so if there is an error in any of the pre-set coins, we can fail right away
without computing the wallet available coins set (calling `AvailableCoins`)
which is a slow operation as it goes through the entire wallet's txes map.
----------------------
And to make the Coin Selection flow cleared, have decoupled SelectCoins in two functions:
1) AutomaticCoinSelection.
2) SelectCoins.
1) AutomaticCoinSelection:
Receives a set of coins and selects the best subset of them to
cover the target amount.
2) SelectCoins
In charge of select all the user manually selected coins first ("pre-set inputs"), and
if coin_control 'm_allow_other_inputs=true', call 'AutomaticCoinSelection' to select a
subset of coins owned by the wallet to cover for the target - preset_inputs.total_amount
remaining value.
First step towards decoupling the pre-selected-inputs fetching functionality
from `SelectCoins`. Which, will let us not waste resources calculating the
available coins if one of the pre-set inputs has an error.
(right now, if one of the pre-set inputs is invalid, we first walk through
the entire wallet txes map just to end up failing right after it finish)
No need to walk through the entire wallet's txes map just to get
coins that we could have gotten by just doing a simple map.find(out.hash).
(Which is what we are doing inside `SelectCoins` anyway)
no need to waste resources calculating the wallet available coins if
they are not going to be used.
The 'm_allow_other_inputs=true` default value change is to correct
an ugly misleading behavior:
The tx creation process was having a workaround patch to automatically
fall back to select coins from the wallet if `m_allow_other_inputs=false`
(previous default value) and no manual inputs were selected.
This could be seen in master in flows like `sendtoaddress`, `sendmany`
and even the GUI, where the `m_allow_other_inputs` value isn't customized
and the wallet still selects and adds coins to the tx internally.
3e9d0bea8d build: only run high priority benchmarks in 'make check' (furszy)
466b54bd4a bench: surround main() execution with try/catch (furszy)
3da7cd2a76 bench: explicitly make all current benchmarks "high" priority (furszy)
05b8c76232 bench: add "priority level" to the benchmark framework (furszy)
f1593780b8 bench: place benchmark implementation inside benchmark namespace (furszy)
Pull request description:
This is from today's meeting, a simple "priority level" for the benchmark framework.
Will allow us to run certain benchmarks while skip non-prioritized ones in `make check`.
By default, `bench_bitcoin` will run all the benchmarks. `make check`will only run the high priority ones,
and have marked all the existent benchmarks as "high priority" to retain the current behavior.
Could test it by modifying any benchmark priority to something different from "high", and
run `bench_bitcoin -priority-level=high` and/or `bench_bitcoin -priority-level=medium,low`
(the first command will skip the modified bench while the second one will include it).
Note: the second commit could be avoided by having a default arg value for the priority
level but.. an explicit set in every `BENCHMARK` macro call makes it less error-prone.
ACKs for top commit:
kouloumos:
re-ACK 3e9d0bea8d
achow101:
ACK 3e9d0bea8d
theStack:
re-ACK 3e9d0bea8d
stickies-v:
re-ACK 3e9d0bea8d
Tree-SHA512: ece59bf424c5fc1db335f84caa507476fb8ad8c6151880f1f8289562e17023aae5b5e7de03e8cbba6337bf09215f9be331e9ef51c791c43bce43f7446813b054
e133264c5b Add test for PSBT input verification (Greg Sanders)
d25699280a Verify PSBT inputs rather than check for fields being empty (Greg Sanders)
Pull request description:
In a few keys spots, PSBT finality is checked by looking for non-empty witness data.
This complicates a couple things:
1) Empty data can be valid in certain cases
2) User may be passed bogus final data by a counterparty during PSBT work happening, and end up with incorrect signatures that they may not be able to check in other contexts if the UTXO doesn't exist yet in chain/mempool, timelocks, etc.
