61f4b9b7ad
Exceptions are not propagated in ctype callback functions used by bcc. This means an AssertionError exception raised by check_equal() to signal a failed assertion is not getting caught and properly logged. Instead, the error is logged to stdout and execution of the handler stops. The current workaround to check whether all check_equal() assertions in a callback succeeded is to increment a success counter after the assertions (which only gets incremented if none exception is raised and stops execution). Then, outside the callback, the success counter can be used to check whether a callback executed successfully. One issue with the described workaround is that when an exception occurs, there is no way of telling which of the check_equal() statements caused the exception; moreover, there is no way of inspecting how the pieces of data that got compared in check_equal() differed (often a crucial clue when debugging what went wrong). Two fixes to this problem come to mind. The first involves having the callback function make event data accessible outside the callback and inspecting the event using check_equal() outside the callback. This solution still requires a counter in the callback to tell whether a callback was actually executed or if instead the call to perf_buffer_poll() timed out. The second fix entails wrapping all relevant check_equal() statements inside callback functions into try-catch blocks and manually logging AssertionErrors. While not as elegant in terms of design, this approach can be more pragmatic for more complex tests (e.g., ones involving multiple events, events of different types, or the order of events). The solution proposed here is to select the most pragmatic fix on a case-by-case basis: Tests in interface_usdt_net.py, interface_usdt_mempool.py and interface_usdt_validation.py have been refactored to use the first approach, while the second approach was chosen for interface_usdt_utxocache.py (partly to provide a reference for the second approach, but mainly because the utxocache tests are the most intricate tests, and refactoring them to use the first approach would negatively impact their readability). Lastly, interface_usdt_coinselection.py was kept unchanged because it does not use check_equal() statements inside callback functions. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .github | ||
| .tx | ||
| build-aux/m4 | ||
| build_msvc | ||
| ci | ||
| contrib | ||
| depends | ||
| doc | ||
| share | ||
| src | ||
| test | ||
| .cirrus.yml | ||
| .editorconfig | ||
| .gitattributes | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| .python-version | ||
| .style.yapf | ||
| autogen.sh | ||
| configure.ac | ||
| CONTRIBUTING.md | ||
| COPYING | ||
| INSTALL.md | ||
| libbitcoinconsensus.pc.in | ||
| Makefile.am | ||
| README.md | ||
| SECURITY.md | ||
Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree
For an immediately usable, binary version of the Bitcoin Core software, see https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/.
What is Bitcoin Core?
Bitcoin Core connects to the Bitcoin peer-to-peer network to download and fully validate blocks and transactions. It also includes a wallet and graphical user interface, which can be optionally built.
Further information about Bitcoin Core is available in the doc folder.
License
Bitcoin Core is released under the terms of the MIT license. See COPYING for more information or see https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT.
Development Process
The master branch is regularly built (see doc/build-*.md for instructions) and tested, but it is not guaranteed to be
completely stable. Tags are created
regularly from release branches to indicate new official, stable release versions of Bitcoin Core.
The https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui repository is used exclusively for the development of the GUI. Its master branch is identical in all monotree repositories. Release branches and tags do not exist, so please do not fork that repository unless it is for development reasons.
The contribution workflow is described in CONTRIBUTING.md and useful hints for developers can be found in doc/developer-notes.md.
Testing
Testing and code review is the bottleneck for development; we get more pull requests than we can review and test on short notice. Please be patient and help out by testing other people's pull requests, and remember this is a security-critical project where any mistake might cost people lots of money.
Automated Testing
Developers are strongly encouraged to write unit tests for new code, and to
submit new unit tests for old code. Unit tests can be compiled and run
(assuming they weren't disabled in configure) with: make check. Further details on running
and extending unit tests can be found in /src/test/README.md.
There are also regression and integration tests, written
in Python.
These tests can be run (if the test dependencies are installed) with: test/functional/test_runner.py
The CI (Continuous Integration) systems make sure that every pull request is built for Windows, Linux, and macOS, and that unit/sanity tests are run automatically.
Manual Quality Assurance (QA) Testing
Changes should be tested by somebody other than the developer who wrote the code. This is especially important for large or high-risk changes. It is useful to add a test plan to the pull request description if testing the changes is not straightforward.
Translations
Changes to translations as well as new translations can be submitted to Bitcoin Core's Transifex page.
Translations are periodically pulled from Transifex and merged into the git repository. See the translation process for details on how this works.
Important: We do not accept translation changes as GitHub pull requests because the next pull from Transifex would automatically overwrite them again.