ddddd6913b sort after scripted-diff (MacroFake)
fac812ca83 scripted-diff: Move mempool_args to src/node (MacroFake)
66664384a6 Remove ::g_max_datacarrier_bytes global (MacroFake)
fad0b4fab8 Pass datacarrier setting into IsStandard (MacroFake)
fa2a6b8516 Combine datacarrier globals into one (MacroFake)
fa477d32ee Remove ::GetVirtualTransactionSize() alias (MacroFake)
fa2f6c1a61 Remove ::fIsBareMultisigStd global (MacroFake)
fadc14e4f5 Remove ::dustRelayFee (MacroFake)
fa8a7f01fe Remove ::IsStandardTx(tx, reason) alias (MacroFake)
fa7a9114e5 test: Remove unused cs_main (MacroFake)
fa9cba7afb Remove ::incrementalRelayFee and ::minRelayTxFee globals (MacroFake)
fa148602e6 Remove ::fRequireStandard global (MacroFake)
fa468bdfb6 Return optional error from ApplyArgsManOptions (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
This change is good because:
* It moves module-specific init-logic out of the bloated init.cpp
* It removes a global from validation.cpp and places it into the data structure that needs it (mempool)
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
re ACK ddddd69
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK ddddd6913b
ariard:
Light Code Review ACK ddddd69
Tree-SHA512: 9de2ce601cfcaa4dfd7d1c92270568895ce8702ccdffb59829fbe9618eab0fd88d738afef33ed66988c66861115e0340e881056bfb71e2aed4af2440bd37eb1e
9e04cfaa76 test: add coverage for wallet inconsistent state during sync (furszy)
77de5c693f wallet: guard and alert about a wallet invalid state during chain sync (furszy)
Pull request description:
Follow-up work to my comment in #25239.
Guarding and alerting the user about a wallet invalid state during chain synchronization.
#### Explanation
if the `AddToWallet` tx write fails, the method returns a wtx `nullptr` without removing the recently added transaction from the wallet's map.
Which makes that `AddToWalletIfInvolvingMe` return false (even when the tx is on the wallet's map already), --> which makes `SyncTransaction` skip the `MarkInputsDirty` call --> which leads to a wallet invalid state where the inputs of this new transaction are not marked dirty, while the transaction that spends them still exist on the in-memory wallet tx map.
Plus, as we only store the arriving transaction inside `AddToWalletIfInvolvingMe` when we synchronize/scan block/s from the chain and nowhere else, it makes sense to treat the transaction db write error as a runtime error to notify the user about the problem. Otherwise, the user will lose all the not stored transactions after a wallet shutdown (without be able to recover them automatically on the next startup because the chain sync would be above the block where the txs arrived).
Note:
On purpose, the first commit adds test coverage for it. Showing how the wallet can end up in an invalid state. The second commit corrects it with the proposed solution.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 9e04cfaa76
jonatack:
ACK 9e04cfaa76
Tree-SHA512: 81f765eca40547d7764833d8ccfae686b67c7728c84271bc00dc51272de643dafc270014079dcc9727b47577ba67b340aeb5f981588b54e69a06abea6958aa96
4bedfd702a refactor: remove unneeded temporaries in node/interfaces, simplify code (Jon Atack)
b27ba169eb refactor: make all NodeImpl/ChainImpl/ExternalSignerImpl members public (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
- Make all `NodeImpl`, `ChainImpl` and `ExternalSignerImpl` class members `public` (and document why), to be consistent in all the `*Impl` classes in `src/node/interfaces.cpp` and `src/wallet/interfaces.cpp` and to help future reviewers and contributors.
- Remove unneeded temporaries in `NodeImpl` and `ChainImpl` methods in `src/node/interfaces.cpp` and simplify, to make the code easier to read and understand and to improve performance by avoiding unnecessary move operations.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 4bedfd702a. Changes since last review, applying suggested style & simplifiying first commit. Also avoiding another lock in second commit.
Tree-SHA512: 112f7cad5e2838c94c5b79d61328f42fe75fdb97f401ab49eccf696fc2c6a8a0c0ee55ec974c0602acf7423f78bb82e90eb8a0cc531e1d3347f73b7c83685504
ab3c06db1a doc: Release notes for default RBF (Andrew Chow)
61d9149e78 rpc: Default rbf enabled (Andrew Chow)
e3c33637ba wallet: Enable -walletrbf by default (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
The GUI currently opts in to RBF by default, but RPCs do not, and `-walletrbf` is default disabled. This PR makes the default in those two places to also opt in.
