4da243ba02 qt: show own outputs on PSBT signing window (Hernan Marino)
Pull request description:
This fixes https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/issues/732 .
It allows you to identify your own addresses in the outputs of a transaction in the PSBT signing window. This enables easy identification of change outputs, and prevents certain attacks where someone (co-signers of a multisig, or others ) might trick you into signing a transaction while they are stealing the change, since prior to this modification there was no easy way of knowing this.
The identification of the output is similar to the way this is done in the transaction details window.
A sample output is :
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 4da243ba02
jarolrod:
ACK 4da243ba02
Tree-SHA512: fa9901d2acc84472c11afcd0a59a859db598cdf5cea755b492178d3e7434b70d9bd8f554928938a2ff9920c8f397fef814ce14b416556c30fba0c3c1f62cd722
31eca93a9e kernel: Remove StartShutdown calls from validation code (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
This change drops the last kernel dependency on shutdown.cpp. It also adds new hooks for libbitcoinkernel applications to be able to interrupt kernel operations when the chain tip changes.
This change is mostly a refactoring, but does slightly change `-stopatheight` behavior (see release note and commit message)
ACKs for top commit:
TheCharlatan:
ACK 31eca93a9e
furszy:
Concept and light review ACK 31eca93a
hebasto:
ACK 31eca93a9e, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK.
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 31eca93a9e 🕷
Tree-SHA512: e26928436bcde658e842b1f92e9c24b1ce91031fb63b41aafccf3130bfff532b75338a269a2bb7558bff2973913f17b97a00fec3e7e0588e2ce44de097142047
fa4ccf1511 ci: Add missing -O2 to valgrind tasks (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Currently the tasks have nothing (`-O0`) set, which makes them slow.
Fix this by falling back to the default (`-O2`).
ACKs for top commit:
recursive-rat4:
utACK fa4ccf1511
dergoegge:
utACK fa4ccf1511
Tree-SHA512: 44d803000d883cfa534f2c76d793d7d7f840e114fc377d20fc36d008b471d69ec9f0170358ed1f3567d49e3ff63682244062c954cd0b963df31ca39c08d2d5b9
35a2175ad8 fuzz: addrman, add coverage for `network` field in `Select()`, `Size()` and `GetAddr()` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds fuzz coverage for `network` field in `Select()`, `Size()` and `GetAddr()`, there was only call to them without passing a network.
https://marcofalke.github.io/b-c-cov/fuzz.coverage/src/addrman.cpp.gcov.html
ACKs for top commit:
amitiuttarwar:
for the record, ACK 35a2175ad8 - only small changes from the version (previously) proposed in 27213
achow101:
ACK 35a2175ad8
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK 35a2175ad8, haven't tested this yet, but I will let the fuzzer run for a while now.
Tree-SHA512: dddb8322298d6c373c8e68d57538470b11825a9a310a355828c351d5c0b19ff6779d024a800e3ea90126d0c050e86f71fd22cd23d1a306c784cef0f82c45e3ca
e7cf8657e1 test: add unit test for local address advertising (Martin Zumsande)
f4754b9dfb net: restrict self-advertisements with privacy networks (Martin Zumsande)
e4d541c7cf net, refactor: pass reference for peer address in GetReachabilityFrom (Martin Zumsande)
62d73f5370 net, refactor: pass CNode instead of CNetAddr to GetLocalAddress (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
The current logic for self-advertisements works such that we detect as many local addresses as we can, and then, using the scoring matrix from `CNetAddr::GetReachabilityFrom()`, self-advertise with the address that fits best to our peer.
It is in general not hard for our peers to distinguish our self-advertisements from other addrs we send them, because we self-advertise every ~24h and because the first addr we send over a connection is likely our self-advertisement.
`GetReachabilityFrom()` currently only takes into account actual reachability, but not whether we'd _want_ to announce our identity for one network to peers from other networks, which is not straightforward in connection with privacy networks.
