Commit graph

3092 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
merge-script
96a5cd8000
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#32293: doc: Add deps install notes for multiprocess
Some checks are pending
CI / test each commit (push) Waiting to run
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, no depends, sqlite only, gui (push) Waiting to run
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, fuzz (push) Waiting to run
CI / Windows native, VS 2022 (push) Waiting to run
CI / Windows native, fuzz, VS 2022 (push) Waiting to run
CI / Linux->Windows cross, no tests (push) Waiting to run
CI / Windows, test cross-built (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / ASan + LSan + UBSan + integer, no depends, USDT (push) Waiting to run
7f5a35cf4b doc: Add deps install notes for multiprocess (TheCharlatan)

Pull request description:

  These just mirror the content in src/ipc/libmultiprocess/doc/install.md

ACKs for top commit:
  Sjors:
    re-ACK 7f5a35cf4b
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK 7f5a35cf4b just dropping dependencies.md update since last review

Tree-SHA512: f9bf4f54542323aa4a0600db874640e575e40355f08515331a27fb139e6e47ee58aa0c6635206f978696e3da7b5aa93efb45b181b02e99e308537fcb90bd6751
2025-04-22 13:16:08 +01:00
Ava Chow
06439a14c8
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#31953: rpc: Allow fullrbf fee bump in (psbt)bumpfee
Some checks are pending
CI / test each commit (push) Waiting to run
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, no depends, sqlite only, gui (push) Waiting to run
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, fuzz (push) Waiting to run
CI / Windows native, VS 2022 (push) Waiting to run
CI / Windows native, fuzz, VS 2022 (push) Waiting to run
CI / Linux->Windows cross, no tests (push) Waiting to run
CI / Windows, test cross-built (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / ASan + LSan + UBSan + integer, no depends, USDT (push) Waiting to run
fa86190e6e rpc: Allow fullrbf fee bump (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  The RPCs (psbt)bumpfee, and the GUI, reject fee bumps when BIP 125 signalling is absent in the transaction even when the mempool and other RPCs allow them. Fix the confusion by allowing the fee bump.

  This is done after fullrbf is always on (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30592)

ACKs for top commit:
  1440000bytes:
    reACK fa86190e6e
  achow101:
    ACK fa86190e6e
  w0xlt:
    ACK fa86190e6e
  rkrux:
    reACK fa86190e6e
  glozow:
    ACK fa86190e6e

Tree-SHA512: b2ffe8dcadbe71e9be767a16cf8aa0bf383c2de7aa1aee9438d125f444e24f3f7e4f02ddb28981bd3b8b645b6a24a407b4ad6bb0b21946ae637e78f6386e05bf
2025-04-21 13:25:52 -07:00
TheCharlatan
7f5a35cf4b
doc: Add deps install notes for multiprocess
These just mirror the content in src/ipc/libmultiprocess/doc/install.md
2025-04-17 20:26:43 +02:00
MarcoFalke
fa86190e6e
rpc: Allow fullrbf fee bump
Also, fix the incorrect documention of the 'replaceable' RPC argument
with respect to sequence number handling. The docs were incorrect
before, so the fix could be extracted, but it seems fine to include here
as well.
2025-04-17 13:12:26 +02:00
merge-script
06f9ead9f9
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#32271: doc: Document WITH_EXTERNAL_LIBMULTIPROCESS build option better
9ccee9cd02 doc: Document WITH_EXTERNAL_LIBMULTIPROCESS build option better (Ryan Ofsky)

Pull request description:

  This includes a cmake documentation change suggested https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31741#discussion_r2039716492 and another change to mention the option in markdown documentation

ACKs for top commit:
  hebasto:
    ACK 9ccee9cd02, changes look good.
  TheCharlatan:
    ACK 9ccee9cd02

Tree-SHA512: c9103b001b970ac57afedc6dc384091f5661975d569573e93003cbd7df1891c54cefb06d7296eac5b9a5c57251803dcab2bd3b26c9d81aa476c62f211dcb3d6e
2025-04-17 11:41:06 +01:00
Ava Chow
e66e30c9e5
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#31862: doc: Fix and clarify description of ZMQ message format
Some checks are pending
CI / test each commit (push) Waiting to run
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, no depends, sqlite only, gui (push) Waiting to run
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, fuzz (push) Waiting to run
CI / Windows native, VS 2022 (push) Waiting to run
CI / Windows native, fuzz, VS 2022 (push) Waiting to run
CI / Linux->Windows cross, no tests (push) Waiting to run
CI / Windows, test cross-built (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / ASan + LSan + UBSan + integer, no depends, USDT (push) Waiting to run
7a93544cdc doc: Fix and clarify description of ZMQ message format (Jiri Jakes)

Pull request description:

  This change stresses that all ZMQ messages share the same structure and that they differ only in the format of the bodies. Previously this was not clear.

  Further it removes the notion of endianness of 32-byte hashes, as it was misleading, and replaces it with the term 'reversed byte order' (as opposed to natural or normal byte order produced by hashing functions).

  Additionally, it states that ZMQ 32-byte hashes are in the same format as in RPC. Previously it incorrectly stated that the two were in different formats.

  [Rendered](https://github.com/jirijakes/bitcoin/blob/zmq-doc/doc/zmq.md).

  Fixes #31856.

