phantom/bitcoin
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git synced 2025-01-26 11:13:23 -03:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
Bitcoin Core mirror and no, I don't give a fuck about Monero.
40948 commits 6 branches 321 tags 2.2 GiB
C++ 56.4%
C 22.8%
Python 17.5%
CMake 1%
Shell 0.8%
Other 1.2%
Find a file
Ava Chow 24572cf768
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29939: test: add MiniWallet tagging support to avoid UTXO mixing, use in fill_mempool 
dd8fa86193 test: use tagged ephemeral MiniWallet instance in fill_mempool (Sebastian Falbesoner)
b2037ad4ae test: add MiniWallet tagging support to avoid UTXO mixing (Sebastian Falbesoner)
c8e6d08236 test: refactor: eliminate COINBASE_MATURITY magic number in fill_mempool (Sebastian Falbesoner)
4f347140b1 test: refactor: move fill_mempool to new module mempool_util (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  Different MiniWallet instances using the same mode (either ADDRESS_OP_TRUE, RAW_OP_TRUE or RAW_P2PK) currently always create and spend UTXOs with identical output scripts, which can cause unintentional tx dependencies (see e.g. the discussion in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29827#discussion_r1565443465). In order to avoid mixing of UTXOs between instances, this PR introduces the possibility to provide a MiniWallet tag name, that is used to derive a different internal key for the taproot construction, leading to a different P2TR output script. Note that since we use script-path spending and only the key-path is changed here, no changes in the MiniWallet spending logic are needed.

  The new tagging option is then used in the `fill_mempool` helper to create an ephemeral wallet for the filling txs, as suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29827#discussion_r1565964264. To avoid circular dependencies, `fill_mempool` is moved to a new module `mempool_util.py` first.

  I'm still not sure if a generic word like "tag" is the right term for what this tries to achieve, happy to pick up better suggestions. Also, maybe passing a tag name is overkill and a boolean flag like "random_output_script" is sufficient?

ACKs for top commit:
  glozow:
    ACK dd8fa86193
  achow101:
    ACK dd8fa86193
  rkrux:
    tACK [dd8fa86](dd8fa86193)
  brunoerg:
    utACK dd8fa86193

Tree-SHA512: 5ef3558c3ef5ac32cfa79c8f751972ca6bceaa332cd7daac7e93412a88e30dec472cb041c0845b04abf8a317036d31ebddfc3234e609ed442417894c2bdeeac9
2024-05-09 16:54:18 -04:00
.github ci, msvc: Add "Run fuzz binaries" step 2024-04-18 10:27:55 +01:00
.tx qt: Bump Transifex slug for 27.x 2024-02-07 09:24:32 +00:00
build-aux/m4 Add lint check for bitcoin-config.h include IWYU pragma 2024-05-01 08:33:43 +02:00
build_msvc Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29494: build: Assume HAVE_CONFIG_H, Add IWYU pragma keep to bitcoin-config.h includes 2024-05-07 14:14:03 -04:00
ci ci: Exclude feature_init for now in valgrind task 2024-05-07 08:53:18 +02:00
contrib Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#28793: contrib: Add asmap-tool 2024-05-09 11:57:30 -04:00
depends Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29960: depends: pass verbose through to cmake based makefiles 2024-05-06 09:47:29 +08:00
doc Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30025: doc: fix broken relative md links 2024-05-08 11:54:46 +08:00
share contrib: rpcauth.py - Add new option (-j/--json) to output text in json format 2024-04-25 08:32:28 -05:00
src Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29122: test: adds outbound eviction functional tests, updates comment in ConsiderEviction 2024-05-09 16:20:43 -04:00
test Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29939: test: add MiniWallet tagging support to avoid UTXO mixing, use in fill_mempool 2024-05-09 16:54:18 -04:00
.cirrus.yml ci: Skip git install if it is already installed 2024-02-16 16:06:45 +01:00
.editorconfig ci: Drop AppVeyor CI integration 2021-09-07 06:12:53 +03:00
.gitattributes Separate protocol versioning from clientversion 2014-10-29 00:24:40 -04:00
.gitignore Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29733: build, macos: Drop unused osx_volname target 2024-04-02 14:57:22 +01:00
.python-version Bump .python-version from 3.9.17 to 3.9.18 2023-10-24 18:51:24 +02:00
.style.yapf Update .style.yapf 2023-06-01 23:35:10 +05:30
autogen.sh build: make sure we can overwrite config.{guess,sub} 2023-06-13 14:58:43 +02:00
configure.ac build: no-longer disable WARN_CXXFLAGS when CXXFLAGS is set 2024-05-03 15:31:54 +08:00
CONTRIBUTING.md Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29645: doc: update release-process.md 2024-04-30 20:17:04 -04:00
COPYING doc: upgrade Bitcoin Core license to 2024 2024-01-10 16:29:01 -06:00
INSTALL.md doc: Added hyperlink for doc/build 2021-09-09 19:53:12 +05:30
Makefile.am build, test: Remove unused TIMEOUT environment variable 2024-05-08 14:31:16 +01:00
README.md doc: Explain Bitcoin Core in README.md 2022-05-10 07:49:09 +02:00
SECURITY.md Update security.md contact for achow101 2023-12-14 18:14:54 -05:00

README.md

Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree

https://bitcoincore.org

For an immediately usable, binary version of the Bitcoin Core software, see https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/.

What is Bitcoin Core?

Bitcoin Core connects to the Bitcoin peer-to-peer network to download and fully validate blocks and transactions. It also includes a wallet and graphical user interface, which can be optionally built.

Further information about Bitcoin Core is available in the doc folder.

License

Bitcoin Core is released under the terms of the MIT license. See COPYING for more information or see https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT.

Development Process

The master branch is regularly built (see doc/build-*.md for instructions) and tested, but it is not guaranteed to be completely stable. Tags are created regularly from release branches to indicate new official, stable release versions of Bitcoin Core.

The https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui repository is used exclusively for the development of the GUI. Its master branch is identical in all monotree repositories. Release branches and tags do not exist, so please do not fork that repository unless it is for development reasons.

The contribution workflow is described in CONTRIBUTING.md and useful hints for developers can be found in doc/developer-notes.md.

Testing

Testing and code review is the bottleneck for development; we get more pull requests than we can review and test on short notice. Please be patient and help out by testing other people's pull requests, and remember this is a security-critical project where any mistake might cost people lots of money.

Automated Testing

Developers are strongly encouraged to write unit tests for new code, and to submit new unit tests for old code. Unit tests can be compiled and run (assuming they weren't disabled in configure) with: make check. Further details on running and extending unit tests can be found in /src/test/README.md.

There are also regression and integration tests, written in Python. These tests can be run (if the test dependencies are installed) with: test/functional/test_runner.py

The CI (Continuous Integration) systems make sure that every pull request is built for Windows, Linux, and macOS, and that unit/sanity tests are run automatically.

Manual Quality Assurance (QA) Testing

Changes should be tested by somebody other than the developer who wrote the code. This is especially important for large or high-risk changes. It is useful to add a test plan to the pull request description if testing the changes is not straightforward.

Translations

Changes to translations as well as new translations can be submitted to Bitcoin Core's Transifex page.

Translations are periodically pulled from Transifex and merged into the git repository. See the translation process for details on how this works.

Important: We do not accept translation changes as GitHub pull requests because the next pull from Transifex would automatically overwrite them again.