fa40eb5b6b test: Speed up mempool_spend_coinbase.py (MarcoFalke)
fa29382ab2 test: Fix test cache issue (MarcoFalke)
fa085b470a test: Create MiniWallet.create_self_transfer (MarcoFalke)
fa1bedb494 test: Add MiniWallet.sendrawtransaction (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Locally the test will run 4 seconds faster with `--valgrind` (18s vs 14s)
ACKs for top commit:
mjdietzx:
crACK fa40eb5b6b
Tree-SHA512: ecfb60dda5ca5d7e6367bb9c6210390d95ebf6396ce657728901d118b75bb90c98f9351df3b01004d00682234448d6c6a13338d12097f7dced2cf7f1bd84d924
83a425d25a compressor: use a prevector in compressed script serialization (William Casarin)
Pull request description:
This function was doing millions of unnecessary heap allocations during IBD.
I'm start to catalog unnecessary heap allocations as a pet project of mine: as-zero-as-possible-alloc IBD. This is one small step.
before:
after:
~should I type alias this?~ *I type aliased it*
This is a part of the Zero Allocations Project #18849 (ZAP1). This code came up as a place where many allocations occur.
ACKs for top commit:
Empact:
ACK 83a425d25a
elichai:
tACK 83a425d25a
sipa:
utACK 83a425d25a
Tree-SHA512: f0ffa6ab0ea1632715b0b76362753f9f6935f05cdcc80d85566774401155a3c57ad45a687942a1806d3503858f0bb698da9243746c8e2edb8fdf13611235b0e0
545404e7e1 fuzz: Add RPC interface fuzzing. Increase fuzzing coverage from 65% to 70%. (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Add RPC interface fuzzing.
This PR increases overall fuzzing line coverage from [~65%](https://marcofalke.github.io/btc_cov/fuzz.coverage/) to ~70% 🎉
To test this PR:
```
$ make distclean
$ ./autogen.sh
$ CC=clang CXX=clang++ ./configure --enable-fuzz --with-sanitizers=address,fuzzer,undefined
$ make -C src/ test/fuzz/fuzz
$ FUZZ=rpc src/test/fuzz/fuzz
```
See [`doc/fuzzing.md`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/fuzzing.md) for more information on how to fuzz Bitcoin Core. Don't forget to contribute any coverage increasing inputs you find to the [Bitcoin Core fuzzing corpus repo](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets).
Happy fuzzing :)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
Concept ACK 545404e7e1
Tree-SHA512: 35fc1b508af42bf480ee3762326b09ff2eecdb7960a1917ad16345fadd5c0c21d666dafe736176e5a848ff6492483c782e4ea914cd9000faf50190df051950fd
844ad0ecca doc: IsSnapshotActive (James O'Beirne)
9b604c0207 validation: prepare VerifyDB for assumeutxo (James O'Beirne)
7901647d72 refactor: rename active_chainstate in VerifyDB (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the [assumeutxo project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11) (parent PR: #15606)
---
~~Pretty cut and dry; parameterizes `CVerifyDB` methods so that we can run the verify procedure on multiple chainstates.~~
Two minor tweaks to ensure that `VerifyDB` can be run on multiple chainstates and a corresponding rename.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Code review re-ACK 844ad0ecca
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 844ad0ecca🐥
Tree-SHA512: 26a398cf4dabc1aa0850743921dba0452b4813848a3c777586dc981716737e98e17b8110254a5c41af95dd236e0c00dc8b4eee891d69bef825a5e1911fc499d0
84934bf70e multiprocess: Add echoipc RPC method and test (Russell Yanofsky)
7d76cf667e multiprocess: Add comments and documentation (Russell Yanofsky)
ddf7ecc8df multiprocess: Add bitcoin-node process spawning support (Russell Yanofsky)
10afdf0280 multiprocess: Add Ipc interface implementation (Russell Yanofsky)
745c9cebd5 multiprocess: Add Ipc and Init interface definitions (Russell Yanofsky)
5d62d7f6cd Update libmultiprocess library (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10).
---
This PR adds basic process spawning and IPC method call support to `bitcoin-node` executables built with `--enable-multiprocess`[*].
