4e1154dfd1 qt: Use "fusion" style on macOS Big Sur with old Qt (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
The "macintosh" style is broken on macOS Big Sur:
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/20555#issuecomment-756264648
- #136
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 4e1154dfd1 can't test
jarolrod:
ACK 4e1154dfd1
jonasschnelli:
Tested ACK 4e1154dfd1
Tree-SHA512: c2e0f7be220c8b34b182c73e362f41d0e8c8c002e766fcb5491c62f3cfb9f70eabbd32b29baefa152135efc5f83b15534c1c2459e500a586b0f64c5aa8acf614
647b81b709 wallet, rpc: add listdescriptors command (Ivan Metlushko)
Pull request description:
Looking for concept ACKs
**Rationale**: allow users to inspect the contents of their newly created descriptor wallets.
Currently the command only returns xpubs which is not very useful in itself, but there are multiples ways to extend it:
* add an option to export xprv
* with #19136 it'll be possible to return normalised descriptors suitable for a watch-only purposes
The output is compatible with `importdescriptors` command so it could be easily used for backup/recover purposes.
**Output example:**
```json
[
{
"desc": "wpkh(tpubD6NzVbkrYhZ4WW6E2ZETFyNfq2hfF23SKxqSGFvUpPAY58jmmuBybwqwFihAyQPk9KnwTt5516NDZRJ7k5QPeKjy7wuVd5WvXNxwwAs5tUD/*)#nhavpr5h",
"timestamp": 1296688602,
"active": false,
"range": [
0,
999
],
"next": 0
}
]
```
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
re-ACK 647b81b709 rebased to master, debug builds cleanly, reviewed diff since last review, tested with a descriptor wallet (and with a legacy wallet)
achow101:
re-ACK 647b81b
Tree-SHA512: 51a3620bb17c836c52cecb066d4fa9d5ff418af56809046eaee0528c4dc240a4e90fff5711ba96e399c6664e00b9ee8194e33852b1b9e75af18061296e19a8a7
a6739cc868 rpc: Add specific error code for "wallet already loaded" (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Add a separate RPC error code for "wallet already loaded" to avoid having to match on message to detect this.
Requested by shesek for rust-bitcoinrpc.
If concept ACKed needs:
- [ ] Release note
- [x] A functional test (updated the existing test to make it pass, I think this is enough)
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
Code Review ACK a6739cc868
promag:
Code review ACK a6739cc868.
Tree-SHA512: 9091872e6ea148aec733705d6af330f72a02f23b936b892ac28f9023da7430af6332418048adbee6014305b812316391812039e9180f7f3362d11f206c13b7d0
2a39ccf133 Add include for std::bind. (sinetek)
Pull request description:
Hi, this patch adds in <functional> because the GUI code makes use of std::bind.
That's all.
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
utACK 2a39ccf133
Tree-SHA512: fb5ac07d9cd5d006182b52857b289a9926362a2f1bfa4f7f1c78a088670e2ccf39ca28214781df82e8de3909fa3e69685fe1124a7e3ead758575839f5f2277a9
a2a3f4cd8d qt: drop workaround for QTBUG-42503 which was fixed in Qt 5.5.0 (Pavol Rusnak)
Pull request description:
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/issues/101
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
Tested ACK a2a3f4cd8d -
Tree-SHA512: 9ccbc20ff7991ec70cac7d4e4413f9d80a1de453e217d03927a5f167e87eae7f369f0ad437c40c8107e5384c5c5c758659ed0db923837a38f8d705f01f9cb798
232d1f92bb Add information to "Confirm fee bump" window (Prayank)
Pull request description:
+ Add information in bump fee confirmation box according to the documentation: https://bitcoincore.org/en/doc/0.20.0/rpc/wallet/bumpfee/
+ Workaround to fix issue: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/20795 in which user isn't aware of new inputs, outputs added to replacement transaction before broadcasting. Initial transaction had used coin control features and custom change address. Until the issue is fixed by change in coin selection algorithm we can add this warning.
