c28d461834 doc: move errant release note to doc/ (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Release note from #26646 should be in doc/.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 741323c0bc526163d65e441c9e677ee3613ed0c55b1880b99fb63b0f3306aeca0cad83dadef05c23def8d0fc6a224956b27ae1bf4b1ff980a1be2d31feef7e3d
94d0c418c5 build: remove already tested headers from AC_CHECK_HEADERS (fanquake)
Pull request description:
These headers are already included in a default set which are checked early during configure.
We already use at least sys/types.h and unistd.h unconditionally in configure.
ACKs for top commit:
TheCharlatan:
Code review ACK 94d0c418c5
Tree-SHA512: d81ce01d46ef1c226b19a4b906e5b622baeee62f04d75eebd02094585ad4712a6c830314227d3a1c03a5f76be5c659b456bb065c175e3cf391e0ece37fd99ead
f9ce0eadf4 For feebump, ignore abandoned descendant spends (John Moffett)
Pull request description:
Closes#26667
To be eligible for fee-bumping, a transaction must not have any of its outputs (eg - change) spent in other unconfirmed transactions in the wallet. This behavior is currently [enforced](9e229a542f/src/wallet/feebumper.cpp (L25-L28)) and [tested](9e229a542f/test/functional/wallet_bumpfee.py (L270-L286)).
However, this check shouldn't apply to spends in abandoned descendant transactions, as explained by #26667.
`CWallet::IsSpent` already carves out an exception for abandoned transactions, so we can just use that.
I've also added a new test to cover this case.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-utACK f9ce0eadf4
achow101:
ACK f9ce0eadf4
furszy:
ACK f9ce0ead
Tree-SHA512: 19d957d1cf6747668bb114e27a305027bfca5a9bed2b1d9cc9e1b0bd4666486c7c4b60b045a7fe677eb9734d746f5de76390781fb1e9e0bceb4a46d20acd1749
04528054fc [bench] BlockAssembler with mempool packages (glozow)
6ce265acf4 [test util] lock cs_main before pool.cs in PopulateMempool (glozow)
8791410662 [test util] randomize fee in PopulateMempool (glozow)
cba5934eb6 [miner] allow bypassing TestBlockValidity (glozow)
c058852308 [refactor] parameterize BlockAssembler::Options in PrepareBlock (glozow)
a2de971ba1 [refactor] add helper to apply ArgsManager to BlockAssembler::Options (glozow)
Pull request description:
Performance of block template building matters as miners likely want to be able to start mining on a block with transactions asap after a block is found. We would want to know if a mempool PR accidentally caused, for example, a 100x slowdown. An `AssembleBlock()` bench exists, but it operates on a mempool with 101 transactions, each with 0 ancestors or descendants and with the same fee. Adding a bench with a more complex mempool is useful because (1) it's more realistic (2) updating packages can potentially cause the algorithm to take a long time.
ACKs for top commit:
kevkevinpal:
Tested ACK [0452805](04528054fc)
achow101:
ACK 04528054fc
stickies-v:
ACK 04528054f
Tree-SHA512: 38c138d6a75616651f9b1faf4e3a1cd833437a486f4e84308fbee958e8462bb570582c88f7ba7ab99d80191e97855ac2cf27c43cc21585d3e4b0e227effe2fb5
0f5fc4f656 doc: fix up -netinfo relaytxes help (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Addresses https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26109#discussion_r995502563 by Marco Falke (thanks!)
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK 0f5fc4f656
Tree-SHA512: d7345d1a94b15c4ec1a2bb0be5c04c472411d90cefb4c16ed524933d2bfc36816bb7519c2e109b2e41ff451b039dd2ddaa6d5db917ad54745332f2a1d8b85570
c467cfffce test: add coverage for `purpose` arg in `listlabels` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for `listlabels` command when specifying the `purpose` (send and receive).
dcdfd72861/src/wallet/rpc/addresses.cpp (L698-L704)
ACKs for top commit:
kristapsk:
ACK c467cfffce
Tree-SHA512: 7e7143c1264692f7b22952e7c70dbe9ed3f5dcd2e3b69962a47be9f9c21b3f4a9089ca87962fbc8ff9116e7d2dbeb7f36d6a132c9ac13724a255cfe1b32373a8
264f9ef17f [validation] return MempoolAcceptResult for every tx on PCKG_TX failure (glozow)
dae81e01e8 [refactor] rename variables in AcceptPackage for clarity (glozow)
da484bc738 [doc] release note effective-feerate and effective-includes RPC results (glozow)
5eab397b98 [validation] remove PackageMempoolAcceptResult::m_package_feerate (glozow)
601bac88cb [rpc] return effective-includes in testmempoolaccept and submitpackage (glozow)
1691eaa818 [rpc] return effective-feerate in testmempoolaccept and submitpackage (glozow)
d6c7b78ef2 [validation] return wtxids of other transactions whose fees were used (glozow)
1605886380 [validation] return effective feerate from mempool validation (glozow)
5d35b4a7de [test] package validation quits early due to non-policy, non-missing-inputs failure (glozow)
be2e4d94e5 [validation] when quitting early in AcceptPackage, set package_state and tx result (glozow)
Pull request description:
This PR fixes a bug and improves the mempool accept interface to return information more predictably.