While the general approach is to prefer self-advertising with the address for the network our peer is on, there are several special situations in which we don't have one, and as a result could allow self-advertise other local addresses, for example:
A) We run i2p and clearnet, use `-i2pacceptincoming=0` (so we have no local i2p address), and we have a local ipv4 address. In this case, we'd advertise the ipv4 address to our outbound i2p peers.
B) Our `-discover` logic cannot detect any local clearnet addresses in our network environment, but we are actually reachable over clearnet. If we ran bitcoind clearnet-only, we'd always advertise the address our peer sees us with instead, and could get inbound peers this way. Now, if we also have an onion service running (but aren't using tor as a proxy for clearnet connections), we could advertise our onion address to clearnet peers, so that they would be able to connect our clearnet and onion identities.
This PR tries to avoid these situations by
1.) never advertising our local Tor or I2P address to peers from other networks.
2.) never advertising local addresses from non-anonymity networks to peers from Tor or I2P
Note that this affects only our own self-advertisements, the rules to forward other people's addrs are not changed.
[Edit] after Initial [discussion](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27411#issuecomment-1497176155): CJDNS is not being treated like Tor and I2P at least for now, because it has different privacy properties and for the practical reason that it has still very few bitcoin nodes.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK e7cf8657e1
vasild:
ACK e7cf8657e1
luke-jr:
utACK e7cf8657e1
Tree-SHA512: 3db8415dea6f82223d11a23bd6cbb3b8cf68831321280e926034a1f110cbe22562570013925f6fa20d8f08e41d0202fd69c733d9f16217318a660d2a1a21b795
0bf87476f5 test: add ChaCha20 test triggering 32-bit block counter overflow (Sebastian Falbesoner)
7f2a985147 tests: improve ChaCha20 unit tests (Pieter Wuille)
511a8d406e crypto: Implement RFC8439-compatible variant of ChaCha20 (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Based on and replaces part of #25361, part of the BIP324 project (#27634). See also #19225 for background.
There are two variants of ChaCha20 in use. The currently implemented one uses a 64-bit nonce and a 64-bit block counter, while the one used in RFC8439 (and thus BIP324) uses a 96-bit nonce and 32-bit block counter. This PR changes the logic to use the 96-bit nonce variant, though in a way that's compatible with >256 GiB output (by automatically incrementing the first 32-bit part of the nonce when the block counter overflows).
For those who reviewed the original PR, the biggest change is here that the 96-bit nonce is passed as a Nonce96 type (pair of 32-bit + 64-bit integer) rather than a 12-byte array.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 0bf87476f5
theStack:
Code-review ACK 0bf87476f5
Tree-SHA512: 62e4cbd5388b8d50ef1a0dc99b6f4ad36c7b4419032035f8e622dda63a62311dd923032217e20054bcd836865d4be5c074f9e5538ca158f94f08eab75c5519c1
5cf44275c8 test: refactor: deduplicate legacy ECDSA signing for tx inputs (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
There are several instances in functional tests and the framework (MiniWallet, feature_block.py, p2p_segwit.py) where we create a legacy ECDSA signature for a certain transaction's input by doing the following steps:
1. calculate the `LegacySignatureHash` with the desired sighash type
2. create the actual digital signature by calling `ECKey.sign_ecdsa` on the signature message hash calculated above
3. put the DER-encoded result as CScript data push into tx input's scriptSig
Create a new helper `sign_input_legacy` which hides those details and takes only the necessary parameters (tx, input index, relevant scriptPubKey, private key, sighash type [SIGHASH_ALL by default]). For further convenience, the signature is prepended to already existing data-pushes in scriptSig, in order to avoid rehashing the transaction after calling the new signing function.
ACKs for top commit:
dimitaracev:
ACK `5cf4427`
achow101:
ACK 5cf44275c8
pinheadmz:
ACK 5cf44275c8
Tree-SHA512: 8f0e4fb2c3e0f84fac5dbc4dda87973276242b0f628034272a7f3e45434c1e17dd1b26a37edfb302dcaf380dbfe98b0417391ace5e0ac9720155d8fba702031e
This change drops the last kernel dependency on shutdown.cpp. It also adds new
hooks for libbitcoinkernel applications to be able to interrupt kernel
operations when the chain tip changes.
