c9dacd958d test: Check that non empty version packet is ignored and no disconnection happens (stratospher)
997cc00b95 test: Check that disconnection happens when AAD isn't filled (stratospher)
b5e6238fdb test: Check that disconnection happens when garbage sent/received are different (stratospher)
ad1482d5a2 test: Check that disconnection happens when wrong garbage terminator is sent (stratospher)
e351576862 test: Check that disconnection happens when >4095 garbage bytes is sent (stratospher)
e075fd131d test: Introduce test types and modify v2 handshake function accordingly (stratospher)
7d07daa623 log: Add V2 handshake timeout (stratospher)
d4a1da8543 test: Make global TRANSPORT_VERSION variable an instance variable (stratospher)
c642b08c4e test: Log when the garbage is actually sent to transport layer (stratospher)
86cca2cba2 test: Support disconnect waiting for add_p2p_connection (stratospher)
bf9669af9c test: Rename early key response test and move random_bitflip to util (stratospher)
Pull request description:
Add tests for the following v2 handshake scenarios:
1. Disconnection happens when > `MAX_GARBAGE_LEN` bytes garbage is sent
2. Disconnection happens when incorrect garbage terminator is sent
3. Disconnection happens when garbage bytes are tampered with
4. Disconnection happens when AAD of first encrypted packet after the garbage terminator is not filled
5. bitcoind ignores non-empty version packet and no disconnection happens
All these tests require a modified v2 P2P class (different from `EncryptedP2PState` used in `v2_p2p.py`) to implement our custom handshake behaviour based on different scenarios and have been kept in a single test file (`test/functional/p2p_v2_misbehaving.py`). Shifted the test in `test/functional/p2p_v2_earlykeyresponse.py` which is of the same pattern to this file too.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK c9dacd958d
mzumsande:
ACK c9dacd958d
theStack:
Code-review ACK c9dacd958d
Tree-SHA512: 90df81f0c7f4ecf0a47762d290a618ded92cde9f83d3ef3cc70e1b005ecb16125ec39a9d80ce95f99e695d29abd63443240cb5490aa57c5bc8fa2e52149a0672
94ed4fbf8e Add release note for size 2 package rbf (Greg Sanders)
afd52d8e63 doc: update package RBF comment (Greg Sanders)
6e3c4394cf mempool: Improve logging of replaced transactions (Greg Sanders)
d3466e4cc5 CheckPackageMempoolAcceptResult: Check package rbf invariants (Greg Sanders)
316d7b63c9 Fuzz: pass mempool to CheckPackageMempoolAcceptResult (Greg Sanders)
4d15bcf448 [test] package rbf (glozow)
dc21f61c72 [policy] package rbf (Suhas Daftuar)
5da3967815 PackageV3Checks: Relax assumptions (Greg Sanders)
Pull request description:
Allows any 2 transaction package with no in-mempool ancestors to do package RBF when directly conflicting with other mempool clusters of size two or less.
Proposed validation steps:
1) If the transaction package is of size 1, legacy rbf rules apply.
2) Otherwise the transaction package consists of a (parent, child) pair with no other in-mempool ancestors (or descendants, obviously), so it is also going to create a cluster of size 2. If larger, fail.
3) The package rbf may not evict more than 100 transactions from the mempool(bip125 rule 5)
4) The package is a single chunk
5) Every directly conflicted mempool transaction is connected to at most 1 other in-mempool transaction (ie the cluster size of the conflict is at most 2).
6) Diagram check: We ensure that the replacement is strictly superior, improving the mempool
7) The total fee of the package, minus the total fee of what is being evicted, is at least the minrelayfee * size of the package (equivalent to bip125 rule 3 and 4)
Post-cluster mempool this will likely be expanded to general package rbf, but this is what we can safely support today.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 94ed4fbf8e
glozow:
reACK 94ed4fbf8e via range-diff
ismaelsadeeq:
re-ACK 94ed4fbf8e
theStack:
Code-review ACK 94ed4fbf8e
murchandamus:
utACK 94ed4fbf8e
Tree-SHA512: 9bd383e695964f362f147482bbf73b1e77c4d792bda2e91d7f30d74b3540a09146a5528baf86854a113005581e8c75f04737302517b7d5124296bd7a151e3992
Adds argument --resultsfile to test_runner.py.
Writes comma-separated functional test name, status,
and duration to the file provided with the argument.
Also fixes minor typo in test_runner.py
d51fbab4b3 wallet, test: Be able to always swap BDB endianness (Ava Chow)
0b753156ce test: Test bdb_ro dump of wallet without reset LSNs (Ava Chow)
c1984f1282 test: Test dumping dbs with overflow pages (Ava Chow)
fd7b16e391 test: Test dumps of other endian BDB files (Ava Chow)
6ace3e953f bdb: Be able to make byteswapped databases (Ava Chow)
d9878903fb Error if LSNs are not reset (Ava Chow)
4d7a3ae78e Berkeley RO Database fuzz test (TheCharlatan)
3568dce9e9 tests: Add BerkeleyRO to db prefix tests (Ava Chow)
70cfbfdadf wallettool: Optionally use BERKELEY_RO as format when dumping BDB wallets (Ava Chow)
dd57713f6e Add MakeBerkeleyRODatabase (Ava Chow)
6e50bee67d Implement handling of other endianness in BerkeleyRODatabase (Ava Chow)
cdd61c9cc1 wallet: implement independent BDB deserializer in BerkeleyRODatabase (Ava Chow)
ecba230979 wallet: implement BerkeleyRODatabase::Backup (Ava Chow)
0c8e728476 wallet: implement BerkeleyROBatch (Ava Chow)
756ff9b478 wallet: add dummy BerkeleyRODatabase and BerkeleyROBatch classes (Ava Chow)
ca18aea5c4 Add AutoFile::seek and tell (Ava Chow)
Pull request description:
Split from #26596
This PR adds `BerkeleyRODatabase` which is an independent implementation of a BDB file parser. It provides read only access to a BDB file, and can therefore be used as a read only database backend for wallets. This will be used for dumping legacy wallet records and migrating legacy wallets without the need for BDB itself.
Wallettool's `dump` command is changed to use `BerkeleyRODatabase` instead of `BerkeleyDatabase` (and `CWallet` itself) to demonstrate that this parser works and to test it against the existing wallettool functional tests.
ACKs for top commit:
josibake:
reACK d51fbab4b3
TheCharlatan:
Re-ACK d51fbab4b3
furszy:
reACK d51fbab4b3
laanwj:
re-ACK d51fbab4b3
theStack:
ACK d51fbab4b3
Tree-SHA512: 1e7b97edf223b2974eed2e9eac1179fc82bb6359e0a66b7d2a0c8b9fa515eae9ea036f1edf7c76cdab2e75ad994962b134b41056ccfbc33b8d54f0859e86657b
d53d848347 test: adds outbound eviction tests for non outbound-full-relay peers (Sergi Delgado Segura)
a8d9a0edc7 test: adds outbound eviction functional tests, updates comment in ConsiderEviction (Sergi Delgado Segura)
Pull request description:
## Motivation
While checking the outbound eviction code I realized a case was not considered within the comments, which in turn made me realize we had no functional tests for the outbound eviction case (when I went to check/add the test case).
This PR updates the aforementioned comment and adds functional tests to cover the outbound eviction logic, in addition to the existing unit tests found at `src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp`.
ACKs for top commit:
davidgumberg:
reACK d53d848347
tdb3:
Re ACK for d53d848347
achow101:
ACK d53d848347
cbergqvist:
ACK d53d848347
Tree-SHA512: 633b84bb1229fe21e2f650c1beada33ca7f190b64eafd64df2266516d21175e5d652e019ff7114f00cb8bd19f5817dc19e65adf75767a88e24dc0842ce40c63e
e518a8bf8a [functional test] opportunistic 1p1c package submission (glozow)
87c5c524d6 [p2p] opportunistically accept 1-parent-1-child packages (glozow)
6c51e1d7d0 [p2p] add separate rejections cache for reconsiderable txns (glozow)
410ebd6efa [fuzz] break out parent functions and add GetChildrenFrom* coverage (glozow)
d095316c1c [unit test] TxOrphanage::GetChildrenFrom* (glozow)
2f51cd680f [txorphanage] add method to get all orphans spending a tx (glozow)
092c978a42 [txpackages] add canonical way to get hash of package (glozow)
c3c1e15831 [doc] restore comment about why we check if ptx HasWitness before caching rejected txid (glozow)
6f4da19cc3 guard against MempoolAcceptResult::m_replaced_transactions (glozow)
Pull request description:
This enables 1p1c packages to propagate in the "happy case" (i.e. not reliable if there are adversaries) and contains a lot of package relay-related code. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27463 for overall package relay tracking.
Rationale: This is "non-robust 1-parent-1-child package relay" which is immediately useful.
- Relaying 1-parent-1-child CPFP when mempool min feerate is high would be a subset of all package relay use cases, but a pretty significant improvement over what we have today, where such transactions don't propagate at all. [1]
- Today, a miner can run this with a normal/small maxmempool to get revenue from 1p1c CPFP'd transactions without losing out on the ones with parents below mempool minimum feerate.
- The majority of this code is useful for building more featureful/robust package relay e.g. see the code in #27742.