+ Waiting for comments from devs who are working on coin selection algorithm PRs or involved in related research. However got two comments from Luke Dashjr and Pieter Wuille:
_luke-jr: Reducing the change output also could be a privacy problem, since it identifies which output was change._
_sipa: Wallet doesn't know the original transaction was using coin control. So I think its expected that if you use automatic fee bumping, you'll get whatever the coin selection algorithm decides. As for why its not decreasing the change and instead adding another input, that may be a bug._ (IRC: #bitcoin-core-dev)
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
Tested ACK - 232d1f92bb
Tree-SHA512: 2ff65db1ddb1d4a45f82670b6ca303a0bf48acf3d09defffc21f44ec81cb6182268959706f592f3442aae5db48f43b8ea86973d74ec2721be93d209ce0414953
f0f8b1a076 fuzz: Add UBSan suppressions needed for fuzz tests to not warn under -fsanitize=integer (practicalswift)
58232e3ffb fuzz: Avoid -fsanitize=integer warnings in fuzzing harnesses (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Add UBSan suppressions needed for fuzz tests to not warn under `-fsanitize=integer`.
Avoid `-fsanitize=integer` warnings in fuzzing harnesses.
Suppressed warnings (excluding warnings from `src/crypto/` and `src/test/`):
```
addrman.cpp:306:24: runtime error: implicit conversion from type 'long' of value 5190149478 (64-bit, signed) to type 'uint32_t' (aka 'unsigned int') changed the value to 895182182 (32-bit, unsigned)
addrman.h:446:43: runtime error: implicit conversion from type 'int' of value -22 (32-bit, signed) to type 'const uint8_t' (aka 'const unsigned char') changed the value to 234 (8-bit, unsigned)
arith_uint256.cpp:32:35: runtime error: left shift of 1712128 by 24 places cannot be represented in type 'uint32_t' (aka 'unsigned int')
arith_uint256.cpp:47:39: runtime error: left shift of 4294966784 by 31 places cannot be represented in type 'uint32_t' (aka 'unsigned int')
chain.cpp:151:12: runtime error: implicit conversion from type 'int' of value -1 (32-bit, signed) to type 'unsigned long' changed the value to 18446744073709551615 (64-bit, unsigned)
coins.cpp:114:22: runtime error: unsigned integer overflow: 0 - 96 cannot be represented in type 'unsigned long'
compressor.cpp:162:33: runtime error: unsigned integer overflow: 15617702637291228364 * 10 cannot be represented in type 'unsigned long'
compressor.cpp:188:11: runtime error: unsigned integer overflow: 2265760372865400000 * 10 cannot be represented in type 'unsigned long'
hash.cpp:13:15: runtime error: left shift of 1692305888 by 15 places cannot be represented in type 'uint32_t' (aka 'unsigned int')
pubkey.h:152:23: runtime error: unsigned integer overflow: 0 - 1 cannot be represented in type 'unsigned int'
streams.h:570:31: runtime error: left shift of 350879 by 52 places cannot be represented in type 'uint64_t' (aka 'unsigned long')
util/bip32.cpp:57:36: runtime error: left shift of 3241096244 by 1 places cannot be represented in type 'unsigned int'
util/strencodings.cpp:562:38: runtime error: implicit conversion from type 'unsigned char' of value 255 (8-bit, unsigned) to type 'char' changed the value to -1 (8-bit, signed)
util/strencodings.h:164:24: runtime error: implicit conversion from type 'int' of value -74 (32-bit, signed) to type 'unsigned long' changed the value to 18446744073709551542 (64-bit, unsigned)
```
The warnings above happen here:
32b191fb66/src/addrman.cpp (L306)32b191fb66/src/addrman.h (L446)32b191fb66/src/arith_uint256.cpp (L32)32b191fb66/src/arith_uint256.cpp (L47)32b191fb66/src/chain.cpp (L151)32b191fb66/src/coins.cpp (L114)32b191fb66/src/compressor.cpp (L162)32b191fb66/src/compressor.cpp (L188)32b191fb66/src/hash.cpp (L13)32b191fb66/src/pubkey.h (L152)32b191fb66/src/streams.h (L570)32b191fb66/src/util/bip32.cpp (L57)32b191fb66/src/util/strencodings.cpp (L562)32b191fb66/src/util/strencodings.h (L164)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK f0f8b1a076🤚
Tree-SHA512: a8f04f7cc055d03653161de1d9d14d106a6280cea1e86a1243abcd57cf8e61dcf5f731d0ab0da5b390790e816022ff7a70759a641463bc7e3303076b8667009f
77114462f2 raise helpMessageDialog (randymcmillan)
Pull request description:
the raise() method brings the helpMessageDialog to the top if it is obscured by another window.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK 77114462f2.