This is a refactoring that does not affect behavior. (Looking at the code it
can appear like the new break statement in the ActivateBestChain function is a
change in behavior, but actually the previous StartShutdown call was indirectly
triggering a break before, because it was causing m_chainman.m_interrupt to be
true. The new code just makes the break more obvious.)
89ba8905f5 test: indexes, fix on error infinite loop (furszy)
Pull request description:
Coming from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28036#issuecomment-1623813703, I thought that we were going to fix it there but seems that got merged without it for some reason.
As index sync failures trigger a shutdown request without notifying `BaseIndex::BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain` in any way, we also need to check whether a shutdown was requested or not inside 'IndexWaitSynced'.
Otherwise, any error inside the index sync process will hang the test forever.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 89ba8905f5
jamesob:
ACK 89ba890
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 89ba8905f5. Just comment update since last review
Tree-SHA512: 1f6daf34e51d3fbc802799bfa4ac0ef0d8f774db5f9e2f5d35df18a77679778475c94efc3da1fb723ebaf3583e4075e4a5cbe4a5104ad0c50e2b32076e247b29
462390c85f refactor: Move stopafterblockimport handling out of blockstorage (TheCharlatan)
Pull request description:
This has the benefit of moving this StartShutdown call out of the blockstorage file and thus out of the kernel's responsibility. The user can now decide if he wants to start shutdown / interrupt after a block import or not.
This also simplifies https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28048, making it one fewer shutdown call to handle.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 462390c85f 🗝
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 462390c85f. Just has been rebased and is a simpler change after #27607
Tree-SHA512: 84e58256b1c61f10e7ec5ecf32916f40a2ab1ea7cce703de0fa1c61ee2be94bd45ed32718bc99903b6eff3e6d3d5b506470bf567ddbb444a58232913918e8ab8
This has the benefit of moving the StartShutdown call out of the
blockstorage file and thus out of the kernel's responsibility. The user
can now decide if he wants to start shutdown / interrupt after a block
import or not.
faf902858d test: Check expected_stderr after stop (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This fixes a bug where stderr wasn't checked for the shutdown sequence.
Fix that by waiting for the shutdown to finish and then check stderr.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
ACK faf902858d
Tree-SHA512: a70cd1e6cda84d542782e41e8b59741dbcd472c0d0575bcef5cbfd1418473ce94efe921481d557bae3fbbdd78f1c49c09c48872883c052d87c5c9a9a51492692
As index sync failures trigger a shutdown request without notifying
BaseIndex::BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain in any way, we also need
to check whether a shutdown was requested or not inside 'IndexWaitSynced'.
Otherwise, any error inside the index sync process will hang the test
forever.
ca91c244ef index: verify blocks data existence only once (furszy)
fcbdaeef4d init: don't start indexes sync thread prematurely (furszy)
2ec89f1970 refactor: simplify pruning violation check (furszy)
c82ef91eae make GetFirstStoredBlock assert that 'start_block' always has data (furszy)
430e7027a1 refactor: index, decouple 'Init' from 'Start' (furszy)
225e213110 refactor: init indexes, decouple 'Start()' from the creation step (furszy)
2ebc7e68cc doc: describe 'init load' thread actions (Martin Zumsande)
04575106b2 scripted-diff: rename 'loadblk' thread name to 'initload' (furszy)
ed4462cc78 init: start indexes sync earlier (furszy)
Pull request description:
Simplifies index startup code, eliminating the `g_indexes_ready_to_sync` variable,
deduplicating code and moving the prune violation check out of the `BaseIndex` class.
Also makes startup more efficient by running the prune violation check once for all indexes
instead of once for each index, and by delaying the prune violation check and moving it off
of the main thread so the node can start up faster and perform the block data availability
verification even when the '-reindex" or the "-reindex-chainstate" flags are enabled (which
hasn't being possible so far).
