d044e0ec7d refactor: Remove override for final overriders (Hennadii Stepanov)
1551cea2d5 refactor: Use override for non-final overriders (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Two commits are split out from #16710 to make reviewing [easier](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16710#issuecomment-625760894).
From [C++ FAQ](https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines.html#c128-virtual-functions-should-specify-exactly-one-of-virtual-override-or-final):
> C.128: Virtual functions should specify exactly one of virtual, override, or final
> **Reason** Readability. Detection of mistakes. Writing explicit `virtual`, `override`, or `final` is self-documenting and enables the compiler to catch mismatch of types and/or names between base and derived classes. However, writing more than one of these three is both redundant and a potential source of errors.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK d044e0ec7d: consistent use of `override` prevents bugs + patch looks correct + Travis happy
MarcoFalke:
ACK d044e0ec7d, based on my understanding that adding `override` or `final` to a function must always be correct, unless it doesn't compile!?
vasild:
ACK d044e0ec7
Tree-SHA512: 245fd9b99b8b5cbf8694061f892cb3435f3378c97ebed9f9401ce86d21890211f2234bcc39c9f0f79a4d2806cb31bf8ce41a0f9c2acef4f3a2ac5beca6b077cf
Also, mark feebumper bilingual_str as Untranslated
They are technical and have previously not been translated either.
It is questionable whether they can even appear in the GUI.
Common errors and warnings should be translated when displayed in the
GUI, but not translated when displayed elsewhere. The wallet method
CreateWalletFromFile does not know its caller, so this commit changes it
to return a bilingual_str to the caller.
This reverts commit 0933a37078 from
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18160 which no longer an optimization
since commit "gui: Avoid wallet tryGetBalances calls before TransactionChanged
or BlockTip notifications".
This change is intended to make the bitcoin node and its rpc, network
and gui interfaces more responsive while the wallet is in use. Currently
because the node's cs_main mutex is always locked before the wallet's
cs_wallet mutex (to prevent deadlocks), cs_main currently stays locked
while the wallet does relatively slow things like creating and listing
transactions.
This commit only remmove chain lock tacking in wallet code, and invert
lock order from cs_main, cs_wallet to cs_wallet, cs_main.
must happen at once to avoid any deadlock. Previous commit were only
removing Chain::Lock methods to Chain interface and enforcing they
take cs_main.
Remove LockChain method from CWallet and Chain::Lock interface.
48973402d8 wallet: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in CWallet::GetKeyBirthTimes (Russell Yanofsky)
e958ff9ab5 wallet: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in CWallet::CreateTransaction (Russell Yanofsky)
c0d07dc4cb wallet: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in CWallet::ScanForWalletTransactions (Russell Yanofsky)
1be8ff280c wallet: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in rescanblockchain (Russell Yanofsky)
3cb85ac594 wallet refactor: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in CWallet::RescanFromTime (Russell Yanofsky)
f7ba881bc6 wallet: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in listsinceblock (Russell Yanofsky)
bc96a9bfc6 wallet: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in importmulti (Russell Yanofsky)
25a9fcf9e5 wallet: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in importwallet and dumpwallet (Russell Yanofsky)
c1694ce6bb wallet: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in importprunedfunds (Russell Yanofsky)
ade5f87971 wallet refactor: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in qt wallettests (Russell Yanofsky)
f6da44ccce wallet: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in tryGetTxStatus and tryGetBalances (Russell Yanofsky)
bf30cd4922 refactor: Add interfaces::FoundBlock class to selectively return block data (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This is a set of changes updating wallet code to make fewer calls to `Chain::Lock` methods, so the `Chain::Lock` class will be easier to remove in #16426 with fewer code changes and small changes to behavior.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 48973402d8, only change is fixing bug 📀
fjahr:
re-ACK 48973402d8, reviewed rebase and changes since last review, built and ran tests locally
ariard:
Coce Review ACK 4897340, only changes are one suggested by last review on more accurate variable naming, human-readable output, args comments in `findCommonAncestor`
Tree-SHA512: cfd2f559f976b6faaa032794c40c9659191d5597b013abcb6c7968d36b2abb2b14d4e596f8ed8b9a077e96522365261299a241a939b3111eaf729ba0c3ef519b
3ce16ad2f9 refactor: Use psbt forward declaration (Russell Yanofsky)
1dde238f2c Add ChainClient setMockTime, getWallets methods (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10).
These changes are needed to set mock times, and get wallet interface pointers correctly when
wallet code is running in a different process from node code in #10102
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 3ce16ad2f9🔙
promag:
Code review ACK 3ce16ad2f9.
