44dab423eb qa: Test default include_mempool value of gettxout (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
With the following diff the functional test would pass. Fix by testing the default value.
```diff
--- a/src/rpc/blockchain.cpp
+++ b/src/rpc/blockchain.cpp
@@ -1142,7 +1142,7 @@ static RPCHelpMan gettxout()
uint256 hash(ParseHashV(request.params[0], "txid"));
int n = request.params[1].get_int();
COutPoint out(hash, n);
- bool fMempool = true;
+ bool fMempool = false;
if (!request.params[2].isNull())
fMempool = request.params[2].get_bool();
```
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 44dab423eb
Tree-SHA512: 14db21b29d6b2c01d1d1278e18a0cf35d6ae566e33e45515d1fe2983dda94ad1ff6065c217601d283f9515cae39b57e981b62ac71ec2002de5359bd8a9e3efa9
5f2be6e71e Remove no longer used contrib/bitcoin-qt.pro from the repo (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
From [IRC](http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2021-04-15.html#l-209):
> \<hebasto> wumpus: I cannot see any way how the `contrib/bitcoin-qt.pro` is used in the translation process, neither in the main repo nor in https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-maintainer-tools. Besides it looks outdated and unmaintained. May I ask you to confirm/deny my assumption?
> \<wumpus> hebasto: it is not used for anything, it exists to be able to edit the qt forms in qt designer nothing more
> \<wumpus> i'm not sure if it is even *necessary* for that, but it is why it is there
> \<hebasto> wumpus: thanks, qt designer does not need *.pro file at all
> \<hebasto> maybe qt creator does
> \<wumpus> feel free to create a PR to remove it, best way to find out if someone wants to keep it, you are right it hasn't been updated in a long time
> \<hebasto> ok
> \<wumpus> fwiw, the only question i get about it ever is why it exists
> \<hebasto> it was in use with `qmake` years ago (what I found digging into the repo history)
> \<wumpus> yes, that was the original reason, but when we switched to automake it was kept around for use w/ qt's GUI tools
> \<hebasto> I've noticed it in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blame/master/doc/translation_process.md#L25
> \<wumpus> what it says there is definitely not true anymore
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 5f2be6e71e
jarolrod:
ACK 5f2be6e71e
Tree-SHA512: 7c105612f28185097fee9e4108b162b4c8b07cc527f4438bdf5bcab08c65421ea301de8584d58770cd113fa871f6781daa8145bd6463278523449e28bfc49d06
549c82ad3a fuzz: use ConsumeBool() instead of !ConsumeBool() (Vasil Dimov)
29ae1c13a5 fuzz: split FuzzedSock interface and implementation (Vasil Dimov)
9668e43d8e fuzz: make FuzzedSock::Wait() sometimes simulate an occurred event (Vasil Dimov)
0c90ff1429 fuzz: set errno from FuzzedSock::Wait() if it simulates a failure (Vasil Dimov)
5198a02de4 style: remove extra white space (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
* split FuzzedSock interface and implementation
* make FuzzedSock::Wait() sometimes simulate an occurred event
* set errno from FuzzedSock::Wait() if it simulates a failure
(this is a followup from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21617)
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK 549c82ad3a: patch looks correct and touches only `src/test/fuzz/`
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 549c82ad3a only change is rebase 🎬
Tree-SHA512: 8ba965a8319074ad2ef840219c35c77e37cc79f00fb3926f20ccbf5f58e9616f5a3ac96434ad33996b47d292fa760d5d00a529001ac0d1d254262e5df93f616f
fa40d6a1c4 test: Reset mocktime in the common setup (MarcoFalke)
fa78590a8f test: Use mocktime to avoid intermittent failure (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21602#discussion_r611176103
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Code review ACK fa40d6a1c4
jarolrod:
ACK fa40d6a1c4
Tree-SHA512: 4967e006f3d2c4eb92f03c9086a6abe3190ad54755d251c30d20422c574bb1a154c06f3d5bcb0d4deaa3c4abfd3864d743b71d84897edd358e829bb42233ad12
Move the `FuzzedSock`'s implementation from `src/test/fuzz/util.h` to
`src/test/fuzz/util.cpp`.
