a67983cd6d net_processing: Add review-only assertion to PeerManager (Carl Dong)
272d993e75 scripted-diff: net_processing: Use existing chainman (Carl Dong)
021a04a469 net_processing: Move some static functions to PeerManager (Carl Dong)
91c5b68acd node/ifaces: ChainImpl: Use existing NodeContext member (Carl Dong)
8a1d580b21 node/ifaces: NodeImpl: Use existing NodeContext member (Carl Dong)
4cde4a701b node: Use existing NodeContext (Carl Dong)
106bcd4f39 node/coinstats: Pass in BlockManager to GetUTXOStats (Carl Dong)
2c3ba00693 miner: Pass in blockman to ::RegenerateCommitments (Carl Dong)
2afcf24408 miner: Remove old CreateNewBlock w/o chainstate param (Carl Dong)
46b7f29340 scripted-diff: Invoke CreateNewBlock with chainstate (Carl Dong)
d0de61b764 miner: Pass in chainstate to BlockAssembler::CreateNewBlock (Carl Dong)
a04aac493f validation: Remove extraneous LoadGenesisBlock function prototype (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
Overall PR: #20158 (tree-wide: De-globalize ChainstateManager)
Based on:
- [x] #21055 | [Bundle 3/n] Prune g_chainman usage in mempool-related validation functions
Note to reviewers:
1. This bundle may _apparently_ introduce usage of `g_chainman` or `::Chain(state|)Active()` globals, but these are resolved later on in the overall PR. [Commits of overall PR](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20158/commits)
2. There may be seemingly obvious local references to `ChainstateManager` or other validation objects which are not being used in callers of the current function in question, this is done intentionally to **_keep each commit centered around one function/method_** to ease review and to make the overall change systematic. We don't assume anything about our callers. Rest assured that once we are considering that particular caller in later commits, we will use the obvious local references. [Commits of overall PR](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20158/commits)
3. When changing a function/method that has many callers (e.g. `LookupBlockIndex` with 55 callers), it is sometimes easier (and less error-prone) to use a scripted-diff. When doing so, there will be 3 commits in sequence so that every commit compiles like so:
1. Add `new_function`, make `old_function` a wrapper of `new_function`, divert all calls to `old_function` to `new_function` **in the local module only**
2. Scripted-diff to divert all calls to `old_function` to `new_function` **in the rest of the codebase**
3. Remove `old_function`
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK a67983cd6d
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK a67983cd6d. Only change since last review new first commit fixing header declaration, and rebase
glozow:
code review ACK a67983cd6d
Tree-SHA512: dce182a18b88be80cbf50978d4ba8fa6ab0f01e861d09bae0ae9364051bb78f9334859d164b185b07f1d70a583e739557fab6d820cac8c37b3855b85c2a6771b
c524dc54bb qt: Fix regression with initial sorting after pr205 (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Unfortunately, #205 introduced a regression. After opening the "Receive" or "Transaction" tab at first time despite of the "Date" header is marked as sorted, table rows are not sorted actually:
It appears that sorting the table must be triggered _after_ the `QTableView::setModel` call.
With this PR (and pre-#205):
ACKs for top commit:
Talkless:
tACK c524dc54bb, tested on Debian Sid with Qt 5.15.2. I can confirm @leonardojobim observations.
leonardojobim:
Tested ACK c524dc54bb on Ubuntu 20.04.2 Qt 5.12.8
jonatack:
ACK c524dc54bb
jarolrod:
ACK c524dc54bb, tested on macOS 11.1 Qt 5.15.2
Tree-SHA512: e370229979a70d63a0b64dbc11c4eca338695a070881d4d8f015644617f180e6accc24d6bdf98a75e7c9ba9be2a0ace9a2b7eb9c783ebb2992c3b2c3b3deb408
7c90c67b7e rpc: refactor rpc wallet functions to take references instead of pointers (fanquake)
4866934008 rpc: remove calls to CWallet.get() (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This is a rebased #18592.
> This PR replaces raw pointers in `rpcwallet.cpp` and `rpcdump.cpp` with **shared_ptr**. The motivation for this PR is described here https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18590
> It seems that this PR is indirectly related to this issue: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13063#discussion_r186740049
> Notice: I have deliberately **not** changed the class `WalletRescanReserver ` whose constructor expects a raw pointer, because it's external and affects other areas, which I didn't touch to avoid making this PR "viral".
> Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18590
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 7c90c67b7e🐧
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 7c90c67b7e. Changes easy to review with `--word-diff-regex=. -U0`
Tree-SHA512: 32d69c813026b02260e8a89de9d6a5ab9e87826ba230687246583ac7a80c8c3fd00318da4658f1450e04c23d2c77ae765862de0d2a110b1312b3b69a1161e7ba
fad0ae6bb8 doc: Rename fuzz seed_dir to corpus_dir (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The fuzz corpus directory might contain hand-crafted seeds, but generally it is a set of test inputs. See also https://github.com/google/fuzzing/blob/master/docs/glossary.md#corpus
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK fad0ae6bb8: patch looks correct and "why not?" :)
fanquake:
ACK fad0ae6bb8 - did not test
Tree-SHA512: 38c952feb07aeeeb038b3261a12c824fab9ce5153d75f0ecf6d3f43db4f50998eeb2b14b11b7155f529189c93783fa2c11c81059021a04398c43f3505b31a2d4
ffdd7de690 build, qt: Fix regression introduced in #21363 (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
After #21363 the `_BITCOIN_QT_CHECK_STATIC_PLUGIN` never fails due to the ill-formed code.
Sorry for breaking it.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK ffdd7de690
Tree-SHA512: 0af3334af5332f3b349dba219565ee336090541c2c4fae53d7dc4dd2aa05291b3c7c13bfc506219f642fb854f3c887f0f9621b42d0df68d5d794e0563b2cf5d4
fa476f188e Use C++11 member initializer in CNodeState (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This removes a bunch of boilerplate, makes the code easier to read. Also, C++11 member initialization avoids accidental uninitialized members.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK fa476f188e
hebasto:
cr ACK fa476f188e
jnewbery:
utACK fa476f188e
Tree-SHA512: 5c876717d30ded975e29bfbc77804012179588a13f950f0b2ec93fa9dbd5cf6b52fe86414fd5d1cce021db2ec77e271d533b0f7a8d6eeaac0feb9e6dbaec9ff2
fa4e088cba wallet: Mark replaced tx to not be in the mempool anymore (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The wallet does not mark the replaced tx as out-of-mempool. This causes failures in user scripts, because later RPCs may depend on this state change from `bumpfee`.
For example, the following might fail on current master:
```
txid = sendtoaddress(...)
bumpfee(txid)
abandontransaction(txid) # fails because txid is still marked as "in mempool"
```
Fixes#18831
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
utACK fa4e088cba
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa4e088cba, and previous ACK faeedff5c87091fd83d2fb2b29eb49c948363f29 is also still valid in case there's a preference for the original fix
Tree-SHA512: 9858f40f5fb5a43a7b584b5c4268b6befa82e6a84583be5206fe721bcb6c255e8d35479d347d0b9aed72703df49887c02b14ab680e8efdd28b90dd6b93d9439a
48a0319bab Add a test that selects too large if BnB is used (Andrew Chow)
3e69939b78 Fail if maximum weight is too large (Andrew Chow)
51e2cd322c Have CalculateMaximumSignedTxSize also compute tx weight (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Currently the `Transaction too large` is calculated on the transaction that is returned from `CreateTransaction`. This does not make sense for when `CreateTransaction` is being used for `fundrawtransaction` as no signing occurs so the final returned transaction is missing signatures. Thus users may successfully fund a transaction but fail to broadcast it after it has been fully signed.
So instead we should figure out whether the transaction we are funding will be too large after it is signed. We can do this by having `CalculateMaximumSignedTxSize` also return the transaction weight and then comparing that weight against the maximum weight.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK 48a0319bab
meshcollider:
utACK 48a0319bab
Xekyo:
utACK with nits 48a0319bab
Tree-SHA512: 1700c60b07f67e2d5c591c5ccd131ac9f1861fab3def961c3c9c4b3281ec1063fe8e4f0f7f1038cac72692340856406bcee8fb45c8104d2ad34357a0ec878ac7
e21276a82a qt test: Don't bind to regtest port (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
The qt tests don't need to bind to the regtest port. By not binding, it will no longer conflict with existing regtest instances and the tests will run as normal.
Fixes#10
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK e21276a82a
jarolrod:
re-ACK e21276a82a, tested on macOS 11.2
Tree-SHA512: 5a269ee043f9aff7900e092c166de71912a2bf86ebe2982b3fb0e26bdebfb91869ee5d0f62082fd608c1288bfb7981f6c8647e504b11176711d7fec993a09164
A fix for QTBUG-34748 was introduced in #5915 (v0.11.0, Qt 5.2.1).
