articles/bsd.md: update
This commit is contained in:
parent
0d7be13176
commit
da2a493490
1 changed files with 9 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -6,15 +6,22 @@ be considered a clean room implementation of Unix.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Compared to Linux, BSDs have managed to keep the bloat in check and a reasonable codebase.
|
Compared to Linux, BSDs have managed to keep the bloat in check and a reasonable codebase.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
{ I've yet to try a BSD, so anything written here (as of now) is from an "outsider" perspective, forgive any erroneous statements ~tocariimaa }
|
Unfortunately due to not being as popular as Linux, hardware support is lacking, even for old computers more than one thing is broken
|
||||||
|
(suspend-to-RAM, audio, Wireless cards...), so unless you run really old hardware (or just a computer that happens to work) BSDs are not
|
||||||
|
a very reasonable choice. For servers maybe, but note that BSD more insecure than Linux.
|
||||||
|
{ Installed FreeBSD on a thinkpad, resuming from suspension is broken and after installing
|
||||||
|
the graphics driver, the console just broke, now the installation is bricked LMAO. Now I get it, BSDs aren't mean for desktop usage
|
||||||
|
but for insecure servers :DDD ~tocariimaa }
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Main BSD distros
|
## Main BSD distros
|
||||||
- [FreeBSD](https://www.freebsd.org/): the most popular, quite "Linux-like", plans to drop support for 32 bit architectures.
|
- [FreeBSD](https://www.freebsd.org/): the most popular, quite "Linux-like", plans to drop support for 32 bit architectures.
|
||||||
- [NetBSD](https://netbsd.org/): focus on portability, main user of [pkgsrc](https://www.pkgsrc.org/),
|
- [NetBSD](https://netbsd.org/): focus on portability, main user of [pkgsrc](https://www.pkgsrc.org/),
|
||||||
supports [Lua](lua.md) in the kernel for driver prototyping and kernel configuration.
|
supports [Lua](lua.md) in the kernel for driver prototyping and kernel configuration.
|
||||||
- [OpenBSD](https://www.openbsd.org/): quite hysterical with "security features", but functional as its contributors actually daily drive it.
|
- [OpenBSD](https://www.openbsd.org/): quite hysterical with "security features", but functional as its contributors actually daily drive it (on thinkpads).
|
||||||
Was forked from NetBSD.
|
Was forked from NetBSD.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
No, MacOS is not a BSD. FreeBSD users, stop coping.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Historical BSDs
|
## Historical BSDs
|
||||||
- 386BSD: first version of BSD for IBM PC like computers. It was ready before Linux was released but due to legal issues with AT&T
|
- 386BSD: first version of BSD for IBM PC like computers. It was ready before Linux was released but due to legal issues with AT&T
|
||||||
it couldn't be released until 1992, a year later after Linux initial release. FreeBSD and NetBSD were forked from 386BSD.
|
it couldn't be released until 1992, a year later after Linux initial release. FreeBSD and NetBSD were forked from 386BSD.
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue