9bac71350d build: make HAVE_O_CLOEXEC available outside LevelDB (bugfix) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
584fd91d2d init: only use pipe2 if availabile, check in configure (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
The result of the O_CLOEXEC availability check is currently only set in the Makefile and passed to LevelDB (see `LEVELDB_CPPFLAGS_INT` in `src/Makefile.leveldb.include`), but not defined to be used in our codebase. This means that code within the preprocessor conditional `#if HAVE_O_CLOEXEC` was actually never compiled. On the master branch this is currently used for pipe creation in `src/shutdown.cpp`, PR #21007 moves this part to a new module (I found the issue while testing that PR).
The fix is similar to the one in #19803, which solved the same problem for HAVE_FDATASYNC.
In the course of working on the PR it turned out that pipe2 is not available an all platforms, hence a configure check and a corresponding define HAVE_PIPE2 is introduced and used.
The PR can be tested by anyone with a system that has pipe2 and O_CLOEXEC available by putting gibberish into the HAVE_O_CLOEXEC block: on master, everything should compile fine, on PR, the compiler should abort with an error. At least that's my naive way of testing preprocessor logic, happy to hear more sophisticated ways :-)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 9bac71350d
Tree-SHA512: aec89faf6ba52b6f014c610ebef7b725d9e967207d58b42a4a71afc9f1268fcb673ecc85b33a2a3debba8105a304dd7edaba4208c5373fcef2ab83e48a170051
ba7e17e073 rpc, test: document {previous,next}blockhash as optional (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR updates the result help of the following RPCs w.r.t. the `previousblockhash` and `nextblockhash` fields:
- getblockheader
- getblock
Also adds trivial tests on genesis block (should not contain "previousblockhash") and best block (should not contain "nextblockhash").
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: ef42c5c773fc436e1b4a67be14e2532e800e1e30e45e54a57431c6abb714d2c069c70d40ea4012d549293b823a1973b3f569484b3273679683b28ed40abf46bb
f75e0c1edd doc: add external-signer.md (Sjors Provoost)
d4b0107d68 rpc: send: support external signer (Sjors Provoost)
245b4457cf rpc: signerdisplayaddress (Sjors Provoost)
7ebc7c0215 wallet: ExternalSigner: add GetDescriptors method (Sjors Provoost)
fc5da520f5 wallet: add GetExternalSigner() (Sjors Provoost)
259f52cc33 test: external_signer wallet flag is immutable (Sjors Provoost)
2655197e1c rpc: add external_signer option to createwallet (Sjors Provoost)
2700f09c41 rpc: signer: add enumeratesigners to list external signers (Sjors Provoost)
07b7c940a7 rpc: add external signer RPC files (Sjors Provoost)
8ce7767071 wallet: add ExternalSignerScriptPubKeyMan (Sjors Provoost)
157ea7c614 wallet: add external_signer flag (Sjors Provoost)
f3e6ce78fb test: add external signer test (Sjors Provoost)
8cf543f96d wallet: add -signer argument for external signer command (Sjors Provoost)
f7eb7ecc67 test: framework: add skip_if_no_external_signer (Sjors Provoost)
87a97941f6 configure: add --enable-external-signer (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Big picture overview in [this gist](https://gist.github.com/Sjors/29d06728c685e6182828c1ce9b74483d).
This PR lets `bitcoind` call an arbitrary command `-signer=<cmd>`, e.g. a hardware wallet driver, where it can fetch public keys, ask to display an address, and sign a transaction (using PSBT under the hood).
It's design to work with https://github.com/bitcoin-core/HWI, which supports multiple hardware wallets. Any command with the same arguments and return values will work. It simplifies the manual procedure described [here](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/HWI/blob/master/docs/bitcoin-core-usage.md).
Usage is documented in [doc/external-signer.md](
https://github.com/Sjors/bitcoin/blob/2019/08/hww-box2/doc/external-signer.md), which also describes what protocol a different signer binary should conform to.