The first 2 commits are followups from #29619:
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29619#discussion_r1523094034
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29619#discussion_r1519819257
Q: What makes this short of a more full package relay feature?
(1) it only supports packages in which 1 of the parents needs to be CPFP'd by the child. That includes 1-parent-1-child packages and situations in which the other parents already pay for themselves (and are thus in mempool already when the package is submitted). More general package relay is a future improvement that requires more engineering in mempool and validation - see #27463.
(2) We rely on having kept the child in orphanage, and don't make any attempt to protect it while we wait to receive the parent. If we are experiencing a lot of orphanage churn (e.g. an adversary is purposefully sending us a lot of transactions with missing inputs), we will fail to submit packages. This limitation has been around for 12+ years, see #27742 which adds a token bucket scheme for protecting package-related orphans at a limited rate per peer.
(3) Our orphan-handling logic is somewhat opportunistic; we don't make much effort to resolve an orphan beyond asking the child's sender for the parents. This means we may miss packages if the first sender fails to give us the parent (intentionally or unintentionally). To make this more robust, we need receiver-side logic to retry orphan resolution with multiple peers. This is also an existing problem which has a proposed solution in #28031.
[1]: see this writeup and its links 02ec218c78/bip-0331.mediawiki (propagate-high-feerate-transactions)
ACKs for top commit:
sr-gi:
tACK e518a8bf8a
instagibbs:
reACK e518a8bf8a
theStack:
Code-review ACK e518a8bf8a📦
dergoegge:
light Code review ACK e518a8bf8a
achow101:
ACK e518a8bf8a
Tree-SHA512: 632579fbe7160cb763bbec6d82ca0dab484d5dbbc7aea90c187c0b9833b8d7c1e5d13b8587379edd3a3b4a02a5a1809020369e9cd09a4ebaf729921f65c15943
Reorganize functional test framework unit tests to run in parallel
with other functional tests.
The option `skipunit` is removed, since unit tests no longer delay
functional test execution.
Unit tests are run by default when running all tests, and can be
run explicitly with `feature_framework_unit_tests.py` when running
a subset of tests.
746b6d8839 test: Add test for createwalletdescriptor (Ava Chow)
2402b63062 wallet: Test upgrade of pre-taproot wallet to have tr() descriptors (Ava Chow)
460ae1bf67 wallet, rpc: Add createwalletdescriptor RPC (Ava Chow)
8e1a475062 wallet: Be able to retrieve single key from descriptors (Ava Chow)
85b1fb19dd wallet: Add GetActiveHDPubKeys to retrieve xpubs from active descriptors (Ava Chow)
73926f2d31 wallet, descspkm: Refactor wallet descriptor generation to standalone func (Andrew Chow)
54e74f46ea wallet: Refactor function for single DescSPKM setup (Andrew Chow)
3b09d0eb7f tests: Test for gethdkeys (Ava Chow)
5febe28c9e wallet, rpc: Add gethdkeys RPC (Ava Chow)
66632e5c24 wallet: Add IsActiveScriptPubKeyMan (Ava Chow)
fa6a259985 desc spkm: Add functions to retrieve specific private keys (Ava Chow)
fe67841464 descriptor: Be able to get the pubkeys involved in a descriptor (Ava Chow)
ef6745879d key: Add constructor for CExtKey that takes CExtPubKey and CKey (Ava Chow)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a `createwalletdescriptor` RPC which allows users to add new automatically generated descriptors to their wallet, e.g. to upgrade a 0.21.x wallet to contain a taproot descriptor. This RPC takes 3 arguments: the output type to create a descriptor for, whether the descriptor will be internal or external, and the HD key to use if the user wishes to use a specific key. The HD key is an optional parameter. If it is not specified, the wallet will use the key shared by the active descriptors, if they are all single key. For most users in the expected upgrade scenario, this should be sufficient. In more advanced cases, the user must specify the HD key to use.
Currently, specified HD keys must already exist in the wallet. To make it easier for the user to know, `gethdkeys` is also added to list out the HD keys in use by all of the descriptors in the wallet. This will include all HD keys, whether we have the private key, for it, which descriptors use it and their activeness, and optionally the extended private key. In this way, users with more complex wallets will be still be able to get HD keys from their wallet for use in other scenarios, and if they want to use `createwalletdescriptor`, they can easily get the keys that they can specify to it.
See also https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26728#issuecomment-1866961865
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-utACK 746b6d8839
furszy:
ACK 746b6d8
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 746b6d8839, and this looks ready to merge. There were various suggested changes since last review where main change seems to be switching `gethdkeys` output to use normalized descriptors (removing hardened path components).
