Bitcoin Core mirror and no, I don't give a fuck about Monero.
Find a file
Ava Chow 9efe546688
Some checks are pending
CI / test each commit (push) Waiting to run
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, no depends, sqlite only, gui (push) Waiting to run
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, fuzz (push) Waiting to run
CI / Windows native, VS 2022 (push) Waiting to run
CI / Windows native, fuzz, VS 2022 (push) Waiting to run
CI / Linux->Windows cross, no tests (push) Waiting to run
CI / Windows, test cross-built (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / ASan + LSan + UBSan + integer, no depends, USDT (push) Waiting to run
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#31835: validation: set BLOCK_FAILED_CHILD correctly
3c3548a70e validation: clarify final |= BLOCK_FAILED_VALID in InvalidateBlock (Matt Corallo)
aac5488909 validation: correctly update BlockStatus for invalid block descendants (stratospher)
9e29653b42 test: check BlockStatus when InvalidateBlock is used (stratospher)
c99667583d validation: fix traversal condition to mark BLOCK_FAILED_CHILD (stratospher)

Pull request description:

  This PR addresses 3 issues related to how `BLOCK_FAILED_CHILD` is set:
  1. In `InvalidateBlock()`
  - Previously, `BLOCK_FAILED_CHILD` was not being set when it should have been.
  - This was due to an incorrect traversal condition, which is fixed in this PR.

  2. In `SetBlockFailure()`
  - `BLOCK_FAILED_VALID` is now cleared before setting `BLOCK_FAILED_CHILD`.

  3. In `InvalidateBlock()`
  - if block is already marked as `BLOCK_FAILED_CHILD`, don't mark it as `BLOCK_FAILED_VALID` again.

  Also adds a unit test to check `BLOCK_FAILED_VALID` and `BLOCK_FAILED_CHILD` status in `InvalidateBlock()`.

  <details>
  <summary><h3>looking for feedback on an alternate approach</h3></summary>
  <br>

  An alternate approach could be removing `BLOCK_FAILED_CHILD` since even though we have a distinction between
  `BLOCK_FAILED_VALID` and `BLOCK_FAILED_CHILD` in the codebase, we don't use it for anything. Whenever we check for BlockStatus, we use `BLOCK_FAILED_MASK` which encompasses both of them. See  similar discussion in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16856.

  I have a branch with this approach in https://github.com/stratospher/bitcoin/commits/2025_02_remove_block_failed_child/.
  Compared to the version in #16856, it also resets `BLOCK_FAILED_CHILD` already on disk to `BLOCK_FAILED_VALID` when loading from disk so that we won't be in a dirty state in a no-`BLOCK_FAILED_CHILD`-world.

  I'm not sure if it's a good idea to remove `BLOCK_FAILED_CHILD` though. would be curious to hear what others think of this approach.

  thanks @ mzumsande for helpful discussion regarding this PR!
  </details>

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    ACK 3c3548a70e
  TheCharlatan:
    Re-ACK 3c3548a70e
  mzumsande:
    re-ACK 3c3548a70e

