71f016c6eb Remove old serialization primitives (Pieter Wuille)
92beff15d3 Convert LimitedString to formatter (Pieter Wuille)
ef17c03e07 Convert wallet to new serialization (Pieter Wuille)
65c589e45e Convert Qt to new serialization (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This is the final step 🥳 of the serialization improvements extracted from #10785.
It converts the LimitedString wrapper to a new-style formatter, and updates the wallet and Qt code to use the new serialization framework. Finally all remaining old primitives are removed.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 71f016c6eb reviewed diff, builds/tests/re-fuzzed.
laanwj:
Code review ACK 71f016c6eb
Tree-SHA512: d952194bc73259f6510bd4ab1348a1febbbf9862af30f905991812fb0e1f23f15948cdb3fc662be54d648e8f6d95b11060055d2e7a8c2cb5bf008224870b1ea1
fab6b9d18f validation: Mark g_chainman DEPRECATED (MarcoFalke)
fa1d97b256 validation: Make ProcessNewBlock*() members of ChainstateManager (MarcoFalke)
fa24d49098 validation: Make PruneOneBlockFile() a member of ChainstateManager (MarcoFalke)
fa84b1cd84 validation: Make LoadBlockIndex() a member of ChainstateManager (MarcoFalke)
fa05fdf0f1 net: Pass chainman into PeerLogicValidation (MarcoFalke)
fa7b626d7a node: Add chainman alias for g_chainman (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The global `g_chainman` has recently been introduced in #17737. The chainstate manager is primarily needed for the assumeutxo feature, but it can also simplify testing in the future.
The goal of this pull is to make the global chainstate manager internal to validation, so that all external code does not depend on globals and that unit or fuzz tests can pass in their (potentially mocked) chainstate manager.
I suggest reviewing the pull request commit-by-commit. It should be relatively straightforward refactoring that does not change behavior at all.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fab6b9d18f. Had to be rebased but still looks good
Tree-SHA512: dcbf114aeef4f8320d466369769f22ce4dd8f46a846870354df176c3de9ff17c64630fbd777e7121d7470d7a8564ed8d37b77168746e8df7489c6877e55d7b4f
b3f7f375ef refactor: Remove g_rpc_node global (Russell Yanofsky)
ccb5059ee8 scripted-diff: Remove g_rpc_node references (Russell Yanofsky)
6fca33b2ed refactor: Pass NodeContext to RPC and REST methods through util::Ref (Russell Yanofsky)
691c817b34 Add util::Ref class as temporary alternative for c++17 std::any (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This PR removes the `g_rpc_node` global, to get same benefits we see removing other globals and make RPC code more testable, modular, and reusable.
This uses a hybrid of the approaches suggested in #17548. Instead of using `std::any`, which isn't available in c++11, or `void*`, which isn't type safe, it uses a small new `util::Ref` helper class, which acts like a simplified `std::any` that only holds references, not values.
Motivation for writing this was to provide an simpler alternative to #18647 by Harris Brakmić (brakmic) which avoids some shortcomings of that PR (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18647#issuecomment-617878826)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK b3f7f375ef, only change is adding back const and more tests 🚾
ajtowns:
ACK b3f7f375ef
Tree-SHA512: 56292268a001bdbe34d641db1180c215351503966ff451e55cc96c9137f1d262225d7d7733de9c9da7ce7d7a4b34213a98c2476266b58c89dbbb0f3cb5aa5d70
f9ee0f37c2 Add comments to CustomUintFormatter (Pieter Wuille)
4eb5643e35 Convert everything except wallet/qt to new serialization (Pieter Wuille)
2b1f85e8c5 Convert blockencodings_tests to new serialization (Pieter Wuille)
73747afbbe Convert merkleblock to new serialization (Pieter Wuille)
d06fedd1bc Add SER_READ and SER_WRITE for read/write-dependent statements (Russell Yanofsky)
6f9a1e5ad0 Extend CustomUintFormatter to support enums (Russell Yanofsky)
769ee5fa00 Merge BigEndian functionality into CustomUintFormatter (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
The next step of changes from #10785.
This:
* Adds support for enum serialization to `CustomUintFormatter`, used in `CAddress` for service flags.
* Merges `BigEndian` into `CustomUintFormatter`, used in `CNetAddr` for port numbers.
