Since knowledge of CAddrInfo is limited to callsites that import
addrman_impl.h, only objects in addrman.cpp or the tests have access. Thus we
can remove calling them friends and make the members public.
Now that no bitcoind callers require knowledge of the CAddrInfo object, it can
be moved into the test-only header file.
Review hint: use git diff --color-moved=dimmed-zebra
--color-moved-ws=ignore-all-space
CAddrInfo objects are an implementation detail of how AddrMan manages and adds
metadata to different records. Encapsulate this logic by updating Select &
SelectTriedCollision to return the additional info that the callers need.
Introduce the pimpl pattern for CAddrMan to separate the implementation details
from the externally used object representation. This reduces compile-time
dependencies and conceptually clarifies AddrMan's interface from the
implementation specifics.
Since the unit & fuzz tests currently rely on accessing CAddrMan internals, this
commit introduces addrman_impl.h, which is exclusively imported by addrman.cpp
and test files.
Review hint: git diff --color-moved=dimmed-zebra
--color-moved-ws=ignore-all-space
Also move `Check` and `ForceCheckAddrman` to be after the `FunctionName_` functions.
Review hint: use git diff --color-moved=dimmed-zebra
--color-moved-ws=ignore-all-space
240ea294d5 doc: update doxygen documention of ComputeTimeSmart() and AddToWalletIfInvolvingMe() regarding rescanning_old_block parameter (BitcoinTsunami)
d6eb39af21 test: add functional test to check transaction time determination during block rescanning (BitcoinTsunami)
07b44f16e7 wallet: fix ComputeTimeSmart algorithm to use blocktime during old block rescanning (BitcoinTsunami)
Pull request description:
The function ComputeTimeSmart in wallet.cpp assume that transaction are discovered in the right order.
Moreover the 'smarttime' determination algorithm is coded with realtime scenario in mind and not rescanning of old block.
The functional test demonstrate that if the user import a wallet, then rescan only recent history, and then rescan the entire history, the older transaction discovered would have an incorrect time determination.
In the context of rescanning old block, the only time value that as a meaning is the blocktime.
That's why I've fixed the problem with a simple separation between rescanning of old block and realtime time determination. The fix is written to have no impact on every realtime scenario and only impact the behaviour during a rescanning process.
This PR Fixes#20181.
To be fair, I don't think that this bug could be triggered with the wallet GUI, because it always proceed with a proper rescan.
But RPC API provide the possibility to trigger it. I've discovered it, because Specter desktop v0.10.0 was impacted. (https://github.com/cryptoadvance/specter-desktop/issues/680).
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 240ea294d5 per `git diff b92d552 240ea29`, re-verified rebase to latest master + debug build clean + new test passes on the branch and fails on master, only change since my review a few hours ago is incorporation of latest review suggestions
meshcollider:
re-utACK 240ea294d5
Tree-SHA512: 514b02e41d011ddfa325f5e8080b93800e1ea4ed5853fa420670a6ac700e8b463000dbea65f8ced8565cfb950c7f51b69154034dcb111e67aca3b964a0061494
ea31caf6b4 update estimatesmartfee rpc to return max of estimateSmartFee, mempoolMinFee and minRelayTxFee. (pranabp-bit)
Pull request description:
This PR is in response to the issue [#19699](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/19699).
Based on the discussion in the comments of PR [#22673](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22673) changes have been made in the `estimatesmartfee` itself such that it takes into account `mempoolMinFee` and `relayMinFee` . Hence it provides a fee estimate that is most likely to be paid by the user in an actual transaction, preventing issues such as [#16072](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16072).
The test file test/functional/feature_fee_estimation.py has also been updated to check this functionality.
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
re-utACK ea31caf6b4
Tree-SHA512: 8f36153a07cbd552c5c13d11d9c6e987a7a555ea4cc83f2573c0c92dd97c706d90c30a7248671437c2f3a836d3272f8fad53d15a5fa6efaa0409ae8009b0a18d
43cd6b8af9 doc: add release notes for removal of the -deprecatedrpc=addresses flag (Michael Dietz)
2b1fdc2c6c refactor: minor styling, prefer snake case and same line if (Michael Dietz)
d64deac7b8 refactor: share logic between ScriptPubKeyToUniv and ScriptToUniv (Michael Dietz)
8721638daa rpc: remove deprecated addresses and reqSigs from rpc outputs (Michael Dietz)
Pull request description:
Resolves#21797 now that we've branched-off to v23 ("addresses" and "reqSigs" deprecated) "ExtractDestinations" should be removed.
`-deprecatedrpc=addresses` was initially added in this PR #20286 (which resolved the original issue #20102).
Some chunks of code and logic are no longer used/necessary with the removal of this, and therefore some minor refactoring is done in this PR as well (separated commits)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 43cd6b8af9🐉
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 43cd6b8af9
jonatack:
ACK 43cd6b8af9 per `git range-diff a9d0cec 92dc5e9 43cd6b8`, also rebased to latest master, debug built + quick re-review of each commit to bring back context, and ran tests locally at the final commit
Tree-SHA512: fba83495e396d3c06f0dcf49292f14f4aa6b68fa758f0503941fade1a6e7271cda8378e2734af1faea550d1b43c85a36c52ebcc9dec0732936f9233b4b97901c
03a5fe06bd qt: Keep InitExecutor in main gui thread (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
The `InitExecutor` constructor moves the instance to a dedicated thread. This PR changes that by using `GUIUtil::ObjectInvoke` to run the relevant code in that thread.
A possible follow-up is to ditch the dedicated thread and use `QThreadPool` or even `QtConcurrent::run` (if we want to enable that).
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 03a5fe06bd, tested on Linux Mint 20.2 (Qt 5.12.8).
jarolrod:
ACK 03a5fe06bd
Tree-SHA512: 8b40300371d4c04efb9913600a06ba4899af0b5f50fdb26ea23ec751df6d3bd52f8bd693a5e8f6a94ebf3790583dc96c6070e6878d247dece62347aa9bd99031
In preparation for introducing the pimpl pattern to addrman, move all function
bodies out of the header file.
Review hint: use git diff --color-moved=dimmed-zebra
--color-moved-ws=ignore-all-space
This will provide better estimates which would be closer to fee paid in actual
transactions.
The test has also been changed such that when the node is restarted with a
high mempoolMinFee, the estimatesmartfee still returns a feeRate greater
than or equal to the mempoolMinFee, minRelayTxFee.(just like the feeRate of actual transactions)
7e3ee4cdd0 GUI: Ask user to unlock wallet before signing psbt (Samuel Dobson)
0f3acecf33 Add test that walletprocesspsbt requires unlocked wallet when signing (Samuel Dobson)
0e895212bb Ensure wallet is unlocked before signing in walletprocesspsbt (Samuel Dobson)
Pull request description:
If signing a PSBT, we need to ensure the wallet is unlocked.
Fixes#22874, fixesbitcoin-core/gui#312
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 7e3ee4cdd0
lsilva01:
Code Review ACK 7e3ee4cdd0
benthecarman:
ACK 7e3ee4cdd0
Tree-SHA512: 6726a873582747900ab454ea21153a92be86808a4c1517dc2856b389876a2da9e8df1ffa9b567b6bd017038342c3544ecf5ca3c97744e7debe0a5ee65563687d
efcaefc7b5 test: Add remaining scenarios of 0 waste (rajarshimaitra)
Pull request description:
As per the [review club](https://bitcoincore.reviews/22009) discussion on #22009 , it was observed that there were other two fee scenarios in which selection waste could be zero.
These are:
- (LTF - Fee) == Change Cost
- (LTF - Fee) == Excess
Even though these are obvious by the definition of waste metric, adding tests for them can be helpful in explaining its behavior
to new readers of the code base, along with pinning the behavior for future.
This PR adds those two cases to waste calculation unit test.
