a6b0c1fcc0 doc: add releases notes for 25504 (listsinceblock updates) (Antoine Poinsot)
0fd2d14454 rpc: add an include_change parameter to listsinceblock (Antoine Poinsot)
55f98d087e rpc: output parent wallet descriptors for coins in listunspent (Antoine Poinsot)
b724476158 rpc: output wallet descriptors for received entries in listsinceblock (Antoine Poinsot)
55a82eaf91 wallet: allow to fetch the wallet descriptors for a given Script (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
Wallet descriptors are useful for applications using the Bitcoin Core wallet as a backend for tracking coins, as they allow to track coins for multiple descriptors in a single wallet. However there is no information currently given for such applications to link a coin with an imported descriptor, severely limiting the possibilities for such applications of using multiple descriptors in a single wallet. This PR outputs the matching imported descriptor(s) for a given received coin in `listsinceblock` (and friends).
It comes from a need for an application i'm working on, but i think it's something any software using `bitcoind` to track multiple descriptors in a single wallet would have eventually. For instance i'm thinking about the BDK project. Currently, the way to achieve this is to import raw addresses with labels and to have your application be responsible for wallet things like the gap limit.
I'll add this to the output of `listunspent` too if this gets a few Concept ACKs.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK a6b0c1fcc0
achow101:
re-ACK a6b0c1fcc0
Tree-SHA512: 7a5850e8de98b439ddede2cb72de0208944f8cda67272e8b8037678738d55b7a5272375be808b0f7d15def4904430e089dafdcc037436858ff3292c5f8b75e37
It's useful for an external application tracking coins to not be limited
by our change detection. For instance, for a watchonly wallet with two
descriptors a transaction from one to the other would be considered a
change output and not be included in the result (if the address was not
generated by this wallet).
fea75ad3ca refactor: Drop `boost/algorithm/string/replace.hpp` dependency (Hennadii Stepanov)
857526e8cb test: Add test case for `ReplaceAll()` function (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
A new implementation of the `ReplaceAll()` seems enough for all of our purposes.
ACKs for top commit:
adam2k:
ACK Tested fea75ad3ca
theStack:
Code-review ACK fea75ad3ca
Tree-SHA512: dacfffc9d2bd1fb9f034baf8c045b1e8657b766db2f0a7f8ef7e25ee6cd888f315b0124c54aba7a29ae59186b176ef9868a8b709dc995ea215c6b4ce58e174d9
98383d6d0d doc: minor updates to guix README (Stacie)
Pull request description:
Two minor updates to the guix docs:
- `contrib/guix/README.md`: fix broken link
- `contrib/guix/INSTALL.md`: Change Ubuntu version in the section on distribution maintained packages from 21.04 (Hirsute Hippo) to 22.04 (Jammy Jellyfish). The previous link to the Ubuntu Guix package (https://packages.ubuntu.com/hirsute/guix) was for Hirsute. That link is now broken, likely because Hirsute reached EOL in January. I was unable to locate a general page for Ubuntu Guix packages so I replaced the broken link with the search results for all Ubuntu Guix packages. That page currently displays Guix packages for three different versions of Ubuntu. Happy to replace this link if there is a better option.
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
ACK 98383d6d0d
Tree-SHA512: 6980f5952862773e79ca317edb4aadf6ff7c71726a0e4cb873c08bf51360c64e0498aabf4f53780f13cb06838eda93c89ba10fe35c4c8ae2b23191ab961b98f8
f6a916683d Add functional test for block announcements during initial headers sync (Suhas Daftuar)
05f7f31598 Reduce bandwidth during initial headers sync when a block is found (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
On startup, if our headers chain is more than a day behind current time, we'll pick one peer to sync headers with until our best headers chain is caught up (at that point, we'll try to sync headers with all peers).
However, if an INV for a block is received before our headers chain is caught up, we'll then start to sync headers from each peer announcing the block. This can result in doing a big headers sync with many (if not all) of our peers simultaneously, which wastes bandwidth.