Tree-SHA512: 6c093bfcd68adf5858a1aade4361cdb7fb015496673504ac7a93d0bd2595215047184551d6fd526baa27782331cd2819ce45c4cf923b205ce93ac29e485b5dd8
Previous versions assumed absence of an entry in mapAddressBook indicated change.
This no longer holds true (due to bugs) and will shortly be made intentional.
Renaming the field helps ensure that old code using mapAddressBook directly gets checked for necessary rebasing.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i -e 's/mapAddressBook/m_address_book/g' $(git grep -l 'mapAddressBook' ./src)
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
This is a step toward removing the Chain::Lock class and reducing cs_main
locking.
This change only affects behavior in the case where wallet last block processed
falls behind the chain tip, where it will treat the last block processed as the
current tip.
This is a step toward removing the Chain::Lock class and reducing cs_main
locking.
This change affects behavior in a few small ways.
- If there's no max_height specified, percentage progress is measured ending at
wallet last processed block instead of node tip
- More consistent error reporting: Early check to see if start_block is on the
active chain is removed, so start_block is always read and the triggers an
error if it's unavailable
This is a step toward removing the Chain::Lock class and reducing cs_main
locking.
This change only affects behavior in the case where wallet last block processed
falls behind the chain tip. The rescanblockchain error height error checking
will just be stricter in this case and only accept values up to the last
processed height
This is a step toward removing the Chain::Lock class and reducing cs_main
locking.
This change only affects behavior in the case where wallet last block processed
falls behind the chain tip. Previously listsinceblock might not have returned
all transactions up to the claimed "lastblock" value in this case, resulting in
race conditions and potentially missing transactions in cases where
listsinceblock was called in a loop like
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/14338#issuecomment-426706574
This is a step toward removing the Chain::Lock class and reducing cs_main
locking.
This change only affects behavior in the case where wallet last block processed
falls behind the chain tip, in which case it may use a more accurate rescan
time.
This is a step toward removing the Chain::Lock class and reducing cs_main
locking.
This change only affects behavior in the case where wallet last block processed
falls behind the chain tip, in which case the "Block not found in chain" error
will be stricter and not allow importing data from a blocks between the wallet
last processed tip and the current node tip.
This is a step toward removing the Chain::Lock class and reducing cs_main
locking.
It also helps ensure the GUI display stays up to date in the case where the
node chain height runs ahead of wallet last block processed height.
FoundBlock class allows interfaces::Chain::findBlock to return more block
information without having lots of optional output parameters. FoundBlock class
is also used by other chain methods in upcoming commits.
There is mostly no change in behavior. Only exception is
CWallet::RescanFromTime now throwing NonFatalCheckError instead of
std::logic_error.
41b0baf43c gui: Handle WalletModel::unload asynchronous (João Barbosa)
ab31b9d6fe Fix wallet unload race condition (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This PR consists in two fixes. The first fixes a concurrency issues with `boost::signals2`. The second fixes a wallet model destruction while it's being used.
From boost signal documentation at https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_72_0/doc/html/signals2/thread-safety.html:
> When a signal is invoked by calling signal::operator(), the invocation first acquires a lock on the signal's mutex. Then it obtains a handle to the signal's slot list and combiner. Next it releases the signal's mutex, before invoking the combiner to iterate through the slot list.
This means that `UnregisterValidationInterface` doesn't prevent more calls to that interface. The fix consists in capturing the `shared_ptr<CValidationInterface>` in each internal slot.
The GUI bug is fixed by using a `Qt::QueuedConnection` in the `WalletModel::unload` connection.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 41b0baf43c. Only change is moving assert as suggested
hebasto:
ACK 41b0baf43c, tested on Linux Mint 19.3.
Tree-SHA512: 4f712d8de65bc1214411831250de5dc0a9fd505fb84da5baf9f2cc4d551bc3abffc061616f00afe43dba7525af2cd96c9b54aeead9383145e3b8801f25d85f50
0933a37078 gui: Avoid Wallet::GetBalance in WalletModel::pollBalanceChanged (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Each 250ms the slot `WalletModel::pollBalanceChanged` is called which, at worst case, calls `Wallet::GetBalance`. This is a waste of resources since most of the time there aren't new transactions or new blocks. Fix this by early checking if cache is dirty or not.
The actual balance computation can still hang the GUI thread but that is tracked in #16874 and should be fixed with a solution similar to #17135.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 0933a37078, I have not tested the code, but I have reviewed it and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
jonasschnelli:
utACK 0933a37078
instagibbs:
ACK 0933a37078
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 0933a37078, but I would prefer (not strongly) for #17905 to be merged first. This PR can be simpler if it is based on #17905, so tryGetBalances can just be left alone instead of changing into to a more complicated tryGetBalancesIfNeeded function, and then getting changed back later when we want to optimize it out.
jonatack:
ACK 0933a37078 based primarily on code review, despite a lot of manual testing with a large 177MB wallet.