Tree-SHA512: f2849101e6fbf1f59cb031eaaaee97af5b1ae92aaab54c5716940d210f08ab4fc952df2725b636596cd5747b8f5beb1a7a533425bc10d09da02659473516fbda
2f23987849 test: p2p: check limited peers desirability (depending on best block depth) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
c4a67d396d test: p2p: check disconnect due to lack of desirable service flags (Sebastian Falbesoner)
405ac819af test: p2p: support disconnect waiting for `add_outbound_p2p_connection` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds missing test coverage for disconnecting peers which don't offer the desirable service flags in their VERSION message:
5f3a0574c4/src/net_processing.cpp (L3384-L3389)
This check is relevant for the connection types "outbound-full-relay", "block-relay-only" and "addr-fetch" (see `CNode::ExpectServicesFromConn(...)`). Feeler connections always disconnect, which is also tested here.
In lack of finding a proper file where this test would fit in, I created a new one. Happy to take suggestions there.
ACKs for top commit:
davidgumberg:
reACK 2f23987849
itornaza:
tested ACK 2f23987849
fjahr:
re-utACK 2f23987849
cbergqvist:
re ACK 2f23987849
stratospher:
tested ACK 2f23987. 🚀
Tree-SHA512: cf75d9d4379d0f34fa1e13152e6a8d93cd51b9573466ab3a2fec32dc3e1ac49b174bd1063cae558bc736b111c8a6e7058b1b57a496df56255221bf367d29eb5d
Remove the num_running variable as it can be implied by the
length of the jobs list.
Remove the i variable as it can be implied by the length of the
test_results list.
Instead of counting results to determine if finished, make the
queue object itself responsible (by looking at running jobs and
jobs left).
Originally proposed by @sipa in PR #23995.
Co-authored-by: Pieter Wuille <pieter@wuille.net>
ecc036c5d6 ci: add --v2transport to an existing CI job (Martin Zumsande)
3a25a575f0 test: ignore --v2transport for older versions instead of asserting (Martin Zumsande)
547aacff08 test: add -v1transport option and use it in test_runner (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
This suggests a strategy to run the functional tests with both v1 and v2 transport in the CI.
**Status Quo:**
There is both the global `--v2transport` option for the `test_runner.py` (not enabled by default), plus the possibility to specify `--v2transport` for particular tests, which is used for a handful of tests. Currently, when running `test_runner.py --v2transport`, these tests are run twice with the same `--v2transport` configuration, as has been noted in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29358#discussion_r1485626063, which is wasteful.
**Suggested Change:**
Fix this by adding a `--v1transport` option and using it in `test_runner.py`, so that irrespective of the global `--v2transport` flag, the tests that run twice use v1 in one run and v2 in the other.
Also add `--v2transport` to one CI task (`multiprocess, i686, DEBUG`).
This means, that for each CI task, the majority of functional tests will run once using the global `--v2transport` option if provided, while a few selected tests will always run two times, once with `v1` and once with `v2`.
**Rationale:**
A simpler alternative would have been to remove all test-specific `--v2transport` commands from `test_runner.py` and just enable `--v2transport` option for a few CI tasks. I didn't do that because it would have meant that v2 would never be running in the CI for some platforms, and also be run a lot less locally by users and devs (who would have to actively enable the `--v2transport` option).
ACKs for top commit:
tdb3:
ACK for ecc036c5d6.
achow101:
ACK ecc036c5d6
stratospher:
ACK ecc036c.
vasild:
ACK ecc036c5d6
Tree-SHA512: 375b2293d49991f2fbd8e1bb646c0034004a09cee36063bc32996b721323eb19a43d7b2f36b3f9a3fdca846d74f48d8f1387565c03ef5d34b3481d2a0fe1d328
Early key response test is a special kind of test which requires
modified v2 handshake functions. More such tests can be added
where v2 handshake functions send incorrect garbage terminator,
excess garbage bytes etc.. Hence, rename p2p_v2_earlykey.py to a
general test file name - p2p_v2_misbehaving.py.
random_bitflip function (used in signature tests prior to this
commit) can be used in p2p_v2_misbehaving test to generate wrong
garbage terminator, wrong garbage bytes etc..
So, move the function to util.
This option beats the --v2transport option and is meant to be used in
test_runner.py.
It applies these to a few tests that are particulary interesting
in terms of the transport type.
This ensures that these tests arei always run with both v1 and v2, irrespective of
whether the global --v2transport test_runner option is set or not.
d8087adc7e [test] IsBlockMutated unit tests (dergoegge)
1ed2c98297 Add transaction_identifier::size to allow Span conversion (dergoegge)
1ec6bbeb8d [validation] Cache merkle root and witness commitment checks (dergoegge)
5bf4f5ba32 [test] Add regression test for #27608 (dergoegge)
49257c0304 [net processing] Don't process mutated blocks (dergoegge)
2d8495e080 [validation] Merkle root malleation should be caught by IsBlockMutated (dergoegge)
66abce1d98 [validation] Introduce IsBlockMutated (dergoegge)
e7669e1343 [refactor] Cleanup merkle root checks (dergoegge)
95bddb930a [validation] Isolate merkle root checks (dergoegge)
Pull request description:
This PR proposes to check for mutated blocks early as a defense-in-depth mitigation against attacks leveraging mutated blocks.
