74507ce71e walletdb: Remove BerkeleyBatch friend class from BerkeleyDatabase (Andrew Chow)
00f0041351 No need to check for duplicate fileids in all dbenvs (Andrew Chow)
d86efab370 walletdb: Move Db->open to BerkeleyDatabase::Open (Andrew Chow)
4fe4b3bf1b walletdb: track database file use as m_refcount within BerkeleyDatabase (Andrew Chow)
65fb8807ac Combine BerkeleyEnvironment::Verify into BerkeleyDatabase::Verify (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
`BerkeleyBatch` and `BerkeleyDatabase` are kind of messy. The goal of this is to clean up them up so that they are logically separated.
`BerkeleyBatch` currently handles the creation of the `BerkeleyDatabase`'s `Db` handle. This is instead moved into `BerkeleyDatabase` and is called by `BerkeleyBatch`.
Instead of having `BerkeleyEnvironment` track each database's usage, have `BerkeleyDatabase` track this usage itself with the `m_refcount` variable that is present in `WalletDatabase`.
Lastly, instead of having each `BerkeleyEnvironment` store the fileids of the databases open in it, have a global `g_fileids` to track those fileids. We were already checking fileid uniqueness globally (by checking the fileids in every environment when opening a database) so it's cleaner to do this with a global variable.
All of these changes allow us to make `BerkeleyBatch` and `BerkeleyDatabase` no longer be friend classes.
The diff of this PR is currently the same as in ##18971
Requires #19334
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 74507ce71e
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 74507ce71e. No changes since last review other than rebase
Tree-SHA512: 845d84ee1a470e2bf5d2e2e3d7738183d8ce43ddd06a0bbd57edecf5779b2f55d70728b1b57f5daab0f078650a8d60c3e19dc30b75b36e7aa952ce268399d5f6
bcfebb6d55 net: save the network type explicitly in CNetAddr (Vasil Dimov)
100c64a95b net: document `enum Network` (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
(chopped off from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19031 to ease review)
Before this change, we would analyze the contents of `CNetAddr::ip[16]`
in order to tell which type is an address. Change this by introducing a
new member `CNetAddr::m_net` that explicitly tells the type of the
address.
This is necessary because in BIP155 we will not be able to tell the
address type by just looking at its raw representation (e.g. both TORv3
and I2P are "seemingly random" 32 bytes).
As a side effect of this change we no longer need to store IPv4
addresses encoded as IPv6 addresses - we can store them in proper 4
bytes (will be done in a separate commit). Also the code gets
somewhat simplified - instead of
`memcmp(ip, pchIPv4, sizeof(pchIPv4)) == 0` we can use
`m_net == NET_IPV4`.
ACKs for top commit:
troygiorshev:
reACK bcfebb6d55 via `git range-diff master 64897c5 bcfebb6`
jonatack:
re-ACK bcfebb6 per `git diff 662bb25 bcfebb6`, code review, debug build/tests clean, ran bitcoind.
laanwj:
Code review ACK bcfebb6d55
Tree-SHA512: 9347e2a50feac617a994bfb46a8f77e31c236bde882e4fd4f03eea4766cd5110216f5f3d24dee91d25218bab7f8bb6e1d2d6212a44db9e34594299fd6ff7606b
f19fdd47a6 test: add test for CChainState::ResizeCoinsCaches() (James O'Beirne)
8ac3ef4699 add ChainstateManager::MaybeRebalanceCaches() (James O'Beirne)
f36aaa6392 Add CChainState::ResizeCoinsCaches (James O'Beirne)
b223111da2 txdb: add CCoinsViewDB::ChangeCacheSize (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the [assumeutxo project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11):
Parent PR: #15606
Issue: #15605
Specification: https://github.com/jamesob/assumeutxo-docs/tree/master/proposal
---
In the assumeutxo implementation draft (#15056), once a UTXO snapshot is loaded, a new chainstate object is created after initialization. This means that we have to reclaim some of the cache that we've allocated to the original chainstate (per `dbcache=`) to repurpose for the snapshot chainstate.
Furthermore, it makes sense to have different cache allocations depending on which chainstate is more active. While the snapshot chainstate is working to get to the network tip (and the background validation chainstate is idle), it makes sense that the snapshot chainstate should have the majority of cache allocation. And contrariwise once the snapshot has reached network tip, most of the cache should be given to the background validation chainstate.
