84716b134e Add "index/blockfilterindex -> validation -> index/blockfilterindex" to expected circular dependencies (Jonas Schnelli)
ab3a0a2fb9 Add functional test for blockfilterindex in prune-mode (Jonas Schnelli)
c286a22f7b Add debug startup parameter -fastprune for more effective pruning tests (Jonas Schnelli)
5e112269c3 Avoid pruning below the blockfilterindex sync height (Jonas Schnelli)
00d57ff768 Avoid accessing nullpointer in BaseIndex::GetSummary() (Jonas Schnelli)
6abe9f5b11 Allow blockfilter in conjunction with prune (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
Maintaining the blockfilterindexes in prune mode is possible and may lead to efficient p2p based rescans of wallets (restore backups, import/sweep keys) beyond the prune height (rescans not part of that PR).
This PR allows running the blockfilterindex(es) in conjunction with pruning.
* Bitcoind/Qt will shutdown during startup when missing block data has been detected ([re]enable `-blockfilterindex` when we already have pruned)
* manual block pruning is disabled during blockfilterindex sync
* auto-pruning is delayed during blockfilterindex sync
ToDos:
* [x] Functional tests
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Code review ACK 84716b1
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 84716b134e. Only changes since last review were suggested new FindFilesToPrune argument and test.
benthecarman:
tACK 84716b134e
Tree-SHA512: 91d832c6c562c463f7ec7655c08956385413a99a896640b9737bda0183607fac530435d03d87c3c0e70c61ccdfe73fe8f3639bc7d26d33ca7e60925ebb97d77a
1afc0e4aa1 doc: remove potentially confusing ChainstateManager comment (James O'Beirne)
769a1ef9fd test: Add tests with maleated snapshot data (Fabian Jahr)
4d8de04f32 tests: add snapshot activation test (James O'Beirne)
31d225274f tests: add deterministic chain generation unittest fixture (James O'Beirne)
6606a4f8c6 move-onlyish: break out CreateUTXOSnapshot from dumptxoutset (James O'Beirne)
ad949ba449 txdb: don't reset during in-memory cache resize (James O'Beirne)
f6e2da5fb7 simplify ChainstateManager::SnapshotBlockhash() return semantics (James O'Beirne)
7a6c46b37e chainparams: add allowed assumeutxo values (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the [assumeutxo project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11):
Parent PR: #15606
Issue: #15605
Specification: https://github.com/jamesob/assumeutxo-docs/tree/master/proposal
---
This change proposes logic for activating UTXO snapshots, which is unused at the moment aside from an included unittest. There are a few moveonyish/refactoring commits to allow for halfway decent unittests.
Basic structure is included for specifying and checking the assumeutxo hash values used to validate activated snapshots. Initially I had specified a few height/hash pairs for mainnet in this change, but because of the security-critical nature of those parameters, I figured it was better to leave their inclusion to a future PR that includes only that change - my intent being that reviewers will be more likely to verify those parameters firsthand in a dedicated PR.
Aside from that and the snapshot activation logic, there are a few related changes:
- ~~allow caching the `nChainTx` value in the CCoinsViewDB; this is set during snapshot activation. Because we don't necessarily have access to the full chain at the time of snapshot load, this value is communicated through the snapshot metadata and must be cached within the chainstate to survive restarts.~~
- break out `CreateUTXOSnapshot()` from dumptxoutset. This is essentially a move-only change to allow the reuse of snapshot creation logic from within unittests.
- ...and a few other misc. changes that are solely related to unittests.
The move-onlyish commit is most easily reviewed with `--color-moved=zebra`.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Code review ACK 1afc0e4aa1
laanwj:
Code review ACK 1afc0e4aa1
Tree-SHA512: a4e4f0698f00a53ec298b5e8b7ef1c9fdf0185f95139d1b1f63cfdf6cbbd6d17b8c6e51bbf1de2e5f1a946bf49f8466232698ef55acce5a012c80b067da366ea
3f8776a139 Re-add dead code detection (flack)
Pull request description:
This re-adds unreachable code detection for Python based on `vulture`.
Effectively, this reverts f4beb4996d. The difference to the previous version is that this runs with the `--min-confidence 100` setting. From https://pypi.org/project/vulture/:
> Use `--min-confidence 100` to only report code that is guaranteed to be unused within the analyzed files.
So this should avoid the previous issues where static analysis had wrong positives due to the dynamic nature of Python code by only reporting things that are unambiguous (such as code after a `return` statement). As such, there is not suppressions list.
My motivation was mainly #21081 which would have been caught by this (as can be seen by the CI run failing). This is still marked as draft because #21081 is needed to get the linter to pass. Also, there is a second problem that this found (see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19509/files#r571454691). From what I can tell, this is a spurious type comment that could just be removed (or if that line has no side effects it could also be deleted altogether?). I could add a commit here to fix it, but I wanted to see if there is interest in having this linter again in the first place
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 3f8776a139
Tree-SHA512: 52314ad4f627d969de1eb15375ca677ed86a2e816fe773756a1ce22421214ba407b5a09a4bf701a3aab1a10c7b336f548e4cef3327edf154acba55e987db21f6
060a2a64d4 ci: remove boost thread installation (fanquake)
06e1d7d81d build: don't build or use Boost Thread (fanquake)
7097add83c refactor: replace Boost shared_mutex with std shared_mutex in sigcache (fanquake)
8e55981ef8 refactor: replace Boost shared_mutex with std shared_mutex in cuckoocache tests (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This replaces `boost::shared_mutex` and `boost::unique_lock` with [`std::shared_mutex`](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/thread/shared_mutex) & [`std::unique_lock`](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/thread/unique_lock).
Even though [some concerns were raised](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16684#issuecomment-726214696) in #16684 with regard to `std::shared_mutex` being unsafe to use across some glibc versions, I still think this change is an improvement. As I mentioned in #21022, I also think trying to restrict standard library feature usage based on bugs in glibc is not only hard to do, but it's not currently clear exactly how we do that in practice (does it also extend to patching out use in our dependencies, should we be implementing more runtime checks for features we are using, when do we consider an affected glibc "old enough" not to worry about? etc). If you take a look through the [glibc bug tracker](https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/describecomponents.cgi?product=glibc) you'll no doubt find plenty of (active) bug reports for standard library code we already using. Obviously not to say we shouldn't try and avoid buggy code where possible.
Two other points:
[Cory mentioned in #21022](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21022#issuecomment-769274179):
> It also seems reasonable to me to worry that boost hits the same underlying glibc bug, and we've just not happened to trigger the right conditions yet.
Moving away from Boost to the standard library also removes the potential for differences related to Boosts configuration. Boost has multiple versions of `shared_mutex`, and what you end up using, and what it's backed by depends on:
* The version of Boost.
* The platform you're building for.
* Which version of `BOOST_THREAD_VERSION` is defined: (2,3,4 or 5) default=2. (see [here](https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_70_0/doc/html/thread/build.html#thread.build.configuration) for some of the differences).
* Is `BOOST_THREAD_V2_SHARED_MUTEX` defined? (not by default). If so, you might get the ["less performant, but more robust"](https://github.com/boostorg/thread/issues/230#issuecomment-475937761) version of `shared_mutex`.
A lot of these factors are eliminated by our use of depends, but users will have varying configurations. It's also not inconceivable to think that a distro, or some package manager might start defining something like `BOOST_THREAD_VERSION=3`. Boost tried to change the default from 2 to 3 at one point.
With this change, we no longer use Boost Thread, so this PR also removes it from depends, the build system, CI etc.
Previous similar PRs were #19183 & #20922. The authors are included in the commits here.