Also let me know if I am missing more scenarios.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Tested re-ACK efcaefc7b5
achow101:
ACK efcaefc7b5
meshcollider:
ACK efcaefc7b5
Tree-SHA512: 13fe3e2c0ea7bb58d34e16c32908b84705130dec16382ff941e5e60ca5b379f9c5811b33f36c4c72d7a98cfbb6af2f196d0a69e96989afa4b9e49893eaadd7cb
With this change, we get more fine-grained error messages if something
goes wrong in the course of communicating with the SQLite database. To
pick some random examples, the error codes SQLITE_IOERR_NOMEM,
SQLITE_IOERR_CORRUPTFS or SQLITE_IOERR_FSYNC are way more specific than just a
plain SQLITE_IOERR, and the corresponding error messages generated by
sqlite3_errstr() will hence give a better hint to the user (or also to the
developers, if an error report is sent) what the cause for a failure is.
93b9800fec scripted-diff: Rename overloaded int GetArg to GetIntArg (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This is meant to improve readability of code and remove guesswork needed to determine argument types and migrate to [typed arguments (#22978)](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22978) by having distinctly named `GetArg` `GetArgs` `GetBoolArg` and `GetIntArg` methods.
---
This commit was originally part of #22766 and had some review discussion there. But it was [wisely suggested](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22766#issuecomment-910001542) to be split off to make that PR smaller.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 93b9800fec.
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 93b9800fec📨
Tree-SHA512: e034bd938b2c8fbadd90bcd52213a61161965dfddf18c2cb0d68816ecf2438cde8afee6fb7e3418f5c6b35c208338da9deb99e4e418dbf68ca34552e0916a625
dc10ca346b net: switch to signet DNS seed (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
I spun up a DNS seed for Signet, source: https://github.com/sipa/bitcoin-seeder/pull/94
If anyone else spins up a DNS seed, let me know in the comment and I'll add it.
Because one DNS seed is not very diverse, this PR leaves two hardcoded nodes just in case (). The one dropped node no longer exists.
Replaces #23000.
ACKs for top commit:
kallewoof:
utACK dc10ca346b
laanwj:
Concept and code review ACK dc10ca346b
jarolrod:
ACK dc10ca346b
shaavan:
ACK dc10ca346b
Tree-SHA512: 534d189becd51974042fddc3efe3df230484f05cd945e756eaf6a4a8a580e2161b3a959eb3d44dea526269eea6f87a033f7cbfe86586782c6ca4ee7c7c4097a9
b8cd2a4292 Add references for the generator/constant used in Bech32(m) (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
I often find myself recreating this, or looking up references for this construction. So instead, this seems like as good a place as any to place a summary.
ACKs for top commit:
Zero-1729:
crACK b8cd2a4292
Tree-SHA512: 9d2001c5016485cea441c28fda093d67a7d4274e4c1e4dd3d357353ce6a52987e38d684d8462bad2d72ba0b6b1db2f809948e228fb02371e64b12146aace89bd
d2eccacd18 doc: Clarify that change_cost cannot be negative in GetSelectionWaste (benthecarman)
Pull request description:
We assert that the `change_cost` must be positive so we should document it in the function's docs
4f5ad43b1e/src/wallet/coinselection.cpp (L361)
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK d2eccacd18
jarolrod:
ACK d2eccacd18
shaavan:
ACK d2eccacd18
Tree-SHA512: 089bc41d7e212b811455527ce2ac83301eae0edc03933dcbd5229b22078827395c8e3bcfda0ba029b7c60705db3119b4f80e372842a6bd8dae195dbaa0b52833
Before this patch, the log might be corrupted by other threads logging
at the same time. For example, another RPC thread:
[httpworker.1] [default wallet] keypool reserve 1296
[httpworker.1] SelectCoins() best subset: Received a POST request for / from 127.0.0.1:53732
[httpworker.3] ThreadRPCServer method=getnetworkinfo user=__cookie__
[httpworker.1] 0.78125 0.1953125 0.02441406 0.00610351 0.00305175 0.00152587 total 1.01025417
Improve readability of code, simplify future scripted diff cleanup PRs, and be
more consistent with naming for GetBoolArg.