hebasto:
ACK 77114462f2, tested on:
Tree-SHA512: 0d5b107aa9a5ce3891e88ef69f64461c8b23d17476b798691119e84bfc78e16b2491c798adb5d6cc347af3b7f18729593d7924090c336114a3cf34fbee344bfb
Check if "Coin Control features" are enabled to display warning before broadcasting replacement transaction
Workaround to fix issue: bitcoin/bitcoin#20795
Co-authored-by: Jon Atack <jon@atack.com>
After the merge of #18710, the linter is warning:
```bash
A new Boost dependency in the form of "boost/thread/mutex.hpp" appears to have been introduced:
src/sync.cpp:#include <boost/thread/mutex.hpp>
src/test/sync_tests.cpp:#include <boost/thread/mutex.hpp>
^---- failure generated from test/lint/lint-includes.sh
```
the interim #19337 was merged, which introduced more `boost::mutex` usage.
Given we no longer use `boost::mutex`, just remove the double lock test
and remaining includes.
8f0b64fb51 Better error messages for invalid addresses (Bezdrighin)
Pull request description:
This PR addresses #20809.
We add more detailed error messages in case an invalid address is provided inside the 'validateaddress' and 'getaddressinfo' RPC calls. This also covers the case when a user provides an address from a wrong network.
We also add a functional test to test the new error messages.
ACKs for top commit:
kristapsk:
ACK 8f0b64fb51
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 8f0b64fb51
Tree-SHA512: ca0f806ab573e96b79e98d9f8c810b81fa99c638d9b5e4d99dc18c8bd2568e6a802ec305fdfb2983574a97a19a46fd53b77645f8078fb77e9deb24ad2a22cf93
bb6fcc75d1 refactor: Drop boost::thread stuff in CCheckQueue (Hennadii Stepanov)
6784ac471b bench: Use CCheckQueue local thread pool (Hennadii Stepanov)
dba30695fc test: Use CCheckQueue local thread pool (Hennadii Stepanov)
01511776ac Add local thread pool to CCheckQueue (Hennadii Stepanov)
0ef938685b refactor: Use member initializers in CCheckQueue (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR:
- gets rid of `boost::thread_group` in the `CCheckQueue` class
- allows thread safety annotation usage in the `CCheckQueue` class
- is alternative to #14464 (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18710#issuecomment-616618525, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18710#issuecomment-617291612)
Also, with this PR (I hope) it could be easier to resurrect a bunch of brilliant ideas from #9938.
Related: #17307
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK bb6fcc75d1
LarryRuane:
ACK bb6fcc75d1
jonatack:
Code review ACK bb6fcc75d1 and verified rebase to master builds cleanly with unit/functional tests green
Tree-SHA512: fddeb720d5a391b48bb4c6fa58ed34ccc3f57862fdb8e641745c021841c8340e35c5126338271446cbd98f40bd5484f27926aa6c3e76fa478ba1efafe72e73c1
Currently it was not possible to run just the BlockToJsonVerboes benchmarsk because it did not set up everything it needed, running `bench_bitcoin -filter=BlockToJsonVerbose` caused this assert to fail:
```
bench_bitcoin: chainparams.cpp:506: const CChainParams& Params(): Assertion `globalChainParams' failed.
```
Initializing TestingSetup fixes this.
This commit addresses #20809.
We add an additional 'error' property in the result of 'validateaddress' in case the address is not valid that gives a short description of why the address in invalid. We also change the error message returned by 'getaddressinfo' in case the address is invalid.
