- LIBLEVELDB_SSE42_INT was defined, but never referenced anywhere
- LIBLEVELDB_SSE42 is referenced, but never defined anywhere
Apparently leveldb used to have platform-specific crc32 code before it
got split off into a separate lib.
54b39cfb34 Add release notes (stickies-v)
f959fc0397 Update /<count>/ endpoints to use a '?count=' query parameter instead (stickies-v)
a09497614e Add GetQueryParameter helper function (stickies-v)
fff771ee86 Handle query string when parsing data format (stickies-v)
c1aad1b3b9 scripted-diff: rename RetFormat to RESTResponseFormat (stickies-v)
9f1c54787c Refactoring: move declarations to rest.h (stickies-v)
Pull request description:
In RESTful APIs, [typically](https://rapidapi.com/blog/api-glossary/parameters/query/) path parameters (e.g. `/some/unique/resource/`) are used to represent resources, and query parameters (e.g. `?sort=asc`) are used to control how these resources are being loaded through e.g. sorting, pagination, filtering, ...
As first [discussed in #17631](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17631#discussion_r733031180), the [current REST api](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/REST-interface.md) contains two endpoints `/headers/` and `/blockfilterheaders/` that rather unexpectedly use path parameters to control how many (filter) headers are returned in the response. While this is no critical issue, it is unintuitive and we are still early enough to easily phase this behaviour out and ensure new endpoints (if any) do not have to stick to non-standard behaviour just for internal consistency.
In this PR, a new `HTTPRequest::GetQueryParameter` method is introduced to easily parse query parameters, as well as two new `/headers/` and `/blockfilterheaders/` endpoints that use a count query parameter are introduced. The old path parameter-based endpoints are kept without too much overhead, but the documentation now points to the new query parameter-based endpoints as the default interface to encourage standardness.
## Behaviour change
### New endpoints and default values
`/headers/` and `/blockfilterheaders/` now have 2 new endpoints that contain query parameters (`?count=<count>`) instead of path parameters (`/<count>/`), as described in REST-interface.md. Since query parameters can easily have default values, I have set this at 5 for both endpoints.
**headers**
`GET /rest/headers/<BLOCK-HASH>.<bin|hex|json>?count=<COUNT=5>`
should now be used instead of
`GET /rest/headers/<COUNT>/<BLOCK-HASH>.<bin|hex|json>`
**blockfilterheaders**
`GET /rest/blockfilterheaders/<FILTERTYPE>/<BLOCK-HASH>.<bin|hex|json>?count=<COUNT=5>`
should now be used instead of
`GET /rest/blockfilterheaders/<FILTERTYPE>/<COUNT>/<BLOCK-HASH>.<bin|hex|json>`
### Some previously invalid API calls are now valid
API calls that contained query strings in the URI could not be parsed prior to this PR. This PR changes behaviour in that previously invalid calls (e.g. `GET /rest/headers/5/somehash.json?someunusedparam=foo`) would now become valid, as the query parameters are properly parsed, and discarded if unused.
For example, prior to this PR, adding an irrelevant `someparam` parameter would be illegal:
```
GET /rest/headers/5/0000004c6aad0c89c1c060e8e116dcd849e0554935cd78ff9c6a398abeac6eda.json?someparam=true
->
Invalid hash: 0000004c6aad0c89c1c060e8e116dcd849e0554935cd78ff9c6a398abeac6eda.json?someparam=true
```
**This behaviour change affects all rest endpoints, not just the 2 new ones introduced here.**
*(Note: I'd be open to implementing additional logic to refuse requests containing unrecognized query parameters to minimize behaviour change, but for the endpoints that we currently have I don't really see the point for that added complexity. E.g. I don't see any scenarios where misspelling a parameter could lead to harmful outcomes)*
## Using the REST API
To run the API HTTP server, start a bitcoind instance with the `-rest` flag enabled. To use the
`blockfilterheaders` endpoint, you'll also need to set `-blockfilterindex=1`:
```
./bitcoind -signet -rest -blockfilterindex=1
```
As soon as bitcoind is fully up and running, you should be able to query the API, for example by
using curl on the command line: ```curl "127.0.0.1:38332/rest/chaininfo.json"```.