This set of changes (detailed in the commit messages) allows us to dynamically resize the various coins caches. None of the functionality introduced here is used at the moment, but will be in the next AU PR (which introduces `ActivateSnapshot`).
`ChainstateManager::MaybeRebalanceCaches()` defines the (somewhat normative) cache allocations between the snapshot and background validation chainstates. I'd be interested in feedback if anyone has thoughts on the proportions I've set there.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
weak utACK f19fdd47a6 -- didn't find any major problems, but not super confident that I didn't miss anything
fjahr:
Code review ACK f19fdd4
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK f19fdd47a6. Only change since last review is constructor cleanup (no change in behavior). I think the suggestions here from ajtowns and others are good, but shouldn't delay merging the PR (and hold up assumeutxo)
Tree-SHA512: fffb7847fb6993dd4a1a41cf11179b211b0b20b7eb5f7cf6266442136bfe9d43b830bbefcafd475bfd4af273f5573500594aa41fff03e0ed5c2a1e8562ff9269
a8865f8b72 [net processing] Tidy up Misbehaving() (John Newbery)
d15b3afb4c [net processing] Always supply debug message to Misbehaving() (John Newbery)
634144a1c2 [net processing] Fixup MaybeDiscourageAndDisconnect() style (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
This PR makes a few minor clean-ups to `Misbehaving()` in preparation to move it out of the cs_main lock.
There are very minor logging changes but otherwise no functional changes.
ACKs for top commit:
troygiorshev:
tACK a8865f8b72
jonatack:
ACK a8865f8
fjahr:
Code review ACK a8865f8b72
promag:
Code review ACK a8865f8b72.
Tree-SHA512: 98fb4f5f76399715545a1ea19290dcebfc8cb4eff72a1d3555dd3de6e184040bb8668c9651dab21db0dfd8e674e53a5977105ef76547146c9f6fa6b4b9d2ba59
fa5979d12f rpc: Avoid useless mempool query in gettxoutproof (MarcoFalke)
fa1f7f28cb rpc: Style fixups in gettxoutproof (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
`GetTransaction` implicitly and unconditionally asks the mempool global for a transaction. This is problematic for several reasons:
* `gettxoutproof` is for on-chain txs only and asking the mempool for on-chain txs is confusing and minimally wasteful
* Globals are confusing and make code harder to test with unit tests
Fix both issues by passing in an optional mempool. This also helps with #19556
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK fa5979d12f
jnewbery:
utACK fa5979d12f
promag:
Code review ACK fa5979d12f.
Tree-SHA512: 048361b82abfcc40481181bd44f70cfc9e97d5d6356549df34bbe30b9de7a0a72d2207a3ad0279b21f06293509b284d8967f58ca7e716263a22b20aa4e7f9c54
Before this change, we would analyze the contents of `CNetAddr::ip[16]`
in order to tell which type is an address. Change this by introducing a
new member `CNetAddr::m_net` that explicitly tells the type of the
address.
This is necessary because in BIP155 we will not be able to tell the
address type by just looking at its raw representation (e.g. both TORv3
and I2P are "seemingly random" 32 bytes).
As a side effect of this change we no longer need to store IPv4
addresses encoded as IPv6 addresses - we can store them in proper 4
bytes (will be done in a separate commit). Also the code gets
somewhat simplified - instead of
`memcmp(ip, pchIPv4, sizeof(pchIPv4)) == 0` we can use
`m_net == NET_IPV4`.
Co-authored-by: Carl Dong <contact@carldong.me>
fa2ae0ac8d span: Add Span::empty() and use it in script/descriptor (MarcoFalke)
fa8a992589 Work around memory-aliasing in descriptor ParsePubkey (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
While this is not undefined behaviour, the memory aliasing trick is confusing when reading the code. Having `a.size()==0` and then access `a[0]` works in this particular case, but should probably be avoided to harden the code for the future.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
re-ACK fa2ae0ac8d
elichai:
ACK fa2ae0ac8d
jonatack:
ACK fa2ae0ac8d
Tree-SHA512: 0ec7b09eef45504973a195923cdf1aa8522117c8e2f69b453e5ce9aa8a7e327c71138518022c32d05133dc99cb861101ed0f60fa891814ee3e9dab3a6fa61a84
- Make const things const.