Use `--enable-external-signer` to opt in, requires Boost::Process:
```
Options used to compile and link:
with wallet = yes
with gui / qt = no
external signer = yes
```
It adds the following RPC methods:
* `enumeratesigners`: asks <cmd> for a list of signers (e.g. devices) and their master key fingerprint
* `signerdisplayaddress <address>`: asks <cmd> to display an address
It enhances the following RPC methods:
* `createwallet`: takes an additional `external_signer` argument and fetches keys from device
* `send`: automatically sends transaction to device and waits
Usage TL&DR:
* clone HWI repo somewhere and launch `bitcoind -signer=../HWI/hwi.py`
* check if you can see your hardware device: `bitcoin-cli enumeratesigners`
* create wallet and auto import keys `bitcoin-cli createwallet "hww" true true "" true true true`
* display address on device: `bitcoin-cli signerdisplayaddress ...`
* to spend, use `send` RPC and approve transaction on device
Prerequisites:
- [x] #21127 load wallet flags before everything else
- [x] #21182 remove mostly pointless BOOST_PROCESS macro
Potentially useful followups:
- GUI support: bitcoin-core/gui#4
- bumpfee support
- (automatically) verify (a subset of) keys on the device after import, through message signing
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
re-ACK f75e0c1edd
Tree-SHA512: 7db8afd54762295c1424c3f01d8c587ec256a72f34bd5256e04b21832dabd5dc212be8ab975ae3b67de75259fd569a561491945750492f417111dc7b6641e77f
faf48f20f1 log: Clarify log message when file does not exist (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Shorter and broader alternative to #21181
Rendered diff:
```diff
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-Bitcoin Core version v21.99.0-db656db2ed5a (release build)
+Bitcoin Core version v21.99.0-faf48f20f196 (release build)
Qt 5.15.2 (dynamic), plugin=wayland (dynamic)
No static plugins.
Style: adwaita / Adwaita::Style
@@ -24,8 +24,8 @@ scheduler thread start
Using wallet directory /tmp/test_001/regtest/wallets
init message: Verifying wallet(s)...
init message: Loading banlist...
-ERROR: DeserializeFileDB: Failed to open file /tmp/test_001/regtest/banlist.dat
-Invalid or missing banlist.dat; recreating
+Missing or invalid file /tmp/test_001/regtest/banlist.dat
+Recreating banlist.dat
SetNetworkActive: true
Failed to read fee estimates from /tmp/test_001/regtest/fee_estimates.dat. Continue anyway.
Using /16 prefix for IP bucketing
@@ -63,9 +63,9 @@ Bound to [::]:18444
Bound to 0.0.0.0:18444
Bound to 127.0.0.1:18445
init message: Loading P2P addresses...
-ERROR: DeserializeFileDB: Failed to open file /tmp/test_001/regtest/peers.dat
-Invalid or missing peers.dat; recreating
-ERROR: DeserializeFileDB: Failed to open file /tmp/test_001/regtest/anchors.dat
+Missing or invalid file /tmp/test_001/regtest/peers.dat
+Recreating peers.dat
+Missing or invalid file /tmp/test_001/regtest/anchors.dat
0 block-relay-only anchors will be tried for connections.
init message: Starting network threads...
net thread start
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK faf48f20f1
amitiuttarwar:
utACK faf48f20f1, 👍 for consistency. also checked where we create / load other `.dat` files, looks good to me.
practicalswift:
cr ACK faf48f20f1
Tree-SHA512: 697a728ef2b9f203363ac00b03eaf23ddf80bee043ecd3719265a0d884e8cfe88cd39afe946c86ab849edd1c836f05ec51125f052bdc14fe184b84447567756f
5e531e6beb assumptions: check C++17 assumption with MSVC (fanquake)
c7b46489f8 assumptions: assume a C++17 compiler (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This has been the case since #20413.
