fafaad98f7 test: Set maxfeerate=0 in MiniWallet sendrawtransaction() (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
It should be safe to set, because MiniWallet will only ever deal with test transactions, so loss-of-funds is not a reason to keep the feerate check.
It is beneficial to set, as it makes tests less verbose to write. Also, it may speed up tests, as the fee-check can be skipped: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25087#discussion_r877246529
ACKs for top commit:
michaelfolkson:
ACK fafaad98f7
theStack:
Code-review ACK fafaad98f7
Tree-SHA512: 94c5c163595207a295c7b21f0127d669a9307f6f8b1de5e043d43c52a6714076e2fdce65f2644308a2b90c679642c94f771dab1ff8bc5c0c8b1f5013324b3902
025c6ca509 Squashed 'src/univalue/' changes from 6c19d050a9..de4f73ddca (MacroFake)
9b50a309ff refactor: Replace get_int by getInt<int> alias (MacroFake)
e4e8186ab4 refactor: Explicitly convert atomic<int> to int (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
This bumps the univalue subtree and changes two lines of our code. Apart from the get_int -> getInt change, this is mostly a rebase of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15975, which was closed back then.
However, given the numerous UniValue copy bugs and performance regressions in the past years, I think it makes sense to finally go through with the changes and disable potentially expensive implicit UniValue copies, which may cause OOM.
The changes here are not strictly required for that, but make future changes less verbose and easier to review.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fa0cc61b7f
fanquake:
ACK fa0cc61b7f
Tree-SHA512: 9ab9e371e6a745a80c441e99fb9cd407602a8066df883135e0ea7eced7b0c6ef0e9bc88f1d99a2b4804128d636727229f44d72b5615dbf2d70da4af63fa6adec
46a890960e build: pass bdb cppflags only where needed (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Move bdb cppflags out of the catch-all `BITCOIN_INCLUDES`, and pass them
only where they are needed, which is in libbitcoin_node/wallet and the tests.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 46a890960e
Tree-SHA512: ac639bf88be1c21c5205bb14c983330c72c37f17ec4c15a746a86c54dd83853e3d75802eff48c4647484b07c1bae943ca2c3d61d2a8b0bed07d9c5b4a71dcec4
1da5e45725 test: use MiniWallet for feature_dbcrash.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR enables one more of the non-wallet functional tests (feature_dbcrash.py) to be run even with the Bitcoin Code wallet by using the MiniWallet instead, as proposed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/20078.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 1da5e45725
brunoerg:
crACK 1da5e45725
Tree-SHA512: 75ee9a32fd1451254004797d695d18032bd0fcb66ebd88cf737e147e43812525f6e884ec05fcc4f76f566dc71174c8ed7347bcdce16567db6511746ae64cead0
52a797bfe5 doc: Avoid ADL for function calls (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
It happened two times recently, when [ADL](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/adl) popped up unexpectedly and brought some confusion:
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24338/files#r805989994
> Any idea why this even compiles?
- https://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2022-02-18.html#l-51:
> 2022-02-18T03:24:14 \<dongcarl\> Does anyone know why this compiles? 6d3d2caa37
> 2022-02-18T03:24:14 \<dongcarl\> GetUTXOStatsWithHasher and MakeUTXOHasher are both in the `kernel::` namespace and I never added a `using` declaration on top...
> 2022-02-18T03:25:53 \<sipa\> https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/adl ?
Let's document our intention to avoid similar cases in the future.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Anyhow, ACK 52a797bfe5, there is no need to hold merge up on this, documenting it is a step forward.
Tree-SHA512: f52688b5d8f6130302185206ec6ea4731b099a75294ea2d477901a52d6d58473e3427e658aea408c140c2824c37a0399ec7376aded2a91197895ea52d51f0018
fa2d226ac9 doc: Explain squashing with merge commits (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
This avoids having to explain it in each thread
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fa2d226ac9
Tree-SHA512: e1533ee7c0ab0101c78aaebed97dc889b5eb941cf4c2dfbabbb5f0ec1bb7b1313a1a2e2405235d68c761f039373cebac67ce691a72c820a9252429d50c1ac7d5
7d0f67a0d5 test: check pre-segwit peer error in `getblockfrompeer` RPC (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds missing test coverage for the `getblockfrompeer` RPC, in the case that a block is tried to be fetched from a pre-segwit peer (i.e. a peer that doesn't signal the service bit `NODE_WITNESS`):
d4d9daff7a/src/net_processing.cpp (L1564-L1565)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 7d0f67a0d5
Tree-SHA512: bc330820686fe45577e7a53d66e2a0b339ee3ca4ef348ba3cab0a78ed891e47b3651cadf3c6c3c35d1e9a95779df010322c12d37b36700e828f6064ae35842fd
f565b2836d Fixup option name in bench message (Ben Woosley)
bf209ac7a7 doc: Fix spelling errors identified by codespell in coments (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
From the output [here](https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5275612980969472?logs=lint#L849):
```
src/qt/test/addressbooktests.cpp:185: wilcard ==> wildcard
src/qt/test/addressbooktests.cpp:191: wilcard ==> wildcard
src/test/miniscript_tests.cpp:227: nd ==> and, 2nd
src/test/versionbits_tests.cpp:260: everytime ==> every time
src/util/time.h:89: precicion ==> precision
src/util/time.h:90: precicion ==> precision
^ Warning: codespell identified likely spelling errors. Any false positives? Add them to the list of ignored words in test/lint/spelling.ignore-words.txt
```
~~I left the 'nd' in miniscript_tests as-is, as it's valid miniscript,
and I'm wary of whitelisting it.~~
ACKs for top commit:
dunxen:
ACK f565b28
Tree-SHA512: 501a426c5f6f9761e2c8f980d5d955611428a827321888f53e0ae9526b0fecd43f9d1fa845fc70ae2489d77be6dc0b5b371dff55c5146f4b39ed874f4a1ea917
ebfc308ea4 test: add coverage for non-hex value to -minimumchainwork (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for the following init error:
b9ef5a10e2/src/init.cpp (L917-L919)
Passing a non-hex value to -minimumchainwork should throw an initial error.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK ebfc308ea4
kristapsk:
re-ACK ebfc308ea4
Tree-SHA512: c665903757ae3b8b2480df97bb888e60ba4387b009fcb8031041822e87a155a0e4950ebe79873c1034f0826504521d82b1fdfdb5e8378b227d14ca545b8d4e11
a35f963edf Add test for getheaders behavior (Suhas Daftuar)
ef6dbe6863 Respond to getheaders if we have sufficient chainwork (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
Previously, we would check to see if we were in IBD and ignore getheaders requests accordingly. However, the IBD criteria -- an optimization mostly targeted at behavior when we have peers serving us many blocks we need to download -- is difficult to reason about in edge-case scenarios, such as if the network were to go a long time without any blocks found and nodes are getting restarted during that time.
To make things simpler to reason about, just use `nMinimumChainWork` as our anti-DoS threshold for responding to a getheaders request; as long as our chain has that much work, it should be fine to respond to a peer asking for our headers (and this should allow such a peer to request blocks from us if needed).
ACKs for top commit:
klementtan:
crACK a35f963edf
naumenkogs:
ACK a35f963edf
MarcoFalke:
review ACK a35f963edf 🗯
Tree-SHA512: 131e3872e7fe80382ea9c1ec202d6c2dc59c006355c69000aa3f4ce6bccd02a6c689c8cb8f3542b5d9bc48bfa61edcbd1a78535c0b79018971d02bed2655d284
a7973bf8f4 Revert "build: more robustly check for fcf-protection support" (fanquake)
Pull request description:
We no-longer support Clang 7 (#24164). Introduced in #20720.
This reverts commit e9189a750b.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK a7973bf8f4
Tree-SHA512: 82559637f21a97434ab29f908ebda1aada08b0786cbbf0b4d11085241942314c3f04261a624c5cd2cb3c94c99046b56626830da6b9775981ab4ba10d5979f998
151009cf76 qt, wallet, refactor: Drop unused `WalletModel::PaymentRequestExpired` (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
The `PaymentRequestExpired` value in the `WalletModel::StatusCode` enumeration has been unused since bitcoin/bitcoin#17165.
ACKs for top commit:
furszy:
ACK 151009cf, no usage for it.
kristapsk:
cr ACK 151009cf76, checked that `PaymentRequestExpired` is not referenced anywhere else.
Tree-SHA512: c2ea3443af5d369ca294d79559869f688aaa806b91ffe0090f3b34638a8377ec2f11d6f5c09cc2d11ab55035850237e60e992acba671097a6642c6bb9e709273
e8959000b6 test: Use MiniWallet in rpc_rawtransaction.py (Daniela Brozzoni)
e93046c10b MOVEONLY: Move signrawtransactionwithwallet test (Daniela Brozzoni)
Pull request description:
This PR allows `rpc_rawtransaction.py` to be run even without the Core wallet by using the MiniWallet instead, as proposed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/20078.
This test was previously run twice, once with `--legacy-wallet` and once with
`--descriptors`. Since this would have meant running the same test twice
if the wallet wasn't compiled, now we run it just once with the legacy
wallet.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK e8959000b6
Tree-SHA512: d1580570a54dad8e30a5df1ab7d03ecb3f824efe6843323e1f3aef63592045d823c7d54fc86321dc7c1d414854a253431a01a7baa9f30426ea9a09ef11ae3a04
de4f73ddca Merge bitcoin-core/univalue-subtree#36: Drop overloaded members
076c051488 Drop overloaded members
06265321de Merge bitcoin-core/univalue-subtree#35: Remove get_int/get_int64 in favor of getInt<>
462c503aa4 Remove get_int/get_int64 in favor of getInt<>
68c8f5532d Merge bitcoin-core/univalue#34: doc: remove TODO
297c53a5ee doc: remove TODO
git-subtree-dir: src/univalue
git-subtree-split: de4f73ddca40487179e9ed08c6f6aa745d6cbba3
This test was previously run twice, once with `--legacy-wallet` and once with
`--descriptors`.
Now we run it only with `--legacy-wallet`, as all the tests has been
ported to the MiniWallet but `raw_multisig_transaction_legacy_tests`,
which can be run only with the legacy wallet.
We also decrease the number of nodes used from 4 to 3, making the test
run slightly faster.
Put signrawtransactionwithwallet_tests in rpc_signrawtransaction.py,
as the test is mainly testing the signrawtransaction RPC.
Review with `git show --color-moved=dimmed-zebra`
74743ad905 Clarify in release process how to update defaultAssumeValid/nMinimumChainWork (Jon Atack)
415345d547 Release process: use 4096 blocks and getbestblockhash for getchaintxstats (Jon Atack)
fe048f7f7c Specify in release process which chains need to be updated (Jon Atack)
584147682a Reorganize release process chainparams section to reduce repetition (Jon Atack)
e8f844888f Clarify release process overhead note to be more actionable (Jon Atack)
e538eada7c Release process: exclude huge files for mainnet m_assumed_blockchain_size (laanwj)
b4d2d74767 Release process: specify blockchain/chain_state units, reduce repetition (Jon Atack)
318655c395 Add missing references to signet in the release process (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Release process updates, fixes and clarifications regarding updating the chainparams:
- add missing references to signet
- specify specify blockchain/chainstate units, reduce repetition
- exclude huge files for m_assumed_blockchain_size on mainnet
- rewrite overhead note to be more actionable
- reorganize the chainparams section to reduce repetition
- specify which chains need to be updated
- use 4096 blocks and getbestblockhash for getchaintxstats
- clarify how to update defaultAssumeValid and nMinimumChainWork
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 74743ad905
brunoerg:
re-ACK 74743ad905
Tree-SHA512: 7fc092be739f63c5d8404add2dcbcd0c570b680ff0ab36a9b5a774b2e930717beebaa6c867ab6db6795b3c234d9016ab1ae905a78d6ea6610140a59930c43029
cc61bc2e19 compat: remove glibcxx sanity checks (fanquake)
Pull request description:
These checks were added in #4339, (see also #4081), to test
our back-compat stubs, however, those stubs no-longer exist (#22930),
meaning that these checks are now just testing some specific standard
library behaviour, without a particular rationale, or reason, compared
to any other standard library functionlity we use.
There has also been some discussion about our sanity checks in the
context of the libbitcoinkernel refactoring, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25065#discussion_r880668218.
Removing the checks removes the need to worry about atleast the
glibcxx checks.
Also remove the list of checks from the doc in `init.h`, because it is
incomplete, and anyone who wants to know what checks are included can
look at the function.