- Replace conditional return with assert.
- Don't log the peer's IP address.
- Log the name Misbehaving directly instead of relying on __func__.
Misbehaving() could optionally take a debug string for printing to the
log file. Make this mandatory and always provide the string.
A couple of additional minor changes:
- remove the unnecessary forward declaration of Misbehaving()
- don't include the nodeid or newline in the passed debug message.
Misbehaving() adds these itself.
655b195747 [net processing] Continue SendMessages processing if not disconnecting peer (John Newbery)
a49781e56d [net processing] Only call MaybeDiscourageAndDisconnect from SendMessages (John Newbery)
a1d5a428a2 [net processing] Fix bad indentation in SendMessages() (John Newbery)
1a1c23f8d4 [net processing] Change cs_main TRY_LOCK to LOCK in SendMessages() (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
The motivation for this PR is to reduce the scope of cs_main locking in misbehavior logic. It is the first set of commits from a larger branch to move the misbehavior data out of CNodeState and into a new struct that doesn't take cs_main.
There are some very minor behavior changes in this branch, such as:
- Not checking for discouragement/disconnect in `ProcessMessages()` (and instead relying on the following check in `SendMessages()`)
- Checking for discouragement/disconnect as the first action in `SendMessages()` (and not doing ping message sending first)
- Continuing through `SendMessages()` if `MaybeDiscourageAndDisconnect()` doesn't disconnect the peer (rather than dropping out of `SendMessages()`
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
re-ACK 655b195 per `git range-diff 505b4ed f54af5e 655b195`, code/commit messages review, a bit of code history, and debug build.
MarcoFalke:
ACK 655b195747 only some style-nits 🚁
promag:
Code review ACK 655b195747.
ariard:
Code Review ACK 655b195
Tree-SHA512: fd6d7bc6bb789f5fb7771fb6a45f61a8faba32af93b766554f562144f9631d15c9cc849a383e71743ef73e610b4ee14853666f6fbf08a3ae35176d48c76c65d3
9c69cfe4c5 Add <datadir>/settings.json persistent settings storage. (Russell Yanofsky)
eb682c5700 util: Add ReadSettings and WriteSettings functions (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Persistent settings are used in followup PRs #15936 to unify gui settings between bitcoin-qt and bitcoind, and #15937 to add a load_on_startup flag to the loadwallet RPC and maintain a dynamic list of wallets that should be loaded on startup that also can be shared between bitcoind and bitcoin-qt.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
Approach re-ACK 9c69cfe4c5🌾
jnewbery:
utACK 9c69cfe4c5
Tree-SHA512: 39fcc6051717117c9141e934de1d0d3f739484be4685cdf97d54de967c8c816502b4fd0de12114433beaa5c5b7060c810fd8ae4e2b3ce7c371eb729ac01ba2e1
2aac093a3d test: Add test coverage for -networkactive option (Hennadii Stepanov)
3c58129b12 net: Log network activity status change unconditionally (Hennadii Stepanov)
62fe6aa87e net: Add -networkactive option (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Some Bitcoin Core activity is completely local (offline), e.g., reindexing.
The `setnetworkactive` RPC command is already present. This PR adds the corresponding command-line argument / config option, and allows to start the client with disabled p2p network by providing `-networkactive=0` or `-nonetworkactive`.
This was done while reviewing #16981.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 2aac093a3d🏠
LarryRuane:
ACK 2aac093a3d
Tree-SHA512: 446d791b46d7b556d7694df7b1f88cd4fbc09301fe4eaf036b45cb8166ed806156353cc03788a07b633d5887d5eee30a7c02a2d4307141c8ccc75e0a88145636
d416ae560e walletdb: Introduce WalletDatabase abstract class (Andrew Chow)
2179dbcbcd walletdb: Add BerkeleyDatabase::Open dummy function (Andrew Chow)
71d28e7cdc walletdb: Introduce AddRef and RemoveRef functions (Andrew Chow)
27b2766384 walletdb: Move BerkeleyDatabase::Flush(true) to Close() (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
A `WalletDatabase` abstract class is created from `BerkeleyDatabase` and is implemented by `BerkeleyDatabase`. First, to get to the point that this is possible, 4 functions need to be added to `BerkeleyDatabase`: `AddRef`, `RemoveRef`, `Open`, and `Close`.
First the increment and decrement of `mapFileUseCount` is refactored into separate functions `AddRef` and `RemoveRef`.
`Open` is introduced as a dummy function. This will raise an exception so that it always fails.
`Close` is refactored from `Flush`. The `shutdown` argument in `Flush` is removed and instead `Flush(true)` is now the `Close` function.
Split from #18971
Requires #19325
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK d416ae560e. Only changes since last review were rebasing after base PR #19334 merge, and adding cs_db lock in BerkeleyDatabase destructor, which should avoid races accessing env->m_databases and env->m_fileids
fjahr:
Code review ACK d416ae560e
meshcollider:
Code review & test run ACK d416ae560e
Tree-SHA512: 98d05ec093d7446c4488e2b0914584222a331e9a2f4d5be6af98e3f6d78fdd8e75526c12f91a8a52d4820c25bce02aa02aabe92d38bee7eb2fce07d0691b7b0d
The `setnetworkactive' RPC command is already present.
This new option allows to start the client with disabled p2p network
activity for testing or reindexing.
0a4f1422cd Further improve comments around recentRejects (Suhas Daftuar)
0e20cfedb7 Disconnect peers sending wtxidrelay message after VERACK (Suhas Daftuar)
cacd85209e test: Use wtxid relay generally in functional tests (Fabian Jahr)
8d8099e97a test: Add tests for wtxid tx relay in segwit test (Fabian Jahr)
9a5392fdf6 test: Update test framework p2p protocol version to 70016 (Fabian Jahr)
dd78d1d641 Rename AddInventoryKnown() to AddKnownTx() (Suhas Daftuar)
4eb515574e Make TX_WITNESS_STRIPPED its own rejection reason (Suhas Daftuar)
97141ca442 Delay getdata requests from peers using txid-based relay (Suhas Daftuar)
46d78d47de Add p2p message "wtxidrelay" (Suhas Daftuar)
2d282e0cba ignore non-wtxidrelay compliant invs (Anthony Towns)
ac88e2eb61 Add support for tx-relay via wtxid (Suhas Daftuar)
8e68fc246d Add wtxids to recentRejects instead of txids (Suhas Daftuar)
144c385820 Add wtxids of confirmed transactions to bloom filter (Suhas Daftuar)
85c78d54af Add wtxid-index to orphan map (Suhas Daftuar)
08b39955ec Add a wtxid-index to mapRelay (Suhas Daftuar)
60f0acda71 Just pass a hash to AddInventoryKnown (Suhas Daftuar)
c7eb6b4f1f Add wtxid to mempool unbroadcast tracking (Amiti Uttarwar)
2b4b90aa8f Add a wtxid-index to the mempool (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
Using txids (a transaction's hash, without witness) for transaction relay is problematic, post-segwit -- if a peer gives us a segwit transaction that fails policy checks, it could be because the txid associated with the transaction is definitely unacceptable to our node (regardless of the witness), or it could be that the transaction was malleated and with a different witness, the txid could be accepted to our mempool.
We have a bloom filter of recently rejected transactions, whose purpose is to help us avoid redownloading and revalidating transactions that fail to be accepted, but because of this potential for witness malleability to interfere with relay of valid transactions, we do not use the filter for segwit transactions. This issue is discussed at some length in #8279. The effect of this is that whenever a segwit transaction that fails policy checks is relayed, a node would download that transaction from every peer announcing it, because it has no way presently to cache failure. Historically this hasn't been a big problem, but if/when policy for accepting segwit transactions were to change (eg taproot, or any other change), we could expect older nodes talking to newer nodes to be wasting bandwidth because of this.
As discussed in that issue, switching to wtxid-based relay solves this problem -- by using an identifier for a transaction that commits to all the data in our relay protocol, we can be certain if a transaction that a peer is announcing is one that we've already tried to process, or if it's something new. This PR introduces support for wtxid-based relay with peers that support it (and remains backwards compatible with peers that use txids for relay, of course).