This will also be useful for replacing runtime settings type checking
with compile time checking.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
git grep -l GetArg | xargs sed -i 's/GetArg(\([^)]*\( [0-9]\+\|-1\|port\|BaseParams().RPCPort()\|Params().GetDefaultPort()\|_TIMEOUT\|Height\|_WORKQUEUE\|_THREADS\|_CONNECTIONS\|LIMIT\|SigOp\|Bytes\|_VERSION\|_AGE\|_CHECKS\|Checks() ? 1 : 0\|_BANTIME\|Cache\|BLOCKS\|LEVEL\|Weight\|Version\|BUFFER\|TARGET\|WEIGHT\|TXN\|TRANSACTIONS\|ADJUSTMENT\|i64\|Size\|nDefault\|_EXPIRY\|HEIGHT\|SIZE\|SNDHWM\|_TIME_MS\)\))/GetIntArg(\1)/g'
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
Co-authored-by: Hennadii Stepanov <32963518+hebasto@users.noreply.github.com>
ee7891a0c4 doc: Remove outdated comments (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
The first removed comment was introduced in #5288, the second one in #13503.
Both are outdated since #14336.
ACKs for top commit:
duncandean:
crACK ee7891a0
Tree-SHA512: a2d6071919e81c916bfc2178109bbc464417321bcc567ed0644448c5faea8e58cb08a7657afa1b6ffe1fb63e114a2a47b31c893e471839ba9d49a3986e68b2a7
faa9c19a4b doc: Add 23061 release notes (MarcoFalke)
faff17bbde Fix (inverse) meaning of -persistmempool (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Passing `-persistmempool` is currently treated as `-nopersistmempool`
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
reACK faa9c19a4b
hebasto:
ACK faa9c19a4b, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: f34a89a07745dabe340eb845b2a348b79c093e9056f7a21c17e1ba2e278177c9b4cf30e8095791fd645a7f90eb34850b2eee0c869b4f6ec02bf749c73b0e52ee
d96b000e94 Make GUI UTXO lock/unlock persistent (Samuel Dobson)
077154fe69 Add release note for lockunspent change (Samuel Dobson)
719ae927dc Update lockunspent tests for lock persistence (Samuel Dobson)
f13fc16295 Allow lockunspent to store the lock in the wallet DB (Samuel Dobson)
c52789365e Allow locked UTXOs to be store in the wallet database (Samuel Dobson)
Pull request description:
Addresses and closes#22368
As per that issue (and its predecessor #14907), there seems to be some interest in allowing unspent outputs to be locked persistently. This PR does so by adding a flag to lockunspent to store the change in the wallet database. Defaults to false, so there is no change in default behaviour.
Edit: GUI commit changes default behaviour. UTXOs locked/unlocked via the GUI are now persistent.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK d96b000e94
kristapsk:
ACK d96b000e94
lsilva01:
Tested ACK d96b000e94 on Ubuntu 20.04
prayank23:
ACK d96b000e94
Tree-SHA512: 957a5bbfe7f763036796906ccb1598feb6c14c5975838be1ba24a198840bf59e83233165cb112cebae909b6b25bf27275a4d7fa425923ef6c788ff671d7a89a8
e148a52332 bench: fixed ubsan implicit conversion (Martin Ankerl)
da4e2f1da0 bench: various args improvements (Jon Atack)
d312fd94a1 bench: clean up includes (Jon Atack)
1f10f1663e bench: add usage description and documentation (Martin Ankerl)
d3c6f8bfa1 bench: introduce -min_time argument (Martin Ankerl)
9fef832932 bench: make EvictionProtection.* work with any number of iterations (Martin Ankerl)
153e6860e8 bench: change AddrManGood to AddrManAddThenGood (Martin Ankerl)
468b232f71 bench: remove unnecessary & incorrect multiplication in MuHashDiv (Martin Ankerl)
eed99cf272 bench: update nanobench from 4.3.4 to 4.3.6 (Martin Ankerl)
Pull request description:
This PR updates the nanobench with the latest release from upstream, v4.3.6. It fixes the missing performance counters.