The last time this was proposed (#9527), the primary objections were the novelty at the time, the inability to bump transactions, and the gui not having the option to disable rbf. In the 5 years since, RBF usage has steadily grown, with ~27% of txs opting in. The GUI has the option to enable/disable RBF, and is also defaulted to having it enabled. And we have the ability to bump RBF'd transactions in both the RPC and the GUI. So I think it makes sense to finally change the default to always opt in to RBF.
ACKs for top commit:
darosior:
reACK ab3c06db1a
aureleoules:
ACK ab3c06db1a.
glozow:
utACK ab3c06db1a
Tree-SHA512: 81b012c5033e270f86a87a6a196ccc549eb54b158eebf88e917cc6621d40d7bdcd1566b602688907dd5d364b95a557b29f97dce869cea512e339588262c027b6
as the classes themselves are private, and to be consistent within all the
*Impl classes in src/node/interfaces.cpp and src/wallet/interfaces.cpp
following this order:
public:
// ... virtual methods ...
// ... nonvirtual helper methods ...
// ... data members ...
and add documentation in src/node/interfaces.cpp and src/wallet/interfaces.cpp
to help future reviewers and contributors.
71d1d13627 test: add unit test for AvailableCoins (josibake)
da03cb41a4 test: functional test for new coin selection logic (josibake)
438e04845b wallet: run coin selection by `OutputType` (josibake)
77b0707206 refactor: use CoinsResult struct in SelectCoins (josibake)
2e67291ca3 refactor: store by OutputType in CoinsResult (josibake)
Pull request description:
# Concept
Following https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23789, Bitcoin Core wallet will now generate a change address that matches the payment address type. This improves privacy by not revealing which of the outputs is the change at the time of the transaction in scenarios where the input address types differ from the payment address type. However, information about the change can be leaked in a later transaction. This proposal attempts to address that concern.
## Leaking information in a later transaction
Consider the following scenario:
1. Alice has a wallet with bech32 type UTXOs and pays Bob, who gives her a P2SH address
2. Alice's wallet generates a P2SH change output, preserving her privacy in `txid: a`
3. Alice then pays Carol, who gives her a bech32 address
4. Alice's wallet combines the P2SH UTXO with a bech32 UTXO and `txid: b` has two bech32 outputs
From a chain analysis perspective, it is reasonable to infer that the P2SH input in `txid: b` was the change from `txid: a`. To avoid leaking information in this scenario, Alice's wallet should avoid picking the P2SH output and instead fund the transaction with only bech32 Outputs. If the payment to Carol can be funded with just the P2SH output, it should be preferred over the bech32 outputs as this will convert the P2SH UTXO to bech32 UTXOs via the payment and change outputs of the new transaction.
**TLDR;** Avoid mixing output types, spend non-default `OutputTypes` when it is economical to do so.
# Approach
`AvailableCoins` now populates a struct, which makes it easier to access coins by `OutputType`. Coin selection tries to find a funding solution by each output type and chooses the most economical by waste metric. If a solution can't be found without mixing, coin selection runs over the entire wallet, allowing mixing, which is the same as the current behavior.
I've also added a functional test (`test/functional/wallet_avoid_mixing_output_types.py`) and unit test (`src/wallet/test/availablecoins_tests.cpp`.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 71d1d13627
aureleoules:
ACK 71d1d13627.