This commit adds the CaptureMessage function. This will later be called
when any message is sent or received. The capture directory is fixed,
in a new folder "message_capture" in the datadir. Peers will then have
their own subfolders, named with their IP address and port, replacing
colons with underscores to keep compatibility with Windows. Inside,
received and sent messages will be captured into two binary files,
msgs_recv.dat and msgs_sent.dat.
e.g.
message_capture/203.0.113.7_56072/msgs_recv.dat
message_capture/203.0.113.7_56072/msgs_sent.dat
The format has been designed as to result in a minimal performance
impact. A parsing script is added in a later commit.
bf100f8170 [net] Cleanup InactivityChecks() and add commenting about time (John Newbery)
06fa85cd50 [net] InactivityCheck() takes a CNode reference (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
This is a pure refactor and should not change any behavior. It clarifies and documents the InactivityCheck() function
This makes #20721 easier to review. In particular, this function uses a mixture of (unmockable) system time and mockable time. It's important to understand where those are being used when reviewing #20721.
#20721 doesn't require this change, so if others don't agree that it's useful and makes review easier, then I'm happy to close this and just do #20721 directly.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK bf100f8170
MarcoFalke:
review ACK bf100f8170💫
Tree-SHA512: 7b001de2a5fbe8a6dc37baeae930db5775290afb2e8a6aecdf13161f1e5b06ef813bc6291d8ee5cefcf1e430c955ea702833a8db84192eebe6e6acf0b9304cb2
962444295d zmq: deduplicate 'sequence' publisher message creation/sending (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This small PR deduplicates common low-level creation and sending code for the 'sequence' zmq publisher message (methods `NotifyBlock{Connect,Disconnect}()`, `NotifyTransaction{Acceptance,Removal}()` in the class `CZMQPublishSequenceNotifier`) by introducing a helper function.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Code review re-ACK 962444295d per `git diff f231ffd 9624442`
instagibbs:
utACK 962444295d
Tree-SHA512: de0750d923f36d1a5751331e88eec8a1605cb88c93318830913210485e2bff712310484f18a0fb626df6ef32ce0b0cf57f4421ce62656e05fce7011a0c3c2d0e
f1694757dd guix: Fix typo (Carl Dong)
771c4b98a8 guix: README: Add darwin HOSTS entry (Carl Dong)
8dbf18cb1d guix: Check for macOS SDK before building anything (Carl Dong)
34b23f597e guix: Set ZERO_AR_DATE for darwin build determinism (Carl Dong)
f3835dc6a3 build: Make xorrisofs reproducible with -volume_date (Carl Dong)
c9eb4cf3a0 guix: Add support for darwin builds (Carl Dong)
37fe73a092 build: Add var printing target to src/Makefile.am (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
This PR brings our Guix builds on par with Gitian in terms of supported architectures.
Reviewers: if you run a build, please submit:
```
find output/ -type f -print0 | env LC_ALL=C sort -z | xargs -r0 sha256sum
```
So that we can compare hashes and ensure reproducibility!
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK f1694757dd - I think we can make some small usability improvements, but this is ok to merge now.
Tree-SHA512: 4af2b71654a9736467dcc681d10601c6eee37800d7847011a50585455b67b55d61742ca5604585f310a2fd75335b674e5e27dfb5169cb2f26e112aa4c411d8be
da9caa1ced Replace fs::absolute calls with AbsPathJoin calls (Kiminuo)
66576c4fd5 test: Clear forced -walletdir setting after wallet init_tests (Kiminuo)
Pull request description:
This adds better test coverage and will make it easier in #20744 to remove our dependency on the two-argument boost::filesystem::absolute() function which does not have a direct equivalent in C++17.
This PR doesn't change behavior aside from adding an assert and fixing a test bug.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Code review ACK da9caa1ced only doxygen improvements since my last review per `git diff d867d7a da9caa1`
MarcoFalke:
review ACK da9caa1ced📯
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK da9caa1ced. Just comment and test tweaks since previous review.