We introduce `IsBlockMutated` which catches all known forms of block malleation and use it to do an early mutation check whenever we receive a `block` message.
We have observed attacks that abused mutated blocks in the past, which could have been prevented by simply not processing mutated blocks (e.g. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27608 for which a regression test is included in this PR).
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK d8087adc7e
maflcko:
ACK d8087adc7e🏄
fjahr:
Code review ACK d8087adc7e
sr-gi:
Code review ACK d8087adc7e
Tree-SHA512: 618ff4ea7f168e10f07504d3651290efbb1bb2ab3b838ffff3527c028caf6c52dedad18d04d3dbc627977479710930e200f2dfae18a08f627efe7e64a57e535f
29029df5c7 [doc] v3 signaling in mempool-replacements.md (glozow)
e643ea795e [fuzz] v3 transactions and sigop-adjusted vsize (glozow)
1fd16b5c62 [functional test] v3 transaction submission (glozow)
27c8786ba9 test framework: Add and use option for tx-version in MiniWallet methods (MarcoFalke)
9a1fea55b2 [policy/validation] allow v3 transactions with certain restrictions (glozow)
eb8d5a2e7d [policy] add v3 policy rules (glozow)
9a29d470fb [rpc] return full string for package_msg and package-error (glozow)
158623b8e0 [refactor] change Workspace::m_conflicts and adjacent funcs/structs to use Txid (glozow)
Pull request description:
See #27463 for overall package relay tracking.
Delving Bitcoin discussion thread: https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/v3-transaction-policy-for-anti-pinning/340
Delving Bitcoin discussion for LN usage: https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/lightning-transactions-with-v3-and-ephemeral-anchors/418
Rationale:
- There are various pinning problems with RBF and our general ancestor/descendant limits. These policies help mitigate many pinning attacks and make package RBF feasible (see #28984 which implements package RBF on top of this). I would focus the most here on Rule 3 pinning. [1][2]
- Switching to a cluster-based mempool (see #27677 and #28676) requires the removal of CPFP carve out, which applications depend on. V3 + package RBF + ephemeral anchors + 1-parent-1-child package relay provides an intermediate solution.
V3 policy is for "Priority Transactions." [3][4] It allows users to opt in to more restrictive topological limits for shared transactions, in exchange for the more robust fee-bumping abilities that offers. Even though we don't have cluster limits, we are able to treat these transactions as having as having a maximum cluster size of 2.
Immediate benefits:
- You can presign a transaction with 0 fees (not just 1sat/vB!) and add a fee-bump later.
- Rule 3 pinning is reduced by a significant amount, since the attacker can only attach a maximum of 1000vB to your shared transaction.
This also enables some other cool things (again see #27463 for overall roadmap):
- Ephemeral Anchors
- Package RBF for these 1-parent-1-child packages. That means e.g. a commitment tx + child can replace another commitment tx using the child's fees.
- We can transition to a "single anchor" universe without worrying about package limit pinning. So current users of CPFP carve out would have something else to use.
- We can switch to a cluster-based mempool [5] (#27677#28676), which removes CPFP carve out [6].
[1]: Original mailing list post and discussion about RBF pinning problems https://gist.github.com/glozow/25d9662c52453bd08b4b4b1d3783b9ff, https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-January/019817.html
[2]: A FAQ is "we need this for cluster mempool, but is this still necessary afterwards?" There are some pinning issues that are fixed here and not fully fixed in cluster mempool, so we will still want this or something similar afterward.
[3]: Mailing list post for v3 https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-September/020937.html
[4]: Original PR #25038 also contains a lot of the discussion
[5]: https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/an-overview-of-the-cluster-mempool-proposal/393/7
[6]: https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/an-overview-of-the-cluster-mempool-proposal/393#the-cpfp-carveout-rule-can-no-longer-be-supported-12
ACKs for top commit:
sdaftuar:
ACK 29029df5c7
achow101:
ACK 29029df5c7
instagibbs:
ACK 29029df5c7 modulo that
Tree-SHA512: 9664b078890cfdca2a146439f8835c9d9ab483f43b30af8c7cd6962f09aa557fb1ce7689d5e130a2ec142235dbc8f21213881baa75241c5881660f9008d68450
When initiating a v2 connection and being immediately disconnected,
a node cannot know if the disconnect happens because the peer only
supports v1, or because it has banned you, so it schedules to reconnect with v1.
