The "A fatal internal error occurred, see debug.log for details" is
redundant because init.cpp will already show an InitError with a better
error message as well as the hint to check the debug.log
412d5fe879 QA: feature_segwit: Check that template "rules" includes "!segwit" as appropriate (Luke Dashjr)
2abe8cc3b7 Bugfix: Include "csv","!segwit" in "rules" (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
#16060 removed CSV & segwit from versionbits, breaking the "rules" key returned by GBT.
Without this, miners don't know they're mining segwit blocks, and should fall back to pre-segwit block creation.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
ACK 412d5fe879
jnewbery:
Tested ACK 412d5fe879.
Tree-SHA512: 825d72e257dc0dd4941f2fe498d8d4f4f2a21b9505cd21a8f9eb7fb5d6d7dd9219347928cf90bb57a777920ce24295859763e64fa8a22ebb58fc2380f80f5615
a0d0f1c6c3 refactor: Remove Node:: queries from GUI (Hennadii Stepanov)
06d519f0b4 qt: Add SynchronizationState enum to signal parameter (Hennadii Stepanov)
3c709aa69d refactor: Remove Node::getReindex() call from GUI (Hennadii Stepanov)
1dab574edf refactor: Pass SynchronizationState enum to GUI (Hennadii Stepanov)
2bec309ad6 refactor: Remove unused bool parameter in RPCNotifyBlockChange() (Hennadii Stepanov)
1df77014d8 refactor: Remove unused bool parameter in BlockNotifyGenesisWait() (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR is a followup of #18121 and:
- addresses confusion about GUI notification throttling conditions (**luke-jr**'s [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18121#discussion_r378552386), **ryanofsky**'s [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18121#discussion_r378975960))
- removes `isInitialBlockDownload()` call from the GUI back to the node (on macOS). See: **ryanofsky**'s [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18121#pullrequestreview-357730284)
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
Core Review ACK a0d0f1c6c3 (modulo [question](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18152#pullrequestreview-414140601)).
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK a0d0f1c6c3. Only changes since last review were rebase and tweaking SynchronizationState enum declaration as suggested (thanks!)
Tree-SHA512: b6a712a710666e763aeee0d5440de1391a4c6c8f7fa661888773e1ba59e9e0f83654ee384d4edc704031be7eb25616e5eca2a6e26058d3efb7f64c47f9ed7316
fa243be1dc log: Remove "No rpcpassword set" from logs (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
rpcpassword is deprecated and not recommended anymore. So remove it from the logs, which indicate that an rpcpassword should be set and cause confusion. See #18998.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa243be1dc. New log message makes more sense
elichai:
Re Code Review ACK (Checked the diff) fa243be1dc
Tree-SHA512: de3e0800a204b15a59a59a7e6f345013ee9d38e8c5d0c9a94d6142780faa9cce672ed358c7571f53c1eb843bf5afb0b7bcbfd289d3b9e2e0bf8ff2fd361e98a9
2896c412fa Do not answer GETDATA for to-be-announced tx (Pieter Wuille)
f2f32a3dee Push down use of cs_main into FindTxForGetData (Pieter Wuille)
c6131bf407 Abstract logic to determine whether to answer tx GETDATA (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This PR intends to improve transaction-origin privacy.
In general, we should try to not leak information about what transactions we have (recently) learned about before deciding to announce them to our peers. There is a controlled transaction dissemination process that reveals our transactions to peers that has various safeguards for privacy (it's rate-limited, delayed & batched, deterministically sorted, ...), and ideally there is no way to test which transactions we have before that controlled process reveals them. The handling of the `mempool` BIP35 message has protections in this regard as well, as it would be an obvious way to bypass these protections (handled asynchronously after a delay, also deterministically sorted).
However, currently, if we receive a GETDATA for a transaction that we have not yet announced to the requester, we will still respond to it if it was announced to *some* other peer already (because it needs to be in `mapRelay`, which only happens on the first announcement). This is a slight privacy leak.
Thankfully, this seems easy to solve: `setInventontoryTxToSend` keeps track of the txids we have yet to announce to a peer - which almost(*) exactly corresponds to the transactions we know of that we haven't revealed to that peer. By checking whether a txid is in that set before responding to a GETDATA, we can filter these out.
(*) Locally resubmitted or rebroadcasted transactions may end up in setInventoryTxToSend while the peer already knows we have them, which could result in us incorrectly claiming we don't have such transactions if coincidentally requested right after we schedule reannouncing them, but before they're actually INVed. This is made even harder by the fact that filterInventoryKnown will generally keep known reannouncements out of setInventoryTxToSend unless it overflows (which needs 50000 INVs in either direction before it happens).
The condition for responding now becomes:
```
(not in setInventoryTxToSend) AND
(
(in relay map) OR
(
(in mempool) AND
(old enough that it could have expired from relay map) AND
(older than our last getmempool response)
)
)
```
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
utACK 2896c41
ajtowns:
ACK 2896c412fa
amitiuttarwar:
code review ACK 2896c412fa
jonatack:
ACK 2896c412fa per `git diff 2b3f101 2896c41` only change since previous review is moving the recency check up to be verified first in `FindTxForGetData`, as it was originally in 353a391 (good catch), before looking up the transaction in the relay pool.
jnewbery:
code review ACK 2896c412fa
Tree-SHA512: e7d5bc006e626f60a2c108a9334f3bbb67205ace04a7450a1e4d4db1d85922a7589e0524500b7b4953762cf70554c4a08eec62c7b38b486cbca3d86321600868
Cache block filter headers at heights of multiples of 1000 in memory.
Block filter headers at height 1000x are checkpointed, and will be the
most frequently requested. Cache them in memory to avoid costly disk
reads.
cd34038cbd Switch from Optional<T> to std::optional<T> (C++17). Run clang-format. (practicalswift)
fb559c1170 tests: Fill fuzzing coverage gaps for functions in util/translation.h (practicalswift)
b74f3d6c45 tests: Fill fuzzing coverage gaps for functions in consensus/validation.h (practicalswift)
c0bbf8193d tests: Fill fuzzing coverage gaps for functions in primitives/block.h (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
* Fill fuzzing coverage gaps for functions in `consensus/validation.h`
* Fill fuzzing coverage gaps for functions in `primitives/block.h`
* Fill fuzzing coverage gaps for functions in `util/translation.h`
* Switch from `Optional<T>` to `std::optional<T>` (C++17). Run `clang-format`.
See [`doc/fuzzing.md`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/fuzzing.md) for information on how to fuzz Bitcoin Core. Don't forget to contribute any coverage increasing inputs you find to the [Bitcoin Core fuzzing corpus repo](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets).
Happy fuzzing :)
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: d6aa4634c3953ade173589a8239bd230eb317ef897835a8557acb73df01b25e5e17bf46f837838e59ec04c1f3d3b7d1309ba68c8a264d17b938215512c9e6085
It is no longer necessary to wait for IBD to be complete before setting
a HD seed. This check was originally to ensure that restoring an old
seed on an out of sync node would scan the entire blockchain and thus
not miss transactions that involved keys that were not in the keypool.
This was necessary as once the seed was changed, no further keys would
be derived from the old seed(s).
As we are now topping up inactive seeds as we find those keys to be
used, this check is no longer necessary. During IBD, each time we
find a used key belonging to an inactive hd seed, we will still generate
more keys from that inactive seed.
0000ea3265 test: Add test for GetRandMillis and GetRandMicros (MarcoFalke)
fa0e5b89cf Add templated GetRandomDuration<> (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
A naive implementation of this template is dangerous, because the call site might accidentally omit the template parameter:
```cpp
template <typename D>
D GetRandDur(const D& duration_max)
{
return D{GetRand(duration_max.count())};
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(util_time_GetRandTime)
{
std::chrono::seconds rand_hour = GetRandDur(std::chrono::hours{1});
// Want seconds to be in range [0..1hour), but always get zero :((((
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(rand_hour.count(), 0);
}
```
Luckily `std::common_type` is already specialised in the standard lib for `std::chrono::duration` (https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/chrono/duration/common_type). And its effect seem to be that the call site must always specify the template argument explicitly.
So instead of implementing the function for each duration type by hand, replace it with a templated version that is safe to use.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 0000ea3265
promag:
Code review ACK 0000ea3265.
jonatack:
ACK 0000ea3 thanks for the improved documentation. Code review, built, ran `src/test/test_bitcoin -t random_tests -l test_suite` for the new unit tests, `git diff fa05a4c 0000ea3` since previous review:
hebasto:
ACK 0000ea3265 with non-blocking [nit](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18781#discussion_r424924671).