On the whole I think these heavier checks are worth it in case someone is actually assuming the signatures are correct if our API is saying so.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK e133264c5b
Tree-SHA512: 9de4fbb0be1257b081781f5df908fd55666e3acd5c4e36beb3b3f2f5a6aed69ff77068c44cde6127e159e773293fd9ced4c0bb47e693969f337e74dc8af030da
5d3f98d278 refactor: Replace m_params with chainman.GetParams() (Aurèle Oulès)
Pull request description:
Fixes a TODO introduced in #24595.
Removes `m_params` from `CChainState` class and replaces it with `m_chainman.GetParams()`.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 5d3f98d278🌎
Tree-SHA512: de0fe31450d281cc7307c0d820495e86c93c7998e77a148db2c703da66cff1059e6560c041f1864913c42075aa24d259c2623d45e929ca0a8056ed330a9f9978
1c48dae76f test: Use C++11 member initializers for TestMemPoolEntryHelper (MacroFake)
fad7f2239c test: Remove unused txmempool include from tests (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
Seems odd to include this heavy header in all tests despite it only being used in a few tests.
Can be reviewed with `--color-moved=dimmed-zebra --ignore-all-space`
ACKs for top commit:
aureleoules:
reACK 1c48dae76f
hebasto:
ACK 1c48dae76f, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
w0xlt:
ACK 1c48dae76f
Tree-SHA512: 31f2808d04ec33bfc2409832b8e59e6c870eaa98fbcf879e1c786492c7d07134711b30f8290bdb34e1b8f7b8f2f11dae8e10c64e7eb31f584b2f5c58fcc7743b
b147322a7a Use `PACKAGE_NAME` in messages rather than hardcoding "Bitcoin Core" (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Usually, we do not hardcode "Bitcoin Core" in the user-faced messages.
See:
- bitcoin/bitcoin#18646
- bitcoin/bitcoin#19282
Also grammar has been improved -- singular instead of plural.
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
ACK b147322a7a
Tree-SHA512: b135c18703dfdd7b63d4cb27d1ac48f6a9dbf69382142ae381f33bf561cbf57477a11d1c73263aa834f705206d7dd5716df2523d38ed0d4cfec8babc38bb017a
4aff7a48a4 test: check importing wallets when blocks are pruned throw an error (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for the following error:
437b608df2/src/wallet/rpc/backup.cpp (L513-L518)
ACKs for top commit:
andrewtoth:
ACK 4aff7a48a4
Tree-SHA512: fbbf6056cb3759f726b8a5ff25fca51bf47e973e5d655ec164e2bec88e2dbd3b243677869d2cf33af268ea635ca0f2e9f737c4734077fc5a936ac3a24ad4b88b
af781bf4b2 doc: fix typo in doc/libraries.md (fanquake)
9e9ae6101f doc: remove library commentary from src/Makefile.am (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Deduplicate the makefile comments, in favour of doc/libraries.md. I think a single, more comprehensive source of truth is preferable. Diagrams are also useful. Came up in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26292#issuecomment-1275094478.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK af781bf4b2, nice cleanups
hebasto:
ACK af781bf4b2, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: df61ed1394102221701ae2dfa42886dfabe9d9fd7f601b794e2195f93d8f7c2a1cd1c000a77d0a969b42328e8ebc0387755c57291837b283fdf376dbd98fdda1
e56d1d2afd test: Add functional tests for sendtxrcncl message from outbound (Gleb Naumenko)
cfcef60779 test: Add functional tests for sendtxrcncl from inbound (Gleb Naumenko)
b99ee9d22d test: Add unit tests for reconciliation negotiation (Gleb Naumenko)
f63f1d3f4b p2p: clear txreconciliation state for non-wtxid peers (Gleb Naumenko)
88d326c8e3 p2p: Finish negotiating reconciliation support (Gleb Naumenko)
36cf6bf216 Add helper to see if a peer is registered for reconciliations (Gleb Naumenko)
4470acf076 p2p: Forget peer's reconciliation state on disconnect (Gleb Naumenko)
3fcf78ee6a p2p: Announce reconciliation support (Gleb Naumenko)
24e36fac0a log: Add tx reconciliation log category (Gleb Naumenko)
Pull request description:
This is a part of the Erlay project:
- [parent PR](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21515)
- [associated BIP-330](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1376).