This should also enable the check for MSVC. From my reading of https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/reference/zc-cplusplus?view=msvc-160 and https://devblogs.microsoft.com/cppblog/msvc-now-correctly-reports-__cplusplus/ if we set the `/Zc:__cplusplus` switch in additional options, MSVC will report the correct value for `__cplusplus`. However I have not tested this.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 5e531e6beb
hebasto:
ACK 5e531e6beb, checked the MS docs, and AppVeyor build is green.
practicalswift:
ACK 5e531e6beb
Tree-SHA512: a4fb525cf5c33abc944c614edb0313a39c8a39a1637a03c09342c15ba0925f4eb037062e65e51b42ade667506b7e554c7159acf86e6b8c35d0a87dd79a6f239b
5786a818e1 Verify that all validation flags are backward compatible (gzhao408)
b10ce9aa48 [test] check verification flags are minimal/maximal (gzhao408)
a260c22cad [test] Check for invalid flag combinations (gzhao408)
a7098a2a8d [refactor] use CheckTxScripts, TrimFlags, FillFlags (gzhao408)
7a77727b2f Apply minimal validation flags to tx_invalid tests (gzhao408)
9532591bed [test] add BADTX setting for invalid txns that fail CheckTransaction (gzhao408)
4c06ebf128 [test] fix two witness tests in invalid tests with empty vout (gzhao408)
158a0b268c Apply maximal validation flags to tx_valid tests (gzhao408)
0a76a39b63 [test] fix CSV test missing OP_ADD (gzhao408)
19db590d04 [test] remove unnecessary OP_1s from CSV and CLTV tests (gzhao408)
Pull request description:
This uses the first 4 commits of #15045, rebased and added some comments. The diff is quite large already and I want to make it easy to review, so I'm splitting it into 2 PRs (transaction and script). Script one is WIP, I'll link it when I open it.
Interpretation of scripts is dependent on the script verification flags passed in.
In tests, we should always apply **maximal** verification flags when checking that a transaction is **valid**; any additional flags should invalidate the transaction. A transaction should not be valid because we forgot to include a flag, and we should apply all flags by default.
We should apply **minimal** verification flags when asserting that a transaction is **invalid**; if verification flags are applied, removing any one of them should mean the transaction is valid.
New verify flags must be backwards compatible; tests should check backwards compatibility and apply the new flags by default. All `tx_invalid` tests should continue to be invalid with the exact same verify flags. All `tx_valid` tests that don't pass with new flags should _explicitly_ indicate that the flags need to be excluded, and fail otherwise.
1. Flip the meaning of `verifyFlags` in tx_valid.json to mean _excluded_ verification flags instead of included flags. Edit the test data accordingly.
2. Trim unneeded flags from tx_invalid.json.
3. Add check to verify that tx_valid tests have maximal flags and tx_invalid tests have minimal flags.
4. Add checks to verify that flags are soft forks (#10699) i.e. adding any flag should only decrease the number of acceptable scripts. Test by adding/removing random flags.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 5786a818e1
laanwj:
ACK 5786a818e1
Tree-SHA512: 19195d8cf3299e62f47dd3443ae4a95430c5c9d497993a18ab80de9e24b1869787af972774993bf05717784879bc4592fdabaae0fddebd437963d8f3c96d9a73
Currently, the only way to copy the address of a payment request is to double-click on the payment request and then click on the copy address button. This commit adds a convenient context menu action to copy the address of a payment request.
fa1f3a26a7 doc: Clarify that squashing should happen before review (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Unlike other repos, in our repo code review happens before merge, ideally.
Thus, rebases, solving merge conflicts and squashing should happen before review, which again happens before merge.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
ACK fa1f3a26a7
fanquake:
ACK fa1f3a26a7
Tree-SHA512: e9222191a6e9cf9867bd1f29982526dd7b746b70dd2cc94f485256ec98ff2d3941c9b40728935e151d13795239334e334b71ad41044909cb2849f57776811a94
a6a1b106dc guix: only download sources for hosts being built (fanquake)
Pull request description:
For example, if a user is only interested in building for Linux, this saves downloading the macOS compiler and additional dependencies, which is meaningful on a slow/poor connection. This will result in a few additional `make` invocations, for the Linux hosts, however this is low overhead, and time-wise irrelevant in terms of the overall build.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK a6a1b106dc
Tree-SHA512: 34c916ae6f69fed0d5845690b39111a8bee37208fd727176f375cf5eb4860f512abe12bde2680d697c859b4d50a3bc5688ddca7c2f28f9968fcf358753cf3f6d
95990b9f32 guix: Update conservative space requirements (Carl Dong)
5e6df11326 guix: Add support for powerpc64{,le} (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
```
The new time-machine commit contains a few small changes that make the
powerpc cross-toolchain work.
```
See this compare to review my custom patches to Guix: 7d6bd44da5...6c9d16db96
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 95990b9f32
Tree-SHA512: 464b0fb93d65962d8c27499293edb618d13d18f40d44e3eed96935e86d430666dfb1c5b8a30f99ffdfd17b44514ad88e358977390b689a2e3831d521f6f7b86a
ccb7b6a976 contrib: run test-symbol check for RISCV (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Now that we are using Focal for gitian building (glibc 2.31), we can use a newer introduced symbol, and include RISC-V in this test.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review re-ACK ccb7b6a976
Tree-SHA512: 4ddaafc0b6cced49a504847ed8da02b0a514eca69014fdc2ad01068c6f8ddf9ad992525f47b2a182c3b4a5845f8dacfe5a7e4acf2f303a5dab6a70daa3b89509
25c57d6409 [doc] Add a note about where lock annotations should go. (Amiti Uttarwar)
ad5f01b960 [validation] Move the lock annotation from function definition to declaration (Amiti Uttarwar)
Pull request description:
Based on reviewing #21188
the first commit switches the lock annotations on `CheckInputScripts` to be on the function declaration instead of on the function definition. this ensures that all call sites are checked, not just ones that come after the definition.
the second commit adds a note to the developer-notes section to clarify where the annotations should be applied.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 25c57d6409🥘
promag:
Code review ACK 25c57d6409.
Tree-SHA512: 61b6ef856bf6c6016d535fbdd19daf57b9e59fe54a1f30d47282a071b9b9d60b2466b044ee57929e0320cb1bdef52e7a1687cacaa27031bbc43d058ffffe22ba
fa55159b9e net: Log to net debug in MaybeDiscourageAndDisconnect except for noban and manual peers (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The goal is to avoid local peers (e.g. untrusted peers on the local network or inbound onion peers via a local onion proxy) filling the debug log (and thus the disk).
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fa55159b9e
vasild:
ACK fa55159b9e
Tree-SHA512: de233bf57334580f9b91f369fafd131d71c5ae25db25b09cc8fa8cbf34c0648f083c52260a6a912238751467e3c3c5f5d2309c145710753058d44a0003f88f4f
8f9644890a qt: Remove Transactionview Edit Label Action (Jarol Rodriguez)
Pull request description:
This PR removes the `Edit Label` action from the `transactionview` context menu. Since the `Edit Label` action will no longer be utilized in the `transactionview`, the `Edit Label` function logic is also removed.
| Master | PR |
| ----------- | ----------- |
|<img width="248" alt="Screen Shot 2021-02-17 at 8 34 34 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23396902/108292189-9b86c800-7161-11eb-9e80-6238523bc27e.png">|<img width="248" alt="Screen Shot 2021-02-17 at 8 35 10 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23396902/108292204-a17ca900-7161-11eb-8582-7f33d3e2ba8f.png">|
Among the context menu actions for each transaction in the `transactionview` is the `Edit Label` action.
While all other actions apply directly to the selected transaction, the `Edit Label` action applies to the selected transaction's address. As documented in issue #209 and [#1168](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/1168) , this is an "unfortunate" placement for such an action. The current placement creates a confusing UX scenario where the outcome of the action is ambiguous.
**Example of Ambiguous Behavior:**
The context menu gives the wrong impression that the `Edit Label` action will edit a `Label` for the specific transaction that has been right-clicked on. This impression can be because all other actions in this menu will relate to the specific transaction and the misconception between `Comment` and `Label`.
<img width="1062" alt="editlabel-start" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23396902/108296385-6da48200-7167-11eb-89f0-b21ccc58f6f4.png">
Let's say I wanted to give the transaction selected in the screenshot above a comment of "2-17[17:43]". Given all the context clues, it will be reasonable to assume that the `Edit Label` function will give a label to this transaction. Instead, it edits the `Label` for the address behind this transaction. Thus, changing the `Label` for all transactions associated with this address.
<img width="971" alt="editlabel-end" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23396902/108297179-e35d1d80-7168-11eb-86a9-0d2796c51829.png">
**Maintaining `Edit Label` Functionality:**
The action of Editing a Label should instead be reserved for the respective address tables of the `Send` and `Receive` tabs. As documented in this [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/issues/209#issuecomment-780922101), `Edit Label` is currently implemented in the `Send` tab and is missing in the `Receive` tab. A follow-up PR can add the `Edit Label` functionality to the `Receive` tab.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 8f9644890a
Talkless:
tACK 8f9644890a, tested on Debian Sid.
Tree-SHA512: 70bbcc8be3364b0d4f476a9760aa14ad1ad1f53b0b130ce0ffe75190d76c386e6e26c530c0a55d1742402fe2b45c68a2af6dbfaf58ee9909ad93b06f0b6559d4
142807af8b gui: display BIP152 high bandwidth relay in peer details (Jon Atack)
9476886353 gui: display fRelayTxes in peer details (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This pull adds two fields to the peer details, "Wants Tx Relay" (fRelayTxes) and "High Bandwidth" (bip152_highbandwidth to/from). See the added tooltips for more info.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 142807af8b
jarolrod:
ACK 142807af8b
Tree-SHA512: 956c7fa54c9c2ea76ee879d370711be0bed4af05484a17d35a1dd77713ed34ff441ed3957d0ef3a7ca7cf59a2f5d898be49b12af609a16b3e3cbfc4a1ba8f54e
8353e8cecc peers-tab: bug fix right panel toggle (randymcmillan)
Pull request description:
Initial Presentation:
When node row selected - panel is presented:
When network disabled - right panel is hidden:
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
ACK 8353e8cecc
jonatack:
ACK 8353e8cecc tested rebased on current master. Behavior is initially a bit surprising but this would allow more columns to be added to the peers tab window. Verified that selecting more than one peer, clicking on a column header, or running `disconnectnode "" <currently-selected-peer-id>` in the console (or on the CLI with the `-server` startup option) returns the window to its full size. If this is merged, it might be nice to have an obvious way to close the details area like a clickable "close this" icon in the upper left corner of the area.
Talkless:
tACK 8353e8cecc, tested on Debian Sid. Made `bitcoind` connect to `bitcoin-qt` with the PR changes, and after I quit the `bitcoind` instance, right panel do disappear, compared to the previous commit where it didn't.
Tree-SHA512: 8fc156f40bdd61e3ba8db333c729a2a07fd5f0fd1eed56f2fd2aa5ae5864756f8ab6fad74ae2fb0552ee7518b6d489f5800709e6c80c6f31f61fd8ce21cece5f
be4cf4832f gui: update to "Direction/Type" peer details name/tooltip (Jon Atack)
151888383a gui: add "Type" column to Peers main window (Jon Atack)
6fc72bd6f0 gui: allow ConnectionTypeToQString to prepend direction optionally (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This pull:
- adds a sortable `Type` column to the GUI Peers tab window
- updates the peer details row to `Direction/Type`, so the `Type` column without a direction makes sense (the tooltip is also updated)
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
ACK be4cf4832f
leonardojobim:
Tested ACK be4cf4832f on Ubuntu 20.04 on VMWare.
Tree-SHA512: 6c6d1dbe7d6bdb616acff0aaf8f4223546f1d2524566e9cd6e5b1b3bed2be1e9b20b1bc52ed3b627df53ba1f2fe0bc76f036cf16ad934d8a446b515d9bece3b1
If a user is only interested in building for Linux, this saves
downloading the macOS compiler and additional dependencies.
This will result in a few additional `make` invocations, for the Linux
hosts, however this is quite low overhead.
Co-authored-by: Carl Dong <contact@carldong.me>
Setting the "Monospace" font family in a `*.ui` file does not work on
macOS, at least on Big Sur with Qt 5.15 (neither via the "font" property
nor via the "styleSheet" property). Qt chooses the ".AppleSystemUIFont"
instead of ".AppleSystemUIFontMonospaced".
This change makes macOS choose the correct monospaced font.
