phantom/bitcoin
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git synced 2025-04-29 14:59:39 -04:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1
Bitcoin Core mirror and no, I don't give a fuck about Monero.
43862 commits 7 branches 325 tags 2.4 GiB
Find a file
glozow 96d30ed4f9
Some checks are pending
CI / test each commit (push) Waiting to run
Details
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, no depends, sqlite only, gui (push) Waiting to run
Details
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, fuzz (push) Waiting to run
Details
CI / Win64 native, VS 2022 (push) Waiting to run
Details
CI / Win64 native fuzz, VS 2022 (push) Waiting to run
Details
CI / ASan + LSan + UBSan + integer, no depends, USDT (push) Waiting to run
Details
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#31495: wallet: Utilize IsMine() and CanProvide() in migration to cover edge cases 
af76664b12 test: Test migration of a solvable script with no privkeys (Ava Chow)
17f01b0795 test: Test migration of taproot output scripts (Ava Chow)
1eb9a2a39f test: Test migration of miniscript in legacy wallets (Ava Chow)
e8c3efc7d8 wallet migration: Determine Solvables with CanProvide (Ava Chow)
fa1b7cd6e2 migration: Skip descriptors which do not parse (Ava Chow)
440ea1ab63 legacy spkm: use IsMine() to extract watched output scripts (Ava Chow)
b777e84cd7 legacy spkm: Move CanProvide to LegacyDataSPKM (Ava Chow)
b1ab927bbf tests: Test migration of additional P2WSH scripts (Ava Chow)
c39b3cfcd1 test: Extra verification that migratewallet migrates (Ava Chow)

Pull request description:

  The legacy wallet `IsMine()` is essentially a black box that would tell us whether the wallet is watching an output script. In order to migrate legacy wallets to descriptor wallets, we need to be able to compute all of the output scripts that a legacy wallet would watch. The original approach for this was to understand `IsMine()` and write a function which would be its inverse. This was partially done in the original migration code, and attempted to be completed in #30328. However, further analysis of `IsMine()` has continued to reveal additional edge cases which make writing an inverse function increasingly difficult to verify correctness.

  This PR instead changes migration to utilize `IsMine()` to produce the output scripts by first computing a superset of all of the output scripts that `IsMine()` would watch and testing each script against `IsMine()` to filter for the ones that actually are watched. The superset is constructed by computing all possible output scripts for the keys and scripts in the wallet - for keys, every key could be a P2PK, P2PKH, P2WPKH, and P2SH-P2WPKH; for scripts, every script could be an output script, the redeemScript of a P2SH, the witnessScript of a P2WSH, and the witnessScript of a P2SH-P2WSH.

  Additionally, the legacy wallet can contain scripts that are redeemScripts and witnessScripts, while not watching for any output script utilizing that script. These are known as solvable scripts and are migrated to a separate "solvables" wallet. The previous approach to identifying these solvables was similar to identifying output scripts - finding known solvable conditions and computing the scripts. However, this also can miss scripts, so the solvables are now identified in a manner similar to the output scripts but using the function `CanProvide()`. Using the same superset as before, all output scripts which are `ISMINE_NO` are put through `CanProvide()` which will perform a dummy signing and then a key lookup to determine whether the legacy wallet could provide any solving data for the output script. The scripts that pass will have their descriptors inferred and the script included in the solvables wallet.

  The main downside of this approach is that `IsMine()` and `CanProvide()` can no longer be deleted. They will need to be refactored to be migration only code instead in #28710.

  Lastly, I've added 2 test cases for the edge cases that prompted this change of approach. In particular, miniscript witnessScripts and `rawtr()` output scripts are  solvable and signable in a legacy wallet, although never `ISMINE_SPENDABLE`.

ACKs for top commit:
  sipa:
    Code review ACK af76664b12d8611b606a7e755a103a20542ee539; I did not review the tests in detail.
  brunoerg:
    code review ACK af76664b12
  rkrux:
    ACK af76664b12

