daa5a658c0 refactor: rename BCLog::BLOCKSTORE to BLOCKSTORAGE (Jon Atack)
cf622b214b doc: release note re raising on invalid -debug/debugexclude/loglevel (Jon Atack)
6cb1c66041 init: remove config option names from translated -loglevel strings (Jon Atack)
2547829272 test: -loglevel raises on invalid values (Jon Atack)
a9c295888b init: raise on invalid loglevel config option (Jon Atack)
b0c3995393 test: -debug and -debugexclude raise on invalid values (Jon Atack)
4c3c19d943 init: raise on invalid debug/debugexclude config options (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
and rename BCLog::BLOCKSTORE to BLOCKSTORAGE so the enum is the same as its value like the other BCLog enums.
Per discussion in bitcoin-core-dev IRC today from https://bitcoin-irc.chaincode.com/bitcoin-core-dev/2023-05-11#921458.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK daa5a658c0
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK daa5a658c0. Just translated string template cleanup since last review
pinheadmz:
re-ACK daa5a658c0
Tree-SHA512: 4c107a93d8e8ce4e2ee81d44aec672526ca354ec390b241221067f68204beac8b4ba7a65748bcfa124ff2245c4307fa9243ec4fe0b464d0fa69c787fb322c3cc
5524fa00fa doc: add release note about removal of `deprecatedrpc=walletwarningfield` flag (Sebastian Falbesoner)
5c77db7354 Restorewallet/createwallet help documentation fixups/improvements (Jon Atack)
a00ae31fcc rpc: remove deprecated "warning" field from {create,load,restore,unload}wallet (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
The "warning" string field for wallet creating/loading RPCs (`createwallet`, `loadwallet`, `unloadwallet` and `restorewallet`) has been deprecated with the configuration option `-deprecatedrpc=walletwarningfield` in PR #27279 (released in v25.0). For the next release v26.0, the field and the configuration option can be removed.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 5524fa00fa
jonatack:
ACK 5524fa00fa
Tree-SHA512: 8212f72067d08095304018b8a95d2ebef630004b65123483fbbfb078cc5709c2d825bbc35b16ea5f6b28ae7377347382d7e9afaf7bdbf0575d2c229d970784de
67b7fecacd [mempool] clear mapDeltas entry if prioritisetransaction sets delta to 0 (glozow)
c1061acb9d [functional test] prioritisation is not removed during replacement and expiry (glozow)
0e5874f0b0 [functional test] getprioritisedtransactions RPC (glozow)
99f8046829 [rpc] add getprioritisedtransactions (glozow)
9e9ca36c80 [mempool] add GetPrioritisedTransactions (glozow)
Pull request description:
Add an RPC to get prioritised transactions (also tells you whether the tx is in mempool or not), helping users clean up `mapDeltas` manually. When `CTxMemPool::PrioritiseTransaction` sets a delta to 0, remove the entry from `mapDeltas`.
Motivation / Background
- `mapDeltas` entries are never removed from mapDeltas except when the tx is mined in a block or conflicted.
- Mostly it is a feature to allow `prioritisetransaction` for a tx that isn't in the mempool {yet, anymore}. A user can may resbumit a tx and it retains its priority, or mark a tx as "definitely accept" before it is seen.
- Since #8448, `mapDeltas` is persisted to mempool.dat and loaded on restart. This is also good, otherwise we lose prioritisation on restart.
- Note the removal due to block/conflict is only done when `removeForBlock` is called, i.e. when the block is received. If you load a mempool.dat containing `mapDeltas` with transactions that were mined already (e.g. the file was saved prior to the last few blocks), you don't delete them.
- Related: #4818 and #6464.
- There is no way to query the node for not-in-mempool `mapDeltas`. If you add a priority and forget what the value was, the only way to get that information is to inspect mempool.dat.
- Calling `prioritisetransaction` with an inverse value does not remove it from `mapDeltas`, it just sets the value to 0. It disappears on a restart (`LoadMempool` checks if delta is 0), but that might not happen for a while.
