fac6cfe5ac lint: commit-script-check.sh: echo to stderr (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This makes it easier to redirect the produced `git diff` on failure. On success, it shouldn't hurt, because the same output is still present, just on stderr.
Can be tested by introducing a fault in any scripted diff and then calling `commit-script-check.sh HEAD~..HEAD > any_file.txt`. Previously the file contained the full output, now it contains just the diff.
ACKs for top commit:
TheCharlatan:
ACK fac6cfe5ac
Tree-SHA512: b4dfad10a4a902729a7ad7533ed0ef86b9e79761083f2ec623d448a551462b268fe04bdba387ca62160dae9ef7b1781e005dec60f18b111d9bfa6b97357108e6
cd0edf26c0 tracing: cast block_connected duration to nanoseconds (0xb10c)
Pull request description:
When the `validation:block_connected` tracepoint was introduced in 8f37f5c2a5, the connect block duration was passed in microseconds `µs`. By starting to use steady clock in fabf1cdb20 this changed to nanoseconds `ns`. As the test only checked if the duration value is `> 0` as a plausibility check, this went unnoticed. This was detected this when setting up monitoring for block validation time as part of the Great Consensus Cleanup Revival discussion.
This change casts the duration explicitly to nanoseconds, updates the documentation, and adds a check for an upper bound to the tracepoint interface tests. The upper bound is quite lax as mining the block takes much longer than connecting the empty test block. It's however able to detect a duration passed in an incorrect unit (1000x off).
A previous version of this PR casted the duration to microseconds `µs` - however, as the last three major releases have had the duration as nanoseconds (and this went unnoticed), we assume that this is the API now and changeing it back to microseconds would break the API again. See also https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29877#issuecomment-2067867597
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
re-lgtm ACK cd0edf26c0
laanwj:
re-ACK cd0edf26c0
Tree-SHA512: 54a1eea0297e01c07c2d071ffafbf97dbd080f763e1dc0014ff086a913b739637c1634b1cf87c90b94a3c2f66006acfaada0414a15769cac761e03bc4aab2a77
184f12c154 doc: remove dependency install instructions from win docs (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This duplicates what is in depends, and is outdated.
Closes#31090.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 184f12c154
jarolrod:
ACK 184f12c154
BrandonOdiwuor:
ACK 184f12c154
Tree-SHA512: 089c9ff91c501c22ec1b9d5925a2b8c6cd1ea9ac2b75dd6a8c5fe75cf2f0090d808842cb321017894d2da70a30a87dbc1c4c481771d3c4aba13ce44244fcf392
a647d4400d doc: update signet documentation related to build directories (Torkel Rogstad)
Pull request description:
While setting up my own signet I noticed that the binary paths in the documentation for this is out of date, after build artifacts moved to the `build` directory. This PR mimics what happened in #30741
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK a647d4400d
pablomartin4btc:
ACK a647d4400d
tdb3:
Code review and light test ACK a647d4400d
Tree-SHA512: ac7c3806e0ff65860c41d7b7bdad538368d8a6d8d289c10f9714804f963bafd3a9658301b6697f110f5462a92826b62770963508d5eebf88bf9a0a8442d9f72d
fa43c4f93c test: Print CompletedProcess object on error (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
It would be good to know the output on `Error parsing command output`. Otherwise test failures are meaningless: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/30792#issuecomment-2325911157
Fix it by just printing the full `CompletedProcess` object.
Also, use the modern `subprocess.run` to simplify the code.
ACKs for top commit:
BrandonOdiwuor:
Code Review ACK fa43c4f93c
laanwj:
This contains some useful information, so ACK fa43c4f93c
Tree-SHA512: ae7c1cb1f48af2a6feae6d1a5a967c0720f6c6675c1ce20ace7cac18c00f3d4069b8abcc58204855e92ff5303158b9a942bab3b71acae0737768d941a5773c91
ec585f11c3 Reserve space for transaction inputs in CreateTransactionInternal (Lőrinc)
c76aaaf900 Reserve space for transaction outputs in CreateTransactionInternal (Lőrinc)
Pull request description:
Reserved memory for the transaction inputs and outputs.
Split out of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30050/files#r1597631104
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK ec585f11c3
TheCharlatan:
ACK ec585f11c3
stickies-v:
ACK ec585f11c3
Tree-SHA512: de399fb19824423467f48af64aa57f41a23cdd00eb17461e0131e4deafdd15e0d2daebf6a0a7ac7728b2fb486b2a54f1a7ef26bbe823c56b2a09f892f6b9a581
fa1b139d17 Bump python minimum supported version to 3.10 (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
All supported operating systems ship with python 3.10 (or later), so bumping the minimum should not cause any issues. A bump will allow new code to use new python features.
For reference:
* https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/python3
* https://packages.ubuntu.com/jammy/python3
* FreeBSD 13/14 ships with 3.11
* CentOS-like 8/9 ships with 3.11/3.12 (via `appstream`)
* OpenSuse Tumbleweed ships with all python versions, e.g. https://software.opensuse.org/package/python312-base
This is for Bitcoin Core 29.0 in 2025 (next year), not the soon upcoming 28.0 this fall.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fa1b139d17
AngusP:
ACK fa1b139d17
l0rinc:
ACK fa1b139d17
stickies-v:
ACK fa1b139d17
Tree-SHA512: 910b202ff2374bb21c93e5249a151fd2c8f63759bed5659676b0e467afa6e8e977be797c3fccceca303c82575e11ec236a8d7c5880910e4314b3875b820e7e8a
a0e089a71d build: Bump minimum supported macOS to 13.0 (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Running Bitcoin Core on unsupported OSes may expose users to security issues.
macOS Monterey 12 received its final security update ([12.7.6](https://support.apple.com/en-us/100100)) on July 2024. Apple classifies the hardware that can run macOS 12 at most as ["obsolete worldwide"](https://support.apple.com/en-us/102772).
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK a0e089a71d
m3dwards:
ACK a0e089a71d
itornaza:
reACK a0e089a71d
Tree-SHA512: b219730de87bcb2bcb40a972e910f516c739a538b0741fc245d23df04650f7e2f5774c38c1d1c9c053ed9e2a377488002feb708e8c7cba9c0070b81169719b10
There is no need to compare the field to CLIENT_VERSION. Either the
format remains compatible and the value can be left unchanged, or it is
incompatible and the value needs to be increased to at least 289900+1.
d823ba6e20 doc: fuzz: remove Honggfuzz NetDriver instructions (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
Remove Honggfuzz NetDriver instructions from the documentation since it has not been useful for us. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/30957 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31012.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK d823ba6e20
marcofleon:
ACK d823ba6e20
Tree-SHA512: f63fde1076d523dc5e511ef868ca3c1ea2e38fe7df56ae275f33209581f96452d86effedb54d9b0ee8b7a1d492b610799807a727d8bd81e2286d31db4aa68731
e64b2f1a16 doc: cmake: prepend and explain "build/" where needed (Larry Ruane)
Pull request description:
This is a small follow-on to #30741, prepend `build/` to the path for `test_runner.py`.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK e64b2f1a16
maflcko:
lgtm ACK e64b2f1a16
tdb3:
re ACK e64b2f1a16
Tree-SHA512: 80943d4f342987bf060adacb1c7db2e9ff8de5a6da592846ba23f230281d3a5b306162c4c86e61739a29323eaa4abf09f69f41302996d5809f448e5788a74a87
1fe1b3ba8e doc: doxygen comment for m_args usage in tests (willcl-ark)
Pull request description:
Closes: #25055
Add a doxygen comment to the `m_args` member in the unit test framework, clarifying its purpose and providing usage guidelines.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 1fe1b3ba8e
brunoerg:
ACK 1fe1b3ba8e
Tree-SHA512: 9b8dc30e3b0d26c0cecec4599dc5addca519965603073d02f37fa0a46c488659958e327d9c25da8acdb4bb9b082a64455baaffb406ac11827d7f56a094522fce
Running Bitcoin Core on unsupported OSes may expose users to security
issues.
macOS Monterey 12 received its final security update (12.7.6) on July
2024. Apple classifies the hardware that can run macOS 12 at most as
"obsolete worldwide".
ccd10fdb97 build: Add missing USDT header dependency to kernel (Cory Fields)
Pull request description:
Noticed while testing a branch that replaces `boost::multi_index` with a custom replacement.
Currently depends builds pick up usdt and boost from the same path, and because boost always exists, the usdt path is implicitly included. So without boost, USDT isn't found.
An alternative to this would be to disable USDT for the kernel. I'd be open to either approach.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK ccd10fdb97, the diff looks correct.
fanquake:
ACK ccd10fdb97
Tree-SHA512: 2f91b8d5c8b169f7b72323d9163b5201f606ccdab95de7085847d2a672d10f940f69642c2528226a5efa4c589af24ca3bb9dd909eed0993e4cecd9689b4bed2f
0b3ec8c59b clusterlin: remove Cluster type (Pieter Wuille)
1c24c62510 clusterlin: merge two DepGraph fuzz tests into simulation test (Pieter Wuille)
0606e66fdb clusterlin: add DepGraph::RemoveTransactions and support for holes in DepGraph (Pieter Wuille)
75b5d42419 clusterlin: make DepGraph::AddDependency support multiple dependencies at once (Pieter Wuille)
abf50649d1 clusterlin: simplify DepGraphFormatter::Ser (Pieter Wuille)
eaab55ffc8 clusterlin: rework DepGraphFormatter::Unser (Pieter Wuille)
5901cf7100 clusterlin: abstract out DepGraph::GetReduced{Parents,Children} (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Part of cluster mempool: #30289
This adds:
* `DepGraph::AddDependencies` to add 0 or more dependencies to a single transaction at once (identical to calling `DepGraph::AddDependency` once for each, but more efficient).