ACKs for top commit:
  w0xlt:
    Code review ACK 7a93544cdc
  achow101:
    ACK 7a93544cdc
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK 7a93544cdc. Nice changes. Documentation seems less repetitive and easier to understand now

Tree-SHA512: 8c5ab047c5fd9b5b6910d691b725886d7743dfd01510735b46e43d01c2d0d25ec52d79d71ec75dbeb142e96a88ad503d69ee14b971e3cdaeb8fd85e5292a8c21
2025-04-16 16:26:18 -07:00
glozow
12dc507c4a [doc] archive 29.0 release notes 2025-04-14 21:02:18 -04:00
Ryan Ofsky
9ccee9cd02 doc: Document WITH_EXTERNAL_LIBMULTIPROCESS build option better
This includes a cmake documentation change suggested
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31741#discussion_r2039716492
and another change to mention the option in markdown documentation

Co-authored-by: Cory Fields <cory-nospam-@coryfields.com>
2025-04-14 16:32:37 -04:00
merge-script
817edfb21e
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#32245: doc: Updates how to reproduce fuzz CI failure locally
Some checks failed
CI / test each commit (push) Has been cancelled
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, no depends, sqlite only, gui (push) Has been cancelled
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, fuzz (push) Has been cancelled
CI / Windows native, VS 2022 (push) Has been cancelled
CI / Windows native, fuzz, VS 2022 (push) Has been cancelled
CI / Linux->Windows cross, no tests (push) Has been cancelled
CI / ASan + LSan + UBSan + integer, no depends, USDT (push) Has been cancelled
CI / Windows, test cross-built (push) Has been cancelled
8fe001d597 doc: Updates how to reproduce fuzz CI failure locally (Sergi Delgado Segura)

Pull request description:

  The current version of the doc does not explain how to reproduce a recent fuzzing CI failure (not yet part of the corpora). Add instructions on how to manually create a crash file based on a report.

ACKs for top commit:
  maflcko:
    lgtm ACK 8fe001d597
  glozow:
    ACK 8fe001d597

Tree-SHA512: 7436d71a30bbbffc34770027f1deeacca2de528d8d1b333431d6070c2ba779ecfcdaf25dc791d2154ba4dd37824d06aed2695a8412d7ca1f29e5bd1796d42aeb
2025-04-11 16:34:41 -04:00
merge-script
b2bb27f40c
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#31741: multiprocess: Add libmultiprocess git subtree
Some checks are pending
CI / test each commit (push) Waiting to run
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, no depends, sqlite only, gui (push) Waiting to run
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, fuzz (push) Waiting to run
CI / Windows native, VS 2022 (push) Waiting to run
CI / Windows native, fuzz, VS 2022 (push) Waiting to run
CI / Linux->Windows cross, no tests (push) Waiting to run
CI / Windows, test cross-built (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / ASan + LSan + UBSan + integer, no depends, USDT (push) Waiting to run
babb9f5db6 depends: remove non-native libmultiprocess build (Cory Fields)
5d105fb8c3 depends: Switch libmultiprocess packages to use local git subtree (Ryan Ofsky)
9b35518d2f depends, moveonly: split up int_get_build_id function (Ryan Ofsky)
2d373e2707 lint: Add exclusions for libmultiprocess subtree (Ryan Ofsky)
e88ab394c1 doc: Update documentation to explain libmultiprocess subtree (Ryan Ofsky)
d4bc563982 cmake: Fix clang-tidy "no input files" errors (Ryan Ofsky)
abdf3cb645 cmake: Fix warnings from boost headers (Ryan Ofsky)
8532fcb1c3 cmake: Fix ctest mptest "Unable to find executable" errors (Ryan Ofsky)
d597ab1dee cmake: Support building with libmultiprocess subtree (Ryan Ofsky)
69f0d4adb7 scripted-diff: s/WITH_MULTIPROCESS/ENABLE_IPC/ in cmake (Ryan Ofsky)
a2f28e4be9 Squashed 'src/ipc/libmultiprocess/' content from commit 35944ffd23fa (Ryan Ofsky)
d6244f85c5 depends: Update libmultiprocess library to simplify cmake subtree build (Ryan Ofsky)

Pull request description:

  This adds the [libmultiprocess](https://github.com/chaincodelabs/libmultiprocess) library and code generator as a subtree in `src/ipc/libmultiprocess` and allows it to be built with the cmake `-DENABLE_IPC` option, which is disabled by default.

  This PR does not entirely remove the depends system [libmultiprocess package](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/depends/packages/native_libmultiprocess.mk) because the package is useful when cross compiling. (A cross-compiling cmake build cannot easily build and run a native code generation tool.) However, it does update the depends package to build from the new git subtree, instead of being downloaded separately from github, so the same sources are used to build both the runtime library and the code generator.

  This PR includes the following manual changes (not created automatically with `git subtree add`) which just update the build system and documentation:

  - [`d6244f85c509` depends: Update libmultiprocess library to simplify cmake subtree build](d6244f85c5)
  - [`69f0d4adb72c` scripted-diff: s/WITH_MULTIPROCESS/ENABLE_IPC/ in cmake](69f0d4adb7)
  - [`d597ab1dee6b` cmake: Support building with libmultiprocess subtree](d597ab1dee)
  - [`8532fcb1c30d` cmake: Fix ctest mptest "Unable to find executable" errors](8532fcb1c3)
  - [`abdf3cb6456f` cmake: Fix warnings from boost headers](abdf3cb645)
  - [`d4bc5639829f` cmake: Fix clang-tidy "no input files" errors](d4bc563982)
  - [`e88ab394c163` doc: Update documentation to explain libmultiprocess subtree](e88ab394c1)
  - [`2d373e27071f` lint: Add exclusions for libmultiprocess subtree](2d373e2707)
  - [`9b35518d2f3f` depends, moveonly: split up int_get_build_id function](9b35518d2f)
  - [`5d105fb8c3ff` depends: Switch libmultiprocess packages to use local git subtree](5d105fb8c3)
  - [`babb9f5db641` depends: remove non-native libmultiprocess build](babb9f5db6)

  ---

  Previous minisketch subtree PR #23114 may be useful for comparison

  Instructions for subtree verification can be found:

  - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/developer-notes.md#subtrees
  - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/tree/master/test/lint#git-subtree-checksh

  TL&DR:

  ```sh
  git remote add --fetch libmultiprocess https://github.com/chaincodelabs/libmultiprocess.git
  test/lint/git-subtree-check.sh -r src/ipc/libmultiprocess
  ```

  ---

  This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28722).

ACKs for top commit:
  Sjors:
    re-ACK babb9f5db6
  TheCharlatan:
    tACK babb9f5db6
  vasild:
    ACK babb9f5db6

Tree-SHA512: 43d4eecca5aab63e55c613de935965666eaced327f9fe859a0e9c9b85f7685dc16c5c8d6e03e09ca998628c5d468633f4f743529930b037049abe8e0101e0143
2025-04-11 13:40:31 +01:00
Sergi Delgado Segura
8fe001d597 doc: Updates how to reproduce fuzz CI failure locally
The current version of the doc does not explain how to reproduce a recent fuzzing CI failure
(not yet part of the corpora). Add instructions on how to manually create a crash file based
on a report.
2025-04-10 11:10:41 -04:00
Ryan Ofsky
bb92bb36f2
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#32206: doc: Add fuzz based coverage report generation
Some checks are pending
CI / test each commit (push) Waiting to run
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, no depends, sqlite only, gui (push) Waiting to run
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, fuzz (push) Waiting to run
CI / Windows native, VS 2022 (push) Waiting to run
CI / Windows native, fuzz, VS 2022 (push) Waiting to run
CI / Linux->Windows cross, no tests (push) Waiting to run
CI / Windows, test cross-built (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / ASan + LSan + UBSan + integer, no depends, USDT (push) Waiting to run
7677fde4c7 Add fuzz test coverage report generation (Prabhat Verma)

Pull request description:

  Followup from [comment 1 31933](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31933#pullrequestreview-2685168897) and [comment 2 31933](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31933#pullrequestreview-2683653107) , have added the instructions to generate coverage report for fuzz tests.

ACKs for top commit:
  maflcko:
    lgtm ACK 7677fde4c7
  mabu44:
    Tested ACK 7677fde4c7

Tree-SHA512: b4883ec41e272443fc9fc97dce3fb0f05871ce5ddc07d97f4cf7e1d28506dc892324b42005387a2f5a844b27827785a68d10881067414fe93fd4fbb9645f765d
2025-04-08 17:26:54 -04:00
Prabhat Verma
7677fde4c7 Add fuzz test coverage report generation
Signed-off-by: Prabhat Verma <prabhatverma329@gmail.com>
2025-04-07 15:18:39 +05:30
Hennadii Stepanov
2e751f559a
doc: Amend Qt 6 dependency packages for Ubuntu
On older systems, such as Ubuntu 22.04, `qt6-tools-dev-tools` and
`libgl-dev` are not treated as dependencies of `qt6-tools-dev` and
`qt6-base-dev`, respectively. This change explicitly lists them in the
installation documentation.
2025-04-03 10:11:26 +01:00
merge-script
639279e86a
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30997: build: Switch to Qt 6
Some checks are pending
CI / test each commit (push) Waiting to run
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, no depends, sqlite only, gui (push) Waiting to run
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, fuzz (push) Waiting to run
CI / Windows native, VS 2022 (push) Waiting to run
CI / Windows native, fuzz, VS 2022 (push) Waiting to run
CI / Linux->Windows cross, no tests (push) Waiting to run
CI / Windows, test cross-built (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / ASan + LSan + UBSan + integer, no depends, USDT (push) Waiting to run
f00345727b doc: Update `dependencies.md` for Qt 6 (Hennadii Stepanov)
80b917991e build, msvc: Update `vcpkg.json` for Qt 6 (Hennadii Stepanov)
30dd1f1644 ci: Update for Qt 6 (Hennadii Stepanov)
629d292f4d test: Update sanitizer suppressions for Qt 6 (Hennadii Stepanov)
551e13abf8 guix: Adjust for Qt 6 (Hennadii Stepanov)
c3e9bd086c qt: Fix compiling for Windows (Hennadii Stepanov)
ab399c4db2 depends: Add `native_qt` package (Hennadii Stepanov)
248613eb3e depends: Factor out Qt modules' details (Hennadii Stepanov)
0268f52a4c depends: Introduce customizable `$(package)_patches_path` variables (Hennadii Stepanov)
5e794e6202 depends: Bump `qt` package up to 6.7.3 (Hennadii Stepanov)
6d4214925f cmake: Require Qt 6 to build GUI (Hennadii Stepanov)

Pull request description:

  The currently used Qt 5.15 is approaching [EOL](https://www.qt.io/blog/qt-5.15-extended-support-for-subscription-license-holders) and will reach it before the Bitcoin Core v30 release. The recent migration of the build system to CMake makes it possible to switch to Qt 6.

  This PR updates the OS runtime compatibility requirements for the Bitcoin Core GUI as follows:

  ### 1. Linux

  Starting with Qt 6.5.0, the `libxcb-cursor0` package is required to be installed at runtime.

  ### 2. Windows

  Cross-compiling does not support LTO. We have to re-add it in a follow-up.

  A new style plugin causes minor visual glitches, such as
  ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e06f8685-aa79-49e7-9e61-4d54563f6d04)
  which will be fixed in follow-ups.

  ### 3. macOS

  `bitcoin-qt` now uses the [Metal](https://developer.apple.com/metal/) backend.

  ---

  **IMPORTANT.** Don't forget to install [Ninja](https://ninja-build.org/).

  ---

  For historical context, please refer to:
  - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/20627
  - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24798

  ---

  UPD 2024-10-09. Qt 6.8 has been [released](https://www.qt.io/blog/qt-6.8-released), but it has some [drawbacks](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30997#issuecomment-2402990346) for us. As a result, this PR will stick to Qt 6.7.

  UPD 2025-03-18: [Standard support for Qt 5.15 will end after 26th of May 2025](https://www.qt.io/blog/extended-security-maintenance-for-qt-5.15-begins-may-2025)

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    re-ACK f00345727b
  hodlinator:
    re-ACK f00345727b

Tree-SHA512: 367f722e6c3ea4700b5395871c40b6df8c8062fdc822107090449ea4ae4ad2db75cc53a982a678f4c48ce8f9b2d43ed10e6d23b06165ab78713f161db712d895
2025-04-02 21:41:16 +08:00
Ryan Ofsky
e88ab394c1 doc: Update documentation to explain libmultiprocess subtree
Co-authored-by: Cory Fields <cory-nospam-@coryfields.com>
2025-04-02 08:41:16 -05:00
Ryan Ofsky
69f0d4adb7 scripted-diff: s/WITH_MULTIPROCESS/ENABLE_IPC/ in cmake
Rename WITH_MULTIPROCESS to ENABLE_IPC, because ENABLE_IPC is a more accurate
name for the feature. It controls whether the src/ipc/ directory is built and
whether IPC features like -ipcbind, -ipcconnect, and -ipcfd are available. It
does NOT currently enable multiprocess features which are implemented in #10102
building on top of the IPC features. It will also no longer (as of the next
commit), control whether a find_package call is made so the "WITH_" prefix is
also inappropriate.

-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
git grep -l WITH_MULTIPROCESS | xargs sed -i s/WITH_MULTIPROCESS/ENABLE_IPC/g
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2025-04-02 08:41:16 -05:00
Hennadii Stepanov
f00345727b
doc: Update dependencies.md for Qt 6 2025-04-02 09:15:50 +01:00
Hennadii Stepanov
6d4214925f
cmake: Require Qt 6 to build GUI 2025-04-02 09:11:48 +01:00
merge-script
cfa7f70f6c
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#31933: doc: Add Clang/LLVM based coverage report generation
Some checks are pending
CI / test each commit (push) Waiting to run
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, no depends, sqlite only, gui (push) Waiting to run
CI / Windows native, VS 2022 (push) Waiting to run
CI / Windows native, fuzz, VS 2022 (push) Waiting to run
CI / Linux->Windows cross, no tests (push) Waiting to run
CI / Windows, test cross-built (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, fuzz (push) Waiting to run
CI / ASan + LSan + UBSan + integer, no depends, USDT (push) Waiting to run
b96f1a696a add clang/llvm based coverage report generation (Prabhat Verma)

Pull request description:

  Followed up from the [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31927#issuecomment-2674522975) on the issue [#31927](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31927) , issues have been observed building coverage reports with `gcov` in MacOs and NixOs. This PR adds the steps to generate a coverage report based on the default llvm/clang tooling.

ACKs for top commit:
  Crypt-iQ:
    tACK b96f1a696a
  hodlinator:
    re-ACK b96f1a696a
  janb84:
    Re ACK [b96f1a6](b96f1a696a)

Tree-SHA512: bc54f170e84bb76b3eba7285bd49f051c0b99b784d583a550d8e51511497bcc4df8964bbe3991777648d2f829809db8eabb0cbf0d25f9da5e49e1cfc62f6d8d0
2025-04-02 14:15:09 +08:00
Ryan Ofsky
80e47b1920
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#32096: Move some tests and documentation from testnet3 to testnet4
aa7a898c23 doc: use testnet4 in developer docs (Sjors Provoost)
6c217d22fd test: use testnet4 in argsman test (Sjors Provoost)
7c200ece80 test: use testnet4 in key_io_valid.json (Sjors Provoost)
d424bd5941 test: drop unused testnet3 magic bytes (Sjors Provoost)
8cfc09fafe test: cover testnet4 magic in assumeutxo.py (Sjors Provoost)
4281e3603a zmq: use testnet4 in zmq_sub.py example (Sjors Provoost)

Pull request description:

  In preparation for dropping testnet3 entirely in #31974 this PR migrates a few things to testnet4:

  * the ZMQ examples
  * developer docs
  * various unit tests
  * the snapshot magic byte check in `feature_assumeutxo.py`

  It drops `testnet3` from `MAGIC_BYTES` in the test framework, since no test uses it.

ACKs for top commit:
  fjahr:
    re-ACK aa7a898c23
  maflcko:
    lgtm ACK aa7a898c23 🔊
  hodlinator:
    re-ACK aa7a898c23

Tree-SHA512: 235f74273234e8fb2aedf0017dea5c16bb9813ec7a1f89a51abe85691f09830a5ead834115d7db0936e12e55a40bc81888856a8002fe507c1474407e77f8b9fb
2025-04-01 11:54:41 -04:00
Ryan Ofsky
74d9598bfb
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#32134: descriptors: Multipath/PR 22838 follow-ups
Some checks are pending
CI / test each commit (push) Waiting to run
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, no depends, sqlite only, gui (push) Waiting to run
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, fuzz (push) Waiting to run
CI / Windows native, VS 2022 (push) Waiting to run
CI / Windows native, fuzz, VS 2022 (push) Waiting to run
CI / Linux->Windows cross, no tests (push) Waiting to run
CI / Windows, test cross-built (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / ASan + LSan + UBSan + integer, no depends, USDT (push) Waiting to run
56f271e9b9 descriptors refactor: Clarify multipath data relationships through local struct (Hodlinator)
7e974f474e descriptors refactor: Use range-for and limit scope of seen_multipath (Hodlinator)
99a92efdd9 descriptors doc: Correct Markdown format + wording (Hodlinator)

Pull request description:

  Follows up on unresolved suggestions from #22838. In order of priority:

  1. Fixes a couple of typos [^1][^2] and indentation to conform to Markdown.
  2. Solves `for`-loop nit [^3] and also limits variable scope.
  3. Clarifies data relationships [^4][^5] by introducing `struct` rather than comments.

  [^1]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22838#discussion_r1713711352
  [^2]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22838#discussion_r1735039600
  [^3]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22838#discussion_r1735041704
  [^4]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22838#discussion_r1715150336
  [^5]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22838#discussion_r1715151078

ACKs for top commit:
  Prabhat1308:
    re-ACK [`56f271e`](56f271e9b9)
  mabu44:
    tACK 56f271e9b9
  l0rinc:
    utACK 56f271e9b9
  rkrux:
    crACK 56f271e9b9

Tree-SHA512: 75777c911640038a3e0ea48601c0f55463a5f8ff5b3462d81e8992d9fc8f988d5a240e2166befa67a2a246696b0863f8e2508524c14697c490d3b229fe048996
2025-03-31 16:08:15 -04:00
Jiri Jakes
7a93544cdc
doc: Fix and clarify description of ZMQ message format
This change stresses that all ZMQ messages share the same structure
and that they differ only in the format of the bodies. Previously this
was not clear.

Further it removes the notion of endianness of 32-byte hashes,
as it was misleading, and replaces it with the term 'reversed byte
order' (as opposed to natural or normal byte order produced by hashing
functions).

