724c497562 [fuzz] Add ConsumeAsmap() function (John Newbery)
5840476714 [addrman] Make m_asmap private (John Newbery)
f9002cb5db [net] Rename the copyStats arg from m_asmap to asmap (John Newbery)
f572f2b204 [addrman] Set m_asmap in CAddrMan initializer list (John Newbery)
593247872d [net] Remove CConnMan::SetAsmap() (John Newbery)
50fd77045e [init] Read/decode asmap before constructing addrman (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Commit 181a1207 introduced an initialization order bug: CAddrMan's m_asmap must be set before deserializing peers.dat.
The first commit restores the correct initialization order. The remaining commits make `CAddrMan::m_asmap` usage safer:
- don't reach into `CAddrMan`'s internal data from `CConnMan`
- set `m_asmap` in the initializer list and make it const
- make `m_asmap` private, and access it (as a reference to const) from a getter.
This ensures that peers.dat deserialization must happen after setting m_asmap, since m_asmap is set during CAddrMan construction.
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
Tested ACK 724c497562
amitiuttarwar:
code review but utACK 724c497562
naumenkogs:
utACK 724c497562
vasild:
ACK 724c497562
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 724c497562👫
Tree-SHA512: 684a4cf9e3d4496c9997fb2bc4ec874809987055c157ec3fad1d2143b8223df52b5a0af787d028930b27388c8efeba0aeb2446cb35c337a5552ae76112ade726
The m_ prefix indicates that a variable is a data member. Using it as
a parameter name is misleading.
Also update the name of the function from copyStats to CopyStats to
comply with our style guide.
This logic is a no-op since it was introduced in commit
f9f5cfc506.
m_addr_name is never initialized to the empty string, because
ToStringIPPort never returns an empty string.
5730a43703 test: Add functional test for AddrFetch connections (Martin Zumsande)
c34ad3309f net, rpc: Enable AddrFetch connections for functional testing (Martin Zumsande)
533500d907 p2p: Add timeout for AddrFetch peers (Martin Zumsande)
b6c5d1e450 p2p: AddrFetch - don't disconnect on self-announcements (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
AddrFetch connections (old name: oneshots) are intended to be short-lived connections on which we ask a peer for addresses via `getaddr` and disconnect after receiving them.
This is done by disconnecting after receiving the first `addr`. However, it is no longer working as intended, because nowadays, the first `addr` a typical bitcoin core node sends is its self-announcement.
So we'll disconnect before the peer gets a chance to answer our `getaddr`.
I checked that this affects both `-seednode` peers specified manually, and DNS seeds when AddrFetch is used as a fallback if DNS doesn't work for us.
The current behavior of getting peers via AddrFetch when starting with an empty addrman would be to connect to the peer, receive its self-announcement and add it to addrman, disconnect, reconnect to the same peer again as a full outbound (no other addresses in addrman) and then receive more `addr`. This is silly and not in line with AddrFetch peer being intended to be short-lived peers.
Fix this by only disconnecting after receiving an `addr` message of size > 1.
[Edit] As per review discussion, this PR now also adds a timeout after which we disconnect if we haven't received any suitable `addr`, and a functional test.
ACKs for top commit:
amitiuttarwar:
reACK 5730a43703
naumenkogs:
ACK 5730a43703
jnewbery:
ACK 5730a43703
Tree-SHA512: 8a81234f37e827705138eb254223f7f3b3bf44a06cb02126fc7990b0d231b9bd8f07d38d185cc30d55bf35548a6fdc286b69602498d875b937e7c58332158bf9
b1d905c225 p2p: earlier continuation when no remaining eviction candidates (Vasil Dimov)
c9e8d8f9b1 p2p: process more candidates per protection iteration (Jon Atack)
02e411ec45 p2p: iterate eviction protection only on networks having candidates (Jon Atack)
5adb064574 bench: add peer eviction protection benchmarks (Jon Atack)
566357f8f7 refactor: move GetRandomNodeEvictionCandidates() to test utilities (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This follow-up to #21261 improves `ProtectEvictionCandidatesByRatio()` for better performance.
