0d9fdd329e test, doc: refer to the correct variable names in p2p_invalid_tx.py (aitorjs)
Pull request description:
_tx_orphan_no_fee_ and _tx_orphan_invalid_ don't exist as transactions.
Have been replaced by _tx_orphan_2_no_fee_ and _tx_orphan_2_invalid_ respectively.
**Motivation**: Comments are more accurate and easy understandable under the tests context (I think).
ACKs for top commit:
kristapsk:
utACK 0d9fdd329e
theStack:
ACK 0d9fdd329e📃
Tree-SHA512: a4cafd931e51fe2a67085e10e9c61178c864c14982664d112b76327e040af08cd1de04eca4a8ae980fad57ba7078017ce02fc60e7658f38380e8172c2ae28b77
127b4608e9 test: Check if specified config file cannot be opened (nthumann)
6bb54708e6 util: Check if specified config file cannot be opened (nthumann)
Pull request description:
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22612.
When running e.g. `./src/bitcoind -datadir=/tmp/bitcoin -regtest -conf=/tmp/bitcoin/regtest/bitcoin.conf` and the specified config cannot be opened (doesn't exist, permission denied, ...), the initialization silently uses the default config.
As voidburn already noted:
> I can't think of a situation in which a config file is specified explicitly (in the startup options, as per service unit linked above), but inaccessible, where the fail condition should be to keep booting using defaults instead.
With this patch applied, the initialization will fail immediately, if the specified config file cannot be opened. If no config file is explicitly specified, the behavior is unchanged. This not only affects `bitcoind`, but also `bitcoin-cli` and `bitcoin-qt`.
In the example below the datadir is accessible, but the config file is not due to insufficient permissions:
```
$ ./src/bitcoind -datadir=/tmp/bitcoin -regtest --debug=1 -conf=/tmp/bitcoin/regtest/bitcoin.conf
Error: Error reading configuration file: specified config file "/tmp/bitcoin/regtest/bitcoin.conf" could not be opened.
```
ACKs for top commit:
0xB10C:
ACK 127b4608e9
Zero-1729:
tACK 127b4608e9
theStack:
Tested ACK 127b4608e9
Tree-SHA512: 4fe487921485426f1d1da8d256c388af517b984b639d776aec7b159b3e23b669824093d3bdd31139d9415ed5f5de405b3e6a51b110c8ab471f12b9c99ac67cc1
a3b559c970 test: added test for disabled wallet (Shubhankar Gambhir)
Pull request description:
This PR enables a part of the non-wallet functional test (rpc_signmessage.py) to be run even with the Bitcoin Core wallet disabled, it is inspired by #20078.
Divided tests in rpc_signmessage.py into 2 files wallet_signmessagewithaddress.py and rpc_signmessagewithprivkey.py, latter one can run even when wallet is disabled that provides extra test which was not performed earlier.
* we need bitcoincore wallet to run rpc_signmessage.py, but it is olny required for signing messages with address and not for signing messages wih private key, so latter one can be in a seperate test which can run without wallet
* verifying message doesn't require wallet, so it can be used in both tests without any problem
* 2 tests are named as wallet_signmessagewithaddress.py and rpc_signmessagewithprivkey.py to provide clarity of what they are testing.
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
ACK a3b559c970
theStack:
Code-review ACK a3b559c970
Tree-SHA512: 1bfca3baf3123a02f0a2389e55e141d64430c3bed40ff5a5fb97ef2c66e2853c46e4b2dff62b948eb94dc574cb89d061769330f0535e2d5d1be76b60101136ac
fab2e23b57 Use generate* from TestFramework (MarcoFalke)
faf7e92804 test: Add generate* calls to test framework (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This is needed for #22567.
By making the calls to `generate*` member function of the test framework, it paves the way to make it easier to implicitly call the `sync_all` member function.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK fab2e23b57
Tree-SHA512: 7a7be6be71f0602119689df45d63a1adec309f323eac2330ee0f200676001afe825605859bd02c6a8a8dcf85d925dc1bc37370ef1ceb8ad1d85a66eec0dbfff9
021daedfa1 refactor: replace remaining binascii method calls (Zero-1729)
Pull request description:
This PR removes the remaining `binascii` method calls outside `test/functional` and `test_framework`, as pointed out here https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22619#pullrequestreview-722153458.