Also related to #21022 - pthread sanity checking.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 060a2a64d4
vasild:
ACK 060a2a64d4
Tree-SHA512: 572d14d8c9de20bc434511f20d3f431836393ff915b2fe9de5a47a02dca76805ad5c3fc4cceecb4cd43f3ba939a0508178c4e60e62abdbaaa6b3e8db20b75b03
bb6fcc75d1 refactor: Drop boost::thread stuff in CCheckQueue (Hennadii Stepanov)
6784ac471b bench: Use CCheckQueue local thread pool (Hennadii Stepanov)
dba30695fc test: Use CCheckQueue local thread pool (Hennadii Stepanov)
01511776ac Add local thread pool to CCheckQueue (Hennadii Stepanov)
0ef938685b refactor: Use member initializers in CCheckQueue (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR:
- gets rid of `boost::thread_group` in the `CCheckQueue` class
- allows thread safety annotation usage in the `CCheckQueue` class
- is alternative to #14464 (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18710#issuecomment-616618525, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18710#issuecomment-617291612)
Also, with this PR (I hope) it could be easier to resurrect a bunch of brilliant ideas from #9938.
Related: #17307
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK bb6fcc75d1
LarryRuane:
ACK bb6fcc75d1
jonatack:
Code review ACK bb6fcc75d1 and verified rebase to master builds cleanly with unit/functional tests green
Tree-SHA512: fddeb720d5a391b48bb4c6fa58ed34ccc3f57862fdb8e641745c021841c8340e35c5126338271446cbd98f40bd5484f27926aa6c3e76fa478ba1efafe72e73c1
fa4435e22f Replace boost::optional with std::optional (MarcoFalke)
fa7e803f3e Remove unused MakeOptional (MarcoFalke)
fadd4029dc psbt: Assert that tx has a value in UpdatePSBTOutput (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Now that we can use std::optional from the vanilla standard library, drop the third-party boost dependency
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK fa4435e22f: patch looks correct!
laanwj:
code review ACK fa4435e22f
hebasto:
ACK fa4435e22f, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: 50c5a1a130cac65e043e0177ba5b009fc2ba09343af4e23322ff2eb32184a55f8f2dea66e7a1b9d9acf56bc164eef4e47448750549a07f3b661199ac9bf9afef
34c80d9eee test: Add option to git-subtree-check to do full check, add help (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
This adds a brief help text to `git-subtree-check.sh` and adds an option to do a full remote check instead of having two different code paths with a successful exit status. Also make it explicit that the CI is not doing this.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
tested ACK 34c80d9eee
Tree-SHA512: 20f672fd3b3c1d633eccf9998fdd738194cdd7d10cc206691f2dcc28bbbf8187b8d06b87814f875a06145b179f5ca1f4f4f9922972be72759cf5ac6e0c11abd1
This adds a brief help text to `git-subtree-check.sh` and adds and an
option to do a full remote check instead of having two different code
paths with a successful exit status. Also make it explicit that the CI
is not doing this.
This moves the CBlockPolicyEstimator to the NodeContext, which get rids
of two globals and allows us to conditionally create the
CBlockPolicyEstimator (and to remove a circular dep).
Signed-off-by: Antoine Poinsot <darosior@protonmail.com>
8f7b930475 Drop the leading 0 from the version number (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Removes the leading 0 from the version number. The minor version, which we had been using as the major version, is now the major version. The revision, which we had been using as the minor version, is now the minor version. The revision number is dropped. The build number is promoted to being part of the version number. This also avoids issues where it was accidentally not included in the version number.
The CLIENT_VERSION remains the same format as previous as previously, as the Major version was 0 so it never actually got included in it.
The user agent string formatter is updated to follow this new versioning.
***
Honestly I'm just tired of all of the people asking for "1.0" that maybe this'll shut them up. Skip the whole 1.0 thing and go straight to version 22.0!