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK ca91c244ef. Just rebase and suggested changes since last review (Start return check, and code simplification)
TheCharlatan:
re-ACK ca91c244ef
Tree-SHA512: e9c98ce89aeb29e8d0f505f17b34aa54fe44efefbf017f4746e3b446ab4de25ade4f707254a0bbe4b99b69731b04a4067ce529eb7aa834ced196784b694cf7ce
3e8bf2e10c test: make assumeUTXO test capture the expected fatal error (furszy)
Pull request description:
The test is exercising the error, so it can capture it before the
test framework displays it on the console as an unforeseen
fatal error.
It is odd to observe a fatal error after executing the complete
test suite and seeing it pass successfully.
Reproduction Steps:
Run the unit test suite. A long AssumeUTXO fatal error will be
printed even when all tests pass successfully.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 3e8bf2e10c
theStack:
Tested ACK 3e8bf2e10c
TheCharlatan:
ACK 3e8bf2e10c
Tree-SHA512: 820a5a4db52085ed72cbe7eb433b8c0f2d283ac6f5d456bc2b3e3f0305301022b2729e32e5fd9002859e4491ae7ac6de568a4c20557c7b249b0e7694ab8bd177
At present, during init, we traverse the chain (once per index)
to confirm that all necessary blocks to sync each index up to
the current tip are present.
To make the process more efficient, we can fetch the oldest block
from the indexers and perform the chain data existence check from
that point only once.
This also moves the pruning violation check to the end of the
'loadinit' thread, which is where the reindex, block loading and
chain activation processes happen.
Making the node's startup process faster, allowing us to remove
the global g_indexes_ready_to_sync flag, and enabling the
execution of the pruning violation verification even when the
reindex or reindex-chainstate flags are enabled (which has being
skipped so far).
By moving the 'StartIndexes()' call into the 'initload'
thread, we can remove the threads active wait. Optimizing
the available resources.
The only difference with the current state is that now the
indexes threads will only be started when they can process
work and not before it.
By generalizing 'GetFirstStoredBlock' and implementing
'CheckBlockDataAvailability' we can dedup code and
avoid repeating work when multiple indexes are enabled.
E.g. get the oldest block across all indexes and
perform the pruning violation check from that point
up to the tip only once (this feature is being introduced
in a follow-up commit).
This commit shouldn't change behavior in any way.
Co-authored-by: Ryan Ofsky <ryan@ofsky.org>
And transfer the responsibility of verifying whether 'start_block'
has data or not to the caller.
This is because the 'GetFirstStoredBlock' function responsibility
is to return the first block containing data. And the current
implementation can return 'start_block' when it has no data!. Which
is misleading at least.
Edge case behavior change:
Previously, if the block tip lacked data but all preceding blocks
contained data, there was no prune violation. And now, such
scenario will result in a prune violation.
Verify that our ChaCha20 implementation using the 96/32 split interface
is compatible with >256 GiB outputs by triggering a 32-bit block counter
overflow and checking that the keystream matches one created with an
alternative implementation using a 64/64 split interface with the
corresponding input data. The test case data was generated with the
following Python script using the PyCryptodome library (version 3.15.0):
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
from Crypto.Cipher import ChaCha20
key = bytes(list(range(32))); nonce = 0xdeadbeef12345678; pos = 2**32 - 1
c = ChaCha20.new(key=key, nonce=nonce.to_bytes(8, 'little'))
c.seek(pos * 64); stream = c.encrypt(bytes([0])*128)
print(f"Key: {key.hex()}\nNonce: {hex(nonce)}\nPos: {hex(pos)}\nStream: {stream.hex()}")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No behavior change.
The goal here is to group indexes, so we can perform the same
initialization and verification process equally for all of them.
The checks performed inside `StartIndexes` will be expanded
in the subsequent commits.
The thread does not only load blocks, it loads the mempool and,
in a future commit, will start the indexes as well.
Also, renamed the 'ThreadImport' function to 'ImportBlocks'
And the 'm_load_block' class member to 'm_thread_load'.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i "s/ThreadImport/ImportBlocks/g" $(git grep -l ThreadImport -- ':!/doc/')
sed -i "s/loadblk/initload/g" $(git grep -l loadblk -- ':!/doc/release-notes/')
sed -i "s/m_load_block/m_thread_load/g" $(git grep -l m_load_block)
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
The mempool load can take a while, and it is not
needed for the indexes' synchronization.
