 = 3283 bytes
(which is less than 4095 + 16 bytes) and we get a consistent
V2 handshake timeout error message.
If we do not limit the garbage length sent, we will intermittently
get both missing garbage terminator error and V2 handshake
timeout error based on the garbage length and decoy packets length
which are chosen at random.
6eecba475e net_processing: make MaybePunishNodeFor{Block,Tx} return void (Pieter Wuille)
ae60d485da net_processing: remove Misbehavior score and increments (Pieter Wuille)
6457c31197 net_processing: make all Misbehaving increments = 100 (Pieter Wuille)
5120ab1478 net_processing: drop 8 headers threshold for incoming BIP130 (Pieter Wuille)
944c54290d net_processing: drop Misbehavior for unconnecting headers (Pieter Wuille)
9f66ac7cf1 net_processing: do not treat non-connecting headers as response (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
So far, discouragement of peers triggers when their misbehavior score exceeds 100 points. Most types of misbehavior increment the score by 100, triggering immediate discouragement, but some types do not. This PR makes all increments equal to either 100 (meaning any misbehavior will immediately cause disconnection and discouragement) or 0 (making the behavior effectively unconditionally allowed), and then removes the logic for score accumulation.
This simplifies the code a bit, but also makes protocol expectations clearer: if a peer misbehaves, they get disconnected. There is no good reason why certain types of protocol violations should be permitted 4 times (howmuch=20) or 9 times (howmuch=10), while many others are never allowed. Furthermore, the distinction between these looks arbitrary.
The specific types of misbehavior that are changed to 100 are:
* Sending us a `block` which does not connect to our header tree (which necessarily must have been unsollicited). [used to be score 10]
* Sending us a `headers` with a non-continuous headers sequence. [used to be score 20]
* Sending us more than 1000 addresses in a single `addr` or `addrv2` message [used to be score 20]
* Sending us more than 50000 invs in a single `inv` message [used to be score 20]
* Sending us more than 2000 headers in a single `headers` message [used to be score 20]
The specific types of misbehavior that are changed to 0 are:
* Sending us 10 (*) separate BIP130 headers announcements that do not connect to our block tree [used to be score 20]
* Sending us more than 8 headers in a single `headers` message (which thus does not get treated as a BIP130 announcement) that does not connect to our block tree. [used to be score 10]
I believe that none of these behaviors are unavoidable, except for the one marked (*) which can in theory happen still due to interaction between BIP130 and variations in system clocks (the max 2 hour in the future rule). This one has been removed entirely. In order to remove the impact of the bug it was designed to deal with, without relying on misbehavior, a separate improvement is included that makes `getheaders`-tracking more accurate.
In another unrelated improvement, this also gets rid of the 8 header limit heuristic to determine whether an incoming non-connecting `headers` is a potential BIP130 announcement, as this rule is no longer needed to prevent spurious Misbehavior. Instead, any non-connecting `headers` is now treated as a potential announcement.
ACKs for top commit:
sr-gi:
ACK [6eecba4](6eecba475e)
achow101:
ACK 6eecba475e
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK 6eecba475e
glozow:
light code review / concept ACK 6eecba475e
Tree-SHA512: e11e8a652c4ec048d8961086110a3594feefbb821e13f45c14ef81016377be0db44b5311751ef635d6e026def1960aff33f644e78ece11cfb54f2b7daa96f946
94ed4fbf8e Add release note for size 2 package rbf (Greg Sanders)
afd52d8e63 doc: update package RBF comment (Greg Sanders)
6e3c4394cf mempool: Improve logging of replaced transactions (Greg Sanders)
d3466e4cc5 CheckPackageMempoolAcceptResult: Check package rbf invariants (Greg Sanders)
316d7b63c9 Fuzz: pass mempool to CheckPackageMempoolAcceptResult (Greg Sanders)
4d15bcf448 [test] package rbf (glozow)
dc21f61c72 [policy] package rbf (Suhas Daftuar)
5da3967815 PackageV3Checks: Relax assumptions (Greg Sanders)
Pull request description:
Allows any 2 transaction package with no in-mempool ancestors to do package RBF when directly conflicting with other mempool clusters of size two or less.
Proposed validation steps:
1) If the transaction package is of size 1, legacy rbf rules apply.
2) Otherwise the transaction package consists of a (parent, child) pair with no other in-mempool ancestors (or descendants, obviously), so it is also going to create a cluster of size 2. If larger, fail.
3) The package rbf may not evict more than 100 transactions from the mempool(bip125 rule 5)
4) The package is a single chunk
5) Every directly conflicted mempool transaction is connected to at most 1 other in-mempool transaction (ie the cluster size of the conflict is at most 2).
6) Diagram check: We ensure that the replacement is strictly superior, improving the mempool
7) The total fee of the package, minus the total fee of what is being evicted, is at least the minrelayfee * size of the package (equivalent to bip125 rule 3 and 4)
Post-cluster mempool this will likely be expanded to general package rbf, but this is what we can safely support today.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 94ed4fbf8e
glozow:
reACK 94ed4fbf8e via range-diff
ismaelsadeeq:
re-ACK 94ed4fbf8e
theStack:
Code-review ACK 94ed4fbf8e
murchandamus:
utACK 94ed4fbf8e
Tree-SHA512: 9bd383e695964f362f147482bbf73b1e77c4d792bda2e91d7f30d74b3540a09146a5528baf86854a113005581e8c75f04737302517b7d5124296bd7a151e3992
881724d443 test: Added test coverage to listsinceblock rpc (kevkevinpal)
Pull request description:
This change is meant to add test coverage to this rpc error https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/wallet/rpc/transactions.cpp#L666C53-L666C79
This is done by renaming the first block in the blocks folder
---
Doing a quick grep for the error code in our functional tests leads to zero results
`grep -nri "Can't read block from disk" ./test/functional/`
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 881724d443
tdb3:
re ACK for 881724d443
rkrux:
tACK [881724](881724d443)
Tree-SHA512: c5dff20cf014d0181f49d6b161f1364e1c6b79e8661047f77f07e21e59f4d1f2fd6f745538c8fc5bd6d4244650a840dd64d184634366f7c21fa67141a60af44a
5cf0a1f230 test: add `createmultisig` P2MS encoding test for all n (1..20) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
0570d2c204 test: add unit test for `keys_to_multisig_script` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
0c41fc3fa5 test: fix `keys_to_multisig_script` (P2MS) helper for n/k > 16 (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
While reviewing #28307, I noticed that the test framework's `key_to_multisig_script` helper (introduced in #23305) is broken for pubkey count (n) and threshold (k) values larger than 16. This is due to the implementation currently enforcing a direct single-byte data push (using `CScriptOp.encode_op_n`), which obviously fails for values 17+. Fix that by passing the numbers directly to the CScript list, where it's automatically converted to minimally-encoded pushes (see class method `CScript.__coerce_instance`, branch `isinstance(other, int)`).
The second commit adds a unit test to ensure that the encoding is correct.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 5cf0a1f230
tdb3:
ACK 5cf0a1f230
rkrux:
reACK [5cf0a1f](5cf0a1f230)
Tree-SHA512: 4168a165c3f483ec8e37a27dba1628a7ea0063545a2b7e74d9e20d753fddd7e33d37e1a190434fa6dca39adf9eef5d0211f7a0c1c7b44979f0a3bb350e267562
Prior to this commit, TestEncryptedP2PState would always
send initial_v2_handshake bytes in 2 parts (as required
by early key response test).
For generalising this test and having different v2 handshake
behaviour based on the test type, special behaviours like
sending initial_v2_handshake bytes in 2 parts are executed
only if test_type is set to EARLY_KEY_RESPONSE.
Adds argument --resultsfile to test_runner.py.
Writes comma-separated functional test name, status,
and duration to the file provided with the argument.
Also fixes minor typo in test_runner.py
f58beabe75 test: bumpfee with user specified fee_rate ignores walletIncrementalRelayFee (ismaelsadeeq)
436e88f433 bumpfee: ignore WALLET_INCREMENTAL_RELAY_FEE when user specifies fee rate (ismaelsadeeq)
Pull request description:
Fixes#26973
When using the `bumpfee` RPC and manually specifying `fee_rate`, there should be no requirement that the new fee must be at least the sum of the original fee and `incrementalFee` (maximum of `relayIncrementalFee` and `WALLET_INCREMENTAL_RELAY_FEE`).
This restriction should only apply when user did not specify `fee_rate`.
> because the GUI doesn't let the user specify the new fee rate yet (https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/issues/647), it would be very annoying to have to bump 20 times to increment by 20 sat/vbyte.
The restriction should instead be the new fee must be at least the sum of the original fee and `incrementalFee` (`relayIncrementalFee`)
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK f58beabe75
murchandamus:
ACK f58beabe75
Tree-SHA512: 193259f87173b7d5a8e68e0e29f2ca7e75c550e3cf0dee3d6d822b5b1e07c2e6dec0bfc8fb435855736ebced97a10dbdbfef72e8c5abde06fdefcba122f2e7f1
e2779ce98b test: cover more errors for `signrawtransactionwithkey` RPC (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for the following errors for the `signrawtransactionwithkey` RPC:
- Invalid private key
- TX decode failed
For reference: https://maflcko.github.io/b-c-cov/total.coverage/src/rpc/rawtransaction.cpp.gcov.html
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
ACK e2779ce98b
kevkevinpal:
ACK [e2779ce](e2779ce98b)
tdb3:
ACK e2779ce98b
BrandonOdiwuor:
Code Review ACK e2779ce98b
Tree-SHA512: 41c7e990684b60645cf4ccec8aad5ebbe61da221871eb3c1685b2bb1eebda58b29358502cb1525b7c7a2b612e2bebf449ed0bae14ab663b4641c528a9c013b5b
0fcbfdb7ad Support running individual lint checks (David Gumberg)
Pull request description:
This PR was split out from #29965:
Adds support for running individual tests in the rust lint suite by passing `--lint=LINT_TO_RUN` to the lint runner. This PR also adds a corresponding help message.
When running with `cargo run`, arguments after a double dash (`--`) are passed to the binary instead of the cargo command. For example, in order to run the linter check that tabs are not used as whitespace:
```console
cd test/lint/test_runner && cargo run -- --lint=tabs_whitespace
```
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
ACK 0fcbfdb7ad
achow101:
ACK 0fcbfdb7ad
marcofleon:
Tested ACK 0fcbfdb7ad. Ran `cargo run` with various of the individual tests and with bad input. Also ran it with no arguments. Everything works as expected and help message looks good.
Tree-SHA512: 48fe4aa9fbb2acef5f8e3c17382ae22e0e350ae6ad9aeeb1a3c0a9192de98809f98728e32b8db24a36906ace999e35626ebd6cb2ca05f74146d21e9b6fb14615
429ec1aaaa refactor: Rename CTransaction::nVersion to version (Ava Chow)
27e70f1f5b consensus: Store transaction nVersion as uint32_t (Ava Chow)
Pull request description:
Given that the use of a transaction's nVersion is always as an unsigned int, it doesn't make sense to store it as signed and then cast it to unsigned everywhere it is used and displayed.
Since a few alternative implementations have recently been revealed to have made an error with this signedness that would have resulted in consensus failure, I think it makes sense for us to just make this always unsigned to make it clear that the version is treated as unsigned. This would also help us avoid future potential issues with signedness of this value.
I believe that this is safe and does not actually change what transactions would or would not be considered both standard and consensus valid. Within consensus, the only use of the version in consensus is in BIP68 validation which was already casting it to uint32_t. Within policy, although it is used as a signed int for the transaction version number check, I do not think that this change would change standardness. Standard transactions are limited to the range [1, 2]. Negative numbers would have fallen under the < 1 condition, but by making it unsigned, they are still non-standard under the > 2 condition.
Unsigned and signed ints are serialized and unserialized the same way so there is no change in serialization.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
ACK 429ec1aaaa 🐿
glozow:
ACK 429ec1aaaa
shaavan:
ACK 429ec1aaaa💯
Tree-SHA512: 0bcd92a245d7d16c3665d2d4e815a4ef28207ad4a1fb46c6f0203cdafeab1b82c4e95e4bdce7805d80a4f4a46074f6542abad708e970550d38a00d759e3dcef1
47f705b33f tests: add fuzz tests for BitSet (Pieter Wuille)
59a6df6bd5 util: add BitSet (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Extracted from #30126.
This introduces the `BitSet` data structure, inspired by `std::bitset`, but with a few features that cannot be implemented on top without efficiency loss:
* Finding the first set bit (`First`)
* Finding the last set bit (`Last`)
* Iterating over all set bits (`begin` and `end`).
And a few other operators/member functions that help readability for #30126:
* `operator-` for set subtraction
* `Overlaps()` for testing whether intersection is non-empty
* `IsSupersetOf()` for testing (non-strict) supersetness
* `IsSubsetOf()` for testing (non-strict) subsetness
* `Fill()` to construct a set with all numbers from 0 to n-1, inclusive
* `Singleton()` to construct a set with one specific element.
Everything is tested through a simulation-based fuzz test that compares the behavior with normal `std::bitset` equivalent operations.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK 47f705b33f
achow101:
ACK 47f705b33f
cbergqvist:
re-ACK 47f705b33f
theStack:
Code-review ACK 47f705b33f
Tree-SHA512: e451bf4b801f193239ee434b6b614f5a2ac7bb49c70af5aba24c2ac0c54acbef4672556800e4ac799ae835632bdba716209c5ca8c37433a6883dab4eb7cd67c1
24bc46c83b cli: Add warning for duplicate port definition (tdb3)
e208fb5d3b cli: Sanitize ports in rpcconnect and rpcport (tdb3)
Pull request description:
Adds invalid port detection to bitcoin-cli for -rpcconnect and -rpcport.
In addition to detecting malformed/invalid ports (e.g. those outside of the 16-bit port range, not numbers, etc.), bitcoin-cli also now considers usage of port 0 to be invalid. bitcoin-cli previously considered port 0 to be valid and attempted to use it to reach bitcoind.
Functional tests were added for invalid port detection as well as port prioritization.
Additionally, a warning is provided when a port is specified in both -rpcconnect and -rpcport.
This PR is an alternate approach to PR #27820 (e.g. SplitHostPort is unmodified).
Considered an alternative to 127.0.0.1 being specified in functional tests, but at first glance, this might need an update to test_framework/util.py (e.g. rpc_url), which might be left to a future PR.
ACKs for top commit:
S3RK:
light code review ACK 24bc46c83b
achow101:
ACK 24bc46c83b
cbergqvist:
re ACK 24bc46c83b
Tree-SHA512: c83ab6a30a08dd1ac8b368a7dcc2b4f23170f0b61dd67ffcad7bcda05096d333bcb9821fba11018151f55b2929c0a333bfec15b8bb863d83f41fc1974c6efca5
Not every pseudorandom hash result is a valid x-only public key,
so the pubkey tweaking in the course of creating the output public
key would fail about every second time.
Fix this by treating the hash result as private key and calculate
the x-only public key out of that, to be used then as internal key.
ab98e6fd03 test: add coverage for errors for `combinerawtransaction` RPC (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for the following errors for the `combinerawtransaction` RPC:
* Tx decode failed
* Missing transactions
* Input not found or already spent
For reference: https://maflcko.github.io/b-c-cov/total.coverage/src/rpc/rawtransaction.cpp.gcov.html
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK ab98e6fd03
tdb3:
ACK ab98e6fd03
Tree-SHA512: 8a133c25dad2e1b236e0278a88796f60f763e3fd6fbbc080f926bb23f9dcc55599aa242d6e0c4ec15a179d9ded10a1f17ee5b6063719107ea84e6099f10416b2
0000276b31 test: Remove redundant verack check (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Currently the sync in `connect_nodes` mentions the `version` and `verack` message types, but only checks the `verack`. Neither check is required, as the `pong` check implies both. In case of failure, the debug log will have to be consulted anyway, so the redundant check doesn't add value.
Also clarify in the comments that the goal is to check the flag `fSuccessfullyConnected` indirectly.
ACKs for top commit:
furszy:
utACK 0000276b31
brunoerg:
ACK 0000276b31
tdb3:
ACK 0000276b31
Tree-SHA512: f9ddcb1436d2f70da462a8dd470ecfc90a534dd6507c23877ef7626e7c02326c077001a42ad0171a87fba5c5275d1970d8c5e5d82c56c8412de944856fdfd6db
This commit fixes a dormant bug in MiniWallet that exists since
support for P2TR was initially added in #23371 (see commit
041abfebe4).
In the course of spending the output, the leaf version byte of the
control block in the witness stack doesn't set the parity bit, i.e.
we were so far just lucky that the used combinations of relevant
data (internal pubkey, leaf script / version) didn't result in a
tweaked pubkey with odd y-parity. If that was the case, we'd get the
following validation error:
`mandatory-script-verify-flag-failed (Witness program hash mismatch) (-26)`
Since MiniWallets can now optionally be tagged (#29939), resulting
in different internal pubkeys, the issue is more prevalent now.
Fix it by passing the parity bit, as specified in BIP341.
Rather than only returning the internal key from the P2TR anyone-can-spend
address creation routine, provide the whole TaprootInfo object, which in turn
contains a dictionary of TaprootLeafInfo object for named leaves.
This data is used in MiniWallet for the default ADDRESS_OP_TRUE mode, in order
to deduplicate the witness script and leaf version of the control block.
39d135e79f test: MiniWallet: respect fee_rate for target_weight, use in mempool_limit.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
b2f0a9f8b0 test: add framework functional test for MiniWallet's tx padding (Sebastian Falbesoner)
c17550bc3a test: MiniWallet: fix tx padding (`target_weight`) for large sizes, improve accuracy (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
MiniWallet allows to create padded transactions that are equal or slightly above a certain `target_weight` (first introduced in PR #25379, commit 1d6b438ef0), which can be useful especially for mempool-related tests, e.g. for policy limit checks or scenarios to trigger mempool eviction. Currently the `target_weight` parameter doesn't play together with `fee_rate` though, as the fee calculation is incorrectly based on the tx vsize before the padding output is added, so the fee-rate is consequently far off. This means users are forced to pass an absolute fee, which can be quite inconvenient and leads to lots of duplicated "calculate absolute fee from fee-rate and vsize" code with the pattern `fee = (feerate / 1000) * (weight // 4)` on the call-sites.
This PR first improves the tx padding itself to be more accurate, adds a functional test for it, and fixes the `fee_rate` treatment for the `{create,send}_self_transfer` methods. (Next step would be to enable this also for the `_self_transfer_multi` methods, but those currently don't even offer a `fee_rate` parameter). Finally, the ability to pass both `target_weight` and `fee_rate` is used in the `mempool_limit.py` functional test. There might be more use-cases in other tests, that could be done in a follow-up.
ACKs for top commit:
rkrux:
tACK [39d135e](39d135e79f)
ismaelsadeeq:
Code Review ACK 39d135e79f🚀
glozow:
light review ACK 39d135e79f
Tree-SHA512: 6bf8e853a921576d463291d619cdfd6a7e74cf92f61933a563800ac0b3c023a06569b581243166906f56b3c5e8858fec2d8a6910d55899e904221f847eb0953d
f68cba29b3 blockman: Replace m_reindexing with m_blockfiles_indexed (Ryan Ofsky)
1b1c6dcca0 test: Add functional test for continuing a reindex (TheCharlatan)
201c1a9282 indexes: Don't wipe indexes again when already reindexing (TheCharlatan)
804f09dfa1 kernel: Add less confusing reindex options (Ryan Ofsky)
e172553223 validation: Remove needs_init from LoadBlockIndex (TheCharlatan)
533eab7d67 bugfix: Streamline setting reindex option (TheCharlatan)
Pull request description:
When restarting `bitcoind` during an ongoing reindex without setting the `-reindex` flag again, the block and coins db is left intact, but any data from the optional indexes is discarded. While not a bug per se, wiping the data again is
wasteful, both in terms of having to write it again, as well as potentially leading to longer startup times. So keep the index data instead when continuing a prior reindex.
Also includes a bugfix and smaller code cleanups around the reindexing code. The bug was introduced in b47bd95920: "kernel: De-globalize fReindex".
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
ACK f68cba29b3
fjahr:
Code review ACK f68cba29b3
furszy:
Code review ACK f68cba29b3
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK f68cba29b3. Only changes since last review were cherry-picking suggested commits that rename variables, improving comments, and making some tweaks to test code.