Benchmarks are added; the performance improvement is between 2x and 5x for the benchmarked cases (CPU 2.50GHz, Turbo off, performance mode, Debian Clang 11 non-debug build).
```
$ ./src/bench/bench_bitcoin -filter="EvictionProtection*.*"
```
The refactored code is well-covered by existing unit tests and also a fuzzer.
- `$ ./src/test/test_bitcoin -t net_peer_eviction_tests`
- `$ FUZZ=node_eviction ./src/test/fuzz/fuzz ../qa-assets/fuzz_seed_corpus/node_eviction`
ACKs for top commit:
klementtan:
Tested and code review ACK b1d905c2.
vasild:
ACK b1d905c225
jarolrod:
ACK b1d905c225
Tree-SHA512: a3a6607b9ea2fec138da9780c03f63e177b6712091c5a3ddc3804b896a7585216446310280791f5e20cc023d02d2f03a4139237e12b5c1d7f2a1fa1011610e96
4101ec9d2e doc: mention that we enforce port=0 in I2P (Vasil Dimov)
e0a2b390c1 addrman: reset I2P ports to 0 when loading from disk (Vasil Dimov)
41cda9d075 test: ensure I2P ports are handled as expected (Vasil Dimov)
4f432bd738 net: do not connect to I2P hosts on port!=0 (Vasil Dimov)
1f096f091e net: distinguish default port per network (Vasil Dimov)
aeac3bce3e net: change I2P seeds' ports to 0 (Vasil Dimov)
38f900290c net: change assumed I2P port to 0 (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
_This is an alternative to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21514, inspired by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21514#issuecomment-815049933. They are mutually exclusive. Just one of them should be merged._
Change assumed ports for I2P to 0 (instead of the default 8333) as this is closer to what actually happens underneath with SAM 3.1 (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21514#issuecomment-812632520, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21514#issuecomment-816564719).
Don't connect to I2P peers with advertised port != 0 (we don't specify a port to our SAM 3.1 proxy and it always connects to port = 0).
Note, this change:
* Keeps I2P addresses with port != 0 in addrman and relays them to others via P2P gossip. There may be non-bitcoin-core-22.0 peers using SAM 3.2 and for them such addresses may be useful.
* Silently refuses to connect to I2P hosts with port != 0. This is ok for automatically chosen peers from addrman. Not so ok for peers provided via `-addnode` or `-connect` - a user who specifies `foo.b32.i2p:1234` (non zero port) may wonder why "nothing is happening".
Fixes#21389
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 4101ec9d2e
jonatack:
re-ACK 4101ec9d2e per `git range-diff efff9c3 0b0ee03 4101ec9`, built with DDEBUG_ADDRMAN, did fairly extensive testing on mainnet both with and without a peers.dat / -dnsseeds=0 to test boostrapping.
Tree-SHA512: 0e3c019e1dc05e54f559275859d3450e0c735596d179e30b66811aad9d5b5fabe3dcc44571e8f7b99f9fe16453eee393d6e153454dd873b9ff14907d4e6354fe
2feec3ce31 net: don't bind on 0.0.0.0 if binds are restricted to Tor (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
The semantic of `-bind` is to restrict the binding only to some address.
If not specified, then the user does not care and we bind to `0.0.0.0`.
If specified then we should honor the restriction and bind only to the
specified address.
Before this change, if no `-bind` is given then we would bind to
`0.0.0.0:8333` and to `127.0.0.1:8334` (incoming Tor) which is ok -
the user does not care to restrict the binding.
However, if only `-bind=addr:port=onion` is given (without ordinary
`-bind=`) then we would bind to `addr:port` _and_ to `0.0.0.0:8333` in
addition.
Change the above to not do the additional bind: if only
`-bind=addr:port=onion` is given (without ordinary `-bind=`) then bind
to `addr:port` (only) and consider incoming connections to that as Tor
and do not advertise it. I.e. a Tor-only node.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 2feec3ce31
jonatack:
utACK 2feec3ce31 per `git diff a004833 2feec3c`
hebasto:
ACK 2feec3ce31, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64):
Tree-SHA512: a04483af601706da928958b92dc560f9cfcc78ab0bb9d74414636eed1c6f29ed538ce1fb5a17d41ed82c9c9a45ca94899d0966e7ef93da809c9bcdcdb1d1f040
in ProtectEvictionCandidatesByRatio().
