7a799c9c2b index: refactor-only: Reuse CChain ref (Carl Dong)
db33cde80f index: Add chainstate member to BaseIndex (Carl Dong)
f4a47a1feb bench: Use existing chainman in AssembleBlock (Carl Dong)
91226eb917 bench: Use existing NodeContext in DuplicateInputs (Carl Dong)
e6b4aa6eb5 miner: Pass in chainman to RegenerateCommitments (Carl Dong)
9ecade1425 rest: Add GetChainman function and use it (Carl Dong)
fc1c282845 rpc/blockchain: Use existing blockman in gettxoutsetinfo (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
Overall PR: #20158 (tree-wide: De-globalize ChainstateManager)
The first 2 commits are fixups addressing review for the last bundle: #21391
NEW note:
1. I have opened #21766 which keeps track of potential improvements where the flaws already existed before the de-globalization work, please post on that issue about these improvements, thanks!
Note to reviewers:
1. This bundle may _apparently_ introduce usage of `g_chainman` or `::Chain(state|)Active()` globals, but these are resolved later on in the overall PR. [Commits of overall PR](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20158/commits)
2. There may be seemingly obvious local references to `ChainstateManager` or other validation objects which are not being used in callers of the current function in question, this is done intentionally to **_keep each commit centered around one function/method_** to ease review and to make the overall change systematic. We don't assume anything about our callers. Rest assured that once we are considering that particular caller in later commits, we will use the obvious local references. [Commits of overall PR](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20158/commits)
3. When changing a function/method that has many callers (e.g. `LookupBlockIndex` with 55 callers), it is sometimes easier (and less error-prone) to use a scripted-diff. When doing so, there will be 3 commits in sequence so that every commit compiles like so:
1. Add `new_function`, make `old_function` a wrapper of `new_function`, divert all calls to `old_function` to `new_function` **in the local module only**
2. Scripted-diff to divert all calls to `old_function` to `new_function` **in the rest of the codebase**
3. Remove `old_function`
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
ACK 7a799c9
ariard:
Code Review ACK 7a799c9
fjahr:
re-ACK 7a799c9c2b
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 7a799c9c2b🌠
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 7a799c9c2b. Basically no change since last review except fixed rebase conflicts and a new comment about REST Ensure()
jamesob:
conditional ACK 7a799c9c2b ([`jamesob/ackr/21767.1.dongcarl.bundle_6_n_prune_g_chai`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/21767.1.dongcarl.bundle_6_n_prune_g_chai))
Tree-SHA512: 531c00ddcb318817457db2812d9a9d930bc664e58e6f7f1c746350732b031dd624270bfa6b9f49d8056aeb6321d973f0e38e4ff914acd6768edd8602c017d10e
ffff0d0442 refactor: Switch serialize to uint8_t (1/n) (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Replace `char` -> `uint8_t` in serialization where a sign doesn't make sense (char might be signed/unsigned).
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK ffff0d0442: patch looks correct and commit hash is ffffresh (was bbbbadass)
kristapsk:
ACK ffff0d0442
Tree-SHA512: cda682280c21d37cc3a6abd62569732079b31d18df3f157aa28bed80bd6f9f29a7db5c133b1f57b3a8f8d5ba181a76e473763c6e26a2df6d9244813f56f893ee
feb72e5432 scripted-diff: rename GetSystemTimeInSeconds to GetTimeSeconds (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This PR simply renames `GetSystemTimeInSeconds` to `GetTimeSeconds`, for uniformity amongst our time handling functions (`GetTimeMillis`, `GetTimeMicros`). I have a branch that does a chunk of `GetTime()` -> `GetSystemTimeInSeconds` (`GetTimeSeconds`) / `GetTime<T>` migration, so we can eventually remove the (2 year) deprecated `GetTime()`.
However, splitting this off and doing the renaming first while the number of `GetSystemTimeInSeconds` instances is small seems worthwhile.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK feb72e5432: patch looks correct
promag:
Code review ACK feb72e5432.