* `DepGraph::RemoveTransactions` to remove 0 or more transactions from a depgraph.
* `DepGraph::GetReducedParents` (and `DepGraph::GetReducedChildren`) to get the (reduced) direct parents and children of a transaction in a depgraph.
After which, the `Cluster` type is removed.
This is the result of fleshing out the design for the "intermediate layer" ("TxGraph", no PR yet) between the cluster linearization layer and the mempool layer. My earlier thinking was that TxGraph would store `Cluster` objects (vectors of pairs of `FeeFrac`s and sets of parents), and convert them to `DepGraph` on the fly whenever needed. However, after more consideration, it seems better to have TxGraph store `DepGraph` objects, and manipulate them directly without constantly re-creating them. This requires `DepGraph` to have some additional functionality.
The bulk of the complexity here is the addition of `DepGraph::RemoveTransactions`, which leaves the remaining transactions' positions within the `DepGraph` untouched (we want existing identifiers to remain valid), so this implies that graphs can now have "holes" (positions that are unused, but followed by positions that are used). To enable that, an extension of the fuzz/test serialization format `DepGraphFormatter` is included to deal with such holes.
ACKs for top commit:
sdaftuar:
reACK 0b3ec8c59b
instagibbs:
reACK 0b3ec8c59b
ismaelsadeeq:
reACK 0b3ec8c59b
glozow:
ACK 0b3ec8c59b, reviewed range-diff from aab53ddcd8fcbc3c0be0da9383f8e06abe5badda and `clusterlin_depgraph_sim`
Tree-SHA512: a804b7f26d544c5cb0847322e235c810525cb0607737be6116c3156d582da3ba3352af8ea48e74eed5268f9c3eca63b30181d01b23a6dd0be1b99191f81cceb0
882f736d0a doc: lint: correct outdated comment (s/Makefile.am/CMakeLists.txt/) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
1786be7b4a scripted-diff: drop config/ subdir for bitcoin-config.h, rename to bitcoin-build-config.h (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR is a follow-up to #30856, as suggested in comment https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30856#issuecomment-2356804690. With the scripted diff, review should be fairly trivial, but it could still be seen as controversial due to the large number of files (78 in total) being touched.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 882f736d0a
Tree-SHA512: 2e6cae4590f660e741edf84df456168b8b1f3861d381cfebf6647bb0a303c26bf7b969a837e0058e59bf852d220990dd8f5f400d8975fd0fab106d0507a70c9b
The chainstate caches are currently re-balanced on startup
even in the non-assumeutxo case, leading to the database being
needlessly re-opened and its cache re-allocated.
Similar to `InitCoinsCache` and `m_coinstip_cache_size_bytes` the
`m_coinsdb_cache_size_bytes` should be set in `InitCoinsDB`.
Together with only conservatively setting the cache values when a
assumeutxo chainstate is present, this allows for skipping the cache
re-balance during initialization in the normal non-assumeutxo case.
525e9dcba0 Add submitSolution to BlockTemplate interface (Sjors Provoost)
47b4875ef0 Add getCoinbaseMerklePath() to Mining interface (Sjors Provoost)
63d6ad7c89 Move BlockMerkleBranch back to merkle.{h,cpp} (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
The new `BlockTemplate` interface introduced in #30440 allows for a more efficient way for a miner to submit the block solution. Instead of having the send the full block, it only needs to provide the nonce, timestamp, version fields and coinbase transaction.
This PR introduces `submitSolution()` for that. It's currently unused.
#29432 and https://github.com/Sjors/bitcoin/pull/48 use it to process the Stratum v2 message [SubmitSolution](https://github.com/stratum-mining/sv2-spec/blob/main/07-Template-Distribution-Protocol.md#77-submitsolution-client---server). The method should be sufficiently generic to work with alternative mining protocols (none exist that I'm aware off).
This PR also introduces `getCoinbaseMerklePath()`, which is needed in Stratum v2 to construct the `merkle_path` field of the `NewTemplate` message (see [spec](https://github.com/stratum-mining/sv2-spec/blob/main/07-Template-Distribution-Protocol.md#72-newtemplate-server---client)). The coinbase merkle path is also used in Stratum "v1", see e.g. https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/109820/questions-on-merkle-root-hashing-for-stratum-pools
This last function uses `BlockMerkleBranch` which was moved to the test code in #13191. The reason back then for moving it was that it was no longer used. This PR moves it back.