These changes are used in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10102 to let node, gui, and wallet functionality run in different processes, and extended in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19460 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19461 after that to allow gui and wallet processes to be started and stopped independently and connect to the node over a socket.
These changes can also be used to implement new functionality outside the `bitcoin-node` process like external indexes or pluggable transports (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18988). The `Ipc::spawnProcess` and `Ipc::serveProcess` methods added here are entry points for spawning a child process and serving a parent process, and being able to make bidirectional, multithreaded method calls between the processes. A simple example of this is implemented in commit "Add echoipc RPC method and test."
Changes in this PR aside from the echo test were originally part of #10102, but have been split and moved here for easier review, and so they can be used for other applications like external plugins.
Additional notes about this PR can be found at https://bitcoincore.reviews/19160
[*] Note: the `--enable-multiprocess` feature is still experimental, and not enabled by default, and not yet supported on windows. More information can be found in [doc/multiprocess.md](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/multiprocess.md)
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
re-ACK 84934bf70e
ariard:
ACK 84934bf. Changes since last ACK fixes the silent merge conflict about `EnsureAnyNodeContext()`. Rebuilt and checked again debug command `echoipc`.
Tree-SHA512: 52a948b5e18a26d7d7a09b83003eaae9b1ed2981978c36c959fe9a55abf70ae6a627c4ff913a3428be17400a3dace30c58b5057fa75c319662c3be98f19810c6
d831e711ca [validation] RewindBlockIndex no longer needed (Dhruv Mehta)
Pull request description:
Closes#17862
Context from [original comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/17862#issuecomment-744285188) (minor edits):
`RewindBlockIndex()` is a mechanism to allow nodes to be upgraded after segwit activation, while still keeping their chainstate/datadir in a consistent state. It works as follows:
- A pre-segwit (i.e. v0.13.0 or older) node is running.
- Segwit activates. The pre-segwit node remains sync'ed to the tip, but is not enforcing the new segwit rules.
- The user upgrades the node to a segwit-aware version (v0.13.1 or newer).
- On startup, in `AppInitMain()`, `RewindBlockIndex()` is called. This walks the chain backwards from the tip, disconnecting and erasing blocks that from after segwit activation that weren't validated with segwit rules.
- those blocks are then redownloaded (with witness data) and validated with segwit rules.
This logic probably isn't required any more since:
- Segwit activated at height 481824, when the block chain was 130GB and the total number of txs was 250 million. Today, we're at height 667704, the blockchain is over 315GB and the total number of txs is over 600 million. Even if 20% of that added data is witness data (a high estimate), then around 150GB of transactions would need to be rewound to get back to segwit activation height. It'd probably be faster to simply validate from genesis, especially since we won't be validating any scripts before the assumevalid block. It's also unclear whether rewinding 150GB of transactions would even work. It's certainly never been tested.
- Bitcoin Core v0.13 is hardly used any more. https://luke.dashjr.org/programs/bitcoin/files/charts/software.html shows less than 50 nodes running it. The software was EOL on Aug 1st 2018. It's very unlikely that anyone is running 0.13 and will want to upgrade to 0.22.
This PR introduces `NeedsRedownload()` which merely checks for insufficiently validated segwit blocks and requests that the user restarts the node with `-reindex`. Reindexing the block files upon restart will make the node rebuild chain state and block index from the `blk*.dat` files on disk. The node won't be able to index the blocks with `BLOCK_OPT_WITNESS`, so they will be missing from the chain and be re-downloaded, with witness data.
Removing this code allows the following (done in follow-up #21090):
- removal of tests using `segwitheight=-1` in `p2p_segwit.py`.
- in turn, that allows us to drop support for `-segwitheight=-1`, which is only supported for that test.
- that allows us to always set `NODE_WITNESS` in our local services. The only reason we don't do that is to support `-segwitheight=-1`.