* Converts everything (except wallet and gui) to use the new serialization framework.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK f9ee0f37c2, only change is new documentation commit for CustomUintFormatter 📂
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK f9ee0f37c2. Just new commit adding comment since last review
jonatack:
Code review re-ACK f9ee0f37c2 only change since last review is an additional commit adding Doxygen documentation for `CustomUintFormatter`.
Tree-SHA512: e7a0a36afae592d5a4ff8c81ae04d858ac409388e361f2bc197d9a78abca45134218497ab2dfd6d031e0cce0ca586cf857077b7c6ce17fccf67e2d367c1b6cd4
cd34038cbd Switch from Optional<T> to std::optional<T> (C++17). Run clang-format. (practicalswift)
fb559c1170 tests: Fill fuzzing coverage gaps for functions in util/translation.h (practicalswift)
b74f3d6c45 tests: Fill fuzzing coverage gaps for functions in consensus/validation.h (practicalswift)
c0bbf8193d tests: Fill fuzzing coverage gaps for functions in primitives/block.h (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
* Fill fuzzing coverage gaps for functions in `consensus/validation.h`
* Fill fuzzing coverage gaps for functions in `primitives/block.h`
* Fill fuzzing coverage gaps for functions in `util/translation.h`
* Switch from `Optional<T>` to `std::optional<T>` (C++17). Run `clang-format`.
See [`doc/fuzzing.md`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/fuzzing.md) for information on how to fuzz Bitcoin Core. Don't forget to contribute any coverage increasing inputs you find to the [Bitcoin Core fuzzing corpus repo](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets).
Happy fuzzing :)
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: d6aa4634c3953ade173589a8239bd230eb317ef897835a8557acb73df01b25e5e17bf46f837838e59ec04c1f3d3b7d1309ba68c8a264d17b938215512c9e6085
0000ea3265 test: Add test for GetRandMillis and GetRandMicros (MarcoFalke)
fa0e5b89cf Add templated GetRandomDuration<> (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
A naive implementation of this template is dangerous, because the call site might accidentally omit the template parameter:
```cpp
template <typename D>
D GetRandDur(const D& duration_max)
{
return D{GetRand(duration_max.count())};
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(util_time_GetRandTime)
{
std::chrono::seconds rand_hour = GetRandDur(std::chrono::hours{1});
// Want seconds to be in range [0..1hour), but always get zero :((((
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(rand_hour.count(), 0);
}
```
Luckily `std::common_type` is already specialised in the standard lib for `std::chrono::duration` (https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/chrono/duration/common_type). And its effect seem to be that the call site must always specify the template argument explicitly.
So instead of implementing the function for each duration type by hand, replace it with a templated version that is safe to use.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 0000ea3265
promag:
Code review ACK 0000ea3265.
jonatack:
ACK 0000ea3 thanks for the improved documentation. Code review, built, ran `src/test/test_bitcoin -t random_tests -l test_suite` for the new unit tests, `git diff fa05a4c 0000ea3` since previous review:
hebasto:
ACK 0000ea3265 with non-blocking [nit](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18781#discussion_r424924671).
Tree-SHA512: e89d46e31452be6ea14269ecbbb2cdd9ae83b4412cd14dff7d1084283092722a2f847cb501e8054394e4a3eff852f9c87f6d694fd008b3f7e8458cb5a3068af7
Fix the following error in travis:
test/validationinterface_tests.cpp:26:36: error: default initialization of an object of const type 'const BlockValidationState' without a user-provided default constructor
const BlockValidationState state_dummy;
7777f2a4bb miner: Avoid stack-use-after-return in validationinterface (MarcoFalke)
fa5ceb25fc test: Remove UninterruptibleSleep from test and replace it by SyncWithValidationInterfaceQueue (MarcoFalke)
fa770ce7fe validationinterface: Rework documentation, Rename pwalletIn to callbacks (MarcoFalke)
fab6d060ce test: Add unregister_validation_interface_race test (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
When a validationinterface has itself unregistered in one thread, but is about to get executed in another thread [1], there is a race:
* The validationinterface destructing itself
* The validationinterface getting dereferenced for execution
[1] 64139803f1/src/validationinterface.cpp (L82-L83)
This happens in the miner. More generally it happens everywhere where at least one thread is generating notifications and another one is unregistering a validationinterface.
This issue has been fixed in commit ab31b9d6fe, but the fix has not been applied to the miner.
Example where this happened in practice: https://travis-ci.org/github/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/675322230#L4414
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK 7777f2a4bb.
laanwj:
Code review ACK 7777f2a4bb
Tree-SHA512: 8087119243c71ba18a823a63515f3730d127162625d8729024278b447af29e2ff206f4840ee3d90bf84f93a2c5ab73b76c7e7044c83aa93b5b51047a166ec3d3
This commit is (intentionally) adding a broken test. The test is broken
because it registering a subscriber object that can go out of scope
while events are still being sent.
To run the broken test and reproduce the bug:
- Remove comment /** and */
- ./configure --with-sanitizers=address
- export ASAN_OPTIONS=detect_leaks=0
- make
- while ./src/test/test_bitcoin -t validationinterface_tests/unregister_validation_interface_race --catch_system_errors=no ; do true; done
68537275bd build: Enable -Werror=sign-compare (Ben Woosley)
eac6a3080d refactor: Rework asmap Interpret to avoid ptrdiff_t (Ben Woosley)
df37377e30 test: Fix outstanding -Wsign-compare errors (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
Disallowing sign-comparison mismatches can help to prevent the introduction of overflow and interpretation bugs.
In this case, ~all~ most existing violations are in the tests, and most simply required annotating the literal as unsigned for comparison.
This was previously prevented by violations in leveldb which were fixed upstream and merged in #17398. You can test that by building this branch against: 22d11187ee vs 75fb37ce68
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
re-ACK 68537275bd
practicalswift:
ACK 68537275bd
Tree-SHA512: 14b5daa38c496fb51548feb30fb4dd179e6f76a8d355f52bc8e2a18f2f9340f0bc98dcf36d8b3d6521045d013891c3103749a4eda88ceef00202a6a0cf93f73c
748977690e Add asmap_direct fuzzer that tests Interpreter directly (Pieter Wuille)
7cf97fda15 Make asmap Interpreter errors fatal and fuzz test it (Pieter Wuille)
c81aefc537 Add additional effiency checks to sanity checker (Pieter Wuille)
fffd8dca2d Add asmap sanity checker (Pieter Wuille)
5feefbe6e7 Improve asmap Interpret checks and document failures (Pieter Wuille)
2b3dbfa5a6 Deal with decoding failures explicitly in asmap Interpret (Pieter Wuille)
1479007a33 Introduce Instruction enum in asmap (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This improves/documents the failure cases inside the asmap interpreter. None of the changes are bug fixes (they only change behavior for corrupted asmap files), but they may make things easier to follow.
In a second step, a sanity checker is added that effectively executes every potential code path through the asmap file, checking the same failure cases as the interpreter, and more. It takes around 30 ms to run for me for a 1.2 MB asmap file.
I've verified that this accepts asmap files constructed by https://github.com/sipa/asmap/blob/master/buildmap.py with a large dataset, and no longer accepts it with 1 bit changed in it.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 748977690e modulo feedback below.
jonatack:
ACK 748977690e code review, regular build/tests/ran bitcoin with -asmap, fuzz build/ran both fuzzers overnight.
fjahr:
ACK 748977690e
Tree-SHA512: d876df3859735795c857c83e7155ba6851ce839bdfa10c18ce2698022cc493ce024b5578c1828e2a94bcdf2552c2f46c392a251ed086691b41959e62a6970821
fa47cf9d95 wallet: Fix typo in assert that is compile-time true (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Commit 92bcd70808 presumably added a check that a `dest` of type `CNoDestination` implies an empty `scriptChange`.
However, it accidentally checked for `boost::variant::empty`, which always returns false: https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_72_0/doc/html/boost/variant.html#id-1_3_46_5_4_1_1_16_2-bb
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
utACK fa47cf9d95
Tree-SHA512: 9626b1e2947039853703932a362c2ee204e002d3344856eb93eef0e0f833401336f2dfa80fd43b83c8ec6eac624e6302aee771fb67aec436ba6483be02b8d615
1ad8ea2b73 net: remove is{Empty,Full} flags from CBloomFilter, clarify CVE fix (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
The BIP37 bloom filter class `CBloomFilter` contains two flags `isEmpty`/`isFull` together with an update method with the purpose to, according to the comments, "avoid wasting cpu", i.e. the mechanism should serve as an optimization for the trivial cases of empty (all bits zero) or full (all bits one) filters.