-------
This PR adds a new p2p message `sendtxrcncl` signaling for reconciliation support.
Before sending that message, a node is supposed to "pre-register" the peer by generating and storing an associated reconciliation salt component.
Once the salts are exchanged within this new message, nodes "register" each other for future reconciliations by computing and storing the aggregate salt, along with the reconciliation parameters based on the connection direction.
ACKs for top commit:
dergoegge:
re-ACK e56d1d2afd
sipa:
re-ACK e56d1d2afd. No differences with a rebase of previously reviewed e91690e67dad180c7fb9bed0409a9c4567d3e5df.
mzumsande:
re-ACK e56d1d2afd
vasild:
ACK e56d1d2afd
Tree-SHA512: 0db953b7347364e2496ebca3bfe6a27ac336307eec698242523a18336fcfc7a1ab87e3b09ce8b2bdf800ebbb1c9d33736ffdb8f5672f93735318789aa4a45f39
d216d714aa Revert "build: Use Homebrew's sqlite package if it is available" (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This reverts ee7b84e63c from #20527.
That change was made without any rationale, maybe other than, a brew
installed version might be newer, and that's "better". However when
building from source on macOS, it just results in drastically worse
performance, and issues / confusion like #25724.
The difference in performance can be observed using the example from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25724#issuecomment-1213554922,
but minified i.e:
```bash
time src/bitcoin-cli createwallet speedy true
time src/bitcoin-cli importdescriptors '[
{"desc":"raw(00145846369f3d6ba366d6f5a903fb5cf4dca3763c0e)#k9wh6v62","timestamp":"now"},
{"desc":"raw(001420800aabf13f3a4c4ce3ce4c66cecf1d17f21a6e)#6m0hlfh4","timestamp":"now"},
{"desc":"raw(0014c6bf9715e06d73ebf9b3b02d5cc48d24d8bbabc1)#wyavh36r","timestamp":"now"},
{"desc":"raw(00141ba7807b3f46af113beaea5c698428ce7138cd8a)#jctdsups","timestamp":"now"},
{"desc":"raw(00140c1bd27f10fff01b36ddf3c1febaa1acff19b080)#9s6nc3pk","timestamp":"now"},
{"desc":"raw(00141226e31987e4bc2e63c0ee12908f675e40464b20)#9pp7qm39","timestamp":"now"},
{"desc":"raw(0014f73f149f7503960a5e849c6ee7a8a8c336f631cb)#qtkxv9fc","timestamp":"now"},
{"desc":"raw(0014c8ccb4d81ffc769fc5fdd8d7eed69b0e0cae5749)#hn39qayv","timestamp":"now"},
{"desc":"raw(001498565aead2d67a22a6021d55210f2a917fc22169)#6ar3vwsx","timestamp":"now"},
{"desc":"raw(001403013248ac0cd9eabe176cad162cda2a19f771e1)#4m47mukd","timestamp":"now"}
]'
```
Running master, when building from souce and using brew installed
sqlite, this takes ~3.4s. With this PR, the same operation takes ~0.3s.
Resolves the "build from source" portion of #25724. Building from
depends is still not ideal, however I have some other changes that might
help improve things in that case.
Related performance issue reports:
* https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/issues/749
* https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/113898/bitcoin-v23-is-10-times-slower-than-v22-on-macos-for-basic-regtest-tests
* https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25724
* https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25985#issuecomment-1245942400
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK d216d714aa
jarolrod:
ACK d216d714aa
hebasto:
ACK d216d714aa, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged. No conflicts with our build [docs](d216d714aa/doc/build-osx.md (descriptor-wallet-support)).