Tree-SHA512: e2ac30be9cbcd77b70c9f74bef820b558945d0fcc6f3dc59fde68a18d08a7d36f42088b804ffe7c03478c8db048615b4c4aa65a3d8d9f5d717d59b58c99f1c54
38eb37c0bd qt, rpc: Do not accept command while executing another one (Hennadii Stepanov)
0c32b9c527 qt, rpc: Accept stop RPC even another command is executing (Hennadii Stepanov)
ccf790287c qt, rpc, refactor: Return early in RPCConsole::on_lineEdit_returnPressed (Hennadii Stepanov)
5b9c8c9cdd qt, rpc: Add "Executing…" message (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
On master (3f512f3d56) it is possible to enter another command while the current command is still being executed. That makes a mess in the output.
With this PR:
Some previous context: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/59#issuecomment-715275185
---
It is still possible to enter and execute the `stop` command any time.
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
ACK 38eb37c
promag:
Tested ACK 38eb37c0bd.
Tree-SHA512: 2b37a4b6838bf586b1b5c878192106721f713caeb6252514a6540356aab898986396e0777e73891d331b1be797a4926c20d3f9f38ba2c984ea90d55b0c34f664
0f3d955a38 qt: Make RPC console welcome message translation-friendly (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
The best practice is do not split a translatable multi-line message into single lines. This helps translators to follow the context.
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
re-ACK 0f3d955a38
Tree-SHA512: 30911ff3a972a7787804bb8b27d0b77bfff15939bb478c199261866bfb55d9acd12ab4d44b8b9fc1d4898222cabc4007cc897f9b65728924d121f31e914c44ac
9999e4c64b doc: Fix external links (IRC, ...) (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The freenode channel was deleted by their staff. Fix that by moving to libera chat.
Also includes minor cosmetic fixups 🐷💅
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK 9999e4c64b, agree with the recent changes.
kristapsk:
re-ACK 9999e4c64b
theStack:
ACK 9999e4c64b
jarolrod:
ACK 9999e4c64b
Tree-SHA512: 67886783b1239153ac1631f6594fc2f873760da3c63aca400c0a84f852418d0e28de0400310f4d8b8fe213b7d4d243600607acc4a48c1662f9848f254c946cab
d29ea72393 gui: Add access to the Peers tab from the network icon (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR add a small context menu to the network activity icon that provides an access to the Peers tab:
Closes#93.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-ACK d29ea72393
kristapsk:
re-ACK d29ea72393
promag:
Code review ACK d29ea72393.
Tree-SHA512: dd871415fe514a19c6a22100d58f31954d9e55b80585d5a3f26e17a8d51dadf912441786fc0d23beabd812f1b501658fec1dbe345cd41beae5832a8eda890f77
bfa9309ad6 Use COINBASE_MATURITY constant in functional tests. (Kiminuo)
525448df9d Move COINBASE_MATURITY from `feature_nulldummy` test to `blocktools`. (Kiminuo)
Pull request description:
`COINBASE_MATURITY` constant was added to `feature_nulldummy` test in #21373. This PR moves the constant to `blocktools.py` file and uses the constant in more tests as suggested [here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21373#discussion_r605418462).
Edit: Goal of this PR is to replace integer constants with `COINBASE_MATURITY` but not necessarily in *all* cases because that would mean to read and fully understand all tests. That's out of my time constraints. Any reports where `COINBASE_MATURITY` should be used are welcome though!
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
ACK bfa9309ad6🌇
Tree-SHA512: 01f04645f05a39028681f355cf3d42dd63ea3303f76d93c430e0fdce441934358a2d847a54e6068d61932f1b75e1d406f51859b057b3e4b569f7083915cb317f
2be3572506 test: Fix IPv6 check on BSD systems (nthumann)
Pull request description:
I noticed that `test_ipv6_local()` always returns `False` on macOS or FreeBSD, even though IPv6 is working perfectly fine. This causes `test/functional/rpc_bind.py --ipv6` and `test/functional/feature_proxy.py` to skip their run.
Apparently, there's a check if the port number is `0` (see [here](64881da478/sys/netinet6/udp6_usrreq.c (L248)) or [here](8f02f2a044/bsd/netinet6/udp6_usrreq.c (L282))), while Linux has no problem with this.