Tree-SHA512: b252228cc76e9f1eaac56d5bd9e4eac23408e0fc04aeffd97a85417f046229364673ee1ca7410b9b6e7b692b03f13ece17c42a10176da0d7e975a8915deb98ca
This adds a bitset module that implements a BitSet<N> class, a variant
of std::bitset with a few additional features that cannot be implemented
in a wrapper without performance loss (specifically, finding first and
last bit set, or iterating over all set bits).
1f6ab1215b minor: remove unnecessary semicolons from RPC content type examples (Matthew Zipkin)
b225295298 test: use json-rpc 2.0 in all functional tests by default (Matthew Zipkin)
391843b029 bitcoin-cli: use json-rpc 2.0 (Matthew Zipkin)
d39bdf3397 test: remove unused variable in interface_rpc.py (Matthew Zipkin)
0ead71df8c doc: update and link for JSON-RPC 2.0 (Matthew Zipkin)
Pull request description:
This is a follow-up to #27101.
- Addresses [post-merge comments ](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27101#discussion_r1606723428)
- bitcoin-cli uses JSON-RPC 2.0
- functional tests use JSON-RPC 2.0 by default (exceptions are in the regression tests added by #27101)
ACKs for top commit:
tdb3:
ACK 1f6ab1215b
cbergqvist:
ACK 1f6ab1215b
Tree-SHA512: 49bf14c70464081280216ece538a2f5ec810bac80a86a83ad3284f0f1b017edf755a1a74a45be279effe00218170cafde7c2de58aed07097a95c2c6b837a6b6c
In order to ensure that the change of nVersion to a uint32_t in the
previous commit has no effect, rename nVersion to version in this commit
so that reviewers can easily spot if a spot was missed or if there is a
check somewhere whose semantics have changed.
30a01134cd [doc] update bips.md for 431 (glozow)
9dbe6a03f0 [test] wallet uses CURRENT_VERSION which is 2 (glozow)
539404fe0f [policy] make v3 transactions standard (glozow)
052ede75af [refactor] use TRUC_VERSION in place of 3 (glozow)
Pull request description:
Make `nVersion=3` (which is currently nonstandard on mainnet) standard.
Note that we will treat these transactions as Topologically Restricted Until Confirmation (TRUC). Spec is in BIP 431 and implementation is in #28948, #29306, and #29873
See #27463 for overall project tracking, and #29319 for information about relevance to cluster mempool.
ACKs for top commit:
sdaftuar:
utACK 30a01134c
achow101:
ACK 30a01134cd
instagibbs:
utACK 30a01134cd
murchandamus:
ACK 30a01134cd
ismaelsadeeq:
ACK 30a01134cd🛰️
Tree-SHA512: 2a4aec0442c860e792a061d83e36483c1f1b426f946efbdf664c8db97a596e498b535707e1d3a900218429486ea69fd4552e3d476526a6883cbd5556c6534b48
fa52e13ee8 test: Remove struct.pack from almost all places (MarcoFalke)
fa826db477 scripted-diff: test: Use int.to_bytes over struct packing (MarcoFalke)
faf2a975ad test: Use int.to_bytes over struct packing (MarcoFalke)
faf3cd659a test: Normalize struct.pack format (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
`struct.pack` has many issues:
* The format string consists of characters that may be confusing and may need to be looked up in the documentation, as opposed to using easy to understand self-documenting code.
This lead to many test bugs, which weren't hit, which is fine, but still confusing. Ref: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29400, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29399, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29363, fa3886b7c6, ...
Fix all issues by using the built-in `int` helpers `to_bytes` via a scripted diff.
Review notes:
* For `struct.pack` and `int.to_bytes` the error behavior is the same, although the error messages are not identical.
* Two `struct.pack` remain. One for float serialization in a C++ code comment, and one for native serialization.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fa52e13ee8
rkrux:
tACK [fa52e13](fa52e13ee8)
theStack:
Code-review ACK fa52e13ee8
Tree-SHA512: ee80d935b68ae43d1654b047e84ceb80abbd20306df35cca848b3f7874634b518560ddcbc7e714e2e7a19241e153dee64556dc4701287ae811e26e4f8c57fe3e
The helper assumes that the n and k values have to be provided as a
single byte push operation, which is only possible for values up to 16.
Fix that by passing the numbers directly to the CScript list, where it's
automatically converted to minimally-encoded pushes (see class
method `CScript.__coerce_instance`, branch `isinstance(other, int)`).
In case of 17..20, this means that the data-pushes are done with two
bytes using OP_PUSH1 (0x01), e.g. for n=20: 0x01,0x14
4444de152f test: Set mocktime in p2p_disconnect_ban.py to avoid intermittent test failure (MarcoFalke)
fa6aa4027c test: Fix typos and use names args (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Otherwise, the test may fail on slow hardware when running in valgrind.
Also, use named args for the absolute timepoint, while touching this file.
ACKs for top commit:
tdb3:
ACK for 4444de152f
AngusP:
re-ACK 4444de152f
Tree-SHA512: 660269c8dd18887d69b284f38656899caf028159ce83ddf921f3e9c080a5d0e663989f0e42b4baf4c4939f20f34da0e7e844dff9b7c91d0cab570c60958bd0e1
07aba8dd21 functional test: ensure confirmed utxo being sourced for 2nd chain (Greg Sanders)
Pull request description:
The test could fail/stop testing what we want if non-confirmed utxos become sourced through some internal change to `MiniWallet`; better to just fetch confirmed explicitly.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 07aba8dd21
ismaelsadeeq:
utACK 07aba8dd21
theStack:
ACK 07aba8dd21
Tree-SHA512: 66795fdf881139ed91bde0f8239a46bd9bc70bb311fa97c0e2b5537e1fd2a1fd36bf3a225fc77b9695deb835a9d6d29879aa1e05ea5054b9a33a400e199da014
2451a217dd test: addmultisigaddress, coverage for script size limits (furszy)
53302a0981 bugfix: addmultisigaddress, add unsupported operation for redeem scripts over 520 bytes (furszy)
9be6065cc0 test: coverage for 16-20 segwit multisig scripts (furszy)
9d9a91c4ea rpc: bugfix, incorrect segwit redeem script size used in signrawtransactionwithkey (furszy)
0c9fedfc45 fix incorrect multisig redeem script size limit for segwit (furszy)
f7a173b578 test: rpc_createmultisig, decouple 'test_sortedmulti_descriptors_bip67' (furszy)
4f33dbd8f8 test: rpc_createmultisig, decouple 'test_mixing_uncompressed_and_compressed_keys' (furszy)
25a81705d3 test: rpc_createmultisig, remove unnecessary checkbalances() (furszy)
b5a3289433 test: refactor, multiple cleanups in rpc_createmultisig.py (furszy)
3635d43268 test: rpc_createmultisig, remove manual wallet initialization (furszy)
Pull request description:
Fixing https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28250#issuecomment-1674830104 and more.
Currently, redeem scripts longer than 520 bytes, which are technically valid under segwit rules, have flaws in the following processes:
1) The multisig creation process fails to deduce the output descriptor, resulting in the generation of an incorrect descriptor. Additionally, the accompanying user warning is also inaccurate.
2) The `signrawtransactionwithkey` RPC command fail to sign them.
3) The legacy wallet `addmultisigaddress` wrongly discards them.
The issue arises because most of these flows are utilizing the legacy spkm keystore, which imposes
the [p2sh max redeem script size rule](ded6873340/src/script/signingprovider.cpp (L160)) on all scripts. Which blocks segwit redeem scripts longer than
the max element size in all the previously mentioned processes (`createmultisig`, `addmultisigaddress`, and
`signrawtransactionwithkey`).
This PR fixes the problem, enabling the creation of multisig output descriptors involving more than 15 keys and
allowing the signing of these scripts, along with other post-segwit redeem scripts that surpass the 520-byte
p2sh limit.
Important note:
Instead of adding support for these longer redeem scripts in the legacy wallet, an "unsupported operation"
error has been added. The reasons behind this decision are:
1) The introduction of this feature brings about a compatibility-breaking change that requires downgrade
protection; older wallets would be unable to interact with these "new" legacy wallets.
2) Considering the ongoing deprecation of the legacy spkm, this issue provides another compelling
reason to transition towards descriptors.
Testing notes:
To easily verify each of the fixes, I decoupled the tests into standalone commits. So they can be
cherry-picked on top of master. Where `rpc_createmultisig.py` (with and without the `--legacy-wallet`
arg) will fail without the bugs fixes commits.
Extra note:
The initial commits improves the `rpc_createmultisig.py` test in many ways. I found this test very
antiquated, screaming for an update and cleanup.
ACKs for top commit:
pinheadmz:
ACK 2451a217dd
theStack:
Code-review ACK 2451a217dd
achow101:
ACK 2451a217dd
Tree-SHA512: 71794533cbd46b3a1079fb4e9d190d3ea3b615de0cbfa443466e14f05e4616ca90e12ce2bf07113515ea8113e64a560ad572bb9ea9d4835b6fb67b6ae596167f
df6dc2aaae test: Assumeutxo: snapshots with less work should not be loaded (Hernan Marino)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a test which checks that snapshots with less accumulated work than the node's active chain, should not be loaded and return with an error. Although in a different context of discussion the missing test was detect in a thread in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29394 (see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29394#discussion_r1484122214)
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
utACK df6dc2aaae
kevkevinpal:
utACK [df6dc2a](df6dc2aaae)
achow101:
ACK df6dc2aaae
alfonsoromanz:
Re ACK df6dc2aaae. Make is successful and the test passes.
Tree-SHA512: 07a394b4b288cc8ad3f66ed4e70dcda468db18113e9442eb7215cf491768432d55efaaa5b79d633094917e05475a30f0c5e4f64f8f2da293ba306891b4485560
71aae72e1f test: test sendall does ancestor aware funding (ishaanam)
36757941a0 wallet, rpc: implement ancestor aware funding for sendall (ishaanam)
544131f3fb rpc, test: test sendall spends unconfirmed change and unconfirmed inputs when specified (ishaanam)
Pull request description:
This PR:
- Adds a functional test that `sendall` spends unconfirmed change
- Adds a functional test that `sendall` spends regular unconfirmed inputs when specified by user
- Adds ancestor aware funding to `sendall` by using `calculateCombinedBumpFee` and adjusting the effective value accordingly
- Adds a functional test for ancestor aware funding in `sendall`
ACKs for top commit:
S3RK:
ACK 71aae72e1f
achow101:
ACK 71aae72e1f
furszy:
ACK 71aae72e1f
Tree-SHA512: acaeb7c65166ce53123a1d6cb5012197202246acc02ef9f37a28154cc93afdbd77c25e840ab79bdc7e0b88904014a43ab1ddea79d5337dc310ea210634ab61f0
This removes the need to actually track misbehavior score (see further commit), because any
Misbehaving node will immediately hit the discouragement threshold.
This misbehavior was originally intended to prevent bandwidth wastage due to
actually observed very broken (but likely non-malicious) nodes that respond
to GETHEADERS with a response unrelated to the request, triggering a request
cycle.
This has however largely been addressed by the previous commit, which causes
non-connecting HEADERS that are received while a GETHEADERS has not been
responded to, to be ignored, as long as they do not time out (2 minutes).
With that, the specific misbehavior is largely irrelevant (for inbound peers,
it is now harmless; for outbound peers, the eviction logic will eventually
kick them out if they're not keeping up with headers at all).
Since https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25454 we keep track of the last
GETHEADERS request that was sent and wasn't responded to. So far, every incoming
HEADERS message is treated as a response to whatever GETHEADERS was last sent,
regardless of its contents.
This commit makes this tracking more accurate, by only treating HEADERS messages
which (1) are empty, (2) connect to our existing block header tree, or (3) are a
continuation of a low-work headers sync as responses that clear the "outstanding
GETHEADERS" state (m_last_getheaders_timestamp).
That means that HEADERS messages which do not satisfy any of the above criteria
will be ignored, not triggering a GETHEADERS, and potentially (for now, but see
later commit) increase misbehavior score.
4b7d984269 lint: add markdown hyperlink checker (willcl-ark)
Pull request description:
Potential followup to: #30025
This should prevent us reintroducing broken markdown links.
It does not test "online" (external) links, only those within this repo. Both relative and absolute links are parsed successfully if they resolve.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
re-utACK 4b7d984269
davidgumberg:
reACK 4b7d984269
Tree-SHA512: 9bc40d700b73499c046bb76157bc139f32ec3850f64ef813bbf7f18f9c01a253abe6a857d6f559890165f2bd26e7742c05d86232cd9b8efb33ff85d735f4f095
Currently, transport version is a global variable declared as
TRANSPORT_VERSION in v2_p2p.py. Making it an instance variable
would help in sending non empty transport version packets for
testing purposes. It might also help EncryptedP2PState be more
extensible in far future protocol upgrades.
This adds a markdown hyperlink check task to the lint test_runner. It
relies on having the [`mlc`](https://crates.io/crates/mlc) binary found
on $PATH, but will fail with `success` if the binary is not found.
`mlc` is also added to the ci/04_install.sh script run by the
containerfile.
Note that broken markdown hyperlinks will be detected in untracked
markdown files found in a dirty working directory (including e.g.
.venv).
2fd34ba504 Add sanity checks for various ATMPArgs booleans (Greg Sanders)
20d8936d8b [refactor] make some members MemPoolAccept-wide (glozow)
cbbfe719b2 cpfp carveout is excluded in packages (glozow)
69f7ab05ba Add m_allow_sibling_eviction as separate ATMPArgs flag (Greg Sanders)
57ee3029dd Add description for m_test_accept (Greg Sanders)
Pull request description:
First few commits of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28984 to set the stage for the package RBF logic.
These refactors are preparation for evaluating an RBF in a multi-proposed-transaction context instead of only a single proposed transaction. Also, carveouts and sibling evictions only should work in single RBF cases so add logic to preclude multi-tx cases in the future.
No behavior changes aside from bailing earlier from failed carve-outs.
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
reACK 2fd34ba504 via range-diff
sr-gi:
utACK [2fd34ba](2fd34ba504)
theStack:
re-ACK 2fd34ba504
Tree-SHA512: 5071c5b8d9b8d2c9faa278c8c4df31de288cb407a68e4d55544c588caff6c86160cce7825453549c6ed69e29d9ccb5ee2d4a518b18f563bfb12f2ced073fe42a
542e13b293 rpc: Enhance metadata of the dumptxoutset output (Fabian Jahr)
4d8e5edbaa assumeutxo: Add documentation on dumptxoutset serialization format (Fabian Jahr)
c14ed7f384 assumeutxo: Add test for changed coin size value (Fabian Jahr)
de95953d87 rpc: Optimize serialization disk space of dumptxoutset (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
The second attempt at implementing the `dumptxoutset` space optimization as suggested in #25675. Closes#25675.
This builds on the work done in #26045, addresses open feedback, adds some further improvements (most importantly usage of compact size), documentation, and an additional test.
The [original snapshot at height 830,000](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29551) came in at 10.82 GB. With this change, the same snapshot is 8.94 GB, a reduction of 17.4%.
This also enhances the metadata of the output file and adds the following data to allow for better error handling and make future upgrades easier:
- A newly introduced utxo set magic
- A version number
- The network magic
- The block height
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 542e13b293
TheCharlatan:
Re-ACK 542e13b293
theStack:
ACK 542e13b293
Tree-SHA512: 0825d30e5c3c364062db3c6cbca4e3c680e6e6d3e259fa70c0c2b2a7020f24a47406a623582040988d5c7745b08649c31110df4c10656aa25f3f27eb35843d99
The behavior is not new, but this rule exits earlier than before.
Previously, a carve out could have been granted in PreChecks() but then
nullified in PackageMempoolChecks() when CheckPackageLimits() is called
with the default limits.
154b2b2296 [fuzz] V3_MAX_VSIZE and effective ancestor/descendant size limits (glozow)
a29f1df289 [policy] restrict all v3 transactions to 10kvB (glozow)
d578e2e354 [policy] explicitly require non-v3 for CPFP carve out (glozow)
Pull request description:
Opening for discussion / conceptual review.
We like the idea of a smaller maximum transaction size because:
- It lowers potential replacement cost (i.e. harder to do Rule 3 pinning via gigantic transaction)
- They are easier to bin-pack in block template production
- They equate to a tighter memory limit in data structures that are bounded by a number of transactions (e.g. orphanage and vExtraTxnForCompact). For example, the current memory bounds for orphanage is 100KvB * 100 = 40MB, and guaranteeing 1 tx per peer would require reserving a pretty large space.
History for `MAX_STANDARD_TX_WEIGHT=100KvB` (copied from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29873#issuecomment-2115459510):
- 2010-09-13 In 3df62878c3 satoshi added a 100kB (MAX_BLOCK_SIZE_GEN/5 with MBS_GEN = MAX_BLOCK_SIZE/2) limit on new transactions in CreateTransaction()
- 2013-02-04 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2273 In gavin gave that constant a name, and made it apply to transaction relay as well
Lowering `MAX_STANDARD_TX_WEIGHT` for all txns is not being proposed, as there are existing apps/protocols that rely on large transactions. However, it's been brought up that we should consider this for TRUCs (which is especially designed to avoid Rule 3 pinning).
This reduction should be ok because using nVersion=3 isn't standard yet, so this wouldn't break somebody's existing use case. If we find that this is too small, we can always increase it later. Decreasing would be much more difficult.
~[Expected size of a commitment transaction](https://github.com/lightning/bolts/blob/master/03-transactions.md#expected-weight-of-the-commitment-transaction) is within (900 + 172 * 483 + 224) / 4 = 21050vB~ EDIT: this is incorrect, but perhaps not something that should affect how we choose this number.
ACKs for top commit:
sdaftuar:
ACK 154b2b2296
achow101:
ACK 154b2b2296
instagibbs:
ACK 154b2b2296
t-bast:
ACK 154b2b2296
murchandamus:
crACK 154b2b2296
Tree-SHA512: 89392a460908a8ea9f547d90e00f5181de0eaa9d2c4f2766140a91294ade3229b3d181833cad9afc93a0d0e8c4b96ee2f5aeda7c50ad7e6f3a8320b9e0c5ae97
6629d1d0f8 test: improve robustness of connect_nodes() (furszy)
Pull request description:
Decoupled from #27837 because this can help other too, found it investigating a CI failure https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5805115213348864?logs=ci#L3200.
The `connect_nodes` function in the test framework relies on a stable number of peer
connections to verify that the new connection between the nodes is successfully established.
This approach is fragile, as any of the peers involved in the process can drop, lose, or
create a connection at any step, causing subsequent `wait_until` checks to stall indefinitely
even when the peers in question were connected successfully.
This commit improves the situation by using the nodes' subversion and the connection
direction (inbound/outbound) to identify the exact peer connection and perform the
checks exclusively on it.
ACKs for top commit:
stratospher:
reACK 6629d1d.
achow101:
ACK 6629d1d0f8
maflcko:
utACK 6629d1d0f8
AngusP:
re-ACK 6629d1d0f8
Tree-SHA512: 5f345c0ce49ea81b643e97c5cffd133e182838752c27592fcdeac14ad10919fb4b7ff38e289e42a7c3c638a170bd0d0b7a9cd493898997a2082a7b7ceef4aeeb
1e54d61c46 test: add coverage for `mapped_as` from `getrawaddrman` (brunoerg)
8c2714907d net: rpc: return peer's mapped AS in getrawaddrman (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds two new fields in `getrawaddrman` RPC: "mapped_as" and "source_mapped_as". These fields are used to return the ASN (Autonomous System Number) mapped to the peer and its source. With these informations we can have a better view of the bucketing logic with ASMap specially in projects like [addrman-observer](https://github.com/0xb10c/addrman-observer).
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Code review ACK 1e54d61c46
virtu:
ACK [1e54d61](1e54d61c46)
0xB10C:
ACK 1e54d61c46
glozow:
ACK 1e54d61c46
Tree-SHA512: af86bcc7a2e69bebd3fa9eaa2e527e0758c44c0a958de7292514d5f99f8f01f5df3bae11400451268e0255f738ff3acccc77f48fe129937512f1e9d9963c4c5e
Test addresses are being mapped according to the ASMap
file provided properly. Compare the result of the `getrawaddrman`
RPC with the result from the ASMap Health Check.
b3efb48673 protocol: make message types constexpr (Vasil Dimov)
2fa9de06c2 net: make the list of known message types a compile time constant (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
Turn the `std::vector` to `std::array` because it is cheaper and allows us to have the number of the messages as a compile time constant: `ALL_NET_MESSAGE_TYPES.size()` which can be used in future code to build other `std::array`s with that size.
