5736d1ddac tracing: pass if replaced by tx/pkg to tracepoint (0xb10c)
a4ec07f194 doc: add comments for CTxMemPool::ChangeSet (Suhas Daftuar)
83f814b1d1 Remove m_all_conflicts from SubPackageState (Suhas Daftuar)
d3c8e7dfb6 Ensure that we don't add duplicate transactions in rbf fuzz tests (Suhas Daftuar)
d7dc9fd2f7 Move CalculateChunksForRBF() to the mempool changeset (Suhas Daftuar)
284a1d33f1 Move prioritisation into changeset (Suhas Daftuar)
446b08b599 Don't distinguish between direct conflicts and all conflicts when doing cluster-size-2-rbf checks (Suhas Daftuar)
b53041021a Duplicate transactions are not permitted within a changeset (Suhas Daftuar)
b447416fdd Public mempool removal methods Assume() no changeset is outstanding (Suhas Daftuar)
2b30f4d36c Make RemoveStaged() private (Suhas Daftuar)
18829194ca Enforce that there is only one changeset at a time (Suhas Daftuar)
7fb62f7db6 Apply mempool changeset transactions directly into the mempool (Suhas Daftuar)
34b6c5833d Clean up FinalizeSubpackage to avoid workspace-specific information (Suhas Daftuar)
57983b8add Move LimitMempoolSize to take place outside FinalizeSubpackage (Suhas Daftuar)
01e145b975 Move changeset from workspace to subpackage (Suhas Daftuar)
802214c083 Introduce mempool changesets (Suhas Daftuar)
87d92fa340 test: Add unit test coverage of package rbf + prioritisetransaction (Suhas Daftuar)
15d982f91e Add package hash to package-rbf log message (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
part of cluster mempool: #30289
It became clear while working on cluster mempool that it would be helpful for transaction validation if we could consider a full set of proposed changes to the mempool -- consisting of a set of transactions to add, and a set of transactions (ie conflicts) to simultaneously remove -- and perform calculations on what the mempool would look like if the proposed changes were to be applied. Two specific examples of where we'd like to do this:
- Determining if ancestor/descendant/TRUC limits would be violated (in the future, cluster limits) if either a single transaction or a package of transactions were to be accepted
- Determining if an RBF would make the mempool "better", however that idea is defined, both in the single transaction and package of transaction cases
In preparation for cluster mempool, I have pulled this reworking of the mempool interface out of #28676 so it can be reviewed on its own. I have not re-implemented ancestor/descendant limits to be run through the changeset, since with cluster mempool those limits will be going away, so this seems like wasted effort. However, I have rebased #28676 on top of this branch so reviewers can see what the new mempool interface could look like in the cluster mempool setting.
There are some minor behavior changes here, which I believe are inconsequential:
- In the package validation setting, transactions would be added to the mempool before the `ConsensusScriptChecks()` are run. In theory, `ConsensusScriptChecks()` should always pass if the `PolicyScriptChecks()` have passed and it's just a belt-and-suspenders for us, but if somehow they were to diverge then there could be some small behavior change from adding transactions and then removing them, versus never adding them at all.
- The error reporting on `CheckConflictTopology()` has slightly changed due to no longer distinguishing between direct conflicts and indirect conflicts. I believe this should be entirely inconsequential because there shouldn't be a logical difference between those two ideas from the perspective of this function, but I did have to update some error strings in some tests.
- Because, in a package setting, RBFs now happen as part of the entire package being accepted, the logging has changed slightly because we do not know which transaction specifically evicted a given removed transaction.
- Specifically, the "package hash" is now used to reference the set of transactions that are being accepted, rather than any single txid. The log message relating to package RBF that happen in the `TXPACKAGES` category has been updated as well to include the package hash, so that it's possible to see which specific set of transactions are being referenced by that package hash.
- Relatedly, the tracepoint logging in the package rbf case has been updated as well to reference the package hash, rather than a transaction hash.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK 5736d1ddac
instagibbs:
ACK 5736d1ddac
ismaelsadeeq:
reACK 5736d1ddac
glozow:
ACK 5736d1ddac
Tree-SHA512: 21810872e082920d337c89ac406085aa71c5f8e5151ab07aedf41e6601f60a909b22fbf462ef3b735d5d5881e9b76142c53957158e674dd5dfe6f6aabbdf630b
The file test/functional/example_test.py is a heavily commented example
of a test case that uses both the RPC and P2P interfaces. If you are writing your first test, copy
that file and modify to fit your needs.
Coverage
Assuming the build directory is build,
running build/test/functional/test_runner.py with the --coverage argument tracks which RPCs are
called by the tests and prints a report of uncovered RPCs in the summary. This
can be used (along with the --extended argument) to find out which RPCs we
don't have test cases for.
Use a python linter like flake8 before submitting PRs to catch common style
nits (eg trailing whitespace, unused imports, etc)
The oldest supported Python version is specified in doc/dependencies.md.
Consider using pyenv, which checks .python-version,
to prevent accidentally introducing modern syntax from an unsupported Python version.
The CI linter job also checks this, but possibly not in all cases.
See the python lint script that checks for violations that
could lead to bugs and issues in the test code.
Use type hints in your code to improve code readability
and to detect possible bugs earlier.
Avoid wildcard imports.
If more than one name from a module is needed, use lexicographically sorted multi-line imports
in order to reduce the possibility of potential merge conflicts.
Use a module-level docstring to describe what the test is testing, and how it
is testing it.
When subclassing the BitcoinTestFramework, place overrides for the
set_test_params(), add_options() and setup_xxxx() methods at the top of
the subclass, then locally-defined helper methods, then the run_test() method.
Use f'{x}' for string formatting in preference to '{}'.format(x) or '%s' % x.
Use platform.system() for detecting the running operating system and os.name to
check whether it's a POSIX system (see also the skip_if_platform_not_{linux,posix}
methods in the BitcoinTestFramework class, which can be used to skip a whole test
depending on the platform).
Naming guidelines
Name the test <area>_test.py, where area can be one of the following:
feature for tests for full features that aren't wallet/mining/mempool, eg feature_rbf.py
interface for tests for other interfaces (REST, ZMQ, etc), eg interface_rest.py
mempool for tests for mempool behaviour, eg mempool_reorg.py
mining for tests for mining features, eg mining_prioritisetransaction.py
p2p for tests that explicitly test the p2p interface, eg p2p_disconnect_ban.py
rpc for tests for individual RPC methods or features, eg rpc_listtransactions.py
tool for tests for tools, eg tool_wallet.py
wallet for tests for wallet features, eg wallet_keypool.py
Use an underscore to separate words
exception: for tests for specific RPCs or command line options which don't include underscores, name the test after the exact RPC or argument name, eg rpc_decodescript.py, not rpc_decode_script.py
Don't use the redundant word test in the name, eg interface_zmq.py, not interface_zmq_test.py
General test-writing advice
Instead of inline comments or no test documentation at all, log the comments to the test log, e.g.
self.log.info('Create enough transactions to fill a block'). Logs make the test code easier to read and the test
logic easier to debug.
Set self.num_nodes to the minimum number of nodes necessary for the test.
Having additional unrequired nodes adds to the execution time of the test as
well as memory/CPU/disk requirements (which is important when running tests in
parallel).
Avoid stop-starting the nodes multiple times during the test if possible. A
stop-start takes several seconds, so doing it several times blows up the
runtime of the test.
Set the self.setup_clean_chain variable in set_test_params() to True to
initialize an empty blockchain and start from the Genesis block, rather than
load a premined blockchain from cache with the default value of False. The
cached data directories contain a 200-block pre-mined blockchain with the
spendable mining rewards being split between four nodes. Each node has 25
mature block subsidies (25x50=1250 BTC) in its wallet. Using them is much more
efficient than mining blocks in your test.
When calling RPCs with lots of arguments, consider using named keyword
arguments instead of positional arguments to make the intent of the call
clear to readers.
Many of the core test framework classes such as CBlock and CTransaction
don't allow new attributes to be added to their objects at runtime like
typical Python objects allow. This helps prevent unpredictable side effects
from typographical errors or usage of the objects outside of their intended
purpose.
RPC and P2P definitions
Test writers may find it helpful to refer to the definitions for the RPC and
P2P messages. These can be found in the following source files:
/src/rpc/* for RPCs
/src/wallet/rpc* for wallet RPCs
ProcessMessage() in /src/net_processing.cpp for parsing P2P messages
Using the P2P interface
P2Ps can be used to test specific P2P protocol behavior.
p2p.py contains test framework p2p objects and
messages.py contains all the definitions for objects passed
over the network (CBlock, CTransaction, etc, along with the network-level
wrappers for them, msg_block, msg_tx, etc).
P2P tests have two threads. One thread handles all network communication
with the bitcoind(s) being tested in a callback-based event loop; the other
implements the test logic.
P2PConnection is the class used to connect to a bitcoind. P2PInterface
contains the higher level logic for processing P2P payloads and connecting to
the Bitcoin Core node application logic. For custom behaviour, subclass the
P2PInterface object and override the callback methods.
They can also be referenced by indexing into a TestNode's p2ps list, which
contains the list of test framework p2p objects connected to itself
(it does not include any TestNodes):
The TestShell class exposes the BitcoinTestFramework
functionality to interactive Python3 environments and can be used to prototype
tests. This may be especially useful in a REPL environment with session logging
utilities, such as
IPython.
The logs of such interactive sessions can later be adapted into permanent test
cases.
Helper functions for creating blocks and transactions.
Benchmarking with perf
An easy way to profile node performance during functional tests is provided
for Linux platforms using perf.
Perf will sample the running node and will generate profile data in the node's
datadir. The profile data can then be presented using perf report or a graphical
tool like hotspot.
There are two ways of invoking perf: one is to use the --perf flag when
running tests, which will profile each node during the entire test run: perf
begins to profile when the node starts and ends when it shuts down. The other
way is the use the profile_with_perf context manager, e.g.
withnode.profile_with_perf("send-big-msgs"):# Perform activity on the node you're interested in profiling, e.g.:for_inrange(10000):node.p2ps[0].send_message(some_large_message)
To see useful textual output, run
perf report -i /path/to/datadir/send-big-msgs.perf.data.xxxx --stdio | c++filt | less