Due to discussions on #22999 I have done some work that should make the benchmark results more reliable. It introduces a new flag `-min_time` that allows to run a benchmark for much longer then the default. When results are unreliable, choosing a large timeframe here should usually get repeatable results even when frequency scaling cannot be disabled. The default is now 10ms. For this to work I have changed the `AddrManGood` and `EvictionProtection` benchmarks so they work with any number of iterations.
Also, this adds more usage documentation to `bench_bitcoin -h` and I've cherry-picked two changes from #22999 authored by Jon Atack
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
re-ACK e148a52332
laanwj:
Code review ACK e148a52332
Tree-SHA512: 2da6de19a5c85ac234b190025e195c727546166dbb75e3f9267e667a73677ba1e29b7765877418a42b1407b65df901e0130763936525e6f1450f18f08837c40c
fa4db8671b test: Activate all regtest softforks at height 1, unless overridden (MarcoFalke)
faad1e5ffd Introduce -testactivationheight=name@height setting (MarcoFalke)
fadb2ef2fa test: Add extra_args argument to TestChain100Setup constructor (MarcoFalke)
faa46986aa test: Remove version argument from build_next_block in p2p_segwit test (MarcoFalke)
fa086ef539 test: Remove unused ~TestChain100Setup (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
All softforks that are active at the tip of mainnet, should also be active from genesis in regtest. Otherwise their rules might not be enforced in user testing, thus making their testing less useful.
To still allow tests to check pre-softfork rules, a runtime argument can change the activation height.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fa4db8671b
theStack:
re-ACK fa4db8671b
Tree-SHA512: 6397d46ff56ebc48c007a4cda633904d6ac085bc76b4ecf83097c546c7eec93ac0c44b88083b2611b9091c8d1fb8ee1e314065de078ef15e922c015de7ade8bf
There are two more cases where waste can be 0, when:
- (Fee - LTF) == -Change Cost
- (Fee - LTF) == -Excess
Adding these two conditions explicitly in the unit test will help
pin the behavior, also demonstrate waste calculation scenarios to new
readers.
It was [pointed out in #23030](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23030#issuecomment-922893367) that we might be able to get rid of our weak linking of [`getauxval()`](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/getauxval.3.html) (`HAVE_WEAK_GETAUXVAL`) entirely, with only Android being a potential holdout:
> I wonder if it's time to get rid of HAVE_WEAK_GETAUXVAL. I think it's confusing. Either we build against a C library that has this functionality, or not. We don't do this weak linking thing for any other symbols and recently got rid of the other glibc backwards compatibility stuff.
> Unless there is still a current platform that really needs it (Android?), I'd prefer to remove it from the build system, it has caused enough issues.
After looking at Android further, it would seem that given we are moving to using `std::filesystem`, which [requires NDK version 22 and later](https://github.com/android/ndk/wiki/Changelog-r22), and `getauxval` has been available in the since [API version 18](https://developer.android.com/ndk/guides/cpu-features#features_using_libcs_getauxval3), that shouldn't really be an issue. Support for API levels < 19 will be dropped with the NDK 24 release, and according to [one website](https://apilevels.com/), supporting API level 18+ will cover ~99% of devices. Note that in the CI we currently build with NDK version 22 and API level 28.
The other change in this PR is removing the include of headers for ARM intrinsics, from the check for strong `getauxval()` support in configure, as they shouldn't be needed. Including these headers also meant that the check would basically only succeed when building for ARM. This would be an issue if we remove weak linking, as we wouldn't detect `getauxval()` as supported on other platforms. Note that we also use `getauxval()` in our RNG when it's available.
I've checked that with these changes we detect support for strong `getauxval()` on Alpine (muslibc). On Linux, previously we'd be detecting support for weak getauxval(), now we detect strong support. Note that we already require glibc 2.17, and `getauxval()` was introduced in `2.16`.
This is an alternative / supersedes #23030.
This ensures that if we're going to add an action to open up
a transaction in a third-party link (block explorer) that it
is seperated into it's own section.
The text for an open third-party tx URL action
is improved by appending the host name with "Show in".
This makes it self-explanatory what the action will do.