A separate interface and implementation make the code more readable for
consumers who don't need to (better not) know the implementation
details.
6262182b3f Avoid use of low file descriptor ids (which may be in use) in FuzzedSock and StaticContentsSock (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Avoid use of low file descriptor ids (which may be in use) in `FuzzedSock`.
Context: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21630/files#r610694541
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
ACK 6262182b3f
Tree-SHA512: e622acb4d01446c3db01adbbbb779038be7247e13f3f4e72c614bc2880c3efd710fd3b189f87abb00f236fa5ddf91f4c215f420ca4eb08a97aaba31593254c3d
ffe33dfbd4 chainparams: drop versionbits threshold to 90% for mainnnet and signet (Anthony Towns)
f054f6bcd2 versionbits: simplify state transitions (Anthony Towns)
55ac5f568a versionbits: Add explicit NEVER_ACTIVE deployments (Anthony Towns)
dd07e6da48 fuzz: test versionbits delayed activation (Anthony Towns)
dd85d5411c tests: test versionbits delayed activation (Anthony Towns)
73d4a70639 versionbits: Add support for delayed activation (Anthony Towns)
9e6b65f6fa tests: clean up versionbits test (Anthony Towns)
5932744450 tests: test ComputeBlockVersion for all deployments (Anthony Towns)
63879f0a47 tests: pull ComputeBlockVersion test into its own function (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
BIP9-based implementation of "speedy trial" activation specification, see https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2021-March/018583.html
Edge cases are tested by fuzzing added in #21380.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
tACK ffe33dfbd4
jnewbery:
utACK ffe33dfbd4
MarcoFalke:
review ACK ffe33dfbd4💈
achow101:
re-ACK ffe33dfbd4
gmaxwell:
ACK ffe33dfbd4
benthecarman:
ACK ffe33dfbd4
Sjors:
ACK ffe33dfbd4
jonatack:
Initial approach ACK ffe33dfbd4 after a first pass of review, building and testing each commit, mostly looking at the changes and diffs. Will do a more high-level review iteration. A few minor comments follow to pick/choose/ignore.
ariard:
Code Review ACK ffe33df
Tree-SHA512: f79a7146b2450057ee92155cbbbcec12cd64334236d9239c6bd7d31b32eec145a9781c320f178da7b44ababdb8808b84d9d22a40e0851e229ba6d224e3be747c
09b3e46848 doc: remove boostrap info from GUIX_COMMON_FLAGS doc (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Passing `ADDITIONAL_GUIX_COMMON_FLAGS="--no-substitutes --bootstrap"` as suggested doesn't work:
```bash
...outputting in: '/bitcoin/guix-build-a1f0b8b62eb8/output/x86_64-linux-gnu'
...bind-mounted in container to: '/outdir-base/x86_64-linux-gnu'
guix time-machine: error: bootstrap: unrecognized option
```
and I think bootstrapping is more than covered in the preceding "Choose your security model" section.
ACKs for top commit:
dongcarl:
ACK 09b3e46848
jarolrod:
ACK 09b3e46848
laanwj:
Documentation review ACK 09b3e46848
Tree-SHA512: e533a0b925a2ec091884ec04313f56376b4e85f615c8853dd51840181493d61bd01fee1c019e34880c32d7896e4871ea77e63398ba02b022f614c03bb16531aa
11115c8ee5 ci: Only cache depends/sdk-sources for macos/apk task in cirrus (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Only macos needs the sdk-sources, so move it there (and remove it from showing up in the other tasks)
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 11115c8ee5
Tree-SHA512: 9e80e74016052e7b00314e191acc84c5e400bbf2e0d93ee7b1494b6be99e671cc326ddaa1fbded82f0912a9e338ad1891019dce78199b08c5180af42cb59729a
fa73ce6e65 Fix assumeutxo crash due to truncated file (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
ACKs for top commit:
jamesob:
ACK fa73ce6e65
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa73ce6e65. Easy fix. It seems like this could have been caught in review, though.