Tree-SHA512: c940ee60f3ba374d4927cf34cf12d27c4c735c94af591fbc0ca408c641b30f8f8fbcfe521d66bfbddf9877a1fc8cd99bd8a47ebcd2fa59789de6bd87a7b9cf4d
b396467053 locks: Annotate CTxMemPool::check to require cs_main (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
```
Currently, CTxMemPool::check locks CTxMemPool's own cs member, then
calls GetSpendHeight which locks cs_main. This can potentially cause an
undesirable lock invesion since CTxMemPool's cs is supposed to be locked
after cs_main.
This does not cause us any problems right now because all callers of
CTxMemPool already lock cs_main before calling CTxMemPool::check, which
means that the LOCK(cs_main) in GetSpendHeight becomes benign.
However, it is currently possible for new code to be added which calls
CTxMemPool::check without locking cs_main (which would be dangerous).
Therefore we should make it explicit that cs_main needs to be held
before calling CTxMemPool::check.
NOTE: After all review-only assertions are removed in "#20158 |
tree-wide: De-globalize ChainstateManager", and assuming that we
keep the changes in "validation: Pass in spendheight to
CTxMemPool::check", we can re-evaluate to see if this annotation
is still necessary.
```
-----
Previous discussions:
1. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20158#discussion_r520639845
2. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20158#pullrequestreview-557117202
3. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20749#discussion_r559425521
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK b396467053
MarcoFalke:
ACK b396467053
jonatack:
ACK b396467053 review and debug built, verified that `cs_main` is held by callers of `CTxMemPool::check()` in `PeerManagerImpl::ProcessOrphanTx()`, `PeerManagerImpl::ProcessMessage()`, and `CChainState::ActivateBestChainStep()`
Tree-SHA512: 4635cddb4aa1af9532bb657b2f9c4deec4568d16ba28c574eae91bb77368cd40e23c3c720a9de11cec78e7ad678a44a5e25af67f13214b86b56e777e0c35a026
abb6fa7285 fuzz: Initialize a full TestingSetup where appropriate (Carl Dong)
713314abfa fuzz: Consolidate fuzzing TestingSetup initialization (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
```
Previously, the {Basic,}TestingSetup for fuzzers were set up in many ways:
1. Calling InitializeFuzzingContext, which implicitly constructs a static
const BasicTestingSetup
2. Directly constructing a static const BasicTestingSetup in the initialize_*
function
3. Directly constructing a static TestingSetup and reproducing the
initialization arguments (I'm assuming because
InitializeFuzzingContext only initializes a BasicTestingSetup)
The new, relatively-simple MakeFuzzingContext function allows us to
consolidate these methods of initialization by being flexible enough to
be used in all situations. It:
1. Is templated so that we can choose to initialize any of
the *TestingSetup classes
2. Has sane defaults which are often used in fuzzers but are also
easily overridable
3. Returns a unique_ptr, explicitly transferring ownership to the caller
to deal with according to its situation
```
~~Question for fuzzing people: was it intentional that `src/test/fuzz/net.cpp` would directly instantiate the `BasicTestingSetup` and thus omit the `"-nodebuglogfile"` flag?~~ [Answered](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20946#issuecomment-761537108)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK abb6fa7285
Tree-SHA512: 96a5ca6f4cd5ea0e9483b60165b31ae3e9003918c700a7f6ade48010f419f2a6312e10b816b3187f1d263798827571866e4c4ac0bbfb2e0c79dfad254cda68e7
Previously, the {Basic,}TestingSetup for fuzzers were set up in many ways:
1. Calling InitializeFuzzingContext, which implicitly constructs a static
const BasicTestingSetup
2. Directly constructing a static const BasicTestingSetup in the initialize_*
function
3. Directly constructing a static TestingSetup and reproducing the
initialization arguments (I'm assuming because
InitializeFuzzingContext only initializes a BasicTestingSetup)
The new, relatively-simple MakeFuzzingContext function allows us to
consolidate these methods of initialization by being flexible enough to
be used in all situations. It:
1. Is templated so that we can choose to initialize any of
the *TestingSetup classes
2. Has sane defaults which are often used in fuzzers but are also
easily overridable
3. Returns a unique_ptr, explicitly transferring ownership to the caller
to deal with according to its situation