Guix Build (arm64):
```bash
e18a81e25b4707cbe113fb4d3ba2459013c1178e7cecfe446e4f14ee5ecd2ce8 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/arm-linux-gnueabihf/SHA256SUMS.part
9928cc38b79f827018cba0bdde98666b31806afcc79dd95a00acb8e153c36eec guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/arm-linux-gnueabihf/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-arm-linux-gnueabihf-debug.tar.gz
ebf4635ba4688899ae62e4bb17ebb2afb25c538c4a8068ef515920fd4e43754e guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/arm-linux-gnueabihf/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.gz
74c7e35b47c6d101fda7205f144d37150329b4c360db09d37b8c1437f3390898 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/arm64-apple-darwin/SHA256SUMS.part
6e12643b17be9326f1d873dfe51a52c082671540792877af624b42ca9f6e1791 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/arm64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-arm64-apple-darwin-unsigned.dmg
1d86d0416c7a50afd7bd8d850f416b7c7277464ccc95e4dae53b5b59415fc83d guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/arm64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-arm64-apple-darwin-unsigned.tar.gz
84070843f23839e7191ad3a667eb63c45f668eb95afbfb3fcdfb8363320f67d4 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/arm64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-arm64-apple-darwin.tar.gz
bf6ccd7b8c40476b1dc52b491757313ea3e96c43a01c8aabaf39f94dc1837329 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/dist-archive/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1.tar.gz
25e7e1ff7d8de38632abf9926343c8ba556209f3d03109c92864ffe72813a05f guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/powerpc64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
d0398de83841607b1bf921d4553b30ad5e2d70d0570e96a2eaaf2762e1103c79 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/powerpc64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-powerpc64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
f09cdc2ac2a2bb644f4749f3d74b5210ddb531594c33d127a907f0223e7793e5 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/powerpc64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-powerpc64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
ef36a68ef4e5ee9b311df40062cd2296f897e7b1550e39e0643601cd7d469010 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
937b600a2b86304ccc5b6c71a7eaf8aa5e2020592724cef6a933a1955995480b guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-powerpc64le-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
eca4eec41e71fdf7a7b0fa4065afa49c47d3b9541ed2cb4d083ad4a0de102e37 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-powerpc64le-linux-gnu.tar.gz
981c0968c19905925a599cff357ec259c1e806bdb7691c7b52039be450bdad7c guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/riscv64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
89c709967f9a157256281fbf682aad246f2eaad9c2f1797c2787253cbabe12f8 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/riscv64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-riscv64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
454cd830dd382e176f5a23041fc33f93937668245481b0dd29fc04882d9528eb guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/riscv64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-riscv64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
e0812c2dc492e5c5f06e3685d19da8fb29ed38d3b32821d293ef01cb4fefbd79 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/x86_64-apple-darwin/SHA256SUMS.part
0e7d4241d8ac882a8091fa00a7813db87a3e5afec59627e45b6c910cfdd4a7b0 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/x86_64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-x86_64-apple-darwin-unsigned.dmg
3faaca046cbb2642445a7dd1f389ed7bf94a65de8372441c36d5cb79c030ce31 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/x86_64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-x86_64-apple-darwin-unsigned.tar.gz
73080f032a42db679baf0d09619671ac5b9d85be84a68bdd6b6709eb0e6465bd guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/x86_64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-x86_64-apple-darwin.tar.gz
07b6e1b6291404bca1044df4a45b6958b882ffb88c143ba98f1959960a394897 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/x86_64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
16b455f62398f4aa0d3821abb1cceb8151e31c2664e3f974a764a5b8702b50f3 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/x86_64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-x86_64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
3c1a3a6a343f17b83f3b3d47e9426eccd2d0bcc7f824cd958fcf2cf06cdc3276 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/x86_64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-x86_64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
f05afa688ea7211b0049555385fb2acc26986e24d8d00893389160e07037e693 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/SHA256SUMS.part
8bcbae67dd0746c42e1e7c7db67725a69289b08e9aa97b873d443d0aa355615d guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-win64-debug.zip
efa45e3b76e5ae08a8392d58e741325df572d92c7dd69b65d876cdcda541d2fc guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-win64-setup-unsigned.exe
3a8c2461ca826138c3017d06279a79b4c6bee2a507ad362aa6e424f76678596c guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-win64-unsigned.tar.gz
e56ae4f609d4e6a3ca5917a4bb763c91012ece2d236d6b62a666358791e43525 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-win64.zip