Additionally, it states that ZMQ 32-byte hashes are in the same format
as in RPC. Previously it incorrectly stated that the two were in
different formats.
2025-03-30 12:05:43 +08:00
merge-script
a54baa8698
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#32100: doc: clarify the documentation of Assume assertion
Some checks are pending
CI / test each commit (push) Waiting to run
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, no depends, sqlite only, gui (push) Waiting to run
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, fuzz (push) Waiting to run
CI / Win64 native, VS 2022 (push) Waiting to run
CI / Win64 native fuzz, VS 2022 (push) Waiting to run
CI / ASan + LSan + UBSan + integer, no depends, USDT (push) Waiting to run
329a0dcdaf doc: clarify the documentation of `Assume` (ismaelsadeeq)

Pull request description:

  An Expression inside `Assume` may be optimized away in production builds when the compiler proves they are side-effect-free.
  This use case is demonstrated in #31363 and is suggested to be documented in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31363#issuecomment-2736410023.

ACKs for top commit:
  l0rinc:
    ACK 329a0dcdaf
  hodlinator:
    re-ACK 329a0dcdaf
  jonatack:
    ACK 329a0dcdaf
  rkrux:
    re-ACK 329a0dcdaf

Tree-SHA512: 4bbb807a1e632694863c1a1fa2e93cc5a756b19f8d78f0642ebe7ffafb01835765fa66c76a680dc6f3c412a5abb0c4a33fb7212c26b4b2d80b6b3b7ee8284b2e
2025-03-27 15:52:21 +08:00
Sjors Provoost
aa7a898c23
doc: use testnet4 in developer docs 2025-03-26 12:29:05 +01:00
Prabhat Verma
b96f1a696a add clang/llvm based coverage report generation
Signed-off-by: Prabhat Verma <prabhatverma329@gmail.com>
2025-03-26 14:07:59 +05:30
Hodlinator
99a92efdd9
descriptors doc: Correct Markdown format + wording 2025-03-25 21:13:35 +01:00
Ryan Ofsky
5f3848c63b
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#31278: wallet, rpc: deprecate settxfee and paytxfee
2f2ab47bf7 Release notes (Pol Espinasa)
bf194c920c wallet, rpc: deprecate settxfee and paytxfee (Pol Espinasa)

Pull request description:

  **Summary**

  This PR deprecates the settxfee RPC and paytxfee setting, marking it for removal in Bitcoin Core 31.0.

  **Motivation**

  The PR was initially motivated by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31088. The intention was to create a new function `settxfeerate` to allow users to set a static fee rate in `sat/vB` instead of `btc/kvB`.

  The `settxfee` RPC allows users to set a static fee rate for all transactions created by the wallet. However, in a dynamic fee environment, this can lead to poor fee choices, either overpaying when the mempool is empty or underpaying when congestion is high. The preferred approach is to rely on fee estimation, which is designed to adapt to network conditions, and is the one by default. Same argument apply for `paytxfee` setting.

  During discussion the consensus was that static fee settings are a footgun and that users should instead specify the fee rate per transaction if they don't want to rely on the fee estimation. Given this, rather than introducing a `settxfeerate` alternative, this PR goes towards removing `settxfee` and `paytxfee` entirely.

  **Key Changes**

  `settxfee` and `paytxfee` is now deprecated and will be removed in Bitcoin Core 31.0.
  Users should rely on fee estimation or explicitly specify a fee rate when constructing transactions.

  **Impact on Users**

  If users currently use settxfee or paytxfee, they should transition to specifying fees per transaction.
  No immediate breakage in 30.0 (must use `-deprecatedrpc=settxfee`), but `settxfee` and `paytxfee` will be removed in 31.0.

  **Alternative Approaches Considered**

  A settxfeerate alternative (using sat/vB) was initially proposed but ultimately rejected in favor of deprecating static fee setting entirely.

  **Notes for removal**
  - When removing paytxfee we should also update txconfirmtarget startup option help text.
  - Get back the comment from `rpc_deprecated.py` test. [+info](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31278#discussion_r1998876768)

ACKs for top commit:
  fjahr:
    re-ACK 2f2ab47bf7
  ismaelsadeeq:
    re-ACK 2f2ab47bf7
  rkrux:
    Concept and utACK 2f2ab47bf7

Tree-SHA512: 0272812cbe5a519737c5d0683acc2072e67559792b4a6472bca8b23426e5ce9e88a3a1eba987feda70a082b8b474b3126893848628d7bf11e1520357b18c8d3e
2025-03-24 13:40:31 -04:00
ismaelsadeeq
329a0dcdaf
doc: clarify the documentation of Assume 2025-03-24 15:28:41 +01:00
merge-script
b43cfa20fd
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30142: doc: add guidance for RPC to developer notes
Some checks are pending
CI / test each commit (push) Waiting to run
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, no depends, sqlite only, gui (push) Waiting to run
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, fuzz (push) Waiting to run
CI / Win64 native, VS 2022 (push) Waiting to run
CI / Win64 native fuzz, VS 2022 (push) Waiting to run
CI / ASan + LSan + UBSan + integer, no depends, USDT (push) Waiting to run
c6eca6f396 doc: add guidance for RPC to developer notes (tdb3)

Pull request description:

  Adds guidance statements to the RPC interface section of the developer notes with examples of when to implement `-deprecatedrpc=`.

  Wanted to increase awareness of preferred RPC implementation approaches for newer contributors.

  This implements some of what's discussed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29912#issuecomment-2081678433

  Opinions may differ, so please don't be shy.  We want to make RPC as solid/safe as possible.