Tree-SHA512: 18db35bf33a7577666658c8cb0b57308c8474baa5ea95bf1468cd8531a69857d8915584f6ac505874717aa6aabeb1b506ac77630f8acdb6651afab89275e38a1
ff9c671b11 refactor: Work around GCC 9 `-Wredundant-move` warning (Russell Yanofsky)
b837b334db net: Fail instead of truncate command name in CMessageHeader (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Fixes all 3 from #16992 (see commits)
- net: Fail instead of truncate command name in CMessageHeader
- refactor: Use std::move workaround for unique_ptr upcast only when necessary
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK ff9c671b11 -- patch looks correct
sipa:
utACK ff9c671b11
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK ff9c671b11. Looks good and seems to pass travis, modulo a timeout on one build
hebasto:
ACK ff9c671b11, tested on Fedora 31:
Tree-SHA512: 52d8c13aaf0d56f9bc546a98d7f853eae21f7e325b202fdeb2286b19a9a0ee308634c644b039f60ad8043421e382381cbf1bce58d9f807547f928621c7d245d0
Currently it's possible for ReleaseWallet to delete the CWallet pointer while
it is processing BlockConnected, etc chain notifications.
To fix this, unregister from notifications earlier in UnloadWallet instead of
ReleaseWallet, and use a new RegisterSharedValidationInterface function to
prevent the CValidationInterface shared_ptr from being deleted until the last
notification is actually finished.
c3857c5fcb wallet: remove CreateTotalBumpTransaction() (Jon Atack)
4a0b27bb01 wallet: remove totalfee from createBumpTransaction() (Jon Atack)
e347cfa9a7 rpc: remove deprecated totalFee arg from RPC bumpfee (Jon Atack)
bd05f96d79 test: delete wallet_bumpfee_totalfee_deprecation.py (Jon Atack)
a6d1ab8caa test: update bumpfee testing from totalFee to fee_rate (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Since 0.19, fee-bumping using `totalFee` was deprecated in #15996 and replaced by `fee_rate` in #16727. This changeset removes it.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK c3857c5fcb
Tree-SHA512: c1bb15d664baf4d2dea06981f36384af02057d125c51fcbc8640b9d5563532187c7b84aa952f7b575255a88ce383ed4d7495bec920a47b05b6fc0d432dce1f00
Replace by privateKeysDisabled method to avoid need for GUI to reference
internal wallet flags.
Also remove adjacent WalletModel canGetAddresses wrapper that serves no purpose
and make Wallet::canGetAddresses non-const so it can be implemented by IPC
classes in #10102.
e57980b473 [mempool] Remove NotifyEntryAdded and NotifyEntryRemoved callbacks (John Newbery)
2dd561f361 [validation] Remove pool member from ConnectTrace (John Newbery)
969b65f3f5 [validation] Remove NotifyEntryRemoved callback from ConnectTrace (John Newbery)
5613f9842b [validation] Remove conflictedTxs from PerBlockConnectTrace (John Newbery)
cdb893443c [validation interface] Remove vtxConflicted from BlockConnected (John Newbery)
1168394d75 [wallet] Notify conflicted transactions in TransactionRemovedFromMempool (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
These boost signals were added in #9371, before we had a `TransactionRemovedFromMempool` method in the validation interface. The `NotifyEntryAdded` callback was used by validation to build a vector of conflicted transactions when connecting a block, which the wallet was notified of in the `BlockConnected` CValidationInterface callback.
Now that we have a `TransactionRemovedFromMempool` callback, we can fire that signal directly from the mempool for conflicted transactions.
Note that #9371 was implemented to ensure `-walletnotify` events were fired for these conflicted transaction. We inadvertently stopped sending these notifications in #16624 (Sep 2019 commit 7e89994). We should probably fix that, but in a different PR.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Re-ACK e57980b
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK e57980b473, no code changes since previous review, but helpful new code comments have been added and the PR description is now more clear about where the old code came from
Tree-SHA512: 3bdbaf1ef2731e788462d4756e69c42a1efdcf168691ce1bbfdaa4b7b55ac3c5b1fd4ab7b90bcdec653703600501b4224d252cfc086aef28f9ce0da3b0563a69
NotifyEntryAdded never had any subscribers so can be removed.
Since ConnectTrace no longer subscribes to NotifyEntryRemoved, there are
now no subscribers.
The CValidationInterface TransactionAddedToMempool and
TransactionRemovedFromMempool methods can now provide this
functionality. There's no need for a special notifications framework for
the mempool.
Not all ScriptPubKeyMans will be able to provide private keys,
but pubkeys and scripts should be. So only provide public-only
SigningProviders, i.e. ones that can help with Solving.
