Commit graph

41251 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Martin Zumsande
fdae638e83 doc: Improve doc for functions involved in saving blocks to disk
In particular, document the flat file positions expected and
returned by functions better.

Co-authored-by: Ryan Ofsky <ryan@ofsky.org>
2024-05-14 13:49:34 -04:00
Matthew Zipkin
cbc6c440e3
doc: add comments and release-notes for JSON-RPC 2.0 2024-05-14 11:28:48 -04:00
Matthew Zipkin
e7ee80dcf2
rpc: JSON-RPC 2.0 should not respond to "notifications"
For JSON-RPC 2.0 requests we need to distinguish between
a missing "id" field and "id":null. This is accomplished
by making the JSONRPCRequest id property a
std::optional<UniValue> with a default value of
UniValue::VNULL.

A side-effect of this change for non-2.0 requests is that request which do not
specify an "id" field will no longer return "id": null in the response.
2024-05-14 11:28:43 -04:00
Ryan Ofsky
dbb3113082
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30083: kernel: Remove batchpriority from kernel library
d4b17c7d46 kernel: Remove batchpriority from kernel library (TheCharlatan)

Pull request description:

  The current usage of ScheduleBatchPriority is not transparent. Once the thread scheduling is changed, it remains unchanged for the remainder of the thread's lifetime. So move the call from `ImportBlocks` to the init code where it is clearer that its effect lasts for the entire lifetime of the thread.

  Users of the kernel library might not expect `ImportBlocks` to have an influence on the thread it is called in. Particularly since it is only a compile time option and cannot be controlled at runtime. With this patch users of the kernel library can now freely choose their own scheduling policy.

  This PR is easier reviewed with `git diff --color-moved-ws=ignore-all-space --color-moved=dimmed-zebra`

  ---
  This PR is part of the [libbitcoinkernel project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27587).

ACKs for top commit:
  maflcko:
    ACK d4b17c7d46 📭
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK d4b17c7d46, just added suggested comment since last review
  hebasto:
    ACK d4b17c7d46, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK.

Tree-SHA512: cafedecd9affad58ddd7f30f68bba71291ca951bb186ff4b2da04b7f21f0b26e5e3143846d032b9e391bd5ce6c7466b97aa3758d2a85ebd7353eb8b69139641a
2024-05-14 11:20:33 -04:00
Matthew Zipkin
bf1a1f1662
rpc: Avoid returning HTTP errors for JSON-RPC 2.0 requests
Avoid returning HTTP status errors for non-batch JSON-RPC 2.0 requests if the
RPC method failed but the HTTP request was otherwise valid. Batch requests
already did not return HTTP errors previously.
2024-05-14 11:15:54 -04:00
Matthew Zipkin
466b90562f
rpc: Add "jsonrpc" field and drop null "result"/"error" fields
Only for JSON-RPC 2.0 requests.
2024-05-14 10:39:43 -04:00
Matthew Zipkin
2ca1460ae3
rpc: identify JSON-RPC 2.0 requests 2024-05-14 10:32:43 -04:00
Greg Sanders
9365baa489 test: add conflicting topology test case
We want to ensure that even if topologies
that are acceptable are relaxed, like
removing package-not-child-with-unconfirmed-parents,
that we don't end up accepting packages we shouldn't.
2024-05-14 08:36:31 -04:00
josibake
9408a04e42
tests, fuzz: use new NUMS_H const 2024-05-14 11:44:33 +02:00
glozow
0fb17bf61a [log] updates in TxOrphanage
- Add elapsed time in "remove orphan" log
- Add size in "stored orphan" log
- grammar edit
2024-05-14 10:38:57 +01:00
glozow
b16da7eda7 [functional test] attackers sending mutated orphans 2024-05-14 10:38:57 +01:00
glozow
6675f6428d [unit test] TxOrphanage handling of same-txid-different-witness txns 2024-05-14 10:32:28 +01:00
glozow
8923edfc1f [p2p] allow entries with the same txid in TxOrphanage
Index by wtxid instead of txid to allow entries with the same txid but
different witnesses in orphanage. This prevents an attacker from
blocking a transaction from entering the orphanage by sending a mutated
version of it.
2024-05-14 10:32:28 +01:00
glozow
c31f148166 [refactor] TxOrphanage::EraseTx by wtxid
No behavior change right now, as transactions in the orphanage are
unique by txid. This makes the next commit easier to review.
2024-05-14 10:32:28 +01:00
glozow
efcc593017 [refactor] TxOrphanage::HaveTx only by wtxid 2024-05-14 10:32:27 +01:00
glozow
7e475b9648 [p2p] don't query orphanage by txid 2024-05-14 10:31:56 +01:00
TheCharlatan
d4b17c7d46
kernel: Remove batchpriority from kernel library
The current usage of ScheduleBatchPriority is not transparent. Once the
thread scheduling is changed, it remains unchanged for the remainder of
the thread's lifetime. So move the call from `ImportBlocks` to the init
code where it is clearer that its effect lasts for the entire lifetime
of the thread.

Users of the kernel library might not expect `ImportBlocks` to have an
influence on the thread it is called in. Particularly since it is only a
compile time option and cannot be controlled at runtime. With this patch
users of the kernel library can now choose their own scheduling policy.
2024-05-14 10:26:28 +02:00
josibake
b946f8a4c5
crypto: add NUMS_H const 2024-05-14 10:24:31 +02:00
merge-script
7fcf4e9979
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30078: depends: set AR & RANLIB for CMake
019ad7327c depends: set RANLIB for CMake (fanquake)
43cfb428cb depends: set NM for CMake (fanquake)
1e4412b317 depends: set AR for CMake (fanquake)

Pull request description:

  Needed for #21778. Should be more correct in any case.

ACKs for top commit:
  theuni:
    utACK 019ad7327c. I didn't test, but I tried this approach on a few deps and it seemed to work as expected.
  TheCharlatan:
    ACK 019ad7327c

Tree-SHA512: 78cc8981456f7476cafca0e40fcc569e474b92004c8024d1c4268b6aab53175074a06ab17ebded8d706bf0a7f77401642dd38bb7ce2e4b04abdcd149d3d69969
2024-05-14 11:47:09 +08:00
Ava Chow
ecba230979 wallet: implement BerkeleyRODatabase::Backup 2024-05-13 23:01:38 -04:00
Ava Chow
0c8e728476 wallet: implement BerkeleyROBatch
Implement ReadKey and HasKey of BerkeleyROBatch, and Next of BerkeleyROCursor.
Also adds the containers for records to BerkeleyRODatabase so that
BerkeleyROBatch will be able to access the records.
2024-05-13 23:01:37 -04:00
Ava Chow
756ff9b478 wallet: add dummy BerkeleyRODatabase and BerkeleyROBatch classes
BerkeleyRODatabase and BerkeleyROBatch will be used to access a BDB file
without the use of BDB. For now, these are dummy classes.
2024-05-13 23:01:06 -04:00
Sebastian Falbesoner
12d82817bf refactor: simplify FormatSubVersion using strprintf/Join
Rather than using std::ostringstream and manually joining the
comments, use strprintf and our own `Join` helper.
2024-05-13 23:31:46 +02:00
Ava Chow
d6069cb8d6
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#28233: validation: don't clear cache on periodic flush: >2x block connection speed
4a6d1d1e3b validation: don't clear cache on periodic flush (Andrew Toth)

Pull request description:

  Since https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17487 we no longer need to clear the coins cache when syncing to disk. A warm coins cache significantly speeds up block connection, and only needs to be fully flushed when nearing the `dbcache` limit.

  Periodic flushes occur every 24 hours, which empties the cache and causes block connection to slow down. By keeping the cache through periodic flushes a node can run for several days with an increasingly hotter cache and connect blocks much more quickly. Now not only can setting a higher `dbcache` value be beneficial for IBD, it can also be beneficial for connecting blocks faster.

  To benchmark in real world usage, I spun up 6 identical `t2.small` AWS EC2 instances, all running in the same region in the same VPC. I configured 2 instances to run master, 2 instances to run the change in this PR, and 2 instances to run the change in this PR but with `dbcache=1000`. All instances had `prune=5000` and a 20 GB `gp2` `EBS` volume. A 7th EC2 instance in the same VPC ran master and connected only to some trusted nodes in the outside network. Each of the 6 nodes under test only connected directly to this 7th instance. I manually pruned as much as possible and uploaded the same `blocks`, `chainstate` and `mempool.dat` to all instances. I started all 6 peers simultaneously at block height `835245` and ran them for over a week until block `836534`.

  The results were much faster block connection times for this branch compared to master, and much faster for this branch with `dbcache=1000` compared to default `dbcache`.

  |  branch |speed |
  |-----------:|----------:|
  | master 1 | 1995.49ms/blk |
  | master 2 | 2129.78ms/blk |
  | branch default dbcache 1 | 1189.65ms/blk |
  | branch default dbcache 2 | 1037.74ms/blk |
  | branch dbcache=1000 1 | 393.69ms/blk |
  | branch dbcache=1000 2 | 427.77ms/blk |

  The log files of all 6 instances are [here](https://gist.github.com/andrewtoth/03c95033e7581d5dbc5be028639a1a91).
  There is a lot of noise with the exact times of blocks being connected, so I plotted the rolling 20 block connect time averages. The large dots are the times where the cache is emptied. For the red master nodes, this happens every 24 hours. The blue branch nodes with default `dbcache` only filled up and emptied the caches once, which is seen in the middle. The green branch nodes with 1000 `dbcache` never emptied the cache. It is very clear from the chart that whenever the cache is emptied, connect block speed degrades significantly.

  ![plot](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/assets/237213/802cb28d-1ad4-47c3-a886-c5366b423eca)

  Also note that this still clears the cache for pruning flushes. Having frequent pruning flushes with a large cache that doesn't clear is less performant than the status quo https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15265#issuecomment-458657451. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28280.

ACKs for top commit:
  sipa:
    utACK 4a6d1d1e3b
  achow101:
    ACK 4a6d1d1e3b
  brunoerg:
    crACK 4a6d1d1e3b

Tree-SHA512: 05dbc677bc309bbcf89c52a6c5e853e2816b0ef0b5ee3719b30696df315a0427e244bb82da9ad828ec0e7ea8764552f8affe14c0184b52adf1909f5d8c1b4f9e
2024-05-13 16:31:19 -04:00
Ryan Ofsky
0503cbea9a
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30094: rpc: move UniValue in blockToJSON
b77bad309e rpc: move UniValue in blockToJSON (willcl-ark)

Pull request description:

  Fixes: #24542
  Fixes: #30052

  Without explicitly declaring the move, these `UniValues` get copied, causing increased memory usage. Fix this by explicitly moving the `UniValue` objects.

  Used by `rest_block` and `getblock` RPC.

ACKs for top commit:
  maflcko:
    review ACK b77bad309e
  ismaelsadeeq:
    ACK b77bad309e
  TheCharlatan:
    ACK b77bad309e
  theuni:
    utACK b77bad309e
  hebasto:
    ACK b77bad309e, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK.
  BrandonOdiwuor:
    ACK b77bad309e

Tree-SHA512: 767608331040f9cfe5c3568ed0e3c338920633472a1a50d4bbb47d1dc69d2bb11466d611f050ac8ad1a894b47fe1ea4d968cf34cbd44d4bb8d479fc5c7475f6d
2024-05-13 16:15:53 -04:00
glozow
ff8c606cf1
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29974: fuzz: txorphan tests fixups
58594c7040 fuzz: txorphan tests fixups (Sergi Delgado Segura)

Pull request description:

  Motivated by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28970#discussion_r1576401327

  Adds the following fixups in txorphan fuzz tests:

  - Don't bond the output count of the created orphans to the number of available coins
  - Allow duplicate inputs but don't store duplicate outpoints

  Most significantly, this gets rid of the `duplicate_input` flag altogether, making the test easier to reason about. Notice how, under normal conditions, duplicate inputs would be caught by `MemPoolAccept::PreChecks`, however, no validations checks are run on the test before adding data to the orphanage (neither were they before this patch)

  ## Rationale

  The way the test is currently written, duplicate inputs are allowed based on a random flag (`duplicate_input`). If the flag is unset, upon selecting an outpoint as input for a new transaction, the input is popped to prevent re-selection and later re-added to the collection (once all inputs have been picked). However, the re-addition to the collection is performed independently of whether the flag was set or not. This means that, if the flag is set, the selected inputs are duplicated which in turn makes these inputs more likely to be re-picked in the following iteration of the loop.

  Additionally, both the input and output count of the transaction are bonded to the number of available outpoints. This makes sense for the former, but the latter shouldn't be.

ACKs for top commit:
  maflcko:
    utACK 58594c7040
  glozow:
    ACK 58594c7
  instagibbs:
    ACK 58594c7040

Tree-SHA512: e97cc2a43e388f87b64d2e4e45f929dd5b0dd85d668dd693b75e4c9ceea734cd7645952385d428208d07b70e1aafbec84cc2ec264a2e07d36fc8ba3e97885a8d
2024-05-13 16:00:49 +01:00
glozow
c7deb76118
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29994: doc: removed help text saying that peers may not connect automatically
95897ff181 doc: removed help text saying that peers may not connect automatically (kevkevin)

Pull request description:

  Introduced in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23542 and released in version 23.0 there has been significant time since this change (2 years).

  This should be removed as it is no longer relevant

ACKs for top commit:
  stickies-v:
    ACK 95897ff181
  tdb3:
    ACK for 95897ff181.
  vasild:
    ACK 95897ff181
  jonatack:
    ACK 95897ff181
  kristapsk:
    ACK 95897ff181. According to https://bitnodes.io/dashboard/#user-agents stats, most nodes on the network are v23+.

Tree-SHA512: 9e35194f8a1e06f1447450af2ea30cdc43722665c2d2e4b7aa9a52afac5c1e83fed744742c836743a555cc180c90f9eebdc6637eba6190010d693eef9c5834f7
2024-05-13 15:58:36 +01:00
willcl-ark
b77bad309e
rpc: move UniValue in blockToJSON
Without explicitly declaring the move, these UniValues get copied,
causing increased memory usage. Fix this by explicitly moving the
UniValue objects.

Used by `rest_block` and `getblock` RPC.
2024-05-13 14:30:44 +01:00
fanquake
019ad7327c
depends: set RANLIB for CMake 2024-05-13 20:01:45 +08:00
fanquake
43cfb428cb
depends: set NM for CMake 2024-05-13 20:01:37 +08:00
fanquake
1e4412b317
depends: set AR for CMake 2024-05-13 20:01:06 +08:00
josibake
5676aec1e1
refactor: Model the bech32 charlimit as an Enum
Bech32(m) was defined with a 90 character limit so that certain
guarantees for error detection could be made for segwit addresses.
However, there is nothing about the encoding scheme itself that requires
a limit and in practice bech32(m) has been used without the 90 char
limit (e.g. lightning invoices).

Further, increasing the character limit doesn't do away with error
detection, it simply lessons the guarantees.

Model charlimit as an Enum, so that if a different address scheme is
using bech32(m), the character limit for that address scheme can be
used, rather than always using the 90 charlimit defined for segwit
addresses.

upate comment
2024-05-13 12:07:47 +02:00
merge-script
b94061902e
Merge bitcoin-core/gui#812: Fix create unsigned transaction fee bump
671b7a3251 gui: fix create unsigned transaction fee bump (furszy)

Pull request description:

  Fixes #810.

  Not much to explain; we were requiring the wallet to be unlocked for the unsigned transaction creation process.
  Fix this by moving the unlock wallet request to the signed transaction creation process.

ACKs for top commit:
  pablomartin4btc:
    tACK 671b7a3251
  hebasto:
    ACK 671b7a3251, tested on Ubuntu 24.04.

Tree-SHA512: 5b9ec5a1b91c014c05c83c63daaa8ba33f9dc1bfa930442315a0913db710df17a1b6bb4ad39f1419a7054f37ebedb7ad52e1c5d3d2fb444b1676162e89a4efd2
2024-05-12 15:30:34 +01:00
merge-script
ee9491369f
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29658: Bugfix: GUI: Help messages already have a trailing newline, so don't add an extra one
d1ed09a764 Bugfix: GUI: Help messages already have a trailing newline, so don't add an extra one (Luke Dashjr)

Pull request description:

  Reviewing #29585, I noticed that `bitcoin-qt` adds an extra newline for `-help` and `-version` beyond the other binaries'.

ACKs for top commit:
  hebasto:
    ACK d1ed09a764, tested on Ubuntu 24.04.

Tree-SHA512: 15ee9d1060c2492bb3b04a0ac4cb53f7b959bbe32bce415793da0c221f1c963c8f2bb3996ea07d1a7c192bfc2e23be2cd7d4e5649c592eb3fc03906c2763f1aa
2024-05-12 14:21:21 +01:00
merge-script
3207286680
Merge bitcoin-core/gui#813: Don't permit port in proxy IP option
10c5275ba4 gui: don't permit port in proxy IP option (willcl-ark)

Pull request description:

  Fixes: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/issues/809

  Previously it was possible through the GUI to enter an IP address:port into the "Proxy IP" configuration box. After the node was restarted the errant setting would prevent the node starting back up until manually removed from settings.json.

  Prevent this with a simple check for ":" in the string. This is acceptable here in the GUI setting because we already fail on a hostname such as "http://x.x.x.x", so it won't cause false positives.

ACKs for top commit:
  furszy:
    utACK 10c5275ba4
  hebasto:
    ACK 10c5275ba4, tested on Ubuntu 24.04.

Tree-SHA512: ed83590630cf693680a3221f701ecd18dd08710a17b726dc4978a3a6e330a34fb77d73a4f710c01bcb3faf88b6604ff37bcdbb191ce1623348ca5b92fd6fe9a7
2024-05-11 19:34:12 +01:00
merge-script
182983c6ab
Merge bitcoin-core/gui#788: debugwindow: update session ID tooltip
3bf00e1360 gui: debugwindow: update session ID tooltip (Marnix)

Pull request description:

  When you have a v2 connection, there is always a session ID.

  the _if any_ is a leftover from https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/754, where the session ID property initially would always be displayed (transport v1 and v2).
  So the session ID could be empty when you have a v1 connection.

  As now the _Session ID_ property only is displayed for v2 connection, there will always be a session ID.

  master

  ![sessionIDifany](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/assets/93143998/d4d7df43-8281-4b1e-83fc-5a3788d7724e)

  PR

  ![sessionID](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/assets/93143998/221f6831-7d12-4913-be76-325a87baad2e)

  Session ID not shown when transport v1

  ![transportv1](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/assets/93143998/6c067a08-4be4-4ce1-b514-80654ca5cd43)

  <!--
  *** Please remove the following help text before submitting: ***

  Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
  immediately.

  GUI-related pull requests should be opened against
  https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui
  first. See CONTRIBUTING.md
  -->

  <!--
  Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it improves
  Bitcoin Core user experience or Bitcoin Core developer experience
  significantly:

  * Any test improvements or new tests that improve coverage are always welcome.
  * All other changes should have accompanying unit tests (see `src/test/`) or
    functional tests (see `test/`). Contributors should note which tests cover
    modified code. If no tests exist for a region of modified code, new tests
    should accompany the change.
  * Bug fixes are most welcome when they come with steps to reproduce or an
    explanation of the potential issue as well as reasoning for the way the bug
    was fixed.
  * Features are welcome, but might be rejected due to design or scope issues.
    If a feature is based on a lot of dependencies, contributors should first
    consider building the system outside of Bitcoin Core, if possible.
  * Refactoring changes are only accepted if they are required for a feature or
    bug fix or otherwise improve developer experience significantly. For example,
    most "code style" refactoring changes require a thorough explanation why they
    are useful, what downsides they have and why they *significantly* improve
    developer experience or avoid serious programming bugs. Note that code style
    is often a subjective matter. Unless they are explicitly mentioned to be
    preferred in the [developer notes](/doc/developer-notes.md), stylistic code
    changes are usually rejected.
  -->

  <!--
  Bitcoin Core has a thorough review process and even the most trivial change
  needs to pass a lot of eyes and requires non-zero or even substantial time
  effort to review. There is a huge lack of active reviewers on the project, so
  patches often sit for a long time.
  -->

ACKs for top commit:
  vostrnad:
    ACK 3bf00e1360
  kristapsk:
    ACK 3bf00e1360
  jarolrod:
    ACK 3bf00e1360
  pablomartin4btc:
    tACK 3bf00e1360
  hebasto:
    ACK 3bf00e1360.

Tree-SHA512: 4de0c56c070dc5d1cee73b629bdf3d1778c6d90d512337aa6cfd3eed4ce95cbcfbe5713e2942f6fc22907b2c4d9df7979ba8e9f91f7cc173b42699ea35113f96
2024-05-11 19:13:34 +01:00
merge-script
b47c393d8a
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30081: refactor: Remove unused code from subprocess.h header
5a11d3023f refactor, subprocess: Remove unused stream API calls (Hennadii Stepanov)
05b6f8793c refactor, subprocess: Remove unused `Popen::child_created_` data member (Hennadii Stepanov)
9e1ccf55e1 refactor, subprocess: Remove unused `Popen::poll()` (Hennadii Stepanov)
24b53fc84a refactor, subprocess: Remove `Popen::pid()` (Hennadii Stepanov)

Pull request description:

  This PR continues https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29961.

  Please note that `Popen::poll()` is not required for https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29868 anymore.

ACKs for top commit:
  theuni:
    Easy code review ACK 5a11d3023f since it's all removals :)
  theStack:
    Code-review ACK 5a11d3023f

Tree-SHA512: 11f984f8384c337782d058afa80011e88087a1b5a3ed6e4678d492e6c232b706a26312463c5dd8c529aa477497c8afca9f54574e0e36e3edd5675bd5d8424bbb
2024-05-11 18:37:49 +08:00
merge-script
4d3f1d08db
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29739: build: swap cctools otool for llvm-objdump
7f5ac4520d build: swap otool for (llvm-)objdump (fanquake)

Pull request description:

  This tool is used in GUI packaging on macOS, and also somewhat of a blocker for #21778. The main issue is that some distros don't really ship this tool in a standard ways, i.e Ubuntu only ships `llvm-otool` with a version suffix, i.e `llvm-otool-17`, which makes it hard to find and use. Rather than trying to deal with that mess, switch to using the equivalent LLVM tool (objdump), which is a drop-in replacement.

ACKs for top commit:
  TheCharlatan:
    ACK 7f5ac4520d
  theuni:
    ACK 7f5ac4520d. Tested `make deploy` on native macOS. Looks good.
  hebasto:
    ACK 7f5ac4520d.

Tree-SHA512: ac978043f14fb448010542a4a7ce8c6c74b4cbd90f83b4cb4d0bff55974010f10a70b5354f65b239a8bd961d7a3aca22ca165b42954ca87879b9e0524db5f879
2024-05-11 18:34:42 +08:00
Jon Atack
d0b047494c test: add GetAddedNodeInfo() CJDNS regression unit test 2024-05-10 22:29:51 -06:00
Jon Atack
684da97070 p2p, bugfix: detect addnode cjdns peers in GetAddedNodeInfo()
Addnode (manual) peers connected to us via the cjdns network are currently not
detected by CConnman::GetAddedNodeInfo(), i.e. fConnected is always false.

This causes the following issues:

- RPC `getaddednodeinfo` incorrectly shows them as not connected

- CConnman::ThreadOpenAddedConnections() continually retries to connect them
2024-05-10 22:29:51 -06:00
Ava Chow
2cedb42a92
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29252: kernel: Remove key module from kernel library
96378fe734 Refactor: Remove ECC_Start and ECC_Stop from key header (TheCharlatan)
41eba5bd71 kernel: Remove key module from kernel library (TheCharlatan)
a08d2b3cb9 tools: Use ECC_Context helper in bitcoin-tx and bitcoin-wallet tools (Ryan Ofsky)
28905c1a64 test: Use ECC_Context helper in bench and fuzz tests (Ryan Ofsky)
538fedde1d common: Add ECC_Context RAII wrapper for ECC_Start/ECC_Stop (Ryan Ofsky)

Pull request description:

  The key module's functionality is not used by the kernel library, but currently kernel users are still required to initialize the key module's `secp256k1_context_sign` global as part of the `kernel::Context` through `ECC_Start`. So move the `ECC_Start` call to the `NodeContext` ctor instead to completely remove the key module from the kernel library.

  The gui tests currently keep multiple `NodeContext` objects in memory, so call `ECC_Stop` manually to avoid triggering an assertion on `ECC_Start`.

  ---

  This PR is part of the [libbitcoinkernel project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27587). It removes a module from the kernel library.

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    ACK 96378fe734
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK 96378fe734. Just suggested comment changes since last review.
  theuni:
    utACK 96378fe734

Tree-SHA512: 40be427e8e2c920c0e3ce64a9bdd90551be27a89af11440bfb6ab0dd3a1d1ccb7cf1f82383cd782818cd1bb44d5ae5d2161cf4d78d3127ce4987342007090bab
2024-05-10 13:18:00 -04:00
Ava Chow
7066980273
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29948: test: add missing comparison of node1's mempool in MempoolPackagesTest
e912717ff6 test: add missing comparison of node1's mempool in MempoolPackagesTest (umiumi)

Pull request description:

  #29941 Recreated a pull request because there was a conflict. Trying to resolve the conflict but the old one automatically closed.

  Add missing comparison for TODO comments in `mempool_packages.py`

  Also, notice that the ancestor size limits and descendant size limits actually implemented in #21800   ,  so I removed the todo for those two size limits.

ACKs for top commit:
  kevkevinpal:
    ACK [e912717](e912717ff6)
  achow101:
    ACK e912717ff6
  alfonsoromanz:
    Tested ACK e912717ff6. The code looks good to me and the test execution is successful.
  rkrux:
    tACK [e912717](e912717ff6)

Tree-SHA512: 8cb51746b0547369344c9ceef59599bfe9c91d424687af5e24dc6641f9e99fb433515d79c724e71fd3d5e02994f0cef623d3674367b8296b05c3c6fcdde282ef
2024-05-10 12:44:42 -04:00
Hennadii Stepanov
5a11d3023f
refactor, subprocess: Remove unused stream API calls 2024-05-10 14:58:27 +01:00
Hennadii Stepanov
05b6f8793c
refactor, subprocess: Remove unused Popen::child_created_ data member 2024-05-10 14:47:15 +01:00
Hennadii Stepanov
9e1ccf55e1
refactor, subprocess: Remove unused Popen::poll() 2024-05-10 14:47:07 +01:00
Hennadii Stepanov
24b53fc84a
refactor, subprocess: Remove Popen::pid() 2024-05-10 14:42:31 +01:00
Ava Chow
98dd4e712e
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30006: test: use sleepy wait-for-log in reindex readonly
fd6a7d3a13 test: use sleepy wait-for-log in reindex readonly (Matthew Zipkin)

Pull request description:

  Also rename the busy wait-for-log method to prevent recurrence. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27039#discussion_r1532578152