Also, having the mempool load function call
inside 'blockstorage.cpp' wasn't structurally
correct.
There are two variants of ChaCha20 in use. The original one uses a 64-bit
nonce and a 64-bit block counter, while the one used in RFC8439 uses a
96-bit nonce and 32-bit block counter. This commit changes the interface
to use the 96/32 split (but automatically incrementing the first 32-bit
part of the nonce when the 32-bit block counter overflows, so to retain
compatibility with >256 GiB output).
Simultaneously, also merge the SetIV and Seek64 functions, as we almost
always call both anyway.
Co-authored-by: dhruv <856960+dhruv@users.noreply.github.com>
8b5397c00e wallet: bdb: include bdb header from our implementation files only (Cory Fields)
6e010626af wallet: bdb: don't use bdb define in header (Cory Fields)
004b184b02 wallet: bdb: move BerkeleyDatabase constructor to cpp file (Cory Fields)
b3582baa3a wallet: bdb: move SafeDbt to cpp file (Cory Fields)
e5e5aa1da2 wallet: bdb: move SpanFromDbt to below SafeDbt's implementation (Cory Fields)
4216f69250 wallet: bdb: move TxnBegin to cpp file since it uses a bdb function (Cory Fields)
43369f3706 wallet: bdb: drop default parameter (Cory Fields)
Pull request description:
Only `#include` upstream bdb headers from our cpp files.
It's generally good practice to avoid including 3rd party deps in headers as otherwise they tend to sneak into new compilation units. IMO this makes for a nice cleanup.
There's a good bit of code movement here, but each commit is small and _should_ be obviously correct.
Note: in the future, the buildsystem can add the bdb include path for `bdb.cpp` and `salvage.cpp` only, rather than all wallet sources.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
reACK 8b5397c00e
hebasto:
ACK 8b5397c00e
Tree-SHA512: 0ef6e8a9c4c6e2d1e5d6a3534495f91900e4175143911a5848258c56da54535b85fad67b6d573da5f7b96e7881299b5a8ca2327e708f305b317b9a3e85038d66
7ecc29a0b7 test: wallet, add coverage for addressbook migration (furszy)
a277f8357a wallet: migration bugfix, persist empty labels (furszy)
1b64f6498c wallet: migration bugfix, clone 'send' record label to all wallets (furszy)
Pull request description:
Addressing two specific bugs encountered during the wallet migration process, related to the address book, and improves the test coverage for it.
Bug 1: Non-Cloning of External 'Send' Records
The external 'send' records were not being correctly cloned to all wallets.
Bug 2: Persistence of Empty Labels
As address book entries without associated db label records can be treated as change (the `label` field inside the `CAddressBookData` class is optional, `nullopt` labels make `CAddressBookData ::IsChange()` return true), we must persist empty labels during the migration process.
The user might have called `setlabel` with an "" string for an external address and that must be retained during migration.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 7ecc29a0b7
Tree-SHA512: b8a8483a4178a37c49af11eb7ba8a82ca95e54a6cd799e155e33f9fbe7f37b259e28372c77d6944d46b6765f9eaca6b8ca8d1cdd9d223120a3653e4e41d0b6b7
fa1e27fe8e fuzz: Generate rpc fuzz targets individually (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The `rpc` fuzz target was added more than two years ago in e45863166f. However, the bug https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27913 was only found recently. Thus, it is pretty clear that fuzz engines can't deal with a search space that is too broad and can be extended in too many directions.
Fix that by limiting the search space to each RPC method name and then iterate over all names, instead of letting the fuzz engine do the iteration.
With this, the bug can be found in seconds, as opposed to years of CPU time (or never).
