17ae2601c7 build: remove build stubs for external leveldb (Cory Fields)
Pull request description:
Presumably these stubs indicate to packagers that external leveldb is meant to be supported in some way. It is not. Remove the stubs to avoid sending any mixed messages.
For context, this was reported on IRC:
> \<Talkless> bitcoind fails to start with undefined symbol: _ZTIN7leveldb6LoggerE in Debian Sid after leveldb upgraded from 1.22 to 1.23: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996486
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 17ae2601c7
hebasto:
ACK 17ae2601c7. I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: 2f1ac2cb30dac64791933a245a2b66ce237bde3955e6f4a6b7ec181248f77a9b1b10597d865d3e2c2b6def696af70de40e905ec274e4ae7cccd1daf461473957
b65a25a846 log: improve addrman logging (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
The addrman helper functions `GetNewBucket()` and `GetTriedBucket()`
1) log into the wrong category (`BCLog::NET` instead of `BCLog::ADDRMAN`)
2) log too unspecifically - especially `GetTriedBucket()` gets called from many different places (e.g. `Check_()`, `Serialize()`), it seems sufficient to me logging these when moving an address from new to tried. Running a node with `-checkaddrman=1`and net logging currently results in a lot of repetitive log entries.
This PR moves these log entries to `Add_()` and `Good_()` and also adds logging for `Select_()` (allowing statistics about New/Tried success probabilities), `GetAddr_()`, `ClearNew()` and `MakeTried()`.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK b65a25a846
vasild:
ACK b65a25a846
Tree-SHA512: 90ab0f64eb44b7388a198efccb613577b74989fea73194bda7de8bfbd50bdb19127cb12f5ec645c7859afdb89290614a79e255f3af0a63a58d4f21aa8fe7b696
instead of only for networks we have peer connections to.
Users reported the previous behavior caused confusion,
as no column was printed when a network was reachable
but no peers were connected. Users expected a column
to be printed with 0 peers. This commit aligns
behavior with that expectation.
ef72e9bd41 doc: nChainTx needs to become a 64-bit earlier due to SegWit (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
As of block 597,379 txcount is 460,596,047 (see `chainparams.cpp`), while `uint32` can handle up to 4,294,967,296.
Pre segwit the [minimum transaction size](https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Maximum_transaction_rate) was 166 bytes, so the worst case number of transactions per block was ~6000. As the original source comment for `unsigned int nChainTx` says, that should last until the year 2030.
With SegWit the smallest possible transaction is 60 bytes (potentially increased to 65 with a future soft fork, see #15482), without a witness:
```
4 bytes version
1 byte input count
36 bytes outpoint
1 byte scriptSigLen (0x00)
0 bytes scriptSig
4 bytes sequence
1 byte output count
8 bytes value
1 byte scriptPubKeyLen
1 byte scriptPubKey (OP_TRUE)
4 bytes locktime
```
That puts the maximum number of transactions per block at 16,666 so we might have to deal with this as early as a block 827,450 in early 2024.
Given that it's a memory-only thing and we want to allow users many years to upgrade, I would suggest fixing this in v0.20 and back-porting it.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
re-ACK ef72e9bd41
jarolrod:
ACK ef72e9bd41
theStack:
ACK ef72e9bd41
Tree-SHA512: d8509ba7641796cd82af156354ff3a12ff7ec0f7b11215edff6696e95f8ca0e3596f719f3492ac3acb4b0884ac4e5bddc76f107b656bc2ed95a8ef1b2b5d4f71
a0efe529e4 Fix outdated comments referring to ::ChainActive() (Samuel Dobson)
Pull request description:
After #21866 there are a few outdated comments referring to `::ChainActive()`, which should instead refer to `ChainstateManager::ActiveChain()`.