---
This change is part of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29418 but it makes sense on its own and would be good to have it, regardless of the fate of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29418. Also, if this is merged, that would reduce the size of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29418, thus the current standalone PR.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK b3efb48673
jonatack:
ACK b3efb48673
maflcko:
utACK b3efb48673🎊
willcl-ark:
ACK b3efb48673
Tree-SHA512: 6d3860c138c64514ebab13d97ea67893e2d346dfac30a48c3d9bc769a1970407375ea4170afdb522411ced306a14a9af4eede99e964d1fb1ea3efff5d5eb57af
The 'connect_nodes' function in the test framework relies
on a stable number of peer connections to verify the new
connection between the nodes is successfully established.
This approach is fragile, as any of the peers involved in
the process can drop, lose, or create a connection at any
step, causing subsequent 'wait_until' checks to stall
indefinitely even when the peers in question are connected
successfully.
This commit improves the situation by using the nodes' subversion
and the connection direction (inbound/outbound) to identify the
exact peer connection and perform the checks exclusively on it.
d51fbab4b3 wallet, test: Be able to always swap BDB endianness (Ava Chow)
0b753156ce test: Test bdb_ro dump of wallet without reset LSNs (Ava Chow)
c1984f1282 test: Test dumping dbs with overflow pages (Ava Chow)
fd7b16e391 test: Test dumps of other endian BDB files (Ava Chow)
6ace3e953f bdb: Be able to make byteswapped databases (Ava Chow)
d9878903fb Error if LSNs are not reset (Ava Chow)
4d7a3ae78e Berkeley RO Database fuzz test (TheCharlatan)
3568dce9e9 tests: Add BerkeleyRO to db prefix tests (Ava Chow)
70cfbfdadf wallettool: Optionally use BERKELEY_RO as format when dumping BDB wallets (Ava Chow)
dd57713f6e Add MakeBerkeleyRODatabase (Ava Chow)
6e50bee67d Implement handling of other endianness in BerkeleyRODatabase (Ava Chow)
cdd61c9cc1 wallet: implement independent BDB deserializer in BerkeleyRODatabase (Ava Chow)
ecba230979 wallet: implement BerkeleyRODatabase::Backup (Ava Chow)
0c8e728476 wallet: implement BerkeleyROBatch (Ava Chow)
756ff9b478 wallet: add dummy BerkeleyRODatabase and BerkeleyROBatch classes (Ava Chow)
ca18aea5c4 Add AutoFile::seek and tell (Ava Chow)
Pull request description:
Split from #26596
This PR adds `BerkeleyRODatabase` which is an independent implementation of a BDB file parser. It provides read only access to a BDB file, and can therefore be used as a read only database backend for wallets. This will be used for dumping legacy wallet records and migrating legacy wallets without the need for BDB itself.
Wallettool's `dump` command is changed to use `BerkeleyRODatabase` instead of `BerkeleyDatabase` (and `CWallet` itself) to demonstrate that this parser works and to test it against the existing wallettool functional tests.
ACKs for top commit:
josibake:
reACK d51fbab4b3
TheCharlatan:
Re-ACK d51fbab4b3
furszy:
reACK d51fbab4b3
laanwj:
re-ACK d51fbab4b3
theStack:
ACK d51fbab4b3
Tree-SHA512: 1e7b97edf223b2974eed2e9eac1179fc82bb6359e0a66b7d2a0c8b9fa515eae9ea036f1edf7c76cdab2e75ad994962b134b41056ccfbc33b8d54f0859e86657b
8950053636 test: remove unneeded `-maxorphantx=1000` settings (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
It's unclear what the motivation for increasing the orphan pool is here, and it seems that this not needed at all. None of these tests involve orphan transactions explicitly, and if they would occur occasionally, there is no good reason to prefer a value of 1000 over the default of 100 (see DEFAULT_MAX_ORPHAN_TRANSACTIONS).
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
utACK 8950053636
edilmedeiros:
Tested ACK 8950053636
AngusP:
tACK 8950053636
glozow:
ACK 8950053636 From skimming the tests, it appears that none of these need a larger `-maxorphantx`.
Tree-SHA512: 81d4a4fb2ea92b97119f21cbc6c4b1240d863269932e6adf4982aead9726f20652523a4707add3ad38eb332d4452de41de6735265f22e62298f3b4b45de75a57
9365baa489 test: add conflicting topology test case (Greg Sanders)
Pull request description:
We want to ensure that even if topologies
that are acceptable are relaxed, like
removing package-not-child-with-unconfirmed-parents, that we don't end up accepting packages we shouldn't.
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
reACK 9365baa489
rkrux:
reACK [9365baa](9365baa489)
Tree-SHA512: d58661064ca099ac0447c331a5020c74c0cdfe24259aa875592805bbd63de1bf23aa7ced9ff485fef90dc0602fcb997e631aaf1aa2e9805d2cf5f0e5c9b2f0e2
It is best to store all key origin information
(master key fingerprint and all derivation steps)
in the multisig descriptor. Being explicit with
this information should be beneficial if this approach
is used with other wallets/signers (whether hardware
or software). There is no harm including all of this
with xpubs (if anything it simplifies the test code)
and makes this example/docs more complete and safer
incase it is referenced by others.
It's unclear what the motivation for increasing the orphan pool is, and
it seems that this not needed at all. None of these tests involve orphan
transactions explicitly, and if they would occur occasionally, there is
no good reason to prefer a value of 1000 over the default of 100 (see
DEFAULT_MAX_ORPHAN_TRANSACTIONS).
9408a04e42 tests, fuzz: use new NUMS_H const (josibake)
b946f8a4c5 crypto: add NUMS_H const (josibake)
Pull request description:
Broken out from #28122
---
[BIP341](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0341.mediawiki#constructing-and-spending-taproot-outputs) defines a NUMS point `H` as *H = lift_x(0x50929b74c1a04954b78b4b6035e97a5e078a5a0f28ec96d547bfee9ace803ac0)* which is [constructed](11af7015de/src/modules/rangeproof/main_impl.h (L16)) by taking the hash of the standard uncompressed encoding of the [secp256k1](https://www.secg.org/sec2-v2.pdf) base point G as X coordinate."
Add this as a constant so it can be used in our codebase. My primary motivation is BIP352 specifies a special case for when taproot spends use `H` as the internal key, but outside of BIP352 it seems generally useful to have `H` in the codebase, for testing or other use cases.
ACKs for top commit:
paplorinc:
re-ACK 9408a04e42
achow101:
ACK 9408a04e42
theStack:
Code-review ACK 9408a04e42
Tree-SHA512: ad84492f5d635c0cb05bd82546079ded7e5138e95361f20d8285a9ad6e69c10ee2cc3fe46e16b46ef03c4253c8bee1051911c6b91264c90c3b1ad33a824bff4b
Currently, we log the number of bytes of garbage when it is
generated. The log is a better fit for when the garbage
actually gets sent to the transport layer.
cbc6c440e3 doc: add comments and release-notes for JSON-RPC 2.0 (Matthew Zipkin)
e7ee80dcf2 rpc: JSON-RPC 2.0 should not respond to "notifications" (Matthew Zipkin)
bf1a1f1662 rpc: Avoid returning HTTP errors for JSON-RPC 2.0 requests (Matthew Zipkin)
466b90562f rpc: Add "jsonrpc" field and drop null "result"/"error" fields (Matthew Zipkin)
2ca1460ae3 rpc: identify JSON-RPC 2.0 requests (Matthew Zipkin)
a64a2b77e0 rpc: refactor single/batch requests (Matthew Zipkin)
df6e3756d6 rpc: Avoid copies in JSONRPCReplyObj() (Matthew Zipkin)
09416f9ec4 test: cover JSONRPC 2.0 requests, batches, and notifications (Matthew Zipkin)
4202c170da test: refactor interface_rpc.py (Matthew Zipkin)
Pull request description:
Closes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/2960
Bitcoin Core's JSONRPC server behaves with a special blend of 1.0, 1.1 and 2.0 behaviors. This introduces compliance issues with more strict clients. There are the major misbehaviors that I found:
- returning non-200 HTTP codes for RPC errors like "Method not found" (this is not a server error or an HTTP error)
- returning both `"error"` and `"result"` fields together in a response object.
- different error-handling behavior for single and batched RPC requests (batches contain errors in the response but single requests will actually throw HTTP errors)
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15495 added regression tests after a discussion in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15381 to kinda lock in our RPC behavior to preserve backwards compatibility.
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12435 was an attempt to allow strict 2.0 compliance behind a flag, but was abandoned.
The approach in this PR is not strict and preserves backwards compatibility in a familiar bitcoin-y way: all old behavior is preserved, but new rules are applied to clients that opt in. One of the rules in the [JSON RPC 2.0 spec](https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification#request_object) is that the kv pair `"jsonrpc": "2.0"` must be present in the request. Well, let's just use that to trigger strict 2.0 behavior! When that kv pair is included in a request object, the [response will adhere to strict JSON-RPC 2.0 rules](https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification#response_object), essentially:
- always return HTTP 200 "OK" unless there really is a server error or malformed request
- either return `"error"` OR `"result"` but never both
- same behavior for single and batch requests
If this is merged next steps can be:
- Refactor bitcoin-cli to always use strict 2.0
- Refactor the python test framework to always use strict 2.0 for everything
- Begin deprecation process for 1.0/1.1 behavior (?)
If we can one day remove the old 1.0/1.1 behavior we can clean up the rpc code quite a bit.
ACKs for top commit:
cbergqvist:
re ACK cbc6c440e3
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK cbc6c440e3. Just suggested changes since the last review: changing uncaught exception error code from PARSE_ERROR to MISC_ERROR, renaming a few things, and adding comments.
tdb3:
re ACK for cbc6c440e3
Tree-SHA512: 0b702ed32368b34b29ad570d090951a7aeb56e3b0f2baf745bd32fdc58ef68fee6b0b8fad901f1ca42573ed714b150303829cddad4a34ca7ad847350feeedb36
0fb17bf61a [log] updates in TxOrphanage (glozow)
b16da7eda7 [functional test] attackers sending mutated orphans (glozow)
6675f6428d [unit test] TxOrphanage handling of same-txid-different-witness txns (glozow)
8923edfc1f [p2p] allow entries with the same txid in TxOrphanage (glozow)
c31f148166 [refactor] TxOrphanage::EraseTx by wtxid (glozow)
efcc593017 [refactor] TxOrphanage::HaveTx only by wtxid (glozow)
7e475b9648 [p2p] don't query orphanage by txid (glozow)
Pull request description:
Part of #27463 in the "make orphan handling more robust" section.
Currently the main map in `TxOrphanage` is indexed by txid; we do not allow 2 transactions with the same txid into TxOrphanage. This means that if we receive a transaction and want to store it in orphanage, we'll fail to do so if a same-txid-different-witness version of the tx already exists in the orphanage. The existing orphanage entry can stay until it expires 20 minutes later, or until we find that it is invalid.
This means an attacker can try to block/delay us accepting an orphan transaction by sending a mutated version of the child ahead of time. See included test.
Prior to #28970, we don't rely on the orphanage for anything and it would be relatively difficult to guess what transaction will go to a node's orphanage. After the parent(s) are accepted, if anybody sends us the correct transaction, we'll end up accepting it. However, this is a bit more painful for 1p1c: it's easier for an attacker to tell when a tx is going to hit a node's orphanage, and we need to store the correct orphan + receive the parent before we'll consider the package. If we start out with a bad orphan, we can't evict it until we receive the parent + try the 1p1c, and then we'll need to download the real child, put it in orphanage, download the parent again, and then retry 1p1c.
ACKs for top commit:
AngusP:
ACK 0fb17bf61a
itornaza:
trACK 0fb17bf61a
instagibbs:
ACK 0fb17bf61a
theStack:
ACK 0fb17bf61a
sr-gi:
crACK [0fb17bf](0fb17bf61a)
stickies-v:
ACK 0fb17bf61a
Tree-SHA512: edcbac7287c628bc27036920c2d4e4f63ec65087fbac1de9319c4f541515d669fc4e5fdc30c8b9a248b720da42b89153d388e91c7bf5caf4bc5b3b931ded1f59
For JSON-RPC 2.0 requests we need to distinguish between
a missing "id" field and "id":null. This is accomplished
by making the JSONRPCRequest id property a
std::optional<UniValue> with a default value of
UniValue::VNULL.
A side-effect of this change for non-2.0 requests is that request which do not
specify an "id" field will no longer return "id": null in the response.
Avoid returning HTTP status errors for non-batch JSON-RPC 2.0 requests if the
RPC method failed but the HTTP request was otherwise valid. Batch requests
already did not return HTTP errors previously.
We want to ensure that even if topologies
that are acceptable are relaxed, like
removing package-not-child-with-unconfirmed-parents,
that we don't end up accepting packages we shouldn't.
e912717ff6 test: add missing comparison of node1's mempool in MempoolPackagesTest (umiumi)
Pull request description:
#29941 Recreated a pull request because there was a conflict. Trying to resolve the conflict but the old one automatically closed.
Add missing comparison for TODO comments in `mempool_packages.py`
Also, notice that the ancestor size limits and descendant size limits actually implemented in #21800 , so I removed the todo for those two size limits.
ACKs for top commit:
kevkevinpal:
ACK [e912717](e912717ff6)
achow101:
ACK e912717ff6
alfonsoromanz:
Tested ACK e912717ff6. The code looks good to me and the test execution is successful.
rkrux:
tACK [e912717](e912717ff6)
Tree-SHA512: 8cb51746b0547369344c9ceef59599bfe9c91d424687af5e24dc6641f9e99fb433515d79c724e71fd3d5e02994f0cef623d3674367b8296b05c3c6fcdde282ef
fd6a7d3a13 test: use sleepy wait-for-log in reindex readonly (Matthew Zipkin)
Pull request description:
Also rename the busy wait-for-log method to prevent recurrence. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27039#discussion_r1532578152
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
utACK fd6a7d3a13
achow101:
ACK fd6a7d3a13
tdb3:
ACK for fd6a7d3a13
rkrux:
ACK [fd6a7d3](fd6a7d3a13)
Tree-SHA512: 7ff0574833df1ec843159b35ee88b8bb345a513ac13ed0b72abd1bf330c454a3f9df4d927871b9e3d37bfcc07542b06ef63acef8e822cd18499adae8cbb0cda8
dd8fa86193 test: use tagged ephemeral MiniWallet instance in fill_mempool (Sebastian Falbesoner)
b2037ad4ae test: add MiniWallet tagging support to avoid UTXO mixing (Sebastian Falbesoner)
c8e6d08236 test: refactor: eliminate COINBASE_MATURITY magic number in fill_mempool (Sebastian Falbesoner)
4f347140b1 test: refactor: move fill_mempool to new module mempool_util (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Different MiniWallet instances using the same mode (either ADDRESS_OP_TRUE, RAW_OP_TRUE or RAW_P2PK) currently always create and spend UTXOs with identical output scripts, which can cause unintentional tx dependencies (see e.g. the discussion in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29827#discussion_r1565443465). In order to avoid mixing of UTXOs between instances, this PR introduces the possibility to provide a MiniWallet tag name, that is used to derive a different internal key for the taproot construction, leading to a different P2TR output script. Note that since we use script-path spending and only the key-path is changed here, no changes in the MiniWallet spending logic are needed.
The new tagging option is then used in the `fill_mempool` helper to create an ephemeral wallet for the filling txs, as suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29827#discussion_r1565964264. To avoid circular dependencies, `fill_mempool` is moved to a new module `mempool_util.py` first.
I'm still not sure if a generic word like "tag" is the right term for what this tries to achieve, happy to pick up better suggestions. Also, maybe passing a tag name is overkill and a boolean flag like "random_output_script" is sufficient?
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
ACK dd8fa86193
achow101:
ACK dd8fa86193
rkrux:
tACK [dd8fa86](dd8fa86193)
brunoerg:
utACK dd8fa86193
Tree-SHA512: 5ef3558c3ef5ac32cfa79c8f751972ca6bceaa332cd7daac7e93412a88e30dec472cb041c0845b04abf8a317036d31ebddfc3234e609ed442417894c2bdeeac9
d53d848347 test: adds outbound eviction tests for non outbound-full-relay peers (Sergi Delgado Segura)
a8d9a0edc7 test: adds outbound eviction functional tests, updates comment in ConsiderEviction (Sergi Delgado Segura)
Pull request description:
## Motivation
While checking the outbound eviction code I realized a case was not considered within the comments, which in turn made me realize we had no functional tests for the outbound eviction case (when I went to check/add the test case).
This PR updates the aforementioned comment and adds functional tests to cover the outbound eviction logic, in addition to the existing unit tests found at `src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp`.
ACKs for top commit:
davidgumberg:
reACK d53d848347
tdb3:
Re ACK for d53d848347
achow101:
ACK d53d848347
cbergqvist:
ACK d53d848347
Tree-SHA512: 633b84bb1229fe21e2f650c1beada33ca7f190b64eafd64df2266516d21175e5d652e019ff7114f00cb8bd19f5817dc19e65adf75767a88e24dc0842ce40c63e
b259b0e8d3 [Test] Assumeutxo: ensure failure when importing a snapshot twice (Alfonso Roman Zubeldia)
Pull request description:
I am getting familiar with the `assume_utxo` tests and I found that the scenario of trying to activate a snapshot twice is not covered. This test is to ensure failure when loading a snapshot if there is already a snapshot-based chainstate.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Code review ACK b259b0e8d3
kevkevinpal:
tACK [b259b0e](b259b0e8d3)
achow101:
ACK b259b0e8d3
rkrux:
tACK [b259b0e](b259b0e8d3)
Tree-SHA512: 3510861390d0e40cdad6861b728df04827a1b63e642f3d956aee66ed2770b1cb7e3aa3eb00c62eb9da0544703c943cc5296936c9ebfcac18c719741c354421bb
78e52f663f doc: rpc: fix submitpackage examples (stickies-v)
1a875d4049 rpc: update min package size error message in submitpackage (stickies-v)
f9ece258aa doc: rpc: submitpackage takes sorted array (stickies-v)
17f74512f0 test: add bounds checking for submitpackage RPC (stickies-v)
Pull request description:
`submitpackage` requires the package to be topologically sorted with the child being the last element in the array, but this is not documented in the RPC method or the error messages.
Also sneaking in some other minor improvements that I found while going through the code:
- Informing the user that `package` needs to be an array of length between `1` and `MAX_PACKAGE_COUNT` is confusing when `IsChildWithPackage()` requires that the package size >= 2. Remove this check to avoid code duplication and sending a confusing error message.
- fixups to the `submitpackage` examples
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
re-ACK 78e52f663f
instagibbs:
ACK 78e52f663f
achow101:
ACK 78e52f663f
glozow:
utACK 78e52f663f
Tree-SHA512: a8845621bb1cbf784167fc7c82cb8ceb105868b65b26d3465f072d1c04ef3699e85a21a524ade805d423bcecbc34f7d5bff12f2c21cbd902ae1fb154193ebdc9
98570fe29b test: add coverage for parsing cryptographically invalid pubkeys (Sebastian Falbesoner)
c740b154d1 rpc: use `HexToPubKey` helper for all legacy pubkey-parsing RPCs (Sebastian Falbesoner)
100e8a75bf rpc: check and throw specific pubkey parsing errors in `HexToPubKey` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Parsing legacy public keys can fail for three reasons (in this order):
- pubkey is not in hex
- pubkey has an invalid length (not 33 or 65 bytes for compressed/uncompressed, respectively)
- pubkey is crytographically invalid, i.e. is not on curve (`CPubKey.IsFullyValid()` check)
Many RPCs currently perform these checks manually with different error messages, even though we already have a `HexToPubKey` helper. This PR puts all three checks in this helper (the length check was done on the call-sites before), adds specific error messages for each case, and consequently uses it for all RPCs that parse legacy pubkeys. This leads to deduplicated code and also to more consistent and detailed error messages for the user.
Affected RPC calls are `createmultisig`, `addmultisigaddress`, `importpubkey`, `importmulti`, `fundrawtransaction`, `walletcreatefundedpsbt`, `send` and `sendall`.
Note that the error code (-5 a.k.a. `RPC_INVALID_ADDRESS_OR_KEY`) doesn't change in any of the causes, so the changes are not breaking RPC API compatibility. Only the messages are more specific.
The last commits adds test coverage for the cryptographically invalid (not-on-curve) pubkey case which wasn't exercised before.
