CheckInputs() used to check no double spends, scripts & sigs and amounts. Since
832e0744cb, the double spend and amount checks
have been moved to CheckTxInputs(), and CheckInputs() now just validates
input scripts. Rename the function to CheckInputScripts().
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i -E -e 's/CheckInputs\b/CheckInputScripts/g' $(git grep -l CheckInputs | grep -v doc/)
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
5506ecfe7a [refactor] Replace global int nScriptCheckThreads with bool (John Newbery)
d9957623b4 [tests] Don't use TestingSetup in the checkqueue_tests (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
The meaning of this value is confusing. Refactor it and add comments.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
ACK 5506ecfe7a
promag:
ACK 5506ecfe7a, only change was addressing my nits.
laanwj:
Code review ACK 5506ecfe7a
MarcoFalke:
ACK 5506ecfe7a🥐
Tree-SHA512: 78536727c98d2c23f3c0f3f169131474fef9a4486ae65029011caf06eab30f6f70ff73a65b2fb04a5d969fc1150858d1c6ea4767f04d48c1eea6b829316d0e63
The global nScriptCheckThreads int is confusing and is only needed for
its int-ness in AppInitMain. Move all `-par` parsing logic there and
replace the int nScriptCheckThreads with a bool
g_parallel_script_checks.
Also tidy up logic and improve comments.
dcef9a2922 logs: add timing information to FlushStateToDisk() (James O'Beirne)
41edaf227a logs: add BCLog::Timer and related macros (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
It's currently annoying to detect FlushStateToDisk() calls when benchmarking since they have to be inferred from a drop in coins count from the `UpdateTip: ` log messages. This adds a new logging utility, `BCLog::Timer`, and some related macros that are generally useful for printing timing-related logging messages, and a message that is unconditionally written when the coins cache is flushed to disk.
```
2019-09-04T20:17:51Z FlushStateToDisk: write block and undo data to disk completed (3ms)
2019-09-04T20:17:51Z FlushStateToDisk: write block index to disk completed (370ms)
2019-09-04T20:17:51Z FlushStateToDisk: write coins cache to disk (2068451 coins, 294967kB) completed (21481ms)
```
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Thanks, ACK dcef9a2922
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK dcef9a2922. No changes since last review other than moving code to new timer.h header
Tree-SHA512: 6d61e48a062d3edb48d0e056a6f0b1f8031773cc99289ee4544f8349d24526b88519e1e304009d56e428f1eaf76c857bf8e7e1c0b6873a6f270306accb5edc3d
To do so we update CValidationInterface::BlockDisconnect to take a
CBlockIndex pointing to the block being disconnected.
This new parameter will be use in the following commit to establish
wallet height.
Instead of keeping pindexBestHeader set to the best header we've
ever seen, reset it back to our validated tip if we find an ancestor
of it turns out to be invalid. While the name is now a bit confusing,
this matches much better with how it is used in practice, see below.
Further, this opens up more use-cases for it in the future, namely
aggressively searching for new peers in case we have discovered
(possibly via some covert channel) headers which we do not know to be
invalid, but which we cannot find block data for.
Places pindexBestHeader is used:
* Various GUI displays of the best header and getblockchaininfo["headers"],
I don't think changing this is bad, and if anything this is less confusing
in the presence of an invalid block.
* IsCurrentForFeeEstimation(): If anything I think ensuring pindexBestHeader
isn't some crazy invalid chain is better than the alternative, even in the
case where you are rejecting the current chain due to hardware error (since
hopefully in that case you won't get any new blocks anyway).
* ConnectBlock assumevalid checks: We use pindexBestHeader to check that the
block we're connecting leads to something with nMinimumChainWork (preventing
a user-set assumevalid from having bogus work) and that the block we're
connecting leads to pindexBestHeader (I'm not too worried about this one -
it's nice to "disable" assumevalid if we have a long invalid headers chain,
but I don't see it as a critical protection).
* BlockRequestAllowed() uses pindexBestHeader as its target to ensure the
requested block is within a month of the "current chain". I don't think this
is a meaningful difference, if we're rejecting the current tip we're
trivially fingerprintable anyway, and if the chain really does have a bunch
of invalid crap near the tip, using the best not-invalid header is likely a
better criteria.
* ProcessGetBlockData uses pindexBestHeader as the "current chain" definition
of whether a block request is "historical" for the purpose of bandwidth
limiting. Similarly, I don't see why this is a meaningful change.
* We use pindexBestHeader for requesting missing headers on receipt of a
headers/compact block message or block inv as well as for initial getheaders.
I think this is definitely wrong, using the best not-invalid header for such
requests is much better.
* We use pindexBestHeader to define the "current chain" for deciding when
we're close to done with initial headers sync. I don't think this is a
meaningful change.
* We use pindexBestHeader to decide if initial headers sync has timed out. If
we're rejecting the chain due to hardware error this may result in
additional cases where we ban a peer, but this is already true, so I think
its fine.
ValidationState::Invalid() takes a parameter `ret` which is returned to
the caller. All call sites set this to false. Remove the `ret` parameter
and just return false always.
This is in preparation for the next commit, which removes the useless
`ret` parameter from ValidationState::Invalid().
error() is simply a convenience wrapper that calls LogPrintf and returns
false. Call LogPrintf explicitly and substitute the error() call for a
false bool literal.
0a433fc876 [validation] Remove unused cacheSigStore from CheckInputsFromMempoolAndCache (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
CheckInputsFromMempoolAndCache() is only called in one place, and
cacheSigStore is set to true in that call site. Remove the argument
entirely.
Also improve commenting.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
unsigned ACK 0a433fc876 Comment looks good
jamesob:
ACK 0a433fc876
laanwj:
ACK 0a433fc876
fanquake:
ACK 0a433fc876. Checked that `CheckInputsFromMempoolAndCache` is only called once, in `MemPoolAccept::ConsensusScriptChecks`, and that `cacheSigStore` is true.
Tree-SHA512: e4b4d2550e35df55c8f8fa4c539174cc2d3728112ddb937cb2ff759d8630a01566b5ec42a70a82e33994e6586f5a457a75a59f64b15d27c65331c723cbb097af
CheckInputsFromMempoolAndCache() is only called in one place, and
cacheSigStore is set to true in that call site. Remove the argument
entirely.
Also improve commenting.
9075d13153 [docs] Add release notes for removal of REJECT reasons (John Newbery)
04a2f326ec [validation] Fix REJECT message comments (John Newbery)
e9d5a59e34 [validation] Remove REJECT code from CValidationState (John Newbery)
0053e16714 [logging] Don't log REJECT code when transaction is rejected (John Newbery)
a1a07cfe99 [validation] Fix peer punishment for bad blocks (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
We no longer send BIP 61 REJECT messages, so there's no need to set
a REJECT code in the CValidationState object.
Note that there is a minor bug fix in p2p behaviour here. Because the
call to `MaybePunishNode()` in `PeerLogicValidation::BlockChecked()` only
previously happened if the REJECT code was > 0 and < `REJECT_INTERNAL`,
then there are cases were `MaybePunishNode()` can get called where it
wasn't previously:
- when `AcceptBlockHeader()` fails with `CACHED_INVALID`.
- when `AcceptBlockHeader()` fails with `BLOCK_MISSING_PREV`.
Note that `BlockChecked()` cannot fail with an 'internal' reject code. The
only internal reject code was `REJECT_HIGHFEE`, which was only set in
ATMP.
This reverts a minor bug introduced in 5d08c9c579.
ACKs for top commit:
ariard:
ACK 9075d13, changes since last reviewed are splitting them in separate commits to ease understanding and fix nits
fjahr:
ACK 9075d13153, confirmed diff to last review was fixing nits in docs/comments.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 9075d13153. Only changes since last review are splitting the main commit and updating comments
Tree-SHA512: 58e8a1a4d4e6f156da5d29fb6ad6a62fc9c594bbfc6432b3252e962d0e9e10149bf3035185dc5320c46c09f3e49662bc2973ec759679c0f3412232087cb8a3a7
faec689bed txmempool: Make entry time type-safe (std::chrono) (MarcoFalke)
faaa1f01da util: Add count_seconds time helper (MarcoFalke)
1111170f2f test: mempool entry time is persisted (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This changes the type of the entry time of txs into the mempool from `int64_t` to `std::chrono::seconds`.
The benefits:
* Documents the type for developers
* Type violations result in compile errors
* After compilation, the two are equivalent (at no run time cost)
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
utACK faec689bed
laanwj:
ACK faec689bed
Tree-SHA512: d958e058755d1a1d54cef536a8b30a11cc502b7df0d6ecf84a0ab1d38bc8105a67668a99cd5087a444f6de2421238111c5fca133cdf8e2e2273cb12cb6957845
2a4e60b482 Fix block index inconsistency in InvalidateBlock() (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
Previously, we could release `cs_main` while leaving the block index in a state
that would fail `CheckBlockIndex()`, because `setBlockIndexCandidates` was not being
fully populated before releasing `cs_main`.
ACKs for top commit:
TheBlueMatt:
utACK 2a4e60b482. I also discovered another issue in InvalidateBlock while reviewing, see #16856.
Sjors:
ACK 2a4e60b. Tested on top of #16899. Also tested `invalidateblock` with `-checkblockindex=1`.
fjahr:
ACK 2a4e60b. Ran tests, reviewed code, inspected behavior while manually testing `invalidateblock`.
Tree-SHA512: ced12f9dfff0d413258c709921543fb154789898165590b30d1ee0cdc72863382f189744f7669a7c924d3689a1cc623efdf4e5ae3efc60054572c1e6826de612
fdb3e8f8b2 Ignore old versionbit activations (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
PR 16060 removed the CSV and Segwit BIP9 softfork definitions and hard-coded ('buried') the activation heights. The versionbits code will warn users if an undefined softfork has been signalled in block header versions, and removing the CSV/Segwit definitions caused those warnings to be triggered.
Change the BIP 9 warning code to only check for unknown softforks after the segwit activation height.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK fdb3e8f8b2
ajtowns:
ACK fdb3e8f8b2 for what it's worth
achow101:
ACK fdb3e8f8b2
Sjors:
ACK fdb3e8f8b2. It makes the bit 0 warning go away in mainnet and testnet QT when a new block arrives. I think the code is clear enough.
jonatack:
ACK fdb3e8f8b2
Tree-SHA512: e6fd34e8902f8c7affb28e8951803e47d542710d5f1229000746656a37ee59d754439fc33e36b7eef87544262e5aac374645db91b74cb507e73514003ca7a67f
3cf36736e5 refactoring: move ReplayBlocks under CChainState (James O'Beirne)
bcf73d3b84 refactoring: move LoadChainTip to CChainState method (James O'Beirne)
f5809d5b13 doc: fix CChainState::ActivateBestChain doc (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the [assumeutxo project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11):
Parent PR: #15606
Issue: #15605
Specification: https://github.com/jamesob/assumeutxo-docs/tree/master/proposal
---
Move more chainstate-related functionality to methods on CChainState. Nothing too interesting here, but needed to work with multiple chainstates. And brief to review. :)
Also fixes doc on ActivateBestChain.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 3cf36736e5
ryanofsky:
Can confirm. utACK 3cf36736e5. Removes wrapper functions and removes more ::ChainActive() and ::ChainstateActive() calls than it adds, so seems good.
Tree-SHA512: 4bf8a1dd454ca9d61c85f6736910fa7354c57acc0002e3a8e5ce494035d8280e4c20e066f03478eeff7d44195e7912c282a486526da9be53854b478b961affaa
c4b0c08f7c Update tx-size-small comment with relevant CVE disclosure (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
Code first introduced under https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11423 with essentially no description and no discussion.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK c4b0c08f7c
fanquake:
ACK c4b0c08f7c
Tree-SHA512: 95d5c92998b8b1e944c477dbaee265b62612b6e815099ab31d9ff580b4dff777abaf7f326a284644709f918aa1510412d62310689b1250ef6e64de7b19ca9f71
4a87c5cfdf [refactor] Rewrite AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker() using smaller parts (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
This is in preparation for re-using these validation components for a new version of AcceptToMemoryPool() that can operate on multiple transactions ("package relay").
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 4a87c5cfdf (did the rebase myself and arrived at the same result, mod whitespace)
laanwj:
ACK 4a87c5cfdf
Tree-SHA512: b0495c026ffe06146258bace3d5e0c9aaf23fa65f89f258abc4af5980812e68e63a799f1d923e78ac1ee6bcafaf1222b2c2690a527df9b65dff7b48a013f154e
0c62e3aa73 New regression testing for CVE-2018-17144, CVE-2012-2459, and CVE-2010-5137. (lucash-dev)
38bfca6bb2 Added comments referencing multiple CVEs in tests and production code. (lucash-dev)
Pull request description:
This functional test includes two scenarios that test for regressions of vulnerabilities, but they are only briefly described. There are freely available documents explaining in detail the issues, but without explicit mentions, the developer trying to maintain the code needs an additional step of digging in commit history and PR conversations to figure it out.
Added comments to explicitly mention CVE-2018-17144 and CVE-2012-2459, for more complete documentation.
This improves developer experience by making understanding the tests easier.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 0c62e3aa73, checked the CVE numbers, thanks for adding documentation
Tree-SHA512: 3ee05351745193b8b959e4a25d50f25a693b2d24b0732ed53cf7d5882df40b5dd0f1877bd5c69cffb921d4a7acf9deb3cc1160b96dc730d9b5984151ad06b7c9
This is in preparation for re-using these validation components for a new
version of AcceptToMemoryPool() that can operate on multiple transactions
("package relay").
fa912a8ad5 doc: move-only ActivateBestChain doxygen comment to header (MarcoFalke)
fa99efd054 doc: ActivateBestChainStep return value (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
It will always return true, unless a system error such as #15305 occurred
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fa912a8ad5
Tree-SHA512: d439da844a467f9705014b946d7d987fb62cb63fe6a325b2fdbbb73a6578fc0ade3f60892044f02face43948204fc4e3c9fa70d108233d4ca8eef27984059689
Previously, we could release cs_main while leaving the block index in a state
that would fail CheckBlockIndex, because setBlockIndexCandidates was not being
fully populated before releasing cs_main.
5ce822efbe Conservatively accept RBF bumps bumping one tx at the package limits (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
Based on #15681, this adds support for some simple cases of RBF inside of large packages. Issue pointed out by sdaftuar in #15681, and this fix (or a broader one) is required ot make #15681 fully useful.
Accept RBF bumps of single transactions (ie which evict exactly one
transaction) even when that transaction is a member of a package
which is currently at the package limit iff the new transaction
does not add any additional mempool dependencies from the original.
This could be made a bit looser in the future and still be safe,
but for now this fixes the case that a transaction which was
accepted by the carve-out rule will not be directly RBF'able
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
re-ACK 5ce822efbe
ajtowns:
ACK 5ce822efbe ; GetSizeWithDescendants is only change and makes sense
sipa:
Code review ACK 5ce822efbe. I haven't thought hard about the effect on potential DoS issues this policy change may have.
Tree-SHA512: 1cee3bc57393940a30206679eb60c3ec8cb4f4825d27d40d1f062c86bd22542dd5944fa5567601c74c8d9fd425333ed3e686195170925cfc68777e861844bd55
3109a1f948 refactor: Avoid locking cs_main in ProcessNewBlockHeaders (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Builds on #16774, this change avoids locking `cs_main` in `ProcessNewBlockHeaders` when the tip has changed - in this case the removed lock was necessary to just log a message.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 31be6d319fa122804f72fa813cec5ed041dd7e4aef3c1921124a1f03016925c43cd4d9a272d80093e77fa7600e3506ef47b7bb821afcbffe01e6be9bceb6dc00
Accept RBF bumps of single transactions (ie which conflict with one
transaction) even when that transaction is a member of a package
which is currently at the package limit iff the new transaction
does not add any additional mempool dependencies from the original.
This could be made a bit looser in the future and still be safe,
but for now this fixes the case that a transaction which was
accepted by the carve-out rule will not be directly RBF'able.
dcc448e3d2 Avoid unnecessary "Synchronizing blockheaders" log messages (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
Fixes#16773
I'm not entirely sure why 16773 happend, but probably due to headers fallback in a compact block.
However, this PR should fix it and should have been included in #15615.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK dcc448e3d2 ; code review only, haven't compiled or tested.
promag:
ACK dcc448e3d2.
TheBlueMatt:
utACK dcc448e3d2. Went and read how pindexBestHeader is handled and this code looks correct (worst case it breaks a LogPrint, so whatever). I also ran into this on #16762.
fanquake:
ACK dcc448e3d2
Tree-SHA512: f8cac3b6eb9d4e8fab53a535b55f9ea9b058e3ab6ade64801ebc56439ede4f54b5fee36d5d2b316966ab987b65b13ab9dc18849f345d08b81ecdf2722a3f5f5a
9b92538ade Remove unused fScriptChecks parameter from CheckInputs (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
fScriptChecks = false just short-circuits the entire function, so
passing it in is entirely useless.
This is extracted from #13233 /cc TheBlueMatt.
Recommend reviewing with `git show --ignore-all-space`, i.e.:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13868/files?w=1
ACKs for top commit:
TheBlueMatt:
utACK 9b92538ade. Checked diff had no functional change and new comment copy looks correct.
kallewoof:
ACK 9b92538ade
ajtowns:
ACK 9b92538ade ; code review, checked tests work. Looks right to me, and fanquake's notes make sense. Could change the coinbase early exit to `assert(!tx.IsCoinBase());`.
fanquake:
ACK 9b92538ade - Notes / testing below.
Tree-SHA512: add253a3e8cf4b33eddbc49efcec333c14b5ea61c7d34e43230351d40cff6adc919a75b91c72c4de8647a395284db74a61639f4c67848d4b2fec3a705b557790
d75e704ac0 Add log output during initial header sync (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
The non debug log output is completely quiet during the header sync. I see two main reasons to add infos about the state of the initial header sync...
* users may think the node did fail to start sync
* it's a little complicate to check if your getting throttled during header sync (repeatedly calling `getchaintips` or similar)
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
Concept ACK d75e704ac0
practicalswift:
utACK d75e704ac0
laanwj:
Tested ACK d75e704ac0
Tree-SHA512: 2e738571b703d7251290864603c3a829729645962c2fa3187250bab0585e66a5f01fce892e9b5b98da451fab2b40a2e4784f9b2e5a9cad75ff62c535affe7430
e78aaf41f4 [docs] Add release notes for burying bip 9 soft fork deployments (John Newbery)
8319e738f9 [tests] Add coverage for the content of getblockchaininfo.softforks (James O'Beirne)
0328dcdcfc [Consensus] Bury segwit deployment (John Newbery)
1c93b9b31c [Consensus] Bury CSV deployment height (John Newbery)
3862e473f0 [rpc] Tidy up reporting of buried and ongoing softforks (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
This hardcodes CSV and segwit activation heights, similar to the BIP 90 buried deployments for BIPs 34, 65 and 66.
CSV and segwit have been active for over 18 months. Hardcoding the activation height is a code simplification, makes it easier to understand segwit activation status, and reduces technical debt.
This was originally attempted by jl2012 in #11398 and again by me in #12360.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK e78aaf41f4 ; checked diff to previous acked commit, checked tests still work
ariard:
ACK e78aaf4, check diff, run the tests again and successfully activated csv/segwit heights on mainnet as expected.
MarcoFalke:
ACK e78aaf41f4 (still didn't check if the mainnet block heights are correct, but the code looks good now)
Tree-SHA512: 7e951829106e21a81725f7d3e236eddbb59349189740907bb47e33f5dbf95c43753ac1231f47ae7bee85c8c81b2146afcdfdc11deb1503947f23093a9c399912