To more easily parse the JSON output, you can also use tools like 'jq' or `json_pp`, e.g.:
```
curl -s "localhost:38332/rest/blockfilterheaders/basic/0000004c6aad0c89c1c060e8e116dcd849e0554935cd78ff9c6a398abeac6eda.json?count=2" | json_pp .
```
## To do
- [x] update `doc/release-notes`
## Feedback
This is my first PR (hooray!). Please don't hold back on any feedback/comments/nits/... you may have, big or small, whether they are code, process, language, ... related. I welcome private messages too if there's anything you don't want to clutter the PR with. I'm here to learn and am grateful for everyone's input.
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
I've had to push a tiny doc update to `REST-interface.md` (`git range-diff 219d728 9aac438 54b39cf`) since this was not merged for v23, but since there are no significant changes beyond theStack and jnewbery's ACKs I think this PR is now ready to be considered for merging? @MarcoFalke
jnewbery:
ACK 54b39cfb34
theStack:
re-ACK 54b39cfb34
Tree-SHA512: 3b393ffde34f25605ca12c0b1300799a19684b816a1d03aed38b0f5439df47bfe6a589ffbcd7b83fd2def6c9d00a1bae5e45b1d18df4ae998c617c709990f83f
2da94a4c6f fuzz: add a fuzz target for Miniscript decoding from Script (Antoine Poinsot)
f8369996e7 Miniscript: ops limit and stack size computation (Pieter Wuille)
2e55e88f86 Miniscript: conversion from script (Pieter Wuille)
1ddaa66eae Miniscript: type system, script creation, text notation, tests (Pieter Wuille)
4fe29368c0 script: expose getter for CScriptNum, add a BuildScript helper (Antoine Poinsot)
f4e289f384 script: move CheckMinimalPush from interpreter to script.h (Antoine Poinsot)
31ec6ae92a script: make IsPushdataOp non-static (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
Miniscript is a language for writing (a subset of) Bitcoin Scripts in a structured way.
Miniscript permits:
- To safely extend the Output Descriptor language to many more scripting features thanks to the typing system (composition).
- Statical analysis of spending conditions, maximum spending cost of each branch, security properties, third-party malleability.
- General satisfaction of any correctly typed ("valid" [0]) Miniscript. The satisfaction itself is also analyzable.
- To extend the possibilities of external signers, because of all of the above and since it carries enough metadata.
Miniscript guarantees:
- That for any statically-analyzed as "safe" [0] Script, a witness can be constructed in the bounds of the consensus and standardness rules (standardness complete).
- That unless the conditions of the Miniscript are met, no witness can be created for the Script (consensus sound).
- Third-party malleability protection for the satisfaction of a sane Miniscript, which is too complex to summarize here.
For more details around Miniscript (including the specifications), please refer to the [website](https://bitcoin.sipa.be/miniscript/).
Miniscript was designed by Pieter Wuille, Andrew Poelstra and Sanket Kanjalkar.
This PR is an updated and rebased version of #16800. See [the commit history of the Miniscript repository](https://github.com/sipa/miniscript/commits/master) for details about the changes made since September 2019 (TL;DR: bugfixes, introduction of timelock conflicts in the type system, `pk()` and `pkh()` aliases, `thresh_m` renamed to `multi`, all recursive algorithms were made non-recursive).
This PR is also the first in a series of 3:
- The first one (here) integrates the backbone of Miniscript.
- The second one (#24148) introduces support for Miniscript in Output Descriptors, allowing for watch-only support of Miniscript Descriptors in the wallet.
- The third one (#24149) implements signing for these Miniscript Descriptors, using Miniscript's satisfaction algorithm.
Note to reviewers:
- Miniscript is currently defined only for P2WSH. No Taproot yet.
- Miniscript is different from the policy language (a high-level logical representation of a spending policy). A policy->Miniscript compiler is not included here.
- The fuzz target included here is more interestingly extended in the 3rd PR to check a script's satisfaction against `VerifyScript`. I think it could be further improved by having custom mutators as we now have for multisig (see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/23105). A minified corpus of Miniscript Scripts is available at https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets/pull/85.
[0] We call "valid" any correctly-typed Miniscript. And "safe" any sane Miniscript, ie one whose satisfaction isn't malleable, which requires a key for any spending path, etc..
