7e36dca657 test: add test for modififed walletprocesspsbt calls (willcl-ark)
39cea21ec5 wallet: fix FillPSBT errantly showing as complete (willcl-ark)
Pull request description:
Fixes: #30077
Fix cases of calls to `FillPSBT` returning `complete=true` when it's not
the case.
This can happen when some inputs have been signed but the transaction is
subsequently modified, e.g. in the context of PayJoins.
Also fixes a related bug where a finalized hex string is attempted to be
added during `walletprocesspsbt` but a CHECK_NONFATAL causes an abort.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 7e36dca657
ismaelsadeeq:
Tested ACK 7e36dca657
pinheadmz:
re-ACK 7e36dca657
Tree-SHA512: e35d19789899c543866d86d513506494d672e4bed9aa36a995dbec4e72f0a8ec5536b57c4a940a18002ae4a8efd0b007c77ba64e57cd52af98e4ac0e7bf650d6
In CMake-based build system (1) `config.ini` is created in the build
directory, and (2) `cache` must also be created in the same directory.
This change enables running individual functional tests from the build
directory.
bca346a970 net: require P2P binds to succeed (Vasil Dimov)
af552534ab net: report an error if unable to bind on the Tor listening addr:port (Vasil Dimov)
9a7e5f4d68 net: don't extra bind for Tor if binds are restricted (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
Make it possible to disable the Tor binding on `127.0.0.1:8334` and stop startup if any P2P bind fails instead of "if all P2P binds fail".
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22726
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22727
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK bca346a970
cbergqvist:
ACK bca346a970
pinheadmz:
ACK bca346a970
Tree-SHA512: fabef89a957191eea4f3e3b6109d2b8389f27ecc74440a920b0c10f31fff00a85bcfd1eb3c91826c7169c618f4de8a8d0a260e2caf40fd854f07ea9a980d8603
16bd283b3a Reapply "test: p2p: check that connecting to ourself leads to disconnect" (Sebastian Falbesoner)
0dbcd4c148 net: prevent sending messages in `NetEventsInterface::InitializeNode` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
66673f1c13 net: fix race condition in self-connect detection (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR fixes a recently discovered race condition in the self-connect detection (see #30362 and #30368).
Initiating an outbound network connection currently involves the following steps after the socket connection is established (see [`CConnman::OpenNetworkConnection`](bd5d1688b4/src/net.cpp (L2923-L2930)) method):
1. set up node state
2. queue VERSION message (both steps 1 and 2 happen in [`InitializeNode`](bd5d1688b4/src/net_processing.cpp (L1662-L1683)))
3. add new node to vector `m_nodes`
If we connect to ourself, it can happen that the sent VERSION message (step 2) is received and processed locally *before* the node object is added to the connection manager's `m_nodes` vector (step 3). In this case, the self-connect remains undiscovered, as the detection doesn't find the outbound peer in `m_nodes` yet (see `CConnman::CheckIncomingNonce`).
Fix this by swapping the order of 2. and 3., by taking the `PushNodeVersion` call out of `InitializeNode` and doing that in the `SendMessages` method instead, which is only called for `CNode` instances in `m_nodes`.
The temporarily reverted test introduced in #30362 is readded. Fixes#30368.
Thanks go to vasild, mzumsande and dergoegge for suggestions on how to fix this (see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/30368#issuecomment-2200625017 ff. and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30394#discussion_r1668290789).
ACKs for top commit:
naiyoma:
tested ACK [16bd283b3a), built and tested locally, test passes successfully.
mzumsande:
ACK 16bd283b3a
tdb3:
ACK 16bd283b3a
glozow:
ACK 16bd283b3a
dergoegge:
ACK 16bd283b3a
Tree-SHA512: 5b8aced6cda8deb38d4cd3fe4980b8af505d37ffa0925afaa734c5d81efe9d490dc48a42e1d0d45dd2961c0e1172a3d5b6582ae9a2d642f2592a17fbdc184445
c6d43367a1 test: Fix intermittent failure in p2p_v2_misbehaving.py (stratospher)
Pull request description:
Fixes#30419.