Bug: In package validation, we first try the transactions individually (see doc/policy/packages.md for more explanation) and, if they all failed for missing inputs and policy-related (i.e. fee) reasons, we'll try package validation. Otherwise, we'll just "quit early" since, for example, if a transaction had an invalid signature, adding a child will not help make it valid. Currently, when we quit early, we're not setting the `package_state` to be invalid, so the caller might think it succeeded. Also, we're returning no results - it makes more sense to return the individual transaction failure. Thanks instagibbs for catching https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25038#discussion_r1013293248!
Also, make the package results interface generally more useful/predictable:
- Always return the feerate at which a transaction was considered for `CheckFeeRate` in `MempoolAcceptResult::m_effective_feerate` when it was successful. This can replace the current `PackageMempoolAcceptResult::m_package_feerate`, which only sometimes exists.
- Always provide an entry for every transaction in `PackageMempoolAcceptResult::m_tx_results` when the error is `PCKG_TX`.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
reACK 264f9ef17f
achow101:
ACK 264f9ef17f
naumenkogs:
reACK 264f9ef17f
Tree-SHA512: ce7fd9927a80030317cc6157822596e85a540feff5dbf5eea7c62da2eb50c917cdddc9da1e2ff62cc18b98b27d360151811546bd9d498859679a04bbee090837
In the case of `i2pacceptincoming=0` we use transient addresses
(destinations) for ourselves for each outbound connection. It may
happen that we
* create the session (and thus our address/destination too)
* fail to connect to the particular peer (e.g. if they are offline)
* dispose the unused session.
This puts unnecessary load on the I2P network because session creation
is not cheap. Is exaggerated if `onlynet=i2p` is used in which case we
will be trying to connect to I2P peers more often.
To help with this, save the created but unused sessions and pick them
later instead of creating new ones.
Alleviates: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/26754
DOCKER in names is confusingly used as synonym for "image", "container",
and "ci". Fix the confusion by picking the term that fits the context.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
ren() { sed -i "s:$1:$2:g" $( git grep -l "$1" ) ; }
ren DOCKER_PACKAGES CI_BASE_PACKAGES
# This better reflects that they are the common base for all CI
# containers.
ren DOCKER_ID CI_CONTAINER_ID
# This is according to the documentation of "--detach , -d: Run
# container in background and print container ID".
ren DOCKER_NAME_TAG CI_IMAGE_NAME_TAG
# This avoids confusing with CONTAINER_NAME and clarifies that it is an
# image.
ren DOCKER_ADMIN CI_CONTAINER_CAP
# This clarifies that it is a capability added to the container.
ren DOCKER_CI_CMD_PREFIX CI_EXEC_CMD_PREFIX
# This brings it in line with the CI_EXEC naming.
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
3784009534 wallet: Skip rescanning if wallet is more recent than tip (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
If a wallet has key birthdates that are more recent than the currrent chain tip, or a bestblock height higher than the current tip, we should not attempt to rescan as there is nothing to scan for.
Fixes#26655
ACKs for top commit:
ishaanam:
re-utACK 3784009534
w0xlt:
utACK 3784009534
furszy:
Code review ACK 37840095
Tree-SHA512: f0d90b62940d97d50f21e1e01fa6dcb54409fad819cea4283612825c4d93d733df323cd92787fed43956b0a8e386a5bf88218f1f5749c913398667a5c8f54470
When an orphaned coinbase is reorged back into the main chain, any
unconfirmed ancestors should still be marked as abandoned due to the
original reorg that orphaned that coinbase.
65e78bda7c test: Invalid label name coverage (Aurèle Oulès)
552b51e682 refactor: Add sanity checks in LabelFromValue (Aurèle Oulès)
67e7ba8e1a rpc: Sanitize label name in various RPCs (Aurèle Oulès)
Pull request description:
The following RPCs did not sanitize the optional label name:
- importprivkey
- importaddress
- importpubkey
- importmulti
- importdescriptors
- listsinceblock
Thus is was possible to import an address with a label `*` which should not be possible.
The wildcard label is used for backwards compatibility in the `listtransactions` rpc.
I added test coverage for these RPCs.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK 65e78bda7c
achow101:
ACK 65e78bda7c
furszy:
diff ACK 65e78bd
stickies-v:
re-ACK 65e78bda7c
theStack:
re-ACK 65e78bda7c
Tree-SHA512: ad99f2824d4cfae352166b76da4ca0069b7c2eccf81aaa0654be25bbb3c6e5d6b005d93960f3f4154155f80e12be2d0cebd5529922ae3d2a36ee4eed82440b31
3076f1815d doc: net: fix link to onion address encoding scheme [ONIONADDRESS] (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Instead of referring to a fixed line number to a file in master (which is obviously always quickly outdated), use a permalink tied to the latest commit.