Tree-SHA512: e89d46e31452be6ea14269ecbbb2cdd9ae83b4412cd14dff7d1084283092722a2f847cb501e8054394e4a3eff852f9c87f6d694fd008b3f7e8458cb5a3068af7
050e2ee6f2 test: Remove const to work around compiler error on xenial (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Fix the following error in travis:
test/validationinterface_tests.cpp:26:36: error: default initialization of an object of const type 'const BlockValidationState' without a user-provided default constructor
const BlockValidationState state_dummy;
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
Tested ACK 050e2ee6f2 on xenial with clang version 3.8.0-2ubuntu4 (tags/RELEASE_380/final)
fanquake:
ACK 050e2ee6f2 - I see why we didn't hit this on master. We are installing the `clang-8` packages for the tsan job. However on the 0.20 branch we are still just installing `clang`, which is 3.8.
Tree-SHA512: 8a1d57289dbe9895ab79f81ca87b4fd723426b8d72f3a34bec9553226fba69f6dc19551c1f1d52db6c4b2652164a02ddc60f3187c3e2ad7bcacb0aaca7fa690a
746736639e [net processing] Only send a getheaders for one block in an INV (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Headers-first is the primary method of announcement on the network. If a node fell back sending blocks by inv, it's probably for a re-org. The final block hash provided should be the highest, so send a getheaders and then fetch the blocks we need to catch up.
Sending many GETHEADERS messages to the peer would cause them to send a large number of potentially large HEADERS messages with redundant data, which is a waste of bandwidth.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 746736639e
mzumsande:
utACK 746736639e as per ajtowns' reasoning.
naumenkogs:
utACK 7467366
ajtowns:
ACK 746736639e
jonatack:
ACK 746736639e
Tree-SHA512: 59e243b80d3f0873709dfacb2e4ffba34689aad7de31ec7f69a64e0e3a0756235a0150e4082ff5de823949ba4411ee1aed2344b4749b62e0eb1ea906e41f5ea9
fa1f840596 rpcwallet: Replace pwallet-> with wallet. (MarcoFalke)
fa182a8794 rpcwallet: Replace boost::optional<T>::emplace with simple assignment of T{} (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Closes#18943
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fa1f840596
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa1f840596 and thanks for using a standalone commit for the fix
promag:
Code review ACK fa1f840596.
hebasto:
ACK fa1f840596, tested on Linux Mint 19.3.
Tree-SHA512: 0838485d1f93f737ce5bf12740669dcafeebb78dbc3fa15dbcc511edce64bf024f60f0497a04149a1e799d893d57b0c9ffe442020c1b9cfc3c69db731f50e712
Fix the following error in travis:
test/validationinterface_tests.cpp:26:36: error: default initialization of an object of const type 'const BlockValidationState' without a user-provided default constructor
const BlockValidationState state_dummy;
7777f2a4bb miner: Avoid stack-use-after-return in validationinterface (MarcoFalke)
fa5ceb25fc test: Remove UninterruptibleSleep from test and replace it by SyncWithValidationInterfaceQueue (MarcoFalke)
fa770ce7fe validationinterface: Rework documentation, Rename pwalletIn to callbacks (MarcoFalke)
fab6d060ce test: Add unregister_validation_interface_race test (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
When a validationinterface has itself unregistered in one thread, but is about to get executed in another thread [1], there is a race:
* The validationinterface destructing itself
* The validationinterface getting dereferenced for execution
[1] 64139803f1/src/validationinterface.cpp (L82-L83)
This happens in the miner. More generally it happens everywhere where at least one thread is generating notifications and another one is unregistering a validationinterface.
This issue has been fixed in commit ab31b9d6fe, but the fix has not been applied to the miner.
Example where this happened in practice: https://travis-ci.org/github/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/675322230#L4414
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK 7777f2a4bb.
laanwj:
Code review ACK 7777f2a4bb
Tree-SHA512: 8087119243c71ba18a823a63515f3730d127162625d8729024278b447af29e2ff206f4840ee3d90bf84f93a2c5ab73b76c7e7044c83aa93b5b51047a166ec3d3
This commit is (intentionally) adding a broken test. The test is broken
because it registering a subscriber object that can go out of scope
while events are still being sent.
To run the broken test and reproduce the bug:
- Remove comment /** and */
- ./configure --with-sanitizers=address
- export ASAN_OPTIONS=detect_leaks=0
- make
- while ./src/test/test_bitcoin -t validationinterface_tests/unregister_validation_interface_race --catch_system_errors=no ; do true; done