Make sure that ellswift computation is complete in the `NetworkThread` in `test/functional/p2p_v2_misbehaving.py` before sending the ellswift in the `MainThread`.
One way to reproduce this failure on master would be:
```diff
diff --git a/test/functional/test_framework/v2_p2p.py b/test/functional/test_framework/v2_p2p.py
index 87600c36de..ea0615ef3b 100644
--- a/test/functional/test_framework/v2_p2p.py
+++ b/test/functional/test_framework/v2_p2p.py
@@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ class EncryptedP2PState:
def generate_keypair_and_garbage(self, garbage_len=None):
"""Generates ellswift keypair and 4095 bytes garbage at max"""
+ import time; time.sleep(3)
self.privkey_ours, self.ellswift_ours = ellswift_create()
if garbage_len is None:
garbage_len = random.randrange(MAX_GARBAGE_LEN + 1)
```
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
ACK c6d43367a1
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK c6d43367a1
tdb3:
cr and t ACK c6d43367a1
Tree-SHA512: dfc3a6afa09773b7e84d35aff0aa14e0b8a4475860e0b31ab5c1a8d54911c814f07138f624fea651fba90cc5c526c0d05c3fe33d2ce0ad833b2be3a3caa9f522
The ellswift bytes are computed in the NetworkThread and sent in
the MainThread. Add a `wait_until()` to make sure that ellswift
computation is completed in NetworkThread before sending it in
the MainThread. Also wait until bytes sent are actually received
and use mocktime for more robust disconnection checking.
00b8e26bd6 test: fix inconsistency in fundrawtransaction weight limits test (furszy)
Pull request description:
Fix https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30309#discussion_r1657628378 inconsistency.
Currently, the test is passing due to a mistake in the test inputs
selection process. We are selecting the parent transaction change
output as one of the inputs of the transaction to fund, which
helps to surpass the target amount when it shouldn't due to the
fee reduction.
The failure arises when the test behaves as intended by its coder;
that is, when it does not select the change output. In this case,
the pre-selected inputs aren't enough to cover the target amount.
Fix this by excluding the parent transaction's change output from
the inputs selection and including an extra input to cover the tx
fee.
The CI failure can be replicated with the following patch in master:
```diff
diff --git a/test/functional/wallet_fundrawtransaction.py b/test/functional/wallet_fundrawtransaction.py
--- a/test/functional/wallet_fundrawtransaction.py(revision 9b480f7a25)
+++ b/test/functional/wallet_fundrawtransaction.py(date 1720652934739)
@@ -1322,7 +1322,7 @@
outputs = []
for _ in range(1472):
outputs.append({wallet.getnewaddress(address_type="legacy"): 0.1})
- txid = self.nodes[0].send(outputs=outputs)["txid"]
+ txid = self.nodes[0].send(outputs=outputs, change_position=0)["txid"]
self.generate(self.nodes[0], 1)
# 272 WU per input (273 when high-s); picking 1471 inputs will exceed the max standard tx weight.
@@ -1330,7 +1330,7 @@
# 1) Try to fund transaction only using the preset inputs
input_weights = []
- for i in range(1471):
+ for i in range(1, 1472): # skip first output as it is the parent tx change output
input_weights.append({"txid": txid, "vout": i, "weight": 273})
assert_raises_rpc_error(-4, "Transaction too large", wallet.fundrawtransaction, hexstring=rawtx, input_weights=input_weights)
```
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 00b8e26bd6
ismaelsadeeq:
Code review and Tested ACK 00b8e26bd6
Tree-SHA512: 5ef792961b7fad4999fc30aa03366432103ddf672ca5cbb366c9eab4c2e46d5ae1ab0c073dfc4fbb2b4e63203653bc0e54463c731c5f8655140207ba5f8e542e
If the snapshot is not an ancestor of the most-work header (m_best_header),
syncing from that alternative chain should be prioritised.