With this change, `if (n.count == 0) continue;` will be true
if a network had candidates protected in the first iterations
and has no candidates remaining to be protected in later iterations.
Co-authored-by: Jon Atack <jon@atack.com>
for the usual case when some of the protected networks
don't have eviction candidates, to reduce the number
of iterations in ProtectEvictionCandidatesByRatio().
Picks up an idea in ef411cd2 that I had dropped.
in ProtectEvictionCandidatesByRatio().
Thank you to Vasil Dimov, whose suggestions during a post-merge
discussion about PR 21261 reminded me that I had done this in
earlier versions of the PR, e.g. commits like ef411cd2.
Co-authored-by: Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org>
The semantic of `-bind` is to restrict the binding only to some address.
If not specified, then the user does not care and we bind to `0.0.0.0`.
If specified then we should honor the restriction and bind only to the
specified address.
Before this change, if no `-bind` is given then we would bind to
`0.0.0.0:8333` and to `127.0.0.1:8334` (incoming Tor) which is ok -
the user does not care to restrict the binding.
However, if only `-bind=addr:port=onion` is given (without ordinary
`-bind=`) then we would bind to `addr:port` _and_ to `0.0.0.0:8333` in
addition.
Change the above to not do the additional bind: if only
`-bind=addr:port=onion` is given (without ordinary `-bind=`) then bind
to `addr:port` (only) and consider incoming connections to that as Tor
and do not advertise it. I.e. a Tor-only node.
79c02c88b3 Randomize message processing peer order (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Right now, the message handling loop iterates the list of nodes always in the same order: the order they were connected in (see the `vNodes` vector). For some parts of the net processing logic, this order matters. Transaction requests are assigned explicitly to peers since #19988, but many other parts of processing work on a "first-served-by-loop-first" basis, such as block downloading. If peers can predict this ordering, it may be exploited to cause delays.
As there isn't anything particularly optimal about the current ordering, just make it unpredictable by randomizing.
Reported by Crypt-iQ.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK 79c02c88b3
Crypt-iQ:
ACK 79c02c88b3
sdaftuar:
utACK 79c02c88b3
achow101:
Code Review ACK 79c02c88b3
jamesob:
crACK 79c02c88b3
jonatack:
ACK 79c02c88b3
vasild:
ACK 79c02c88b3
theStack:
ACK 79c02c88b3
Tree-SHA512: 9a87c4dcad47c2d61b76c4f37f59674876b78f33f45943089bf159902a23e12de7a5feae1a73b17cbc3f2e37c980ecf0f7fd86af9e6fa3a68099537a3c82c106
This commit extends our inbound eviction protection to I2P peers to
favorise the diversity of peer connections, as peers connected
through the I2P network are otherwise disadvantaged by our eviction
criteria for their higher latency (higher min ping times) relative
to IPv4 and IPv6 peers, as well as relative to Tor onion peers.
The `networks` array is order-dependent in the case of a tie in
candidate counts between networks (earlier array members receive
priority in the case of a tie).
Therefore, we place I2P candidates before localhost and onion ones
in terms of opportunity to recover unused remaining protected slots
from the previous iteration, guesstimating that most nodes allowing
both onion and I2P inbounds will have more onion peers, followed by
localhost, then I2P, as I2P support is only being added in the
upcoming v22.0 release.
with a more abstract framework to allow easily extending inbound
eviction protection to peers connected through new higher-latency
networks that are disadvantaged by our inbound eviction criteria,
such as I2P and perhaps other BIP155 networks in the future like
CJDNS. This is a change in behavior.
The algorithm is a basically a multi-pass knapsack:
- Count the number of eviction candidates in each of the disadvantaged
privacy networks.
- Sort the networks from lower to higher candidate counts, so that
a network with fewer candidates will have the first opportunity
for any unused slots remaining from the previous iteration. In
the case of a tie in candidate counts, priority is given by array
member order from first to last, guesstimated to favor more unusual
networks.