ACKs for top commit:
stratospher:
tested ACK 98570fe.
davidgumberg:
ACK 98570fe29b
Eunovo:
Tested ACK 98570fe29b
achow101:
ACK 98570fe29b
Tree-SHA512: cfa474176e95b5b18f3a9da28fdd9e87195cd58994c1331198f2840925fff322fd323a6371feab74a1b32e4b9ea58a6dc732fa751b4cdd45402c1029af609ece
ee67bba76c test: added test coverage to loadtxoutset (kevkevin)
Pull request description:
The functional test coverage did not cover the rpc error of "Couldn't open file..." for loadtxoutset and this test adds coverage for it
This adds coverage to this line
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/rpc/blockchain.cpp#L2777
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
ACK ee67bba76c
davidgumberg:
LGTM ACK ee67bba76c
rkrux:
ACK [ee67bba](ee67bba76c)
alfonsoromanz:
ACK ee67bba76c. Code looks good to me. I also ran `test/functional/feature_assumeutxo.py` to make sure all tests passes, including this one.
tdb3:
ACK for ee67bba76c
Tree-SHA512: 210a7eb928f625d2a8d9acb63ee83cb4aaec9c267e5a0c52ad219c2935466e2cdc68667e30ad29566e6060981587e5bec42805d296f6e60f9b3b13f3330575f2
fa09451f8e Add lint check for bitcoin-config.h include IWYU pragma (MarcoFalke)
dddd40ba82 scripted-diff: Add IWYU pragma keep to bitcoin-config.h includes (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The `bitcoin-config.h` includes have issues:
* The header is incompatible with iwyu, because symbols may be defined or not defined. So the `IWYU pragma: keep` is needed to keep the include when a symbol is not defined on a platform. Compare the previous discussion in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29408#issuecomment-1948959711
* Guarding the includes by `HAVE_CONFIG_H` is verbose and brittle. Now that all build config dependencies have been removed from low level headers, the benefits are questionable, and the guard can be removed. The linter could also be tricked by guarding the include by `#if defined(HAVE_C0NFIG_H)` (`O` replaced by `0`). Compare the previous discussion in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29404#discussion_r1483189853 .
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fa09451f8e
TheCharlatan:
ACK fa09451f8e
hebasto:
re-ACK fa09451f8e, only rebased since my recent [review](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29494#pullrequestreview-2028864535) (`timedata.cpp` removed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29623).
Tree-SHA512: 47cb973f7f24bc625acc4e78683371863675d186780236d55d886cf4130e05a78bb04f1d731aae7088313b8e963a9677cc77cf518187dbd99d776f6421ca9b52
42fb5311b1 rpc: return warnings as an array instead of just a single one (stickies-v)
Pull request description:
The RPC documentation for `getblockchaininfo`, `getmininginfo` and `getnetworkinfo` states that "warnings" returns "any network and blockchain warnings". In practice, only a single warning (i.e. the latest one that is set) is returned, the other ones are ignored.
Fix that by returning all warnings as an array.
As a side benefit, clean up the GetWarnings() logic.
Since this PR changes the RPC result schema, I've added release notes. Users can temporarily revert to the old results by using `-deprecatedrpc=warnings`, until it's removed in a future version.
---
Some historical context from git log:
- when `GetWarnings` was introduced in 401926283a, it was used in the `getinfo` RPC, where only a [single error/warning was returned](401926283a (diff-7442c48d42cd5455a79915a0f00cce5e13359db46437a32b812876edb0a5ccddR250)) (similar to how it is now).
- later on, "warnings" RPC response fields were introduced, e.g. in ef2a3de25c, with the description [stating](ef2a3de25c (diff-1021bd3c74415ad9719bd764ad6ca35af5dfb33b1cd863c0be49bdf52518af54R411)) that it returned "any network warnings" but in practice still only a single warning was returned
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 42fb5311b1
tdb3:
Re ACK for 42fb5311b1
TheCharlatan:
ACK 42fb5311b1
maflcko:
ACK 42fb5311b1🔺
Tree-SHA512: 4225ed8979cd5f030dec785a80e7452a041ad5703445da79d2906ada983ed0bbe7b15889d663d75aae4a77d92e302c93e93eca185c7bd47c9cce29e12f752bd3
This exercises the bug fixed by previous commits, where
we were unable to generate and sign for segwit redeem scripts
(in this case multisig redeem scripts) longer than 520 bytes.
and also, this adds coverage for legacy 15-15 multisig script
generation and signing.
And also, simplified the test a bit by re-using the already existing 'wallet_multi'
(instead of creating a new one). Plus, removed the 'is_bdb_compiled()' calls
which were there basically to check if the test has the wallet compiled or not.
The function exists merely to check that the node2's wallet
received the transactions created during all the 'do_multisig()'
calls.
It was created as a standalone function because 'getbalance()'
only returns something when transactions are confirmed. So,
the rationale on that time was to have a method mining blocks
to confirm the recently created transactions to be able to
check the incoming balance.
This is why we have the "moved" class field.
This change removes all the hardcoded amounts and verifies
node2 balance reception directly inside 'do_multisig()'.
Cleaning up the test in the following ways:
* Generate priv-pub key pairs used for testing only once (instead of doing it 4 times).
* Simplifies 'wmulti' wallet creation, load and unload process.
* Removes confusing class members initialized and updated inside a nested for-loop.
* Simplifies do_multisig() outpoint detection:
The outpoint index information is already contained in MiniWallet's
`send_to` return value dictionary as "sent_vout".
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Falbesoner <sebastian.falbesoner@gmail.com>
ffc674595c Replace remaining "520" magic numbers with MAX_SCRIPT_ELEMENT_SIZE (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Noticed these while reviewing BIPs yesterday.
It would be clearer and more future-proof to refer to their constant name.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK ffc674595c
sipa:
ACK ffc674595c
achow101:
ACK ffc674595c
glozow:
ACK ffc674595c, agree it's clearer for these comments to refer to the greppable name of the limit rather than the number
Tree-SHA512: 462afc1c64543877ac58cb3acdb01d42c6d08abfb362802f29f3482d75401a2a8adadbc2facd222a9a9fefcaab6854865ea400f50ad60bec17831d29f7798afe
ec1f1abfef test:Validate UTXO snapshot with coin_height > base_height & amount > money_supply (jrakibi)
Pull request description:
### Ensure snapshot loading fails for coins exceeding base height
**Objective**: This test verifies that snapshot loading is correctly rejected for coins with a height greater than the base height.
**Update**:
- Added `test_invalid_snapshot_wrong_coin_code` to `feature_assumeutxo.py`.
- The test artificially sets a coin's height above 299 in a snapshot and checks for load failure.
- Edit: Added a test case for outputs whose amounts surpass the MAX_MONEY supply limit.
This implementation addresses the request for enhancing `assumeutxo` testing as outlined in issue #28648
---
**Edit: This is an explanation on how I arrive at content values: b"\x84\x58" and b"\xCA\xD2\x8F\x5A"**
You can use this tool to decode the utxo snapshot https://github.com/jrakibi/utxo-live
Here’s an overview of how it’s done:
The serialization format for a UTXO in the snapshot is as follows:
1. Transaction ID (txid) - 32 bytes
2. Output Index (outnum)- 4 bytes
3. VARINT (code) - A varible-length integer encoding the height and whether the transaction is a coinbase. The format of this VARINT is (height << 1) | coinbase_flag.
4. VARINT (amount_v) - A variable-length integer that represents a compressed format of the output amount (in satoshis).
For the test cases mentioned:
* **`b"\x84\x58"`** - This value corresponds to a VARINT representing the height and coinbase flag. Once we decode this code, we can extract the height and coinbase using `height = code_decoded >> 1` and `coinbase = code_decoded & 0x01`. In our case, with code_decoded = 728, it results in `height = 364` and `coinbase = 0`.
* **`b"\xCA\xD2\x8F\x5A"`** - This byte sequence represents a compressed amount value. The decompression function takes this value and translates it into a full amount in satoshis. In our case, the decompression of this amount translates to a number larger than the maximum allowed value of coins (21 million BTC)
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
re-ACK ec1f1abfef
maflcko:
ACK ec1f1abfef👑
achow101:
ACK ec1f1abfef
Tree-SHA512: 42b36fd1d76e9bc45861028acbb776bd2710c5c8bff2f75c751ed505995fbc1d4bc698df3be24a99f20bcf6a534615d2d9678fb3394162b88133eaec88ca2120
fa9be2f795 lint: [doc] Clarify Windows line endings (CR LF) not to be used (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
It has been this case since the linter was introduced years ago. Given a misunderstanding (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28074#issuecomment-2088028856), clarify the docs.
ACKs for top commit:
brunoerg:
ACK fa9be2f795
Tree-SHA512: be714db9df533e0962ed84102ffdb72717902949b930d58cf5a79cba36297f6b2b1f75e65a2c1f46bcb8e2f4ad5d025f3d15210f468a5ec9631a580b74f923ea
e504b1fa1f test: Add test case for spending bare multisig (Brandon Odiwuor)
Pull request description:
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29113
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK e504b1fa1f ; LGTM and just checking the 1-of-3 case seems fine
maflcko:
utACK e504b1fa1f
achow101:
ACK e504b1fa1f
willcl-ark:
reACK e504b1fa1f
Tree-SHA512: 641a12599efa34e1a3eb65b125318df326628fef3e6886410ea9e63a044664fad7bcad46d1d6f41ddc59630746b9963cedb569c2682b5940b32b9225883da8f2
The RPC documentation for `getblockchaininfo`, `getmininginfo` and
`getnetworkinfo` states that "warnings" returns "any network and
blockchain warnings". In practice, only a single warning is returned.
Fix that by returning all warnings as an array.
As a side benefit, cleans up the GetWarnings() logic.
c6be144c4b Remove timedata (stickies-v)
92e72b5d0d [net processing] Move IgnoresIncomingTxs to PeerManagerInfo (dergoegge)
7d9c3ec622 [net processing] Introduce PeerManagerInfo (dergoegge)
ee178dfcc1 Add TimeOffsets helper class (stickies-v)
55361a15d1 [net processing] Use std::chrono for type-safe time offsets (stickies-v)
038fd979ef [net processing] Move nTimeOffset to net_processing (dergoegge)
Pull request description:
[An earlier approach](1d226ae1f9/) in #28956 involved simplifying and refactoring the network-adjusted time calculation logic, but this was eventually [left out](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28956#issuecomment-1904214370) of the PR to make it easier for reviewers to focus on consensus logic changes.
Since network-adjusted time is now only used for warning/informational purposes, cleaning up the logic (building on @dergoegge's approach in #28956) should be quite straightforward and uncontroversial. The main changes are:
- Previously, we would only calculate the time offset from the first 199 outbound peers that we connected to. This limitation is now removed, and we have a proper rolling calculation. I've reduced the set to 50 outbound peers, which seems plenty.
- Previously, we would automatically use the network-adjusted time if the difference was < 70 mins, and warn the user if the difference was larger than that. Since there is no longer any automated time adjustment, I've changed the warning threshold to ~~20~~ 10 minutes (which is an arbitrary number).
- Previously, a warning would only be raised once, and then never again until node restart. This behaviour is now updated to 1) warn to log for every new outbound peer for as long as we appear out of sync, 2) have the RPC warning toggled on/off whenever we go in/out of sync, and 3) have the GUI warn whenever we are out of sync (again), but limited to 1 messagebox per 60 minutes
- no more globals
- remove the `-maxtimeadjustment` startup arg
Closes#4521
ACKs for top commit:
sr-gi:
Re-ACK [c6be144](c6be144c4b)
achow101:
reACK c6be144c4b
dergoegge:
utACK c6be144c4b
Tree-SHA512: 1063d639542e882186cdcea67d225ad1f97847f44253621a8c4b36c4d777e8f5cb0efe86bc279f01e819d33056ae4364c3300cc7400c087fb16c3f39b3e16b96
e518a8bf8a [functional test] opportunistic 1p1c package submission (glozow)
87c5c524d6 [p2p] opportunistically accept 1-parent-1-child packages (glozow)
6c51e1d7d0 [p2p] add separate rejections cache for reconsiderable txns (glozow)
410ebd6efa [fuzz] break out parent functions and add GetChildrenFrom* coverage (glozow)
d095316c1c [unit test] TxOrphanage::GetChildrenFrom* (glozow)
2f51cd680f [txorphanage] add method to get all orphans spending a tx (glozow)
092c978a42 [txpackages] add canonical way to get hash of package (glozow)
c3c1e15831 [doc] restore comment about why we check if ptx HasWitness before caching rejected txid (glozow)
6f4da19cc3 guard against MempoolAcceptResult::m_replaced_transactions (glozow)
Pull request description:
This enables 1p1c packages to propagate in the "happy case" (i.e. not reliable if there are adversaries) and contains a lot of package relay-related code. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27463 for overall package relay tracking.
Rationale: This is "non-robust 1-parent-1-child package relay" which is immediately useful.
- Relaying 1-parent-1-child CPFP when mempool min feerate is high would be a subset of all package relay use cases, but a pretty significant improvement over what we have today, where such transactions don't propagate at all. [1]
- Today, a miner can run this with a normal/small maxmempool to get revenue from 1p1c CPFP'd transactions without losing out on the ones with parents below mempool minimum feerate.
- The majority of this code is useful for building more featureful/robust package relay e.g. see the code in #27742.
The first 2 commits are followups from #29619:
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29619#discussion_r1523094034
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29619#discussion_r1519819257
Q: What makes this short of a more full package relay feature?
(1) it only supports packages in which 1 of the parents needs to be CPFP'd by the child. That includes 1-parent-1-child packages and situations in which the other parents already pay for themselves (and are thus in mempool already when the package is submitted). More general package relay is a future improvement that requires more engineering in mempool and validation - see #27463.
(2) We rely on having kept the child in orphanage, and don't make any attempt to protect it while we wait to receive the parent. If we are experiencing a lot of orphanage churn (e.g. an adversary is purposefully sending us a lot of transactions with missing inputs), we will fail to submit packages. This limitation has been around for 12+ years, see #27742 which adds a token bucket scheme for protecting package-related orphans at a limited rate per peer.
(3) Our orphan-handling logic is somewhat opportunistic; we don't make much effort to resolve an orphan beyond asking the child's sender for the parents. This means we may miss packages if the first sender fails to give us the parent (intentionally or unintentionally). To make this more robust, we need receiver-side logic to retry orphan resolution with multiple peers. This is also an existing problem which has a proposed solution in #28031.
[1]: see this writeup and its links 02ec218c78/bip-0331.mediawiki (propagate-high-feerate-transactions)
ACKs for top commit:
sr-gi:
tACK e518a8bf8a
instagibbs:
reACK e518a8bf8a
theStack:
Code-review ACK e518a8bf8a📦
dergoegge:
light Code review ACK e518a8bf8a
achow101:
ACK e518a8bf8a
Tree-SHA512: 632579fbe7160cb763bbec6d82ca0dab484d5dbbc7aea90c187c0b9833b8d7c1e5d13b8587379edd3a3b4a02a5a1809020369e9cd09a4ebaf729921f65c15943
f8a141c2da test: Don't rely on incentive incompatible replacement in mempool_accept_v3.py (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
In the sibling eviction test, we're currently testing that a transaction with ancestor feerate (and mining score) of 179 s/b is able to replace a transaction with ancestor feerate (and mining score) of 300 s/b, due to a shortcoming in our current RBF rules.
In preparation for fixing our RBF rules to not allow such replacements, fix the test by bumping the fee of the replacement to be a bit higher.
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
ACK f8a141c2da
instagibbs:
ACK f8a141c2da
Tree-SHA512: 0babe60be2f41634301e434fedb7abc765daaa37c2c280acb569eaf02a793369d81401ab02b8ae1689bda4872f475bd4c2f48cae4a54a61ece20db0a014e23ac
f19f0a2e5a test: Run framework unit tests in parallel (tdb3)
Pull request description:
Functional test framework unit tests are currently run prior to all other functional tests.
This PR enables execution of the test framework unit tests in parallel with the functional tests, rather than before the functional tests, saving runtime and more efficiently using available cores.
This is a follow up to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29470#issuecomment-1962313977
### New behavior:
1) When running all tests, the framework unit tests are run in parallel with the other tests (unless explicitly skipped with `--exclude`). This parallelization introduces marginal time savings when running all tests, depending on the machine used. As an example, a 2-3% time savings (9 seconds) was observed on a machine using `--jobs=18` (with 18 available cores).
2) When running specific functional tests, framework unit tests are now skipped by default. Framework unit tests can be added by including `feature_framework_unit_tests.py` in the list of specific tests being executed. The rationale for skipping by default is that if the tester is running specific functional tests, there is a conscious decision to focus testing, and choosing to run all tests (where unit tests are run by default) would be a next step.
3) The `--skipunit` option is now removed since unit tests are parallelized (they no longer delay other tests). Unit tests are treated equally as functional tests.
### Implementation notes:
Since `TextTestRunner` can be noisy (even with verbosity=0, and therefore trigger job failure through the presence of non-failure stderr output), the approach taken was to send output to stdout, and forward test result (as determined by `TestResult` returned). This aligns with the previous check for unit test failure (`if not result.wasSuccessful():`).
This approach was tested by inserting `self.assertEquals(True, False)` into test_framework/address.py and seeing specifics of the failure reported.
```
135/302 - feature_framework_unit_tests.py failed, Duration: 0 s
stdout:
.F
======================================================================
FAIL: test_bech32_decode (test_framework.address.TestFrameworkScript.test_bech32_decode)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/dev/myrepos/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/address.py", line 228, in test_bech32_decode
self.assertEqual(True, False)
AssertionError: True != False
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 2 tests in 0.003s
FAILED (failures=1)
stderr:
```
There was an initial thought to parallelize the execution of the unit tests themselves (i.e. run the 12 unit test files in parallel), however, this is not anticipated to further reduce runtime meaningfully and is anticipated to add unnecessary complexity.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
ACK f19f0a2e5a🌽
achow101:
ACK f19f0a2e5a
kevkevinpal:
Approach ACK f19f0a2e5a
Tree-SHA512: ab9f82c30371b2242bc7a263ea0e25d35e68e2ddf223d2a55498ad940d1e5b73bba76cce8b264d71e2ed31b753430d8ef8d57efc1e4fd9ced7fb845e27f4f47e
Peer protection is only given to outbound-full-relay peers. Add a negative
test to check that other type of outbound peers are not given protection under
the circumstances that outbound-full-relay would
3e9c736a26 test: fix accurate multisig sigop count (BIP16), add unit test (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
In the course of reviewing #29589 I noticed the following buggy call-site of `CScriptOp.decode_op_n` in the CScript's `GetSigOpCount` method:
4cc99df44a/test/functional/test_framework/script.py (L591-L593)
This should be `lastOpcode` rather than `opcode`. The latter is either OP_CHECKMULTISIG or OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY at this point, so `decode_op_n` would result in an error. Also, in `CScript.raw_iter`, we have to return the op as `CScriptOp` type instead of a bare integer, otherwise we can't call the decode method on it. To prevent this in the future, add some simple unit tests for `GetSigOpCount`.
Note that this was unnoticed, as the code part was never hit so far in the test framework.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 3e9c736a26
Christewart:
ACK 3e9c736a26
rkrux:
tACK [3e9c736](3e9c736a26)
hernanmarino:
tACK 3e9c736a26
Tree-SHA512: 51647bb6d462fbd101effd851afdbd6ad198c0567888cd4fdcac389a9fb4bd3d7e648095c6944fd8875d36272107ebaabdc62d0e2423289055588c12294d05a7
c4f857cc30 test: Extends wait_for_getheaders so a specific block hash can be checked (Sergi Delgado Segura)
Pull request description:
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18614
Previously, `wait_for_getheaders` would check whether a node had received **any** getheaders message. This implied that, if a test needed to check for a specific block hash within a headers message, it had to make sure that it was checking the desired message. This normally involved having to manually clear `last_message`. This method, apart from being too verbose, was error-prone, given an undesired `getheaders` would make tests pass.
This adds the ability to check for a specific block_hash within the last `getheaders` message.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK c4f857cc30
BrandonOdiwuor:
crACK c4f857cc30
cbergqvist:
ACK c4f857cc30
stratospher:
tested ACK c4f857c. went through all getheaders messages sent in the tests and checked that it's the one we want.
Tree-SHA512: afc9a31673344dfaaefcf692ec2ab65958c3d4c005f5f3af525e9960f0622d8246d5311e59aba06cfd5c9e0ef9eb90a7fc8e210f030bfbe67b897c061efdeed1
3bf4f8db66 lint: scripted-diff verification also requires GNU grep (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
I noticed while trying to verify all historical `scripted-diff:` commits on macOS that some scripts require GNU sed.
For example 0d6d2b650d uses `git grep --perl-regexp`.
ACKs for top commit:
hernanmarino:
cr ACK 3bf4f8db66
maflcko:
utACK 3bf4f8db66
achow101:
ACK 3bf4f8db66
alfonsoromanz:
Tested ACK 3bf4f8db66
kristapsk:
cr utACK 3bf4f8db66
Tree-SHA512: 09a060ab1bafad03df60d0f20c3dd1451850868dbd66ea38b18178b6230c1f06cf48622db82d9c51422d5689962ee0cd7aae0a31f84bd6d878215e6d73c1d47e
fa6ab0d020 rpc: Reword SighashFromStr error message (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Put quotes around the parameter. In theory, `std::quoted` should be used, but that seems overkill.
This should avoid error messages such as `A valid sighash parameter is not a valid sighash parameter. (code -8)`.
Also, it should fix fuzz false positives when searching for internal bugs in the `rpc` fuzz target. For example, `ZGVzY3JpcHRvcnByb2Nlc3Nwc2J0XP9ce1tdXOVJbnRlcm5hbCBidWcgZGV0ZWN0ZWQAXQ0AHfcAXQ1p7TJv`.
ACKs for top commit:
dergoegge:
ACK fa6ab0d020
brunoerg:
utACK fa6ab0d020
Tree-SHA512: e2c0cc0126de61873a863af38b7b0a23d2dadd596ca0418dae2ad091e8acfb6a9d657c376d59187bb008989dc78c6b44fe518590e5217e4049a867b220c9fb18
Reorganize functional test framework unit tests to run in parallel
with other functional tests.
The option `skipunit` is removed, since unit tests no longer delay
functional test execution.
Unit tests are run by default when running all tests, and can be
run explicitly with `feature_framework_unit_tests.py` when running
a subset of tests.
4357158c47 wallet: return and display signer error (Sjors Provoost)
dc55531087 wallet: compare address returned by displayaddress (Sjors Provoost)
6c1a2cc09a test: use h marker for external signer mock (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
* HWI returns the requested address: as a sanity check, we now compare that to what we expected
* external signer documentation now reflects that HWI alternatives must implement this check
* both RPC and GUI will now return an error text, rather than just fail (the GUI even failed silently in some cases)
ACKs for top commit:
brunoerg:
ACK 4357158c47
achow101:
ACK 4357158c47
Tree-SHA512: 4f56edf3846745c8e7d08ef55cf29e8bb468256457149377c5f02da097931f9ca0c06bdbd856dc2385cde4fd11e4dc3b634c5a48814ff27f5562c8a25d43da93
e30e8625bb test: remove duplicated ban test (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
Test the ban list is preserved through restart has been done by both `rpc_setban` and `p2p_disconnect_ban`. Since `p2p_disconnect_ban` does it in a more elegant way, we can keep only it and remove the other one.
bf1b6383db/test/functional/p2p_disconnect_ban.py (L74-L110)
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK e30e8625bb
tdb3:
ACK for e30e8625bb.
hernanmarino:
tested ACK e30e8625bb
BrandonOdiwuor:
ACK e30e8625bb
alfonsoromanz:
ACK e30e8625bb
Tree-SHA512: e89624f23011e6ffd76c31b2933b8386711e1d2c03366d6b3ea850484a4fd571f69971cdbc75ce2f546d541cb3fc7f4d495a5a011217d879746414e3286ac111
6d91cb781c test: add unit tests for `calculate_input_weight` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
f81fad5e0f test: introduce and use `calculate_input_weight` helper (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Rather than manually estimating an input's weight by adding up all the involved components (fixed-size skeleton, compact-serialized lengths, and the actual scriptSig / witness stack items) we can simply take use of the serialization classes `CTxIn` / `CTxInWitness` instead, to achieve the same with significantly less code.
The new helper is used in the functional tests rpc_psbt.py and wallet_send.py, where the previous manual estimation code was
duplicated. Unit tests are added in the second commit.
ACKs for top commit:
kevkevinpal:
tACK [6d91cb7](6d91cb781c)
QureshiFaisal:
tACK [6d91cb7](6d91cb781c)
achow101:
ACK 6d91cb781c
AngusP:
tACK 6d91cb781c
rkrux:
tACK [6d91cb7](6d91cb781c)
Tree-SHA512: 04424e4d94d0e13745a9c11df2dd3697c98552bbb0e792c4af67ecbb66060adc3cc0cefc202cdee2d9db0baf85b8bedf2eb339ac4b316d986b5f10f6b70c5a33
You can use this tool to decode the utxo snapshot https://github.com/jrakibi/utxo-live
Here’s an overview of how it’s done:
The serialization forma for a UTXO in the snapshot is as follows:
1. Transaction ID (txid) - 32 bytes
2. Output Index (outnum)- 4 bytes
3. VARINT (code) - A varible-length integer encoding the height and whether the transaction is a coinbase. The format of this VARINT is (height << 1) | coinbase_flag.
4. VARINT (amount_v) - A variable-length integer that represents a compressed format of the output amount (in satoshis).
For the test cases mentioned:
* b"\x84\x58" - This value corresponds to a VARINT representing the height and coinbase flag. Once we decode this code, we can extract the height and coinbase using height = code_decoded >> 1 and coinbase = code_decoded & 0x01. In our case, with code_decoded = 728, it results in height = 364 and coinbase = 0.
* b"\xCA\xD2\x8F\x5A" - This byte sequence represents a compressed amount value. The decompression function takes this value and translates it into a full amount in satoshis. In our case, the decompression of this amount translates to a number larger than the maximum allowed value of coins (21 million BTC)
test:Validate UTXO snapshot with coin_height > base_height & amount > money_supply
test:Validate UTXO snapshot with coin_height > base_height & amount > money_supply
fa6c300a99 test: Fix intermittent timeout in p2p_tx_download.py (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Currently the test passes, but may fail during shutdown, because blocks and transactions are synced with `NUM_INBOUND` * `self.num_nodes` peers, which may take a long time.
There is no need for this test to have this amount of inbounds.
So avoid the extraneous inbounds to speed up the test and avoid the intermittent test failures.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK fa6c300a99
fjahr:
Thanks, ACK fa6c300a99
achow101:
ACK fa6c300a99
theStack:
ACK fa6c300a99
Tree-SHA512: 0a480fd1db293ed8571ae629557cf81d5a79ec883e9e635f22c8a7cf48427161249ad2180b66c67661306f696c977b8e06ad520bd11911f119c9c95b3ffc9134
6b02c11d66 test: Fix intermittent issue in p2p_handshake.py (stratospher)
Pull request description:
When establishing outbound connections [`TestNode` --------> `P2PConnection`], `P2PConnection` listens for a single connection from `TestNode` on a [port which is fixed based on `p2p_idx`](312f54278f/test/functional/test_framework/p2p.py (L746)).
If we reuse the same port when disconnecting and establishing connections again, we might hit this scenario where:
- disconnection is done on python side for `P2PConnection`
- disconnection not complete on c++ side for `TestNode`
- we're trying to establish a new connection on same port again
Prevent this scenario from happening by ensuring disconnection on c++ side for TestNode as well.
One way to reproduce this on master would be adding a sleep statement before disconnection happens on c++ side.
```diff
diff --git a/src/net.cpp b/src/net.cpp
index e388f05b03..62507d1f39 100644
--- a/src/net.cpp
+++ b/src/net.cpp
@@ -2112,6 +2112,7 @@ void CConnman::SocketHandlerConnected(const std::vector<CNode*>& nodes,
if (!pnode->fDisconnect) {
LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "socket closed for peer=%d\n", pnode->GetId());
}
+ std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::milliseconds(1000));
pnode->CloseSocketDisconnect();
}
else if (nBytes < 0)
```
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 6b02c11d66
mzumsande:
Tested ACK 6b02c11d66
BrandonOdiwuor:
Tested ACK 6b02c11d66
theStack:
Tested ACK 6b02c11d66
glozow:
ACK 6b02c11d66
Tree-SHA512: 69509edb61ba45739fd585b6cc8a254f412975c124a5b5a52688288ecaaffd264dd76019b8290cc34c26c3ac2dfe477965ee5a11d7aabdd8e4d2a75229a4a068
21d0e6c7b7 doc: release notes for PR 27679 (Matthew Zipkin)
791dea204e test: cover unix sockets in zmq interface (Matthew Zipkin)
c87b0a0ff4 zmq: accept unix domain socket address for notifier (Matthew Zipkin)
Pull request description:
This is a follow-up to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27375, allowing ZMQ notifications to be published to a UNIX domain socket.
Fortunately, libzmq handles unix sockets already, all we really have to do to support it is allow the format in the actual option.
[libzmq](https://libzmq.readthedocs.io/en/latest/zmq_ipc.html) uses the prefix `ipc://` as opposed to `unix:` which is [used by Tor](https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor/-/blob/main/doc/man/tor.1.txt?ref_type=heads#L1475) and now also by [bitcoind](a85e5a7c9a/doc/release-notes-27375.md (L5)) so we need to switch that internally.
As far as I can tell, [LND](d20a764486/zmq.go (L38)) supports `ipc://` and `unix://` (notice the double slashes).
With this patch, LND can connect to bitcoind using unix sockets:
Example:
*bitcoin.conf*:
```
zmqpubrawblock=unix:/tmp/zmqsb
zmqpubrawtx=unix:/tmp/zmqst
```
*lnd.conf*:
```
bitcoind.zmqpubrawblock=ipc:///tmp/zmqsb
bitcoind.zmqpubrawtx=ipc:///tmp/zmqst
```
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 21d0e6c7b7
tdb3:
crACK for 21d0e6c7b7. Changes lgtm. Will follow up with some testing within the next few days as time allows.
achow101:
ACK 21d0e6c7b7
guggero:
Tested and code review ACK 21d0e6c7b7
Tree-SHA512: ffd50222e80dd029d903e5ddde37b83f72dfec1856a3f7ce49da3b54a45de8daaf80eea1629a30f58559f4b8ded0b29809548c0638cd1c2811b2736ad8b73030
60ca5d5508 test: p2p: add test for rejected tx request logic (`m_recent_rejects` filter) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
e9dc511a7e fixup: get all utxos up front in fill_mempool, discourage wallet mixing (glozow)
Pull request description:
Motivated by the discussion in #28970 (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28970#discussion_r1553911167), this PR adds test coverage for the logic around the `m_recent_rejects` filter, in particular that the filter is cleared after a new block comes in:
f0794cbd40/src/net_processing.cpp (L2199-L2206)
As expected, the second part of the test fails if the following patch is applied:
```diff
diff --git a/src/net_processing.cpp b/src/net_processing.cpp
index 6996af38cb..5cb1090e70 100644
--- a/src/net_processing.cpp
+++ b/src/net_processing.cpp
@@ -2202,7 +2202,7 @@ bool PeerManagerImpl::AlreadyHaveTx(const GenTxid& gtxid)
// or a double-spend. Reset the rejects filter and give those
// txs a second chance.
hashRecentRejectsChainTip = m_chainman.ActiveChain().Tip()->GetBlockHash();
- m_recent_rejects.reset();
+ //m_recent_rejects.reset();
}
const uint256& hash = gtxid.GetHash();
```
I'm still not sure in which file this test fits best, and if there is already test coverage for the first part of the test somewhere. Happy for any suggestions.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
ACK 60ca5d5508🍳
glozow:
code review ACK 60ca5d5508
instagibbs:
ACK 60ca5d5508
Tree-SHA512: 9cab43858e8f84db04a708151e6775c9cfc68c20ff53096220eac0b2c406f31aaf9223e8e04be345e95bf0a3f6dd15efac50b0ebeb1582a48a4560b3ab0bcba5
If we reuse the same port when disconnecting and establishing connections
again, we might hit this scenario:
- disconnection is done on python side for P2PConnection
- disconnection is not complete on c++ side for TestNode
- we're trying to establish a new connection on same port again
Prevent this scenario from happening by ensuring disconnection on c++
side for TestNode as well.
1ae5b208d3 test: fix intermittent failure in p2p_compactblocks_hb.py (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
Fixes#29860
As a result of node1 receiving a block, it sends out SENDCMPCT messages to some of its peers to update the high-bandwidth status. We need to wait until those are received and processed by the peers to avoid intermittent failures. Before, we'd only wait until all peers have synced with the new block (within `generate`) which is not sufficient.
I could reproduce the failure by adding a `std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::milliseconds(1000));` sleep to the [net_processing code](c7567d9223/src/net_processing.cpp (L3763)) that processes `NetMsgType::SENDCMPCT`.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK 1ae5b208d3
alfonsoromanz:
Tested ACK 1ae5b208d3
glozow:
ACK 1ae5b208d3
Tree-SHA512: 47c29616e73a5e0ff966fc231e4f672c1a6892511e5c10a3905b30ad6b2a3d1267fa0a88bd8f64b523fe580199d22a43545c84e361879e5096483152065c4b9a
b7ba60f81a test: add coverage for -reindex and assumeutxo (Martin Zumsande)
e57f951805 init, validation: Fix -reindex option with an existing snapshot (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
In c711ca186f logic was introduced that `-reindex` and `-reindex-chainstate` will delete the snapshot chainstate.
This doesn't work currently, instead of deleting the snapshot chainstate the node crashes with an assert (this can be triggered by applying the added test commit on master).
Fix this, and another bug that would prevent the new active chainstate from having a mempool after `-reindex` has deleted the snapshot (also covered by the test).
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
re-ACK b7ba60f81a
hernanmarino:
crACK b7ba60f81a . Good fix
BrandonOdiwuor:
re-ACK b7ba60f81a
byaye:
Tested ACK b7ba60f81a
Tree-SHA512: c168f36997d7677d590af37b10427870f5d30123abf1c76032a16661e486735373bfa7e049e6aca439526fbcb6d619f970bf9d042196c851bf058a75a32fafdc
As a result of node1 receiving a block, it sends out
SENDCMPCT messages to its peers to update the status.
We need to wait until those are received and
processed by the peers to avoid intermittent failures.
Both RPC and GUI now render a useful error message instead of (silently) failing.
Replace bool with util::Result<void> to clarify that this either succeeds or returns an error message.
c2e0489b71 [rpc, bugfix] Enforce maximum value for setmocktime (dergoegge)
Pull request description:
The maximum value for our mocktime must be representable in nanoseconds, otherwise we end up with negative values returned from `NodeClock::now()`.
Found through fuzzing:
```
$ echo "c2V0bW9ja3RpbWVcZTptYf9w/3NldG3///////////////9p////ZP///ymL//////89////Nv9L////////LXkBAABpAA==" | base64 --decode > rpc-8cab9148ab4418ebd1923c213e9d3fe9c9b49b39.crash
$ FUZZ=rpc ./src/test/fuzz/fuzz rpc-8cab9148ab4418ebd1923c213e9d3fe9c9b49b39.crash
fuzz_libfuzzer: util/time.cpp:28: static NodeClock::time_point NodeClock::now(): Assertion `ret > 0s' failed.
```
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
re-ACK c2e0489b71
brunoerg:
crACK c2e0489b71
glozow:
ACK c2e0489b71
Tree-SHA512: d7e237ca37bedd74a6b085fb6e726a142705371044c77488f593f35afe70aeca756fdba86920294b1d322c7a9b2cde9ce4e1b7d410a6ccc1fd7c6f3a6e77200a
A common issue that our fuzzers keep finding is that outpoints don't
exist in the non witness utxos. Instead of trying to track this down and
checking in various individual places, do the check early during
deserialization.
4ba1d0b553 fuzz: Add coverage for client_maxfeerate (Greg Sanders)
91d7d8f22a AcceptMultipleTransactions: Fix workspace client_maxfeerate (Greg Sanders)
f3aa5bd5eb fill_mempool: assertions and docsctring update (Greg Sanders)
a3da63e8fe Move fill_mempool to util function (Greg Sanders)
73b68bd8b4 fill_mempool: remove subtest-specific comment (Greg Sanders)
Pull request description:
Bug causes an `Assume()` failure due to the expectation that the individual result should be invalid when done over `submitpackage` via rpc.
Bug introduced by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28950 , and I discovered it rebasing https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28984 since it's easier to hit in that test scenario.
Tests in place were only checking `AcceptSingleTransaction`-level checks due to package evaluation only triggering when minfee is too high for the parent transaction.
Added test along with fix, moving the fill_mempool utility into a common area for re-use.
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
reACK 4ba1d0b553
theStack:
ACK 4ba1d0b553
ismaelsadeeq:
re-ACK 4ba1d0b553 via [diff](4fe7d150eb..4ba1d0b553)
Tree-SHA512: 3729bdf7f25d04e232f173ccee04ddbb2afdaafa3d04292a01cecf58fb11b3b2bc133e8490277f1a67622b62d17929c242dc980f9bb647896beea4332ee35306
This helper class is an alternative to CMedianFilter, but without a
lot of the special logic and exceptions that we needed while it was
still used for consensus.
d5a715536e build: remove boost::process dependency for building external signer support (Sebastian Falbesoner)
70434b1c44 external_signer: replace boost::process with cpp-subprocess (Sebastian Falbesoner)
cc8b9875b1 Add `cpp-subprocess` header-only library (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Closes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/24907.
This PR is based on **theStack**'s [work](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/24907#issuecomment-1466087049).
The `subprocess.hpp` header has been sourced from the [upstream repo](https://github.com/arun11299/cpp-subprocess) with the only modification being the removal of convenience functions, which are not utilized in our codebase.
Windows-related changes will be addressed in subsequent follow-ups.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
reACK d5a715536e
Sjors:
re-tACK d5a715536e
theStack:
Light re-ACK d5a715536e
fanquake:
ACK d5a715536e - with the expectation that this code is going to be maintained as our own. Next PRs should:
Tree-SHA512: d7fb6fecc3f5792496204190afb7d85b3e207b858fb1a75efe483c05260843b81b27d14b299323bb667c990e87a07197059afea3796cf218ed8b614086bd3611
47cedee776 fuzz: Introduce `BITCOINFUZZ` environment variable (Hennadii Stepanov)
1573e9a11e fuzz, refactor: Deduplicate fuzz binary path creation (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
These changes are split from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29774 and can be beneficial on their own.
The new `BITCOINFUZZ` environment variable complements the already existing set of variables used by tests: b5d21182e5/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py (L238-L243)
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 47cedee776
davidgumberg:
utACK 47cedee776
Tree-SHA512: 45809cfd13dc4a45c44cc433184352e84726cb95bea80fd8f581c59a0b8b0a5495260ff66922f9c57c38adbdbdd102439238f370fd49d6ea27a241a5e6249895
d4e36ae80d test: Update --tmpdir doc string to say directory must not exist (kevkevin)
Pull request description:
The error message given if passing an existing dir to --tmpdir is confusing so this makes it clear that the directory must not already exist
This change is motivated by this comment https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29335#issuecomment-1960913020
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK d4e36ae80d
davidgumberg:
ACK d4e36ae80d
Tree-SHA512: fb31fd079767abbf94076615817943f35f5c9262fc97e65c631a18d33b3a343fe6a2d151613256e632d2b372ab2de0435f4712309b4a77ed3c663fd93a7dcdd1
93fae5ae7c test: remove immediate tx relay workaround in wallet_groups.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Reverts commit ab4efad51b (PR #26970). This workaround is not needed anymore, as since #27114 the test sets the noban permission for both in- and outbound connections via the `noban_tx_relay` setting, and we don't have to rely on this topology hack anymore. See commit c985eb854c (kudos to brunoerg!).
Can be tested by executing `$ time ./test/functional/wallet_groups.py` both on master and PR and verifying that the execution time is roughly equal.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 93fae5ae7c
brunoerg:
utACK 93fae5ae7c
Tree-SHA512: b949fd05b4308815ba02d0ee4d1318f642b930288dd03223f46db7db745177af1c070bc7058743ac27963c5ad90564089867cc12f31fee94812a16919c353bab
49c0b8b228 test: Bump timeouts in feature_index_prune and wallet_importdescriptors (Christopher Bergqvist)
Pull request description:
Timeout issues where encountered when running functional tests with `--jobs=16 --extended`.
Note that running `--extended` without `--jobs=16` does not trigger the issues.
Tested under NixOS on a Xeon CPU with 16 logical cores.
(A few tests are skipped locally as I haven't enabled BPF and a few other things).
## Measurements
Line in `feature_index_prune.py` took 101.6s, 96.6s, 103.0s across 3 runs on my machine.
Default limit is 60, suggested to increase limit to 150 seconds.
Line in the `wallet_importdescriptors.py --descriptors` took 5.4s, 5.7s, 6.0s across 3 runs.
Suggested to increase from 5 to 10 seconds.
## Logs
Output slightly modified by separate change that lets code run past given timeouts and the provides more information - "Took 101.6 seconds to complete, 69.4% over the given limit.".
<details>
<summary>
Click to expand.
</summary>
### feature_index_prune.py
```
52/305 - feature_index_prune.py failed, Duration: 250 s
stdout:
2024-04-01T22:25:24.010000Z TestFramework (INFO): PRNG seed is: 990421162716295219
2024-04-01T22:25:24.014000Z TestFramework (INFO): Initializing test directory /mnt/tmp/test_runner_₿_🏃_20240402_002516/feature_index_prune_302
2024-04-01T22:25:24.913000Z TestFramework (INFO): check if we can access blockfilters and coinstats when pruning is enabled but no blocks are actually pruned
2024-04-01T22:26:48.417000Z TestFramework (INFO): prune some blocks
2024-04-01T22:26:48.460000Z TestFramework (INFO): check if we can access the tips blockfilter and coinstats when we have pruned some blocks
2024-04-01T22:26:48.483000Z TestFramework (INFO): check if we can access the blockfilter and coinstats of a pruned block
2024-04-01T22:26:59.175000Z TestFramework (INFO): make sure trying to access the indices throws errors
2024-04-01T22:27:50.422000Z TestFramework (INFO): prune exactly up to the indices best blocks while the indices are disabled
2024-04-01T22:27:52.596000Z TestFramework (INFO): make sure that we can continue with the partially synced indices after having pruned up to the index height
2024-04-01T22:29:34.242000Z TestFramework.utils (ERROR): wait_until() failed. Predicate: '''
self.wait_until(lambda: self.nodes[1].getindexinfo() == expected_stats)#, timeout=150)
'''
2024-04-01T22:29:34.244000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Assertion failed
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/chris/Documents/Code/bitcoin-core/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 132, in main
self.run_test()
File "/home/chris/Documents/Code/bitcoin-core/test/functional/feature_index_prune.py", line 117, in run_test
self.sync_index(height=1500)
File "/home/chris/Documents/Code/bitcoin-core/test/functional/feature_index_prune.py", line 34, in sync_index
self.wait_until(lambda: self.nodes[1].getindexinfo() == expected_stats)#, timeout=150)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/home/chris/Documents/Code/bitcoin-core/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 780, in wait_until
return wait_until_helper_internal(test_function, timeout=timeout, timeout_factor=self.options.timeout_factor)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/home/chris/Documents/Code/bitcoin-core/test/functional/test_framework/util.py", line 305, in wait_until_helper_internal
raise AssertionError(m)
AssertionError: Predicate '''
self.wait_until(lambda: self.nodes[1].getindexinfo() == expected_stats)#, timeout=150)
''' not true after 60 seconds. Took 101.6 seconds to complete, 69.4% over the given limit.
2024-04-01T22:29:34.298000Z TestFramework (INFO): Stopping nodes
2024-04-01T22:29:34.511000Z TestFramework (WARNING): Not cleaning up dir /mnt/tmp/test_runner_₿_🏃_20240402_002516/feature_index_prune_302
2024-04-01T22:29:34.511000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Test failed. Test logging available at /mnt/tmp/test_runner_₿_🏃_20240402_002516/feature_index_prune_302/test_framework.log
2024-04-01T22:29:34.511000Z TestFramework (ERROR):
2024-04-01T22:29:34.512000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Hint: Call /home/chris/Documents/Code/bitcoin-core/test/functional/combine_logs.py '/mnt/tmp/test_runner_₿_🏃_20240402_002516/feature_index_prune_302' to consolidate all logs
2024-04-01T22:29:34.512000Z TestFramework (ERROR):
2024-04-01T22:29:34.512000Z TestFramework (ERROR): If this failure happened unexpectedly or intermittently, please file a bug and provide a link or upload of the combined log.
2024-04-01T22:29:34.512000Z TestFramework (ERROR): https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues
2024-04-01T22:29:34.512000Z TestFramework (ERROR):
stderr:
53/305 - p2p_blockfilters.py passed, Duration: 130 s
```
### wallet_importdescriptors.py --descriptors
```
297/305 - wallet_importdescriptors.py --descriptors failed, Duration: 76 s
stdout:
2024-04-01T22:48:27.663000Z TestFramework (INFO): PRNG seed is: 8528678505617325332
2024-04-01T22:48:27.664000Z TestFramework (INFO): Initializing test directory /mnt/tmp/test_runner_₿_🏃_20240402_004231/wallet_importdescriptors_98
2024-04-01T22:48:28.021000Z TestFramework (INFO): Setting up wallets
2024-04-01T22:48:28.100000Z TestFramework (INFO): Mining coins
2024-04-01T22:48:29.714000Z TestFramework (INFO): Import should fail if a descriptor is not provided
2024-04-01T22:48:29.725000Z TestFramework (INFO): Should import a p2pkh descriptor
2024-04-01T22:48:29.740000Z TestFramework (INFO): Test can import same descriptor with public key twice
2024-04-01T22:48:29.760000Z TestFramework (INFO): Test can update descriptor label
2024-04-01T22:48:29.785000Z TestFramework (INFO): Internal addresses cannot have labels
2024-04-01T22:48:29.788000Z TestFramework (INFO): Internal addresses should be detected as such
2024-04-01T22:48:29.854000Z TestFramework (INFO): Should not import a p2sh-p2wpkh descriptor without checksum
2024-04-01T22:48:29.855000Z TestFramework (INFO): Should not import a p2sh-p2wpkh descriptor that has range specified
2024-04-01T22:48:29.858000Z TestFramework (INFO): Should not import a p2sh-p2wpkh descriptor and have it set to active
2024-04-01T22:48:29.860000Z TestFramework (INFO): Should import a (non-active) p2sh-p2wpkh descriptor
2024-04-01T22:48:29.984000Z TestFramework (INFO): Should import a 1-of-2 bare multisig from descriptor
2024-04-01T22:48:30.002000Z TestFramework (INFO): Should not treat individual keys from the imported bare multisig as watchonly
2024-04-01T22:48:30.005000Z TestFramework (INFO): Ranged descriptors cannot have labels
2024-04-01T22:48:30.014000Z TestFramework (INFO): Private keys required for private keys enabled wallet
2024-04-01T22:48:30.027000Z TestFramework (INFO): Ranged descriptor import should warn without a specified range
2024-04-01T22:48:30.065000Z TestFramework (INFO): Should not import a ranged descriptor that includes xpriv into a watch-only wallet
2024-04-01T22:48:30.070000Z TestFramework (INFO): Should not import a descriptor with hardened derivations when private keys are disabled
2024-04-01T22:48:30.108000Z TestFramework (INFO): Verify we can only extend descriptor's range
2024-04-01T22:48:30.364000Z TestFramework (INFO): Check we can change descriptor internal flag
2024-04-01T22:48:30.536000Z TestFramework (INFO): Key ranges should be imported in order
2024-04-01T22:48:30.708000Z TestFramework (INFO): Check we can change next_index
2024-04-01T22:48:30.838000Z TestFramework (INFO): Check imported descriptors are not active by default
2024-04-01T22:48:30.870000Z TestFramework (INFO): Check can activate inactive descriptor
2024-04-01T22:48:30.903000Z TestFramework (INFO): Check can deactivate active descriptor
2024-04-01T22:48:30.924000Z TestFramework (INFO): Verify activation state is persistent
2024-04-01T22:48:30.973000Z TestFramework (INFO): Should import a descriptor with a WIF private key as spendable
2024-04-01T22:48:30.987000Z TestFramework (INFO): Test can import same descriptor with private key twice
2024-04-01T22:48:32.173000Z TestFramework (INFO): Test that multisigs can be imported, signed for, and getnewaddress'd
2024-04-01T22:48:43.803000Z TestFramework (INFO): Multisig with distributed keys
2024-04-01T22:48:48.895000Z TestFramework (INFO): We can create and use a huge multisig under P2WSH
2024-04-01T22:49:05.628000Z TestFramework (INFO): Under P2SH, multisig are standard with up to 15 compressed keys
2024-04-01T22:49:20.258000Z TestFramework (INFO): Amending multisig with new private keys
2024-04-01T22:49:23.306000Z TestFramework (INFO): Combo descriptors cannot be active
2024-04-01T22:49:23.313000Z TestFramework (INFO): Descriptors with no type cannot be active
2024-04-01T22:49:23.348000Z TestFramework (INFO): Test importing a descriptor to an encrypted wallet
2024-04-01T22:49:43.957000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Assertion failed
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/chris/Documents/Code/bitcoin-core/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 132, in main
self.run_test()
File "/home/chris/Documents/Code/bitcoin-core/test/functional/wallet_importdescriptors.py", line 691, in run_test
with self.nodes[0].assert_debug_log(expected_msgs=["Rescan started from block 0f9188f13cb7b2c71f2a335e3a4fc328bf5beb436012afca590b1a11466e2206... (slow variant inspecting all blocks)"], timeout=5):#10):
File "/nix/store/rac8pxbi1vapwrlqzbrkycbyg521djzw-python3-3.11.6/lib/python3.11/contextlib.py", line 144, in __exit__
next(self.gen)
File "/home/chris/Documents/Code/bitcoin-core/test/functional/test_framework/test_node.py", line 493, in assert_debug_log
self._raise_assertion_error(f'Expected messages "{expected_msgs}" found too late, took {now - start:.1f} seconds, {((now - start) / (time_end - start)) - 1:.1%} over the given limit. Log:\n\n{print_log}\n\n')
File "/home/chris/Documents/Code/bitcoin-core/test/functional/test_framework/test_node.py", line 188, in _raise_assertion_error
raise AssertionError(self._node_msg(msg))
AssertionError: [node 0] Expected messages "['Rescan started from block 0f9188f13cb7b2c71f2a335e3a4fc328bf5beb436012afca590b1a11466e2206... (slow variant inspecting all blocks)']" found too late, took 5.4 seconds, 8.9% over the given limit. Log:
- 2024-04-01T22:49:33.066512Z [http] [httpserver.cpp:306] [http_request_cb] [http] Received a POST request for /wallet/encrypted_wallet from 127.0.0.1:47658
- 2024-04-01T22:49:33.066668Z [httpworker.0] [rpc/request.cpp:187] [parse] [rpc] ThreadRPCServer method=importdescriptors user=__cookie__
- 2024-04-01T22:49:33.070999Z [httpworker.0] [wallet/sqlite.cpp:57] [TraceSqlCallback] [/mnt/tmp/test_runner_₿_🏃_20240402_004231/wallet_importdescriptors_98/node0/regtest/wallets/encrypted_wallet/wallet.dat] SQLite Statement: INSERT INTO main VALUES(?, ?)
- 2024-04-01T22:49:33.071061Z [httpworker.0] [wallet/sqlite.cpp:57] [TraceSqlCallback] [/mnt/tmp/test_runner_₿_🏃_20240402_004231/wallet_importdescriptors_98/node0/regtest/wallets/encrypted_wallet/wallet.dat] SQLite Statement: DELETE FROM main WHERE key = ?
- 2024-04-01T22:49:33.071137Z [httpworker.0] [wallet/sqlite.cpp:57] [TraceSqlCallback] [/mnt/tmp/test_runner_₿_🏃_20240402_004231/wallet_importdescriptors_98/node0/regtest/wallets/encrypted_wallet/wallet.dat] SQLite Statement: BEGIN TRANSACTION
- 2024-04-01T22:49:33.074190Z [httpworker.0] [wallet/sqlite.cpp:57] [TraceSqlCallback] [/mnt/tmp/test_runner_₿_🏃_20240402_004231/wallet_importdescriptors_98/node0/regtest/wallets/encrypted_wallet/wallet.dat] SQLite Statement: INSERT or REPLACE into main values(?, ?)
- 2024-04-01T22:49:33.075564Z [httpworker.0] [wallet/sqlite.cpp:57] [TraceSqlCallback] [/mnt/tmp/test_runner_₿_🏃_20240402_004231/wallet_importdescriptors_98/node0/regtest/wallets/encrypted_wallet/wallet.dat] SQLite Statement: INSERT or REPLACE into main values(?, ?)
...<thousands of almost identical lines>...
- 2024-04-01T22:49:38.416139Z [httpworker.0] [wallet/sqlite.cpp:57] [TraceSqlCallback] [/mnt/tmp/test_runner_₿_🏃_20240402_004231/wallet_importdescriptors_98/node0/regtest/wallets/encrypted_wallet/wallet.dat] SQLite Statement: INSERT or REPLACE into main values(?, ?)
- 2024-04-01T22:49:38.416528Z [httpworker.0] [wallet/sqlite.cpp:57] [TraceSqlCallback] [/mnt/tmp/test_runner_₿_🏃_20240402_004231/wallet_importdescriptors_98/node0/regtest/wallets/encrypted_wallet/wallet.dat] SQLite Statement: INSERT or REPLACE into main values(?, ?)
- 2024-04-01T22:49:38.427946Z [httpworker.0] [wallet/sqlite.cpp:57] [TraceSqlCallback] [/mnt/tmp/test_runner_₿_🏃_20240402_004231/wallet_importdescriptors_98/node0/regtest/wallets/encrypted_wallet/wallet.dat] SQLite Statement: COMMIT TRANSACTION
- 2024-04-01T22:49:38.429778Z [httpworker.0] [wallet/sqlite.cpp:57] [TraceSqlCallback] [/mnt/tmp/test_runner_₿_🏃_20240402_004231/wallet_importdescriptors_98/node0/regtest/wallets/encrypted_wallet/wallet.dat] SQLite Statement: INSERT or REPLACE into main values(?, ?)
- 2024-04-01T22:49:38.429916Z [httpworker.0] [wallet/sqlite.cpp:57] [TraceSqlCallback] [/mnt/tmp/test_runner_₿_🏃_20240402_004231/wallet_importdescriptors_98/node0/regtest/wallets/encrypted_wallet/wallet.dat] SQLite Statement: INSERT or REPLACE into main values(?, ?)
- 2024-04-01T22:49:38.430001Z [httpworker.0] [wallet/wallet.h:933] [WalletLogPrintf] [encrypted_wallet] Setting spkMan to active: id = c6149b35399517457b0b1d8ccdd7efda25a2f20fc7f8167adda8e79b10e260b7, type = legacy, internal = false
- 2024-04-01T22:49:38.430134Z [httpworker.0] [wallet/wallet.h:933] [WalletLogPrintf] [encrypted_wallet] RescanFromTime: Rescanning last 329 blocks
- 2024-04-01T22:49:38.430170Z [httpworker.0] [wallet/wallet.h:933] [WalletLogPrintf] [encrypted_wallet] Rescan started from block 0f9188f13cb7b2c71f2a335e3a4fc328bf5beb436012afca590b1a11466e2206... (slow variant inspecting all blocks)
- 2024-04-01T22:49:38.441914Z [httpworker.0] [wallet/scriptpubkeyman.h:258] [WalletLogPrintf] [encrypted_wallet] MarkUnusedAddresses: Detected a used keypool item at index 4000, mark all keypool items up to this item as used
2024-04-01T22:49:44.029000Z TestFramework (INFO): Stopping nodes
2024-04-01T22:49:44.132000Z TestFramework (WARNING): Not cleaning up dir /mnt/tmp/test_runner_₿_🏃_20240402_004231/wallet_importdescriptors_98
2024-04-01T22:49:44.132000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Test failed. Test logging available at /mnt/tmp/test_runner_₿_🏃_20240402_004231/wallet_importdescriptors_98/test_framework.log
2024-04-01T22:49:44.132000Z TestFramework (ERROR):
2024-04-01T22:49:44.133000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Hint: Call /home/chris/Documents/Code/bitcoin-core/test/functional/combine_logs.py '/mnt/tmp/test_runner_₿_🏃_20240402_004231/wallet_importdescriptors_98' to consolidate all logs
2024-04-01T22:49:44.133000Z TestFramework (ERROR):
2024-04-01T22:49:44.133000Z TestFramework (ERROR): If this failure happened unexpectedly or intermittently, please file a bug and provide a link or upload of the combined log.
2024-04-01T22:49:44.133000Z TestFramework (ERROR): https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues
2024-04-01T22:49:44.133000Z TestFramework (ERROR):
stderr:
Remaining jobs: [feature_pruning.py, feature_dbcrash.py, feature_assumeutxo.py, rpc_scantxoutset.py, feature_coinstatsindex.py, p2p_node_network_limited.py --v1transport, p2p_node_network_limited.py --v2transport, feature_config_args.py]
298/305 - p2p_node_network_limited.py --v1transport passed, Duration: 24 s
```
</details>
## Related
Almost identical timeout in `feature_index_prune.py` in #27091 on MacOS, and for `wallet_importdescriptors.py --descriptors` in #27282 on Alpine & CI.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 49c0b8b228
tdb3:
ACK for 49c0b8b228
itornaza:
approach ACK 49c0b8b228
BrandonOdiwuor:
crACK 49c0b8b228
Tree-SHA512: f62ade74701588d76bfe838b7e7bbda1db38fd98688fd5d13c2c008064027add2ee9d053dee602d84919fab4c9bf53183c31819d94a6174066f237d0f6a62086
Reverts commit ab4efad51b (PR #26970).
This workaround is not needed anymore, as since #27114 the test sets
the noban permission for both in- and outbound connections via the
`noban_tx_relay` setting, and we don't have to rely on these topology
hacks anymore. See commit c985eb854c.
The `BITCOINFUZZ` environment variable allows to override the default
path to the fuzz binary.
It complements the already existing set of variables used by tests:
- BITCOIND
- BITCOINCLI
- BITCOINUTIL
- BITCOINWALLET
Rather than manually estimating an input's weight by adding up all the
involved components (fixed-size skeleton, compact-serialized lengths,
and the actual scriptSig / witness stack items) we can simply take use
of the serialization classes `CTxIn` / `CTxInWitness` instead, to
achieve the same with significantly less code.
The new helper is used in the functional tests rpc_psbt.py and
wallet_send.py, where the previous manual estimation code was
duplicated.
Previously, `wait_for_getheaders` would check whether a node had received **any**
getheaders message. This implied that, if a test needed to check for a specific block
hash within a headers message, it had to make sure that it was checking the desired message.
This normally involved having to manually clear `last_message`. This method, apart from being
too verbose, was error prone, given an undesired `getheaders` would make tests pass.
This adds the ability to check for a specific block_hash within the last `getheaders` message.
Timeout issues where encountered when running functional tests with `--jobs=16 --extended`.
Line in `feature_index_prune.py` took 101.6s, 96.6s, 103.0s across 3 runs on my machine, default limit is 60.
Line in the `wallet_importdescriptors.py --descriptors` took 5.4s, 5.7s, 6.0s across 3 runs.
61560d5e93 test: makes timeout a forced named argument in tests methods that use it (Sergi Delgado Segura)
Pull request description:
This makes calls to such methods more explicit and less error-prone.
Motivated by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29736#discussion_r1540654057
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 61560d5e93
brunoerg:
ACK 61560d5e93
BrandonOdiwuor:
crACK 61560d5e93
AngusP:
ACK 61560d5e93
stratospher:
tested ACK 61560d5.
Tree-SHA512: 8d6ec3fe1076c868ddbd3050f3c242dbd83cc123f560db3d3b0ed74968e6050dc9ebf4e7c716af9cc1b290c97d736c2fc2ac936b0b69ebdbceed934dae7d55d9
2eb5175de8 test: fix StopIteration exception in p2p_node_network_limited.py (furszy)
Pull request description:
Fixes#29731
The `next()` call throws an exception if the default parameter is omitted and the iterator is exhausted.
Fix it by providing a default value.
The failure can be tested by commenting out lines 90 and 91 in the test (the `self.connect_nodes(2, 0)`). Since there is no connection, the node in question retrieves a single element in the 'getchaintips()' call. This scenario without the fix, aborts the test right away, throwing an `StopIteration` exception, and with the fix, the test properly waits until the timeout (`wait_until()` call).
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
review ACK 2eb5175de8
brunoerg:
crACK 2eb5175de8
BrandonOdiwuor:
crACK 2eb5175de8
tdb3:
Tested ACK for 2eb5175de8.
Tree-SHA512: b0873eb4d3334146fd250cd2cd23add3e744877033c8bfa4eb8dff36633100604adf49dd7846856ddfa88c9768663f095db705c00eef3641618df8fc13f8c2c5
601edd8ee8 ci: use codespell 2.2.6 (fanquake)
52fa0d285f doc: fix some typos (crazeteam)
b5ed13a240 doc: Fix typos (RoboSchmied)
Pull request description:
Combines the recent PRs to fix typos so they can be merged.