Tree-SHA512: 3a98687c386e3995114ddf0ad7194fadd9520989290681ef703b578e3ca21aee51eadfb83aa38a489bac13d12709ea137b9b184b08e5bfa2919cca177aab90be
b8e5d0d3fe qt: Handle exceptions in SendCoinsDialog::sendButtonClicked slot (Hennadii Stepanov)
1ac2bc7ac0 qt: Handle exceptions in TransactionView::bumpFee slot (Hennadii Stepanov)
bc00e13bc8 qt: Handle exceptions in WalletModel::pollBalanceChanged slot (Hennadii Stepanov)
eb6156ba1b qt: Handle exceptions in BitcoinGUI::addWallet slot (Hennadii Stepanov)
f7e260a471 qt: Add GUIUtil::ExceptionSafeConnect function (Hennadii Stepanov)
64a8755af3 qt: Add BitcoinApplication::handleNonFatalException function (Hennadii Stepanov)
af7e365b15 qt: Make PACKAGE_BUGREPORT link clickable (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR is an alternative to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18897, and is based on Russ' [idea](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18897#pullrequestreview-418703664):
> IMO it would be nice to have a followup PR that eliminated the one-line forwarding methods ...
Related issues
- #91
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18643
Qt docs: https://doc.qt.io/qt-5.12/exceptionsafety.html#exceptions-in-client-code
With this PR the GUI handles the wallet-related exception, and:
- display it to a user:
- prints a message to `stderr`:
```
************************
EXCEPTION: 18NonFatalCheckError
wallet/wallet.cpp:2677 (IsCurrentForAntiFeeSniping)
Internal bug detected: '!chain.findBlock(block_hash, FoundBlock().time(block_time))'
You may report this issue here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues
bitcoin in QPushButton->SendCoinsDialog
```
- writes a message to the `debug.log`
- and, if the exception is a non-fatal error, leaves the main window running.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK b8e5d0d3fe
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK b8e5d0d3fe. This is great! I think more improvements are possible but implementation is very clean and I love how targeted each commit is. Changes since last review: adding more explanatory text, making links clickable, reorganizing.
Tree-SHA512: a9f2a2ee8e64b993b0dbc454edcbc39c68c8852abb5dc1feb58f601c0e0e8014dca81c72733aa3fb07b619c6f49b823ed20c7d79cc92088a3abe040ed2149727
fadea0bf37 Revert "test: Add tsan supp for leveldb::DBImpl::DeleteObsoleteFiles" (MarcoFalke)
fadbd99885 test: Remove spurious double lock tsan suppressions by bumping to clang-12 (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The double lock warnings appeared in #19041, but they didn't make any sense. Also, our sync module would detect double locks, if there were any.
Bumping to clang-12 allows us to remove the spurious suppressions needed to run the tests, so do that.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK fadea0bf37 assuming CI passes and more specifically that newer Clang agrees that these TSan suppressions are no longer needed.
Tree-SHA512: c411221a4b74d0af6ca8d686639b4f40b41c15906ccbb6647e8d569d6ab088264faafe075e1ac9523d5c0024b85f15a597bb3eedc7f07d4f5816245f75cfc08b
Passing ADDITIONAL_GUIX_COMMON_FLAGS="--no-substitutes --bootstrap" as
suggested doesn't work:
```bash
...outputting in: '/bitcoin/guix-build-a1f0b8b62eb8/output/x86_64-linux-gnu'
...bind-mounted in container to: '/outdir-base/x86_64-linux-gnu'
guix time-machine: error: bootstrap: unrecognized option
```
and I think bootstrapping is more than covered in the preceding "Choose
your security model" section.
41f891da50 tests: Skip SQLite fsyncs while testing (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Since we want tests to run quickly, and since tests do a lot more db operations than expected we expect to see in actual usage, we disable sqlite's syncing behavior to make db operations run much faster. This syncing behavior is necessary for normal operation as it helps guarantee that data won't become lost or corrupted, but in tests, we don't care about that.