```
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK cc61bc2e19
laanwj:
Concept and code review ACK cc61bc2e19
Tree-SHA512: 3da6aba44eef3f864fcbe897db1faa964923756e68c6a713e444b5d01c6d3542c3d7ca26678760e81a7a9e3cd40bd90622d0a7b697c27166817ba4f1023661ef
20ff4991e5 rpc: Capture potentially large UniValue by ref for rpcdoccheck (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
Capturing it by reference instead of value should save us from making a copy of a potentially large object. Saw this while having a look at #25229 although I couldn't reproduce an actual leak, so this is not a fix for that issue.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 20ff4991e5
theStack:
Code-review ACK 20ff4991e5
furszy:
Code ACK 20ff4991
Tree-SHA512: faf7bb14e37f8324b93a39095b07693626329da47c4a1ac8929bf99385e2e0567008e959e7e8540bc7d454d08fa41cccd39f55253c9a839fa88362922058a93b
885694d794 doc: add release note about removal of `deprecatedrpc=fees` flag (Sebastian Falbesoner)
387ae8bc09 rpc: remove deprecated fee fields from mempool entries (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Deprecating the top-level fee fields (`fee`, `modifiedfee`, `ancestorfees` and `descendantfees`) from the mempool entries and introducing `-deprecatedrpc=fees` was done in PR #22689 (released in v23.0). For the next release v24.0, this configuration option can be removed.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 885694d794
Tree-SHA512: fec6b5be5c3f0cd55738a888b390ef9271e70b2dba913a14ce82427dac002e999f93df298bb3b494f3d1b850a23d2b5b3e010e901543b0d18db9be133579e1ec
3ffc190321 ci: Install documented packages for "Win64" CI task (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This minor change has the following benefits:
- it follows the [documented](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/build-windows.md#building-for-64-bit-windows) way for modern Ubuntu distros (this CI task uses jammy)
- it makes package installation time shorter as no need to install the `g++-mingw-w64-x86-64-win32` package
- (not directly related to this repo) in https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui-qml Qt 5.15.3 (but not 5.15.2) build system goes [wild](https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6231535933194240) otherwise
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 3ffc190321
jarolrod:
ACK 3ffc190321
Tree-SHA512: 41fd6deedb3febc90cc4f2037dfbf840d82ef5b1dd950a0ff458cae6c1b1024559b21c8e1135c2d37780e80dd3f9f9751d638120443d0d60c22ac160cf693e2a
These checks were added in #4339, (see also #4081), to test
our back-compat stubs, however, those stubs no-longer exist (#22930),
meaning that these checks are now just testing some specific standard
library behaviour, without a particular rationale, or reason, compared
to any other standard library functions we use.
There has also been some discussion about the sanity checks in the
context of the libbitcoinkernel refactoring, see
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25065#discussion_r880668218.
Removing the checks removes the need to worry about atleast the glibcxx
checks.
Also remove the list of check from the doc in init.h, because it is
incomplete, and anyone who wants to know what checks are included can
look at the function.
fa27ee88ed Get time less often in AddrManImpl::ResolveCollisions_() (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
First commit split out from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24697
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK fa27ee88ed
fanquake:
ACK fa27ee88ed
Tree-SHA512: 40c8594d2a5ce02a392ac5f9f120c24c6bcd495b0bcc901fd6064dde9f6123cd109504cee7b612a9555b70cfd7759cbd6cd496d007bb374c27610d01b464191c
44904aa632 multiprocess build cleanup: comment on manual dependencies (Ryan Ofsky)
6e1c16c144 multiprocess build fix: ipc/capnp/init.capnp.h: No such file or directory (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
Error was reported by SatoriHoshiAiko in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25207 and happens unpredictably because make doesn't always build dependencies in the same order.
The source file `src/ipc/capnp/protocol.cpp` includes some generated headers so needs to have an explicit dependency specified in the makefile so the headers will be generated before the file is compiled. #19160 added the explicit dependency, but it was incorrect because it referred to an old file path from before the source file was renamed (`ipc.cpp` -> `protocol.cpp`)
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK 44904aa632
Tree-SHA512: 578ef4ef35a97e9d8d4e6d4edf39e57a32674234bf145e8159268324cb6ba15b420517afc07f6f42bb11a562954ea74af686c3fb92ce178c1fc378421b352531
4185570340 Add RPC to get mempool txs spending outputs (t-bast)
Pull request description:
We add an RPC to fetch mempool transactions spending any of the given outpoints.
Without this RPC, application developers need to first call `getrawmempool` which returns a long list of `txid`, then fetch each of these transactions individually (`getrawtransaction`) to check whether they spend the given outpoints, which wastes a lot of bandwidth (in the worst case we need to transfer the whole mempool).
For example in lightning, when we discover that one of our channel funding transactions has been spent, we need to find the spending transaction to claim our outputs from it. We are currently forced to fetch the whole mempool to do the analysis ourselves, which is quite costly.