ACKs for top commit:
brunoerg:
crACK 601edd8ee8
tdb3:
crACK 601edd8ee8
kristapsk:
cr utACK 601edd8ee8
Tree-SHA512: d054b1dad1336d6b9291cc5d5252d4debf6424a993d4edd6a97d7c15055a7fc48a333d30967f72e7dc9c6c1d9a9038ca8bb5e219c529f4c2365ea48404a508d0
746b6d8839 test: Add test for createwalletdescriptor (Ava Chow)
2402b63062 wallet: Test upgrade of pre-taproot wallet to have tr() descriptors (Ava Chow)
460ae1bf67 wallet, rpc: Add createwalletdescriptor RPC (Ava Chow)
8e1a475062 wallet: Be able to retrieve single key from descriptors (Ava Chow)
85b1fb19dd wallet: Add GetActiveHDPubKeys to retrieve xpubs from active descriptors (Ava Chow)
73926f2d31 wallet, descspkm: Refactor wallet descriptor generation to standalone func (Andrew Chow)
54e74f46ea wallet: Refactor function for single DescSPKM setup (Andrew Chow)
3b09d0eb7f tests: Test for gethdkeys (Ava Chow)
5febe28c9e wallet, rpc: Add gethdkeys RPC (Ava Chow)
66632e5c24 wallet: Add IsActiveScriptPubKeyMan (Ava Chow)
fa6a259985 desc spkm: Add functions to retrieve specific private keys (Ava Chow)
fe67841464 descriptor: Be able to get the pubkeys involved in a descriptor (Ava Chow)
ef6745879d key: Add constructor for CExtKey that takes CExtPubKey and CKey (Ava Chow)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a `createwalletdescriptor` RPC which allows users to add new automatically generated descriptors to their wallet, e.g. to upgrade a 0.21.x wallet to contain a taproot descriptor. This RPC takes 3 arguments: the output type to create a descriptor for, whether the descriptor will be internal or external, and the HD key to use if the user wishes to use a specific key. The HD key is an optional parameter. If it is not specified, the wallet will use the key shared by the active descriptors, if they are all single key. For most users in the expected upgrade scenario, this should be sufficient. In more advanced cases, the user must specify the HD key to use.
Currently, specified HD keys must already exist in the wallet. To make it easier for the user to know, `gethdkeys` is also added to list out the HD keys in use by all of the descriptors in the wallet. This will include all HD keys, whether we have the private key, for it, which descriptors use it and their activeness, and optionally the extended private key. In this way, users with more complex wallets will be still be able to get HD keys from their wallet for use in other scenarios, and if they want to use `createwalletdescriptor`, they can easily get the keys that they can specify to it.
See also https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26728#issuecomment-1866961865
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-utACK 746b6d8839
furszy:
ACK 746b6d8
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 746b6d8839, and this looks ready to merge. There were various suggested changes since last review where main change seems to be switching `gethdkeys` output to use normalized descriptors (removing hardened path components).
Tree-SHA512: f2849101e6fbf1f59cb031eaaaee97af5b1ae92aaab54c5716940d210f08ab4fc952df2725b636596cd5747b8f5beb1a7a533425bc10d09da02659473516fbda
The `next()` call throws an exception if the default parameter is omitted and the iterator is exhausted.
Fix it by providing a default value.
The failure can be tested by commenting out lines 90 and 91 in the test (the `self.connect_nodes(2, 0)``).
Since there is no connection, the node in question retrieves a single element in the 'getchaintips()' call.
This scenario without the fix, aborts the test right away, throwing an StopIteration exception, and with
the fix, the test properly waits until the timeout (wait_until() call).
5952292133 wallet, rpc: show mempool conflicts in `gettransaction` result (ishaanam)
54e07ee22f wallet: track mempool conflicts (ishaanam)
d64922b590 wallet refactor: use CWalletTx member functions to determine tx state (ishaanam)
ffe5ff1fb6 scripted-diff: wallet: s/TxStateConflicted/TxStateBlockConflicted (ishaanam)
180973a941 test: Add tests for wallet mempool conflicts (ishaanam)
Pull request description:
The `mempool_conflicts` variable is added to `CWalletTx`, it is a set of txids of txs in the mempool conflicting with the wallet tx or a wallet tx's parent. This PR only changes how mempool-conflicted txs are dealt with in memory.
`IsSpent` now returns false for an output being spent by a mempool conflicted transaction where it previously returned true.
A txid is added to `mempool_conflicts` during `transactionAddedToMempool`. A txid is removed from `mempool_conflicts` during `transactionRemovedFromMempool`.
This PR also adds a `mempoolconflicts` field to the `gettransaction` wallet RPC result.
Builds on #27145
Second attempt at #18600
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 5952292133
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 5952292133. Just small suggested changes since last review
furszy:
ACK 59522921
Tree-SHA512: 615779606723dbb6c2e302681d8e58ae2052ffee52d721ee0389746ddbbcf4b4c4afacf01ddf42b6405bc6f883520524186a955bf6b628fe9b3ae54cffc56a29
Upstream repo: https://github.com/arun11299/cpp-subprocess
Commit: 4025693decacaceb9420efedbf4967a04cb028e7
The "Convenience Functions" section is unused in our codebase, so it has
been removed.
Test the ban list is preserved through restart has been
done by both `rpc_setban` and `p2p_disconnect_ban`.
Since `p2p_disconnect_ban` does it in a more elegant
way, we can keep only it and remove the duplicated one.
a8bfc3dea1 test: add coverage for bech32m in `wallet_keypool_topup` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
0dcac51049 added coverage for all keypool addresses types in `wallet_keypool_topup` (4y ago). Now we have bech23m, so this PR adds it.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK a8bfc3dea1
marcofleon:
ACK a8bfc3dea1. Definitely a more straightfoward addition to the test. Reviewed the code, built the PR branch and ran all functional tests without issues.
furszy:
utACK a8bfc3dea
Tree-SHA512: aa830b723a7a54b23744f9fb3cf5214452c4ffc8e3bbe0e8bd980bdf902e61c3dd2fd57361b82c5c0c5224aa0774158daf34b6b2188edda0a971f82111976051
fa1146d01b lint: Fix COMMIT_RANGE issues (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
`COMMIT_RANGE` has problems on forks or local branches:
* When `LOCAL_BRANCH` is set, it assumes the presence of a `master` branch, and that the `master` branch is up-to-date. Both of which may be false. (See also discussion in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29274#discussion_r1504226422)
* When `COMMIT_RANGE` isn't set in `lint-git-commit-check.py`, and `--prev-commits` isn't set either, it has the same (broken) assumptions.
Fix all issues by simply assuming a merge commit exists. This allows to drop `LOCAL_BRANCH`. It also allows to drop `SKIP_EMPTY_NOT_A_PR`, because scripts will already skip an empty range. Finally, it allows to drop `--prev-commits n`, because one can simply say `COMMIT_RANGE='HEAD~n..HEAD'` to achieve the same.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
tACK fa1146d01b
Tree-SHA512: f1477a38267fd4fdb8d396211a5d6bed5f418798c7edaba43487957aaf726cd45244ccf15187b3dd896d398fa1df3fe0a37323e49cf44d60a2018786ed41e5ba
The addpeeraddress calls can fail due to collisions. As we are using a
deteministic addrman, they won't fail with the current bucket/position
calculation. However, if the calculation is changed, they might collide
and fail silently causing tests using `seed_addrman()` to fail.
Assert that the addpeeraddress calls are successful.
824f47294a node: Use log levels in noui_ThreadSafeMessageBox (TheCharlatan)
ddc7872c08 node: Make translations of fatal errors consistent (TheCharlatan)
Pull request description:
The extra `bilingual_str` argument of the fatal error notifications and `node::AbortNode()` is often unused and when used usually contains the same string as the message argument. It also seems to be confusing, since it is not consistently used for errors requiring user action. For example some assumeutxo fatal errors require the user to do something, but are not translated.
So simplify the fatal error and abort node interfaces by only passing a translated string. This slightly changes the fatal errors displayed to the user.
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
re-ACK 824f47294a
maflcko:
ACK 824f47294a🔎
achow101:
ACK 824f47294a
hebasto:
re-ACK 824f47294a.
Tree-SHA512: 2868ee7b045fe7f3ac582ce5039141b398480b7627734976201dafaaef7544b8461635a7292fee4a7f32ff1bfc26f9bd4d0c292dca424ba42fb7fc4483d7ce8d
99954f914f test: fix test to ensure hidden RPC is present in detailed help (stratospher)
0d01f6f0c6 test: remove unused mocktime in test_addpeeraddress (0xb10c)
6205466512 rpc: "addpeeraddress tried" return error on failure (0xb10c)
Pull request description:
When trying to add an address to the IP address manager tried table, it's first added to the new table and then moved to the tried table. Previously, adding a conflicting address to the address manager's tried table with test-only `addpeeraddress tried=true` RPC would return `{ "success": true }`. However, the address would not be added to the tried table, but would remain in the new table. This caused, e.g., issue #28964.
This is fixed by new returning `{ "success": false, "error": "..." }` for failed tried table additions. Since the address remaining in the new table can't be removed (the address manager interface does not support removing addresses at the moment and adding this seems to be a bigger effort), an error message is returned. This indicates to a user why the RPC failed and allows accounting for the extra address in the new table. This is done in the functional test for the `getrawaddrman` RPC.
Fixes#28964
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 99954f914f
stratospher:
reACK 99954f9. 🚀
brunoerg:
utACK 99954f914f
Tree-SHA512: 2f1299410c0582ebc2071271ba789a8abed905f9a510821f77afbcf2a555ec31397578ea55cbcd162fb828be27afedd3246c7b13ad8883f2f745bb8e04364a76
The test requires that limited nodes are not peered with when
the node's system time exceeds ~ 24h of the node's chaintip
timestamp, as per PeerManagerImpl::GetDesirableServiceFlags.
By patching this test to modify the timestamp of the chaintip as
opposed to mocking the node's system time, we make it resilient
to future commits where the node raises a warning if it detects
its system time is too much out of sync with its outbound peers.
See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29623
The extra `bilingual_str` argument of the fatal error notifications and
`node::AbortNode()` is often unused and when used usually contains the
same string as the message argument. It also seems to be confusing,
since it is not consistently used for errors requiring user action. For
example some assumeutxo fatal errors require the user to do something,
but are not translated.
So simplify the fatal error and abort node interfaces by only passing a
translated string. This slightly changes the fatal errors displayed to
the user.
Also de-duplicate the abort error log since it is repeated in noui.cpp.
Behavior changes are:
- if a tx has a mempool conflict, the wallet will not attempt to
rebroadcast it
- if a txo is spent by a mempool-conflicted tx, that txo is no
longer considered spent
9d9a7458a2 assumeutxo: Remove BLOCK_ASSUMED_VALID flag (Ryan Ofsky)
ef174e9ed2 test: assumeutxo snapshot block CheckBlockIndex crash test (Ryan Ofsky)
0391458d76 test: assumeutxo stale block CheckBlockIndex crash test (Ryan Ofsky)
ef29c8b662 assumeutxo: Get rid of faked nTx and nChainTx values (Ryan Ofsky)
9b97d5bbf9 doc: Improve comments describing setBlockIndexCandidates checks (Ryan Ofsky)
0fd915ee6b validation: Check GuessVerificationProgress is not called with disconnected block (Ryan Ofsky)
63e8fc912c ci: add getchaintxstats ubsan suppressions (Ryan Ofsky)
f252e687ec assumeutxo test: Add RPC test for fake nTx and nChainTx values (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
The `PopulateAndValidateSnapshot` function introduced in f6e2da5fb7 from #19806 has been setting fake `nTx` and `nChainTx` values that can show up in RPC results (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29328) and make `CBlockIndex` state hard to reason about, because it is difficult to know whether the values are real or fake.
Revert to previous behavior of setting `nTx` and `nChainTx` to 0 when the values are unknown, instead of faking them. Also drop no-longer needed `BLOCK_ASSUMED_VALID` flag.
Dropping the faked values also fixes assert failures in the `CheckBlockIndex` `(pindex->nChainTx == pindex->nTx + prev_chain_tx)` check that could happen previously if forked or out-of-order blocks before the snapshot got submitted while the snapshot was being validated. The PR includes two commits adding tests for these failures and describing them in detail.
Compatibility note: This change could cause new `-checkblockindex` failures if a snapshot was loaded by a previous version of Bitcoin Core and not fully validated, because fake `nTx` values will have been saved to the block index. It would be pretty easy to avoid these failures by adding some compatibility code to `LoadBlockIndex` and changing `nTx` values from 1 to 0 when they are fake (when `(pindex->nStatus & BLOCK_VALID_MASK) < BLOCK_VALID_TRANSACTIONS`), but a little simpler not to worry about being compatible in this case.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-ACK 9d9a7458a2
achow101:
ACK 9d9a7458a2
mzumsande:
Tested ACK 9d9a7458a2
maflcko:
ACK 9d9a7458a2🎯
Tree-SHA512: b1e1e2731ec36be30d5f5914042517219378fc31486674030c29d9c7488ed83fb60ba7095600f469dc32f0d8ba79c49ff7706303006507654e1762f26ee416e0
dfcef536d0 blockstorage: do not flush block to disk if it is already there (Matthew Zipkin)
Pull request description:
Closes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/2039
When reindexing from flat-file block storage there is no need to write anything back to disk, since the block data is already there. This PR skips flushing to disk those blocks that already have a known position in the datastore. Skipping this means that users can write-protect the `blk` files on disk which may be useful for security or even safely sharing that data between multiple bitcoind instances.
`FindBlockPos()` may also flush the undo data file, but again this is skipped if the corresponding block position is known, like during the initial stage of a reindex when block data is being indexed. Once the block index is complete the validation mechanism will call `ConnectBlock()` which will save undo data at that time.
The call stack looks like this:
```
init()
ThreadImport() <-- process fReindex flag
LoadExternalBlockFile()
AcceptBlock()
SaveBlockToDisk()
FindBlockPos()
FlushBlockFile() <-- unnecessary if block is already on disk
```
A larger refactor of this part of the code was started by mzumsande here: https://github.com/mzumsande/bitcoin/tree/202207_refactor_findblockpos including this fix, reviewers can let me know if the changes should be combined.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK dfcef536d0
mzumsande:
re-ACK dfcef536d0
achow101:
ACK dfcef536d0
furszy:
Rebase diff ACK dfcef53.
Tree-SHA512: 385c5ac1288b325135398d0ddd3ab788fa98cc0ca19bd2474c74039f2ce70d5088c1d1c9d4dd10aefcbd4c757767ec5805d07ba8cee9289a66f96e6f9eaa5279
2f23987849 test: p2p: check limited peers desirability (depending on best block depth) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
c4a67d396d test: p2p: check disconnect due to lack of desirable service flags (Sebastian Falbesoner)
405ac819af test: p2p: support disconnect waiting for `add_outbound_p2p_connection` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds missing test coverage for disconnecting peers which don't offer the desirable service flags in their VERSION message:
5f3a0574c4/src/net_processing.cpp (L3384-L3389)
This check is relevant for the connection types "outbound-full-relay", "block-relay-only" and "addr-fetch" (see `CNode::ExpectServicesFromConn(...)`). Feeler connections always disconnect, which is also tested here.
In lack of finding a proper file where this test would fit in, I created a new one. Happy to take suggestions there.
ACKs for top commit:
davidgumberg:
reACK 2f23987849
itornaza:
tested ACK 2f23987849
fjahr:
re-utACK 2f23987849
cbergqvist:
re ACK 2f23987849
stratospher:
tested ACK 2f23987. 🚀
Tree-SHA512: cf75d9d4379d0f34fa1e13152e6a8d93cd51b9573466ab3a2fec32dc3e1ac49b174bd1063cae558bc736b111c8a6e7058b1b57a496df56255221bf367d29eb5d
current check to make sure that detailed help for hidden RPC
is displayed won't work because the assertion isn't sufficient.
Even if unknown RPCs are passed, RPC names would still be present
in node.help().
Drops the mocktime added in fa4c6836c9.
Setting the mocktime in test_addpeeraddress() isn't needed
anymore as it doesn't leak into test_getrawaddrman() anymore
(since 2cc8ca19f4).
test_getrawaddrman() clear's the addrman and sets it's own
mocktime.
When trying to add an address to the IP address manager tried table,
it's first added to the new table and then moved to the tried table.
Previously, adding a conflicting address to the address manager's
tried table with test-only `addpeeraddress tried=true` RPC would
return `{ "success": true }`. However, the address would not be added
to the tried table, but would remain in the new table. This caused,
e.g., issue 28964.
This is fixed by returning `{ "success": false, "error":
"failed-adding-to-tried" }` for failed tried table additions. Since
the address remaining in the new table can't be removed (the address
manager interface does not support removing addresses at the moment
and adding this seems to be a bigger effort), an error message is
returned. This indicates to a user why the RPC failed and allows
accounting for the extra address in the new table.
Also:
To check the number of addresses in each addrman table,
the addrman checks were re-run and the log output of this check
was asserted. Ideally, logs shouldn't be used as an interface
in automated tests. To avoid asserting the logs, use the getaddrmaninfo
and getrawaddrman RPCs (which weren't implemented when the test was added).
Removing the "getnodeaddress" calls would also remove the addrman checks
from the test, which could reduce the test coverage. To avoid this,
these are kept.
432a542e27 test: fix intermittent failures with test=addrman (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
The `nKey` of the addrman is generated the first time the node is started with an empty `peers.dat`. Therefore, restarting a node or turning it off and on again won't make a previously non-deterministic addrman deterministic.
This could lead to intermittent failures in `feature_asmap.py` and `rpc_net.py`
Fixes#29634
ACKs for top commit:
kevkevinpal:
ACK [432a542](432a542e27)
stratospher:
Tested ACK 432a542e27.
brunoerg:
crACK 432a542e27
0xB10C:
ACK 432a542e27
Tree-SHA512: a8e284baeb0be2df7284b8a2792cb9edc9e2d5b877a3b29ab7277ffdb75b17efa58a4d42576441eb493cd518e7c5ffdb05597b27e42b5001cf1a80e78bb04c83
38f70ba6ac RPC: Add maxfeerate and maxburnamount args to submitpackage (Greg Sanders)
Pull request description:
Resolves https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28949
I couldn't manage to do it very cleanly outside of (sub)package evaluation itself, since it would change the current interface very heavily. Instead I threaded through the max fee argument and used that directly via ATMPArgs. From that perspective, this is somewhat a reversion from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19339. In a post-cluster mempool world, these checks could be consolidated to right after the given (ancestor) package is linearized/chunked, by just checking the feerate of the top chunk and rejecting the submission entirely if the top chunk is too high.
The implication here is that subpackages can be submitted to the mempool prior to hitting this new fee-based error condition.
ACKs for top commit:
ismaelsadeeq:
Re-ACK 38f70ba6ac👍🏾
glozow:
ACK 38f70ba6ac with some non-blocking nits
murchandamus:
LGTM, code review ACK 38f70ba6ac
Tree-SHA512: 38212aa9de25730944cee58b0806a3d37097e42719af8dd7de91ce86bb5d9770b6f7c37354bf418bd8ba571c52947da1dcdbb968bf429dd1dbdf8715315af18f
Add a test for a CheckBlockIndex crash that would happen before previous
"assumeutxo: Get rid of faked nTx and nChainTx values" commit.
The crash was an assert failure in the (pindex->nChainTx == pindex->nTx +
prev_chain_tx) check that would previously happen if the snapshot block was
submitted after loading the snapshot and downloading a few blocks after the
snapshot. In that case ReceivedBlockTransactions() previously would overwrite
the nChainTx value of the submitted snapshot block with a fake value based on
the previous block, so the (pindex->nChainTx == pindex->nTx + prev_chain_tx)
check would later fail on the first block after the snapshot. This test was
originally posted by Martin Zumsande <mzumsande@gmail.com> in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29370#issuecomment-1974096225
Co-authored-by: Martin Zumsande <mzumsande@gmail.com>
Add a test for a CheckBlockIndex crash that would happen before previous
"assumeutxo: Get rid of faked nTx and nChainTx values" commit.