This is fixed by specifying any other port number than `0`, e.g. `1`. Still, because of `SOCK_DGRAM`, no actual connection is made.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 2be3572506 - nice improvement. I checked that with this change ipv6 related tests in `feature_proxy.py` are being run.
theStack:
ACK 2be3572506
Tree-SHA512: 8417c2d3cf71050529f3fa409a03872040fe5d249eae4172f276e62156e505a20d375b963712a186c9ad7967d8a497b5900d327c74a9693f68c33063871d4691
3caedb4c03 build: don't use cf-protection when targeting arm-apple-darwin (fanquake)
Pull request description:
After two reports on IRC of issues building depends on an Apple M1 machine, this option (obviously) can't be used when targeting `arm-apple-darwin`. For now, just use it for `x86_64-apple-darwin`.
```bash
Apple clang version 12.0.5 (clang-1205.0.22.9)
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin20.4.0
error: option 'cf-protection=return' cannot be specified on this target
error: option 'cf-protection=branch' cannot be specified on this target
2 errors generated.
```
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Tested ACK 3caedb4c03.
Tree-SHA512: 8763a5b94000016b0c2f0438e66002fdfcd2cbafd9d2d2acc1972f0c6f707e820186711dbd9d3f72673c179718da75588acb4732f8d84b85f0c1dfc862b6e944
c7bd5842e4 MOVEONLY: CWallet transaction code out of wallet.cpp/.h (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This commit just moves function without making any changes. It can be reviewed with `git log -p -n1 --color-moved=dimmed_zebra`
Motivation for this change is to make `wallet.cpp/h` less monolithic and start to make wallet transaction state tracking comprehensible so bugs in https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-devwiki/wiki/Wallet-Transaction-Conflict-Tracking can be fixed safely without introducing new problems.
This moves wallet classes and methods that deal with transactions out of `wallet.cpp/.h` into better organized files:
- `transaction.cpp/.h` - CWalletTx and CMerkleTx class definitions
- `receive.cpp/.h` - functions checking received transactions and computing balances
- `spend.cpp/.h` - functions creating transactions and finding spendable coins
After #20773, when loading is separated from syncing it will also be possible to move more `wallet.cpp/.h` functions to:
- `sync.cpp/.h` - functions handling chain notifications and rescanning
This commit arranges `receive.cpp` and `spend.cpp` functions in dependency order so it's possible to skim `receive.cpp` and get an idea of how computing balances works, and skim `spend.cpp` and get an idea of how transactions are created, without having to jump all over `wallet.cpp` where functions are not in order and there is a lot of unrelated code.
Followup commit "refactor: Detach wallet transaction methods" in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21206 follows up this PR and tweaks function names and arguments to reflect new locations. The two commits are split into separate PRs because this commit is more work to maintain and less work to review, while the other commit is less work to maintain and more work to review, so hopefully this commit can be merged earlier.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-utACK c7bd5842e4
fjahr:
utACK c7bd5842e4
promag:
Code review ACK c7bd5842e4, verified move only claim.
meshcollider:
Dimmed-zebra-check and functional test run ACK c7bd5842e4
Tree-SHA512: 4981de6911cb1196774db375494355cc9af59b52456129c002d264a77cd9ed6175f8ecbb6b2f492a59a4d5a0def21a39d96fa79c9f4d99be0992985f553be32f
4935ac583b qt: Improve GUI responsiveness (Hennadii Stepanov)
75850106ae qt, macos: Fix GUIUtil::PolishProgressDialog bug (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
[`QProgressDialog`](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qprogressdialog.html) estimates the time the operation will take (based on time for steps), and only shows itself if that estimate is beyond [`minimumDuration`](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qprogressdialog.html#minimumDuration-prop).
The default `minimumDuration` value is [4 seconds](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qprogressdialog.html#details), and it could make users think that the GUI is frozen.