ACKs for top commit:
jb55:
ACK 2da94a4c6f
laanwj:
Light code review ACK 2da94a4c6f (mostly reviewed the changes to the existing code and build system)
Tree-SHA512: d3ef558436cfcc699a50ad13caf1e776f7d0addddb433ee28ef38f66ea5c3e581382d8c748ccac9b51768e4b95712ed7a6112b0e3281a6551e0f325331de9167
21520b9551 fuzz: add target for coinselection (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
This adds a fuzz target for the coinselection algorithms by creating random `OutputGroup`s and running all three coin selection algorithms for them.
It does not fuzz higher-level wallet logic for selecting eligible coins (as in `SelectCoins()`), thought it probably would make sense to have a fuzz target for that too.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 21520b9551
vasild:
ACK 21520b9551
Tree-SHA512: c763003cf5ff5317f929d3d0b2f06fa739ae41dd642042d9a5c5c96e6cb9b349a6c7aeabc77bc2b846d12c8bcb60e07ee20a9f38539429c65723ab76aeee6b2e
f8cba0d911 test: Change default test logging directory (Yancy Ribbens)
Pull request description:
This PR changes the default test log location request here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/17224. Instead of using the location of the makefile [automatic variable](https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/make.html#Automatic-Variables) `$<` I extract just the basename and then prepend a new location `./test`. This is done because `$<` represents the variable name AND location of the prerequisite here.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: f0fbc530cf0e14c284b4bbf6671c145b1d7a2e1f5561f5c5d09f0cbe88b98e620e763bbbf2dfa9aeeec3dcc9b0127939e105e14c7e4f6660c7c19663622a393d
More information about Miniscript can be found at https://bitcoin.sipa.be/miniscript/ (the
website source is hosted at https://github.com/sipa/miniscript/).
This commit defines all fragments, their composition, parsing from
string representation and conversion to Script.
Co-Authored-By: Antoine Poinsot <darosior@protonmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Sanket Kanjalkar <sanket1729@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Samuel Dobson <dobsonsa68@gmail.com>
bce9aaf31e Unit tests for IsWitnessProgram and IsP2WSH. (Daniel Kraft)
Pull request description:
This adds basic unit tests for `CScript::IsPayToWitnessScriptHash` and `CScript::IsWitnessProgram`, similar to the existing tests for `CScript::IsPayToScriptHash`. These tests are probably not super important given the other existing tests for segwit related code, but may be useful in catching some errors early.
This implements #14737.
ACKs for top commit:
aureleoules:
tACK bce9aaf31e (`make check)`.
Tree-SHA512: 3cff5efc4ac53079289c72bfba8b1937bc103baadd32bb1fba41e78017f65f9cca17678c3202ad0711eae42b351d4132d9ed9b4e2dc07d138298691a09c4e822
URLs may contain a query string (prefixed with '?') and this should be ignored when parsing
the data format.
To facilitate testing this functionality, ParseDataFormat has been made non-static.
4d0ac72f3a [fuzz] Add fuzzing harness to compare both implementations of ChaCha20 (stratospher)
65ef93203c [fuzz] Add D. J. Bernstein's implementation of ChaCha20 (stratospher)
Pull request description:
This PR compares Bitcoin Core's implementation of ChaCha20 with D. J. Bernstein's in order to find implementation discrepancies if any.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 4d0ac72f3a
Tree-SHA512: f826144b4db61b9cbdd7efaaca8fa9cbb899953065bc8a26820a566303b2ab6a17431e7c114635789f0a63fbe3b65cb0bf2ab85baf882803a5ee172af4881544
d8ee8f3cd3 refactor: Make CWalletTx sync state type-safe (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Current `CWalletTx` state representation makes it possible to set inconsistent states that won't be handled correctly by wallet sync code or serialized & deserialized back into the same form.
For example, it is possible to call `setConflicted` without setting a conflicting block hash, or `setConfirmed` with no transaction index. And it's possible update individual `m_confirm` and `fInMempool` data fields without setting an overall consistent state that can be serialized and handled correctly.
Fix this without changing behavior by using `std::variant`, instead of an enum and collection of fields, to represent sync state, so state tracking code is safer and more legible.