Xekyo:
reACK 71d1d13627 via `git range-diff master 6530d19 71d1d13`
LarryRuane:
ACK 71d1d13627
Tree-SHA512: 2e0716efdae5adf5479446fabc731ae81d595131d3b8bade98b64ba323d0e0c6d964a67f8c14c89c428998bda47993fa924f3cfca1529e2bd49eaa4e31b7e426
fa28d0f3c3 scripted-diff: Replace NullUniValue with UniValue::VNULL (MacroFake)
fa962103e8 fuzz: refactor: Replace NullUniValue with UniValue{} (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
This refactor is needed to disable the (potentially expensive for large json) UniValue copy constructors.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fa28d0f3c3
Tree-SHA512: 7d4204cce0a6fc4ecda96973de77d15b7e4c7caa3e0e890e1f5b9a4b9ace8b240b1f7565d6ab586e168a5fa1201b6c60a924868ef34d6abfbfd8ab7f0f99fbc7
This is required for removing the UniValue copy constructor.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i 's/return NullUniValue/return UniValue::VNULL/g' $(git grep -l NullUniValue ':(exclude)src/univalue')
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
fa23c19750 univalue: Avoid narrowing and verbose int constructors (MacroFake)
fa3a9a1e8d rpc: Select int-UniValue constructor for enum value in upgradewallet RPC (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
As UniValue provides several constructors for integral types, the
compiler is unable to select one if the passed type does not exactly
match. This is unintuitive for developers and forces them to write
verbose and brittle code. (Refer to `-Wnarrowing` compiler warning)
For example, there are many places where an unsigned int is cast to a
signed int. While the cast is safe in practice, it is still needlessly
verbose and confusing as the value can never be negative. In fact it
might even be unsafe if the unsigned value is large enough to map to a
negative signed one.
Fix this issue and other (minor) type issues.
ACKs for top commit:
aureleoules:
ACK fa23c19750.
Tree-SHA512: 7d99b5b90c7d8eed2e3448167255a59e817dd6b8fcfc1b17c69ddefd0db33d1bf4344fbcd8b7f8685b58182c0f572ab9ffa99467afa666ac21843df7ea645033
faf9accd66 Use HashWriter where possible (MacroFake)
faa5425629 Add HashWriter without ser-type and ser-version (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
This was done in the context of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25284 , but I think it also makes sense standalone.
The basic idea is that serialization type should not be initialized when it is not needed. Same for the serialization version.
So do this here for `HashWriter`. `CHashWriter` remains in places where it is not yet possible.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK faf9accd66
Empact:
utACK faf9accd66
Tree-SHA512: 544cc712436e49f6e608120bcd3ddc5ea72dd236554ce30fb6cfff34a92d7e67b6e6527336ad0f5b6365e2b2884f4c6508aef775953ccd9312f17752729703f2
47ea70fbb8 wallet: clean AllInputsMine code, use InputIsMine internally (furszy)
bf310b0e8c wallet: clean InputIsMine code, use GetWalletTx (furszy)
0cb177263c wallet: unify CachedTxGetImmatureCredit and CachedTxGetImmatureWatchOnlyCredit (furszy)
04c6423f7b wallet: remove always true 'fUseCache' arg from CachedTxGetAvailableCredit (furszy)
4f0ca9bff6 wallet: remove always false 'recalculate' arg from GetCachableAmount (furszy)
47b1012677 wallet: remove always true 'fUseCache' from CachedTxGetImmatureWatchOnlyCredit (furszy)
da8f62de2c wallet: remove always true 'fUseCache' from CachedTxGetImmatureCredit (furszy)
Pull request description:
Another wallet's code garbage collector work. Part of the `mapWallet` encapsulation goal.
Focused on the following points:
1) Remove always true `fUseCache` argument from `CachedTxGetImmatureCredit`, `CachedTxGetImmatureWatchOnly` and `CachedTxGetAvailableCredit`.
2) Remove always false `recalculate` argument from `GetCachableAmount`.
3) Merge `CachedTxGetImmatureCredit` and `CachedTxGetImmatureWatchOnlyCredit` as they do share the exact same code.
4) Clean `InputIsMine` method; use `GetWalletTx` instead of access the wallet's map directly.
5) Clean `AllInputsMine` method; use `InputIsMine` instead of duplicate the exact same code internally.