- that in turn allows us to drop all of the `GetLocalServices() & NODE_WITNESS` checks inside `net_processing.cpp`, since our local services would always include `NODE_WITNESS`
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK d831e711ca
jamesob:
ACK d831e711ca
laanwj:
Cursory code review ACK d831e711ca. Agree with the direction of the change, thanks for simplifying the logic here.
glozow:
utACK d831e711ca
Tree-SHA512: 3eddf5121ccd081ad7f15a5c6478ef867083edc8ba0bf1ee759e87bc070ee3d2f0698a3feba8db8dc087987c8452887b6f72cff05b3e178f41cb10a515fb8053
785f9cc46a refactor: init: mark fReset const (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
Small thing, but hey - it doesn't change.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
Code-review ACK 785f9cc46a
Tree-SHA512: 3cb8d7037f517162f6315d561accc4932b0f1e340162c3283871433f2e355d57b3740c9d2e953ce33fbfa3b277c8437f91955fb70331b3fe9c8e6a8589dc2b49
a732ee353c [test] Add tests for addr relay in -blocksonly mode (Amiti Uttarwar)
a6694eaed8 [test] Add address relay tests involving outbound peers (Martin Zumsande)
8188b77c17 [test] Add tests for getaddr behavior (Martin Zumsande)
d2dbfe6ff1 [test] Extract sending an addr message into a helper (Amiti Uttarwar)
c991943399 [test] Refactor the addr relay test to prepare for new tests (Amiti Uttarwar)
Pull request description:
This extends the functional test `p2p_addr_relay.py`.
It adds test coverage for address relay involving outbound peers, tests for both outgoing and incoming `GETADDR` requests and tests for `-blocksonly` mode.
The initial refactors and some of the new tests were taken from Amiti Uttarwar's PR #21528 - they are general test improvements not directly tied to the change proposed there.
ACKs for top commit:
amitiuttarwar:
re-ACK a732ee353c, small diff based on code review
MarcoFalke:
Concept ACK a732ee353c🌊
Tree-SHA512: e80d52683808ddd6b948a5134239f002f3fecf61b60e187877b07be6251721fde847104e495c75a1a5133a09c0b41a9255a0bec82932c0b304b516fa89bce33e
5f438d66c1 refactor, qt: Simplify SendCoinsDialog::updateCoinControlState (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
This PR doesn't change behaviour, removes the coin control argument from `updateCoinControlState` since it's a class member.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 5f438d66c1, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
jonatack:
Code review ACK 5f438d66c1
kristapsk:
utACK 5f438d66c1. Code looks correct.
Tree-SHA512: 14abaa3d561f8c8854fed989b6aca886dcca42135880bac76070043f61c0042ec8967f2b83e50bbbb82050ef0f074209e97fa300cb4dc51ee182316e0846506d
8c8237a4a1 net, refactor: Fix style in CConnman::StopNodes (Hennadii Stepanov)
229ac1892d net: Combine two loops into one, and update comments (Hennadii Stepanov)
a3d090d110 net: Restrict period when cs_vNodes mutex is locked (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR restricts the period when the `cs_vNodes` mutex is locked, prevents the only case when `cs_vNodes` could be locked before the `::cs_main`.
This change makes the explicit locking of recursive mutexes in the explicit order redundant.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK 8c8237a4a1
vasild:
ACK 8c8237a4a1
ajtowns:
utACK 8c8237a4a1 - logic seems sound
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 8c8237a4a1👢
Tree-SHA512: a8277924339622b188b12d260a100adf5d82781634cf974320cf6007341f946a7ff40351137c2f5369aed0d318f38aac2d32965c9b619432440d722a4e78bb73
Add simple interfaces::Echo IPC interface with one method that just takes and
returns a string, to test multiprocess framework and provide an example of how
it can be used to spawn and call between processes.
615965cfd1 Move common package version code to init/common (Russell Yanofsky)
5bed2ab42c Move common logging start code to init/common (Russell Yanofsky)
1fb7fcfa52 Move common logging GetArgs code to init/common (Russell Yanofsky)
90469c1690 Move common logging AddArg code to init/common (Russell Yanofsky)
387c4cf588 Move common sanity check code to init/common (Russell Yanofsky)
a67b54855b Move common global init code to init/common (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10).