However, the real reason of adding those flags (introduced with commit 37c6389c5a by gmaxwell) was a _covert fix_ of [CVE-2013-5700](https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2013-5700), a vulnerability that allowed a divide-by-zero remote node crash.
According to gmaxwell himself (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9060#issuecomment-257749165):
> the IsEmpty/IsFull optimizations were largely a pretextual optimization intended to make unexploitable a remote crash vulnerability (integer division by zero) that existed in the original bloom filtering code without disclosing it. I'm doubtful that they are all that useful. :)
For more information on how to trigger this crash, see PR https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18515 which contains a detailled description and a regression test. It has also been discussed on a [recent PR club meeting on fuzzing](https://bitcoincore.reviews/18521.html).
The covert fix code already led to issues and PR based on the wrong assumption that the flags are there for optimization reasons (see #16886 and #16922). This PR gets rid of the flags and the update method and just focuses on the CVE fix itself, i.e. it can be seen as a revert of the covert fix commit modulo the actual fix.
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
utACK 1ad8ea2b73
laanwj:
Concept and code review ACK 1ad8ea2b73
jkczyz:
ACK 1ad8ea2b73
MarcoFalke:
ACK 1ad8ea2b73
fjahr:
Code review ACK 1ad8ea2b73
Tree-SHA512: 29f7ff9faece0285e11e16c024851f5bcb772dec64118ccc3f9067ec256267ec8e1b1e3105c7de2a72fd122c3b085e8fc840ab8f4e49813f1cc7a444df1867f7
38e49ded8b tests: Add fuzzing harness for MessageSign, MessageVerify and other functions in util/message.h (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Add fuzzing harness for `MessageSign`, `MessageVerify` and other functions in `util/message.h`.
See [`doc/fuzzing.md`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/fuzzing.md) for information on how to fuzz Bitcoin Core. Don't forget to contribute any coverage increasing inputs you find to the [Bitcoin Core fuzzing corpus repo](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets).
Happy fuzzing :)
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
utACK 38e49ded8b
Tree-SHA512: 4f83718365d9c7e772a4ccecb31817bf17117efae2bfaf6e9618ff17908def0c8b97b5fa2504d51ab38b2e6f82c046178dd751495cc37ab4779c0b1ac1a4d211
b56607a89b Remove CCoinsViewCache::GetValueIn(...) (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Remove `CCoinsViewCache::GetValueIn(...)`.
Fixes#18858.
It seems like `GetValueIn` was added in #748 ("Pay-to-script-hash (OP_EVAL replacement)", merged in 2012) and the last use in validation code was removed in #8498 ("Near-Bugfix: Optimization: Minimize the number of times it is checked that no money...", merged in 2017).
`CCoinsViewCache::GetValueIn(…)` performs money summation like this:
```c++
CAmount CCoinsViewCache::GetValueIn(const CTransaction& tx) const
{
if (tx.IsCoinBase())
return 0;
CAmount nResult = 0;
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < tx.vin.size(); i++)
nResult += AccessCoin(tx.vin[i].prevout).out.nValue;
return nResult;
}
```
Note that no check is done to make sure that the resulting `nResult` is such that it stays within the money bounds (`MoneyRange(nResult)`), or that the summation does not trigger a signed integer overflow.
Proof of concept output:
```
coins.cpp:243:17: runtime error: signed integer overflow: 9223200000000000000 + 2100000000000000 cannot be represented in type 'long'
GetValueIn = -9221444073709551616
```
Proof of concept code:
```c++
CMutableTransaction mutable_transaction;
mutable_transaction.vin.resize(4393);
Coin coin;
coin.out.nValue = MAX_MONEY;
assert(MoneyRange(coin.out.nValue));
CCoinsCacheEntry coins_cache_entry;
coins_cache_entry.coin = coin;
coins_cache_entry.flags = CCoinsCacheEntry::DIRTY;
CCoinsView backend_coins_view;
CCoinsViewCache coins_view_cache{&backend_coins_view};
CCoinsMap coins_map;
coins_map.emplace(COutPoint{}, std::move(coins_cache_entry));
coins_view_cache.BatchWrite(coins_map, {});
const CAmount total_value_in = coins_view_cache.GetValueIn(CTransaction{mutable_transaction});
std::cout << "GetValueIn = " << total_value_in << std::endl;
```
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK b56607a89b
promag:
Code review ACK b56607a89b.