Therefore don't accept loading a snapshot in this situation.
If that other chain turns out to be invalid, m_best_header
would be reset and loading the snapshot should be possible again.
Because of the work required to generate a conflicting headers chain,
this should only be possible under extreme circumstances, such as major forks.
8ce3739edb test: verify wallet is still active post-migration failure (furszy)
771bc60f13 wallet: Use LegacyDataSPKM when loading (Ava Chow)
61d872f1b3 wallet: Move MigrateToDescriptor and DeleteRecords to LegacyDataSPKM (Ava Chow)
b231f4d556 wallet: Move LegacyScriptPubKeyMan::IsMine to LegacyDataSPKM (Ava Chow)
7461d0c006 wallet: Move LegacySPKM data storage and handling to LegacyDataSPKM (Ava Chow)
517e204bac Change MigrateLegacyToDescriptor to reopen wallet as BERKELEY_RO (Ava Chow)
Pull request description:
#26606 introduced `BerkeleyRODatabase` which is an independent parser for BDB files. This PR uses this in legacy wallet migration so that migration will continue to work once the legacy wallet and BDB are removed. `LegacyDataSPKM` is introduced to have the minimum data and functions necessary for a legacy wallet to be loaded for migration.
ACKs for top commit:
cbergqvist:
ACK 8ce3739edb
theStack:
Code-review ACK 8ce3739edb
furszy:
Code review ACK 8ce3739edb
Tree-SHA512: dccea12d6c597de15e3e42f97ab483cfd069e103611200279a177e021e8e9c4e74387c4f45d2e58b3a1e7e2bdb32a1d2d2060b1f8086c03eeaa0c68579d9d54e
Currently, the test is passing due to a mistake in the test inputs
selection process. We are selecting the parent transaction change
output as one of the inputs of the transaction to fund, which
helps to surpass the target amount when it shouldn't due to the
fee reduction.
The failure arises when the test behaves as intended by its coder;
that is, when it does not select the change output. In this case,
the pre-selected inputs aren't enough to cover the target amount.
Fix this by excluding the parent transaction's change output from
the inputs selection and including an extra input to cover the tx
fee.
8789dc8f31 doc: Add note to getblockfrompeer on missing undo data (Fabian Jahr)
4a1975008b rpc: Make pruneheight also reflect undo data presence (Fabian Jahr)
96b4facc91 refactor, blockstorage: Generalize GetFirstStoredBlock (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
The function `GetFirstStoredBlock()` helps us find the first block for which we have data. So far this function only looked for a block with `BLOCK_HAVE_DATA`. However, this doesn't mean that we also have the undo data of that block, and undo data might be required for what a user would like to do with those blocks. One example of how this might happen is if some blocks were fetched using the `getblockfrompeer` RPC. Blocks fetched from a peer will have data but no undo data.
The first commit here allows `GetFirstStoredBlock()` to check for undo data as well by passing a parameter. This alone is useful for #29553 and I would use it there.
In the second commit I am applying the undo check to the RPCs that report `pruneheight` to the user. I find this much more intuitive because I think the user expects to be able to do all operations on blocks up until the `pruneheight` but that is not the case if undo data is missing. I personally ran into this once before and now again when testing for assumeutxo when I had used `getblockfrompeer`. The following commit adds test coverage for this change of behavior.