Tree-SHA512: 83e0d29dea95b97519d4868135c965b86f6f43be50b15c0bd8f998b3476388fc7cc22b49c0c54ec532ae8222e57dfc436438f0c8e98f54757b384f220488b6a6
2025-04-23 14:09:56 -07:00
.github ci: re-enable all benchmark runs 2025-04-22 12:49:53 +02:00
.tx Update Transifex slug for 29.x 2025-02-06 09:38:49 +00:00
ci Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#32226: ci: switch to LLVM 20 in tidy job 2025-04-23 13:35:43 +01:00
cmake cmake: Fix clang-tidy "no input files" errors 2025-04-02 08:41:16 -05:00
contrib Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#31282: refactor: Make node_id a const& in RemoveBlockRequest 2025-04-14 14:22:56 -07:00
depends depends: remove non-native libmultiprocess build 2025-04-02 13:41:16 +00:00
doc Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#32113: fuzz: enable running fuzz test cases in Debug mode 2025-04-22 22:00:59 -04:00
share build: Remove bitness suffix from Windows installer 2025-03-24 14:19:11 +00:00
src Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#31835: validation: set BLOCK_FAILED_CHILD correctly 2025-04-23 14:09:56 -07:00
test Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#31953: rpc: Allow fullrbf fee bump in (psbt)bumpfee 2025-04-21 13:25:52 -07:00
.cirrus.yml ci: Move "Windows cross" job from Cirrus CI to GHA CI 2025-03-18 10:28:44 +00:00
.editorconfig code style: update .editorconfig file 2024-09-13 17:55:10 +02:00
.gitattributes Separate protocol versioning from clientversion 2014-10-29 00:24:40 -04:00
.gitignore gitignore: target/ 2025-02-18 20:46:30 +01:00
.python-version Bump python minimum supported version to 3.10 2024-08-28 15:53:07 +02:00
.style.yapf Update .style.yapf 2023-06-01 23:35:10 +05:30
CMakeLists.txt doc: Document WITH_EXTERNAL_LIBMULTIPROCESS build option better 2025-04-14 16:32:37 -04:00
CMakePresets.json scripted-diff: s/WITH_MULTIPROCESS/ENABLE_IPC/ in cmake 2025-04-02 08:41:16 -05:00
CONTRIBUTING.md doc: remove PR Review Club frequency 2024-11-20 11:16:39 +01:00
COPYING Squashed 'src/ipc/libmultiprocess/' content from commit 35944ffd23fa 2025-04-02 21:41:16 +08:00
INSTALL.md doc: Added hyperlink for doc/build 2021-09-09 19:53:12 +05:30
libbitcoinkernel.pc.in build: use CLIENT_NAME in libbitcoinkernel.pc.in 2025-02-07 16:11:48 +00:00
README.md Squashed 'src/ipc/libmultiprocess/' content from commit 35944ffd23fa 2025-04-02 21:41:16 +08:00
SECURITY.md Update security.md contact for achow101 2023-12-14 18:14:54 -05:00
vcpkg.json build, msvc: Build only required qtbase features 2025-04-03 10:26:58 +01:00

Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree

https://bitcoincore.org

For an immediately usable, binary version of the Bitcoin Core software, see https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/.

What is Bitcoin Core?

Bitcoin Core connects to the Bitcoin peer-to-peer network to download and fully validate blocks and transactions. It also includes a wallet and graphical user interface, which can be optionally built.

Further information about Bitcoin Core is available in the doc folder.

License

Bitcoin Core is released under the terms of the MIT license. See COPYING for more information or see https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT.

Development Process

The master branch is regularly built (see doc/build-*.md for instructions) and tested, but it is not guaranteed to be completely stable. Tags are created regularly from release branches to indicate new official, stable release versions of Bitcoin Core.

The https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui repository is used exclusively for the development of the GUI. Its master branch is identical in all monotree repositories. Release branches and tags do not exist, so please do not fork that repository unless it is for development reasons.

The contribution workflow is described in CONTRIBUTING.md and useful hints for developers can be found in doc/developer-notes.md.

Testing

Testing and code review is the bottleneck for development; we get more pull requests than we can review and test on short notice. Please be patient and help out by testing other people's pull requests, and remember this is a security-critical project where any mistake might cost people lots of money.

Automated Testing

Developers are strongly encouraged to write unit tests for new code, and to submit new unit tests for old code. Unit tests can be compiled and run (assuming they weren't disabled during the generation of the build system) with: ctest. Further details on running and extending unit tests can be found in /src/test/README.md.

There are also regression and integration tests, written in Python. These tests can be run (if the test dependencies are installed) with: build/test/functional/test_runner.py (assuming build is your build directory).

The CI (Continuous Integration) systems make sure that every pull request is built for Windows, Linux, and macOS, and that unit/sanity tests are run automatically.

Manual Quality Assurance (QA) Testing

Changes should be tested by somebody other than the developer who wrote the code. This is especially important for large or high-risk changes. It is useful to add a test plan to the pull request description if testing the changes is not straightforward.

Translations

Changes to translations as well as new translations can be submitted to Bitcoin Core's Transifex page.

Translations are periodically pulled from Transifex and merged into the git repository. See the translation process for details on how this works.

Important: We do not accept translation changes as GitHub pull requests because the next pull from Transifex would automatically overwrite them again.