This PR would reduce that overhead by picking (at most) one new peer to try syncing headers with whenever a new block is announced, prior to our headers chain being caught up.
ACKs for top commit:
LarryRuane:
ACK f6a916683d
ajtowns:
ACK f6a916683d
mzumsande:
ACK f6a916683d
dergoegge:
Code review ACK f6a916683d
achow101:
ACK f6a916683d
Tree-SHA512: 0662000bd68db146f55981de4adc2e2b07cbfda222b1176569d61c22055e5556752ffd648426f69687ed1cc203105515e7304c12b915d6270df8e41a4a0e1eaa
4584d300a4 GUI: remove now unneeded 'm_balances' field from overviewpage (furszy)
050e8b1391 GUI: 'getAvailableBalance', use cached balance if the user did not select UTXO manually (furszy)
96e3264a82 GUI: use cached balance in overviewpage and sendcoinsdialog (furszy)
321335bf02 GUI: add getter for WalletModel::m_cached_balances field (furszy)
e62958dc81 GUI: sendCoinsDialog, remove duplicate wallet().getBalances() call (furszy)
Pull request description:
As per the title says, we are recalculating the entire wallet balance on different situations calling to `wallet().getBalances()`, when should instead make use of the wallet model cached balance.
This has the benefits of (1) not spending resources calculating a balance that we already have cached, and (2) avoid blocking the main thread for a long time, in case of big wallets, walking through the entire wallet's tx map more than what it's really needed.
Changes:
1) Fix: `SendCoinsDialog` was calling `wallet().getBalances()` twice during `setModel`.
2) Use the cached balance if the user did not select any UTXO manually inside the wallet model `getAvailableBalance` call.
-----------------------
As an extra note, this work born in [#25005](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25005) but grew out of scope of it.
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
ACK 4584d300a4
hebasto:
re-ACK 4584d300a4, only suggested changes and commit message formatting since my [recent](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/598#pullrequestreview-1071268192) review.
Tree-SHA512: 6633ce7f9a82a3e46e75aa7295df46c80a4cd4a9f3305427af203c9bc8670573fa8a1927f14a279260c488cc975a08d238faba2e9751588086fea1dcf8ea2b28
fcc0c8448b qt: Update source translations for string freeze (laanwj)
Pull request description:
Make sure transifex source translations match the ones in the source code after today's string freeze.
It looks like only one message was added: "Too many external signers
found".
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK fcc0c8448b, `make -C src translate` produces zero diff.
jarolrod:
ACK fcc0c8448b
Tree-SHA512: 2c2383a6f1ad086e86b7c7d35b9a06c30090a8c9517f93912b64957ec58c95c982d5340f189028717dc876e14ba2344750e3f5d81b522b0cf3d7f4586b8e0cc6
38a911e107 doc: Remove my key from SECURITY.md (laanwj)
Pull request description:
As I am no longer on the `security@bitcoincore.org` alias, there is no point in asking people to GPG-encrypt to me. Remove it.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 38a911e107
Tree-SHA512: 6f7a9aad9a2d1b2f5ce89b2521d103a7093b9ebb54e7388bfb2836b89ddb592878955088b4d2d8a141ee532a7b35d3a74737fb161280c029f1f2a3eacec99b73
fac09f4f7a refactor: Remove not needed empty RPC doc std::string (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
Not sure why this was put there, so remove it
ACKs for top commit:
aureleoules:
ACK fac09f4f7a.
Tree-SHA512: 7fae9c612dbb82db39e3dc6e20cc7d0c8128f4abf27e34f4854f908dc1bf3ad48ebee2dbbb864a9ce95e98c5d57119bf976793945a2084a43d137c2d95a25ea1
As I am no longer on the `security@bitcoincore.org` alias, there is no
point in asking people to GPG-encrypt to me. Remove it.
