6ed424f2db wallet: fix, detect blank legacy wallets in IsLegacy (furszy)
Pull request description:
Blank legacy wallets do not have active SPKM. They can only be
detected by checking the descriptors' flag or the db format.
This enables the migration of blank legacy wallets in the GUI.
To test this:
1) Create a blank legacy wallet.
2) Try to migrate it using the GUI's toolbar "Migrate Wallet" button.
-> In master: The button will be disabled because `CWallet::IsLegacy()` returns false for blank legacy wallet.
-> In this PR: the button will be enabled, allowing the migration of legacy wallets.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 6ed424f2db
tdb3:
ACK 6ed424f2db
glozow:
ACK 6ed424f2db
Tree-SHA512: c06c4c4c2e546ccb033287b9aa3aee4ca36b47aeb2fac6fbed5de774b65caef9c818fc8dfdaac6ce78839b2d5d642a5632a5b44c5e889ea169ced80ed50501a7
faa1b9b0e6 test: add functional test for XORed block/undo files (`-blocksxor`) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
6b3676be3e test: refactor: move `read_xor_key`/`util_xor` helpers to util module (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a dedicated functional test for XORed block data/undo file support (bitcoind option `-blocksxor`, see PR #28052). In order to verify that the XOR pattern has been applied, the {blk,rev}*.dat files are rewritten un-XORed manually by the test while the node is shut down; the node is then started again with `-blocksxor=0`, and both the data and undo files are verified via the `verifychain` RPC (with checklevel=2). Note that starting bitcoind with `-blocksxor=0` fails if a xor key is present already, which is also tested explicitly.
Fixes#30599.
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
ACK faa1b9b0e6
maflcko:
ACK faa1b9b0e6
ismaelsadeeq:
Tested ACK faa1b9b0e6
Tree-SHA512: e1df106f6b4e3ba67eca108e36d762f1b991673b881934b84cd36946496a09ce9c329c1363c36aa29409137ae4881e2d177e651359686511632ddf2870f7ca8e
f550a8e035 Rename ReleaseWallet to FlushAndDeleteWallet (furszy)
64e736d79e wallet: WaitForDeleteWallet, do not expect thread safety (Ryan Ofsky)
8872b4a6ca wallet: rename UnloadWallet to WaitForDeleteWallet (furszy)
5d15485aaf wallet: unload, notify GUI as soon as possible (furszy)
Pull request description:
Coming from #29073.
Applied ryanofsky suggested changes on https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29073#issuecomment-2274237242 with few modifications coming from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18338#issuecomment-605060348.
The only point I did not tackle from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18338#issuecomment-605060348 is:
> * Move log print and flush out of ReleaseWallet into CWallet destructor
Because it would mean every `CWallet` object would flush data to disk during destruction. Which is not necessary for wallet tool utilities and unit tests.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK f550a8e035
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK f550a8e035. Just a simple rename since last review
ismaelsadeeq:
Re-ACK f550a8e035
Tree-SHA512: e2eb69bf36883c514f601f4838ae6a41113996b9559abf8dc2b46e16bbcdad401195ac0f2b9d1fb55a10e78bb8ea9953788a168c80474e3f101350d208cb3bd2
1610643c8b chainparams: add mainnet assumeutxo param at height 840_000 (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
This adds snapshot parameters for mainnet block 840,000.
You can generate the snapshot yourself using `./contrib/devtools/utxo_snapshot.sh` or download my torrent:
* torrent: `magnet:?xt=urn:btih:596c26cc709e213fdfec997183ff67067241440c&dn=utxo-840000.dat&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.bitcoin.sprovoost.nl%3A6969`
It would be a good idea to test:
1. That you can produce the same snapshot file, sha256 sum:
```
dc4bb43d58d6a25e91eae93eb052d72e3318bd98ec62a5d0c11817cefbba177b utxo-840000.dat
```
2. That the snapshot works
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
re-ACK 1610643c8b
achow101:
ACK 1610643c8b
theStack:
Tested ACK 1610643c8b
mzumsande:
tested ACK 1610643c8b
willcl-ark:
tACK 1610643c8b
Tree-SHA512: 581d8e86379bb044324f04f8559dd0a8946b6e2b145d5f25b38727b30b8cf13d6ac3c8777ff06554d3cf1a072809f7b5fbd693239868578f25dceafe5ba5f57c
9b29755520 Deduplicate list of chain strings in RPC help texts (Martin Saposnic)
Pull request description:
As mentioned in issue https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/30645:
Many command line parameter and RPC help texts currently contain the list of chain/network names hardcoded ("main, test, testnet4, signet, regtest"), which is error-prone as it can easily happen to miss an instance if the list ever changes again.