- Iterate through the networks in this order. On each iteration,
allocate each network an equal number of protected slots targeting
a total number of candidates to protect, provided any slots remain
in the knapsack.
- Protect the candidates in that network having the longest uptime,
if any in that network are present.
- Continue iterating as long as we have non-allocated slots
remaining and candidates available to protect.
Localhost peers are treated as a network like Tor or I2P by aliasing
them to an unused Network enumerator: Network::NET_MAX.
The goal is to favorise diversity of our inbound connections.
Credit to Vasil Dimov for improving the algorithm from single-pass
to multi-pass to better allocate unused protection slots.
Co-authored-by: Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org>
as EraseLastKElements() called in the next line performs the same operation.
Thanks to Martin Zumsande (lightlike) for seeing this while reviewing.
Co-authored-by: Martin Zumsande <mzumsande@gmail.com>
ffff0d0442 refactor: Switch serialize to uint8_t (1/n) (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Replace `char` -> `uint8_t` in serialization where a sign doesn't make sense (char might be signed/unsigned).
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK ffff0d0442: patch looks correct and commit hash is ffffresh (was bbbbadass)
kristapsk:
ACK ffff0d0442
Tree-SHA512: cda682280c21d37cc3a6abd62569732079b31d18df3f157aa28bed80bd6f9f29a7db5c133b1f57b3a8f8d5ba181a76e473763c6e26a2df6d9244813f56f893ee
fe3d17df04 net: ignore block-relay-only peers when skipping DNS seed (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
Since #17428 bitcoind will attempt to reconnect to two block-relay-only anchors before doing any other outbound connections. When determining whether to use DNS seeds, it will currently see these two peers and decide "we're connected to the p2p network, so no need to lookup DNS" -- but block-relay-only peers don't do address relay, so if your address book is full of invalid addresses (apart from your anchors) this behaviour will prevent you from recovering from that situation.
This patch changes it so that it only skips use of DNS seeds when there are two full-outbound peers, not just block-relay-only peers.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
utACK fe3d17d
amitiuttarwar:
ACK fe3d17df04, this impacts the very common case where we stop/start a node, persisting anchors & have a non-empty addrman (although, to be clear, wouldn't be particularly problematic in the common cases where the addrman has valid addresses)
mzumsande:
ACK fe3d17df04
jonatack:
ACK fe3d17df04
prayank23:
tACK fe3d17df04
Tree-SHA512: 9814b0d84321d7f45b5013eb40c420a0dd93bf9430f5ef12dce50d1912a18d5de2070d890a8c6fe737a3329b31059b823bc660b432d5ba21f02881dc1d951e94
0829516d1f [refactor] Remove unused ForEachNodeThen() template (John Newbery)
09cc66c00e scripted-diff: rename address relay fields (John Newbery)
76568a3351 [net processing] Move addr relay data and logic into net processing (John Newbery)
caba7ae8a5 [net processing] Make RelayAddress() a member function of PeerManagerImpl (John Newbery)
86acc96469 [net processing] Take NodeId instead of CNode* as originator for RelayAddress() (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
This continues the work of moving application layer data into net_processing, by moving all addr data into the new Peer object added in #19607.
For motivation, see #19398.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 0829516d1f
mzumsande:
ACK 0829516d1f, reviewed the code and ran tests.
sipa:
utACK 0829516d1f
hebasto:
re-ACK 0829516d1f
Tree-SHA512: efe0410fac288637f203eb37d1999910791e345872d37e1bd5cde50e25bb3cb1c369ab86b3a166ffd5e06ee72e4508aa2c46d658be6a54e20b4f220d2f57d0a6
7075f604e8 scripted-diff: update noban documentation in net_processing.cpp (Jon Atack)
a95540cf43 scripted-diff: rename NetPermissionFlags enumerators (Jon Atack)
810d0929c1 p2p, refactor: make NetPermissionFlags a uint32 enum class (Jon Atack)
7b55a94497 p2p: NetPermissions::HasFlag() pass flags param by value (Jon Atack)
91f6e6e6d1 scripted-diff: add NetPermissionFlags scopes where not already present (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
While reviewing #20196, I noticed the `NetPermissionFlags` enums are frequently called as if they were scoped, yet are still global. This patch upgrades `NetPermissionFlags` to a scoped class enum and updates the enumerator naming, similarly to #19771. See https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#enum-enumerations for more info.