This PR sets `minimumDuration` to zero for all progress dialogs, that affects ones in the `WalletControllerActivity` class.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 4935ac583b. I'm not very familiar with this API but all the changes and explanations make sense and are very clear, and this seems like it should be an improvement.
promag:
Code review ACK 4935ac583b.
jarolrod:
ACK 4935ac583b
Tree-SHA512: 2ddd74e7fd87894d341d2439dbaa544d031a350f7f57d4c7e9fbba977dc24080fe60fd7a80a542b1647f1de9091d7fd04a36eab695088d4d75fb836548e99b5f
Introduce the maxuploadtarget option to the example bitcoin.conf file. This adds visibility for this option which is useful to those looking to configure bandwidth usage.
c231254a65 qt: Make TransactionView aware of runtime palette change (Hennadii Stepanov)
2b622d4ace qt: Make CoinControlDialog aware of runtime palette change (Hennadii Stepanov)
97a6b5e06a qt: Make OverviewPage aware of runtime palette change (Hennadii Stepanov)
d05f1b278d qt: Make UnitDisplayStatusBarControl aware of runtime palette change (Hennadii Stepanov)
6b2ce65392 qt: Replace base class of ClickableLabel with ThemedLabel (Hennadii Stepanov)
ff530a2093 qt: Use GUIUtil::ThemedLabel class (Hennadii Stepanov)
d99ef327a8 qt: Add GUIUtil::ThemedLabel class (Hennadii Stepanov)
c054720e08 qt: Make SignVerifyMessageDialog aware of runtime palette change (Hennadii Stepanov)
0dcc3fac43 qt: Make SendCoinsEntry aware of runtime palette change (Hennadii Stepanov)
fa18d28e12 qt: Make RPCConsole aware of runtime palette change (Hennadii Stepanov)
f1083826e3 qt: Make BitcoinGUI aware of runtime palette change (Hennadii Stepanov)
ce17861dc4 qt: Make PlatformStyle aware of runtime palette change (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
On macOS switching appearance (Light -> Dark or Dark -> Light) when Bitcoin Core is running makes the GUI pretty unusable.
This bug is especially important when a user chose the "Auto" mode to adjust appearance automatically.
This PR fixes Bitcoin Core behavior.
This is an alternative to #268.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
tACK c231254a65 on macOS 11.4
goums:
ACK c231254a65
promag:
Tested ACK c231254a65 on macOS Big Sur arm64.
jarolrod:
tACK c231254a65
Tree-SHA512: 122dda3e4c9703f68cec60613c536ca59d04c93f2c03398559f2361b8d279ae534800e8e677d94a33e10e769d00be54295a704e98afa2e986a06146b9f164854
7d07192dde Add src/qt/android/.gitignore (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR makes `git` ignore files created by `make apk`.
ACKs for top commit:
icota:
ACK 7d07192dde
Tree-SHA512: 4be20bd84830217a10d8ea7634799e71ed50be73f4f60c91c56311a2c95b22ff1f28d3b7bc077f1417318bb75e446e3fc3bdbf9dbc037b4cbc8428f0875f2c77
7e2a9890e5 depends: latest config.sub (2021-04-30) (fanquake)
f16d4cd8c5 depends: latest config.guess (2021-05-24) (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This is split out of #21851. Updating these files should be mechanical, and shouldn't have to wait for that PR. Also, having support in depends for the new `arm-apple-darwin` target (added in [2593751ef276497e312d7c4ce7fd049614c7bf80](https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/config.git/commit/?id=2593751ef276497e312d7c4ce7fd049614c7bf80)) is useful when debugging. i.e #22070.
If you try and compile depends for a `arm-apple-darwin` target using master, on a x86_64 darwin machine, currently you'll get:
```bash
gmake -C depends -j9 HOST=arm64-apple-darwin
Invalid configuration `arm64-apple-darwin': machine `arm64-apple' not recognized
shasum: hosts/.mk: No such file or directory
<omitted>
Makefile:111: hosts/.mk: No such file or directory
gmake: *** No rule to make target 'hosts/.mk'. Stop.