Tree-SHA512: f15640b741b908b162acf149ab27dae149fc917c15fbabf8dd9aff7bc6afb9e8b2ae956f9a0f8fbe1f05f40a48215becc1efda90a2e9c1105559cdeafb073060
292b1a3e9c GetExternalSigner(): fail if multiple signers are found (amadeuszpawlik)
Pull request description:
If there are multiple external signers, `GetExternalSigner()` will
just pick the first one in the list. If the user has two or more
hardware wallets connected at the same time, he might not notice this.
This PR adds a check and fails with suitable message, forcing the user to disconnect all but one external signer, so that there is no ambiguity as to which external signer was used.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
tACK 292b1a3e9c
achow101:
ACK 292b1a3e9c
Tree-SHA512: e2a41d3eecc607d4f94e708614bed0f3545f7abba85f300c5a5f0d3d17d72c815259734accc5ca370953eacd290f27894ba2c18016f5e9584cd50fa1ec2fbb0b
If our headers chain is behind on startup, then if a block is found we'll try
to catch up from all peers announcing the block, in addition to our initial
headers-sync peer. This commit changes behavior so that in this situation,
we'll choose at most one peer announcing a block to additionally sync headers
from.
Plus, calculate the cached balance right when the wallet model, so the wallet widgets don't need to redo the same balance calculation multiple times when they are waiting for the model balance polling timer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
test wise: `WalletTests` now need to trigger the walletModel balance changed manually. So the model updates its internal state and can be used by the widgets.
This is because the test does not start the balance polling timer, in the same way as does not initialize several parts of the GUI workflow. All the objects (wallet, models, views, etc) that are used on this test are manually created instead of using the `WalletController` class flow.
Rationale is that this unit test is focused on verifying the GUI widgets/views behavior only: update the presented information, etc. when they receive different signals and/or function calls from outside (in other words, focus is on the signal slots/receiver side). It's not about whether the wallet balance polling timer is functioning as expected or not (which we definitely create a new test case for it in a follow-up work).
Inside setModel, we call 'wallet().getBalances()', to set the view balance,
right before calling 'updateDisplayUnit' which calls 'wallet().getBalances()'
internally and re-sets the view balance again.
daabd41211 net: simplify GetLocalAddress() (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
There is no need to use two variables `ret` and `addr` of the same type
`CService` and assign one to the other in a strange way like
`ret = CService{addr}`.
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
ACK daabd41211
aureleoules:
ACK daabd41211.
w0xlt:
ACK daabd41211
Tree-SHA512: 4bbd3746bc30fbc05bb32b58bb122c938acd849c0f72f1d3e8170557c1999ec26a888e06e874c3fc22562a2becddc7d817db7d174e0e1b383e8d74c39aa1e898
9376a6dae4 refactor: make active_chain_tip a reference (Aurèle Oulès)
Pull request description:
This PR fixes a TODO introduced in #21055.
Makes `active_chain_tip` argument in `CheckFinalTxAtTip` function a reference instead of a pointer.
ACKs for top commit:
dongcarl:
ACK 9376a6dae4
Tree-SHA512: c36d1769e0b9598b7f79334704b26b73e958d54caa3bd7e4eff954f3964fcf3f5e3a44a5a760497afad51b76e1614c86314fe035e4083c855e3574a620de7f4d
acda7e8686 [coin selection] consolidate m_change_target and m_min_change_target (glozow)
Pull request description:
These values are both intended for the same thing. Their divergence seems to be the result of an incomplete rename.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK acda7e8686
Xekyo:
ACK acda7e8686
furszy:
ACK acda7e86
aureleoules:
ACK acda7e8686.
Tree-SHA512: 4b86171af5d893f7172373bb404bad12c49588ad1e22eb0544c242173f4bc4dede2ff1270c93c9f02f503ab8d9f66b841a8319d0ecb5e896d0fe8727cf03dbf4
b16f93cadd script/sign: remove needless IsSolvable() utility (Antoine Poinsot)
c232ef20c0 outputtype: remove redundant check for uncompressed keys in AddAndGetDestinationForScript (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
Now that we have descriptors there is no need to try to sign for a scriptPubKey using dummy signatures, and using a mocked verification of this witness against the interpreter, just to make sure we know how to spend such a Script. Just try to infer a solvable descriptor: any scriptPubKey that we can sign for can be inferred as such.