This PR deduplicates the list of possible chain/network strings in RPC/parameter help texts, and it creates a macro `LIST_CHAIN_NAMES` in src/chainparamsbase.h. In the future, there is only 1 place where that list of possible values lives, so maintainability is improved and errors are avoided.
All three places where this change impacts:
```
./bitcoin-cli --help
./bitcoin-cli help getblockchaininfo
./bitcoin-cli help getmininginfo
```
They all return the correct string `"main, test, testnet4, signet, regtest"`
See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30642#discussion_r1714711575
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 9b29755520
achow101:
ACK 9b29755520
MarnixCroes:
ACK 9b29755520
theStack:
ACK 9b29755520
danielabrozzoni:
ACK 9b29755520
Tree-SHA512: 1e961bcbe40b0f17a87a2437eb4ba1bb89468fd1b5a39599d72a00ef75cb4009e7d2f05d0a621bb904fecf681c55b8a219fcfe4d44d5d27f27cdda20882b1323
770b0348c0 qt: Update translation source file for v28.0 string freeze (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR updates the `src/qt/locale/bitcoin_en.xlf` translation source file according to the [Release schedule for 28.0](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29891).
Note for reviewers: it is expected to get a zero diff after running `make -C src translate` locally.
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
re-ACK 770b0348c0
pablomartin4btc:
re-ACK 770b0348c0
Tree-SHA512: 11dd26c470411aefc2e4f897c605162027a00e2a0ab1dcec9a1784c053349a3feaeedda7b649476ff528231801629e0ef342a48430ef54a4ec75ac1548c56d4f
8f2522d242 gui: Use menu for wallet migration (Ava Chow)
d56a450bf5 gui: Use wallet name for wallet migration rather than WalletModel (Ava Chow)
c3918583dd gui: don't remove wallet manually before migration (furszy)
bfba63880f gui: Consolidate wallet display name to GUIUtil function (Ava Chow)
28fc562f26 wallet, interfaces: Include database format in listWalletDir (Ava Chow)
Pull request description:
Currently the Migrate Wallet menu item can only be used to migrate the currently loaded wallet. This is not suitable for the future when legacy wallets can no longer be loaded at all, but should still be able to be migrated. This PR changes that menu item into a menu list like Open Wallet and lets users migrate any legacy wallet in their wallet directory regardless of the wallets loaded.
One issue I ran into was dealing with encrypted wallets. Ideally, we would detect whether a wallet is encrypted, and prompt the user for their passphrase at that time. However, that's actually difficult to do in the GUI since migration will unload the wallet if it was already loaded, and reload it without connecting it to any signals or interfaces. Only then can it detect whether a wallet is encrypted, but then there is no `WalletModel` or even an `interfaces::Wallet` that the GUI could use to unlock it via a callback.
To deal with this, I've opted to just add a button to the migration dialog box that has the user enter their passphrase first, along with instructional text to use that button if their wallet was encrypted. If the user enters the wrong passphrase or clicked the other button that does not prompt for the passphrase, migration will fail with a message indicating that the passphrase was incorrect.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 8f2522d242.
furszy:
ACK 8f2522d
Tree-SHA512: a0e3b70dbfcacb89617956510ebcea94cad8617a987c68fe39fa16ac1721190b7cf7afc156c39b9032920cfb67b5d4ca28791681f5021d92d16acc691387afa1
Once legacy wallets can no longer be loaded, we need to be able to
migrate them without loading. Thus we should use a menu that lists the
wallets in the wallet directory instead of an action which migrates the
currently loaded wallet.
To prepare for migrating wallets that are not loaded, when migration
occurs in the GUI, it should not rely on a WalletModel existing.
Co-authored-by: furszy <matiasfurszyfer@protonmail.com>
fa6fe43207 net: Clarify that m_addr_local is only set once (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The function is supposed to be only called once when the version msg arrives (a single time). Calling it twice would be an internal logic bug. However, the `LogError` in this function has many issues:
* If the error happens in tests, as is the case for the buggy fuzz test, it will go unnoticed
* It is dead code, unless a bug is introduced to execute it
Fix all issues by using `Assume(!m_addr_local.IsValid())` instead. Idea taken from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30364#discussion_r1680530382
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fa6fe43207
mzumsande:
utACK fa6fe43207
glozow:
ACK fa6fe43207
Tree-SHA512: 8c1e8c524768f4f36cc50110ae54ee423e057a963ff78f736f3bf92df1ce5af28e3e0149153780897944e1d5c22ddbca9dac9865d9f4d44afffa152bc8559405
Blank legacy wallets do not have active SPKM. They can
only be detected by checking the descriptors' flag or
the db format.