jb55:
ACK b56607a89b
hebasto:
ACK b56607a89b, I have not tested the code, but I have reviewed it and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: 2c8402b5753ec96703d12c57c3eda8eccf999ed3519134a87faaf0838cfe44b94ef384296af2a524c06c8756c0245418d181af9083548e360905fac9d79215e6
06e434d7d9 test: fix message for ECC_InitSanityCheck test (fanquake)
Pull request description:
OpenSSL is long gone.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Good catch. ACK 06e434d7d9
Tree-SHA512: 1a920fd6493e0374ca00633407e0130f987b136bc68d2062402747bda16a1e588a12bd8b0b8cdef828c9911f210386cfbdb25d478cb9b684d52769d197032064
692f8307fc test: add test for witness commitment index (fanquake)
06442549f8 validation: Add minimum witness commitment size constant (fanquake)
Pull request description:
16101de5f3: Per [BIP 141](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0141.mediawiki#Commitment_structure), the witness commitment structure is at least 38 bytes,
OP_RETURN (0x6a) + 36 (0x24) + 4 byte header (0xaa21a9ed) + 32 byte
SHA256 hash. It can be longer, however any additional data has no
consensus meaning.
54f8c48d6a: As per BIP 141, if there is more than 1 pubkey that matches the witness
commitment structure, the one with the highest output index should be
chosen. This adds a sanity check that we are doing that, which will fail
if anyone tries to "optimize" GetWitnessCommitmentIndex() by returning
early.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 692f8307fc🌵
jonatack:
Code review ACK 692f830
ajtowns:
ACK 692f8307fc
jnewbery:
utACK 692f8307fc
laanwj:
ACK 692f8307fc
Tree-SHA512: 7af3fe4b8a52fea2cdd0aec95f7bb935351a77b73d934bc88d6625a3503311b2a062cba5190b2228f97caa76840db3889032d910fc8e318ca8e7810a8afbafa0
32b6b386a5 tests: Sort fuzzing harnesses (practicalswift)
e1e181fad1 tests: Add fuzzing coverage for JSONRPCTransactionError(...) and RPCErrorFromTransactionError(...) (practicalswift)
103b6ecce0 tests: Add fuzzing coverage for TransactionErrorString(...) (practicalswift)
dde508b8b0 tests: Add fuzzing coverage for ParseFixedPoint(...) (practicalswift)
1532259fca tests: Add fuzzing coverage for FormatHDKeypath(...) and WriteHDKeypath(...) (practicalswift)
90b635e84e tests: Add fuzzing coverage for CHECK_NONFATAL(...) (practicalswift)
a4e3d13df6 tests: Add fuzzing coverage for StringForFeeReason(...) (practicalswift)
a19598cf98 tests: Add fuzzing harness for functions in system.h (ArgsManager) (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Add fuzzing harnesses for various classes/functions in `util/`.
See [`doc/fuzzing.md`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/fuzzing.md) for information on how to fuzz Bitcoin Core. Don't forget to contribute any coverage increasing inputs you find to the [Bitcoin Core fuzzing corpus repo](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets).
Happy fuzzing :)
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: d27947220850c2a202c7740f44140c17545f45522596912452ccab0c2f5379abeb07cc769982c7855cb465059425206371a2b75ee1c285b03984161c9619d0b0
As per BIP 141, if there is more than 1 pubkey that matches the witness
commitment structure, the one with the highest output index should be
chosen. This adds a sanity check that we are doing that, which will fail
if anyone trys to "optimise" GetWitnessCommitmentIndex() be returning
early.
Add unit test calling CreateWalletFromFile, which isn't currently called from
other unit tests, with some basic checks to make sure it rescans and registers
for notifications correctly.
Motivation for this change was to try to write a test that would fail without
the early `handleNotifications` call in ef8c6ca60767cac589d98ca57ee33179608ccda8
from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16426, but succeed with it:
ef8c6ca607/src/wallet/wallet.cpp (L3978-L3986)
However, writing a full test for the race condition that call prevents isn't
possible without the locking changes from #16426. So this PR just adds as much
test coverage as is possible now.
This new test is also useful for https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15719,
since it detects the stale notifications.transactionAddedToMempool notifications
that PR eliminates.
fd8e99da57 tests: Add fuzzing harness for functions in primitives/transaction.h (practicalswift)
d5a31b7cb4 tests: Add fuzzing harness for functions in primitives/block.h (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Add fuzzing harnesses for various classes/functions in `primitives/`.
See [`doc/fuzzing.md`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/fuzzing.md) for information on how to fuzz Bitcoin Core. Don't forget to contribute any coverage increasing inputs you find to the [Bitcoin Core fuzzing corpus repo](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets).
Happy fuzzing :)
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: ed54bd5b37ff5e40cfa8d3cd8c65d91a2f64fca87b6a5c3b8ddd6becd876ed172735fb53da4d00a86f318fb94517afd179e07cb28a43edf301ffe4dad703cca4
21fa0a44ab [docs] use consistent naming for possible_overwrite (John Newbery)
2685c214cc [tests] small whitespace fixup (John Newbery)
e9936966c0 scripted-diff: Rename PRUNED to SPENT in coins tests (John Newbery)
c205979031 [docs] Improve commenting in coins.cpp|h (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
- Add full commenting for spentness / DIRTYness / FRESHness and which combinations are valid
- Remove the 'pruned' terminology, which doesn't make sense since per-txout chainstate db was merged (#10195).
- Rename `potential_overwrite` to `possible_overwrite` to standardize terminology (there were previously examples of both, which made searching the codebase difficult).
- Make other minor improvements to the comments
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Re-ACK 21fa0a4 per `git diff 98bee55 21fa0a4` the only change since my previous review is the following code commenting diff in `src/coins.cpp::L177-179`; rebuilt/ran unit tests anyway as a sanity check on the unit test changes.
Tree-SHA512: 391e01588ef5edb417250080cec17361f982c4454bc5f8c6d78bbd528c68a2bb94373297760691295c24660ce1022ad3ef7599762f736c8eed772ce096d38c3d
ccccd51908 script: Remove undocumented and unused operator+ (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This operator has no documented use case and is also unused outside of test code. The test code and all other (imaginary) code that might use this operator is written more clear and concise by the existing CScript push operators for opcodes and data.
Removing the operator is also going to protect against accidentally reintroducing bugs like this 6ff5f718b6 (diff-8458adcedc17d046942185cb709ff5c3L1135) (last time it was used).
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK ccccd51908
Tree-SHA512: 43898ac77e4d9643d9f8ac6f8f65497a4f0bbb1fb5dcaecc839c3719aa36181ba77befb213e59a9f33a20a29e0173a0e9c4763b1930940b32c3d1598b3e39af9
3718ae2ef8 [tests] Don't initialize PrecomputedTransactionData in txvalidationcache tests (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
PrecomputedTransactionData is initialized inside CheckInputScripts(). No need to pre-initialize it before calling into CheckInputScripts().
Normally, I wouldn't bother, but we're making changes to `PrecomputedTransactionData` in #17977 which would break these tests without removing these constructions. Might as well get these changes out of the way here.
ACKs for top commit:
robot-visions:
ACK 3718ae2ef8
sipa:
utACK 3718ae2ef8
Tree-SHA512: bc9c095035a7072a2a91941df38cdbb969e817264efbaa6dcb88cc3ab132d9264aa0751fa588d1a5e45f37b4d2bb1903cda078765f0bbcc87d9cc47cbec5356a
6f8b498d18 fuzz: http_request workaround for libevent < 2.1.1 (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
The fuzz test `http_request` calls the following two internal libevent functions:
* `evhttp_parse_firstline_`
* `evhttp_parse_headers_`
Before libevent 2.1.1 however, internal functions names didn't end with an underscore (see libevent commit 8ac3c4c25b and [Changelog for 2.1.1.-alpha](https://github.com/libevent/libevent/blob/master/ChangeLog#L1830) when the change was first mentioned) hence the build fails with a linking error.
This PR adds a preprocessor workaround to the test that checks for the libevent version (via ~`_EVENT_NUMERIC_VERSION`~ `LIBEVENT_VERSION_NUMBER`) and creates wrapper functions mapping to naming scheme without underscore in case the version is older than 2.1.1.