Also, this means that the terminology we commonly use lines up with how the variables are named. So major versions are actually bumping the major version number, etc.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 8f7b930475
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 8f7b930475🎻
Tree-SHA512: b5c3fae14d4c0a9c0ab3b1db7c949ecc0ac3537646306b13d98dd0efc17c489cdd16d43f0a24aaa28e9c4a92ea360500e05480a335b03f9fb308010cdd93a436
faaf9c58e4 remove CRPCCommand constructor that takes rpcfn_type function pointer (MarcoFalke)
fa19bb2cd8 remove dead rpc code (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Remove the CRPCCommand arguments, now that they are asserted to be equal and thus redundant
### Future work
> Here or follow up, makes sense to also assert type of returned UniValue?
Sure, but let's not get ahead of ourselves. I am going to submit any further works as follow-ups, including:
* Removing all python regex linters on the args, now that RPCMan can be used to generate any output, including the cli.cpp table
* Auto-formatting and sanity checking the RPCExamples with RPCMan
* Checking passed-in json in self-check. Removing redundant checks
* Checking returned json against documentation to avoid regressions or false documentation
* Compile the RPC documentation at compile-time to ensure it doesn't change at runtime and is completely static
### Bugs found
* The assert identified issue #18607
* The changes itself fixed bug #19250
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
tested ACK faaf9c58e4
promag:
Tested ACK faaf9c58e4.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK faaf9c58e4. Two obviously good simplifications.
Tree-SHA512: 5de3b440f7b2ed2c3e86655d4f0e2e5df9c67e8ce3c7817d5ea5311d1a38690f2f3e28fab41aad6936be9fc884326d037e5f19e85d4d2fe281474dada13911ee
46756a6987 depends: Fix PYTHONPATH setting in config.site.in (Carl Dong)
618cbd2c1a lint: Also lint files with shellcheck directive (Carl Dong)
6c7e8f067d depends: Allow relative CONFIG_SITE path env var (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
This changeset:
1. Allows the `CONFIG_SITE` env var to be a relative path rather than requiring an absolute one
2. Enables linting of the `config.site.in` file with `shellcheck` in our linting scripts
3. Sets the `PYTHONPATH` var sensibly in `config.site.in`
Please see commit messages for more details
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 46756a6987
Tree-SHA512: 744089b9f6e5604e56466d9a3e64563f9183a70f7e300ac9ae6248f0f17c0b53fe28a2c41d43c5ffe5da825f53c2ca21f21aacba0579442da3056fb0c4b81454
Removes the leading 0 from the version number. The minor version, which
we had been using as the major version, is now the major version. The
revision, which we had been using as the minor version, is now the minor
version. The revision number is dropped. The build number is promoted to
being part of the version number. This also avoids issues where it was
accidentally not included in the version number.
The CLIENT_VERSION remains the same format as previous as previously,
the Major version was 0 so that was never a factor in CLIENT_VERSION.
Files like config.site.in are not referenced by any other script in our
tree, so we need to mark it manually with a "shellcheck shell="
directive and make sure that shellcheck is run on them.
3491bf358a test: Mention commit id in scripted diff error (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Add commit id to make spotting the issue easier.
ACKs for top commit:
robot-dreams:
ACK 3491bf358a
sipa:
utACK 3491bf358a
hebasto:
~ACK~ Concept ACK 3491bf358a, should help in situations like https://travis-ci.org/github/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/732481553
Tree-SHA512: 1ae66fa760f9e5d52e029bae71f6b5863f1efd7b95de3723ea09290944c9d7687f5ec6927aa115a3aebd6f2b993baa0c2433975c6ad5cd2858089013362eb599
e36f802fa4 lint: add C++ code linter (fanquake)
c4be50fea3 remove usage of boost::bind (fanquake)
Pull request description:
`boost::bind` usage was removed in #13743. However a new usage snuck in as
part of 2bc4c3eaf9 (#15225).