Tree-SHA512: 7f58a90de6f38fe9801fb6c2a520627072c8d66358652ad0872ff59deb678a82664b99babcfd874288bebcb1487d099a77821f03ae063c2b4cbf2d316e77d141
2025-02-13 12:30:15 -05:00
.github Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#31428: ci: Allow build dir on CI host 2025-01-30 19:34:00 -05:00
.tx Update Transifex slug for 29.x 2025-02-06 09:38:49 +00:00
ci Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#31678: ci: Skip read-write of default env vars 2025-02-12 15:54:16 +01:00
cmake Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#31722: cmake: Copy cov_tool_wrapper.sh.in to the build tree 2025-02-13 10:34:28 +01:00
contrib guix: remove test-security/symbol-check scripts 2025-02-10 11:12:33 +01:00
depends Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#31840: depends: add missing Darwin objcopy 2025-02-12 18:50:58 +01:00
doc Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#31767: logging: Ensure -debug=0/none behaves consistently with -nodebug 2025-02-13 08:40:12 -05:00
share build: Rename PACKAGE_* variables to CLIENT_* 2024-10-28 12:35:55 +00:00
src Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#31495: wallet: Utilize IsMine() and CanProvide() in migration to cover edge cases 2025-02-13 12:30:15 -05:00
test Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#31495: wallet: Utilize IsMine() and CanProvide() in migration to cover edge cases 2025-02-13 12:30:15 -05:00
.cirrus.yml ci: Bump fuzz task timeout 2025-02-06 22:21:48 +01:00
.editorconfig code style: update .editorconfig file 2024-09-13 17:55:10 +02:00
.gitattributes Separate protocol versioning from clientversion 2014-10-29 00:24:40 -04:00
.gitignore build: Remove Autotools-based build system 2024-08-30 21:31:39 +01:00
.python-version Bump python minimum supported version to 3.10 2024-08-28 15:53:07 +02:00
.style.yapf Update .style.yapf 2023-06-01 23:35:10 +05:30
CMakeLists.txt Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#31722: cmake: Copy cov_tool_wrapper.sh.in to the build tree 2025-02-13 10:34:28 +01:00
CMakePresets.json cmake: Remove unused BUILD_TESTING variable from "dev-mode" preset 2024-12-19 22:25:11 +00:00
CONTRIBUTING.md doc: remove PR Review Club frequency 2024-11-20 11:16:39 +01:00
COPYING doc: upgrade license to 2025. 2025-01-06 12:23:11 +00:00
INSTALL.md doc: Added hyperlink for doc/build 2021-09-09 19:53:12 +05:30
libbitcoinkernel.pc.in build: use CLIENT_NAME in libbitcoinkernel.pc.in 2025-02-07 16:11:48 +00:00
README.md doc: cmake: prepend and explain "build/" where needed 2024-10-11 11:24:21 -06:00
SECURITY.md Update security.md contact for achow101 2023-12-14 18:14:54 -05:00
vcpkg.json Remove wallet::ParseISO8601DateTime, use ParseISO8601DateTime instead 2024-12-02 15:09:31 +01:00

README.md

Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree

https://bitcoincore.org

For an immediately usable, binary version of the Bitcoin Core software, see https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/.

What is Bitcoin Core?

Bitcoin Core connects to the Bitcoin peer-to-peer network to download and fully validate blocks and transactions. It also includes a wallet and graphical user interface, which can be optionally built.

Further information about Bitcoin Core is available in the doc folder.

License

Bitcoin Core is released under the terms of the MIT license. See COPYING for more information or see https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT.

Development Process

The master branch is regularly built (see doc/build-*.md for instructions) and tested, but it is not guaranteed to be completely stable. Tags are created regularly from release branches to indicate new official, stable release versions of Bitcoin Core.

The https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui repository is used exclusively for the development of the GUI. Its master branch is identical in all monotree repositories. Release branches and tags do not exist, so please do not fork that repository unless it is for development reasons.

The contribution workflow is described in CONTRIBUTING.md and useful hints for developers can be found in doc/developer-notes.md.

Testing

Testing and code review is the bottleneck for development; we get more pull requests than we can review and test on short notice. Please be patient and help out by testing other people's pull requests, and remember this is a security-critical project where any mistake might cost people lots of money.

Automated Testing

Developers are strongly encouraged to write unit tests for new code, and to submit new unit tests for old code. Unit tests can be compiled and run (assuming they weren't disabled during the generation of the build system) with: ctest. Further details on running and extending unit tests can be found in /src/test/README.md.

There are also regression and integration tests, written in Python. These tests can be run (if the test dependencies are installed) with: build/test/functional/test_runner.py (assuming build is your build directory).

The CI (Continuous Integration) systems make sure that every pull request is built for Windows, Linux, and macOS, and that unit/sanity tests are run automatically.

Manual Quality Assurance (QA) Testing

Changes should be tested by somebody other than the developer who wrote the code. This is especially important for large or high-risk changes. It is useful to add a test plan to the pull request description if testing the changes is not straightforward.

Translations

Changes to translations as well as new translations can be submitted to Bitcoin Core's Transifex page.

Translations are periodically pulled from Transifex and merged into the git repository. See the translation process for details on how this works.

Important: We do not accept translation changes as GitHub pull requests because the next pull from Transifex would automatically overwrite them again.