If the test doesn't wait for that, the reconnect can happen at a bad time,
resulting in failure in a later connect_nodes call.
Also add the test with --v2transport to the test runner.
bc9283c441 [test] Add functional test to test early key response behaviour in BIP 324 (stratospher)
ffe6a56d75 [test] Check whether v2 TestNode performs downgrading (stratospher)
ba737358a3 [test] Add functional tests to test v2 P2P behaviour (stratospher)
4115cf9956 [test] Ignore BIP324 decoy messages (stratospher)
8c054aa04d [test] Allow inbound and outbound connections supporting v2 P2P protocol (stratospher)
382894c3ac [test] Reconnect using v1 P2P when v2 P2P terminates due to magic byte mismatch (stratospher)
a94e350ac0 [test] Build v2 P2P messages (stratospher)
bb7bffed79 [test] Use lock for sending P2P messages in test framework (stratospher)
5b91fb14ab [test] Read v2 P2P messages (stratospher)
05bddb20f5 [test] Perform initial v2 handshake (stratospher)
a049d1bd08 [test] Introduce EncryptedP2PState object in P2PConnection (stratospher)
b89fa59e71 [test] Construct class to handle v2 P2P protocol functions (stratospher)
8d6c848a48 [test] Move MAGIC_BYTES to messages.py (stratospher)
595ad4b168 [test/crypto] Add ECDH (stratospher)
4487b80517 [rpc/net] Allow v2 p2p support in addconnection (stratospher)
Pull request description:
This PR introduces support for v2 P2P encryption(BIP 324) in the existing functional test framework and adds functional tests for the same.
### commits overview
1. introduces a new class `EncryptedP2PState` to store the keys, functions for performing the initial v2 handshake and encryption/decryption.
3. this class is used by `P2PConnection` in inbound/outbound connections to perform the initial v2 handshake before the v1 version handshake. Only after the initial v2 handshake is performed do application layer P2P messages(version, verack etc..) get exchanged. (in a v2 connection)
- `v2_state` is the object of class `EncryptedP2PState` in `P2PConnection` used to store its keys, session-id etc.
- a node [advertising](https://github.com/stratospher/blogosphere/blob/main/integration_test_bip324.md#advertising-to-support-v2-p2p) support for v2 P2P is different from a node actually [supporting v2 P2P](https://github.com/stratospher/blogosphere/blob/main/integration_test_bip324.md#supporting-v2-p2p) (differ when false advertisement of services occur)
- introduce a boolean variable `supports_v2_p2p` in `P2PConnection` to denote if it supports v2 P2P.
- introduce a boolean variable `advertises_v2_p2p` to denote whether `P2PConnection` which mimics peer behaviour advertises V2 P2P support. Default option is `False`.
- In the test framework, you can create Inbound and Outbound connections to `TestNode`
1. During **Inbound Connections**, `P2PConnection` is the initiator [`TestNode` <--------- `P2PConnection`]
- Case 1:
- if the `TestNode` advertises/signals v2 P2P support (means `self.nodes[i]` set up with `"-v2transport=1"`), different behaviour will be exhibited based on whether:
1. `P2PConnection` supports v2 P2P
2. `P2PConnection` does not support v2 P2P
- In a real world scenario, the initiator node would intrinsically know if they support v2 P2P based on whatever code they choose to run. However, in the test scenario where we mimic peer behaviour, we have no way of knowing if `P2PConnection` should support v2 P2P or not. So `supports_v2_p2p` boolean variable is used as an option to enable support for v2 P2P in `P2PConnection`.
- Since the `TestNode` advertises v2 P2P support (using "-v2transport=1"), our initiator `P2PConnection` would send:
1. (if the `P2PConnection` supports v2 P2P) ellswift + garbage bytes to initiate the connection
2. (if the `P2PConnection` does not support v2 P2P) version message to initiate the connection
- Case 2:
- if the `TestNode` doesn't signal v2 P2P support; `P2PConnection` being the initiator would send version message to initiate a connection.
2. During **Outbound Connections** [TestNode --------> P2PConnection]
- initiator `TestNode` would send:
- (if the `P2PConnection` advertises v2 P2P) ellswift + garbage bytes to initiate the connection
- (if the `P2PConnection` advertises v2 P2P) version message to initiate the connection
- Suppose `P2PConnection` advertises v2 P2P support when it actually doesn't support v2 P2P (false advertisement scenario)
- `TestNode` sends ellswift + garbage bytes
- `P2PConnection` receives but can't process it and disconnects.
- `TestNode` then tries using v1 P2P and sends version message
- `P2PConnection` receives/processes this successfully and they communicate on v1 P2P
4. the encrypted P2P messages follow a different format - 3 byte length + 1-13 byte message_type + payload + 16 byte MAC
5. includes support for testing decoy messages and v2 connection downgrade(using false advertisement - when a v2 node makes an outbound connection to a node which doesn't support v2 but is advertised as v2 by some malicious
intermediary)
### run the tests
* functional test - `test/functional/p2p_v2_encrypted.py` `test/functional/p2p_v2_earlykeyresponse.py`
I'm also super grateful to @ dhruv for his really valuable feedback on this branch.
Also written a more elaborate explanation here - https://github.com/stratospher/blogosphere/blob/main/integration_test_bip324.md
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK bc9283c441
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK bc9283c441
theStack:
Code-review ACK bc9283c441
glozow:
ACK bc9283c441
Tree-SHA512: 9b54ed27e925e1775e0e0d35e959cdbf2a9a1aab7bcf5d027e66f8b59780bdd0458a7a4311ddc7dd67657a4a2a2cd5034ead75524420d58a83f642a8304c9811
- A node initiates a v2 connection by sending 64 bytes ellswift
- In BIP 324 "The responder waits until one byte is received which does not match the
V1_PREFIX (16 bytes consisting of the network magic followed by "version\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00".)"
- It's possible that the 64 bytes ellswift sent by an initiator starts with a prefix of V1_PREFIX
- Example form of 64 bytes ellswift could be:
4 bytes network magic + 60 bytes which aren't prefixed with remaining V1_PREFIX
- We test this behaviour:
- when responder receives 4 byte network magic -> no response received by initiator
- when first mismatch happens -> response received by initiator
If the serialized transaction passed to `fundrawtransaction` contains
duplicates, they will be deserialized and added to the transaction. Add
a test to ensure this behavior is not changed during the refactor.
A user can pass any number of duplicated and unrelated addresses as an
SFFO argument to `sendmany` and the RPC will not throw an error (note,
all the rest of the RPCs which take SFFO as an argument will error if
the user passes duplicates or specifies outputs not present in the
transaction). Add a test to ensure this behavior is not changed during
the refactor.
df30247705 [test] import descriptor wallet with reorged parent + IsFromMe child in mempool (glozow)
c3d02be536 [test] rescan legacy wallet with reorged parent + IsFromMe child in mempool (Gloria Zhao)
Pull request description:
Originally motivated by #29019, which reverts back to having `requestMempoolTransactions` emit `transactionAddedToMempool` in `mapTx` default order instead of `GetSortedDepthAndScore` order.
It's important that these notifications happen in topological order, otherwise the wallet rescan may miss transactions that belong to it. Notably, checking whether a transaction `IsFromMe` requires knowing its inputs, which may be from a mempool parent.
When using `mapTx` order, a parent may come later than its child if it was added from a block disconnected in a reorg.
This PR adds a test for this case.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK df30247705
furszy:
Code review ACK df30247705, nits can be disregarded.
Tree-SHA512: 2f1d9ef92313228adbbef94e634e5f7a9ec6e6a2c88e16aa343bdc95ffc9b9f9c82a569b412c9a3841db9d789e52f9283e8b9385731668d59355903e26e58a5d
Test that wallet rescans process transactions topologically, even if a
parent's entry into the mempool is later than that of its child.
This behavior is important because IsFromMe requires the ability to look
up a transaction's inputs.
Co-authored-by: furszy <matiasfurszyfer@protonmail.com>
878d914777 doc: test: mention OS detection preferences in style guideline (Sebastian Falbesoner)
4c65ac96f8 test: detect OS consistently using `platform.system()` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
37324ae3df test: use `skip_if_platform_not_linux` helper where possible (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
There are at least three ways to detect the operating system in Python3:
- `os.name` (https://docs.python.org/3.9/library/os.html#os.name)
- `sys.platform` (https://docs.python.org/3.9/library/sys.html#sys.platform)
- `platform.system()` (https://docs.python.org/3.9/library/platform.html#platform.system)
We are currently using all of them in functional tests (both in individual tests and shared test framework code), which seems a bit messy. This PR consolidates into using `platform.system()`, as it appears to be one most consistent and easy to read (see also [IRC discussion](https://bitcoin-irc.chaincode.com/bitcoin-core-dev/2023-12-08#989301;) and table below). `sys.platform` is inconsistent as it has the major version number encoded for BSD systems, which doesn't make much sense for e.g. OpenBSD, where there is no concept of major versions, but instead the version is simply increased by 0.1 on each release.
Note that `os.name` is still useful to detect whether we are running a POSIX system (see `BitcoinTestFramework.skip_if_platform_not_posix`), so for this use-case it is kept as only exception. The following table shows values for common operating systems, found via
```
$ python3 -c "import os; import sys; import platform; print(os.name, sys.platform, platform.system())"
```
| OS | os.name | sys.platform | platform.system() |
|--------------|---------|--------------|--------------------|
| Linux 6.2.0 | posix | linux | Linux |
| MacOS* | posix | darwin | Darwin |
| OpenBSD 7.4 | posix | openbsd7 | OpenBSD |
| Windows* | nt | win32 | Windows |
\* = I neither have a MacOS nor a Windows machine available, so I extracted the values from documentation and our current code. Also I'm relying on CI for testing the relevant code-paths. Having reviewers to this this locally would be very appreciated, if this gets Concept ACKed.
ACKs for top commit:
kevkevinpal:
ACK [878d914](878d914777)
achow101:
ACK 878d914777
hebasto:
ACK 878d914777, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK.
pablomartin4btc:
tACK 878d914777
Tree-SHA512: 24513d493e47f572028c843260b81c47c2c29bfb701991050255c9f9529cd19065ecbc7b3b6e15619da7f3f608b4825c345ce6fee30d8fd1eaadbd08cff400fc
997b9a73e5 test: add assumeutxo wallet test (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Extracted from #28616, this adds a (very) basic wallet test for assume utxo. It checks some circumstances where a backup can and can't be loaded.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 997b9a73e5
achow101:
ACK 997b9a73e5
theStack:
Code-review ACK 997b9a73e5
Tree-SHA512: 69474e56c6a46bb4f30fc54f8e5844766ac2a5f8226bb0b168d11ae1e3d4eae58570c1f1b4cc2b2f6f51b5d0e055bbe2bbd11684265215e01d4eb81ab4b7b0bb
1ce45baed7 rpc: getwalletinfo, return wallet 'birthtime' (furszy)
83c66444d0 test: coverage for wallet birth time interaction with -reindex (furszy)
6f497377aa wallet: fix legacy spkm default birth time (furszy)
75fbf444c1 wallet: birth time update during tx scanning (furszy)
b4306e3c8d refactor: rename FirstKeyTimeChanged to MaybeUpdateBirthTime (furszy)
Pull request description:
Fixing #28897.
As the user may have imported a descriptor with a timestamp newer
than the actual birth time of the first key (by setting 'timestamp=now'),
the wallet needs to update the birth time when it detects a transaction
older than the oldest descriptor timestamp.
Testing Notes:
Can cherry-pick the test commit on top of master. It will fail there.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-utACK 1ce45baed7
achow101:
ACK 1ce45baed7
Tree-SHA512: 10c2382f87356ae9ea3fcb637d7edc5ed0e51e13cc2729c314c9ffb57c684b9ac3c4b757b85810c0a674020b7287c43d3be8273bcf75e2aff0cc1c037f1159f9
Verifying the wallet updates the birth time accordingly when it
detects a transaction with a time older than the oldest descriptor
timestamp.
This could happen when the user blindly imports a descriptor with
'timestamp=now'.
35fb9930ad test: enable v2 transport for p2p_timeouts.py (Martin Zumsande)
2c1669c37a test: enable v2 transport for rpc_net.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
cc961c2695 test: enable v2 transport for p2p_node_network_limited.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
3598a1b5c9 test: enable --v2transport in combination with --usecli (Martin Zumsande)
68a9001751 test: persist -v2transport over restarts and respect -v2transport=0 (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
This makes the functional test suite compatible with BIP324, so that
`python3 test_runner.py --v2transport`
should succeed (currently, 12 tests fail for me on master).
Includes two commits by TheStack I found in an old discussion https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28331#discussion_r1326714164
Note that even though all tests should pass, the python `p2p.py` module will do v2 connections only after the merge of #24748, so that for now only connections between two full nodes will actually run v2.
Some of the fixed tests were added with `--v2transport` to the test runner. Though after #24748 we might also want to consider running the entire suite with `--v2transport` in some CI.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 35fb9930ad. Thanks for taking care of this.
achow101:
ACK 35fb9930ad
theStack:
ACK 35fb9930ad
stratospher:
ACK 35fb993.
Tree-SHA512: 80dc0bf211fa525ff1d092043aea9f222f14c02e5832a548fb8b83b9ede1fcee03c5e8ade0d05c331bdaa492af9c1cf3d0f0b15b846673c6eacea82dd4cefbc3
- "transport_protocol_type" of inbound peer before version handshake
is "detecting" on p2p v2 nodes (as opposed to "v1" for p2p v1)
- size of a ping/pong message is 29 bytes (as opposed to 32 for p2p v1)
- for the sendmsgtopeer RPC sub-test, enforce p2p v1 connection to
have a peer id of zero