This enables the migration of blank legacy wallets in
the GUI.
The following bitcoind parameters / RPC calls missed the "testnet4"
network string:
- `-chain=` parameter
- `getblockchaininfo` RPC, "chain" result
- `getmininginfo` RPC, "chain" result
5215c925d1 Compare ASMaps with respect to specific addresses (virtu)
Pull request description:
Right now, we have no way to quantify the "degradation" of an ASMap over time in the context of Bitcoin's P2P network in a meaningful way. However, such data would be useful for:
1. Making sure the minimum shelf life of ASMaps is compatible with the release cycle (we wouldn't want to start shipping ASMaps with releases before making sure ASMaps typically do not become obsolete before the time of the next release)
2. Node operators eager to keep their ASMaps up-to-date between releases.
While `asmap-tool.py` has a `diff` command to perform a prefix-based comparison of two ASMaps, it is hard to reason about whether an old ASMap still is "good enough" or should be replaced with a newer one based on a prefix-based diff such as the following:
```shell
$ ./asmap-tool.py diff 1704463200_asmap.dat 1710770400_asmap.dat
[...]
# 2c0f:fc98::/32 was AS37282
# 2c0f:fcb8::/32 was AS37323
2c0f:ff18::/32 AS37044 # was unassigned
2c0f:ff98::/32 AS37113 # was unassigned
2c0f:ffa0::/32 AS37273 # was unassigned
# 76082350 (2^26.18) IPv4 addresses changed; 834271985742505274886878979424260 (2^109.36) IPv6 addresses changed
```
One option for a more Bitcoin-centric ASMap comparison comprises comparing ASNs for the addresses of Bitcoin nodes and reporting on the number/share of addresses of nodes with disagreeing ASNs. By applying this approach to a node's set of known peers, a node operator can estimate how many of the node's peers are mapped to out-of-date AS when using the currently deployed and an up-to-date ASMap as input.
This PR adds this functionality to `asmap-tool.py` by introducing a `diff_addrs` subcommand. In addition to two ASMaps, the subcommand reads addresses from a (`getnodeaddresses`-compatible) file, and computes statistics for those addresses:
```bash
$ ./asmap-tool.py diff_addrs 1704463200_asmap.dat 1710770400_asmap.dat <(bitcoin-cli getnodeaddresses 0)
275 address(es) reassigned from unassigned to AS51167
84 address(es) reassigned from AS198949 to AS15557
66 address(es) reassigned from AS45758 to AS45629
33 address(es) reassigned from AS174 to AS212238
[...]
1 address(es) reassigned from unassigned to AS399619
Summary: 919 (1.67%) of 54,901 addresses were reassigned.
```
When the `-s / --show-addresses` flag is used, addresses subject to reassignment are included in the output.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
tACK 5215c925d1
achow101:
ACK 5215c925d1
brunoerg:
reACK 5215c925d1
Tree-SHA512: ebcf47754bce92794fad9f4c3bfc1c5e9daf077db5975f444c5135092eb6a26ecaa1eca6748a03ae0c87d9e45532426966fe8f3c17249b17f9dcad490d6dd3bf
86b38529d5 qa: a fuzz target for the block index database (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
This introduces a small fuzz target for `CBlockTreeDB` which asserts a few invariants by using an in-memory LevelDb.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 86b38529d5
TheCharlatan:
Re-ACK 86b38529d5
maflcko:
review ACK 86b38529d5🥒
brunoerg:
utACK 86b38529d5
Tree-SHA512: ab75b4ae1c7e0a4b15f8a6ceffdf509fbc79833e6ea073ecef68558d53b83663d1b30362aaa2d77c22b8890a572f5b1d4b1c5abbca483c8c8f9b1fb5b276a59a
8fee5355ee guix: fix suggested fake date for openssl -1.1.1l (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Using `2020-10-01` as the fake timestamp will cause many test failures with `/gnu/store/bfirgq65ndhf63nn4q6vlkbha9zd931q-openssl-1.1.1l.drv`. I didn't investigate why, but I guess because it's _before_ the test certificates were created. They expired in June 2022. I tried a month before that, which worked.
Also fixes layout of instructions.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 8fee5355ee
maflcko:
review ACK 8fee5355ee
Tree-SHA512: df5dd3aa961e25bd57d0b8b73daeb3ec76856b06e35277f24b6b19be81774512228f75e2b779afa8ea92fcc39beb869f43e0c57fba19ad16a82812e7c0bea38b