This is a first step to fixing state tracking bugs https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-devwiki/wiki/Wallet-Transaction-Conflict-Tracking, by adding an extra margin of safety that can prevent new bugs from being introduced as existing bugs are fixed.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
re-ACK d8ee8f3cd3
jonatack:
Code review ACK d8ee8f3cd3
Tree-SHA512: b9f15e9d99dbdbdd3ef7a76764e11f66949f50e6227e284126f209e4cb106af6d55e9a9e8c7d4aa216ddc92c6d5acc6f4aa4746f209bbd77f03831b51a2841c3
faba1abe46 Sort file list after rename (MarcoFalke)
fa8f60e311 scripted-diff: Move minisketchwrapper to src/node (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The newly added wrapper is currently in the node library, but not placed in the node directory. While it is possible to use the wrapper outside of a node context (for example in a utility), it seems unlikely. Either way, I think the wrapper should either be moved to the util lib+dir or the node lib+dir, not something in-between.
Also, fix incorrect comment `BITCOIN_DBWRAPPER_H`.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK faba1abe46. I saw the comment in #21515, however given there hasn't been any new activity there, I'm going to merge this now.
Tree-SHA512: fccc0cfd1fee661152a1378587b96795ffb7a7eceb6d2c27ea5401993fd8b9c0a92579fdba61203917ae6565269cb28d0973464fb6201dabf72a5143495d3e77
Current CWalletTx state representation makes it possible to set
inconsistent states that won't be handled correctly by wallet sync code
or serialized & deserialized back into the same form.
For example, it is possible to call setConflicted without setting a
conflicting block hash, or setConfirmed with no transaction index. And
it's possible update individual m_confirm and fInMempool data fields
without setting an overall consistent state that can be serialized and
handled correctly.
Fix this without changing behavior by using std::variant, instead of an
enum and collection of fields, to represent sync state, so state
tracking code is safer and more legible.
This is a first step to fixing state tracking bugs
https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-devwiki/wiki/Wallet-Transaction-Conflict-Tracking,
by adding an extra margin of safety that can prevent new bugs from being
introduced as existing bugs are fixed.
29173d6c6c ubsan: add minisketch exceptions (Cory Fields)
54b5e1aeab Add thin Minisketch wrapper to pick best implementation (Pieter Wuille)
ee9dc71c1b Add basic minisketch tests (Pieter Wuille)
0659f12b13 Add minisketch dependency (Gleb Naumenko)
0eb7928ab8 Add MSVC build configuration for libminisketch (Pieter Wuille)
8bc166d5b1 build: add minisketch build file and include it (Cory Fields)
b2904ceb85 build: add configure checks for minisketch (Cory Fields)
b6487dc4ef Squashed 'src/minisketch/' content from commit 89629eb2c7 (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This takes over #21859, which has [recently switched](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21859#issuecomment-921899200) to my integration branch. A few more build issues came up (and have been fixed) since, and after discussing with sipa it was decided I would open a PR to shepherd any final changes through.
> This adds a `src/minisketch` subtree, taken from the master branch of https://github.com/sipa/minisketch, to prepare for Erlay implementation (see #21515). It gets configured for just supporting 32-bit fields (the only ones we're interested in in the context of Erlay), and some code on top is added:
> * A very basic unit test (just to make sure compilation & running works; actual correctness checking is done through minisketch's own tests).
> * A wrapper in `minisketchwrapper.{cpp,h}` that runs a benchmark to determine which field implementation to use.
Only changes since my last update to the branch in the previous PR have been rebasing on master and fixing an issue with a header in an introduced file.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK 29173d6c6c
Tree-SHA512: 1217d3228db1dd0de12c2919314e1c3626c18a416cf6291fec99d37e34fb6eec8e28d9e9fb935f8590273b8836cbadac313a15f05b4fd9f9d3024c8ce2c80d02
14cd7bf793 [test] call CheckPackage for package sanitization checks (glozow)
6876378365 MOVEONLY: move package unit tests to their own file (glozow)
c9b1439ca9 MOVEONLY: mempool checks to their own functions (glozow)
9e910d8152 scripted-diff: clean up MemPoolAccept aliases (glozow)
fd92b0c398 document workspace members (glozow)
3d3e4598b6 [validation] cache iterators to mempool conflicts (glozow)
36a8441912 [validation/rpc] cache + use vsize calculated in PreChecks (glozow)
8fa2936b34 [validation] re-introduce bool for whether a transaction is RBF (glozow)
cbb3598b5c [validation/refactor] store precomputed txdata in workspace (glozow)
0a79eaba72 [validation] case-based constructors for ATMPArgs (glozow)
Pull request description:
This contains the refactors and moves within #22674. There are no behavior changes, so it should be simpler to review.