Added together, if a user calls `prioritisetransaction` very regularly and not all those transactions get mined/conflicted, `mapDeltas` might keep lots of entries of delta=0 around. A user should clean up the not-in-mempool prioritisations, but that's currently difficult without keeping track of what those txids/amounts are.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 67b7fecacd
theStack:
Code-review ACK 67b7fecacd
instagibbs:
code review ACK 67b7fecacd
ajtowns:
ACK 67b7fecacd code review only, some nits
Tree-SHA512: 9df48b622ef27f33db1a2748f682bb3f16abe8172fcb7ac3c1a3e1654121ffb9b31aeaad5570c4162261f7e2ff5b5912ddc61a1b8beac0e9f346a86f5952260a
65e3abcbf2 doc: document json rpc endpoints (willcl-ark)
Pull request description:
fixes#20246
This documents the two JSON-RPC endpoints available, details when they are active, specifies when they can or must be used, and outlines some known behaviour quirks.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 65e3abcbf2 - Seems fine. Can be improved if need be.
Tree-SHA512: d557c2caf000a1bdd7b46c9da38afe63dc28446ba4a961526f1af3cec81d994a9da663e02c81ebdc4f609b794585349cfca77a582dc1e788c120de1d3b4c7db6
2cd28e9fef rpc: Add check for unintended option/parameter name clashes (Ryan Ofsky)
95d7de0964 test: Update python tests to use named parameters instead of options objects (Ryan Ofsky)
96233146dd RPC: Allow RPC methods accepting options to take named parameters (Ryan Ofsky)
702b56d2a8 RPC: Add add OBJ_NAMED_PARAMS type (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
Allow RPC methods which take an `options` parameter (`importmulti`, `listunspent`, `fundrawtransaction`, `bumpfee`, `send`, `sendall`, `walletcreatefundedpsbt`, `simulaterawtransaction`), to accept the options as named parameters, without the need for nested JSON objects.
This makes it possible to make calls like:
```sh
src/bitcoin-cli -named bumpfee txid fee_rate=10
```
instead of
```sh
src/bitcoin-cli -named bumpfee txid options='{"fee_rate": 10}'
```
RPC help is also updated to show options as top level named arguments instead of as nested objects.
<details><summary>diff</summary>
<p>
```diff
@@ -15,16 +15,17 @@
Arguments:
1. txid (string, required) The txid to be bumped
-2. options (json object, optional)
+2. options (json object, optional) Options object that can be used to pass named arguments, listed below.
+
+Named Arguments:
- {
- "conf_target": n, (numeric, optional, default=wallet -txconfirmtarget) Confirmation target in blocks
+conf_target (numeric, optional, default=wallet -txconfirmtarget) Confirmation target in blocks
- "fee_rate": amount, (numeric or string, optional, default=not set, fall back to wallet fee estimation)
+fee_rate (numeric or string, optional, default=not set, fall back to wallet fee estimation)
Specify a fee rate in sat/vB instead of relying on the built-in fee estimator.
Must be at least 1.000 sat/vB higher than the current transaction fee rate.
WARNING: before version 0.21, fee_rate was in BTC/kvB. As of 0.21, fee_rate is in sat/vB.
- "replaceable": bool, (boolean, optional, default=true) Whether the new transaction should still be
+replaceable (boolean, optional, default=true) Whether the new transaction should still be
marked bip-125 replaceable. If true, the sequence numbers in the transaction will
be left unchanged from the original. If false, any input sequence numbers in the
original transaction that were less than 0xfffffffe will be increased to 0xfffffffe
@@ -32,11 +33,10 @@
still be replaceable in practice, for example if it has unconfirmed ancestors which
are replaceable).