Follow-up to #22593 and #22619Closes#22605
ACKs for top commit:
josibake:
re-ACK 021daedfa1
theStack:
re-ACK 021daedfa1
Tree-SHA512: 2ae9fee8917112c91a5406f219ca70f24cd8902b903db5a61fc2de85ad640d669a772f5c05970be0fcee6ef1cdd32fae2ca5d1ec6dc9798b43352c8160ddde6f
47c48b5f35 test: only use verbose for getrawmempool when necessary in functional tests (Michael Dietz)
77349713b1 test: use getmempoolentry instead of getrawmempool in functional tests when appropriate (Michael Dietz)
86dbd54ae8 test: improve mempool_updatefrom efficiency by using getmempoolentry for specific txns (Michael Dietz)
Pull request description:
I don't think this changes the intention of the test. But it does shave ~30 seconds off the time it takes to run. From what I've seen our CI `macOS 11 native [gui] [no depends]` runs `mempool_updatefrom.py` in ~135 seconds. After this PR it should run in ~105 seconds
I noticed this improvement should probably be made when testing performance/runtimes of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22698. But I wanted to separate this out from that PR so the affects of each is decoupled
Edit: The major change in this PR is improving mempool_updatefrom.py's runtime as this is a very long running test. Then made the same efficiency improvements across all the functional tests as it made since to do that here
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
Tested ACK 47c48b5f35
Tree-SHA512: 40f553715f3d4649dc18c2738554eafaca9ea800c4b028c099217896cc1c466ff457ae814d59cf8564c782a8964d8fac3eda60c1b6ffb08bbee1439b2d34434b
e2ff385e13 test: check for invalid `-prune` parameters (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This small PR adds missing test coverage for invalid `-prune` parameter values / combinations:
77e23ca945/src/init.cpp (L926-L928)77e23ca945/src/init.cpp (L935-L937)77e23ca945/src/init.cpp (L844-L849)
Not sure if the tests fit into `feature_config_args.py` or should rather be moved into `feature_pruning.py`; the latter though seems to be run less often due to being very memory-hungry.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK e2ff385e13
Tree-SHA512: bb0db98090058ecac9f8a01301634e9dba9a65fd56b6a0b770f88da28c4f01e240e22b1225f0d231e28bdd4b5b51bff0e6853cccc46ed0190e91b84f7954a9db
92885c4f69 test: Test for ApproximateBestSubset edge case with too little fees (Andrew Chow)
d9262324e8 wallet: Assert that enough was selected to cover the fees (Andrew Chow)
2de222c401 wallet: Use GetSelectionAmount for target value calculations (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
The `m_value` used for the target calculation in `ApproximateBestSubset` is incorrect, it should be `GetSelectionAmount`. This causes a bug that is only apparent when the minimum relay fee is set to be very high.
A test case is added for this, in addition to an assert in `CreateTransactionInternal` that would have also caught this issue if someone were able to hit the edge case.
Fixes#22670
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK 92885c4f69
Tree-SHA512: bd61fa61ffb60873e097737eebea3afe8a42296ba429de9038b3a4706763b34de9409de6cdbab21ff7f51f4787b503f840873182d9c4a1d6e12a54b017953547
5fe8100ff3 Change the wallet_backup.py test to use the restorewallet RPC command instead of restoring wallets manually. (lsilva01)
ae23faba6f Add a new RPC command: restorewallet (lsilva01)
Pull request description:
As far as I know, there is no command to restore the wallet from a backup file.
The only way to do this is to replace the `wallet.dat` of a newly created wallet with the backup file, which is hardly an intuitive way.
This PR implements the `restorewallet` RPC command which restores the wallet from the backup file.
To test:
First create a backup file:
`$ bitcoin-cli -rpcwallet="wallet-01" backupwallet /home/Backups/wallet-01.bak`
Then restore it in another wallet:
`$ bitcoin-cli restorewallet "restored-wallet-01" /home/Backups/wallet-01.bak`
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 5fe8100ff3
prayank23:
tACK 5fe8100ff3
meshcollider:
utACK 5fe8100ff3
Tree-SHA512: 9639df4d8ad32f255f5b868320dc69878bd9aceb3b471b49dfad500b67681e2d354292b5410982fbf18e25a44ed0c06fd4a0dd010e82807c2e00ff32e84047a1
d930c7f5b0 p2p, rpc, test: address rate-limiting follow-ups (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Incorporates review feedback in #22387.
Edit, could be considered separately: should a release note (or two) be added for 22.0? e.g. the new getpeerinfo fields in `Updated RPCs` and the rate-limiting itself in `P2P and network changes`.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK d930c7f5b0
theStack:
re-ACK d930c7f5b0🌮
Zero-1729:
crACK d930c7f
Tree-SHA512: b2101cad87f59c238603f38bd8e8df7a4d48929794e4de9e0e0ff2afa935a68475c2d369aa669d124a0bec2f50280fb47e8b980bde6ad812db08cf67b71c066a
ApproximateBestSubset had an edge case (due to not using
GetSelectionAmount) where it was possible for it to return success but
fail to select enough to cover transaction fees. A test is added that
could trigger this failure prior to the fix being implemented.