Apart from code correctness, one issue to be aware of is that by downloading from old and new peers alike, we should expect there to be some bandwidth wasted, because sometimes we might download the same transaction via txid-relay as well as wtxid-relay. The last commit in this PR implements a heuristic I want to analyze, which is to just delay relay from txid-relay peers by 2 seconds, if we have at least 1 wtxid-based peer. I've just started running a couple nodes with this heuristic so I can measure how well it works, but I'm open to other ideas for minimizing that issue. In the long run, I think this will be essentially a non-issue, so I don't think it's too big a concern, we just need to bite the bullet and deal with it during upgrade.
Finally, this proposal would need a simple BIP describing the changes, which I haven't yet drafted. However, review and testing of this code in the interim would be welcome.
To do items:
- [x] Write BIP explaining the spec here (1 new p2p message for negotiating wtxid-based relay, along with a new INV type)
- [ ] Measure and evaluate a heuristic for minimizing how often a node downloads the same transaction twice, when connected to old and new nodes.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
utACK 0a4f1422cd
laanwj:
utACK 0a4f1422cd
Tree-SHA512: d8eb8f0688cf0cbe9507bf738e143edab1f595551fdfeddc2b6734686ea26e7f156b6bfde38bad8bbbe8bec1857c7223e1687f8f018de7463dde8ecaa8f450df
fa56eda58e log: Avoid treating remote misbehvior as local system error (MarcoFalke)
fa492895b5 refactor: Switch ValidationState mode to C++11 enum class (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
When logging failures of `CheckBlockHeader` (high-hash), they are always logged as system error. This is problematic for several reasons:
* Submitting a blockheader that fails `CheckBlockHeader` over RPC will result in a debug log line that starts with `ERROR`. Proper behaviour should be to log not anything and instead only return the failure reason to the RPC user. This pull does not fix this issue entirely, but is a good first step in the right direction.
* A misbehaving peer that sends us an invalid block header that fails `CheckBlockHeader` will result in a debug log line that starts with `ERROR`. Proper behavior should be to log the remote peer misbehavior if logging for that category was enabled. This pull fixes this issue for `CheckBlockHeader` and other functions can be adjusted as well if needed in follow-ups. This should be a good first step in the right direction.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
re-ACK fa56eda58e
Tree-SHA512: 9793191f5cb57bdff7c93926e94877e8ca2ef89dcebcf9eb155899c733961839ec7c3f9b9f001dc082ada4234fe6e75f6df431301678d6822325840771166d77
1554b54d47 Static asserts for consistency of fee defaults. (Daniel Kraft)
Pull request description:
This adds `static_assert`'s that ensure that the default values given for fee levels in the wallet (minimum fee and incremental feerate increase) are at least as high as the corresponding levels configured in the core node policy. Since the core policy values are enforced by the network, it makes sense for the wallet to be conservative and above (or at least not below) this.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
code review ACK 1554b54d47, these assumptions seem straightforward
Tree-SHA512: 50e5adf082f467062334377f82a3ee75bcfd436afc65bd0eb33c8d0549d6d90fd1f48c31f60cabe523eb59be9efa8ae0879e9e09cd51ca9c1bd466631ce03cf4
c8992e8959 test: Fix fuzzer compilation on macOS fixes#19557 (freenancial)
Pull request description:
fixes#19557
Before the fix:
```
➜ bitcoin git:(fix-fuzzer-macos) make
Making all in src
CXX test/fuzz/addition_overflow-addition_overflow.o
In file included from test/fuzz/addition_overflow.cpp:7:
./test/fuzz/util.h:335:13: error: no matching function for call to 'AdditionOverflow'
if (AdditionOverflow((uint64_t)fuzzed_file->m_offset, random_bytes.size())) {
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./test/fuzz/util.h:201:16: note: candidate template ignored: deduced conflicting types for parameter 'T' ('unsigned long long' vs. 'unsigned long')
NODISCARD bool AdditionOverflow(const T i, const T j) noexcept
^
./test/fuzz/util.h:346:13: error: no matching function for call to 'AdditionOverflow'
if (AdditionOverflow(fuzzed_file->m_offset, n)) {
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./test/fuzz/util.h:201:16: note: candidate template ignored: deduced conflicting types for parameter 'T' ('long long' vs. 'long')
NODISCARD bool AdditionOverflow(const T i, const T j) noexcept
^
```
After the fix:
```
➜ bitcoin git:(fix-fuzzer-macos) ./configure --enable-fuzz --with-sanitizers=fuzzer,address,undefined CC=/usr/local/opt/llvm/bin/clang CXX=/usr/local/opt/llvm/bin/clang++ --disable-asm && make clean && make -j5
...
