phantom/bitcoin
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git synced 2025-01-10 03:47:29 -03:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1
Bitcoin Core mirror and no, I don't give a fuck about Monero.
34900 commits 6 branches 321 tags 2.2 GiB
C++ 56.4%
C 22.8%
Python 17.5%
CMake 1%
Shell 0.8%
Other 1.2%
Find a file
MacroFake eeb5a94e27
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25528: ci: run USDT interface tests in the CI 
cc7335edc8 ci: run USDT interface test in a VM (0xb10c)
dba6f82342 test: adopt USDT utxocache interface tests (0xb10c)
220a5a2841 test: hook into PID in tracing tests (0xb10c)

Pull request description:

  Changes a CI task that runs test the previously not run `test/functional/interface_usdt_*.py` functional tests (added in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24358).

  This task is run as CirussCI `compute_engine_instance` VM as hooking into the tracepoints is not possible in CirrusCI docker containers (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/23296#issuecomment-1024920845). We use an unoffical PPA and untrusted  `bpfcc-tools` package in the CI as the Ubuntu jammy and Debian bullseye packages are outdated. We hope use an official package when new Ubuntu/Debian releases are available for the use with Google Compute Engine.

  We make sure to hook into `bitcoind` binaries in USDT interface tests via their PID, instead of their path. This makes sure multiple functional tests running in parallel don't interfere with each other.

  The utxocache USDT interface tests is adopted to a change of the functional test framework that wasn't detected as the tests weren't run in the CI. As the tracepoints expose internals, it can happen that we need to adopt the interface test when internals change. This is a bit awkward, and if it happens to frequently, we should consider generalizing the tests a bit more. For now it's fine, I think.

  See the individual commit messages for more details on the changes.

  Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/24782
  Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/23296

  I'd like to hear from reviewers:
  - Are we OK with using the [`hadret/bpfcc`](https://launchpad.net/~hadret/+archive/ubuntu/bpfcc) PPA for now? There is a clear plan when to drop it and as is currently, it could only impact the newly added VM task.
  - ~~Adding a new task increases CI runtime and costs. Should an existing `container` CI task be ported to a VM and reused instead?~~ Yes, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25528#issuecomment-1179509525

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    cr ACK cc7335edc8

Tree-SHA512: b7fddccc0a77d82371229d048abe0bf2c4ccaa45906497ef3040cf99e7f05561890aef4c253c40e4afc96bb838c9787fae81c8454c6fd9db583276e005a4ccb3
2022-08-01 11:27:29 +02:00
.github doc: Remove label from good first issue template 2020-08-24 09:31:24 +02:00
.tx qt: Update transifex resource blob to 23.0 2022-02-03 13:18:28 +01:00
build-aux/m4 build: Check for std::atomic::exchange rather than std::atomic_exchange 2022-07-18 10:47:19 -04:00
build_msvc build: Bump Qt to 5.15.5 in depends 2022-07-30 15:44:20 +01:00
ci Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25528: ci: run USDT interface tests in the CI 2022-08-01 11:27:29 +02:00
contrib guix: enable hardening options in GCC Build 2022-07-28 14:30:38 +01:00
depends qt: use patch over sed for guix CROSS_LIBRARY_PATH change 2022-07-30 16:03:46 +01:00
doc Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25610: wallet, rpc: Opt in to RBF by default 2022-08-01 10:53:11 +02:00
share doc: replace bitcoin.conf with placeholder file 2022-05-02 15:38:07 +02:00
src Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25651: refactor: make all NodeImpl/ChainImpl/ExternalSignerImpl members public, rm temporaries, simplify 2022-08-01 11:19:55 +02:00
test Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25528: ci: run USDT interface tests in the CI 2022-08-01 11:27:29 +02:00
.cirrus.yml Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25528: ci: run USDT interface tests in the CI 2022-08-01 11:27:29 +02:00
.editorconfig ci: Drop AppVeyor CI integration 2021-09-07 06:12:53 +03:00
.gitattributes Separate protocol versioning from clientversion 2014-10-29 00:24:40 -04:00
.gitignore refactor: cleanups post unsubtree'ing univalue 2022-06-15 12:56:44 +01:00
.python-version Bump minimum python version to 3.6 2020-11-09 17:53:47 +10:00
.style.yapf test: .style.yapf: Set column_limit=160 2019-03-04 18:28:13 -05:00
autogen.sh scripted-diff: Bump copyright of files changed in 2019 2019-12-30 10:42:20 +13:00
configure.ac Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25630: Add symlinks for hardcoded Makefiles in out of tree builds 2022-07-19 16:38:36 +01:00
CONTRIBUTING.md doc: Explain squashing with merge commits 2022-05-24 08:17:41 +02:00
COPYING doc: Update license year range to 2022 2022-01-03 04:48:41 +08:00
INSTALL.md doc: Added hyperlink for doc/build 2021-09-09 19:53:12 +05:30
libbitcoinconsensus.pc.in build: remove libcrypto as internal dependency in libbitcoinconsensus.pc 2019-11-19 15:03:44 +01:00
Makefile.am refactor: cleanups post unsubtree'ing univalue 2022-06-15 12:56:44 +01:00
README.md doc: Explain Bitcoin Core in README.md 2022-05-10 07:49:09 +02:00
REVIEWERS test: port 'lint-shell.sh' to python 2022-05-05 08:44:08 -05:00
SECURITY.md doc: Suggest keys.openpgp.org as keyserver in SECURITY.md 2021-11-08 12:22:04 +01:00

README.md

Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree

https://bitcoincore.org

For an immediately usable, binary version of the Bitcoin Core software, see https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/.

What is Bitcoin Core?

Bitcoin Core connects to the Bitcoin peer-to-peer network to download and fully validate blocks and transactions. It also includes a wallet and graphical user interface, which can be optionally built.

Further information about Bitcoin Core is available in the doc folder.

License

Bitcoin Core is released under the terms of the MIT license. See COPYING for more information or see https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT.

Development Process

The master branch is regularly built (see doc/build-*.md for instructions) and tested, but it is not guaranteed to be completely stable. Tags are created regularly from release branches to indicate new official, stable release versions of Bitcoin Core.

The https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui repository is used exclusively for the development of the GUI. Its master branch is identical in all monotree repositories. Release branches and tags do not exist, so please do not fork that repository unless it is for development reasons.

The contribution workflow is described in CONTRIBUTING.md and useful hints for developers can be found in doc/developer-notes.md.

Testing

Testing and code review is the bottleneck for development; we get more pull requests than we can review and test on short notice. Please be patient and help out by testing other people's pull requests, and remember this is a security-critical project where any mistake might cost people lots of money.

Automated Testing

Developers are strongly encouraged to write unit tests for new code, and to submit new unit tests for old code. Unit tests can be compiled and run (assuming they weren't disabled in configure) with: make check. Further details on running and extending unit tests can be found in /src/test/README.md.

There are also regression and integration tests, written in Python. These tests can be run (if the test dependencies are installed) with: test/functional/test_runner.py

The CI (Continuous Integration) systems make sure that every pull request is built for Windows, Linux, and macOS, and that unit/sanity tests are run automatically.

Manual Quality Assurance (QA) Testing

Changes should be tested by somebody other than the developer who wrote the code. This is especially important for large or high-risk changes. It is useful to add a test plan to the pull request description if testing the changes is not straightforward.

Translations

Changes to translations as well as new translations can be submitted to Bitcoin Core's Transifex page.

Translations are periodically pulled from Transifex and merged into the git repository. See the translation process for details on how this works.

Important: We do not accept translation changes as GitHub pull requests because the next pull from Transifex would automatically overwrite them again.