Tree-SHA512: 1bb4b44385b11fa9fe66edd7449278f9e47a6cc679b7111f9adf17db94c34e29c9cceafc917454e134420db40b24b56da29226af6f43e6dbeff822b79b77ed60
We optimistically pre-register a peer for txreconciliations
upon sending txreconciliation support announcement.
But if, at VERACK, we realize that the peer never sent
WTXIDRELAY message, we should unregister the peer
from txreconciliations, because txreconciliations rely on wtxids.
Once we received a reconciliation announcement support
message from a peer and it doesn't violate our protocol,
we store the negotiated parameters which will be used
for future reconciliations.
If we're connecting to the peer which might support
transaction reconciliation, we announce we want to reconcile
with them.
We store the reconciliation salt so that when the peer
responds with their salt, we are able to compute the
full reconciliation salt.
This behavior is enabled with a CLI flag.
5165ae1405 add 0xb10c builder key (0xb10c)
Pull request description:
I've been asked to add my key given my [activity as GUIX builder](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/guix.sigs/commits?author=0xB10C).
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 5165ae1405
1440000bytes:
ACK 5165ae1405
hebasto:
ACK 5165ae1405, the added fingerprint is the same as one in my local gpg output.
Tree-SHA512: 794b01c87dec5139cd9dd3a1ec7ca4dd21351b16b46a4ea64c3be0e569ff20a301cdfa45873663f446e0a59d6319950f77c32f776260cff63e176b81ed262be3
ae3626ea52 test: use MiniWallet for rpc_scanblocks.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This is a small follow-up for #23549 which introduced `scanblocks`. Since that RPC doesn't need the wallet, we can switch the functional test to use MiniWallet.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK ae3626ea52
Tree-SHA512: e0b0088103e059b29719299c58fd5173b1cff58cb73025a9a33ad493cd0ac50ba25a5f790e471c00a09b4dca80f3c011174ca4e0c8f34746c39831f5823dc8ba
cbb2da8fcf add lock annotation for FeeFilterRounder::round() (glozow)
Pull request description:
CI failure from #24407: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/runs/8876014446
Calling `WITH_LOCK()` on a non-recursive mutex requires not holding it beforehand.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK cbb2da8fcf
dergoegge:
ACK cbb2da8fcf
hebasto:
ACK cbb2da8fcf, tested on Ubuntu 22.04 with clang 14.0.
Tree-SHA512: d6782ee48442b9d64d58a54c1ec7c53822ab051bf9728b44d6a0e05f1953e90f16420d349379345845db203fbad4e1f5750d9070adcb7daa18f12359a29488ca
e899d4ca6f init: limit bip30 exceptions to coinbase txs (Chris Geihsler)
511eb7fdea Ignore problematic blocks in DisconnectBlock (Chris Geihsler)
Pull request description:
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22596
When using checklevel=4, block verification fails because of duplicate coinbase transactions involving blocks 91812 and 91722. There was already a check in place within `ConnectBlock` to ignore the problematic blocks, but `DisconnectBlock` did not contain a similar check to ignore these blocks when called from `VerifyDB`.
By ignoring these two blocks in `DisconnectBlock`, the block verification process succeeds at checklevel=4.
(Note to reviewers: this is my first contribution to Bitcoin Core, so any feedback is most welcome. Thanks in advance for reviewing!)
## Steps to reproduce:
Use the following bitcoin.conf file and start bitcoind. I only used block data through block ~100000 so that the verification process was much faster.
```
assumevalid=0
checkblocks=0
checklevel=4
```
Without this change, you will see the following error when the blocks are verified:
```
2022-04-14T02:56:44Z init message: Verifying blocks…
2022-04-14T02:56:44Z Verifying last 101881 blocks at level 4
2022-04-14T02:56:44Z [0%]...[10%]...[20%]...[30%]...[40%]...ERROR: VerifyDB(): *** coin database inconsistencies found (last 10160 blocks, 142571 good transactions before that)
2022-04-14T02:57:01Z : Corrupted block database detected.