```
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 7e2a9890e5
Tree-SHA512: 8ed99b5d486c6cbca8929a752460338b6ee17f6bf93013c76589605678853c3a01ebd631b4d3f5d6aaeb6e5c21b7bbe39afc4454d3a697fafb27678f6d2c021e
13650fe2e5 [policy] detect unsorted packages (glozow)
9ef643e21b [doc] add release note for package testmempoolaccept (glozow)
c4259f4b7e [test] functional test for packages in RPCs (glozow)
9ede34a6f2 [rpc] allow multiple txns in testmempoolaccept (glozow)
ae8e6df709 [policy] limit package sizes (glozow)
c9e1a26d1f [fuzz] add ProcessNewPackage call in tx_pool fuzzer (glozow)
363e3d916c [test] unit tests for ProcessNewPackage (glozow)
cd9a11ac96 [test] make submit optional in CreateValidMempoolTransaction (glozow)
2ef187941d [validation] package validation for test accepts (glozow)
578148ded6 [validation] explicit Success/Failure ctors for MempoolAcceptResult (glozow)
b88d77aec5 [policy] Define packages (glozow)
249f43f3cc [refactor] add option to disable RBF (glozow)
897e348f59 [coins/mempool] extend CCoinsViewMemPool to track temporary coins (glozow)
42cf8b25df [validation] make CheckSequenceLocks context-free (glozow)
Pull request description:
This PR enables validation dry-runs of packages through the `testmempoolaccept` RPC. The expectation is that the results returned from `testmempoolaccept` are what you'd get from test-then-submitting each transaction individually, in that order (this means the package is expected to be sorted in topological order, for now at least). The validation is also atomic: in the case of failure, it immediately halts and may return "unfinished" `MempoolAcceptResult`s for transactions that weren't fully validated. The API for 1 transaction stays the same.
**Motivation:**
- This allows you to test validity for transaction chains (e.g. with multiple spending paths and where you don't want to broadcast yet); closes#18480.
- It's also a first step towards package validation in a minimally invasive way.
- The RPC commit happens to close#21074 by clarifying the "allowed" key.
There are a few added restrictions on the packages, mostly to simplify the logic for areas that aren't critical to main package use cases:
- No package can have conflicts, i.e. none of them can spend the same inputs, even if it would be a valid BIP125 replacement.
- The package cannot conflict with the mempool, i.e. RBF is disabled.
- The total count of the package cannot exceed 25 (the default descendant count limit), and total size cannot exceed 101KvB (the default descendant size limit).
If you're looking for review comments and github isn't loading them, I have a gist compiling some topics of discussion [here](https://gist.github.com/glozow/c3acaf161c95bba491fce31585b2aaf7)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review re-ACK 13650fe2e5
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 13650fe2e5
ariard:
ACK 13650fe
Tree-SHA512: 8c5cbfa91a6c714e1c8710bb281d5ff1c5af36741872a7c5df6b24874d6272b4a09f816cb8a4c7de33ef8e1c2a2c252c0df5105b7802f70bc6ff821ed7cc1a2f
167fb1fc72 Update Windows code signing certificate (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Updates the Windows code signing certificate to a new one issued by Digicert. This certificate has been issued to Bitcoin Core Code Signing LLC registered in Delaware, US. Note that this is different from the previous Bitcoin Core Code Signing Association registered in Zurich, Switzerland as it was unable to meet the validation requirements in time.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
utACK 167fb1f
laanwj:
ACK 167fb1fc72
Tree-SHA512: 8d5308c710ef94330417955b9bc82c5894d282798cebece82b84b425e3354e566aa6a68693ec359391ea40ddd7e2032d35ce28d104683d75ec3010ddf00be209
Pass in chainman instead of prev_block so that we can enforce the
block.hashPrevBlock refers to prev_block invariant in the function
itself.
We should probably rethink BlockAssembler's API and somehow include
commitment regeneration functionality in there. Something like a variant
of CreateNewBlock that takes in a std::vector<TxRef> and return a CBlock
instead of CBlockTemplate. That could avoid reaching for
LookupBlockIndex at all.
This is not the cleanest change but:
1. It fixes the erroneous use of RPC's Ensure*() in rest.cpp, which
cause crashes in REST contexts.
RPC code wraps all calls in a try/except, REST code does not.
