Bitcoin Core mirror and no, I don't give a fuck about Monero.
Find a file
Ava Chow 0c2c3bb3f5
Some checks are pending
CI / ASan + LSan + UBSan + integer, no depends, USDT (push) Waiting to run
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, no depends, sqlite only, gui (push) Waiting to run
CI / test each commit (push) Waiting to run
CI / Win64 native, VS 2022 (push) Waiting to run
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30955: Mining interface: getCoinbaseMerklePath() and submitSolution()
525e9dcba0 Add submitSolution to BlockTemplate interface (Sjors Provoost)
47b4875ef0 Add getCoinbaseMerklePath() to Mining interface (Sjors Provoost)
63d6ad7c89 Move BlockMerkleBranch back to merkle.{h,cpp} (Sjors Provoost)

Pull request description:

  The new `BlockTemplate` interface introduced in #30440 allows for a more efficient way for a miner to submit the block solution. Instead of having the send the full block, it only needs to provide the nonce, timestamp, version fields and coinbase transaction.

  This PR introduces `submitSolution()` for that. It's currently unused.

  #29432 and https://github.com/Sjors/bitcoin/pull/48 use it to process the Stratum v2 message [SubmitSolution](https://github.com/stratum-mining/sv2-spec/blob/main/07-Template-Distribution-Protocol.md#77-submitsolution-client---server). The method should be sufficiently generic to work with alternative mining protocols (none exist that I'm aware off).

  This PR also introduces `getCoinbaseMerklePath()`, which is needed in Stratum v2 to construct the `merkle_path` field of the `NewTemplate` message (see [spec](https://github.com/stratum-mining/sv2-spec/blob/main/07-Template-Distribution-Protocol.md#72-newtemplate-server---client)). The coinbase merkle path is also used in Stratum "v1", see e.g. https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/109820/questions-on-merkle-root-hashing-for-stratum-pools

  This last function uses `BlockMerkleBranch` which was moved to the test code in #13191. The reason back then for moving it was that it was no longer used. This PR moves it back.

  This PR does not change behaviour since both methods are unused.

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    ACK 525e9dcba0
  itornaza:
    Code review ACK 525e9dcba0
  tdb3:
    Code review and light test ACK 525e9dcba0
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK 525e9dcba0. Left minor suggestions but none are important, and looks like this could be merged as-is

Tree-SHA512: 2a6a8f5d409ff4926643193cb67702240c7c687615414371e53383d2c13c485807f65e21e8ed98515b5456eca3d9fca13cec04675814a4081467d88b849c5653
2024-10-09 20:20:09 -04:00
.github ci: Install missing nproc in macos task 2024-10-07 12:28:23 +02:00
.tx qt: Bump Transifex slug for 28.x 2024-07-30 16:14:19 +01:00
ci Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#31045: ci: Add missing -DWERROR=ON to test-each-commit 2024-10-08 15:36:30 +01:00
cmake cmake: Avoid hardcoding Qt's major version in Find module 2024-10-01 13:43:30 +01:00
contrib Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30929: log: Enforce trailing newline 2024-10-02 19:05:34 -04:00
depends Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#31013: depends: For mingw cross compile use -gcc-posix to prevent library conflict 2024-10-08 15:22:53 +01:00
doc Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30992: doc: update IBD requirements in doc/README.md 2024-10-09 20:01:16 -04:00
share doc: Updating docs from autotools to cmake 2024-09-18 11:04:52 -04:00
src Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30955: Mining interface: getCoinbaseMerklePath() and submitSolution() 2024-10-09 20:20:09 -04:00
test Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30920: test: Remove 0.16.3 test from wallet_backwards_compatibility.py 2024-10-08 16:10:04 +01:00
.cirrus.yml ci: Inline PACKAGE_MANAGER_INSTALL 2024-09-26 18:52:08 +02:00
.editorconfig code style: update .editorconfig file 2024-09-13 17:55:10 +02:00
.gitattributes Separate protocol versioning from clientversion 2014-10-29 00:24:40 -04:00
.gitignore build: Remove Autotools-based build system 2024-08-30 21:31:39 +01:00
.python-version Bump .python-version from 3.9.17 to 3.9.18 2023-10-24 18:51:24 +02:00
.style.yapf Update .style.yapf 2023-06-01 23:35:10 +05:30
CMakeLists.txt cmake: Avoid hardcoding Qt's major version in Find module 2024-10-01 13:43:30 +01:00
CMakePresets.json build: Drop libnatpmp from build system 2024-09-30 11:37:55 +02:00
CONTRIBUTING.md doc: replace Autotools with CMake 2024-08-29 16:06:29 +01:00
COPYING doc: upgrade Bitcoin Core license to 2024 2024-01-10 16:29:01 -06:00
INSTALL.md doc: Added hyperlink for doc/build 2021-09-09 19:53:12 +05:30
libbitcoinkernel.pc.in build: Add a pkg-config file for libbitcoinkernel 2024-09-06 21:35:07 +02:00
README.md doc: Update for CMake-based build system 2024-08-16 21:24:08 +01:00
SECURITY.md Update security.md contact for achow101 2023-12-14 18:14:54 -05:00
vcpkg.json cmake: Add vcpkg manifest file 2024-08-16 21:19:12 +01:00

Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree

https://bitcoincore.org

For an immediately usable, binary version of the Bitcoin Core software, see https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/.

What is Bitcoin Core?

Bitcoin Core connects to the Bitcoin peer-to-peer network to download and fully validate blocks and transactions. It also includes a wallet and graphical user interface, which can be optionally built.

Further information about Bitcoin Core is available in the doc folder.

License

Bitcoin Core is released under the terms of the MIT license. See COPYING for more information or see https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT.

Development Process

The master branch is regularly built (see doc/build-*.md for instructions) and tested, but it is not guaranteed to be completely stable. Tags are created regularly from release branches to indicate new official, stable release versions of Bitcoin Core.

The https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui repository is used exclusively for the development of the GUI. Its master branch is identical in all monotree repositories. Release branches and tags do not exist, so please do not fork that repository unless it is for development reasons.

The contribution workflow is described in CONTRIBUTING.md and useful hints for developers can be found in doc/developer-notes.md.

Testing

Testing and code review is the bottleneck for development; we get more pull requests than we can review and test on short notice. Please be patient and help out by testing other people's pull requests, and remember this is a security-critical project where any mistake might cost people lots of money.

Automated Testing

Developers are strongly encouraged to write unit tests for new code, and to submit new unit tests for old code. Unit tests can be compiled and run (assuming they weren't disabled during the generation of the build system) with: ctest. Further details on running and extending unit tests can be found in /src/test/README.md.

There are also regression and integration tests, written in Python. These tests can be run (if the test dependencies are installed) with: test/functional/test_runner.py

The CI (Continuous Integration) systems make sure that every pull request is built for Windows, Linux, and macOS, and that unit/sanity tests are run automatically.

Manual Quality Assurance (QA) Testing

Changes should be tested by somebody other than the developer who wrote the code. This is especially important for large or high-risk changes. It is useful to add a test plan to the pull request description if testing the changes is not straightforward.

Translations

Changes to translations as well as new translations can be submitted to Bitcoin Core's Transifex page.

Translations are periodically pulled from Transifex and merged into the git repository. See the translation process for details on how this works.

Important: We do not accept translation changes as GitHub pull requests because the next pull from Transifex would automatically overwrite them again.