Please restart with -reindex or -reindex-chainstate to recover.
: Corrupted block database detected.
Please restart with -reindex or -reindex-chainstate to recover.
```
With this change, you will see this instead:
```
2022-04-14T02:32:29Z init message: Verifying blocks…
2022-04-14T02:32:29Z Verifying last 101746 blocks at level 4
2022-04-14T02:32:29Z [0%]...[10%]...[20%]...[30%]...[40%]...[50%]...[60%]...[70%]...[80%]...[90%]...[DONE].
2022-04-14T02:32:48Z No coin database inconsistencies in last 101746 blocks (226126 transactions)
```
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK e899d4ca6f
achow101:
ACK e899d4ca6f
jamesob:
(Biased) ACK e899d4ca6f ([`jamesob/ackr/24851.2.seejee.init_ignore_bip_30_verif`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/24851.2.seejee.init_ignore_bip_30_verif))
Tree-SHA512: d2f6d25e9619aee32c1a73fe846b1b587698eaa5a4994fa6424f1038f45654f9fd52b74a69843cc84d90168d74827130ccf8e9201502f5d52281acdb20429291
a8250e30f1 doc: add release note about `/rest/deploymentinfo` (brunoerg)
5c96020024 doc: add `/deploymentinfo` in REST-interface (brunoerg)
3e44bee08e test: add coverage for `/rest/deploymentinfo` (brunoerg)
91497031cb rest: add `/deploymentinfo` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
#23508 added a new RPC named `getdeploymentinfo`, it moved the softfork section from `getblockchaininfo` into this new one. In the REST interface, we have an endpoint named`/rest/chaininfo.json` (which refers to `getblockchaininfo`), so, this PR adds a new REST endpoint named `/deploymentinfo` which refers to `getdeploymentinfo`.
You can use it by passing a block hash, e.g: '/rest/deploymentinfo/<BLOCKHASH>.json' or you can use it without passing a block hash to get the 'deploymentinfo' for the last block.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
re-ACK a8250e30f1 rebase-only since my last review at c65f82bb
achow101:
ACK a8250e30f1
stickies-v:
re-ACK a8250e30f1
Tree-SHA512: 0735183b6828d51a72ed0e2be5a09b314ac4693f548982c6e9adaa0ef07a55aa428d3b2d1b1de70b83169811a663a8624b686166e5797f624dcc00178b9796e6
8173f160e0 style: rename variables to match coding style (Vasil Dimov)
8b4ad203d0 fees: make FeeFilterRounder::feeset const (Vasil Dimov)
e7a5bf6be7 fees: make the class FeeFilterRounder thread-safe (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
Make the class `FeeFilterRounder` thread-safe so that its methods can be called concurrently by different threads on the same object. Currently it has just one method (`round()`).
The second commit is optional, but it improves readability, showing that the `feeset` member will never be changed, thus does not need protection from concurrent access.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
re-ACK 8173f160e0
laanwj:
Code review ACK 8173f160e0
promag:
Code review ACK 8173f160e0
Tree-SHA512: 94b809997c485c0d114fa702d0406b980be8eaaebcfefa56808ed670aa943959c2f16cfd0ef72b4752fe2a409a23af1b4b7f2f236e51212957759569e3bbbefd
bff05bd745 test: add functional test for -discover (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a functional test for `-discover`. It tests different scenarios where `localaddresses` should be empty or may contain the addresses. Obs: `localaddresses` is not always accurate, so it's not possible to ensure (100%) it will contain any addresses.
515200298b/src/init.cpp (L449)
Obs: See #24258 - It adds test coverage for this field but for nodes with proxy.