I believe that this RPC is also generally useful when doing some introspection on your mempool after one of your transactions failed to broadcast, for example when you implement RBF at the application level. Fetching and analyzing the conflicting transaction gives you more information to successfully replace it.
ACKs for top commit:
darosior:
re-utACK 4185570340
vincenzopalazzo:
re-ACK 4185570340
danielabrozzoni:
re-tACK 4185570340
w0xlt:
reACK 4185570340
Tree-SHA512: 206687efb720308b7e0b6cf16dd0a994006c0b5a290c8eb386917a80130973a6356d0d5cae1c63a01bb29e066dd721594969db106cba7249214fcac90d2c3dbc
7036cf52aa Delete UpdatePackagesForAdded at beginning of addPackageTxs. (KevinMusgrave)
Pull request description:
In `CreateNewBlock` (in miner.cpp), `inBlock` is cleared before `addPackageTxs`, so `inBlock` will be empty in the first call to `UpdatePackagesForAdded`. I saw this brought up in these [PR review club logs](https://bitcoincore.reviews/24538) and there didn't seem to be a definitive answer for why the call is necessary. There's also an [old PR](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10200) where this change was going to be applied, but it got closed.
If `addPackageTxs` can be called when `inBlock` is not empty, then maybe a test should be added for that case. All the tests seem to pass with this deletion.
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
utACK 7036cf52aa
Tree-SHA512: 9e757b71b9035f68a0c6fef229b8cd83f1bdbe23f05bb02cc1bab8c3c177805b388bceb2bb1f0bce354791ccb29f351a6c51979b96ffe4d9fc6c978f83e36afc
7e9fe6d800 windeploy: Renewed windows code signing certificate (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
The current windows code signing certificate expires on May 26 23:59:59 2022 GMT. I have purchased a new code signing certificate which will expire on May 29 23:59:59 2024 GMT.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 7e9fe6d800
fanquake:
ACK 7e9fe6d800 - tested above with OpenSSL 3 & faketime.
Tree-SHA512: 283eb863d4db0573c7e78fe9d8f1b855533fc45b0995cd2d66e40b5242eb9bc9317b01e1b151fe49d512cd4aa6c48e2390017070f79db46493813fdd0a0f568a
75848ec2da scripts and tools: update lint-logs.py to detect LogPrintLevel() (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Follow-up to #24464 that added the `LogPrintLevel()` macro.
- update the `lint-logs.py` script to detect `LogPrintLevel()`
- add `WalletLogPrintf()` (already detected but not mentioned) to the linter suggestion
Example output:
```
$ test/lint/lint-logs.py
All calls to LogPrintf(), LogPrint(), LogPrintLevel(), and WalletLogPrintf() should be terminated with "\n".
src/addrdb.cpp:147: LogPrintf("banlist.dat ignored because it can only be read by " PACKAGE_NAME " version 22.x. Remove %s to silence this warning.", fs::quoted(fs::PathToString(m_banlist_dat)));
src/addrman.cpp:388: LogPrint(BCLog::ADDRMAN, "addrman lost %i new and %i tried addresses due to collisions or invalid addresses", nLostUnk, nLost);
src/banman.cpp:41: LogPrintf("Recreating the banlist database");
src/banman.cpp:66: LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "Flushed %d banned node addresses/subnets to disk %dms", banmap.size(),
src/banman.cpp:194: LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "Removed banned node address/subnet: %s", sub_net.ToString());
src/net.cpp:2092: LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "Trying to make an anchor connection to %s", addrConnect.ToString());
src/net.cpp:2408: LogPrintLevel(BCLog::Level::Error, BCLog::NET, "%s", strError.original);
src/net.cpp:2416: LogPrintf("%s", strError.original);
src/net.cpp:2432: LogPrintf("%s", strError.original);
src/net.cpp:2453: LogPrintLevel(BCLog::Level::Error, BCLog::NET, "%s", strError.original);
src/netbase.cpp:573: LogPrintf("wait for connect to %s failed: %s",
src/netbase.cpp:578: LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "connection attempt to %s timed out", addrConnect.ToString());
src/netbase.cpp:590: LogPrintf("getsockopt() for %s failed: %s", addrConnect.ToString(), NetworkErrorString(WSAGetLastError()));
src/wallet/wallet.cpp:186: wallet->WalletLogPrintf("Releasing wallet");
src/wallet/wallet.cpp:1809: WalletLogPrintf("Rescan completed in %15dms", duration_milliseconds.count());
```
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 75848ec2da
Tree-SHA512: 78b3bc4428aaec2d198e1ff1c44b614fa2f2a228feb6303d97765136e4796171928d341c6e55a1d4e9e5a82ab099b14fee562b878dcf7bd2276f87bd9a8d323e
c4c5b9ca6e consensus/params: set default values for BIP9Deployment (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
Adds default values for `vDeployments` in `consensus/params.h` so that undefined behaviour is avoided if a deployment is not initialized. Also adds a check in the unit tests to alert if this is happening, since even if it doesn't invoke undefined behaviour it's probably a mistake.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK c4c5b9ca6e
Tree-SHA512: 22d7ff86a817d9e9e67c47301fc3b7e9d5821c13565d7706711f113dea220eea29b413a7c8d029691009159cebc85a108d77cb52418734091c196bafb2b12423
6b636730f4 tracing: fix `coin_selection:aps_create_tx_internal` calling logic (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
According to the documentation, the tracepoint `coin_selection:aps_create_tx_internal` "Is called when the second `CreateTransactionInternal` with Avoid Partial Spends enabled completes."