ACKs for top commit:
jamesob:
ACK a0efe529e4
Tree-SHA512: 80da19c105ed29ac247e6df4c8e916c3bf3f37230b63f07302114eef9c115add673e9649f0bbe237295be0c6da7b1030b5b93e14daf6768f17ce5de7cf2c9ff2
0f95247246 Integrate univalue into our buildsystem (Cory Fields)
9b49ed656f Squashed 'src/univalue/' changes from 98fadc0909..a44caf65fe (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This PR more tightly integrates building Univalue into our build system. This follows the same approach we use for [LevelDB](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/leveldb/), ([`Makefile.leveldb.include`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/Makefile.leveldb.include)), and [CRC32C](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/crc32c) ([`Makefile.crc32c.include`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/Makefile.crc32c.include)), and will be the same approach we use for [minisketch](https://github.com/sipa/minisketch); see #23114.
This approach yields a number of benefits, including:
* Faster configuration due to one less subconfigure being run during `./configure` i.e 22s with this PR vs 26s
* Faster autoconf i.e 13s with this PR vs 17s
* Improved caching
* No more issues with compiler flags i.e https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12467
* More direct control means we can build exactly the objects we want
There might be one argument against making this change, which is that builders should have the option to use "proper shared/system libraries". However, I think that falls down for a few reasons. The first being that we already don't support building with a number of system libraries (secp256k1, leveldb, crc32c); some for good reason. Univalue is really the odd one out at the moment.
Note that the only fork of Core I'm aware of, that actively patches in support for using system libs, also explicitly marks them as ["DANGEROUS"](a886811721/configure.ac (L1430)) and ["NOT SUPPORTED"](a886811721/configure.ac (L1312)). So it would seem they exist more to satisfy a distro requirement, as opposed to something that anyone should, or would actually use in practice.
PRs like #22412 highlight the "issue" with us operating with our own Univalue fork, where we actively fix bugs, and make improvements, when upstream (https://github.com/jgarzik/univalue) may not be taking those improvements, and by all accounts, is not currently actively maintained. Bitcoin Core should not be hamstrung into not being able to fix bugs in a library, and/or have to litter our source with "workarounds", i.e #22412, for bugs we've already fixed, based on the fact that an upstream project is not actively being maintained. Allowing builders to use system libs is really only exacerbating this problem, with little benefit to our project. Bitcoin Core is not quite like your average piece of distro packaged software.
There is the potential for us to give the same treatment to libsecp256k1, however it seems doing that is currently less straightforward.
ACKs for top commit:
dongcarl:
ACK 0f95247246 less my comment above, always nice to have an include-able `sources.mk` which makes integration easier.
theuni:
ACK 0f95247246. Thanks fanquake for keeping this going.
Tree-SHA512: a7f2e41ee7cba06ae72388638e86b264eca1b9a8b81c15d1d7b45df960c88c3b91578b4ade020f8cc61d75cf8d16914575f9a78fa4cef9c12be63504ed804b99
5c34507ecb core_write: Rename calculate_fee to have_undo for clarity (fyquah)
8edf6204a8 release-notes: Add release note about getblock verbosity level 3. (fyquah)
459104b2aa rest: Add test for prevout fields in getblock (fyquah)
4330af6f72 rpc: Add test for level 3 verbosity getblock rpc call. (fyquah)
51dbc167e9 rpc: Add level 3 verbosity to getblock RPC call. (fyquah)
3cc95345ca rpc: Replace boolean argument for tx details with enum class. (fyquah)
Pull request description:
Author of #21245 expressed [time issues](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21245#issuecomment-902332088) in the original PR. Given that #21245 has received a lot of review*, I have decided to open this new pull request with [modifications required to get ACK from luke-jr ](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21245#issuecomment-905150806) and a few nits of mine.
### Original PR description
> Display the prevout in transaction inputs when calling getblock level 3 verbosity. This PR affects the existing `/rest/block` API by adding a `prevout` fields to tx inputs. This is mentioned in the change to the release notes.
>
> I added some functional tests that
>
> * checks that the RPC call still works when TxUndo can't be found
>
> * Doesn't display the "value" or "scriptPubKey" of the previous output when at a lower verbosity level
>
>
> This "completes" the issue #18771
### Possible improvements
* b0bf4f255f - I can include even this commit to this PR if deemed useful or I can leave it for a follow-up PR. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21245#issuecomment-894853784 for more context.
### Examples
Examples of the `getblock` output with various verbose levels. Note that `000000000000001f682b188971cc1a121546be4e9d5baf22934fdc7f538288d5` contains only 2 transactions.
#### Verbose level 0
```bash
./bitcoin-cli -testnet getblock 000000000000001f682b188971cc1a121546be4e9d5baf22934fdc7f538288d5 0
```
##### Verbose level 1
```bash
./bitcoin-cli -testnet getblock 000000000000001f682b188971cc1a121546be4e9d5baf22934fdc7f538288d5 1
```
##### Verbose level 2
```bash
./bitcoin-cli -testnet getblock 000000000000001f682b188971cc1a121546be4e9d5baf22934fdc7f538288d5 2
```
##### Verbose level 3
```bash
./bitcoin-cli -testnet getblock 000000000000001f682b188971cc1a121546be4e9d5baf22934fdc7f538288d5 3
```
#### REST
```bash
curl -H "content-type:text/plain;" http://127.0.0.1:18332/rest/block/000000000000001f682b188971cc1a121546be4e9d5baf22934fdc7f538288d5.json
```
<sub>* ... and my everyday obsessive checking of my email inbox whether the PR moves forward.</sub>
Edit laanwj: Removed at symbol from message, and large example output to prevent it from all ending up in the commit message.
ACKs for top commit:
0xB10C:
ACK 5c34507ecb
meshcollider:
utACK 5c34507ecb
theStack:
ACK 5c34507ecb👘
promag:
Concept ACK 5c34507ecb
Tree-SHA512: bbff120d8fd76e617b723b102b0c606e0d8eb27f21c631d5f4cdab0892137c4bc7c65b1df144993405f942c91be47a26e80480102af55bff22621c19f518aea3
The tracepoint `validation:block_connected` was introduced in #22006.
The first argument was the hash of the connected block as a pointer
to a C-like String. The last argument passed the hash of the
connected block as a pointer to 32 bytes. The hash was only passed as
string to allow `bpftrace` scripts to print the hash. It was
(incorrectly) assumed that `bpftrace` cannot hex-format and print the
block hash given only the hash as bytes.
The block hash can be printed in `bpftrace` by calling
`printf("%02x")` for each byte of the hash in an `unroll () {...}`.
By starting from the last byte of the hash, it can be printed in
big-endian (the block-explorer format).
```C
$p = $hash + 31;
unroll(32) {
$b = *(uint8*)$p;
printf("%02x", $b);
$p -= 1;
}
```
See also: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22902#discussion_r705176691
This is a breaking change to the block_connected tracepoint API, however
this tracepoint has not yet been included in a release.
The COIN constant is critical in understanding Bitcoin's supply, but what it represents isn't clear from the name of the constant. Adding a comment clarifies the meaning of the constant for future readers.
For the generic wallet tests, make DescriptorScriptPubKeyMans. There are
still some wallet tests that test legacy wallet things. Those remain
unchanged.
The subtract fee from outputs assumes that the leftover input amount
will be dropped to fees. However this only happens if that amount is
less than the cost of change. In the event that it is higher than the
cost of change, the leftover amount will actually become a change
output. To avoid this scenario, force a change type which has a high
cost of change.
To avoid issues with test data leaking across tests cases, the global
vCoins and testWallet are removed from coinselector_tests and all of the
relevant functions reworked to not need them.
6544ea5035 refactor: Block unsafe fs::path std::string conversion calls (Russell Yanofsky)
b39a477ec6 refactor: Add fs::PathToString, fs::PathFromString, u8string, u8path functions (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
The `fs::path` class has a `std::string` constructor which will implicitly convert from strings. Implicit conversions like this are not great in general because they can hide complexity and inefficiencies in the code, but this case is especially bad, because after the transition from `boost::filesystem` to `std::filesystem` in #20744 the behavior of this constructor on windows will be more complicated and can mangle path strings. The `fs::path` class also has a `.string()` method which is inverse of the constructor and has the same problems.