Divided tests in rpc_signmessage.py into 2 files wallet_signmessagewithaddress.py and
rpc_signmessagewithprivkey.py, latter one can run even when wallet is disabled.
fafe896a0b test: Set regtest.BIP66Height = 102 to speed up tests (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
No need to waste time by forcing creation of more than 1000 blocks to get the benefits of being able to test BIP 66. Also, reducing the height makes it more likely that (third-party) tests are conforming to BIP 66, which is enforced on mainnet for all new blocks.
ACKs for top commit:
GeneFerneau:
Concept + code review ACK [fafe896](fafe896a0b)
0xB10C:
crACK fafe896a0b
laanwj:
ACK fafe896a0b
Zero-1729:
tACK fafe896
kristapsk:
ACK fafe896a0b. Full functional test suite showed few second speed incrase on my laptop (although I didn't do proper benchmarking with multiple runs, just single `time ./test/functional/test_runner.py` on current master vs this PR).
theStack:
Tested ACK fafe896a0b
hg333:
tACK fafe896a0b
Tree-SHA512: 4bbee3c8587d612e74a59fde49b6439c1296f2fc27d3a7cf59a35e920f729fdd581c930290bd04def618f81412236676ddb99b4ceb4d80dfb9fd610b128a04b1
accf3d5868 [test] mempool package ancestor/descendant limits (glozow)
2b6b26e57c [test] parameterizable fee for make_chain and create_child_with_parents (glozow)
313c09f7b7 [test] helper function to increase transaction weight (glozow)
f8253d69d6 extract/rename helper functions from rpc_packages.py (glozow)
3cd663a5d3 [policy] ancestor/descendant limits for packages (glozow)
c6e016aa13 [mempool] check ancestor/descendant limits for packages (glozow)
f551841d3e [refactor] pass size/count instead of entry to CalculateAncestorsAndCheckLimits (glozow)
97dd1c729d MOVEONLY: add helper function for calculating ancestors and checking limits (glozow)
f95bbf58aa misc package validation doc improvements (glozow)
Pull request description:
This PR implements a function to calculate mempool ancestors for a package and enforces ancestor/descendant limits on them as a whole. It reuses a portion of `CalculateMemPoolAncestors()`; there's also a small refactor to move the reused code into a generic helper function. Instead of calculating ancestors and descendants on every single transaction in the package and their ancestors, we use a "worst case" heuristic, treating every transaction in the package as each other's ancestor and descendant. This may overestimate everyone's counts, but is still pretty accurate in the our main package use cases, in which at least one of the transactions in the package is directly related to all the others (e.g. 1 parent + 1 child, multiple parents with 1 child, or chains).
Note on Terminology: While "package" is often used to describe groups of related transactions _within_ the mempool, here, I only use package to mean the group of not-in-mempool transactions we are currently validating.
#### Motivation
It would be a potential DoS vector to allow submission of packages to mempool without a proper guard for mempool ancestors/descendants. In general, the purpose of mempool ancestor/descendant limits is to limit the computational complexity of dealing with families during removals and additions. We want to be able to validate multiple transactions on top of the mempool, but also avoid these scenarios:
- We underestimate the ancestors/descendants during package validation and end up with extremely complex families in our mempool (potentially a DoS vector).
- We expend an unreasonable amount of resources calculating everyone's ancestors and descendants during package validation.
ACKs for top commit:
JeremyRubin:
utACK accf3d5
ariard:
ACK accf3d5.
Tree-SHA512: 0d18ce4b77398fe872e0b7c2cc66d3aac2135e561b64029584339e1f4de2a6a16ebab3dd5784f376e119cbafc4d50168b28d3bd95d0b3d01158714ade2e3624d
bb822a7af8 wallet, rpc: add listdescriptors private option (S3RK)
Pull request description:
Rationale: make it possible to backup your wallet with `listdescriptors` command
* The default behaviour is still to show public version
* For private version only the root xprv is returned
Example use-case:
```
> bitcoin-cli -regtest -named createwallet wallet_name=old descriptors=true
> bitcoin-cli -regtest -rpcwallet=old listdescriptors true | jq '.descriptors' > descriptors.txt
> bitcoin-cli -regtest -named createwallet wallet_name=new descriptors=true blank=true
> bitcoin-cli -regtest -rpcwallet=new importdescriptors "$(cat descriptors.txt)"
```
In case of watch-only wallet without private keys there will be following output:
```
error code: -4
error message:
Can't get descriptor string.
```
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK bb822a7af8
Rspigler:
tACK bb822a7af8
jonatack:
ACK bb822a7af8 per `git diff 2854ddc bb822a7`
prayank23:
tACK bb822a7af8
meshcollider:
Code review ACK bb822a7af8
Tree-SHA512: f6dddc72a74e5667071ccd77f8dce578382e8e29e7ed6a0834ac2e114a6d3918b59c2f194f4079b3259e13d9ba3b4f405619940c3ecb7a1a0344615aed47c43d