The last commit adds a note in the docs of `getblockfrompeer` that undo data will not be available.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 8789dc8f31
furszy:
Code review ACK 8789dc8f31.
stickies-v:
ACK 8789dc8f31
Tree-SHA512: 90ae8bdd07a496ade579aa25240609c61c9ed173ad38d30533f6c631fe674e5a41727478ade69ca4b71a571ad94c9da4b33ebba6b5d8821109313c2de3bdfb3d
5b7f70ba26 test: loadtxoutset in divergent chain with less work (Alfonso Roman Zubeldia)
d35efe1efc p2p: Start downloading historical blocks from common ancestor (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a test to cover the scenario of loading an assumeutxo snapshot when the current chain tip is not an ancestor of the snapshot block but has less work.
During the review process, a bug was discovered where blocks between the last common ancestor and the background tip were not being requested if the background tip was not an ancestor of the snapshot block. mzumsande suggested a fix (65343ec49a6b73c4197dfc38e1c2f433b0a3838a) to start downloading historical blocks from the last common ancestor to address this issue. This fix has been incorporated into the PR with a slight modification.
Related to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28648
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
tACK 5b7f70ba26
achow101:
ACK 5b7f70ba26
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK 5b7f70ba26
Tree-SHA512: f8957349686a6a1292165ea9e0fd8c912d21466072632a10f8ef9d852a5f430bc6b2a531e6884a4dbf2e3adb28b3d512b25919e78f5804a67320ef54c3b1aaf6
d93b794709 tests: improve wallet multisig descriptor test and docs (Michael Dietz)
Pull request description:
It is best to store all key origin information
(master key fingerprint and all derivation steps)
in the multisig descriptor. Being explicit with
this information should be beneficial if this approach is used with other wallets/signers (whether hardware or software). There is no harm including all of this with xpubs (if anything it simplifies the test code) and makes this example/docs more complete and safer incase it is referenced by others.
ACKs for top commit:
S3RK:
Code Review ACK d93b794709
achow101:
ACK d93b794709
Tree-SHA512: 0e5c4d13f060489405e6cf50c8a09911f5a0cee71023649235afd80a5e3aae38d52c6e12ad4660205b9357b09f45596941391bdcf6fceccbe07c4e5a1592a482
c9dacd958d test: Check that non empty version packet is ignored and no disconnection happens (stratospher)
997cc00b95 test: Check that disconnection happens when AAD isn't filled (stratospher)
b5e6238fdb test: Check that disconnection happens when garbage sent/received are different (stratospher)
ad1482d5a2 test: Check that disconnection happens when wrong garbage terminator is sent (stratospher)
e351576862 test: Check that disconnection happens when >4095 garbage bytes is sent (stratospher)
e075fd131d test: Introduce test types and modify v2 handshake function accordingly (stratospher)
7d07daa623 log: Add V2 handshake timeout (stratospher)
d4a1da8543 test: Make global TRANSPORT_VERSION variable an instance variable (stratospher)
c642b08c4e test: Log when the garbage is actually sent to transport layer (stratospher)
86cca2cba2 test: Support disconnect waiting for add_p2p_connection (stratospher)
bf9669af9c test: Rename early key response test and move random_bitflip to util (stratospher)
Pull request description:
Add tests for the following v2 handshake scenarios:
1. Disconnection happens when > `MAX_GARBAGE_LEN` bytes garbage is sent
2. Disconnection happens when incorrect garbage terminator is sent
3. Disconnection happens when garbage bytes are tampered with
4. Disconnection happens when AAD of first encrypted packet after the garbage terminator is not filled
5. bitcoind ignores non-empty version packet and no disconnection happens
All these tests require a modified v2 P2P class (different from `EncryptedP2PState` used in `v2_p2p.py`) to implement our custom handshake behaviour based on different scenarios and have been kept in a single test file (`test/functional/p2p_v2_misbehaving.py`). Shifted the test in `test/functional/p2p_v2_earlykeyresponse.py` which is of the same pattern to this file too.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK c9dacd958d
mzumsande:
ACK c9dacd958d
theStack:
Code-review ACK c9dacd958d
Tree-SHA512: 90df81f0c7f4ecf0a47762d290a618ded92cde9f83d3ef3cc70e1b005ecb16125ec39a9d80ce95f99e695d29abd63443240cb5490aa57c5bc8fa2e52149a0672
de71d4dece fuzz: improve utxo_snapshot target (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
Add the possibility of giving more guidance to the creation of the metadata and/or coins, so that the fuzzer gets the chance
to reach more error conditions in ActivateSnapshot and sometimes successfully creates a valid snapshot.