This PR does not change behaviour since both methods are unused.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 525e9dcba0
itornaza:
Code review ACK 525e9dcba0
tdb3:
Code review and light test ACK 525e9dcba0
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 525e9dcba0. Left minor suggestions but none are important, and looks like this could be merged as-is
Tree-SHA512: 2a6a8f5d409ff4926643193cb67702240c7c687615414371e53383d2c13c485807f65e21e8ed98515b5456eca3d9fca13cec04675814a4081467d88b849c5653
36a6d4b007 doc: update IBD requirements in doc/README.md (Mackain)
Pull request description:
A small change to the first paragraph of the Setup part of the README that has been bugging me for a while.
The disk space required for the Bitcoin transactions can no longer be described as "a few" hundred gigabytes.
So I thought it was time it was changed to "several" instead.
<!--
*** Please remove the following help text before submitting: ***
Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
immediately.
GUI-related pull requests should be opened against
https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui
first. See CONTRIBUTING.md
-->
<!--
Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it improves
Bitcoin Core user experience or Bitcoin Core developer experience
significantly:
* Any test improvements or new tests that improve coverage are always welcome.
* All other changes should have accompanying unit tests (see `src/test/`) or
functional tests (see `test/`). Contributors should note which tests cover
modified code. If no tests exist for a region of modified code, new tests
should accompany the change.
* Bug fixes are most welcome when they come with steps to reproduce or an
explanation of the potential issue as well as reasoning for the way the bug
was fixed.
* Features are welcome, but might be rejected due to design or scope issues.
If a feature is based on a lot of dependencies, contributors should first
consider building the system outside of Bitcoin Core, if possible.
* Refactoring changes are only accepted if they are required for a feature or
bug fix or otherwise improve developer experience significantly. For example,
most "code style" refactoring changes require a thorough explanation why they
are useful, what downsides they have and why they *significantly* improve
developer experience or avoid serious programming bugs. Note that code style
is often a subjective matter. Unless they are explicitly mentioned to be
preferred in the [developer notes](/doc/developer-notes.md), stylistic code
changes are usually rejected.
-->
<!--
Bitcoin Core has a thorough review process and even the most trivial change
needs to pass a lot of eyes and requires non-zero or even substantial time
effort to review. There is a huge lack of active reviewers on the project, so
patches often sit for a long time.
-->
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 36a6d4b007
danielabrozzoni:
ACK 36a6d4b007
jonatack:
ACK 36a6d4b007
ismaelsadeeq:
ACK 36a6d4b007
tdb3:
ACK 36a6d4b007
itornaza:
ACK 36a6d4b007
Tree-SHA512: c5b21aca526c0ebe5f3234bd72e4080dc64cbba0ccd2306397aafe8349bc3573773ee64ff31fafcf59ea1afc7527caaf6d7cd8fe798311d9dc11ad0cd539e21e
ca2e4ba352 refactor: include the proper header rather than forward-declaring RemovalReasonToString (Cory Fields)
Pull request description:
Trivial no-op fixup.
This was pointed out by #31053, which causes the include order to be shuffled around:
```
[21:49:26.130] /ci_container_base/src/validationinterface.cpp:22:13: error: redundant 'RemovalReasonToString' declaration [readability-redundant-declaration,-warnings-as-errors]
[21:49:26.130] 22 | std::string RemovalReasonToString(const MemPoolRemovalReason& r) noexcept;
[21:49:26.130] | ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[21:49:26.130] /ci_container_base/src/kernel/mempool_removal_reason.h:22:13: note: previously declared here
[21:49:26.130] 22 | std::string RemovalReasonToString(const MemPoolRemovalReason& r) noexcept;
[21:49:26.130] | ^
```
I don't see any reason why the include shouldn't just be used.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK ca2e4ba352
hebasto:
ACK ca2e4ba352, IWYU seems [agree](https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6170839912022016):
TheCharlatan:
ACK ca2e4ba352
Tree-SHA512: e3584cae4f50bf2bc6c824bfaddfe683ef6a17d16138d0cbcc544b98bd64d5d7353b0826b1e8cf16e12410e27b0fcedde27100d4241b7cc194cd4465c8175a5b
33381ea530 scripted-diff: Modernize nLocalServices to m_local_services (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
The type of the `nLocalServices` variable was changed to `std::atomic<ServiceFlags>` in #30807 and I suggested the variable name to get updated with a scripted diff along with it. It wasn't included in the PR but I am still suggesting to do it as a follow-up since I had already prepared the commit.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 33381ea530
achow101:
ACK 33381ea530
furszy:
utACK 33381ea530
jonatack:
ACK 33381ea530
theStack:
ACK 33381ea530
Tree-SHA512: 407ea9eac694f079aa5b5c1611b5874d7a0897ba6bc3aa0570be94afe1bf3a826657b6890b6597c03c063e95b9dc868f0bdfbfc41e77ec7e06f5b045bf065c71