ACKs for top commit:
aureleoules:
re-ACK 47ea70fbb8
achow101:
ACK 47ea70fbb8
theStack:
re-ACK 47ea70fbb8
Tree-SHA512: e9b64b57de7be6165c5e5552e28cd8a03d4736b0a3707d29d129e3a0a3db6a855c2abf47a24917236060835a297b564a97b66d4c8b178d6bdafb93a12a7c0b40
7878f97bf1 indexes, refactor: Remove CChainState use in index CommitInternal method (Ryan Ofsky)
ee3a079fab indexes, refactor: Remove CBlockIndex* uses in index Rewind methods (Ryan Ofsky)
dc971be083 indexes, refactor: Remove CBlockIndex* uses in index WriteBlock methods (Ryan Ofsky)
bef4e405f3 indexes, refactor: Remove CBlockIndex* uses in index Init methods (Ryan Ofsky)
addb4f2af1 indexes, refactor: Remove CBlockIndex* uses in coinstatsindex LookUpOne function (Ryan Ofsky)
33b4d48cfc indexes, refactor: Pass Chain interface instead of CChainState class to indexes (Ryan Ofsky)
a0b5b4ae5a interfaces, refactor: Add more block information to block connected notifications (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
Start transitioning index code away from using internal node types like `CBlockIndex` and `CChain` so index code is less coupled to node code and index code will later be able to stop locking cs_main and sync without having to deal with validationinterface race conditions, and so new indexes are easier to write and can run as plugins or separate processes.
This PR contains the first 7 commits from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24230#issuecomment-1165625977 which have been split off for easier review. Previous review comments can be found in #24230
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 7878f97bf1 though did not review the last commit 🤼
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK 7878f97bf1
Tree-SHA512: f84ac2eb6dca2c305566ddeb35ea14d0b71c00860c0fd752bbcf1a0188be833d8c2a6ac9d3ef6ab5b46fbd02d7a24cbb8f60cf12464cb8ba208e22287f709989
Run coin selection on each OutputType separately, choosing the best
solution according to the waste metric.
This is to avoid mixing UTXOs that are of different OutputTypes,
which can hurt privacy.
If no single OutputType can fund the transaction, then coin selection
considers the entire wallet, potentially mixing (current behavior).
This is done inside AttemptSelection so that all OutputTypes are
considered at each back-off in coin selection.
Pass the whole CoinsResult struct to SelectCoins instead of only a
vector. This means we now have to remove preselected coins from each
OutputType vector and shuffle each vector individually.
Pass the whole CoinsResult struct to AttemptSelection. This involves
moving the logic in AttemptSelection to a newly named function,
ChooseSelectionResult. This will allow us to run ChooseSelectionResult
over each OutputType in a later commit. This ensures the backoffs work
properly.
Update unit and bench tests to use CoinResult.
d2ed97656b wallet: Precompute Txdata after setting PSBT inputs' UTXOs (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
If we are given a PSBT that is missing one or more input UTXOs, our
PrecomputedTransactionData will be incorrect and missing information
that it should otherwise have, and therefore we may not produce a
signature when we should. To avoid this problem, we can do the
precomputation after we have set the UTXOs the wallet is able to set for
the PSBT.
Also adds a test for this behavior.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
reACK d2ed97656b
Sjors:
ACK d2ed97656b
aureleoules:
ACK d2ed97656b.
Tree-SHA512: 71beb6c7946096e82cfca83f36277302aa9e69d27b4f6d73d7d8f2f9f0ea1c0d653e846fa6aebee5e4763f56f950b4481240e953f6a2412caa84908d519171e1
817326a828 wallet: avoid rescans if under the snapshot (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the [assumeutxo project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11) (parent PR: #15606)
---
Refuse to load a wallet if it requires a rescan lower than the height of assumed-valid blocks.
Of course in live code right now, `BLOCK_ASSUMED_VALID` block index entries don't exist since they're a unique flag introduced by the use of UTXO snapshots, so this is prophylactic code exercised only by unittests.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 817326a828
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 817326a828. This seems like the simplest change we can make to avoid wallet problems when an assumeutxo snapshot is loaded.
Tree-SHA512: cfa44b2eb33d1818d30df45210d0dde1e9b78cc9b7c88cb985054dc28427bba9e0905debe4196065d1d3a5ce7bca7e605e629d5ce5f0225b25395746e6d3d596
Add new interfaces::BlockInfo struct to be able to pass extra block
information (file and undo information) to indexes which they are
updated to use high level interfaces::Chain notifications.
This commit does not change behavior in any way.
1be7964189 test, wallet: Add mempool rescan test for import RPCs (Fabian Jahr)
833ce76df7 rpc, wallet: Document mempool rescan after importdescriptor, importwallet (Fabian Jahr)
0e396d1ba7 rpc, wallet: Document mempool scan after importmulti (Fabian Jahr)
e6d3ef8586 rpc, wallet: Document mempool scan after importpubkey (Fabian Jahr)
6d3db52e66 rpc, wallet: Document and test mempool scan after importprivkey (João Barbosa)
3abdbbb90a rpc, wallet: Document and test mempool scan after importaddress (João Barbosa)
236239bd40 wallet: Rescan mempool for transactions as well (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
This PR picks up the work from #18964 and closes#18954.