---
This change is move-only and can be easily reviewed with `--color-moved=dimmed_zebra`. The moves are needed to avoid duplicating common init code between different binaries (`bitcoin-node`, `bitcoin-wallet`, etc) in #10102. In #10102, each binary has it's own init file (`src/init/bitcoin-node.cpp`, `src/init/bitcoin-wallet.cpp`) so this PR moves the common code to `src/init/common.cpp`.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 615965cfd1 🖱
practicalswift:
cr ACK 615965cfd1: dimmed zebra looks correct
Tree-SHA512: 859e1d86aee17eb50a49d806cf62d30d12f6b15018e41c096da41d7e535a9d2d088481cb340fee59e6c68e512a74b61c7146f2683465f553dc4953bf32f2a7b4
b01cd9471f test: check that _all_ invalid-CLTV txs are rejected after BIP65 activation (Sebastian Falbesoner)
dbc1981474 test: check that _all_ invalid-CLTV txs are allowed in a block pre-BIP65 (Sebastian Falbesoner)
8d0ce50c48 test: prepare cltv_invalidate to test all failure reasons in feature_cltv.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
ce994e1202 test: add tx modfication helper function in feature_cltv.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
The functional test for [BIP65](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0065.mediawiki) / `OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY` (`feature_cltv.py`) currently only tests one out of five conditions that lead to failure of the op-code -- by prepending the script `OP_1NEGATE OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY OP_DROP` to a tx's first input's scriptSig, the case of "_the top item on the stack is less than 0_" is checked:
f8462a6d27/test/functional/feature_cltv.py (L26-L35)
This PR adds the other cases (5 in total) by taking an integer argument to the function `cltv_invalidate` that is called in a loop instead of only once per testing scenario. Here is the full list of failure conditions and how they are tested (note that the scriptSig should still be valid before activation of BIP65, when `OP_CLTV` is simply a no-op):
* _the stack is empty_
➡️ prepending `OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY` to scriptSig
* _the top item on the stack is less than 0_
➡️ prepending `OP_1NEGATE OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY OP_DROP` to scriptSig
* _the lock-time type (height vs. timestamp) of the top stack item and the nLockTime field are not the same_
➡️ prepending `OPNum(1000) OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY OP_DROP` to scriptSig
➡️ setting tx.vin[0].nSequence=0 and tx.nCheckTimeLock=1296688602 (genesis block timestamp)
* _the top stack item is greater than the transaction's nLockTime field_
➡️ prepending `OPNum(1000) OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY OP_DROP` to scriptSig
➡️ setting tx.vin[0].nSequence=0 and tx.nCheckTimeLock=500
* _the nSequence field of the txin is 0xffffffff_
➡️ prepending `OPNum(500) OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY OP_DROP` to scriptSig
➡️ setting tx.vin[0].nSequence=0xffffffff and tx.nCheckTimeLock=500
The first commit creates a helper function for the tx modification and also includes some tidying up like turning single-line to multi-line Python imports where necessary and cleaning up some PEP8 warnings. The second commit prepares the invalidation function `cltv_invalidate` and the third and the fourth use it and check for the expected reject reason strings ("Operation not valid with the current stack size", "Negative locktime" and "Locktime requirement not satisfied").
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK b01cd9471f🐣
Tree-SHA512: dd82ae86e2bc4f3ab9bb1cfc9f04e4431b2b59c8aaf2a9f4b28654a1577e003fb43c500f99d76ff57e96262168e1cad7c1a0d71158e4b01063737e8f4be1e07d
417305991a qt: Bump transifex slug for 22.x (W. J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Opening the 22.x translations early because of experimentation with the new xliff translations format. So change the slug so that the `tx` tool will fetch the right translation.
In this context, change `file_filter` to use `xlf` as well as the files pulled with `tx pull` are that format now. The setting only affects the naming not the format of the files.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 417305991a, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged. All changes are in accordance with the Transifex [docs](https://docs.transifex.com/client/client-configuration).
Tree-SHA512: e0c18aa5e6cbd4428d24324fee8e5761b70dae51d0236277577aded719798c6a32fc81c0598f280321f2816629e33a334f61f9e7f6180c4074abfda6550cefbe