QTBUG-34748 was fixed in version 5.3.0.
The separated patch file, provided by #5915, was dropped in #12971 while
bumping Qt to 5.9.4 (5.9.6). But libxcb.mk remained unchanged.
This change reverts #5915 for libxcb.mk.
6242beeb06 Hoist repeated translated strings to RPCConsole struct members (Jon Atack)
0f035c12fb RPCConsole::updateDetailWidget: convert strings to translated strings (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
- fixups from #206 review feedback (thanks!), see commit message for details
- hoists repeatedly used translatable strings to the `RPCConsole` class for reuse
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK 6242beeb06
Talkless:
tACK 6242beeb06, tested on Debian Sid with Qt 5.15.2. I see "Ban for.." translated to my native language as before, "To/From/Yes/No" are not but that's expected, as `.ts` files are not updated.
jarolrod:
ACK 6242beeb06
Tree-SHA512: 20a296511c5ac03a816766237fa2731b0360dedebf1bea02711eb21d7e4eae2a63a051fe48f4726052edc3e6318952f01fef920cd4b22a8196c39c23d8e5cc3a
1d5d832d5c qt, refactor: Use enum type as switch argument in TransactionTableModel (Hennadii Stepanov)
52f122c11f qt, refactor: Use enum type as switch argument in PeerTableModel (Hennadii Stepanov)
a35223f1cd qt, refactor: Use enum type as switch argument in BanTableModel (Hennadii Stepanov)
ab8a747d1c qt, refactor: Use enum type as switch argument in AddressTableModel (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR makes code more maintainable by leveraging `-Wswitch` compiler warnings.
Only the `RecentRequestsTableModel` is not refactored, because its `enum ColumnIndex` contains additional `NUMBER_OF_COLUMNS` value.
No behavior change.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
Do you mind mentioning the _top_ pr commit with your ACK, i.e., 1d5d832d5c, not ab8a747d1ced9f20ca32f9898418be70670da71a?
jarolrod:
ACK 1d5d832d5c, tested on macOS 11.1 Qt 5.15.2
leonardojobim:
ACK 1d5d832d5c, tested on Ubuntu 20.04 Qt 5.12.8
promag:
Code review ACK 1d5d832d5c.
Tree-SHA512: 0d474d226a2fa0069495d1aa5ec13b2470708ec7b8a6ab35402236c7bf57cb9939577677a30dfa54f5e3bc0477c6cfffd20ed6f19e4eb394a938569cc9347851
0c471a5f30 tests: check never active versionbits (Anthony Towns)
3ba9283a47 tests: more helpful errors for failing versionbits tests (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
Extracted from #19573 to make review easier. I also reviewed it myself.
I added some comments to the test: bae9a45219 (r585486781)
I also moved some `TestState` changes from the second to the first commit, to reduce the latter diff.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK 0c471a5f30
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 0c471a5f30🔓
Tree-SHA512: 61f8d1ecaf38a6cd13db1cf71c89b8c4d2f5852ef77c5e7ecb9bd78eb216545037411641bb101cf0740c5c47845ac327954ee25b676d63779c5f148719ac5caf
The qt tests don't need to bind to the regtest port. By not binding, it
will no longer conflict with existing regtest instances and the tests
will run as normal.
7af25024e9 build: compile libnatpmp with -DNATPMP_STATICLIB on Windows (fanquake)
ee35745754 build: use newer source for libnatpmp (fanquake)
Pull request description:
The source we are currently using is from 2015. The upstream repo has
received a small number of bug fixes and improvements since then.
Including one that fixes an issue for Windows users: https://github.com/miniupnp/libnatpmp/pull/13.
The source we are currently using is the most recent "official" release,
however I don't think it's worth waiting for a new one. The maintainer
was prompted to do so in Oct 2020, then again in Jan of this year, and
no release has eventuated. Given libnatpmp is a new inclusion into our
repository, I think we should be using this newer source.
This also cleans up a few warnings we currently see in Windows depends builds:
```bash
Extracting libnatpmp...
/home/ubuntu/bitcoin/depends/sources/libnatpmp-20150609.tar.gz: OK
Preprocessing libnatpmp...
Configuring libnatpmp...