Fix this by replacing the unsafe method calls with `PathToString` and `PathFromString` function calls, and by forbidding unsafe method calls in the future.
ACKs for top commit:
kiminuo:
ACK 6544ea5035
laanwj:
Code review ACK 6544ea5035
hebasto:
re-ACK 6544ea5035, only added `fsbridge_stem` test case, updated comment, and rebased since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22937#pullrequestreview-765503126) review. Verified with the following command:
Tree-SHA512: c36324740eb4ee55151146626166c00d5ccc4b6f3df777e75c112bcb4d1db436c1d9cc8c29a1e7fb96051457d317961ab42e6c380c3be2771d135771b2b49fa0
Presumably these stubs indicate to packagers that external leveldb is meant to
be supported in some way. It is not. Remove the stubs to avoid sending any
mixed messages.
6531599f42 test: Add check that newkeypool flushes change addresses too (Samuel Dobson)
84fa19c77a Add release notes for keypool flush changes (Samuel Dobson)
f9603ee4e0 Add test for flushing keypool with newkeypool (Samuel Dobson)
6f6f7bb36c Make legacy wallet upgrades from non-HD to HD always flush the keypool (Samuel Dobson)
2434b10781 Fix outdated keypool size default (Samuel Dobson)
22cc797ca5 Add newkeypool RPC to flush the keypool (Samuel Dobson)
Pull request description:
This PR makes two main changes:
1) Adds a new RPC `newkeypool` which will entirely flush and refill the keypool.
2) When upgradewallet is called on old, non-HD wallets upgrading them to HD, we now always flush the keypool and generate a new one, to immediately start using the HD generated keys.
This PR is motivated by a number of users with old, pre-compressed-key wallets upgrading them and being confused about why they still can't generate p2sh-segwit or bech32 addresses -- this is due to uncompressed keys remaining in the keypool post-upgrade and being illegal in these newer address formats. There is currently no easy way to flush the keypool other than to call `getnewaddress` a hundred/thousand times or an ugly hack of using a `sethdseed` call.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
re-ACK 6531599f42
meshcollider:
Added new commit 6531599f42 to avoid invalidating previous ACKs.
instagibbs:
ACK 6531599f42
Tree-SHA512: 50c79c5d42dd27ab0ecdbfdc4071fdaa1b2dbb2f9195ed325b007106ff19226419ce57fe5b1539c0c24101b12f5e034bbcfb7bbb0451b766cb1071295383d774
b5950dd59c validation: put coins cache write log into bench debug log (Anthony Towns)
31b2b802b5 blockstorage: use debug log category (Anthony Towns)
da94ebc2fa validation: move header validation error logging to VALIDATION debug category (Anthony Towns)
1d7d835ec3 validation: include block hash when reporting prev block not found errors (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
Moves the following log messages into debug log categories:
* "AcceptBlockHeader: ..." to validation
* "Prune: deleted blk/rev" to new blockstorage log category
* "Leaving block file" moves from validation to blockstorage
* "write coins cache to disk" to bench
Also adds the hash of the block to the log message when AcceptBlockHeader is rejecting because of problems with the prev block.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK b5950dd59c
Empact:
Code review ACK b5950dd59c
laanwj:
Code review ACK b5950dd59c
promag:
Code review ACK b5950dd59c.
meshcollider:
Code review ACK b5950dd59c
Tree-SHA512: a73fdbfe8d36da48a3e89c2d5e0b6a3c5045d280c1a57f61c38d0d21f4f198aece4bd85155be3439e179d5dabdb523bf15fa0395e0e3ceff19c878ba3112c840
ce69e18947 scripts: remove pixie.py (fanquake)
00b85d0b13 scripts: only parse the binary once in security-check.py (fanquake)
cad40a5b16 scripts: use LIEF for ELF checks in security-check.py (fanquake)
8242ae230e scripts: only parse the binary once in symbol-check.py (fanquake)
309eac9019 scripts: use LIEF for ELF checks in symbol-check.py (fanquake)
610a8a8e39 test-*-check: Pass in *FLAGS and compile with them (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
This finishes the transition to using LIEF for the ELF symbol and security checks.
Note that there's currently a work around used for identifying RISCV binaries (just checking the interpreter). I've sent a PR upstream, https://github.com/lief-project/LIEF/pull/562, and we should be able to drop that when using LIEF 0.12.0 and onwards.
ACKs for top commit:
dongcarl:
Code Review ACK ce69e18947
laanwj:
Code review ACK ce69e18947
Tree-SHA512: 911ba693cd9777ad1fc1f66dff6c4d3630a907351215380cbde5b14a4bbf5cf7eebf52eafa7e86b27deabd2d93d1b403f34aabd356b5ceaab3cc6e9941a01dd4
fa6f29de51 bitcoin-tx: Reject non-integral and out of range multisig numbers (MarcoFalke)
fafab8ea5e bitcoin-tx: Reject non-integral and out of range sequence ids (MarcoFalke)
fa53d3d826 test: Check that bitcoin-tx accepts whitespace around sequence id and multisig numbers (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Seems odd to silently accept arbitrary strings that don't even represent integral values.
Fix that.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK fa6f29de51
laanwj:
Code review ACK fa6f29de51
Empact:
Code review ACK fa6f29de51
promag:
Code review ACK fa6f29de51.
Tree-SHA512: e31f7f21fe55ac069e755557bdbcae8d5d29e20ff82e441ebdfc65153e3a31a4edd46ad3e6dea5190ecbd1b8ea5a8f94daa5d59a3b7558e46e794e30db0e6c79
7e88f61b28 multiprocess: Make interfaces::Chain::isTaprootActive non-const (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
`interfaces::Chain` is an abstract class, so declaring the method const would be exposing internal implementation details of subclasses to interface callers. And specifically this doesn't work because the multiprocess implementation of the `interfaces::Chain::isTaprootActive` method can't be const because IPC connection state and request state is not constant during the call.
---
This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10).
ACKs for top commit:
jamesob:
ACK 7e88f61b28
Tree-SHA512: 1c5ed89870aeb7170b9048c41299ab650dfa3d0978088e08c4c866fa0babb292722710b16f25540f26667220cb4747b1c256c4bd42893c552291eccc155346a3
fa4d0aacf2 test: * -> & (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This changes background_cs from being a pointer to a reference to work
around a gcc false warning. Also, this makes the test easier to read.
Fixes bitcoin#23101
Can be reviewed with --ignore-all-space.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK fa4d0aacf2
jamesob:
ACK fa4d0aacf2
hebasto:
ACK fa4d0aacf2, tested on Linux Mint 20.2 (x86_64) by merging this PR on top of the current master.
Tree-SHA512: 93a0d8859201f7074bea52fab8f6701409148bc50cfbb142cacfa6c991fc12c07584df04fead645f11703883df99535423d154f9945202e1c5aff49540d9b607
fa43e7c2d9 bitcoin-tx: Avoid treating overflow as OP_0 (MarcoFalke)
fa053c0019 style: Fix whitespace in Parse* functions (MarcoFalke)
fa03dec7e9 refactor: Use C++11 range based for loop in ParseScript (MarcoFalke)
fad55e79ca doc: Fixup ToIntegral docs (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Seems odd to treat integer overflow as `OP_0`, so fix that.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
re-ACK fa43e7c2d9
shaavan:
ACK fa43e7c2d9
Tree-SHA512: 1bbe2de62d853badc18d57d169c6e78ddcdff037e5a85357995dead11c8e67a4fe35087e08a181c60753f8ce91058b7fcc06f5b7901afedc78fbacea8bc3ef4f