This also changes the asserts for the success case that were outdated (after #29370) and only didn't result in a crash because the fuzzer wasn't able to reach this code before.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
re-ACK de71d4dece🎆
fjahr:
utACK de71d4dece
TheCharlatan:
ACK de71d4dece
Tree-SHA512: 346974d594164544d8cd3df7d8362c905fd93116215e9f5df308dfdac55bab04d727bfd7fd001cf11318682d11ee329b4b4a43308124c04d64b67840ab8a58a0
9e13ccc50e psbt: Check non witness utxo outpoint early (Ava Chow)
Pull request description:
A common issue that our fuzzers keep finding is that outpoints don't exist in the non witness utxos. Instead of trying to track this down and checking in various individual places, do the check early during deserialization. This also unifies the error message returned for this class of problems.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 9e13ccc50e
S3RK:
tACK 9e13ccc50e
dergoegge:
utACK 9e13ccc50e
Tree-SHA512: 81b8055b146c6358052226578ddfec0ae5bd877968c7f4f62dc3d6a684545ea568f37c7f1bd619918441af9e453ba8b26531a2280d218da37fa15480f1b45d0e
Add the possibility of giving more guidance to the creation of the
metadata and/or coins, so that the fuzzer gets the chance
to reach more error conditions in ActivateSnapshot and sometimes
successfully creates a valid snapshot.
This also changes the asserts for the success case that were outdated,
and only didn't result in a crash because the fuzzer wasn't able
to reach this code before.
This test checks that we can successfully process PSBTs and opt out of
finalization.
Previously trying to call `walletprocesspsbt` would attempt to
auto-finalize (as a convenience), and would not permit opt-out of
finalization, instead aborting via `CHECK_NONFATAL`.
2342b46c45 test: Add coverage for getchaintxstats in assumeutxo context (Fabian Jahr)
faf2a6750b rpc: Reorder getchaintxstats output (MarcoFalke)
fa2dada0c9 rpc: Avoid getchaintxstats invalid results (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The `getchaintxstats` RPC reply during AU background download may return non-zero, but invalid, values for `window_tx_count` and `txrate`.
For example, `txcount` may be zero for a to-be-downloaded block, but may be non-zero for an ancestor block which is already downloaded. Thus, the values returned may be negative (and cause intermediate integer sanitizer violations).
Also, `txcount` may be accurate for the snapshot base block, or a descendant of it. However it may be zero for an ancestor block that still needs to be downloaded. Thus, the values returned may be positive, but wrong.
Fix all issues by skipping the returned value if either `txcount` is unset (equal to zero).
Also, skip `txcount` in the returned value, if it is unset (equal to zero).
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29328
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
re-ACK 2342b46c45
achow101:
ACK 2342b46c45
mzumsande:
ACK 2342b46c45
Tree-SHA512: 931cecc40ee5dc0f96be728db7eb297155f8343076cd29c8b8c050c99fd1d568b80f54c9459a34ca7a9489c2474c729796d00eeb1934d6a9f7b4d6a53e3ec430
926b8e39dc [doc] add release note for TRUC (glozow)
19a9b90617 use version=3 instead of v3 in debug strings (glozow)
881fac8e60 scripted-diff: change names from V3 to TRUC (glozow)
a573dd2617 [doc] replace mentions of v3 with TRUC (glozow)
089b5757df rename mempool_accept_v3.py to mempool_truc.py (glozow)
f543852a89 rename policy/v3_policy.* to policy/truc_policy.* (glozow)
Pull request description:
Adds a release note for TRUC policy which will be live in v28.0.
For clarity, replaces mentions of "v3" with "TRUC" in most places. Suggested in
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29496#discussion_r1629749583
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29496#discussion_r1624500904
I changed error strings from "v3-violation" to "TRUC-violation" but left v3 in the debug strings because I think it might be clearer for somebody who is debugging. Similarly, I left some variables unchanged because I think they're more descriptive this way, e.g. `tx_v3_from_v2_and_v3`. I'm happy to debate places that should or shouldn't be documented differently in this PR, whatever is clearest to everyone.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
reACK 926b8e39dc
achow101:
ACK 926b8e39dc
ismaelsadeeq:
Code review ACK 926b8e39dc
Tree-SHA512: 16c88add0a29dc6d1236c4d45f34a17b850f6727b231953cbd52eb9f7268d1d802563eadfc8b7928c94ed3d7a615275dd103e57e81439ebf3ba2b12efa1e42af
2f9bde69f4 test: Remove unnecessary restart in assumeutxo test (Fabian Jahr)
19ce3d407e assumeutxo: Check snapshot base block is not marked invalid (Fabian Jahr)
80315c0118 refactor: Move early loadtxoutset checks into ActiveSnapshot (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
This was discovered in a discussion in #29996
If the base block of the snapshot is marked invalid or part of an invalid chain, we currently still load the snapshot and get stuck in a weird state where we have the snapshot chainstate but it will never connect to our valid chain.
While this scenario is highly unlikely to occur on mainnet, it still seems good to prevent this inconsistent state.
The behavior change described above is in the second commit.
The first commit refactors the early checks in the `loadtxoutset` RPC by moving them into `ActivateSnapshot()` in order to have the chance to cover them by unit tests in the future and have a more consistent interface. Previously checks were spread out between `rpc/blockchain.cpp` and `validation.cpp`. In order to be able to return the error message to users of the RPC, the return type of `ActivateSnapshot()` is changed from `bool` to `util::Result`.
The third commit removes an unnecessary restart introduced in #29428.
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
re-ACK 2f9bde6
alfonsoromanz:
Re-ACK 2f9bde69f4. The RPC code looks much cleaner after the refactor. Also, it seems very useful to get the error message in the RPC response rather than having to rely on the logs in some scenarios if you are an RPC user.
achow101:
ACK 2f9bde69f4
Tree-SHA512: 5328dd88c3c7be3f1be97c9eef52ac3666c27188c30a798b3e949f3ffcb83be075127c107e4046f7f39f961a79911ea3d61b61f3c11e451b3e4c541c264eeed4
8ec24bdad8 test: Added coverage to Block not found error using gettxoutsetinfo (kevkevinpal)
Pull request description:
#### Description
There were no tests that checked for the `Block not found` error called in `ParseHashOrHeight` when using `gettxoutsetinfo`, this change adds coverage to it.
You can see there are no tests that do the following by doing the below
`grep -nri "Block not found.*gettxoutsetinfo" ./test/functional/`
which leads to no results
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 8ec24bdad8
tdb3:
ACK 8ec24bdad8
kristapsk:
ACK 8ec24bdad8
brunoerg:
crACK 8ec24bdad8
alfonsoromanz:
Re ACK 8ec24bdad8
Tree-SHA512: 2c61c681e7304c679cc3d7dd13af1b795780e85716c25c7423d68104e253d01271e048e21bc21be35dbc7ec1a4fde94e439542f3cfd669fe5a16478c5fa982ab
e38eadb2c2 test: change comments to `self.log.info` for `test_addnode_getaddednodeinfo` (brunoerg)
c838e3b610 test: add coverage for `node` field of `getaddednodeinfo` RPC (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
We currently do not test a successful call to `getaddednodeinfo` filtering by `node`, we only test it with an unknown address and checks whether it fails. This PR adds coverage to it.