...
CXXLD test/fuzz/uint256_deserialize
Making all in doc/man
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'.
```
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK c8992e8959 - tested that compiling works on macOS.
MarcoFalke:
review ACK c8992e8959
Tree-SHA512: 965cdc61b30db0e2209c91b29f0d42de927a9a5b85e1e70f22d1452e0955f876726c7a8c1d1a5f448f12bf24eec3000802071cd4ae28d8605343fd43d174ca84
c0f09c2c9d fuzz: add missing overrides to signature_checker (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
These functions in `fuzz/signature_checker.cpp` override virtual member functions and should be marked `override` instead of `virtual`, which is for introducing a new virtual function. The overridden virtual functions are in `script/interpreter.h:151/156/161`.
Also, per MarcoFalke suggestion, add missing parentheses in `fuzz/scriptnum_ops.cpp` and remove useless `unsigned int >= 0` conditional in `fuzz/script.cpp`.
These changes fix 5 compile warnings in gcc 10 and 3 in clang 11/12.
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
ACK c0f09c2
MarcoFalke:
review ACK c0f09c2c9d
Tree-SHA512: 76ce73ec577c1f23cf8646c31d44dcd6c6303732c47187d041a8921d0d24a50163989a375352ebc221abf2ac337bc0902149be46b6f9eebc071d2f364c407f71
d0ea9bab28 walletdb: Don't remove database transaction logs and instead error (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Instead of removing the database transaction logs and retrying the
wallet loading, just return an error message to the user. Additionally,
speciically for DB_RUNRECOVERY, notify the user that this could be due
to different BDB versions.
Kind of implements the suggestion from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18870#discussion_r421647964
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-utACK d0ea9bab28
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK d0ea9bab28. Only changes since last review are rebase and expanding error and commit messages.
Tree-SHA512: f6e67dc70f58188742a5c8af7cdc63a2b58779aa0d26ae7f1e75805a239f1a342433860e5a238d6577fae5ab04b9d15e7f11c55b867065dfd13781a6a62e4958
and also
- add missing parentheses in fuzz/scriptnum_ops.cpp
- remove useless unsigned int conditional in fuzz/script.cpp
These changes fix 5 compile warnings in gcc 10.
ec4c6a17e8 scripted-diff: replace MAX_BLOCKS_ONLY_CONNECTIONS with MAX_BLOCK_RELAY_ONLY_CONNECTIONS (glowang)
Pull request description:
We have two different concepts that have similar names: `-blocksonly` and `block-relay-only`, and the similarity of names could lead to confusion. `-blocksonly` disables all local receiving & relaying of transactions (with a few exceptions), while `block-relay-only`means that bitcoind will make 2 additional outbound connections that are only used for block relay.
In net.h and init.cpp, `MAX_BLOCKS_ONLY_CONNECTIONS` is used to represent the maximum number of `block-relay-only` outbound peers, which is 2. But this name sounds ambiguous, and I proposed a better name, `MAX_BLOCK_RELAY_ONLY_CONNECTION`.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK ec4c6a17e8
Tree-SHA512: cfa592a7ff936f14d10cfc1e926a51b82bc0feaf104885a41ca8111b906cb3d1ec5536bab143a3cfca70aa49e9575c6995941eb6d3d7f4018d4535712342f155
5fa067a27d Remove unnecessary blockfile SetPos (Tom Harding)
Pull request description:
Nothing could have changed the position since we retrieved it a few statements earlier. This dates from commit 16d5194165.
ACKs for top commit:
LarryRuane:
ACK 5fa067a27d
Tree-SHA512: 459cc7226e186c231ffb67f0613f550e8eb940f1b8933c3bc4a4e8dd519c8d5d45884e8cfd9347039dab90a093644bbbb31be063baed1c6fc7984b6cb4f17c9f
4455949d6f Make test DoS_mapOrphans deterministic (David Reikher)
Pull request description:
This pull request proposes a solution to make the test `DoS_mapOrphans` in denialofservice_tests.cpp have deterministic coverage.
The `RandomOrphan` function in denialofservice_tests.cpp and the implicitly called function `ecdsa_signature_parse_der_lax` in pubkey.cpp were causing the non-deterministic test coverage.