This change would eliminate the class of bugs like https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20196#discussion_r610770148 and #21644, as only defined operations on the flags would compile.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 7075f604e8
vasild:
ACK 7075f604e8
Tree-SHA512: 7fcea66ee499f059efc78c934b5f729b3c8573fe304dee2c27c837c2f662b89324790568246d75b2a574cf9f059b42d3551d928996862f4358055eb43521e6f4
105941b726 net: use stronger AddLocal() for our I2P address (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
There are two issues:
### 1. Our I2P address not added to local addresses.
* `externalip=` is used with an IPv4 address (this sets automatically `discover=0`)
* No `discover=1` is used
* `i2psam=` is used
* No `externalip=` is used for our I2P address
* `listenonion=1 torcontrol=` are used
In this case `AddLocal(LOCAL_MANUAL)` [is used](94f83534e4/src/torcontrol.cpp (L354)) for our `.onion` address and `AddLocal(LOCAL_BIND)` [for our](94f83534e4/src/net.cpp (L2247)) `.b32.i2p` address, the latter being [ignored](94f83534e4/src/net.cpp (L232-L233)) due to `discover=0`.
### 2. Our I2P address removed from local addresses even if specified with `externalip=` on I2P proxy restart.
* `externalip=` is used with our I2P address (this sets automatically `discover=0`)
* No `discover=1` is used
* `i2psam=` is used
In this case, initially `externalip=` causes our I2P address to be [added](94f83534e4/src/init.cpp (L1266)) with `AddLocal(LOCAL_MANUAL)` which overrides `discover=0` and works as expected. However, if later the I2P proxy is shut down [we do](94f83534e4/src/net.cpp (L2234)) `RemoveLocal()` in order to stop advertising our I2P address (since we have lost I2P connectivity). When the I2P proxy is started and we reconnect to it, restoring the I2P connectivity, [we do](94f83534e4/src/net.cpp (L2247)) `AddLocal(LOCAL_BIND)` which does nothing due to `discover=0`.
To resolve those two issues, use `AddLocal(LOCAL_MANUAL)` for I2P which is also what we do with Tor.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 105941b726
Tree-SHA512: 0c9daf6116b8d9c34ad7e6e9bbff6e8106e94e4394a815d7ae19287aea22a8c7c4e093c8dd8c58a4a1b1412b2575a9b42b8a93672c8d17f11c24508c534506c7
- drop redundant PF_ permission flags prefixes
- drop ALL_CAPS naming per https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#Renum-caps
- rename IsImplicit to Implicit
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
s() { git grep -l "$1" src | xargs sed -i "s/$1/$2/g"; }
s 'PF_NONE' 'None'
s 'PF_BLOOMFILTER' 'BloomFilter'
s 'PF_RELAY' 'Relay'
s 'PF_FORCERELAY' 'ForceRelay'
s 'PF_DOWNLOAD' 'Download'
s 'PF_NOBAN' 'NoBan'
s 'PF_MEMPOOL' 'Mempool'
s 'PF_ADDR' 'Addr'
s 'PF_ISIMPLICIT' 'Implicit'
s 'PF_ALL' 'All'
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
s() { git grep -l "$1" -- 'src' ':!src/net_permissions.h' | xargs sed -i -E "s/([^:])$1/\1NetPermissionFlags::$1/"; }
s 'PF_NONE'
s 'PF_BLOOMFILTER'
s 'PF_RELAY'
s 'PF_FORCERELAY'
s 'PF_DOWNLOAD'
s 'PF_NOBAN'
s 'PF_MEMPOOL'
s 'PF_ADDR'
s 'PF_ISIMPLICIT'
s 'PF_ALL'
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
Co-authored-by: Hennadii Stepanov <32963518+hebasto@users.noreply.github.com>
792be53d3e refactor: Replace std::bind with lambdas (Hennadii Stepanov)
a508f718f3 refactor: Use appropriate thread constructor (Hennadii Stepanov)
30e4448215 refactor: Make TraceThread a non-template free function (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR does not change behavior.