ACKs for top commit:
  maflcko:
    utACK fd6a7d3a13
  achow101:
    ACK fd6a7d3a13
  tdb3:
    ACK for fd6a7d3a13
  rkrux:
    ACK [fd6a7d3](fd6a7d3a13)

Tree-SHA512: 7ff0574833df1ec843159b35ee88b8bb345a513ac13ed0b72abd1bf330c454a3f9df4d927871b9e3d37bfcc07542b06ef63acef8e822cd18499adae8cbb0cda8
2024-05-09 18:31:03 -04:00
Ava Chow
24572cf768
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29939: test: add MiniWallet tagging support to avoid UTXO mixing, use in fill_mempool
dd8fa86193 test: use tagged ephemeral MiniWallet instance in fill_mempool (Sebastian Falbesoner)
b2037ad4ae test: add MiniWallet tagging support to avoid UTXO mixing (Sebastian Falbesoner)
c8e6d08236 test: refactor: eliminate COINBASE_MATURITY magic number in fill_mempool (Sebastian Falbesoner)
4f347140b1 test: refactor: move fill_mempool to new module mempool_util (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  Different MiniWallet instances using the same mode (either ADDRESS_OP_TRUE, RAW_OP_TRUE or RAW_P2PK) currently always create and spend UTXOs with identical output scripts, which can cause unintentional tx dependencies (see e.g. the discussion in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29827#discussion_r1565443465). In order to avoid mixing of UTXOs between instances, this PR introduces the possibility to provide a MiniWallet tag name, that is used to derive a different internal key for the taproot construction, leading to a different P2TR output script. Note that since we use script-path spending and only the key-path is changed here, no changes in the MiniWallet spending logic are needed.

  The new tagging option is then used in the `fill_mempool` helper to create an ephemeral wallet for the filling txs, as suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29827#discussion_r1565964264. To avoid circular dependencies, `fill_mempool` is moved to a new module `mempool_util.py` first.

  I'm still not sure if a generic word like "tag" is the right term for what this tries to achieve, happy to pick up better suggestions. Also, maybe passing a tag name is overkill and a boolean flag like "random_output_script" is sufficient?

ACKs for top commit:
  glozow:
    ACK dd8fa86193
  achow101:
    ACK dd8fa86193
  rkrux:
    tACK [dd8fa86](dd8fa86193)
  brunoerg:
    utACK dd8fa86193

Tree-SHA512: 5ef3558c3ef5ac32cfa79c8f751972ca6bceaa332cd7daac7e93412a88e30dec472cb041c0845b04abf8a317036d31ebddfc3234e609ed442417894c2bdeeac9
2024-05-09 16:54:18 -04:00
Ava Chow
012e540ace
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29122: test: adds outbound eviction functional tests, updates comment in ConsiderEviction
d53d848347 test: adds outbound eviction tests for non outbound-full-relay peers (Sergi Delgado Segura)
a8d9a0edc7 test: adds outbound eviction functional tests, updates comment in ConsiderEviction (Sergi Delgado Segura)

Pull request description:

  ## Motivation

  While checking the outbound eviction code I realized a case was not considered within the comments, which in turn made me realize we had no functional tests for the outbound eviction case (when I went to check/add the test case).

  This PR updates the aforementioned comment and adds functional tests to cover the outbound eviction logic, in addition to the existing unit tests found at `src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp`.

ACKs for top commit:
  davidgumberg:
    reACK d53d848347
  tdb3:
    Re ACK for d53d848347
  achow101:
    ACK d53d848347
  cbergqvist:
    ACK d53d848347

Tree-SHA512: 633b84bb1229fe21e2f650c1beada33ca7f190b64eafd64df2266516d21175e5d652e019ff7114f00cb8bd19f5817dc19e65adf75767a88e24dc0842ce40c63e
2024-05-09 16:20:43 -04:00
ishaanam
71aae72e1f test: test sendall does ancestor aware funding 2024-05-09 12:49:41 -04:00