  Examples of discussions where guidelines/context might have added value:
  https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30212#issuecomment-2347371722
  https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29845#discussion_r1571053657
  https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30381#pullrequestreview-2160865613
  https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29954#issuecomment-2103628952
  https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30410#pullrequestreview-2167870869
  https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30713
  https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30381
  https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29060#pullrequestreview-2406688998

ACKs for top commit:
  l0rinc:
    ACK c6eca6f396
  fjahr:
    ACK c6eca6f396
  maflcko:
    lgtm ACK c6eca6f396
  jonatack:
    ACK c6eca6f396

Tree-SHA512: 01a98a8dc0eb91762b225d3278cdb4a5e380ceb7486fd096b4ad9122bed859cea8584d8996d3dce51272fdb792f4a793a1bd1c5445efeb87f0a30f9b6e59a790
2025-03-21 13:47:48 +08:00
merge-script
aa87e0b446
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#31519: refactor: Use std::span over Span
Some checks are pending
CI / test each commit (push) Waiting to run
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, no depends, sqlite only, gui (push) Waiting to run
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, fuzz (push) Waiting to run
CI / Win64 native, VS 2022 (push) Waiting to run
CI / Win64 native fuzz, VS 2022 (push) Waiting to run
CI / ASan + LSan + UBSan + integer, no depends, USDT (push) Waiting to run
ffff4a293a bench: Update span-serialize comment (MarcoFalke)
fa4d6ec97b refactor: Avoid false-positive gcc warning (MarcoFalke)
fa942332b4 scripted-diff: Bump copyright headers after std::span changes (MarcoFalke)
fa0c6b7179 refactor: Remove unused Span alias (MarcoFalke)
fade0b5e5e scripted-diff: Use std::span over Span (MarcoFalke)
fadccc26c0 refactor: Make Span an alias of std::span (MarcoFalke)
fa27e36717 test: Fix broken span_tests (MarcoFalke)
fadf02ef8b refactor: Return std::span from MakeUCharSpan (MarcoFalke)
fa720b94be refactor: Return std::span from MakeByteSpan (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  `Span` has some issues:

  * It does not support fixed-size spans, which are available through `std::span`.
  * It is confusing to have it available and in use at the same time with `std::span`.
  * It does not obey the standard library iterator build hardening flags. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31272 for a discussion. For example, this allows to catch issues like the one fixed in commit fabeca3458.

  Both types are type-safe and can even implicitly convert into each other in most contexts.

  However, exclusively using `std::span` seems less confusing, so do it here with a scripted-diff.

ACKs for top commit:
  l0rinc:
    reACK ffff4a293a
  theuni:
    ACK ffff4a293a.

Tree-SHA512: 9cc2f1f43551e2c07cc09f38b1f27d11e57e9e9bc0c6138c8fddd0cef54b91acd8b14711205ff949be874294a121910d0aceffe0e8914c4cff07f1e0e87ad5b8
2025-03-20 13:41:54 +08:00
tdb3
c6eca6f396
doc: add guidance for RPC to developer notes
Adds deprecatedrpc guidance statement to the
RPC interface guidelines section.
2025-03-19 18:56:17 -04:00
Ryan Ofsky
223fc24c4e
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#31603: descriptor: check whitespace in keys within fragments
Some checks are pending
CI / test each commit (push) Waiting to run
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, no depends, sqlite only, gui (push) Waiting to run
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, fuzz (push) Waiting to run
CI / Win64 native, VS 2022 (push) Waiting to run
CI / Win64 native fuzz, VS 2022 (push) Waiting to run
CI / ASan + LSan + UBSan + integer, no depends, USDT (push) Waiting to run
21e9d39a37 docs: add release notes for 31603 (brunoerg)
a8b548d75d test: `getdescriptorinfo`/`importdescriptors` with whitespace in pubkeys (brunoerg)
c7afca3d62 test: descriptor: check whitespace into keys (brunoerg)
cb722a3cea descriptor: check whitespace in ParsePubkeyInner (brunoerg)
50856695ef test: fix descriptors in `ismine_tests` (brunoerg)

Pull request description:

  Currently, we successfully parse descriptors which contains spaces in the beginning or end of the public/private key within a fragment (e.g. `pk( KEY)`, `pk(KEY )` or `pk( KEY )`). I have noticed that one of the reasons is that the `DecodeBase58` function simply ignore these whitespaces.

  This PR changes the `ParsePubkeyInner ` to reject pubkeys that contain a whitespace at the beginning and/or at the end. We will only check the whitespace in some RPCs (e.g. `importdescriptors`), but an already imported descriptor won't be affected by this check, especially because we store descriptors from `ToString`.

  For context: https://github.com/brunoerg/bitcoinfuzz/issues/72

ACKs for top commit:
  rkrux:
    tACK 21e9d39a37
  darosior:
    re-ACK 21e9d39a37
  sipa:
    utACK 21e9d39a37

Tree-SHA512: 54f48a89a235517e5cdc29a46dceeb7dabbee93c7616a166288ff3f90131808eb0ece43b0797a11fe827a5f7bd51d65e3e75c16789b0a42020934cabb684cc8f
2025-03-18 08:36:41 -04:00
merge-script
d61a847af0
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#32019: cmake: Check for makensis and zip tools before using them for optional deploy targets
1f9b2e150c cmake: Require `zip` only for `deploy` target (Hennadii Stepanov)
0aeff29951 cmake: Check for `makensis` tool before using it (Hennadii Stepanov)

Pull request description:

  For `x86_64-w64-mingw32` and `*-apple-darwin` targets, the optional `deploy` target requires dedicated tools: `makensis` and `zip`, respectively.

  This PR introduces a uniform checks for those tools when attempting to build the `deploy` target, ensuring they are not required for configuring and building any other targets.

  Here is an example of workflow for `x86_64-w64-mingw32`:
  ```
  $ # `nsis` is not installed
  $ cmake -B build -G "GNU Makefiles" --toolchain depends/x86_64-w64-mingw32/toolchain.cmake
  $ cmake --build build -j $(nproc)
  $ cmake --build build -t deploy

  Error: NSIS not found.
  Please install NSIS and/or ensure that its executable is accessible to the find_program() command—
  for example, by setting the MAKENSIS_EXECUTABLE variable or another relevant CMake variable.
  Then re-run cmake to regenerate the build system.

  Built target deploy
  $ sudo apt install nsis
  $ cmake -B build
  $ cmake --build build -t deploy
  ...
  [100%] Generating bitcoin-win64-setup.exe
  [100%] Built target deploy
  ```

  Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/32018.