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
ACK 3076f1815d
Tree-SHA512: 7070a7e47d683b1539f33daa4c67093a87d6121a84430a3b24afee139a7f2b3cab32fcdf0bc561f8e177b5ba864a98e4491e08dac90cdd4bd2e4e6b8fa7e4b14
Instead of referring to a fixed line number to a file in master (which
is obviously always quickly outdated), use a permalink tied to the
latest commit.
fae885b98f ci: Run one task with all tests on credits (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This should allow to detect any obvious issues in the tests within 10 minutes of opening a pull request, regardless of the current scheduling load on the Cirrus CI community cluster.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fae885b98f
Tree-SHA512: 384651364648cd38a126f64a5cc650dd396735c05f7d8b5d5c9a8ee7b3b98e36f5dfb3b1c0563ba4d9f554b5e0e82e13aa38e78092f11856a82fc76270fe6f3e
This makes the interface more predictable and useful. The caller
understands one or more transactions failed, and can learn what happened
with each transaction. We already have this information, so we might as
well return it.
It doesn't make sense to do this for other PackageValidationResult
values because:
- PCKG_RESULT_UNSET: this means everything succeeded, so the individual
failures are no longer accurate.
- PCKG_MEMPOOL_ERROR: something went wrong with the mempool logic;
transaction failures might not be meaningful.
- PCKG_POLICY: this means something was wrong with the package as a
whole. The caller should use the PackageValidationState to find the
error, rather than looking at individual MempoolAcceptResults.
This value creates an extremely confusing interface as its existence is
dependent upon implementation details (whether something was submitted
on its own, etc). MempoolAcceptResult::m_effective_feerate is much more
helpful, as it always exists for submitted transactions.
fadfae42f1 ci: Remove unused busybox workaround (MarcoFalke)
fac424fce7 ci: Create named symbol for BINS_SCRATCH_DIR (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
It can be re-added when it is needed again. But it may be more likely that the other workarounds can be removed as well, in a follow-up.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fadfae42f1
Tree-SHA512: 39984d02ddcba907a5b780fd9cb4dab7f1abbc32468968b4862d226de2e4f95c71708c7361db97347e1ac65196dc40d379e68f34bef37d42b5464d343e7466d8
In certain circumstances, the GUI console will display
the message 'Executing command without any wallet' when
it is, in fact, using the default wallet.
In RPC calls, if no wallet is explicitly selected and
there is exactly one wallet loaded, the default is to
act on that loaded wallet.
The GUI console acts that way in reality, but
erroneously reports that it's not acting on any
particular wallet.
abccb27466 test: add coverage for absolute timestamp in `setban` (brunoerg)
b99f1f20f7 p2p, rpc: don't allow past absolute timestamp in `setban` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
We shouldn't allow call `setban` with past absolute timestamp. First, because doesn't make sense to ban a node until ~ past ~. Besides that, it could make an unnecessary write to the DB since `BanMan::Ban` calls `DumpBanlist` and it calls `SweepBanned` which will remove this new ban (because of the timestamp) of the array.
ACKs for top commit:
1440000bytes:
ACK abccb27466
Tree-SHA512: 6d0cadf99fc4f78d77d3bafd6f5c85ac56e243ebc376210fdb2bee751e7b139ec7d6f5f346317fd0b10051b685f2d0ee1d8e40f4bc10f4dbdbbddd5e1ee84de5
fa4e98c77f ci: Fix ci_native_fuzz_msan CONTAINER_NAME (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This avoids a duplicate name with the other msan task, which will lead to errors when running locally:
> Error: creating container storage: the container name "ci_native_msan" is already in use by 77350e26f9c36abbb601140cd0b485ead093ff118803c720ca8b10f6bdfa37d2. You have to remove that container to be able to reuse that name: that name is already in use
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fa4e98c77f
hebasto:
ACK fa4e98c77f, I've verified that there are no other duplicated `CONTAINER_NAME`'s values.
Tree-SHA512: f1b28b21302c0947912d642c12c2ccad236af6824fd27e68341baddedec24087af738f3226028a0eeb6e0fc7e9f90713fc680855eeb07adc113c4f6e8b03a545
Since Nagle's algorithm is disabled, each and every call to send(2) can potentially generate a separate TCP segment on the wire. This is especially inefficient when sending the tiny header preceding each message payload.
Linux implements a MSG_MORE flag that tells the kernel not to push the passed data immediately to the connected peer but rather to collect it in the socket's internal transmit buffer where it can be combined with data from successive calls to send(2). Where available, specify this flag when calling send(2) in CConnman::SocketSendData(CNode &) if the data buffer being sent is not the last one in node.vSendMsg.
