11a32722f0 test: run mempool_resurrect.py even with wallet disabled (Michael Dietz)
Pull request description:
Another functional test rewritten as proposed in #20078
**Request for help:**
`node.gettransaction(txid)` fails for transactions sent with `wallet.send_self_transfer`. Even though the `txid`s look correct, are added to the mempool correctly, and removed from the mempool when a block is mined - all as expected.
However, `node.gettransaction(txid)` throws the error:
```sh
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Users/michaeldietz/Documents/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 126, in main
self.run_test()
File "/Users/michaeldietz/Documents/bitcoin/test/functional/mempool_resurrect.py", line 43, in run_test
assert_equal(len(list(filter(lambda txid: node.gettransaction(txid)["confirmations"] > 0, spends_ids))), len(spends_ids))
File "/Users/michaeldietz/Documents/bitcoin/test/functional/mempool_resurrect.py", line 43, in <lambda>
assert_equal(len(list(filter(lambda txid: node.gettransaction(txid)["confirmations"] > 0, spends_ids))), len(spends_ids))
File "/Users/michaeldietz/Documents/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/coverage.py", line 47, in __call__
return_val = self.auth_service_proxy_instance.__call__(*args, **kwargs)
File "/Users/michaeldietz/Documents/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/authproxy.py", line 146, in __call__
raise JSONRPCException(response['error'], status)
test_framework.authproxy.JSONRPCException: Invalid or non-wallet transaction id (-5)
```
Anyone know what's going wrong / can point me in the right direction if I'm making a mistake, or `MiniWallet` needs to be improved for this to work correctly?
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 11a32722f0
Tree-SHA512: 13d83a13ec23920db716e99b68670e61329d1cc73b12063d85bc1679ee6425a9951da4d2e392ca1f27760be7be049ccdc6f504e192ed5cd24ed0ba003b66fab3
fa4435e22f Replace boost::optional with std::optional (MarcoFalke)
fa7e803f3e Remove unused MakeOptional (MarcoFalke)
fadd4029dc psbt: Assert that tx has a value in UpdatePSBTOutput (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Now that we can use std::optional from the vanilla standard library, drop the third-party boost dependency
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK fa4435e22f: patch looks correct!
laanwj:
code review ACK fa4435e22f
hebasto:
ACK fa4435e22f, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: 50c5a1a130cac65e043e0177ba5b009fc2ba09343af4e23322ff2eb32184a55f8f2dea66e7a1b9d9acf56bc164eef4e47448750549a07f3b661199ac9bf9afef
3c2478c385 ci: Print COMMIT_RANGE to the log as it was in Travis CI (Hennadii Stepanov)
c123892c2e ci: Drop Travis-specific workaround for shellcheck (Hennadii Stepanov)
10af252d97 ci: Drop Travis-specific way to set COMMIT_RANGE variable (Hennadii Stepanov)
93504da3a9 ci: Fix COMMIT_RANGE variable value for PRs (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR:
- is a #20658 and #20682 followup
- set the `COMMIT_RANGE` variable correctly for PRs
- cleans up Travis-specific code
- prints COMMIT_RANGE value to the log for convenience as it was in Travis CI
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 3c2478c385
Tree-SHA512: beb933352b10fd5eb3e66373ddb62439e4f3a03b50fb037ee89fa92c0706cec41d05f2d307f15bb18d1e634e6464f4e123b7e2f88703c8edfd145d8d6eff0b1a
d8b9cec25b inline non-member functions with body in fuzzing headers (Patrick Strateman)
Pull request description:
Resolves the issue noted [here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20560#issuecomment-748339644)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK d8b9cec25b
Tree-SHA512: fb34707e2d2c5b664d4160e0e4b56e3df9fb2c9045da6ddea7139e0b4982262c4e085812a8543a6221febc9cd0815423b8287fec66baae3236e5f3339cc9df8c
This was previously done implicitly in boost::optional by BOOST_ASSERT.
Also, it was checked at runtime by valgrind if for some reason the
assert was disabled.
std::optional dereference won't assert, so add the Assert here
explicitly.
The explicit Assert also helps to document the code better.
a0a771843f contrib: Changes to checks for PowerPC64 (Luke Dashjr)
634f6ec4eb contrib: Parse ELF directly for symbol and security checks (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Instead of the ever-messier text parsing of the output of the readelf tool (which is clearly meant for human consumption not to be machine parseable), parse the ELF binaries directly.