This came up in #24149 but i think it's worth it on its own.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK b16f93cadd
achow101:
re-ACK b16f93cadd
furszy:
ACK b16f93ca, only change is the `IsSolvable` helper function removal.
Tree-SHA512: 137068157ce90210b710b1bf9ac3c400e2ff5af1112f892094b69875ea473d6a899f52adb51e5030cb907dee517602059cd1661107808558efa5de842ba12b41
8b3d2bbd0d test: add tests for `datacarrier` and `datacarriersize` options (w0xlt)
Pull request description:
As suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25787, this PR adds tests for `datacarrier` and `datacarriersize` initialization options.
Close https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25787.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
re-ACK 8b3d2bbd0d
stickies-v:
re-ACK 8b3d2bbd0d
Tree-SHA512: 962638ac9659f9d641bc5d1eff0571a08085dc7d4981b534b7ede03e4c702abd7048d543c199a588e2f94567b6d2393280e686629b19d7f4b24d365662be5e40
49db42cdf5 [test] make tx6 child of tx5, not tx3, in rbf_tests (glozow)
Pull request description:
A small overlooked oopsie from #25674.
There is no effect on the test results because tx3 and tx5 pay the same fee, but this was the intended configuration, as the comment suggests.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK 49db42cdf5
darosior:
Github diff ACK 49db42cdf5. Should have catched this. :/
Tree-SHA512: 2f54337ac3edc38707115cde5b466a85b8a6ac0a0a507effa0e9fecb12c9be196ecd1b16702bc23ba617cfb6a3b5db27d3b71616b3c2dadb186c699c4609831e
70a55c059b psbt: Avoid unsigned int overflow in PSBT_IN_TAP_BIP32_DERIVATION (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Fixes#25749
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK 70a55c059b
darosior:
re-utACK 70a55c059b
jonatack:
Review ACK 70a55c059b, this should avoid the issue reported in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25749
Tree-SHA512: 6bb58e1cda9a5baa50fcd24f818b5b27ed94f0d33da3f71f6e457618176611bf2a84e1864e9a48d9303c301252bc4c1dee8b19a67dd713e849fb9442851ca341
9f9339c692 msvc: Drop `_SILENCE_CXX17_OLD_ALLOCATOR_MEMBERS_DEPRECATION_WARNING` (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
It is no longer needed.
ACKs for top commit:
sipsorcery:
tACK 9f9339c692.
Tree-SHA512: 7bcb9df4629726ddb8b23e73b186635be54a5e5379928ce250ba2fba7a6d6f1dda98429b8329790e34fcb3861a8b00c6954746ea78e99693b86c51017c4713e0
fb9faffae3 extended keys: fail to derive too large depth instead of wrapping around (Antoine Poinsot)
8dc6670ce1 descriptor: don't assert success of extended key derivation (Antoine Poinsot)
50cfc9e761 (pubk)key: mark Derive() as nodiscard (Antoine Poinsot)
0ca258a5ac descriptor: never ignore the return value when deriving an extended key (Antoine Poinsot)
d3599c22bd spkman: don't ignore the return value when deriving an extended key (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
We would previously silently wrap the derived child's depth back to `0`. Instead, explicitly fail when trying to derive an impossible depth, and handle the error in callers.
An extended fuzzing corpus of `descriptor_parse` triggered this behaviour, which was reported by MarcoFalke.
Fixes#25751.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK fb9faffae3
instagibbs:
utACK fb9faffae3
Tree-SHA512: 9f75c23572ce847239bd15e5497df2960b6bd63c61ea72347959d968b5c4c9a4bfeee284e76bdcd7bacbf9eeb70feee85ffd3e316f353ca6eca30e93aafad343