Its goal is to improve readability and maintainability of the code.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK 792be53d3e
jonatack:
tACK 792be53d3e
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 792be53d3e
Tree-SHA512: a03142f04f370f6bc02bd3ddfa870819b51740fcd028772241d68c84087f95a2d78207cbd5edb3f7c636fcf2d76192d9c59873f8f0af451d3b05c0cf9cf234df
36fb036d25 p2p: allow NetPermissions::ClearFlag() only with PF_ISIMPLICIT (Jon Atack)
4e0d5788ba test: add net permissions noban/download unit test coverage (Jon Atack)
dde69f20a0 p2p, bugfix: use NetPermissions::HasFlag() in CConnman::Bind() (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This is a bugfix follow-up to #16248 and #19191 that was noticed in #21506. Both v0.21 and master are affected.
Since #19191, noban is a multi-flag that implies download, so the conditional in `CConnman::Bind()` using a bitwise AND on noban will return the same result for both the noban status and the download status. This means that download peers are incorrectly not being added to local addresses because they are mistakenly seen as noban peers.
The second commit adds unit test coverage to illustrate and test the noban/download relationship and the `NetPermissions` operations involving them.
The final commit adds documentation and disallows calling `NetPermissions::ClearFlag()` with any second param other than `NetPermissionFlags` "implicit" -- per current usage in the codebase -- because `ClearFlag()` should not be called with any second param that is a subflag of a multiflag, e.g. "relay" or "download," as that would leave the result in an invalid state corresponding to none of the existing NetPermissionFlags. Thanks to Vasil Dimov for noticing this.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
re-ACK 36fb036d25☕
vasild:
ACK 36fb036d25
hebasto:
ACK 36fb036d25, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
kallewoof:
Code review ACK 36fb036d25
Tree-SHA512: 5fbc7ddbf31d06b35bf238f4d77ef311e6b6ef2e1bb9893f32f889c1a0f65774a3710dcb21d94317fe6166df9334a9f2d42630809e7fe8cbd797dd6f6fc49491
There are two issues:
1. Our I2P address not added to local addresses.
* `externalip=` is used with an IPv4 address (this sets automatically
`discover=0`)
* No `discover=1` is used
* `i2psam=` is used
* No `externalip=` is used for our I2P address
* `listenonion=1 torcontrol=` are used
In this case `AddLocal(LOCAL_MANUAL)` is used for our `.onion` address
and `AddLocal(LOCAL_BIND)` for our `.b32.i2p` address, the latter being
ignored due to `discover=0`.
2. Our I2P address removed from local addresses even if specified
with `externalip=` on I2P proxy restart.
* `externalip=` is used with our I2P address (this sets automatically
`discover=0`)
* No `discover=1` is used
* `i2psam=` is used
In this case, initially `externalip=` causes our I2P address to be added
with `AddLocal(LOCAL_MANUAL)` which overrides `discover=0` and works as
expected. However, if later the I2P proxy is shut down we do
`RemoveLocal()` in order to stop advertising our I2P address (since we
have lost I2P connectivity). When the I2P proxy is started and we
reconnect to it, restoring the I2P connectivity, we do
`AddLocal(LOCAL_BIND)` which does nothing due to `discover=0`.
To resolve those two issues, use `AddLocal(LOCAL_MANUAL)` for I2P which
is also what we do with Tor.
d66f283ac0 scripted-diff: Replace three dots with ellipsis in the UI strings (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR is split from #21463.
The change was suggested on [Transifex.com](https://www.transifex.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/), and it does not touch `LogPrint` and `LogPrintf` calls.
The only comment on #21463 [was](9030e4b5a6 (r597220100)):
> Mind that these messages also end up in the log. In principle the log is already UTF-8 (as are all strings and text in bitcoind). But, just noting, that it might make browsing the log a less pleasant experience on systems with misconfigured locale like some BSDs by default.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK d66f283ac0
Tree-SHA512: 5ab1cb3160f3f996f1ad7d7486662da3eb7f06a857f4a1874963ce10caed5b86b0ad6151b1b9ebeb2b8aa5f0c85efad3b768ea9cafe5db86f78f88912b756d1e