Currently it is only called if the second call to `CreateTransactionInternal` succeeds, i.e. the third parameter is always `true` and we don't get notified in the case that it fails. This PR fixes this by moving the tracepoint call and the `use_aps` boolean variable outside the if body.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 6b636730f4
furszy:
re-ACK 6b636730
Tree-SHA512: 453825123aa10748642c7dd94324ced2d07df0f4fac478b0947a34820b515ae300f75721679a90a164f3127029739df55c4de035c4567e663893c3c6dbdef216
f9fdcec7e9 settings: Add resetSettings() method (Ryan Ofsky)
77fabffef4 init: Remove Shutdown() node.args reset (Ryan Ofsky)
0e55bc6e7f settings: Add update/getPersistent/isIgnored methods (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
Add `interfaces::Node` `updateSetting`, `forceSetting`, `resetSettings`, `isSettingIgnored`, and `getPersistentSetting` methods so GUI is able to manipulate `settings.json` file and use and modify node settings.
(Originally this PR also contained GUI changes to unify bitcoin-qt and bitcoind persistent settings and call these methods, but the GUI commits have been dropped from this PR and moved to bitcoin-core/gui/pull/602)
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
ACK f9fdcec7e9
hebasto:
re-ACK f9fdcec7e9, only a function renamed since my recent [review](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15936#pullrequestreview-979324357).
Tree-SHA512: 4cac853ee29be96d2ff38404165b9dfb7c622b2a9c99a15979596f3484ffde0da3d9c9c372677dff5119ca7cffa6383d81037fd9889a29cc9285882a8dc0c268
43ff37f60e Update zmq.md: Fix parameter in hwm example block (mutatrum)
Pull request description:
Looks like a copy/paste error when `zmqpubsequence` was introduced.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
ACK 43ff37f60e
Tree-SHA512: 4d0abbba4e9fd0adc2824d0804891d677d56216d245ed0d3bffbaf76042c650edf68975d1ec4728328e69421c024fe6f8800c7e0a497934082206ea4f15cc517
be6d4315c1 doc: remove misleading AreInputsStandard() comment (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This check isn't any longer just about bad pay-to-script-hash inputs; it
also excludes any kind of nonstandard input, unknown witness versions,
coinbases, etc.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK be6d4315c1
dunxen:
ACK be6d431
jonatack:
ACK be6d4315c1
Tree-SHA512: 1c4befadff6a7b5789901ca2a2cc39adc35c688f7e3c093ab5292123f9193ce078731016b773b3d05f7004ff01ee62f23f8362ae8d05134d41dc097ba094a42b
c4e7717727 refactor: Change LogPrintLevel order to category, severity (laanwj)
ce920713bf leveldb: Log messages from leveldb with category and debug level (laanwj)
18ec120bb9 http: Use severity-based logging for messages from libevent (laanwj)
bd971bffb0 logging: Unconditionally log levels >= WARN (laanwj)
Pull request description:
Log messages from leveldb and libevent libraries in the severity+level based log format introduced in bitcoin/bitcoin#24464.