It should incorporate all the unaddressed feedback from the PR:
- Mempool rescan now expanded to all relevant import* RPCs
- Added documentation in the help of each RPC
- More tests
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-utACK 1be7964189 (only a test change)
achow101:
ACK 1be7964189
w0xlt:
reACK 1be7964189
Tree-SHA512: b62fed5f97c6c242b2af417b41c9696a1f18878483d9e1c9429791f9c05257f57a00540a9a84df23c49faf6a61c3109c22972de81540083f38b506217804fcc5
When a transaction arrives, the wallet mark its inputs (prev-txs) as dirty.
Clearing the wallet transaction cache, triggering a balance recalculation.
If this does not happen due a db write error during `AddToWallet`, the wallet
will be in an invalid state: The transaction that spends certain wallet UTXO will
exist inside the in-memory wallet tx map, having the credit/debit calculated,
while its inputs will still have the old cached data (like if them were never
spent).
-Context:
If `AddToWallet` db write fails, the method returns a wtx nullptr without
removing the recently added transaction from the wallet's map.
-Problem:
When a db write error occurs, `AddToWalletIfInvolvingMe` return false even
when the tx is on the wallet's map already --> which makes `SyncTransaction`
skip the `MarkInputsDirty` call --> which leads to a wallet invalid state
where the inputs of this new transaction are not marked dirty, while the
transaction that spends them still exist on the in-memory wallet tx map.
Plus, as we only store arriving transaction inside `AddToWalletIfInvolvingMe`
when we synchronize/scan blocks from the chain and nowhere else, it makes sense
to treat the tx db write error as a runtime error to notify the user about the
problem. Otherwise, the user will lose all the not stored transactions after a
wallet shutdown (without be able to recover them automatically on the next
startup because the chain sync would be above the block where the txs arrived).
757216e31c wallet: don't iter twice when getting the cached debit/credit amount (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
A small optimization i stumbled upon while looking at something else. Figured it could be worth a PR.
Instead of calling GetCachableAmount twice, which will result in
iterating through all the transaction txins/txouts and calling
GetDebit/GetCredit (which lock cs_wallet), just merge the filters and do
it once.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 757216e31c
aureleoules:
ACK 757216e31c.
Tree-SHA512: 0dbbdd24231380196e929dce572752e6be1d69457252a7215e279e71d6199483b516f64019ae999a91dbce7fdd86f8bf0336b6e151cca93cbcf51bc854e838a2
fa277cd55d univalue: Throw exception on invalid pushes over silent ignore (MacroFake)
ccccc17b91 refactor: Default options in walletcreatefundedpsbt to VOBJ instead of VNULL (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
The return value of the `push*` helpers is never used, but important to determine if the operation was successful. One way to fix this would be to add the "nodiscard" attribute. However, this would make the code (and this diff) overly verbose for no reason.
So fix it by removing the never used return value. Also, fail verbosely in case of a programming mistake.
ACKs for top commit:
furszy:
code ACK fa277cd5
Tree-SHA512: ef212a5bf5ae6bbad20acc4dafa3715521e81544185988d1eab724f440e4864a27e686aff51d5bc51b3017892c2eb8e577bcb8f37e8ddbaa0d8833bb622f2f9c
UniValue does not have a constructor for enum values, however the
compiler will decay the enum into an int and select that constructor.
Avoid this compiler magic and clarify the code by explicitly selecting
the int-constructor.
This is needed for the next commit.
fa475e9c79 refactor: Return BResult from restoreWallet (MacroFake)
fa8de09edc Prepare BResult for non-copyable types (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
This avoids the `error` in-out param (and if `warnings` is added to `BResult`, it will avoid passing that in-out param as well).
Also, as it is needed for this change, prepare `BResult` for non-copyable types.
ACKs for top commit:
w0xlt:
reACK fa475e9c79
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa475e9c79. Changes since last review were replacing auto with explicit type and splitting commits
Tree-SHA512: 46350883572f13721ddd198f5dfb88d2fa58ebcbda416f74da3563ea15c920fb1e6ff30558526a4ac91c36c21e6afe27751a4e51b7b8bcbcbe805209f4e9014b
fa8a1c0696 rpc: Fix Univalue push_backV OOM in listtransactions (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
Related to, but not intended as a fix for #25229.