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
Code review ACK bff05bd745
achow101:
ACK bff05bd745
rajarshimaitra:
tACK bff05bd745
Tree-SHA512: 8782497c146bce1ba86fda6146f3847465d7069f2cb6b84f2afc8f3b43efa813442bffe7447e9ce02adee304100b60365409bf0e5d875dfb880038442feec2a6
bfb9b94ebe wallet: remove duplicate descriptor type check in GetNewDestination (furszy)
76b982a4a5 wallet: remove unused `nAccountingEntryNumber` field (furszy)
599ff5adfc wallet: avoid double TopUp() calls on descriptor wallets (furszy)
Pull request description:
Found it while was digging over a `getnewaddress` timeout on the functional test suite.
### Context:
We are calling `TopUp()` twice in the following flows for descriptor wallets:
A) `CWallet::GetNewDestination`:
1) Calls spk_man->TopUp()
2) Calls spk_man->GetNewDestination() --> which, after the basic script checks, calls TopUp() again.
B) `CWallet::GetReservedDestination`:
1) Calls spk_man->TopUp()
2) Calls spk_man->GetReservedDestination() --> which calls to GetNewDestination (which calls to TopUp again).
### Changes:
Move `TopUp()` responsibility from the wallet class to each scriptpubkeyman.
So each spkm can decide to call it or not after perform the basic checks
for the new destination request.
Aside from that, remove the unused `nAccountingEntryNumber` wallet field. And a duplicated descriptor type check in `GetNewDestination`
ACKs for top commit:
aureleoules:
re-ACK bfb9b94ebe.
achow101:
ACK bfb9b94ebe
theStack:
Code-review ACK bfb9b94ebe
Tree-SHA512: 3ab73f37729e50d6c6a4434f676855bc1fb404619d63c03e5b06ce61c292c09c59d64cb1aa3bd9277b06f26988956991d62c90f9d835884f41ed500b43a12058
a3789c700b Improve getpeerinfo pingtime, minping, and pingwait help docs (Jon Atack)
df660ddb1c Update getpeerinfo/-netinfo/TxRelay#m_relay_txs relaytxes docs (for v24 backport) (Jon Atack)
1f448542e7 Always return getpeerinfo "minfeefilter" field (for v24 backport) (Jon Atack)
9cd6682545 Make getpeerinfo field order consistent with its help (for v24 backport) (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Various updates and fixups, mostly targeting v24. Please refer to the commit messages for details.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK a3789c700b
brunoerg:
ACK a3789c700b
vasild:
ACK a3789c700b
Tree-SHA512: b8586a9b83c1b18786b5ac1fc1dba91573c13225fc2cfc8d078f4220967c95056354f6be13327f33b4fcf3e9d5310fa4e1bdc93102cbd6574f956698993a54bf
626b7c8493 fuzz: add scanblocks as safe for fuzzing (James O'Beirne)
94fe5453c7 test: rpc: add scanblocks functional test (Jonas Schnelli)
6ef2566b68 rpc: add scanblocks - scan for relevant blocks with descriptors (Jonas Schnelli)
a4258f6e81 rpc: move-only: consolidate blockchain scan args (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
Revives #20664. All feedback from the previous PR has either been responded to inline or incorporated here.
---
Major changes from Jonas' PR:
- consolidated arguments for scantxoutset/scanblocks
- substantial cleanup of the functional test
Here's the range-diff (`git range-diff master jonasschnelli/2020/12/filterblocks_rpc jamesob/2021-11-scanblocks`): https://gist.github.com/jamesob/aa4a975344209f0316444b8de2ec1d18
### Original PR description
> The `scanblocks` RPC call allows one to get relevant blockhashes from a set of descriptors by scanning all blockfilters in a given range.
>
> **Example:**
>
> `scanblocks start '["addr(<bitcoin_address>)"]' 661000` (returns relevant blockhashes for `<bitcoin_address>` from blockrange 661000->tip)
>
> ## Why is this useful?