ACKs for top commit:
  hodlinator:
    re-ACK 1f9b2e150c
  fanquake:
    ACK 1f9b2e150c

Tree-SHA512: 5e2bd28a13bd8fa7c4ba8cf1756d200a4651afe83c463d76ece10027cca343e124eff97012a5368028f761df60f420ab891106b4e33b50045051d57c7464ff98
2025-03-18 17:10:40 +08:00
merge-script
6245c23504
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#32083: doc: shallow clone qa-assets
6f9f415a4f doc: shallow clone qa-assets (Lőrinc)

Pull request description:

  While reviewing https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31457#pullrequestreview-2690077410 I noticed that cloning `qa-assets` takes a lot of time - shallow cloning should suffice here.

  I haven't checked the other clones in this file but suggestion are welcome.

ACKs for top commit:
  maflcko:
    lgtm ACK 6f9f415a4f

Tree-SHA512: 21bd676c7709dbf7fd30b239d0a72f9c230453ed8f8a1b5319ac92ef9c5e67780939f095a239dd31bcb4550f8d69eaed4931a221e19cb0b957f18fac623c4a01
2025-03-18 08:06:17 +08:00
Lőrinc
6f9f415a4f doc: shallow clone qa-assets
While reviewing https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31457#pullrequestreview-2690077410 I noticed that cloning `qa-assets` takes a lot of time - shallow cloning should suffice here.

I haven't checked the other clones in this file.
2025-03-17 13:06:22 +01:00
Pol Espinasa
2f2ab47bf7
Release notes 2025-03-16 11:12:03 +01:00
Hennadii Stepanov
1f9b2e150c
cmake: Require zip only for deploy target 2025-03-13 11:22:30 +00:00
MarcoFalke
fadccc26c0
refactor: Make Span an alias of std::span
This uses a macro, which can be a bit more brittle than an alias
template. However, class template argument deduction for alias templates
is only implemented in clang-19.
2025-03-12 19:44:40 +01:00
Sjors Provoost
36b6f36ac4
build: require sqlite when building the wallet
Require that sqlite is available in order to compile the wallet. Removes
instances of USE_SQLITE since it is no longer possible to not have
sqlite available.

The NO_SQLITE option is dropped from depends.

Co-authored-by: Ava Chow <github@achow101.com>
Co-authored-by: Hennadii Stepanov <32963518+hebasto@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-03-12 15:42:38 +01:00
merge-script
502d47203e
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#31161: cmake: Set top-level target output locations
Some checks are pending
CI / test each commit (push) Waiting to run
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, no depends, sqlite only, gui (push) Waiting to run
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, fuzz (push) Waiting to run
CI / Win64 native, VS 2022 (push) Waiting to run
CI / Win64 native fuzz, VS 2022 (push) Waiting to run
CI / ASan + LSan + UBSan + integer, no depends, USDT (push) Waiting to run
568fcdddae scripted-diff: Adjust documentation per top-level target output location (Hennadii Stepanov)
026bb226e9 cmake: Set top-level target output locations (Hennadii Stepanov)

Pull request description:

  This PR sets the target output locations to the `bin` and `lib` subdirectories within the build tree, creating a directory structure that mirrors that of the installed targets.

  This approach is widely adopted by the large projects, such as [LLVM](e146c1867e/lldb/cmake/modules/LLDBStandalone.cmake (L128-L130)):
  ```cmake
  set(CMAKE_RUNTIME_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/bin)
  set(CMAKE_LIBRARY_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib${LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX})
  set(CMAKE_ARCHIVE_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib${LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX})
  ```

  The `libsecp256k1` project has also recently [adopted](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/1553) this approach.

  With this PR, all binaries are conveniently located. For example, run:
  ```
  $ ./build/bin/fuzz
  ```
  instead of:
  ```
  $ ./build/src/test/fuzz/fuzz
  ```

  On Windows, all required DLLs are now located in the same directory as the executables, allowing to run `bitcoin-chainstate.exe` (which loads `bitcoinkernel.dll`) without the need to copy DLLs or modify the `PATH` variable.

  The idea was briefly discussed among the build team during the recent CoreDev meeting.

  ---

  **Warning**: This PR changes build locations of newly built executables like `bitcoind` and `test_bitcoin` from `src/` to `bin/` without deleting previously built executables. A clean build is recommended to avoid accidentally running old binaries.

ACKs for top commit:
  theStack:
    Light re-ACK 568fcdddae
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK 568fcdddae. Only change since last review was rebasing. I'm ok with this PR in its current form if other developers are happy with it. I just personally think it is inappropriate to \*silently\* break an everyday developer workflow like `git pull; make bitcoind`. I wouldn't have a problem with this PR if it triggered an explicit error, or if the problem was limited to less common workflows like changing cmake options in an existing build.
  TheCharlatan:
    Re-ACK 568fcdddae
  theuni:
    ACK 568fcdddae

Tree-SHA512: 1aa5ecd3cd49bd82f1dcc96c8e171d2d19c58aec8dade4bc329df89311f9e50cbf6cf021d004c58a0e1016c375b0fa348ccd52761bcdd179c2d1e61c105e3b9f
2025-03-12 11:19:00 +08:00
Hennadii Stepanov
45719390a1
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#32011: Docs: fix typos in documentation files
Some checks failed
CI / test each commit (push) Has been cancelled
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, no depends, sqlite only, gui (push) Has been cancelled
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, fuzz (push) Has been cancelled
CI / Win64 native, VS 2022 (push) Has been cancelled
CI / Win64 native fuzz, VS 2022 (push) Has been cancelled
CI / ASan + LSan + UBSan + integer, no depends, USDT (push) Has been cancelled
5601bab4f8 Docs: fix typos in documentation files (wgyt)

Pull request description:

ACKs for top commit:
  jonatack:
    ACK 5601bab4f8
  mabu44:
    crACK 5601bab4f8
  maflcko:
    lgtm ACK 5601bab4f8

Tree-SHA512: 66c14638090f472f6c68d094cd9b0fc2e47e40d29e4f30a0a798992317cce8e96ef053ff159cf950a1d44cffb24554c6cebccec5cf49d24f105b367fc29382c1
2025-03-09 16:44:34 +00:00
Hennadii Stepanov
4637cb1eec
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#32002: doc: add note to Windows build about stripping bins
Some checks are pending
CI / test each commit (push) Waiting to run
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, no depends, sqlite only, gui (push) Waiting to run
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, fuzz (push) Waiting to run
CI / Win64 native, VS 2022 (push) Waiting to run
CI / Win64 native fuzz, VS 2022 (push) Waiting to run
CI / ASan + LSan + UBSan + integer, no depends, USDT (push) Waiting to run
c94195c077 doc: add note to windows build about stripping bin (fanquake)

Pull request description:

  The Windows binaries are particularly big when they contain debug info, closing in on 500mb. Add a note to the Windows build instructions about using `--strip`.