Currently the RPC will have the same data stored thrice:
* `UniValue ret` (memory filled by `ListTransactions`)
* `std::vector<UniValue> vec` (constructed by calling `push_backV`)
* `UniValue result` (the actual result, memory filled by `push_backV`)
Fix this by filling the memory only once:
* `std::vector<UniValue> ret` (memory filled by `ListTransactions`)
* Pass iterators to `push_backV` instead of creating a full copy
* Move memory into `UniValue result` instead of copying it
ACKs for top commit:
shaavan:
Code Review ACK fa8a1c0696
Tree-SHA512: 1c3ca40fc8497134a4141195160e4aa9fe72b3c00c5998c972b58ad0eb498ebea05013f9105bb80e7264c9db1d0e7a2032396a8a4af1f326d831fbee20f32ea3
111ea3ab71 wallet: refactor GetNewDestination, use BResult (furszy)
22351725bc send: refactor CreateTransaction flow to return a BResult<CTransactionRef> (furszy)
198fcca162 wallet: refactor, include 'FeeCalculation' inside 'CreatedTransactionResult' (furszy)
7a45c33d1f Introduce generic 'Result' class (furszy)
Pull request description:
Based on a common function signature pattern that we have all around the sources:
```cpp
bool doSomething(arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4, &result_obj, &error_string) {
// do something...
if (error) {
error_string = "something bad happened";
return false;
}
result = goodResult;
return true;
}
```
Introduced a generic class `BResult` that encapsulate the function boolean result, the result object (in case of having it) and, in case of failure, the string error reason.
Obtaining in this way cleaner function signatures and removing boilerplate code:
```cpp
BResult<Obj> doSomething(arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4) {
// do something...
if (error) return "something bad happened";
return goodResult;
}
```
Same cleanup applies equally to the function callers' side as well. There is no longer need to add the error string and the result object declarations before calling the function:
Before:
```cpp
Obj result_obj;
std::string error_string;
if (!doSomething(arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4, result_obj, error_string)) {
LogPrintf("Error: %s", error_string);
}
return result_obj;
```
Now:
```cpp
BResult<Obj> op_res = doSomething(arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4);
if (!op_res) {
LogPrintf("Error: %s", op_res.GetError());
}
return op_res.GetObjResult();
```
### Initial Implementation:
Have connected this new concept to two different flows for now:
1) The `CreateTransaction` flow. --> 7ba2b87c
2) The `GetNewDestination` flow. --> bcee0912
Happy note: even when introduced a new class into the sources, the amount of lines removed is almost equal to added ones :).
Extra note: this work is an extended version (and a decoupling) of the work that is inside #24845 (which does not contain the `GetNewDestination` changes nor the inclusion of the `FeeCalculation` field inside `CreatedTransactionResult`).
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 111ea3ab71
w0xlt:
reACK 111ea3ab71
theStack:
re-ACK 111ea3ab71
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 111ea3ab71🎏
Tree-SHA512: 6d84d901a4cb923727067f25ff64542a40edd1ea84fdeac092312ac684c34e3688a52ac5eb012717d2b73f4cb742b9d78e458eb0e9cb9d6d72a916395be91f69
230a2f4cc3 wallet test: Add unit test for wallet scan save_progress option (Ryan Ofsky)
a89ddfbe22 wallet: Save wallet scan progress (w0xlt)
Pull request description:
Currently, the wallet scan progress is not saved.
If it is interrupted, it will be necessary to start from scratch on the next load.
This PR changes this and the progress is saved right after checking a block.
Close https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25010
ACKs for top commit:
furszy:
re-ACK 230a2f4
achow101:
ACK 230a2f4cc3
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 230a2f4cc3. Only change since last review is tweaking whitespace and adding log print
Tree-SHA512: 1a9dec207ed22b3443fb06a4daf967637bc02bcaf71c070b7dc33605d0cab959551e4014c9e92293a63f54c5cbcc98bb9f8844a8c60bc32a1482b1c4130fab32
If we are given a PSBT that is missing one or more input UTXOs, our
PrecomputedTransactionData will be incorrect and missing information
that it should otherwise have, and therefore we may not produce a
signature when we should. To avoid this problem, we can do the
precomputation after we have set the UTXOs the wallet is able to set for
the PSBT.