Fixes#21628
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
ACK 41f891da50
Tree-SHA512: f36f969a182c622691ae5113573a3250e8d367437e83a1a9d3d2b55dd3a9cdf3c6474169a7bd271007bb9ce47f585aa7a6aeae6eebbaeb02d79409b02f47fd8b
fadcd3f78e doc: Remove irrelevant link to GitHub (MarcoFalke)
fa121b628d blockstorage: [refactor] Use chainman reference where possible (MarcoFalke)
fa0c7d9ad2 move-only: Move *Disk functions to blockstorage (MarcoFalke)
fa91b2b2b3 move-only: Move AbortNode to shutdown (MarcoFalke)
fa413f07a1 move-only: Move ThreadImport to blockstorage (MarcoFalke)
faf843c07f refactor: Move load block thread into ChainstateManager (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This picks up the closed pull request #21030 and is the first step toward fixing #21220.
The basic idea is to move all disk access into a separate module with benefits:
* Breaking down the massive files init.cpp and validation.cpp into logical units
* Creating a standalone-module to reduce the mental complexity
* Pave the way to fix validation related circular dependencies
* Pave the way to mock disk access for testing, especially where it is performance critical (like fuzzing)
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK fadcd3f78e, checked (almost) moved only changes. This is a nice tidy up change and doesn't change behavior. Easily reviewed commit by commit.
jamesob:
ACK fadcd3f78e ([`jamesob/ackr/21575.1.MarcoFalke.refactor_create_blocksto`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/21575.1.MarcoFalke.refactor_create_blocksto))
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fadcd3f78e. New organization makes sense, moves extraneous things outside of validation.cpp. PR is also easy to review with helpfully split up moveonly commits.
Tree-SHA512: 917996592b6d8f9998289d8cb2b1b78b23d1fdb3b07216c9caec1380df33baa09dc2c1e706da669d440b497e79c9c62a01ca20dc202df5ad974a75f3ef7a143b
003929c0d5 refactor: add [[noreturn]] attribute where applicable (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Similar to #10843. We could build with `-Wmissing-noreturn`, however that would also mean modifying something like `--suppress-external-warnings` to suppress warnings for leveldb, which I don't think we want to do. In any case, the functions where this is applicable are only added/removed very rarely.
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
ACK 003929c0d5
Tree-SHA512: 33dfa6547d6b84f38a941f24d4c2effe8fde7b93dbc0b27a9309716420e4a879fdbe689d789fa5439d65f5f78292f89fd9dc1b61c97acf69316dfed954086705
223b1ba7d9 doc: Use CONFIG_SITE instead of --prefix (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
The current examples of `--prefix=...` option usage to point `configure` script to appropriate `depends` directory is not [standard](https://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Directory-Variables.html). This causes some [confusion](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16691) and a bit of inconvenience.
Consider a CentOS 7 32 bit system. Packages `libdb4-devel`, `libdb4-cxx-devel`, `miniupnpc-devel` and `zeromq-devel` are unavailable from repos. After recommended build with depends:
```
cd depends
make
cd ..
./autogen.sh
./configure --prefix=$PWD/depends/i686-pc-linux-gnu
make
```
a user is unable to `make install` compiled binaries neither locally (to `~/.local`) nor system-wide (to `/usr/local`) as `--prefix` is set already.
Meanwhile, the standard approach with using [`config.site`](https://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/config_002esite.html) files allows both possibilities:
```
cd depends
make
cd ..
./autogen.sh
CONFIG_SITE=$PWD/depends/i686-pc-linux-gnu/share/config.site ./configure --prefix ~/.local
make
make install
```
or
```
CONFIG_SITE=$PWD/depends/i686-pc-linux-gnu/share/config.site ./configure
make
sudo make install # install to /usr/local
```
Moreover, this approach is used in [Gitian descriptors](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/tree/master/contrib/gitian-descriptors) already.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 223b1ba7d9: patch looks correct
fanquake:
ACK 223b1ba7d9
Tree-SHA512: 46d97924f0fc7e95ee4566737cf7c2ae805ca500e5c49af9aa99ecc3acede4b00329bc727a110aa1b62618dfbf5d1ca2234e736f16fbdf96d6ece5f821712f54
Rather than 3 different messages that are confusing / leak
implementation details, use a single message, that is similar to other
wallet related messages. i.e:
"Compiled without sqlite support (required for descriptor wallets)".
88d4d5ff2f rpc: add help for enumeratesigners and walletdisplayaddress (Sjors Provoost)
b0db187e5b ci: use --enable-external-signer instead of --with-boost-process (Sjors Provoost)
b54b2e7b1a Move external signer out of wallet module (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
In addition, this PR enables external signer testing on CI.
This PR moves the ExternalSigner class and RPC methods out of the wallet module.
The `enumeratesigners` RPC can be used without a wallet since #21417. With additional modifications external signers could be used without a wallet in general, e.g. via `signrawtransaction`.
The `signerdisplayaddress` RPC is ranamed to `walletdisplayaddress` because it requires wallet context. A future `displayaddress` RPC call without wallet context could take a descriptor argument.
This commit fixes a `rpc_help.py` failure when configured with `--disable-wallet`.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 88d4d5ff2f
fanquake:
ACK 88d4d5ff2f
Tree-SHA512: 3242a24e22313aed97eee32a520bfcb1c17495ba32a2b8e06a5e151e2611320e2da5ef35b572d84623af0a49a210d2f9377a2531250868d1a0ccf3e144352a97
1c1467f51b i2p: cancel the Accept() method if waiting on the socket errors (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
If `Sock::Wait()` fails, then cancel the `Accept()` method.
Not checking the return value may cause an uninitialized read a few lines below when we read the `occurred` variable.
[Spotted](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21630#issuecomment-814765659) by MarcoFalke, thanks!
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 1c1467f51b
practicalswift:
cr ACK 1c1467f51b: patch looks correct and agree with laanwj that `[[nodiscard]]` can be taken in a follow-up PR :)
Tree-SHA512: 57fa8a03a4e055999e23121cd9ed1566a585ece0cf68b74223d8c902804cb6890218c9356d60e0560ccacc6c8542a526356c226ebd48e7b299b4572be312d49b
725d7ae049 Use PrecomputedTransactionData in signet check (Pieter Wuille)
497718b467 Treat amount<0 also as missing data for P2WPKH/P2WSH (Pieter Wuille)
3820090bd6 Make all SignatureChecker explicit about missing data (Pieter Wuille)
b77b0cc507 Add MissingDataBehavior and make TransactionSignatureChecker handle it (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Currently we have 2 levels of potentially-missing data in the transaction signature hashes:
* P2WPKH/P2WSH hashes need the spent amount
* P2TR hashes need all spent outputs (amount + scriptPubKey)
Missing amounts are treated as -1 (thus leading to unexpected signature failures), while missing outputs in P2TR validation cause assertion failure. This is hard to extend for signing support, and also quite ugly in general.
In this PR, an explicit configuration option to {Mutable,}TransactionSignatureChecker is added (MissingDataBehavior enum class) to either select ASSERT_FAIL or FAIL. Validation code passes ASSERT_FAIL (as at validation time all data should always be passed, and anything else is a serious bug in the code), while signing code uses FAIL.
The existence of the ASSERT_FAIL option is really just an abundance of caution. Always using FAIL should be just fine, but if there were for some reason a code path in consensus code was introduced that misses certain data, I think we prefer as assertion failure over silently introducing a consensus change.
Potentially useful follow-ups (not for this PR, in my preference):
* Having an explicit script validation error code for missing data.
* Having a MissingDataBehavior::SUCCEED option as well, for use in script/sign.cpp DataFromTransaction (if a signature is present in a witness, and we don't have enough data to fully validate it, we should probably treat it as valid and not touch it).
ACKs for top commit:
sanket1729:
reACK 725d7ae049
Sjors:
ACK 725d7ae049
achow101:
re-ACK 725d7ae049
benthecarman:
ACK 725d7ae049
fjahr:
Code review ACK 725d7ae049
Tree-SHA512: d67dc51bae9ca7ef6eb9acccefd682529f397830f77d74cd305500a081ef55aede0e9fa380648c3a8dd4857aa7eeb1ab54fe808979d79db0784ac94ceb31b657
Since we want tests to run quickly, and since tests do a lot more db
operations than expected we expect to see in actual usage, we disable
sqlite's syncing behavior to make db operations run much faster. This
syncing behavior is necessary for normal operation as it helps guarantee
that data won't become lost or corrupted, but in tests, we don't care
about that.