Tested with Ubuntu Xenial 16.04.6 LTS and clang-8.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 6f8b498d18, tested on xenial:
Tree-SHA512: 3b9e0147b8aea22e417d418e3b6d4905f5be131c2b0ae4b0f8b9411c5606d2e22f1b23e1ecc6980ecab907c61404de09e588aae1ac43cf70cf9e8d006bbdee73
fa4632c417 test: Move boost/stdlib includes last (MarcoFalke)
fa488f131f scripted-diff: Bump copyright headers (MarcoFalke)
fac5c37300 scripted-diff: Sort test includes (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
When writing tests, often includes need to be added or removed. Currently the list of includes is not sorted, so developers that write tests and have `clang-format` installed will either have an unrelated change (sorting) included in their commit or they will have to manually undo the sort.
This pull preempts both issues by just sorting all includes in one commit.
Please be aware that this is **NOT** a change to policy to enforce clang-format or any other developer guideline or process. Developers are free to use whatever tool they want, see also #18651.
Edit: Also includes a commit to bump the copyright headers, so that the touched files don't need to be touched again for that.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fa4632c417
jonatack:
ACK fa4632c417, light review and sanity checks with gcc build and clang fuzz build
Tree-SHA512: 130a8d073a379ba556b1e64104d37c46b671425c0aef0ed725fd60156a95e8dc83fb6f0b5330b2f8152cf5daaf3983b4aca5e75812598f2626c39fd12b88b180
69ffddc83e refactor: Remove unused methods CBloomFilter::reset()/clear() (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
The method `CBloomFilter::reset()` was introduced by commit d2d7ee0e86 in 2015, but was never ever used, as far as I could find. As discovered by MarcoFalke, the method `clear()` is also unused outside of unit tests and is hence also removed.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 69ffddc83e
jonatack:
ACK 69ffddc83e, code review, compiled a fuzz build and started the bloom_filter fuzz test as a sanity check.
promag:
ACK 69ffddc83e.
Tree-SHA512: 6c53678545ad8e2fa1ffc0a8838e450462f26748a60632f738dc020f0eb494ae2c32841e6256e266ed9140177257a78b707123421942f3819a14ffcb9a99322f
bee88b8c58 tests: have coins simulation test also use CCoinsViewDB (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
Before this change, the coins simulation test uses a base view of type
CCoinsViewTest, which has no relevance outside of the unittest suite. Might as
well reuse this testcase with a more realistic configuration that has
CCoinsViewDB (i.e. in-memory leveldb) at the bottom of the view structure.
This adds explicit use of CCoinsViewDB in the unittest suite.
#### Before change
```
./src/test/test_bitcoin --run_test=coins_tests --catch_system_errors=no 21.99s user 0.04s system 99% cpu 22.057 total
```
#### After change
```
./src/test/test_bitcoin --run_test=coins_tests --catch_system_errors=no 78.80s user 0.04s system 100% cpu 1:18.82 total
```
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK bee88b8c58
Tree-SHA512: 75296b2bcbae2f46e780489aafb032592544a15c384d569d016005692fe79fe60d7f05857cf25cc7b0f9ab1c53b47886a6c71cca074a03fb9afec30e1f376858
fa176e253f test: Avoid accessing free'd memory in validation_chainstatemanager_tests (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa176e253f, though if you have to update this again, would suggest separating txindex test cleanup and the chainstatemanager test fix in separate commits, or identifying which part of the change is the bugfix fix in the commit description. Also to clean up the txindex test it might make sense to call SyncWithValidationInterfaceQueue in the test destructor to prevent nondeterminism in other tests
Tree-SHA512: 34c5dca283a7c205cd42b6aa59f00a71fd1bd980bc3d6640a18b280be11470bfabb2fd8c93fadde6fb8e084bcf96c80ec3aa72bbccccfde8a8260d173eaad08f
48973402d8 wallet: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in CWallet::GetKeyBirthTimes (Russell Yanofsky)
e958ff9ab5 wallet: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in CWallet::CreateTransaction (Russell Yanofsky)
c0d07dc4cb wallet: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in CWallet::ScanForWalletTransactions (Russell Yanofsky)
1be8ff280c wallet: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in rescanblockchain (Russell Yanofsky)
3cb85ac594 wallet refactor: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in CWallet::RescanFromTime (Russell Yanofsky)
f7ba881bc6 wallet: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in listsinceblock (Russell Yanofsky)
