mirror of
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git
synced 2025-01-25 02:33:24 -03:00
validation: Don't load a snapshot if it's not in the best header chain.
If the snapshot is not an ancestor of the most-work header (m_best_header), syncing from that alternative chain should be prioritised. Therefore don't accept loading a snapshot in this situation. If that other chain turns out to be invalid, m_best_header would be reset and loading the snapshot should be possible again. Because of the work required to generate a conflicting headers chain, this should only be possible under extreme circumstances, such as major forks.
This commit is contained in:
parent
e5a5497d98
commit
55b6d7be68
2 changed files with 33 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -5683,6 +5683,10 @@ util::Result<void> ChainstateManager::ActivateSnapshot(
|
|||
return util::Error{strprintf(Untranslated("The base block header (%s) is part of an invalid chain"), base_blockhash.ToString())};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!m_best_header || m_best_header->GetAncestor(base_blockheight) != snapshot_start_block) {
|
||||
return util::Error{_("A forked headers-chain with more work than the chain with the snapshot base block header exists. Please proceed to sync without AssumeUtxo.")};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
auto mempool{m_active_chainstate->GetMempool()};
|
||||
if (mempool && mempool->size() > 0) {
|
||||
return util::Error{Untranslated("Can't activate a snapshot when mempool not empty")};
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -15,20 +15,21 @@ Interesting test cases could be loading an assumeutxo snapshot file with:
|
|||
|
||||
- TODO: Valid snapshot file, but referencing a snapshot block that turns out to be
|
||||
invalid, or has an invalid parent
|
||||
- TODO: Valid snapshot file and snapshot block, but the block is not on the
|
||||
most-work chain
|
||||
|
||||
Interesting starting states could be loading a snapshot when the current chain tip is:
|
||||
|
||||
- TODO: An ancestor of snapshot block
|
||||
- TODO: The snapshot block
|
||||
- TODO: A descendant of the snapshot block
|
||||
- TODO: Not an ancestor or a descendant of the snapshot block and has more work
|
||||
|
||||
"""
|
||||
from shutil import rmtree
|
||||
|
||||
from dataclasses import dataclass
|
||||
from test_framework.blocktools import (
|
||||
create_block,
|
||||
create_coinbase
|
||||
)
|
||||
from test_framework.messages import tx_from_hex
|
||||
from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
|
||||
from test_framework.util import (
|
||||
|
@ -241,6 +242,30 @@ class AssumeutxoTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
|
|||
self.sync_blocks(nodes=(n0, n3))
|
||||
self.wait_until(lambda: len(n3.getchainstates()['chainstates']) == 1)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_snapshot_not_on_most_work_chain(self, dump_output_path):
|
||||
self.log.info("Test snapshot is not loaded when the node knows the headers of another chain with more work.")
|
||||
node0 = self.nodes[0]
|
||||
node1 = self.nodes[1]
|
||||
# Create an alternative chain of 2 new blocks, forking off the main chain at the block before the snapshot block.
|
||||
# This simulates a longer chain than the main chain when submitting these two block headers to node 1 because it is only aware of
|
||||
# the main chain headers up to the snapshot height.
|
||||
parent_block_hash = node0.getblockhash(SNAPSHOT_BASE_HEIGHT - 1)
|
||||
block_time = node0.getblock(node0.getbestblockhash())['time'] + 1
|
||||
fork_block1 = create_block(int(parent_block_hash, 16), create_coinbase(SNAPSHOT_BASE_HEIGHT), block_time)
|
||||
fork_block1.solve()
|
||||
fork_block2 = create_block(fork_block1.sha256, create_coinbase(SNAPSHOT_BASE_HEIGHT + 1), block_time + 1)
|
||||
fork_block2.solve()
|
||||
node1.submitheader(fork_block1.serialize().hex())
|
||||
node1.submitheader(fork_block2.serialize().hex())
|
||||
msg = "A forked headers-chain with more work than the chain with the snapshot base block header exists. Please proceed to sync without AssumeUtxo."
|
||||
assert_raises_rpc_error(-32603, msg, node1.loadtxoutset, dump_output_path)
|
||||
# Cleanup: submit two more headers of the snapshot chain to node 1, so that it is the most-work chain again and loading
|
||||
# the snapshot in future subtests succeeds
|
||||
main_block1 = node0.getblock(node0.getblockhash(SNAPSHOT_BASE_HEIGHT + 1), 0)
|
||||
main_block2 = node0.getblock(node0.getblockhash(SNAPSHOT_BASE_HEIGHT + 2), 0)
|
||||
node1.submitheader(main_block1)
|
||||
node1.submitheader(main_block2)
|
||||
|
||||
def run_test(self):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Bring up two (disconnected) nodes, mine some new blocks on the first,
|
||||
|
@ -330,6 +355,7 @@ class AssumeutxoTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
|
|||
self.test_invalid_chainstate_scenarios()
|
||||
self.test_invalid_file_path()
|
||||
self.test_snapshot_block_invalidated(dump_output['path'])
|
||||
self.test_snapshot_not_on_most_work_chain(dump_output['path'])
|
||||
|
||||
self.log.info(f"Loading snapshot into second node from {dump_output['path']}")
|
||||
loaded = n1.loadtxoutset(dump_output['path'])
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue