Bitcoin Core mirror and no, I don't give a fuck about Monero.
Find a file
Wladimir J. van der Laan 01fc5891fb
Merge #16702: p2p: supplying and using asmap to improve IP bucketing in addrman
3c1bc40205 Add extra logging of asmap use and bucketing (Gleb Naumenko)
e4658aa8ea Return mapped AS in RPC call getpeerinfo (Gleb Naumenko)
ec45646de9 Integrate ASN bucketing in Addrman and add tests (Gleb Naumenko)
8feb4e4b66  Add asmap utility which queries a mapping (Gleb Naumenko)

Pull request description:

  This PR attempts to solve the problem explained in #16599.
  A particular attack which encouraged us to work on this issue is explained here  [[Erebus Attack against Bitcoin Peer-to-Peer Network](https://erebus-attack.comp.nus.edu.sg/)] (by @muoitranduc)

  Instead of relying on /16 prefix to diversify the connections every node creates, we would instead rely on the (ip -> ASN) mapping, if this mapping is provided.

  A .map file can be created by every user independently based on a router dump, or provided along with the Bitcoin release. Currently we use the python scripts written by @sipa to create a .map file, which is no larger than 2MB (awesome!).

  Here I suggest adding a field to peers.dat which would represent a hash of asmap file used while serializing addrman (or 0 for /16 prefix legacy approach).
  In this case, every time the file is updated (or grouping method changed), all buckets will be re-computed.
  I believe that alternative selective re-bucketing for only updated ranges would require substantial changes.

  TODO:
  - ~~more unit tests~~
  - ~~find a way to test the code without including >1 MB mapping file in the repo.~~
  - find a way to check that mapping file is not corrupted (checksum?)
  - comments and separate tests for asmap.cpp
  - make python code for .map generation public
  - figure out asmap distribution (?)

  ~Interesting corner case: I’m using std::hash to compute a fingerprint of asmap, and std::hash returns size_t. I guess  if a user updates the OS to 64-bit, then the hash of asap will change? Does it even matter?~

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    re-ACK 3c1bc40205
  jamesob:
    ACK 3c1bc40205 ([`jamesob/ackr/16702.3.naumenkogs.p2p_supplying_and_using`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/16702.3.naumenkogs.p2p_supplying_and_using))
  jonatack:
    ACK 3c1bc40205

Tree-SHA512: e2dc6171188d5cdc2ab2c022fa49ed73a14a0acb8ae4c5ffa970172a0365942a249ad3d57e5fb134bc156a3492662c983f74bd21e78d316629dcadf71576800c
2020-01-29 13:55:43 +01:00
.github ci: Update vcpkg cache on MSBuild update 2019-12-23 20:05:18 +02:00
.tx gui: Update transifex slug for 0.19 2019-09-02 13:40:01 +02:00
build-aux/m4 Merge #16110: depends: Add Android NDK support 2019-11-04 13:32:19 +01:00
build_msvc build: remove configure checks for win libraries we don't link against 2020-01-23 07:59:54 +08:00
ci Merge #17767: ci: Fix qemu issues 2020-01-22 21:09:13 +01:00
contrib Merge #18010: test: rename test suite name "tx_validationcache_tests" to match filename 2020-01-28 18:25:54 +08:00
depends depends: Consistent use of package variable 2020-01-16 13:23:02 +00:00
doc Merge #17819: doc: developer notes guideline on RPCExamples addresses 2020-01-16 15:23:40 -05:00
share scripted-diff: Bump copyright of files changed in 2019 2019-12-30 10:42:20 +13:00
src Merge #16702: p2p: supplying and using asmap to improve IP bucketing in addrman 2020-01-29 13:55:43 +01:00
test Merge #17156: psbt: check that various indexes and amounts are within bounds 2020-01-29 19:39:50 +08:00
.appveyor.yml Updated appveyor job to checkout a specific vcpkg commit ID. 2020-01-25 19:07:03 +00:00
.cirrus.yml ci: remove OpenSSL installation 2019-11-18 08:56:48 -05:00
.gitattributes Separate protocol versioning from clientversion 2014-10-29 00:24:40 -04:00
.gitignore Merge #17452: test: update fuzz directory in .gitignore 2020-01-08 06:47:18 +08:00
.python-version .python-version: Specify full version 3.5.6 2019-03-02 12:06:26 -05:00
.style.yapf test: .style.yapf: Set column_limit=160 2019-03-04 18:28:13 -05:00
.travis.yml Merge #17767: ci: Fix qemu issues 2020-01-22 21:09:13 +01:00
autogen.sh scripted-diff: Bump copyright of files changed in 2019 2019-12-30 10:42:20 +13:00
configure.ac build: remove configure checks for win libraries we don't link against 2020-01-23 07:59:54 +08:00
CONTRIBUTING.md Merge #17688: doc: Add "ci" prefix to CONTRIBUTING.md 2020-01-04 14:28:24 +08:00
COPYING doc: Update license year range to 2020 2019-12-26 23:11:21 +01:00
INSTALL.md Update INSTALL landing redirection notice for build instructions. 2016-10-06 12:27:23 +13:00
libbitcoinconsensus.pc.in build: remove libcrypto as internal dependency in libbitcoinconsensus.pc 2019-11-19 15:03:44 +01:00
Makefile.am build: remove WINDOWS_BITS from build system 2019-12-16 13:12:29 -05:00
README.md doc: Fix some misspellings 2019-11-04 04:22:53 -05:00
SECURITY.md doc: Remove explicit mention of version from SECURITY.md 2019-06-14 06:39:17 -04:00

Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree

https://bitcoincore.org

What is Bitcoin?

Bitcoin is an experimental digital currency that enables instant payments to anyone, anywhere in the world. Bitcoin uses peer-to-peer technology to operate with no central authority: managing transactions and issuing money are carried out collectively by the network. Bitcoin Core is the name of open source software which enables the use of this currency.

For more information, as well as an immediately usable, binary version of the Bitcoin Core software, see https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/, or read the original whitepaper.

License

Bitcoin Core is released under the terms of the MIT license. See COPYING for more information or see https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT.

Development Process

The master branch is regularly built and tested, but is not guaranteed to be completely stable. Tags are created regularly to indicate new official, stable release versions of Bitcoin Core.

The contribution workflow is described in CONTRIBUTING.md and useful hints for developers can be found in doc/developer-notes.md.

Testing

Testing and code review is the bottleneck for development; we get more pull requests than we can review and test on short notice. Please be patient and help out by testing other people's pull requests, and remember this is a security-critical project where any mistake might cost people lots of money.

Automated Testing

Developers are strongly encouraged to write unit tests for new code, and to submit new unit tests for old code. Unit tests can be compiled and run (assuming they weren't disabled in configure) with: make check. Further details on running and extending unit tests can be found in /src/test/README.md.

There are also regression and integration tests, written in Python, that are run automatically on the build server. These tests can be run (if the test dependencies are installed) with: test/functional/test_runner.py

The Travis CI system makes sure that every pull request is built for Windows, Linux, and macOS, and that unit/sanity tests are run automatically.

Manual Quality Assurance (QA) Testing

Changes should be tested by somebody other than the developer who wrote the code. This is especially important for large or high-risk changes. It is useful to add a test plan to the pull request description if testing the changes is not straightforward.

Translations

Changes to translations as well as new translations can be submitted to Bitcoin Core's Transifex page.

Translations are periodically pulled from Transifex and merged into the git repository. See the translation process for details on how this works.

Important: We do not accept translation changes as GitHub pull requests because the next pull from Transifex would automatically overwrite them again.

Translators should also subscribe to the mailing list.