bc96a9bfc6 wallet: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in importmulti (Russell Yanofsky)
25a9fcf9e5 wallet: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in importwallet and dumpwallet (Russell Yanofsky)
c1694ce6bb wallet: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in importprunedfunds (Russell Yanofsky)
ade5f87971 wallet refactor: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in qt wallettests (Russell Yanofsky)
f6da44ccce wallet: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in tryGetTxStatus and tryGetBalances (Russell Yanofsky)
bf30cd4922 refactor: Add interfaces::FoundBlock class to selectively return block data (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This is a set of changes updating wallet code to make fewer calls to `Chain::Lock` methods, so the `Chain::Lock` class will be easier to remove in #16426 with fewer code changes and small changes to behavior.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 48973402d8, only change is fixing bug 📀
fjahr:
re-ACK 48973402d8, reviewed rebase and changes since last review, built and ran tests locally
ariard:
Coce Review ACK 4897340, only changes are one suggested by last review on more accurate variable naming, human-readable output, args comments in `findCommonAncestor`
Tree-SHA512: cfd2f559f976b6faaa032794c40c9659191d5597b013abcb6c7968d36b2abb2b14d4e596f8ed8b9a077e96522365261299a241a939b3111eaf729ba0c3ef519b
c9017ce3bc protect g_chainman with cs_main (James O'Beirne)
2b081c4568 test: add basic tests for ChainstateManager (James O'Beirne)
4ae29f5f0c use ChainstateManager to initialize chainstate (James O'Beirne)
5b690f0aae refactor: move RewindBlockIndex to CChainState (James O'Beirne)
89cdf4d569 validation: introduce unused ChainstateManager (James O'Beirne)
8e2ecfe249 validation: add CChainState.m_from_snapshot_blockhash (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the [assumeutxo project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11):
Parent PR: #15606
Issue: #15605
Specification: https://github.com/jamesob/assumeutxo-docs/tree/master/proposal
---
This changeset introduces `ChainstateManager`, which is responsible for creating and managing access to multiple chainstates. Until we allow chainstate creation from UTXO snapshots (next assumeutxo PR?) it's basically unnecessary, but it is a prerequisite for background IBD support.
Changes are also made to the initialization process to make use of `g_chainman` and thus clear the way for multiple chainstates being loaded on startup.
One immediate benefit of this change is that we no longer have the `g_blockman` global, but instead have the ChainstateManager inject a reference of its shared BlockManager into any chainstate it creates.
Another immediate benefit is that uses of `ChainActive()` and `ChainstateActive()` are now covered by lock annotations. Because use of `g_chainman` is annotated to require cs_main, these two functions subsequently follow.
Because of whitespace changes, this diff looks bigger than it is. E.g., 4813167d98 is most easily reviewed with
```sh
git show --color-moved=dimmed_zebra -w 4813167d98
```
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK c9017ce3bc📙
fjahr:
Code Review Re-ACK c9017ce3bc
ariard:
Code Review ACK c9017ce
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK c9017ce3bc. No changes since last review other than a straight rebase
Tree-SHA512: 3f250d0dc95d4bfd70852ef1e39e081a4a9b71a4453f276e6d474c2ae06ad6ae6a32b4173084fe499e1e9af72dd9007f4a8a375c63ce9ac472ffeaada41ab508
01a3392b1b Drop bitcoin-wallet dependency on libevent (Russell Yanofsky)
0660119ac3 Drop unintended bitcoin-tx dependency on libevent (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This fixes compile errors trying to build bitcoin-tx and bitcoin-wallet without libevent, which were reported by Luke Dashjr in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18465
The fix avoiding `bitcoin-tx` dependency on libevent just adds a conditional build rule. This is implemented in the first commit (more details in commit description).
The fix avoiding `bitcoin-wallet` dependency on libevent requires minor code changes, because `bitcoin-wallet` (unlike `bitcoin-tx`) links against code that calls `urlDecode` / `evhttp_uridecode`. This fix is implemented in the second commit (again details in the commit description).
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
utACK 01a3392b1b.
Tree-SHA512: d2245e912ab494cccceeb427a1eca8e55b01a0006ff93eebcfb5461ae7cecd1083ac2de443d9db036b18bdc6f0fb615546caaa20c585046f66d234937f74870a