Ensure*(), being part of RPC, expects that its throw's will get
caught by a try/except. But if you use Ensure*() in REST code, since
it doesn't have a try/except wrap, a crash will happen.
2. It is consistent with other functions like GetMemPool.
Someone can probably make this a bit prettier.
8caf60dbbe move-only: Group and re-order CAddrMan members by access type (Hennadii Stepanov)
5cd7f8abe3 refactor: Do not expose CAddrMan members as protected without need (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR is split from #19238 as all of its commits are trivial to review.
The last commit is easy to review with `git diff --color-moved=dimmed-zebra`.
Addressed the following comments from #19238:
- 130b82ff35 (r550865131)
> Can you consolidate all the private members and protected members to be next to each other? Multiple private and protected access specifiers make this harder to read than is necessary.
- 130b82ff35 (r557271783)
> Yeah, class declaration is easier to read if there is just one instance of `public:`, `protected:` and `private:` (in that order).
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK 8caf60dbbe
laanwj:
Code review ACK 8caf60dbbe
jarolrod:
ACK 8caf60dbbe
vasild:
ACK 8caf60dbbe
Tree-SHA512: e6127fc658da7876e36f22e2fae162dc19502ed7f8e931fdebc827dabd627e5346c6fbe6f6d0cd27fd3e5c96690ff35022ff6b48f2747b748ebd66a45c851c2b
df4c81fda4 English translations update (Hennadii Stepanov)
bfb53ddda9 scripted-diff: Fix ellipsis after pr20773 (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Update for Transifex.
After changing translator comments in #332 this update will show if Transifex triggers strings to be re-translated.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK df4c81fda4
jarolrod:
ACK df4c81fda4
Tree-SHA512: 1e54812bc04db6ae39e0b4d735b220ed8730a9941b17a0a2d09e21bcdd08e829adba86c35cf43c9be5e492ccb13e53a90149fcd7d6c0f5fdd022b978a1ff785c
cb7eba2a57 build: Use Qt archive of the same version as the compiled binaries (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR fixes broken Android APK build when the `depends/sources` directory contains Qt source archives of different versions (e.g., Qt version update [pull request](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22054) in CI with the cached `depends/sources` directory).
This is an alternative to #22058.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK cb7eba2a57
laanwj:
Code review ACK cb7eba2a57
Tree-SHA512: cf63a9809fba5cb13719d7e7bb5afc718a2cff5233b0670d30d30a0018d91278fcfc2a1b9ae8b84e8e3a52c95157bc465603cc754bb8a9d1a3d62415f01ad70f
6fe0516858 contrib: add torv3 seed nodes for testnet, drop v2 ones (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Replace the ancient (2015) Tor V2 hardcoded seeds with new Tor V3 ones. This needs to be done before 0.22 to make sure onion-only testnet nodes can still connect to the network. Continues #21560.
Ways to test:
- Re-generate ` src/chainparamsseeds.h` with `cd contrib/seeds && python3 generate-seeds.py . > ../../src/chainparamsseeds.h`, check if git tree stays the same.
- Create a new testnet node with `bitcoind -testnet -onlynet=onion -proxy=127.0.0.1:9050` (or delete `~/.bitcoin/testnet3/peers.dat`), check if it is able to connect to the network and get blocks.
- Check if the addresses are connectable for ex.:
```python3
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import subprocess
with open('contrib/seeds/nodes_test.txt') as f:
for line in (line for line in (line.rstrip().split('#', 1)[0] for line in f) if line):
subprocess.call(["nc", "-v", "-x", "127.0.0.1:9050", "-z"] + line.split(':'))
```
Thanks to jonatack for providing the list.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 6fe0516858
Tree-SHA512: 61bfdb44dfab9d02b75e5cb06c089a3b1a1fe7134875e1d09166c4116e961d809aa25422fe03f068876e9423b571ecc4a0c7a7eeacba4aac3b2768717f3ee6d6
a02c970eb0 qt, refactor: Revert explicit including QStringBuilder (Hennadii Stepanov)
3fd3a0fc87 qt, build: Optimize string concatenation (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
From [Qt docs](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qstring.html#more-efficient-string-construction):
> ... multiple uses of the \[`QString`\] '+' operator usually means multiple memory allocations. When concatenating n substrings, where n > 2, there can be as many as n - 1 calls to the memory allocator.