The crash was an assert failure in the (pindex->nChainTx == pindex->nTx +
prev_chain_tx) check that would previously happen if a snapshot was loaded, and
a block was submitted which forked from the chain before the snapshot block and
after the last downloaded background chain block. This block would not be
marked assumed-valid because it would not be an ancestor of the snapshot, and
it would have nTx set, nChainTx unset, and prev->nChainTx set with a fake
value, so the assert would fail. After the fix, prev->nChainTx is unset instead
of being set to a fake value, so the assert succeeds. This test was originally
posted by maflcko in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29261#issuecomment-1918947945
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <*~=`'#}+{/-|&$^_@721217.xyz>
The `PopulateAndValidateSnapshot` function introduced in
f6e2da5fb7 from #19806 has been setting fake
`nTx` and `nChainTx` values that can show up in RPC results (see #29328) and
make `CBlockIndex` state hard to reason about, because it is difficult to know
whether the values are real or fake.
Revert to previous behavior of setting `nTx` and `nChainTx` to 0 when the
values are unknown, instead of faking them.
This commit fixes at least two assert failures in the (pindex->nChainTx ==
pindex->nTx + prev_chain_tx) check that would happen previously. Tests for
these failures are added separately in the next two commits.
Compatibility note: This change could result in -checkblockindex failures if a
snapshot was loaded by a previous version of Bitcoin Core and not fully
validated, because fake nTx values will have been saved to the block index. It
would be pretty easy to avoid these failures by adding some compatibility code
to `LoadBlockIndex` and changing `nTx` values from 1 to 0 when they are fake
(when `(pindex->nStatus & BLOCK_VALID_MASK) < BLOCK_VALID_TRANSACTIONS`), but a
little simpler not to worry about being compatible in this case.
Add ubsan suppressions for integer overflows in the getchaintxstats RPC.
getchainstatstx line "int nTxDiff = pindex->nChainTx - past_block.nChainTx" can
trigger ubsan integer overflows when assumeutxo snapshots are loaded, from
subtracting unsigned values and assigning the result to a signed int.
The overflow behavior probably exists in current code but is hard to trigger
because it would require calling getchainstatstx at the right time with
specific parameters as background blocks are being downloaded. But the overflow
behavior becomes easier to trigger in the upcoming commit removing fake
nChainTx values, so a suppression needs to be added before then for CI to pass.
getchainstatstx should probably be improved separately in another PR to not
need this suppression, and handle edge cases and missing nChainTx values more
carefully.
5555395c15 lint: Use git --no-pager to print any output in one go (MarcoFalke)
fa5729436c lint: Fix lint-whitespace issues (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The lint check has many issues:
* It uses `COMMIT_RANGE`, which is brittle code, apparently making it harder to run the CI locally, or self-hosted. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29274#discussion_r1457739319
* The result depends on `COMMIT_RANGE`, or the number of commits passed to the script, which can cause false negatives or false positives.
* It is based on the diff output, parsing it, and printing it again, which is brittle as well.
* The output does not include line number, making it harder to act on a lint error.
Fix all issues by removing the script and replacing it with a simple call to `git grep -I --line-number ...`.
ACKs for top commit:
TheCharlatan:
Re-ACK 5555395c15
Tree-SHA512: 71ea8b6382af064beb72fb17f21a0ae9e9238c97e7fa43c2ec353fd1dd73a7bbd696ba0f0a9f65d1eff7c86cbf6cc104a992cb5450a3d50f122955e835270065
bf264e0598 test: check_mempool_result negative feerate (kevkevin)
Pull request description:
Adds test coverage in `mempool_accept.py` to check if a negative `maxfeerate` is input into `check_mempool_result`
Asserts "Amount out of range" error message and `-3` error code
Motivated by this [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29434/files#r1491112250)
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK bf264e0598
brunoerg:
nice, utACK bf264e0598
davidgumberg:
Looks great, ACK bf264e0598
Tree-SHA512: 58931b774cc887c616f2fd91af3ee65cc5db55acd8e2875c76de448c80bd4e020b057c5f4f85556431377f0d0e7553771fb285d1ec20cf64f64ec92a47776b78
0831b54dfc test: simplify test_runner.py (tdb3)
Pull request description:
Implements the simplifications to test_runner.py proposed by sipa in PR #23995.
Remove the num_running variable as it can be implied by the length of the jobs list.
Remove the i variable as it can be implied by the length of the test_results list.
Instead of counting results to determine if finished, make the queue object itself
responsible (by looking at running jobs and jobs left).
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
re-ACK 0831b54
davidgumberg:
reACK 0831b54dfc
marcofleon:
re-ACK 0831b54dfc
Tree-SHA512: e5473e68d49cd779b29d97635329283ae7195412cb1e92461675715ca7eedb6519a1a93ba28d40ca6f015d270f7bcd3e77cef279d9cd655155ab7805b49638f1
1ec6684b08 test: Add test for loadtxoutset when headers are not synced (Fabian Jahr)
2bc1ecfaa9 test: Remove unnecessary sync_blocks in assumeutxo tests (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
It adds a test for the change to `loadtxoutset` made in #29345. Before that change the test doesn't fail right away but times out after 10 minutes.
Also removes a `sync_blocks` call that didn't seem to do anything valuable.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 1ec6684b08
pablomartin4btc:
tACK 1ec6684b08
BrandonOdiwuor:
ACK 1ec6684b08
theStack:
ACK 1ec6684b08
Tree-SHA512: 1337decdf91e4a4f7213fcf8ace1d705e5c1422e0ac3872a59b5be9c33e743850cb8f5f7474750a534952eefd5cfe43fe85a54efb9bc0e47515136a2903676e5
And thread the feerate value through ProcessNewPackage to
reject individual transactions that exceed the given
feerate. This allows subpackage processing, and is
compatible with future package RBF work.
567cec9a05 doc: add release notes and help text for unix sockets (Matthew Zipkin)
bfe5192891 test: cover UNIX sockets in feature_proxy.py (Matthew Zipkin)
c65c0d0163 init: allow UNIX socket path for -proxy and -onion (Matthew Zipkin)
c3bd43142e gui: accomodate unix socket Proxy in updateDefaultProxyNets() (Matthew Zipkin)
a88bf9dedd i2p: construct Session with Proxy instead of CService (Matthew Zipkin)
d9318a37ec net: split ConnectToSocket() from ConnectDirectly() for unix sockets (Matthew Zipkin)
ac2ecf3182 proxy: rename randomize_credentials to m_randomize_credentials (Matthew Zipkin)
a89c3f59dc netbase: extend Proxy class to wrap UNIX socket as well as TCP (Matthew Zipkin)
3a7d6548ef net: move CreateSock() calls from ConnectNode() to netbase methods (Matthew Zipkin)
74f568cb6f netbase: allow CreateSock() to create UNIX sockets if supported (Matthew Zipkin)
bae86c8d31 netbase: refactor CreateSock() to accept sa_family_t (Matthew Zipkin)
adb3a3e51d configure: test for unix domain sockets (Matthew Zipkin)
Pull request description:
Closes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27252
UNIX domain sockets are a mechanism for inter-process communication that are faster than local TCP ports (because there is no need for TCP overhead) and potentially more secure because access is managed by the filesystem instead of serving an open port on the system.
There has been work on [unix domain sockets before](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9979) but for now I just wanted to start on this single use-case which is enabling unix sockets from the client side, specifically connecting to a local Tor proxy (Tor can listen on unix sockets and even enforces strict curent-user-only access permission before binding) configured by `-onion=` or `-proxy=`
I copied the prefix `unix:` usage from Tor. With this patch built locally you can test with your own filesystem path (example):
`tor --SocksPort unix:/Users/matthewzipkin/torsocket/x`
`bitcoind -proxy=unix:/Users/matthewzipkin/torsocket/x`
Prep work for this feature includes:
- Moving where and how we create `sockaddr` and `Sock` to accommodate `AF_UNIX` without disturbing `CService`
- Expanding `Proxy` class to represent either a `CService` or a UNIX socket (by its file path)
Future work:
- Enable UNIX sockets for ZMQ (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27679)
- Enable UNIX sockets for I2P SAM proxy (some code is included in this PR but not tested or exposed to user options yet)
- Enable UNIX sockets on windows where supported
- Update Network Proxies dialog in GUI to support UNIX sockets
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-ACK 567cec9a05
tdb3:
re ACK for 567cec9a05.
achow101:
ACK 567cec9a05
vasild:
ACK 567cec9a05
Tree-SHA512: de81860e56d5de83217a18df4c35297732b4ad491e293a0153d2d02a0bde1d022700a1131279b187ef219651487537354b9d06d10fde56225500c7e257df92c1
Remove the num_running variable as it can be implied by the
length of the jobs list.
Remove the i variable as it can be implied by the length of the
test_results list.
Instead of counting results to determine if finished, make the
queue object itself responsible (by looking at running jobs and
jobs left).
Originally proposed by @sipa in PR #23995.
Co-authored-by: Pieter Wuille <pieter@wuille.net>
The nKey of the addrman is generated the first time the node is
started. Therefore, restarting a node or turning it off and on
again won't make a previously non-deterministic addrman
deterministic.
Co-authored-by: 0xb10c <b10c@b10c.me>
e710cefd57 rest: read raw block in rest_block and deserialize for json (Andrew Toth)
95ce0783a6 rpc: read raw block in getblock and deserialize for verbosity > 0 (Andrew Toth)
0865ab8712 test: check more details on zmq raw block response (Andrew Toth)
38265cc14e zmq: read raw block with ReadRawBlockFromDisk (Andrew Toth)
da338aada7 blockstorage: check nPos in ReadRawBlockFromDisk before seeking back (Andrew Toth)
Pull request description:
For the `getblock` endpoint with `verbosity=0`, the `rest_block` REST endpoint for `bin` and `hex`, and zmq `NotifyBlock` we don't have to deserialize the block since we're just sending the raw data. This PR uses `ReadRawBlockFromDisk` instead of `ReadBlockFromDisk` to serve these requests, and only deserializes for `verbosity > 0` and `json` REST requests. See benchmarks in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26684.
Benchmarked using ApacheBench. Requesting block 750,000 in binary 10k times on a single core (set `-rest=1` in config):
`ab -n 10000 -c 1 "http://127.0.0.1:8332/rest/block/0000000000000000000592a974b1b9f087cb77628bb4a097d5c2c11b3476a58e.bin"`
On master, mean time 15ms.
On this branch, mean time 1ms.
For RPC
```
echo '{"jsonrpc": "1.0", "id": "curltest", "method": "getblock", "params": ["0000000000000000000592a974b1b9f087cb77628bb4a097d5c2c11b3476a58e", 0]}' > /tmp/data.json
ab -p /tmp/data.json -n 1000 -c 1 -A user:password "http://127.0.0.1:8332/"
```
On master, mean time 32ms
On this branch, mean time 13ms
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK e710cefd57
Tree-SHA512: 4cea13c7b563b2139d041b1fdcfdb793c8cc688654ae08db07e7ee6b875c5e582b8185db3ae603abbfb06d2164724f29205774620b48c493726b991999af289e
0a533613fb docs: add release notes for #27114 (brunoerg)
e6b8f19de9 test: add coverage for whitelisting manual connections (brunoerg)
c985eb854c test: add option to speed up tx relay/mempool sync (brunoerg)
66bc6e2d17 Accept "in" and "out" flags to -whitelist to allow whitelisting manual connections (Luke Dashjr)
8e06be347c net_processing: Move extra service flag into InitializeNode (Luke Dashjr)
9133fd69a5 net: Move `NetPermissionFlags::Implicit` verification to `AddWhitelistPermissionFlags` (Luke Dashjr)
2863d7dddb net: store `-whitelist{force}relay` values in `CConnman` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
Revives #17167. It allows whitelisting manual connections. Fixes#9923
Since there are some PRs/issues around this topic, I'll list some motivations/comments for whitelisting outbound connections from them:
- Speed-up tx relay/mempool sync for testing purposes (my personal motivation for this) - In #26970, theStack pointed out that we whitelist peers to speed up tx relay for fast mempool synchronization, however, since it applies only for inbound connections and considering the topology `node0 <--- node1 <---- node2 <--- ... <-- nodeN`, if a tx is submitted from any node other than node0, the mempool synchronization can take quite long.
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29058#issuecomment-1865155764 - "Before enabling -v2transport by default (which I'd image may happen after https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24748) we could consider a way to force manual connections to be only-v1 or even only-v2 (disabling reconnect-with-v1). A possibility could be through a net permission flag, if https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27114 makes it in."
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17167#issuecomment-1168606032 - "This would allow us to use https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25355 when making outgoing connections to all nodes, except to whitelisted ones for which we would use our persistent I2P address."
- Force-relay/mempool permissions for a node you intentionally connected to.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 0a533613fb
sr-gi:
re-ACK [0a53361](0a533613fb)
pinheadmz:
ACK 0a533613fb
Tree-SHA512: 97a79bb854110da04540897d2619eda409d829016aafdf1825ab5515334b0b42ef82f33cd41587af235b3af6ddcec3f2905ca038b5ab22e4c8a03d34f27aebe1
1342a31f3a [functional test] sibling eviction (glozow)
5fbab37859 [unit test] sibling not returned from SingleV3Checks if 1p2c or 3gen (glozow)
170306728a [policy] sibling eviction for v3 transactions (glozow)
b5d15f764f [refactor] return pair from SingleV3Checks (glozow)
Pull request description:
When we receive a v3 transaction that would bust a mempool transaction's descendant limit, instead of rejecting the new tx, consider replacing the other descendant if it is much higher feerate (using existing RBF criteria to assess that it's more incentive compatible and to avoid DoS).
Delving post with more background and motivation: https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/sibling-eviction-for-v3-transactions/472
ACKs for top commit:
sdaftuar:
ACK 1342a31f3a
achow101:
ACK 1342a31f3a
instagibbs:
ACK 1342a31f3a
Tree-SHA512: dd957d49e51db78758f566c49bddc579b72478e371275c592d3d5ba097d20de47a6c81952045021b99d82a787f5b799baf16dd0ee0e6de90ba12e21e275352be
2cc8ca19f4 [test] Use deterministic addrman in addrman info tests (stratospher)
a897866109 [test] Restart a node with empty addrman (stratospher)
71c19915c0 [test] Use deterministic addrman in addpeeraddress test (stratospher)
7b868e6b67 Revert "test: avoid non-determinism in asmap-addrman test" (stratospher)
69e091f3e1 [init] Create deterministic addrman in tests using -test=addrman (stratospher)
be25ac3092 [init] Remove -addrmantest command line arg (stratospher)
802e6e128b [init] Add new command line arg for use only in functional tests (stratospher)
Pull request description:
An address is placed in a `[bucket,position]` in the addrman table (new table or tried table) using the `addpeeraddress` RPC. This `[bucket,position]` is calculated using `nKey`(and other metrics) for the addrman which is chosen randomly during every run.
Supposing there are 2 addresses to be placed in an addrman table. During every test run, a different `[bucket,position]` would be calculated for each address.These calculated `[bucket,position]` could even be the same for the 2 addresses in some test runs and result in collisions in the addrman. We wouldn't be able to predict when the collisions are going to happen because we can't predict the `nKey` value which is chosen at random. This can cause flaky tests.
Because of these non deterministic collisions, we are limited in what we can do to test addrman functionality. Currently in our tests don't add a second address to prevent these collisions from happening - we only keep 1 address in the new table and 1 address in the tried table. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26988#discussion_r1091145647, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23084, [#22831(comment)](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22831/files#r708302639).
This PR lets us create a deterministic addrman with fixed `nKey` so that we can know the `[bucket,position]` collisions beforehand, safely add more addresses in an addrman table and write more extensive tests.
ACKs for top commit:
amitiuttarwar:
ACK 2cc8ca19f4
achow101:
ACK 2cc8ca19f4
0xB10C:
ACK 2cc8ca19f4
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK 2cc8ca19f4
Tree-SHA512: 8acd9bdfe7de1eb44d22373bf13533d8ecf602df966fdd5b8b78afcd8cc35a286c95d2712f67a89473a0d68dded7d38f5599f6e4bf95a6589475444545bfb189
Adds a new boolean parameter `wait_for_disconnect` to the
`add_outbound_p2p_connection` method. If set, the node under
test is checked to disconnect immediately after receiving the
version message (same logic as for feeler connections).
ecc036c5d6 ci: add --v2transport to an existing CI job (Martin Zumsande)
3a25a575f0 test: ignore --v2transport for older versions instead of asserting (Martin Zumsande)
547aacff08 test: add -v1transport option and use it in test_runner (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
This suggests a strategy to run the functional tests with both v1 and v2 transport in the CI.
**Status Quo:**
There is both the global `--v2transport` option for the `test_runner.py` (not enabled by default), plus the possibility to specify `--v2transport` for particular tests, which is used for a handful of tests. Currently, when running `test_runner.py --v2transport`, these tests are run twice with the same `--v2transport` configuration, as has been noted in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29358#discussion_r1485626063, which is wasteful.
**Suggested Change:**
Fix this by adding a `--v1transport` option and using it in `test_runner.py`, so that irrespective of the global `--v2transport` flag, the tests that run twice use v1 in one run and v2 in the other.
Also add `--v2transport` to one CI task (`multiprocess, i686, DEBUG`).
This means, that for each CI task, the majority of functional tests will run once using the global `--v2transport` option if provided, while a few selected tests will always run two times, once with `v1` and once with `v2`.
**Rationale:**
A simpler alternative would have been to remove all test-specific `--v2transport` commands from `test_runner.py` and just enable `--v2transport` option for a few CI tasks. I didn't do that because it would have meant that v2 would never be running in the CI for some platforms, and also be run a lot less locally by users and devs (who would have to actively enable the `--v2transport` option).
ACKs for top commit:
tdb3:
ACK for ecc036c5d6.
achow101:
ACK ecc036c5d6
stratospher:
ACK ecc036c.
vasild:
ACK ecc036c5d6
Tree-SHA512: 375b2293d49991f2fbd8e1bb646c0034004a09cee36063bc32996b721323eb19a43d7b2f36b3f9a3fdca846d74f48d8f1387565c03ef5d34b3481d2a0fe1d328
a951dba3a9 wallet: default wallet migration, modify inconvenient backup filename (furszy)
Pull request description:
Fixes#29584
On default legacy wallets, the backup filename starts with an "-" due to the wallet name being empty. This is inconvenient for systems who treat what follows the initial "-" character as flags.
Note:
As the user can freely set the wallet name to anything, we could also guard the backup filename against other inconvenient characters in the future (we need to be careful here, because the wallet name could also be a path).
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK a951dba3a9
brunoerg:
utACK a951dba3a9
vasild:
ACK a951dba3a9
Tree-SHA512: 6347bb12cfb50526a4baad96e4f1df9d82b493f79f0a0f7e0a1c8335a86a1e8e147c7b7f95cec6ede6f4507506a7eaf7972bd35131a2d5ed4cbbf38d94f0a9ca
c5b5843d8f test: avoid requesting blocks beyond limited peer threshold (furszy)
2f6a05512f p2p: sync from limited peer, only request blocks below threshold (furszy)
73127722a2 refactor: Make FindNextBlocks friendlier (furszy)
Pull request description:
Even when the node believes it has IBD completed, need to avoid
requesting historical blocks from network-limited peers.
Otherwise, the limited peer will disconnect right away.
The simplest scenario could be a node that gets synced, drops
connections, and stays inactive for a while. Then, once it re-connects
(IBD stays completed), the node tries to fetch all the missing blocks
from any peer, getting disconnected by the limited ones.
Note:
Can verify the behavior by cherry-picking the test commit alone on
master. It will fail there.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK c5b5843d8f
vasild:
ACK c5b5843d8f
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK c5b5843d8f
pinheadmz:
ACK c5b5843d8f
Tree-SHA512: 9e550698bc6e63cc587b2b988a87d0ab555a8fa188c91c3f33287f8201d77c28b373331845356ad86f17bb21c15950b6466bc1cafd0ce8139d70364cb71c2ad2
a3badf75f6 tests: Provide more helpful assert_equal errors (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
In the functional tests, we often compare dicts with assert_equal, but the output makes it very hard to tell exactly which entry in the dicts don't match when there are a lot of entries and only minor differences. Change the output to make it clearer.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK a3badf75f6
vasild:
ACK a3badf75f6
brunoerg:
utACK a3badf75f6
josibake:
ACK a3badf75f6
BrandonOdiwuor:
Code Review ACK a3badf75f6
Tree-SHA512: 1d4b4a3b2e2e28ab09f10b41b04b52b37f64e0d8a54e2306f37de0c3eb3299a7ad4ba225b9efa67057a75e90d008a17385c810a32c9b212d240be280c2dcf2e5
