phantom/bitcoin
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git synced 2025-01-09 11:27:28 -03:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1
Bitcoin Core mirror and no, I don't give a fuck about Monero.
43138 commits 6 branches 321 tags 2.2 GiB
C++ 56.4%
C 22.9%
Python 17.5%
CMake 1%
Shell 0.8%
Other 1.1%
Find a file
Ava Chow 2666d83da5
Some checks are pending
CI / test each commit (push) Waiting to run
Details
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, no depends, sqlite only, gui (push) Waiting to run
Details
CI / Win64 native, VS 2022 (push) Waiting to run
Details
CI / ASan + LSan + UBSan + integer, no depends, USDT (push) Waiting to run
Details
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30893: test: Introduce ensure_for helper 
111465d72d test: Remove unused attempts parameter from wait_until (Fabian Jahr)
5468a23eb9 test: Add check_interval parameter to wait_until (Fabian Jahr)
16c87d91fd test: Introduce ensure_for helper (Fabian Jahr)

Pull request description:

  A repeating pattern in the functional tests is that the test sleeps for a while to ensure that a certain condition is still true after some amount of time has elapsed. Most recently a new case of this was added in #30807. This PR here introduces an `ensure` helper to streamline this functionality.

  Some approach considerations:
  - It is possible to construct this by reusing `wait_until` and wrapping it in `try` internally. However, the logger output of the failing wait would still be printed which seems irritating. So I opted for simplified but similar internals to `wait_until`.
  - This implementation starts for a failure in the condition right away which has the nice side-effect that it might give feedback on a failure earlier than is currently the case. However, in some cases, it may be expected that the condition may still be false at the beginning and then turns true until time has run out, something that would work when the test sleeps without checking in a loop. I decided against this design (and even against adding it as an option) because such a test design seems like it would be racy either way.
  - I have also been going back and forth on naming. To me `ensure` works well but I am also not a native speaker, happy consider a different name if others don't think it's clear enough.

ACKs for top commit:
  maflcko:
    re-ACK 111465d72d 🍋
  achow101:
    ACK 111465d72d
  tdb3:
    code review re ACK 111465d72d
  furszy:
    utACK 111465d72d

Tree-SHA512: ce01a4f3531995375a6fbf01b27d51daa9d4c3d7cd10381be6e86ec5925d2965861000f7cb4796b8d40aabe3b64c4c27e2811270e4e3c9916689575b8ba4a2aa
2024-11-19 13:56:20 -05:00
.github ci: skip Github CI on branch pushes for forks 2024-11-12 12:14:34 +01:00
.tx qt: Bump Transifex slug for 28.x 2024-07-30 16:14:19 +01:00
ci ci: remove util-linux from centos CI 2024-11-13 15:51:45 +00:00
cmake Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#31181: cmake: Revamp FindLibevent module 2024-11-11 15:31:58 +00:00
contrib guix: remove util-linux 2024-11-13 15:51:17 +00:00
depends Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#31181: cmake: Revamp FindLibevent module 2024-11-11 15:31:58 +00:00
doc Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#31225: doc: Fix grammatical errors in multisig-tutorial.md 2024-11-14 10:25:58 +00:00
share build: Rename PACKAGE_* variables to CLIENT_* 2024-10-28 12:35:55 +00:00
src build: Temporarily disable compiling fuzz/utxo_snapshot.cpp with MSVC 2024-11-17 16:52:42 +00:00
test Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30893: test: Introduce ensure_for helper 2024-11-19 13:56:20 -05:00
.cirrus.yml Squashed 'src/secp256k1/' changes from 2f2ccc46954..0cdc758a563 2024-11-04 14:59:46 -05:00
.editorconfig code style: update .editorconfig file 2024-09-13 17:55:10 +02:00
.gitattributes Separate protocol versioning from clientversion 2014-10-29 00:24:40 -04:00
.gitignore Squashed 'src/secp256k1/' changes from 2f2ccc46954..0cdc758a563 2024-11-04 14:59:46 -05:00
.python-version Bump python minimum supported version to 3.10 2024-08-28 15:53:07 +02:00
.style.yapf Update .style.yapf 2023-06-01 23:35:10 +05:30
CMakeLists.txt Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#31173: cmake: Add FindQRencode module and enable libqrencode package for MSVC 2024-11-06 12:11:39 +00:00
CMakePresets.json build, msvc: Enable libqrencode vcpkg package 2024-11-05 16:38:56 +00:00
CONTRIBUTING.md doc: replace Autotools with CMake 2024-08-29 16:06:29 +01:00
COPYING doc: upgrade Bitcoin Core license to 2024 2024-01-10 16:29:01 -06:00
INSTALL.md doc: Added hyperlink for doc/build 2021-09-09 19:53:12 +05:30
libbitcoinkernel.pc.in build: Rename PACKAGE_* variables to CLIENT_* 2024-10-28 12:35:55 +00:00
README.md Squashed 'src/secp256k1/' changes from 2f2ccc46954..0cdc758a563 2024-11-04 14:59:46 -05:00
SECURITY.md Update security.md contact for achow101 2023-12-14 18:14:54 -05:00
vcpkg.json build, msvc: Enable libqrencode vcpkg package 2024-11-05 16:38:56 +00:00

README.md

Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree

https://bitcoincore.org

For an immediately usable, binary version of the Bitcoin Core software, see https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/.

What is Bitcoin Core?

Bitcoin Core connects to the Bitcoin peer-to-peer network to download and fully validate blocks and transactions. It also includes a wallet and graphical user interface, which can be optionally built.

Further information about Bitcoin Core is available in the doc folder.

License

Bitcoin Core is released under the terms of the MIT license. See COPYING for more information or see https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT.

Development Process

The master branch is regularly built (see doc/build-*.md for instructions) and tested, but it is not guaranteed to be completely stable. Tags are created regularly from release branches to indicate new official, stable release versions of Bitcoin Core.

The https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui repository is used exclusively for the development of the GUI. Its master branch is identical in all monotree repositories. Release branches and tags do not exist, so please do not fork that repository unless it is for development reasons.

The contribution workflow is described in CONTRIBUTING.md and useful hints for developers can be found in doc/developer-notes.md.

Testing

Testing and code review is the bottleneck for development; we get more pull requests than we can review and test on short notice. Please be patient and help out by testing other people's pull requests, and remember this is a security-critical project where any mistake might cost people lots of money.

Automated Testing

Developers are strongly encouraged to write unit tests for new code, and to submit new unit tests for old code. Unit tests can be compiled and run (assuming they weren't disabled during the generation of the build system) with: ctest. Further details on running and extending unit tests can be found in /src/test/README.md.

There are also regression and integration tests, written in Python. These tests can be run (if the test dependencies are installed) with: build/test/functional/test_runner.py (assuming build is your build directory).

The CI (Continuous Integration) systems make sure that every pull request is built for Windows, Linux, and macOS, and that unit/sanity tests are run automatically.

Manual Quality Assurance (QA) Testing

Changes should be tested by somebody other than the developer who wrote the code. This is especially important for large or high-risk changes. It is useful to add a test plan to the pull request description if testing the changes is not straightforward.

Translations

Changes to translations as well as new translations can be submitted to Bitcoin Core's Transifex page.

Translations are periodically pulled from Transifex and merged into the git repository. See the translation process for details on how this works.

Important: We do not accept translation changes as GitHub pull requests because the next pull from Transifex would automatically overwrite them again.