ACKs for top commit:
kevkevinpal:
ACK [e38eadb](e38eadb2c2)
achow101:
ACK e38eadb2c2
tdb3:
re ACK e38eadb2c2
BrandonOdiwuor:
Code Review ACK e38eadb2c2
rkrux:
tACK [e38eadb](e38eadb2c2)
Tree-SHA512: e9f768b7aa86e58b0b0ced089ead57040ff9a5204493da1ab99c8bc897b6dcdce7c856855f74c52010fceef19af1e12a39eee9f8f2e7294b42476b6f980fe754
In the Tor case, this prevents us from telling the Tor daemon to send
our incoming connections from the Tor network to an address where we
do not listen (we tried to listen but failed probably because another
application is already listening).
In the other cases (IPv4/IPv6 binds) this also prevents unpleasant
surprises caused by continuing operations even on bind failure. For
example, another application may be listening on portX, bitcoind tries
to bind on portX and portY, only succeeds with portY and continues
operation leaving the user thinking that his bitcoind is listening on
portX whereas another application is listening (the error message in
the log could easily be missed).
Avoid having the functional testing framework start multiple `bitcoind`s
that try to listen on the same `127.0.0.1:18445` (Tor listen for
regtest) if `bind_to_localhost_only` is set to `False`.
Also fix a typo in `test-shell.md` related to `bind_to_localhost_only`.
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22727
If only `-bind=addr:port` is given (without `-bind=...=onion`) then we
would bind to `addr:port` _and_ to `127.0.0.1:8334` in addition which
may be unexpected, assuming the semantic of `-bind=addr:port` is
"bind _only_ to `addr:port`".
Change the above to not do the additional bind: if only
`-bind=addr:port` is given (without `-bind=...=onion`) then bind to
`addr:port` (only). If we are creating a Tor hidden service then use
`addr:port` as target (same behavior as before
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19991).
This allows disabling binding on the onion port.
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22726
Keep mentions of v3 in debug strings to help people who might not know
that TRUC is applied when version=3.
Also keep variable names in tests, as it is less verbose to keep v3 and v2.
The migration process reloads the wallet after all failures.
This commit tests the behavior by trying to obtain a new address
after a decryption failure during migration.
The "connect to ourself" detection logic has been first introduced
by Satoshi in October 2009, together with a couple of other changes
and a version bump to "v0.1.6 BETA" (see commit
cc0b4c3b62).
73f0a6cbd0 doc: detail -rpccookieperms option (willcl-ark)
d2afa2690c test: add rpccookieperms test (willcl-ark)
f467aede78 init: add option for rpccookie permissions (willcl-ark)
7df03f1a92 util: add perm string helper functions (willcl-ark)
Pull request description:
This PR picks up #26088 by aureleoules which adds a bitcoind launch option `-rpccookieperms` to set the file permissions of the cookie generated by bitcoin core.
Example usage to make the generated cookie group-readable: `./src/bitcoind -rpccookieperms=group`.
Accepted values for `-rpccookieperms` are `[owner|group|all]`. We let `fs::perms` handle platform-specific permissions changes.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 73f0a6cbd0
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 73f0a6cbd0. Main change since last review is no longer throwing a skip exception in the rpc test on windows, so other checks can run after it, and overall test result is passing, not skipped. Also were clarifying renames and documentation improvements.
tdb3:
cr ACK 73f0a6cbd0
Tree-SHA512: e800d59a44aca10e1c58ca69bf3fdde9f6ccf5eab4b7b962645af6d6bc0cfa3a357701e409c8c60d8d7744fcd33a91e77ada11790aa88cd7811ef60fab86ab11
This allows a transaction's weight to be bound under a certain
weight if possible and desired. This can be beneficial for future
RBF attempts, or whenever a more restricted spend topology is
desired.
Co-authored-by: Greg Sanders <gsanders87@gmail.com>