ACKs for top commit:
brunoerg:
ACK fa1e27fe8e
dergoegge:
ACK fa1e27fe8e
Tree-SHA512: 45ccba842367650d010320603153276b1b303deda9ba8c6bb31a4d2473b00aa5bca866db95f541485d65efd8276e2575026968c037872ef344fa33cf45bcdcd7
fac6af16f4 Allow std::byte serialization (MarcoFalke)
fade43edc4 Allow FastRandomContext::randbytes for all byte types (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
I need this for some stuff, but it should also be useful by itself for other developers that need it.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK fac6af16f4
dergoegge:
Code review ACK fac6af16f4
Tree-SHA512: db4b1bbd6bf6ef6503d59b0b4ed1681db8d935d2d10f8d89f071978ea59b49a1d319bccb4e9717c0c88a4908bbeca4fd0cbff6c655d8a443554fd14146fe16de
fabed7eb79 test: Restore unlimited timeout in IndexWaitSynced (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The timeout was unlimited before, so just restore that value for now: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27988#issuecomment-1619218007 .
(Strictly speaking, this is a behavior change for the blockfilterindex and txindex tests, because it only restores the coinstatsindex behavior.)
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
utACK fabed7eb79
mzumsande:
ACK fabed7eb79
furszy:
ACK fabed7eb
Tree-SHA512: 66a878be58bbe53ad8e0c23f05569dd42df688be747551fbd202ada22d20a8285714e58fa2a71664deadb070ddf86cfad88c01042ff95ed26f6b40e4a10cec0a
bea9fc2600 wallet: sqlite: force sqlite3.h to be included by the cpp files (Cory Fields)
Pull request description:
Only `#include` upstream sqlite headers from our cpp files.
Like #28039 but simpler :)
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK bea9fc2600
TheCharlatan:
Nice, ACK bea9fc2600
kristapsk:
utACK bea9fc2600
hebasto:
ACK bea9fc2600, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK.
Tree-SHA512: cb83ac51eed7e0740f1c75ee87c7849fa7e535bc4836c499290041eb995ccfd82533e3babfe83a164257b62b180f206112d6a1bae7ea290ad0ec7f55d62432da
6eb33bd0c2 kernel: Add fatalError method to notifications (TheCharlatan)
7320db96f8 kernel: Add flushError method to notifications (TheCharlatan)
3fa9094b92 scripted-diff: Rename FatalError to FatalErrorf (TheCharlatan)
edb55e2777 kernel: Pass interrupt reference to chainman (TheCharlatan)
e2d680a32d util: Add SignalInterrupt class and use in shutdown.cpp (TheCharlatan)
Pull request description:
Get rid of all `ShutdownRequested` calls in validation code by introducing an interrupt object that applications can use to cancel long-running kernel operations.
Replace all `AbortNode` calls in validation code with new fatal error and flush error notifications so kernel applications can be notified about failures and choose how to handle them.
---
This pull request is part of the `libbitcoinkernel` project https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27587https://github.com/orgs/bitcoin/projects/3 and more specifically its "Step 2: Decouple most non-consensus code from libbitcoinkernel".
The pull request mostly allows dropping the kernel dependency on shutdown.cpp. The only dependency left after this is a `StartShutdown` call which will be removed in followup PR https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27711. This PR also drops the last reference to the `uiInterface` global in kernel code. The process of moving the `uiInterface` out of the kernel was started in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27636.
This pull request contains a subset of patches originally proposed in #27711. It will be part of a series of changes required to make handling of interrupts (or in other words the current shutdown procedure) in the kernel library more transparent and less reliable on global mutable state. The set of patches contained here was originally proposed by @ryanofsky [here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27711#issuecomment-1580779869).
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
light ACK 6eb33bd0c2
hebasto:
ACK 6eb33bd0c2, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 6eb33bd0c2. No changes since last review other than rebase.
Tree-SHA512: 7d2d05fa4805428a09466d43c11ae32946cbb25aa5e741b1eec9cd142e4de4bb311e13ebf1bb125ae490c9d08274f2d56c93314e10f3d69e7fec7445e504987c
fa956d2048 ci: Print full lscpu output (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Seems odd to withhold the other output, given that it may be useful to debug issues?
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fa956d2048
Tree-SHA512: d93a79734a594c2ee180107e3ed1d1c07c1b6324b4b1e239d3f263e72490ca641f60a4e80793229523e2d52059958a896cb210014e3aa747a19871be62f5a961