Building libnatpmp...
make[1]: Entering directory '/home/ubuntu/bitcoin/depends/work/build/x86_64-w64-mingw32/libnatpmp/20150609-13efa1beb87'
x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -Os -fPIC -Wall -DENABLE_STRNATPMPERR -c -o natpmp.o natpmp.c
x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -Os -fPIC -Wall -DENABLE_STRNATPMPERR -c -o getgateway.o getgateway.c
natpmp.c:42: warning: "EWOULDBLOCK" redefined
42 | #define EWOULDBLOCK WSAEWOULDBLOCK
|
In file included from natpmp.c:38:
/usr/share/mingw-w64/include/errno.h:166: note: this is the location of the previous definition
166 | #define EWOULDBLOCK 140
|
natpmp.c:43: warning: "ECONNREFUSED" redefined
43 | #define ECONNREFUSED WSAECONNREFUSED
|
In file included from natpmp.c:38:
/usr/share/mingw-w64/include/errno.h:110: note: this is the location of the previous definition
110 | #define ECONNREFUSED 107
|
natpmp.c:271:5: warning: ‘readnatpmpresponseorretry’ redeclared without dllimport attribute: previous dllimport ignored [-Wattributes]
271 | int readnatpmpresponseorretry(natpmp_t * p, natpmpresp_t * response)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ar crs libnatpmp.a natpmp.o getgateway.o
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/ubuntu/bitcoin/depends/work/build/x86_64-w64-mingw32/libnatpmp/20150609-13efa1beb87'
Staging libnatpmp...
Postprocessing libnatpmp...
Caching libnatpmp...
```
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 7af25024e9
Tree-SHA512: 6939014ea986149a5bfdd42b516d563a65ae643516e234579d3f28e7c2f877b0270cc4305ae7c7cb131d6d946a6e0aedc84b4cc880a412612a878a333398b9d7
67c59ae479 qt: Make warning label look clickable (Jarol Rodriguez)
Pull request description:
The warning icon on the overview page indicates that there is something important the user should know about, but a user may not be aware that they can click it because, on `master`, the warning label does not look clickable. As detailed in issue #23, the reason to make it look clickable is that it if they "had a more clickable-appearance (borders or beveled button edges) it could help users more quickly understand what they are being alerted to."
This PR removes the `flat` property from both `QPushButton`'s to make them look like a button, and therefore clickable. Furthermore, it updates the `Maximum Width` to `45` to fix the small hit-box issue outlined in issue #215.
Below are screenshots showing how the warning icon looks under `master` and this `PR`:
**macOS 11.1: Qt 5.15**
| Master | PR |
| ----------- | ----------- |
| <img width="754" alt="Screen Shot 2021-02-22 at 5 00 40 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23396902/108776135-f6d50380-752f-11eb-9f96-25163c6a2a02.png"> | <img width="754" alt="Screen Shot 2021-02-22 at 3 08 40 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23396902/108776068-e0c74300-752f-11eb-9545-3580e2b8f187.png"> |
**Ubuntu 20.04: Qt 5.12**
| Master | PR |
| ----------- | ----------- |
| <img width="783" alt="Screen Shot 2021-02-22 at 4 57 32 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23396902/108776249-284dcf00-7530-11eb-8325-7fe13a9243a7.png"> |  |
Closes#23Closes#215
ACKs for top commit:
Talkless:
tACK 67c59ae479, tested on Debian Sid. Does look as expected.
Tree-SHA512: 2b7302fb990ea49e2f01df6f4a23e2bc3de0797da89deaeb299742e6b285a0c21ea80d8259dc0222640cccc2bccc4ea09df443b9a11bf8b88a828e5fb2aec12c
a061a29970 test: bring p2p_leak.py up to date. (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
After the introduction of wtxidrelay and sendaddrv2 messages during version handshake, extend p2p_leak.py test to reflect this.
Also, some minor fixes and doc improvements.
I also added a test that peers not completing the version handshake will be disconnected for timeout, as suggested by MarcoFalke in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19723#issuecomment-699540294.
ACKs for top commit:
brunoerg:
Tested ACK a061a29970
theStack:
Tested ACK a061a29970
Tree-SHA512: 26c601491fa8710fc972d1b8f15da6b387a95b42bbfb629ec4c668769ad3824b6dd6a33d97363bca2171e403d8d1ce08abf3e5c9cab34f98d53e0109b1c7a0e5