Also adds a test for this behavior.
98ea43d5e9 test: add tests for negative waste during coin selection (ishaanam)
Pull request description:
#25495 mentions that waste can be negative when the current feerate is less than the long term feerate. There are currently no waste tests for negative waste, so this PR adds two of them.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 98ea43d5e9
glozow:
light code review ACK 98ea43d5e9, good to have tests for negative waste
Tree-SHA512: d194d370f1257975959d3c601fea9f82c30c1aabc3e8bedc997c62659283fe681cc527e59df1a0187b3c91e8067c60374dd5ce0237561bd882edafe6a575a9b9
d54c5c8b1b wallet: use CCoinControl to estimate signature size (S3RK)
a94659c84e wallet: replace GetTxSpendSize with CalculateMaximumSignedInputSize (S3RK)
Pull request description:
Currently `DummySignTx` and `DummySignInput` use different ways to determine signature size.
This PR unifies the way wallet estimates signature size for various inputs.
Instead of passing boolean flags from calling code the `use_max_sig` is now calculated at the place of signature creation using information available in `CCoinControl`
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK d54c5c8b1b
theStack:
Code-review ACK d54c5c8b1b
Tree-SHA512: e790903ad4683067070aa7dbf7434a1bd142282a5bc425112e64d88d27559f1a2cd60c68d6022feaf6b845237035cb18ece10f6243d719ba28173b69bd99110a
d69045e291 test: add coverage for 'listreceivedbyaddress' no change addrs return (furszy)
324f00a642 refactor: 'ListReceived' use optional for filtered address (furszy)
b459fc122f refactor: RPC 'ListReceived', encapsulate m_address_book access (furszy)
fa9f2ab8fd refactor: RPC 'listlabels', encapsulate 'CWallet::ListAddrBookLabels' functionality (furszy)
83e42c4b94 refactor: use 'ForEachAddrBookEntry' in RPC 'getaddressesbylabel' (furszy)
2b48642499 refactor: use ForEachAddrBookEntry in interfaces::getAddresses (furszy)
032842ae41 wallet: implement ForEachAddrBookEntry method (furszy)
09649bc95d refactor: implement general 'ListAddrBookAddresses' for addressbook destinations lookup (furszy)
192eb1e61c refactor: getAddress don't access m_address_book, use FindAddressEntry function (furszy)
Pull request description:
### Context
The wallet's `m_address_book` field is being accessed directly from several places across the sources.
### Problem
Code structure wise, we shouldn't be accessing it directly. It could end up being modified by mistake (from a place that has nothing to do with the wallet like an RPC command or the GUI) and cause a bigger issue: like an address book entry 'purpose' string change, which if done badly (from 'send' to 'receive'), could end up in a user sharing a "receive" address that he/she doesn't own.
### Solution
Encapsulate `m_address_book` access inside the wallet.
-------------------------------------------------------
Extra Note:
This is the initial step towards decoupling the address book functionality from the wallet's sources. In other words, the creation of the `AddressBookManager` (which will be coming in a follow-up PR).
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK d69045e291
theStack:
ACK d69045e291✅
w0xlt:
ACK d69045e291
Tree-SHA512: dba17acd86f171b4e9af0223bbbcad380048570f6a2f6a92732a51f01abe8806debaf65c9e9e5569fa76a541903cbb50adcb5f56ef77858151c698ae6b218e2a
140d942634 wallet: don't add change fee to target if subtracting fees from output (S3RK)
Pull request description:
Change fee is payed by the recipient, so we don't need to add it to our target for coin selection.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 140d942634
ishaanam:
ACK 140d942634
furszy:
Code review ACK 140d9426
Tree-SHA512: b5efd0264c47ecee9204a3fd039bad24c69f9e614c6e1d9bb240ee5be6356b175aa074f3be123e6cfb8becd4d7bd1028eebe18801662cc69d19413d8d5a9dd5c
Instead of calling GetCachableAmount twice, which will result in
iterating through all the transaction txins/txouts and calling
GetDebit/GetCredit (which lock cs_wallet), just merge the filters and do
it once.