With this PR
> ... the '+' will automatically be performed as the `QStringBuilder` '%' everywhere.
The change in the `src/Makefile.qt.include` file does not justify submitting this PR into the main repo, IMHO.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK a02c970eb0
Talkless:
utACK a02c970eb0, built successfully on Debian Sid with Qt 5.15.2, but did not check if any displayed strings are "wrong" after refactoring.
jarolrod:
ACK a02c970eb0
Tree-SHA512: cbb476ee96f27c3bd6e125efab74d8bf24bbdb4c30576b3feea45e203405f3bf5b497dd7d3e11361fc825fcbf4b893b152921a9efdeaf73b42d1865d85f0ae84
This commit just moves functions without making any changes. It can be
reviewed with `git log -p -n1 --color-moved=dimmed_zebra`
Motivation for this change is to make wallet.cpp/h less monolithic and
start to make wallet transaction state tracking comprehensible so bugs
in
https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-devwiki/wiki/Wallet-Transaction-Conflict-Tracking
can be fixed safely without introducing new problems.
This commit moves wallet classes and methods that deal with transactions
out of wallet.cpp/.h into better organized files:
- transaction.cpp/.h - CWalletTx and CMerkleTx class definitions
- receive.cpp/.h - functions checking received transactions and computing balances
- spend.cpp/.h - functions creating transactions and finding spendable coins
After #20773, when loading is separated from syncing it will also be
possible to move more wallet.cpp/.h functions to:
- sync.cpp/.h - functions handling chain notifications and rescanning
This commit arranges receive.cpp and spend.cpp functions in dependency
order so it's possible to skim receive.cpp and get an idea of how
computing balances works, and skim spend.cpp and get an idea of how
transactions are created, without having to jump all over wallet.cpp
where functions are not in order and there is a lot of unrelated code.
Followup commit "refactor: Detach wallet transaction methods" in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21206 follows up this PR and
tweaks function names and arguments to reflect new locations. The two
commits are split into separate PRs because this commit is more work to
maintain and less work to review, while the other commit is less work to
maintain and more work to review, so hopefully this commit can be merged
earlier.
e6fe1c37d0 rpc: Improve avoidpartialspends and avoid_reuse documentation (Fabian Jahr)
8f073076b1 wallet: Increase OUTPUT_GROUP_MAX_ENTRIES to 100 (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
Follow-up to #17824.
This increases OUTPUT_GROUP_MAX_ENTRIES to 100 which means that OutputGroups will now be up to 100 outputs large, up from previously 10. The main motivation for this change is that during the PR review club on #17824 [several participants signaled](https://bitcoincore.reviews/17824.html#l-339) that 100 might be a better value here.
I think fees should be manageable for users but more importantly, users should know what they can expect when using the wallet with this configuration, so I also tried to clarify the documentation on `-avoidpartialspends` and `avoid_reuse` a bit. If there are other additional ways how or docs where users can be made aware of the potential consequences of using these parameters, please let me know. Another small upside is that [there seem to be a high number of batching transactions with 100 and 200 inputs](https://miro.medium.com/max/3628/1*sZ5eaBSbsJsHx-J9iztq2g.png)([source](https://medium.com/@hasufly/an-analysis-of-batching-in-bitcoin-9bdf81a394e0)) giving these transactions a bit of a larger anonymity set, although that is probably a very weak argument.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK e6fe1c37d0
Xekyo:
retACK e6fe1c37d0
rajarshimaitra:
tACK `e6fe1c3`
achow101:
ACK e6fe1c37d0
glozow:
code review ACK e6fe1c37d0
Tree-SHA512: 79685c58bafa64ed8303b0ecd616fce50fc9a2b758aa79833e4ad9f15760e09ab60c007bc16ab4cbc4222e644cfd154f1fa494b0f3a5d86faede7af33a6f2826