- "estimate_mode": "str", (string, optional, default="unset") The fee estimate mode, must be one of (case insensitive):
+estimate_mode (string, optional, default="unset") The fee estimate mode, must be one of (case insensitive):
"unset"
"economical"
"conservative"
- }
Result:
{ (json object)
```
</p>
</details>
**Review suggestion:** To understand this PR, it is probably easiest to review the commits in reverse order because the last commit shows the external API changes, the middle commit shows the internal API changes, and the first commit contains the low-level implementation.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 2cd28e9fef
Tree-SHA512: 50f6e78fa622826dab3f810400d8c1a03a98a090b1f2fea79729c58ad8cff955554bd44c2a5975f62a526b900dda68981862fd7d7d05c17f94f5b5d847317436
6fce5ddc17 doc: update getnodeaddresses for CJDNS, I2P and Tor and rm link (Marnix)
Pull request description:
- remove broken link about how to properly configure tor
- generalize getnodeaddresses RPC in doc
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 6fce5ddc17
Tree-SHA512: 3a077a0724c57a5c6182d40fbf34a84d2515bf1bf06ea0ce717174d0a27f5b19b9521c1ed1995adfdf4d43c2ce978a81e2ec9e3c8faf83f5188571fa75ea5314
eefe56967b bugfix: Fix incorrect debug.log config file path (Ryan Ofsky)
3746f00be1 init: Error if ignored bitcoin.conf file is found (Ryan Ofsky)
398c3719b0 lint: Fix lint-format-strings false positives when format specifiers have argument positions (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
Show an error on startup if a bitcoin datadir that is being used contains a `bitcoin.conf` file that is ignored. There are two cases where this could happen:
- One case reported in [#27246 (comment)](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27246#issuecomment-1470006043) happens when a `bitcoin.conf` file in the default datadir (e.g. `$HOME/.bitcoin/bitcoin.conf`) has a `datadir=/path` line that sets different datadir containing a second `bitcoin.conf` file. Currently the second `bitcoin.conf` file is ignored with no warning.
- Another way this could happen is if a `-conf=` command line argument points to a configuration file with a `datadir=/path` line and that path contains a `bitcoin.conf` file, which is currently ignored.
This change only adds an error message and doesn't change anything about way settings are applied. It also doesn't trigger errors if there are redundant `-datadir` or `-conf` settings pointing at the same configuration file, only if they are pointing at different files and one file is being ignored.
ACKs for top commit:
pinheadmz:
re-ACK eefe56967b
willcl-ark:
re-ACK eefe56967b
TheCharlatan:
ACK eefe56967b
Tree-SHA512: 939a98a4b271b5263d64a2df3054c56fcde94784edf6f010d78693a371c38aa03138ae9cebb026b6164bbd898d8fd0845a61a454fd996e328fd7bcf51c580c2b
This requires a linux kernel of 3.17.0+, which seems entirely
reasonable. 3.17 went EOL in 2015, and the last supported 3.x kernel
(3.16) went EOL > 4 years ago, in 2020. For reference, the current
oldest maintained kernel is 4.14 (released 2017, EOL Jan 2024).
Support for `getrandom()` (and `getentropy()`) was added to
glibc 2.25, https://sourceware.org/legacy-ml/libc-alpha/2017-02/msg00079.html,
and we already require 2.27+.
All that being said, I don't think you would encounter a current day
system, running with kernel headers older than 3.17 (released 2014) but
also having a glibc of 2.27+ (released 2018).
4bfcbbfd4a doc: remove Security section from build-unix.md (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Our compile documentation isn't the right place for generic binary hardening notes, which are neither particularly Bitcoin-Core specific, or as relevant as they might have once been, i.e non-executable stacks are now just the norm.
Just remove the notes for now, if someone has something more interesting/Bitcoin Core specific, it could be added in separate documentation in the future (maybe into the devwiki or similar).
Split from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27685#discussion_r1196517868.
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
ACK 4bfcbbfd4a
Tree-SHA512: 01b523ba40353d6cafb5dbd6540b514d83a2dc4e462a068fb390ca7de45b78e4a329367f70527f1824006ebe43f8caeea4ad05ec60556d5a5bd0143e27bf6581
fa953f15bf build: Bump minimum supported GCC to g++-9 (MarcoFalke)
fa69955e74 ci: Bump centos:stream8 to centos:stream9 (MarcoFalke)
fa6a755d9f ci: Document the false positive error for g++-9 (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
It is a bit frustrating to write valid C++ code only to realize that g++-8 fails to parse it later on.
The only non-EOL operating system still shipping with g++-8 is CentOS Stream 8. I think it is reasonable for users of affected Linux distributions to:
* Upgrade their operating system, or compiler to a supported version.
* Alternatively, stay with a previous release of Bitcoin Core as long as it is supported.
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27537
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK fa953f15bf
fanquake:
ACK fa953f15bf
Tree-SHA512: b9cf7e763d3071e1e008c5010de19601d4773afe46d58cf869d3f59285c53240c739a1cd7235a5525ede1bbdf6b6cb6fb091c8fc314864a28d5b27a400bb7632
Our compile documentation isn't the right place for genric binary
hardening notes, which are neither particularly Bitcoin-Core specific,
or as relevant as they might have once been, i.e non-executable stacks
are now just the norm.