Example of messages before:
```
2022-05-24T18:11:57Z [libevent] libevent: event_add: event: 0x55da963fcc10 (fd 10), EV_READ call 0x7f1c7a254620
2022-05-24T18:11:57Z [libevent] libevent: Epoll ADD(1) on fd 10 okay. Old events were 0; read change was 1 (add); write change was 0 (none); close change was 0 (none)
2022-05-24T18:12:08Z leveldb: Generated table #609127@1: 6445 keys, 312916 bytes
2022-05-24T18:12:08Z leveldb: Generated table #609128@1: 5607 keys, 268548 bytes
2022-05-24T18:12:08Z leveldb: Generated table #609129@1: 189 keys, 9384 bytes
2022-05-24T18:12:08Z leveldb: Generated table #609130@1: 293 keys, 13818 bytes
```
Example of messages after:
```
2022-05-24T17:59:52Z [libevent:debug] event_add: event: 0x5652f44dac10 (fd 10), EV_READ call 0x7f210f2e6620
2022-05-24T17:59:52Z [libevent:debug] Epoll ADD(1) on fd 10 okay. Old events were 0; read change was 1 (add); write change was 0 (none); close change was 0 (none)
2022-05-24T17:59:53Z [leveldb:debug] Recovering log #1072
2022-05-24T17:59:53Z [leveldb:debug] Level-0 table #1082: started
2022-05-24T17:59:53Z [leveldb:debug] Level-0 table #1082: 193 bytes OK
2022-05-24T17:59:53Z [leveldb:debug] Delete type=3 #1070
2022-05-24T17:59:53Z [leveldb:debug] Delete type=0 #1072
```
The first commit changes it so that messages with level Warning and Error are always logged independent of the `-debug` setting. I think this is useful to make sure warnings and errors, which tend to be important, are not lost. In the future this should be made more configurable.
Last commit changes LogPrintLevel argument order to category, severity: This is more consistent with the other functions, as well as with the logging output itself. If we want to make this change, we should do it before it's all over the place.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Tested ACK c4e7717727
Tree-SHA512: ea48a1517f8c1b23760e59933bbd64ebf09c32eb947e31b8c2696b4630ac1f4303b126720183e2de052bcede3a17e475bbf3fbb6378a12b0fa8f3582d610930d
bd7c5e2f0a Add BIP-341 specified constraints to `ComputeTaprootMerkleRoot` (David Bakin)
Pull request description:
[**N.B.:** This PR **_does not change the consensus_**. It only adds `assert` statements according to the current consensus in consensus-sensitive code (`interpreter.cpp`). So that's why the bot added the "consensus" tag and I prefixed the PR title with "consensus".]
BIP 341 specifies [constraints on the size of the control block _c_ used to compute the taproot merkle root](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0341.mediawiki#script-validation-rules).
> The last stack element is called the control block _c_, and must have length _33 + 32m_, for a value of _m_ that is an integer between 0 and 128, inclusive. Fail if it does not have such a length.
The actual merkle root is computed in `ComputeTaprootMerkleRoot` ([interpreter.cpp@1833](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/script/interpreter.cpp#L1833)) - this code does _not_ check these constraints.
All the callers do check the constraints before calling `ComputeTaprootMerkleRoot`. But in the future there may be more callers, and these checks may be inadvertently omitted at those future calls. Also, code at/near the current call sites may also change and skip these checks. Therefore _this PR adds those checks as `asserts` directly in `ComputeTaprootMerkleRoot`_ to help prevent that error.
No unit tests provided: they'd have to be death tests as these are `assert` statements which raise `SIGABRT` and kill the program. Boost Test has a way to implement death tests (see the in-progress draft PR #25097 at [this code (you may have to click to expand the diff)](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25097/files#diff-21483d0e032747850208f21325b29cde89e9c1f55f83a7a166a388cc5c27115aR1089) and could be added here if desired by reviewers.
Current callers of `ComputeTaprootMerkleRoot`:
- `InferTaprootTree` ([standard.cpp@1552](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/script/standard.cpp#L546))
- `VerifyTaprootCommittment` ([interpreter.cpp@1859](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/script/interpreter.cpp#L1859)) does a partial check, but it is called from `VerifyWitnessProgram` ([interpreter.cpp@1922](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/script/interpreter.cpp#L1918)) where a full check is done
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
ACK bd7c5e2f0a
theStack:
ACK bd7c5e2f0a
Tree-SHA512: cec5aebfdf9fc9d13011abdf8427c934edf1df1ffc32b3e7cc5580f12809f24cf83e64ab0c843fabfce3591873bfcfa248277b30820fd786684319a196e4e550