In the former, if a random orphan was selected the index of which is bigger than the max. orphan index in `mapOrphanTransactions`, the last orphan was returned from `RandomOrphan`. If the random number generated was never large enough, this condition would not be fulfilled and the corresponding branch wouldn't run. The proposed solution is to force one of the 50 dependant orphans to depend on the last orphan in `mapOrphanTransactions` using the newly introduced function `OrphanByIndex` (and passing it a large uint256), forcing this branch to run at least once.
In the latter, if values for ECDSA `R` or `S` (or both) had no leading zeros, some code would not be executed. The solution was to find a constant signature that would be comprised of `R` and `S` values with leading zeros and calling `CPubKey::Verify` at the end of the test with this signature forcing this code to always run at least once at the end even if it hadn't throughout the test.
To test that the coverage is (at least highly likely) deterministic, I ran
`contrib/devtools/test_deterministic_coverage.sh denialofservice_tests/DoS_mapOrphans 1000`
and the result was deterministic coverage across 1000 runs.
Also - removed denialofservice_tests test entry from the list of non-deterministic tests in the coverage script.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 4455949d6f
Tree-SHA512: 987eb1f94b80d5bec4d4944e91ef43b9b8603055750362d4b4665b7f011be27045808aa9f4c6ccf8ae009b61405f9a1b8671d65a843c3328e5b8acce1f1c00a6
The RandomOrphan function and the function ecdsa_signature_parse_der_lax
in pubkey.cpp were causing non-deterministic test coverage.
Force seed in the beginning of the test to make it deterministic.
The seed is selected carefully so that all branches of the function
ecdsa_signature_parse_der_lax are executed. Prior to this fix, the test
was exhibiting non-deterministic coverage since none of the ECDSA
signatures that were generated during the test had leading zeroes in
either R, S, or both, resulting in some branches of said function not
being executed. The seed ensures that both conditions are hit.
Removed denialofservice_tests test entry from the list of non-deterministic
tests in the coverage script.
Previously, TX_WITNESS_MUTATED could be returned during transaction validation
for either transactions that had a witness that was non-standard, or for
transactions that had no witness but were invalid due to segwit validation
rules.
However, for txid/wtxid-relay considerations, net_processing distinguishes the
witness stripped case separately, because it affects whether a wtxid should be
able to be added to the reject filter. It is safe to add the wtxid of a
witness-mutated transaction to the filter (as that wtxid shouldn't collide with
the txid, and hence it wouldn't interfere with transaction relay from
txid-relay peers), but it is not safe to add the wtxid (== txid) of a
witness-stripped transaction to the filter, because that would interfere with
relay of another transaction with the same txid (but different wtxid) when
relaying from txid-relay peers.
Also updates the comment explaining this logic, and explaining that we can get
rid of this complexity once there's a sufficient deployment of wtxid-relaying
peers on the network.
Using both txid and wtxid-based relay with peers means that we could sometimes
download the same transaction twice, if announced via two different hashes from
different peers.
Use a heuristic of delaying txid-peer-getdata requests by 2 seconds, if we have
at least one wtxid-based peer.
This adds a field to CNodeState that tracks whether to relay transactions with
that peer via wtxid, instead of txid. As of this commit the field will always
be false, but in a later commit we will add a way to negotiate turning this on
via p2p messages exchanged with the peer.
Previously, we only added txids to recentRejects if we were sure that the
transaction couldn't have had the wrong witness (either because the witness was
malleated or stripped).
In preparation for wtxid-based relay, we can observe that txid == wtxid for
transactions that have no witness, and add the wtxid of rejected transactions,
provided the transaction wasn't a witness-stripped one. This means that we now
add more data to the filter (as prior to this commit, any transaction with a
witness that failed to be accepted was being skipped for inclusion in the
filter) but witness malleation should still not interfere with relay of a valid
segwit transaction, because the txid of a segwit transaction would not be added
to the filter after failing validation.
In the future, having wtxids in the recent rejects filter will allow us to
skip downloading the same wtxid multiple times, once our peers use wtxids for
transaction relay.
This is in preparation for wtxid-based invs (we need to be able to tell whether
we AlreadyHave() a transaction based on either txid or wtxid).
This also double the size of the bloom filter, which is overkill, but still
uses a manageable amount of memory.