Add a small dependency-less ELF parser specific to the checks.
This is slightly more secure, too, because it removes potential ambiguity due to misparsing and changes in the output format of `elfread`. It also allows for stricter and more specific ELF format checks in the future.
This removes the build-time dependency for `readelf`.
It passes the test-security-check for me locally, ~~though I haven't checked on all platforms~~. I've checked that this works on the cross-compile output for all ELF platforms supported by Bitcoin Core at the moment, as well as PPC64 LE and BE.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 7f9241fec83ee512642fecf5afd90546964561efd8c8c0f99826dcf6660604a4db2b7255e1afb1e9bb0211fd06f5dbad18a6175dfc03e39761a40025118e7bfc
6d1e85f475 Clean up logging of outbound connection type (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
We have a function that converts `ConnectionType` enums to strings, so use it.
Suggested by ajtowns in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19858#discussion_r540791588
ACKs for top commit:
amitiuttarwar:
ACK 6d1e85f475
naumenkogs:
ACK 6d1e85f
Tree-SHA512: f5084d8b5257380696d9fde86a8873e190cd4553feb07fa49df39bbd9510bf5832d190a3bca1571c48370d16a17c7a34900857b21b27bec0777bfa710211d7bb
faeb40bee3 ci: Install missing lint packages (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The cirrus container is vanilla ubuntu, so we need to install the needed packages
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK faeb40bee3, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: e56198108e26ea0ba2a344b1b74bc294652f34e9866cca053a25fb1b83bbd87ea40254c340e5e169fdfcbd4dcb39fdc2078b5157ca729a22a9a1792ec514a33e
e71b656f31 qt: Align layout of checkboxes (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
From https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/20555#issuecomment-747742627:
> 0.21.0rc3 compiled from source, Ubuntu 20.04 + i3: tested mainnet, testnet, and signet. created a descriptor wallet in qt, tested torv3 with addnode, and checked if anchors.dat is created on shutdown and removed on startup.
>
> I've noticed the "Advanced options" label being cut-off in the wallet creation dialog.
This PR should fix this issue.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK e71b656f31
Tree-SHA512: dcc997a440a96fc936296323afaf9f4040ac06cf5ad32724a88c2e2e16c726c35b1b2bacbb3e081839d8a69b5a6086b2570d6b2e98976f29b5427db2d434eee9
fae32f295c wallet: Add missing check for -descriptors wallet tool option (MarcoFalke)
faf8f61368 test: Add missing check for is_sqlite_compiled (MarcoFalke)
fa7dde1c41 wallet: Pass ArgsManager into ExecuteWalletToolFunc instead of using global (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Also, fix a test failure when compiled without sqlite
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fae32f295c. Thanks for implementing the -descriptors check and dealing with the test failure!
jonatack:
Code review utACK fae32f295c
Tree-SHA512: 3d7710694085822739a8316e4abc6db270799ca6ff6b0f9e5563ae240da65ae6a9cab7ba2647feae6ba540dac40b55b38ed41c8f6ed0bf02a3d1536284448927
95487b0553 doc: Drop mentions of Travis CI as it is no longer used (Hennadii Stepanov)
09d105ef0f ci: Drop travis_fold feature as Travis CI is no longer used (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
As Travis CI is no longer used, this PR:
- drops `travis_fold` feature
- drops mentions of Travis CI in docs
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 95487b0553
Tree-SHA512: 2e259bb8b1e37bcefc1251737bb2716f06ddb57c490010b373825c4e70f42ca38efae69a2f63f21f577d7cee3725b94097bdddbd313f8ebf499281cf97c53cef
a4118c6e20 Add patch to make codesign_allocate compatible with Apple's (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This is an alternative to #20638.
The problem is that Apple's codesign(_allocate) apparently rounds the "vmsize" attribute on the __LINKEDIT section to a multiple of 0x2000 on x86_64 rather than 0x1000 (as their published source code does). This divergence means that the binary signed by codesign is slightly different from the one recreated by our reattach-sig-to-gitian-output process, and the signature being invalid.
This fixes it by patching our codesign_allocate source code to also use 0x2000. In tests, this appears to result in matching binaries.