Just remove the notes for now, if someone has
something more interesting/Bitcoin Core specific, it could be added in
separate documentation in the future (maybe into the devwiki or
similar).
Split from
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27685#discussion_r1196517868.
fa29651c3f doc: Rework build-unix.md (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The doc has many issues:
* The fist section contains outdated non-existing and confusing configure flags like `--enable-cxx` and `--disable-shared`, as well as edge-case expert options such as `BDB_PREFIX`. Fix that by removing the section and adding notes elsewhere, if applicable.
* There are links to the depends system before instructions on how to simply build from system packages. Fix that by moving that later.
* Also, remove sections that are duplicate with other depends READMEs.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fa29651c3f
TheCharlatan:
ACK fa29651c3f
Tree-SHA512: 5348ddf3fa094c630d80b63033ca7b40ec0356427856f9a1075b31244f6bf8ec65cb2a738366e1174ef2fe7e0bf5cc249a62c58f458bbaf50668aceeac954820
7014e08015 doc: remove mention of glibc 2.10+ (fanquake)
Pull request description:
We already require glibc 2.27+, so mentioning a much older version here is redundant.
ACKs for top commit:
TheCharlatan:
ACK 7014e08015
Tree-SHA512: 883a566a80cabe34bfb5d902990f3eca08d0e11438e6c128d311e558f373ec232b0934deb85d12d796baacfeae590af8c73aa1b2faef07f27ffa9011270ffd96
fe49f06c0e doc: clarify PR 26076 release note (Sjors Provoost)
bd13dc2f46 Switch hardened derivation marker to h in descriptors (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
This makes it easier to handle descriptor strings manually, especially when importing from another Bitcoin Core wallet.
For example the `importdescriptors` RPC call is easiest to use `h` as the marker: `'["desc": ".../0h/..."]'`, avoiding the need for escape characters. With this change `listdescriptors` will use `h`, so you can copy-paste the result, without having to add escape characters or switch `'` to 'h' manually.
Both markers can still be parsed.
The `hdkeypath` field in `getaddressinfo` is also impacted by this change, except for legacy wallets. The latter is to prevent accidentally breaking ancient software that uses our legacy wallet.
See discussion in #15740
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fe49f06c0e
darosior:
re-ACK fe49f06c0e
Tree-SHA512: f78bc873b24a6f7a2bf38f5dd58f2b723e35e6b10e4d65c36ec300e2d362d475eeca6e5afa04b3037ab4bee0bf8ebc93ea5fc18102a2111d3d88fc873c08dc89
9143b6988b [doc] Add post branch-off note about fuzz input pruning (dergoegge)
Pull request description:
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 82658faaa31668591853703604edb45ce24ee703b8f4077ab690865f3674e154f76c55c3b523f543a862aab9707d70a46c8bf4d41b51d0002635806413921017
710b83938a rpc: return block hash & height in getbalances, gettransaction & getwalletinfo JSONs (Harris)
Pull request description:
Reopens#18570 and closes#18567.
I have rebased the original PR.
Not sure why the original got closed as it was about to get merged.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 710b83938a
Tree-SHA512: d4478d990be98b1642e9ffb2930987f4a224e8bd64e2e35a5dda927a54c509ec9d712cd0eac35dc2bb89f00a1678e530ce14d7445f1dd93aa3a4cce2bc9b130d
fac395e5eb ci: Bump ci/lint/Dockerfile (MarcoFalke)
fa6eb65167 test: Use python3.8 pow() (MarcoFalke)
88881cf7ac Bump python minimum version to 3.8 (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
There is no pressing reason to drop support for 3.7, however there are several maintenance issues:
* There is no supported operating system that ships 3.7 by default. (debian:buster is EOL and unmaintained to the extent that it doesn't run in the CI environment. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27340#issuecomment-1484988445)
* Compiling python 3.7 from source is also unsupported on at least macos, according to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24017#issuecomment-1107820790
* Recent versions of lief require 3.8, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27507#issuecomment-1517561645
Fix all maintenance issues by bumping the minimum.
ACKs for top commit:
RandyMcMillan:
ACK fac395e
fjahr:
ACK fac395e5eb
fanquake:
ACK fac395e5eb
Tree-SHA512: c198decdbbe29d186d73ea3f6549d8a38479383495d14a965a2f9211ce39637b43f13a4c2a5d3bf56e2d468be4bbe49b4ee8e8e19ec69936ff43ddf2b714c712
0c520679ab doc: add release notes for `abandoned` field in `gettransaction` and `listtransactions` (brunoerg)
a1aaa7f51f rpc, wallet: add `abandoned` field for all categories of transactions in ListTransactions (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
Fixes#25130
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 0c520679ab
Tree-SHA512: 1864460d76decab7898737c96517d722055eb8f81ca52248fe1035723258c6cd4a93251e06a86ecbbb0b0a80af1466b2c86fb142ace4ccb74cc40d5dc3967d7f
bf77fc9cb4 [test] mempool full in package accept (glozow)
b51ebccc28 [validation] set PackageValidationState when mempool full (glozow)
563a2ee4f5 [policy] disallow transactions under min relay fee, even in packages (glozow)
c4554fe894 [test] package cpfp bumps parents <mempoolminfee but >=minrelaytxfee (glozow)
ac463e87df [test util] mock mempool minimum feerate (glozow)
Pull request description:
Part of package relay, see #27463.
Note that this still allows packages to bump transactions that are below the dynamic mempool minimum feerate, which means this still solves the "mempool is congested and my presigned 1sat/vB tx is screwed" problem for all transactions.
On master, the package policy (only accessible through regtest-only RPC submitpackage) allows 0-fee (or otherwise below min relay feerate) transactions if they are bumped by a child. However, with default package limits, we don't yet have a DoS-resistant way of ensuring these transactions remain bumped throughout their time in the mempool. Primarily, the fee-bumping child may later be replaced by another transaction that doesn't bump the parent(s). The parent(s) could potentially stay bumped by other transactions, but not enough to ever be selected by the `BlockAssembler` (due to `blockmintxfee`).
For example, (tested [here](https://github.com/glozow/bitcoin/commits/26933-motivation)):
- The mempool accepts 24 below-minrelayfeerate transactions ("0-fee parents"), all bumped by a single high-fee transaction ("the fee-bumping child"). The fee-bumping child also spends a confirmed UTXO.
- Two additional children are added to each 0-fee parent. These children each pay a feerate slightly above the minimum relay feerate (e.g. 1.9sat/vB) such that, for each 0-fee parent, the total fees of its two children divided by the total size of the children and parent is above the minimum relay feerate.
- If a block template is built now, all transactions would be selected.
- A transaction replaces the the fee-bumping child, spending only the confirmed UTXO and not any of the outputs from the 0-fee parents.
- The 0-fee parents now each have 2 children. Their descendant feerates are above minrelayfeerate, which means that they remain in the mempool, even if the mempool evicts all below-minrelayfeerate packages.
- If a block template is built now, none of the 0-fee parents or their children would be selected.
- Even more low-feerate descendants can be added to these below-minrelayfeerate packages and they will not be evicted until they expire or the mempool reaches capacity.
Unless we have a DoS-resistant way of ensuring package CPFP-bumped transactions are always bumped, allowing package CPFP to bump below-minrelayfeerate transactions can result in these problematic situations. See #27018 which proposes a partial solution with some limitations, and contains discussion about potential improvements to eviction strategy. While no adequate solution exists, for now, avoid these situations by requiring all transactions to meet min relay feerate.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
reACK bf77fc9cb4
instagibbs:
re-ACK bf77fc9cb4
Tree-SHA512: 28940f41493a9e280b010284316fb8caf1ed7b2090ba9a4ef8a3b2eafc5933601074b142f4f7d4e3c6c4cce99d3146f5c8e1393d9406c6f2070dd41c817985c9
Show an error on startup if a bitcoin datadir that is being used contains a
`bitcoin.conf` file that is ignored. There are two cases where this could
happen:
- One case reported in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27246#issuecomment-1470006043
happens when a bitcoin.conf file in the default datadir (e.g.
$HOME/.bitcoin/bitcoin.conf) has a "datadir=/path" line that sets different
datadir containing a second bitcoin.conf file. Currently the second
bitcoin.conf file is ignored with no warning.
- Another way this could happen is if a -conf= command line argument points
to a configuration file with a "datadir=/path" line and that specified path
contains a bitcoin.conf file, which is currently ignored.
This change only adds an error message and doesn't change anything about way
settings are applied. It also doesn't trigger errors if there are redundant
-datadir or -conf settings pointing at the same configuration file, only if
they are pointing at different files and one file is being ignored.
a2bef805c1 kernel: update m_assumed_* chain params for 25.x (fanquake)
4128e01dba kernel: update chainTxData for 25.x (fanquake)
00b2b114b4 kernel: update nMinimumChainWork & defaultAssumeValid for 25.x (fanquake)
07fcc0a82c doc: update references to kernel/chainparams.cpp (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Update chainparams pre `25.x` branch off.
Co-Author in the commits as a PR (#27223) had previously been opened too-early to do the same.
Note: Remember that some variance is expected in the `m_assumed_*` sizes.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK a2bef805c1
josibake:
ACK a2bef805c1
gruve-p:
ACK a2bef805c1
dergoegge:
ACK a2bef805c1 on the new mainnet params
Tree-SHA512: 0b19c2ef15c6b15863d6a560a1053ee223057c7bfb617ffd3400b1734cee8f75bc6fd7f04d8f8e3f5af6220659a1987951a1b36945d6fe17d06972004fd62610
Avoid adding transactions below min relay feerate because, even if they
were bumped through CPFP when entering the mempool, we do not have a
DoS-resistant way of ensuring they always remain bumped. In the future,
this rule can be relaxed (e.g. to allow packages to bump 0-fee
transactions) if we find a way to do so.
7ccdd741fe test: fix importmulti/importdescriptors assertion (Jon Atack)
19d888ce40 rpc: move WALLET_FLAG_CAVEATS to the compilation unit of its caller (Jon Atack)
01df011ca2 doc: release note for wallet RPCs "warning" field deprecation (Jon Atack)
9ea8b3739a test: createwallet "warning" field deprecation test (Jon Atack)
645d7f75ac rpc: deprecate "warning" field in {create,load,unload,restore}wallet (Jon Atack)
2f4a926e95 test: add test coverage for "warnings" field in createwallet (Jon Atack)
4a1e479ca6 rpc: add "warnings" field to RPCs {create,load,unload,restore}wallet (Jon Atack)
079d8cdda8 rpc: extract wallet "warnings" fields to a util helper (Jon Atack)
f73782a903 doc: fix/improve warning helps in {create,load,unload,restore}wallet (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Based on discussion and concept ACKed in #27138, add a `warnings` field to RPCs createwallet, loadwallet, unloadwallet, and restorewallet as a JSON array of strings to replace the `warning` string field in these 4 RPCs. The idea is to more gracefully handle multiple warning messages and for consistency with other wallet RPCs. Then, deprecate the latter fields, which represent all the remaining RPC `warning` fields.
The first commit f73782a903 implements https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27138#issuecomment-1474789198 as an alternative to #27138. One of those two could potentially be backported to our currently supported releases.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 7ccdd741fe
1440000bytes:
utACK 7ccdd741fe
vasild:
ACK 7ccdd741fe
pinheadmz:
re-ACK 7ccdd741fe
Tree-SHA512: 314e0a4c41fa383d95e2817bfacf359d449e460529d235c3eb902851e2f4eacbabe646d9a5a4beabc4964cdfabf6397ed8301366a58d344a2f787f83b75e9d64
6b17994ede doc: update OpenBSD build docs for 7.3 (external signer support available) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
With OpenBSD 7.3, the waitid(2) system call is implemented (see 8112871f19, first mentioned kernel improvement at https://www.openbsd.org/73.html).
This means Boost.Process finally doesn't fail to compile anymore and we can remove the build hint about missing external signer support. Tested on my amd64 machine by reconfiguring / rebuilding master branch and successfully running the functional test wallet_signer.py. ✔️
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 6b17994ede - haven't tested, but looks good to me.
Tree-SHA512: 5bbcecce4ced38d8221f2c906a54667e50317e9ded182554cf73bb7f2fce55a38e53730eca25f813cff1d2d65c94141eb158d40f83228d12dcf859c16a1798b9