ACKs for top commit:
ariard:
Code Review ACK 14cd7bf
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 14cd7bf793
laanwj:
Code review ACK 14cd7bf793, thanks for adding documentation and clarifying the code
t-bast:
Code Review ACK 14cd7bf793
Tree-SHA512: 580ed48b43713a3f9d81cd9b573ef6ac44efe5df2fc7b7b7036c232b52952b04bf5ea92940cf73739f4fbd54ecf980cef58032e8a2efe05229ad0b3c639de8a0
This addresses issues like the one in #12467, where some of our compiler flags
end up being dropped during the subconfigure of Univalue. Specifically, we're
still using the compiler-default c++ version rather than forcing c++17.
We can drop the need subconfigure completely in favor of a tighter build
integration, where the sources are listed separately from the build recipes,
so that they may be included directly by upstream projects. This is
similar to the way leveldb build integration works in Core.
Core benefits of this approach include:
- Better caching (for ex. ccache and autoconf)
- No need for a slow subconfigure
- Faster autoconf
- No more missing compile flags
- Compile only the objects needed
There are no benefits to Univalue itself that I can think of. These changes
should be a no-op there, and to downstreams as well until they take advantage
of the new sources.mk.
This also removes the option to use an external univalue to avoid similar ABI
issues with mystery binaries.
Co-authored-by: fanquake <fanquake@gmail.com>
e4c8bb62e4 build: Fix undefined reference to __mulodi4 (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
When compiling with clang on 32-bit systems the `__mulodi4` symbol is defined in compiler-rt only.
Fixes#21294.
See more:
- https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16404
- https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28629
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
tested-only ACK e4c8bb62e4
luke-jr:
utACK e4c8bb62e4
fanquake:
ACK e4c8bb62e4 - it's a bit of an awkward workaround to carry, but at-least it's contained to the fuzzers.
Tree-SHA512: 93edb4ed568027702b1b9aba953ad50889b834ef97fde3cb99d1ce70076d9c00aa13f95c86b12d6f59b24fa90108d93742f920e15119901a2848fb337ab859a1
fe6dc76b7c wallet test: Add test for subtract fee from recipient behavior (Russell Yanofsky)
2565478c81 wallet test refactor: add CreateSyncedWallet function (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This adds test coverage for wallet subtract from recipient behavior without changing it. Behavior seems to have changed recently in a minor way in #17331 without being noticed.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fe6dc76b7c
glozow:
ACK fe6dc76b7c
promag:
Code review ACK fe6dc76b7c.
Tree-SHA512: e00c5dfe467e4ccef5edb0dd4fff6c53f35a37828a4327bea2e166751e5ef971d519ffca7b8f735b12912bb4a547980626356bc1855981005aed1a6c2a57be0b
We encountered a linking error when attempting to include external_signer_scriptpubkeyman.cpp when configured with --disable-external-signer.
Everywhere else we have LIBBITCOIN_WALLET, it is always before LIBBITCOIN_COMMON. But if you go up to where FUZZ_SUITE_LD_COMMON is first set, you see that we will end up having LIBBITCOIN_COMMON set before LIBBITCOIN_WALLET which means that the linker will have problems linking things common things that the wallet uses. Because the order is correct for the other targets, we only see a linker error for test/fuzz/fuzz.
In this diff, LIBTEST_UTIL and LIBTEST_FUZZ are moved to the top because they include LIBBITCOIN_SERVER and LIBBITCOIN_COMMON. LIBBITCOIN_SERVER always needs to be the first item in the linker order since it has the most dependencies.
The makefiles for making the fuzz and test binaries should be revisited so that the linking order is made consistent with the rest of the code and to avoid other linker order issues that may crop up in the future.
Co-Authored-By: Andrew Chow <achow101-github@achow101.com>
Behavior might have recently changed in #17331 (it is not clear) but not
noticed because there is no test coverage.
This adds test coverage for current subtract from recipient behavior
without changing it.
Co-authored-by: Andrew Chow <achow101-github@achow101.com>
No change in behavior. This just moves some code from the ListCoins test
setup to a reusable util function, so it can be reused in a new test in
the next commit.