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
Tested ACK a4118c6e20 - removed the osx cache, built commit a4118c6e20 for osx in gitian (dependency where built, patch was applied), signed on my signing mac (detach-sig-create), ran gitian osx signer with the produces signature and the a4118c6e20 build (detach-sig-apply), signature then was successful verified on my Mac (codesign -v /Volumes/Bitcoin-Core/Bitcoin-Qt.app)
MarcoFalke:
Concept ACK a4118c6e20
Tree-SHA512: 07b8cdf8216249ddfe4bd38b39f2b48b2e190d4002b84d8981e62197bbbc9f25ac5c137bcc32057b23fbf38cbb2889ef95101ce008edfbf608cd170b88b3acbc
23d8f34689 fuzz: replace CNode code with fuzz/util.h::ConsumeNode() (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Noticed this while updating the CNode fuzzing in #20210.
- cc26fab48d created `test/fuzz/net.cpp` in May 2020
- 79ef8324d4 created a CNode factory utility `test/fuzz/util.h::ConsumeNode()` in October 2020
This PR updates `fuzz/net.cpp` from the first commit to use `ConsumeNode()` from the second commit.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 23d8f34689
Tree-SHA512: 26f7685395b3d48fcf40dde0d479d5c2fb4e953ec9371940b19eee16bb30aee4840b081e1a918b924a9704c1bef484302ea3e8fe63819a3bba73e7eb805164f1
7b6887e75a doc: Convert depends options list from html to markdown (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
This makes it easier to read in `less`, which is important for install instructions.
Rendered: [before](7ef6b1c51d/depends (dependency-options)) - [after](d97042406f/depends/README.md (dependency-options))
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Code review re-ACK 7b6887e75a per `git diff d970424 7b6887e`
hebasto:
re-ACK 7b6887e75a
Tree-SHA512: 02970b2bb97d2e8fb2d66470f6d70662653fda176bf6f4861742823b361fdc7ab6a2b44143480ac1a525b8d7808b6a068e8b3677dbba16cd783b4cab90470af5
23cac24dd3 tests: Test bitcoin-wallet dump and createfromdump (Andrew Chow)
a88c320041 wallettool: Add createfromdump command (Andrew Chow)
e1e7a90d5f wallettool: Add dump command (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Adds two commands to the `bitcoin-wallet` tool: `dump` and `createfromdump`. These commands will be useful for a wallet storage migration in the future. It is also generally useful to have a storage agnostic dump like this. These commands are similar to BDB's `db_dump` and `db_load` tools. This can also be useful for manual construction of a wallet file for tests.
`dump` outputs every key-value pair from the wallet as comma separated hex. Each key-value pair is on its own line with the key and value in hex separated by a comma. This is output to the file specified by the new `-dumpfile` option.
`createfromdump` takes a file produced by `dump` and creates a new wallet file with exactly the records specified in that file.
A new option `-dumpfile` is added to the wallet tool. When used with `dump`, the records will be written to the specified file. When used with `createfromdump`, the file is read and the key-value pairs constructed from it. `createfromdump` requires `-dumpfile`.
A simple round-trip test is added to the `tool_wallet.py`.
This PR is based on #19334,
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-utACK 23cac24
MarcoFalke:
re review ACK 23cac24dd3 only change is rebase and removing useless shared_ptr wrapper 🎼
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 23cac24dd3. Only changes since last review rebase and changing a pointer to a reference
Tree-SHA512: 2d63cf62baca3d16495aa698dc02f7d889c81b41015e9c92c23c275bb4a690fc176d351c3fd7f310bd6b17f5a936cc9be694cbecd702af741b96c0f530e72fa2
cc3044ccdb fix misleading comment about call to non-existing function (pox)
Pull request description:
The comment seems to be describing the subsequent call to `SyncTransaction` but refers to it as `SyncNotifications`, which is not any function currently in the codebase.
It's best to just remove the "what" aspect of the comment and focus on the "why", which also reduces the risk of similar documentation errors in the future, in case the function ever gets renamed, for example.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK cc3044ccdb
Tree-SHA512: 882ff17836ef585a603dc504f3dd21f56f682e49b28a0998f23fd16025826fbb083b7978db3ee70d0e0ff2c86fd6c3fd99a2361e5d45c765fdc5822c5f14c0a7