> **Fast wallet rescans**: get the relevant blocks and only rescan those via `rescanblockchain getblockheader(<hash>)[height] getblockheader(<hash>)[height])`. A future PR may add an option to allow to provide an array of blockhashes to `rescanblockchain`.
>
> **prune wallet rescans**: (_needs additional changes_): together with a call to fetch blocks from the p2p network if they have been pruned, it would allow to rescan wallets back to the genesis block in pruned mode (relevant #15946).
>
> **SPV mode** (_needs additional changes_): it would be possible to build the blockfilterindex from the p2p network (rather then deriving them from the blocks) and thus allow some sort of hybrid-SPV mode with moderate bandwidth consumption (related #9483)
ACKs for top commit:
furszy:
diff re-ACK 626b7c8
Tree-SHA512: f84e4dcb851b122b39e9700c58fbc31e899cdcf9b587df9505eaf1f45578cc4253e89ce2a45d1ff21bd213e31ddeedbbcad2c80810f46755b30acc17b07e2873
bf95976061 doc: add note about snapshot chainstate init (James O'Beirne)
e4d7995286 test: add testcases for snapshot initialization (James O'Beirne)
cced4e7336 test: move-only-ish: factor out LoadVerifyActivateChainstate() (James O'Beirne)
51fc9241c0 test: allow on-disk coins and block tree dbs in tests (James O'Beirne)
3c361391b8 test: add reset_chainstate parameter for snapshot unittests (James O'Beirne)
00b357c215 validation: add ResetChainstates() (James O'Beirne)
3a29dfbfb2 move-only: test: make snapshot chainstate setup reusable (James O'Beirne)
8153bd9247 blockmanager: avoid undefined behavior during FlushBlockFile (James O'Beirne)
ad67ff377c validation: remove snapshot datadirs upon validation failure (James O'Beirne)
34d1590331 add utilities for deleting on-disk leveldb data (James O'Beirne)
252abd1e8b init: add utxo snapshot detection (James O'Beirne)
f9f1735f13 validation: rename snapshot chainstate dir (James O'Beirne)
d14bebf100 db: add StoragePath to CDBWrapper/CCoinsViewDB (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the [assumeutxo project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11) (parent PR: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15606)
---
Half of the replacement for #24232. The original PR grew larger than expected throughout the review process.
This change adds the ability to initialize a snapshot-based chainstate during init if one is detected on disk. This is of course unused as of now (aside from in unittests) given that we haven't yet enabled actually loading snapshots.
Don't be scared! There are some big move-only commits in here.
Accompanying changes include:
- moving the snapshot coinsdb directory from being called `chainstate_[base blockhash]` to `chainstate_snapshot`, since we only support one snapshot in use at a time. This simplifies some logic, but it necessitates writing that base blockhash out to a file within the coinsdb dir. See [discussion here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24232#discussion_r832762880).
- adding a simple fix in `FlushBlockFile()` that avoids a crash when attemping to flush to disk before `LoadBlockIndexDB()` is called, which happens when calling `MaybeRebalanceCaches()` during multiple chainstate init.
- improving the unittest to allow testing with on-disk chainstates - necessary to test a simulated restart and re-initialization.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
utACK bf95976061
ariard:
Code Review ACK bf9597606
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK bf95976061. Changes since last review: rebasing, switching from CAutoFile to AutoFile, adding comments, switching from BOOST_CHECK to Assert in test util, using chainman.GetMutex() in tests, destroying one ChainstateManager before creating a new one in tests
fjahr:
utACK bf95976061
aureleoules:
ACK bf95976061
Tree-SHA512: 15ae75caf19f8d12a12d2647c52897904d27b265a7af6b4ae7b858592eeadb8f9da6c2394b6baebec90adc28742c053e3eb506119577dae7c1e722ebb3b7bcc0