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK e36f802fa4
practicalswift:
ACK e36f802fa4 -- patch looks correct
Tree-SHA512: 2b0387c5443c184bcbf7df4849db1ed1296ff82c7b4ff0aff18334a400e56a472a972d18234d3866531a088d7a8da64688e58dc9f15daaad4048697c759d55ce
3340dbadd3 Remove -zapwallettxes (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
It's not clear what use there is to keeping `-zapwallettxes` given that it's intended usage has been superseded by `abandontransaction`. So this removes it outright.
Alternative to #19700
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
utACK 3340dbadd3
fanquake:
ACK 3340dbadd3 - remaining manpage references will get cleaned up pre-release.
Tree-SHA512: 3e58e1ef6f4f94894d012b93e88baba3fb9c2ad75b8349403f9ce95b80b50b0b4f443cb623cf76c355930db109f491b3442be3aa02972e841450ce52cf545fc8
-zapwallettxes is made a hidden option to inform users that it is
removed and they should be using abandontransaction to do the stuck
transaction thing.
ca185cf5a1 doc: Document differences in bitcoind and bitcoin-qt locale handling (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Document differences in `bitcoind` and `bitcoin-qt` locale handling.
Since this seems to be the root cause to the locale dependency issues we've seen over the years I thought it was worth documenting :)
Note that 1.) `QLocale` (used by Qt), 2.) C locale (used by locale-sensitive C standard library functions/POSIX functions and some parts of the C++ standard library such as `std::to_string`) and 3.) C++ locale (used by the C++ input/output library) are three separate things. This comment is about the perhaps surprising interference with the C locale (2) that takes place as part of the Qt initialization.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK ca185cf5a1
Tree-SHA512: e51c32f3072c506b0029a001d8b108125e1acb4f2b6a48a6be721ddadda9da0ae77a9b39ff33f9d9eebabe2244c1db09e8502e3e7012d7a5d40d98e96da0dc44
31cf68a3ad [util] add RunCommandParseJSON (Sjors Provoost)
c17f54ee53 [ci] use boost::process (Sjors Provoost)
32128ba682 [doc] include Doxygen comments for HAVE_BOOST_PROCESS (Sjors Provoost)
3c84d85f7d [build] msvc: add boost::process (Sjors Provoost)
c47e4bbf0b [build] make boost-process opt-in (Sjors Provoost)
929cda5470 configure: add ax_boost_process (Sjors Provoost)
8314c23d7b [depends] boost: patch unused variable in boost_process (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Prerequisite for external signer support in #16546. Big picture overview in [this gist](https://gist.github.com/Sjors/29d06728c685e6182828c1ce9b74483d).
This adds a new dependency [boost process](https://github.com/boostorg/process/tree/boost-1.64.0). This is part of Boost since 1.64 which is part of `depends`. Because the minimum Boost version is 1.47, this functionality is skipped for older versions of Boost.
Use `./configure --with-boost-process` to opt in, which checks for the presence of Boost::Process.
We add `UniValue runCommandParseJSON(const std::string& strCommand)` to `system.{h,cpp}` which calls an arbitrary command and processes the JSON returned by it. This is currently only called by the test suite.
~For testing purposes this adds a new regtest-only RPC method `runcommand`, as well as `test/mocks/command.py` used by functional tests.~ (this is no longer the case)
TODO:
- [ ] review boost process in #15440
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 31cf68a3ad
hebasto:
re-ACK 31cf68a3ad, only rebased (verified with `git range-diff`) and removed an unintentional tab character since the [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15382#pullrequestreview-458371035) review.
meshcollider:
Very light utACK 31cf68a3ad, although I am not very confident with build stuff.
promag:
Code review ACK 31cf68a3ad, don't mind the nit.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 31cf68a3ad. I left some comments below that could be ignored or followed up later. The current change is clean and comprehensive.
Tree-SHA512: c506e747014b263606e1f538ed4624a8ad7bcf4e025cb700c12cc5739964e254dc04a2bbb848996b170e2ccec3fbfa4fe9e2b3976b191222cfb82fc3e6ab182d
