f685a13bef doc: GetTransaction()/getrawtransaction follow-ups to #22383 (John Newbery)
abc57e1f08 refactor: move `GetTransaction(...)` to node/transaction.cpp (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
~This PR is based on #22383, which should be reviewed first~ (merged by now).
In [yesterday's PR review club session to PR 22383](https://bitcoincore.reviews/22383), the idea of moving the function `GetTransaction(...)` from src/validation.cpp to src/node/transaction.cpp came up. With this, the circular dependency "index/txindex -> validation -> index/txindex" is removed (see change in `lint-circular-dependencies.sh`). Thanks to jnewbery for suggesting and to sipa for providing historical background.
Relevant IRC log:
```
17:52 <jnewbery> Was anyone surprised that GetTransaction() is in validation.cpp? It seems to me that node/transaction.cpp would be a more appropriate place for it.
17:53 <raj_> jnewbery, +1
17:53 <stickies-v> agreed!
17:54 <glozow> jnewbery ya
17:54 <jnewbery> seems weird that validation would call into txindex. I wonder if we remove this function, then validation would no longer need to #include txindex
17:54 <sipa> GetTransaction predates node/transaction.cpp, and even the generic index framework itself :)
17:55 <sipa> (before 0.8, validation itself used the txindex)
17:55 <jnewbery> (and GetTransaction() seems like a natural sibling to BroadcastTransaction(), which is already in node/transaction.cpp)
17:55 <jnewbery> sipa: right, this is not meant as a criticism of course. Just wondering if we can organize things a bit more rationally now that we have better separation between things.
17:55 <sipa> jnewbery: sure, just providing background
17:56 <sipa> seems very reasonable to move it elsewhere now
```
The commit should be trivial to review with `--color-moved`.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK f685a13bef
rajarshimaitra:
tACK f685a13bef
mjdietzx:
crACK f685a13bef
LarryRuane:
Code review, test ACK f685a13bef
Tree-SHA512: 0e844a6ecb1be04c638b55bc4478c2949549a4fcae01c984eee078de74d176fb19d508fc09360a62ad130677bfa7daf703b67870800e55942838d7313246248c
78f4c8b98e prefer to use txindex if available for GetTransaction (Jameson Lopp)
Pull request description:
Fixes#22382
Motivation: prevent excessive disk reads if txindex is enabled.
Worth noting that this could be argued to be less of a bug and more of an issue of undefined behavior. If a user calls GetTransaction with the wrong block hash, what should happen?
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 78f4c8b98e
theStack:
Code review ACK 78f4c8b98e
LarryRuane:
tACK 78f4c8b98e
luke-jr:
utACK 78f4c8b98e
jnewbery:
utACK 78f4c8b98e
rajarshimaitra:
Code review ACK 78f4c8b98e
lsilva01:
Code Review ACK and Tested ACK 78f4c8b98e on Ubuntu 20.04
Tree-SHA512: af7db5b98cb2ae4897b28476b2fa243bf7e6f850750d9347062fe8013c5720986d1a3c808f80098e5289bd84b085de03c81a44e584dc28982f721c223651bfe0
a806647d26 [validation] Always include merkle root in coinbase commitment (Dhruv Mehta)
189128c220 [validation] Set witness script flag with p2sh for blocks (Dhruv Mehta)
ac82b99db7 [p2p] remove redundant NODE_WITNESS checks (Dhruv Mehta)
6f8b198b82 [p2p] remove unused segwitheight=-1 option (Dhruv Mehta)
eba5b1cd64 [test] remove or move tests using `-segwitheight=-1` (Dhruv Mehta)
Pull request description:
Builds on #21009 and makes progress on remaining items in #17862
Removing `RewindBlockIndex()` in #21009 allows the following:
- removal of tests using `segwitheight=-1` in `p2p_segwit.py`.
- move `test_upgrade_after_activation()` out of `p2p_segwit.py` reducing runtime
- in turn, that allows us to drop support for `-segwitheight=-1`, which is only supported for that test.
- that allows us to always set `NODE_WITNESS` in our local services. The only reason we don't do that is to support `-segwitheight=-1`.
- that in turn allows us to drop all of the `GetLocalServices() & NODE_WITNESS` checks inside `net_processing.cpp`, since our local services would always include `NODE_WITNESS`
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
Code-Review ACK a806647d26
laanwj:
Code review ACK a806647d26, nice cleanup
jnewbery:
utACK a806647d26
theStack:
ACK a806647d26
Tree-SHA512: 73e1a69d1d7eca1f5c38558ec6672decd0b60b16c2ef6134df6f6af71bb159e6eea160f9bb5ab0eb6723c6632d29509811e29469d0d87abbe9b69a2890fbc73e
ceb7b35a39 refactor: move UpdateTip into CChainState (James O'Beirne)
4abf0779d6 refactor: no mempool arg to GetCoinsCacheSizeState (James O'Beirne)
46e3efd1e4 refactor: move UpdateMempoolForReorg into CChainState (James O'Beirne)
617661703a validation: make CChainState::m_mempool optional (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
Make `CChainState::m_mempool` optional by making it a pointer instead of a reference. This will allow a simplification to assumeutxo semantics (see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15606#pullrequestreview-692965905) and help facilitate the `-nomempool` option.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK ceb7b35a39
naumenkogs:
ACK ceb7b35a39
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK ceb7b35a39 (just minor style and test tweaks since last review)
lsilva01:
Code review ACK and tested on Signet ACK ceb7b35a39
MarcoFalke:
review ACK ceb7b35a39😌
Tree-SHA512: cc445ad33439d5918cacf80a6354eea8f3d33bb7719573ed5b970fad1a0dab410bcd70be44c862b8aba1b71263b82d79876688c553e339362653dfb3d8ec81e6
Since we now have multiple chainstate objects, only one of them is active at any given
time. An active chainstate has a mempool, but there's no point to others having one.
This change will simplify proposed assumeutxo semantics. See the discussion here:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15606#pullrequestreview-692965905
Co-authored-by: Russell Yanofsky <russ@yanofsky.org>
Adds support for versionbits deployments to DeploymentEnabled,
DeploymentActiveAfter and DeploymentActiveAt. Also moves versionbitscache
from validation to deploymentstatus.
Provides DeploymentEnabled, DeploymentActiveAt, and DeploymentActiveAfter
helpers for checking the status of buried deployments. Can be overloaded
so the same syntax works for non-buried deployments, allowing future
soft forks to be changed from signalled to buried deployments without
having to touch the implementation code.
Replaces IsWitnessEnabled and IsScriptWitnessEnabled.
fa0d9211ef refactor: Remove chainparams arg from CChainState member functions (MarcoFalke)
fa38947125 refactor: Remove ::Params() global from inside CChainState member functions (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The `::Params()` global is verbose and confusing. Also it makes tests a bit harder to write because they'd have to mock a global.
Fix all issues by simply using a member variable that points to the right params.
(Can be reviewed with `--word-diff-regex=.`)
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK fa0d9211ef
kiminuo:
utACK fa0d9211
theStack:
ACK fa0d9211ef🍉
Tree-SHA512: 44676b19c9ed471ccb536331d3029bad192d7d50f394fd7b8527ec431452aeec8c4494164b9cf8e16e0123c4463b16be864366c6b599370032c17262625a0356
fa9ebedec3 Reject invalid coin height and output index when loading assumeutxo (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
It should be impossible to have a coin at a height higher than the height of the snapshot block, so reject those early to avoid integer wraparounds and hash collisions later on.
Same for the outpoint index.
Both issues were found by fuzzing:
* The height issue by OSS-Fuzz: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=34793
* The outpoint issue by my fuzz server: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=34793#c2
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK fa9ebedec3: patch looks correct
jamesob:
crACK fa9ebedec3
theStack:
Code review ACK fa9ebedec3
benthecarman:
crACK fa9ebedec3
Tree-SHA512: dae7caee4b3862b23ebdf2acb7edec4baf75b0dbf1409b370b1a73aa6b632b317ebfac596dcbaf4edfb1301b513f45465ea75328962460f35e2af0d7e547c9ac
2eb0eeda39 validation: document lack of inherited signaling in RBF policy (Antoine Riard)
906b6d9da6 test: Extend feature_rbf.py with no inherited signaling (Antoine Riard)
Pull request description:
Contrary to BIP125 or other full-node implementation (e.g btcd), Bitcoin Core's mempool policy doesn't implement inherited signaling.
This PR documents our mempool behavior on this and add a test demonstrating the case.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 2eb0eeda39
benthecarman:
ACK 2eb0eeda39
Tree-SHA512: d41453d3b49bae3c1eb532a968f43bc047084913bd285929d4d9cba142777ff2be38163d912e28dfc635f4ecf446de68effad799c6e71be52f81e83410c712fb
* Rename RewindBlockIndex -> NeedsRedownload (follow-up to commit
d831e711ca)
* Fix typos
* Inline comments about faking chain data to avoid duplicating them
13650fe2e5 [policy] detect unsorted packages (glozow)
9ef643e21b [doc] add release note for package testmempoolaccept (glozow)
c4259f4b7e [test] functional test for packages in RPCs (glozow)
9ede34a6f2 [rpc] allow multiple txns in testmempoolaccept (glozow)
ae8e6df709 [policy] limit package sizes (glozow)
c9e1a26d1f [fuzz] add ProcessNewPackage call in tx_pool fuzzer (glozow)
363e3d916c [test] unit tests for ProcessNewPackage (glozow)
cd9a11ac96 [test] make submit optional in CreateValidMempoolTransaction (glozow)
2ef187941d [validation] package validation for test accepts (glozow)
578148ded6 [validation] explicit Success/Failure ctors for MempoolAcceptResult (glozow)
b88d77aec5 [policy] Define packages (glozow)
249f43f3cc [refactor] add option to disable RBF (glozow)
897e348f59 [coins/mempool] extend CCoinsViewMemPool to track temporary coins (glozow)
42cf8b25df [validation] make CheckSequenceLocks context-free (glozow)
Pull request description:
This PR enables validation dry-runs of packages through the `testmempoolaccept` RPC. The expectation is that the results returned from `testmempoolaccept` are what you'd get from test-then-submitting each transaction individually, in that order (this means the package is expected to be sorted in topological order, for now at least). The validation is also atomic: in the case of failure, it immediately halts and may return "unfinished" `MempoolAcceptResult`s for transactions that weren't fully validated. The API for 1 transaction stays the same.
**Motivation:**
- This allows you to test validity for transaction chains (e.g. with multiple spending paths and where you don't want to broadcast yet); closes#18480.
- It's also a first step towards package validation in a minimally invasive way.
- The RPC commit happens to close#21074 by clarifying the "allowed" key.
There are a few added restrictions on the packages, mostly to simplify the logic for areas that aren't critical to main package use cases:
- No package can have conflicts, i.e. none of them can spend the same inputs, even if it would be a valid BIP125 replacement.
- The package cannot conflict with the mempool, i.e. RBF is disabled.
- The total count of the package cannot exceed 25 (the default descendant count limit), and total size cannot exceed 101KvB (the default descendant size limit).
If you're looking for review comments and github isn't loading them, I have a gist compiling some topics of discussion [here](https://gist.github.com/glozow/c3acaf161c95bba491fce31585b2aaf7)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review re-ACK 13650fe2e5
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 13650fe2e5
ariard:
ACK 13650fe
Tree-SHA512: 8c5cbfa91a6c714e1c8710bb281d5ff1c5af36741872a7c5df6b24874d6272b4a09f816cb8a4c7de33ef8e1c2a2c252c0df5105b7802f70bc6ff821ed7cc1a2f
Maximum number of transactions allowed in a package is 25, equal to the
default mempool descendant limit: if a package has more transactions
than this, either it would fail default mempool descendant limit or the
transactions don't all have a dependency relationship (but then they
shouldn't be in a package together). Same rationale for 101KvB virtual
size package limit.
Note that these policies are only used in test accepts so far.
Only allow test accepts for now. Use the CoinsViewTemporary to keep
track of coins created by each transaction so that subsequent
transactions can spend them. Uncache all coins since we only
ever do test accepts (Note this is different from ATMP which doesn't
uncache for valid test_accepts) to minimize impact on the coins cache.
Require that the input txns have no conflicts and be ordered
topologically. This commit isn't able to detect unsorted packages.
Allow CheckSequenceLocks to use heights and coins from any CoinsView and
CBlockIndex provided. This means that CheckSequenceLocks() doesn't need
to hold the mempool lock or cs_main. The caller is responsible for
ensuring the CoinsView and CBlockIndex are consistent before passing
them in. The typical usage is still to create a CCoinsViewMemPool from
the mempool and grab the CBlockIndex from the chainstate tip.