  I haven't tested this (the copying out to WSL). If we don't want to add this note, in favour of [user-presents or similar](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/30593#issuecomment-2271304490), then we should just close #30593.

  Fixes #30593.

ACKs for top commit:
  hodlinator:
    ACK c94195c077
  hebasto:
    ACK c94195c077.

Tree-SHA512: c55670486ef60c6bda720e65443e17747b840e220c5bf6d6c0b77590d95cd6c8f040bc0e67dfa8eb11451f4f2eac9faf25d74ea68251b881773836f4113e8595
2025-03-08 11:43:34 +00:00
Hennadii Stepanov
5f732089d6
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#32017: doc: warn against having qt6 installed on macOS
d79dab0fa9 doc: warn against having qt6 installed on macOS (Sjors Provoost)

Pull request description:

  Document #31009 in time for the v29 release.

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    ACK d79dab0fa9
  hebasto:
    ACK d79dab0fa9.

Tree-SHA512: 4c6e557b6410c7fd766e1cdc356ae9f7410fbb4746732580e5bdf33ba43dca64e6f2fb66677d1e0c8fa71c19f212dc81ac73dc4277f2fd966bbd41c20d9291f8
2025-03-08 11:29:44 +00:00
Hennadii Stepanov
a1aea3ea74
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#31996: doc: link to benchcoin over bitcoinperf
611999e097 doc: link to benchcoin over bitcoinperf (fanquake)

Pull request description:

  Seems like linking to https://github.com/bitcoin-dev-tools/benchcoin is now the best thing to do here. If not, we can just drop the other links.

ACKs for top commit:
  l0rinc:
    ACK 611999e097
  laanwj:
    ACK 611999e097
  hebasto:
    ACK 611999e097. I agree. I've had a great experience using it.

Tree-SHA512: 558060bec92099befaa047e9192e5172e6a0cdfc5530d1f8b4d64ac717ce999a993d39c5d108fa9df3e30b2fc089e31d720f344153381e7c53f0ed40938ae1e0
2025-03-08 10:46:58 +00:00
wgyt
5601bab4f8 Docs: fix typos in documentation files 2025-03-08 09:26:18 +08:00
fanquake
c94195c077
doc: add note to windows build about stripping bin
The Windows binaries are particularly big when they contain debug
info, closing in on 500mb. Add a note to the Windows build instructions
about using `--strip`.
2025-03-07 17:19:05 +00:00
Sjors Provoost
d79dab0fa9
doc: warn against having qt6 installed on macOS 2025-03-07 05:01:46 -05:00
fanquake
c873ab6f23
doc: remove note about macOS self-signing
Followup to #31407.
2025-03-05 17:35:58 +00:00
merge-script
bd0ee07310
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#31407: guix: Notarize MacOS app bundle and codesign all MacOS and Windows binaries
Some checks are pending
CI / ASan + LSan + UBSan + integer, no depends, USDT (push) Waiting to run
CI / test each commit (push) Waiting to run
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, no depends, sqlite only, gui (push) Waiting to run
CI / macOS 14 native, arm64, fuzz (push) Waiting to run
CI / Win64 native, VS 2022 (push) Waiting to run
CI / Win64 native fuzz, VS 2022 (push) Waiting to run
e181bda061 guix: Apply all codesignatures to Windows binaries (Ava Chow)
aafbd23fd9 guix: Apply codesignatures to all MacOS binaries (Ava Chow)
3656b828dc contrib: Sign all Windows binaries too (Ava Chow)
31d325464d contrib: Sign and notarize all MacOS binaries (Ava Chow)
710d5b5149 guix: Update signapple (Ava Chow)
e8b3c44da6 build: Include all Windows binaries for codesigning (Ava Chow)
dd4ec840ee build: Include all MacOS binaries for codesigning (Ava Chow)
4e5c9ceb9d guix: Rename Windows unsigned binaries to unsigned.zip (Ava Chow)
d9d49cd533 guix: Rename MacOS binaries to unsigned.tar.gz (Ava Chow)
c214e5268f guix: Rename unsigned.tar.gz to codesigning.tar.gz (Ava Chow)

Pull request description:

  I have updated signapple to notarize MacOS app bundles without adding any additional dependencies. Further, it can also sign and apply detached signatures to standalone binaries.

  As such, we can use signapple to perform the notarization and stapling steps so that MacOS will run the app bundle after it is installed. `detached-sig-create.sh` is updated to have a notarization step and to download the ticket which will be included in the detached signatures. The workflow is largely unchanged for the MacOS codesigners except for the additional requirement of having an App Store Connect API key and Team UUID, instructions for which can be found at https://github.com/achow101/signapple/blob/master/docs/notarization.md. For guix builders, the workflow is unchanged.

  Additionally, the standalone binaries packaged in the MacOS `.tar.gz` and Windows `.zip` will now be codesigned. `detached-sig-create.sh` was updated to handle these, so the workflow for both MacOS and Windows codesigners remains unchanged. For guix builders, the workflow is also unchanged.

  Because those binaries will how have codesigned and unsigned versions, the build command is modified to output `-unsigned.{tar.gz,zip}` archives containing the binaries. Since this happens to conflict with the tarball used for codesigning, the codesigning tarball was renamed to `-codesigning.tar.gz`. Both MacOS and Windows codesigners will need to adjust their workflows to account for the new name.

  Fixes #15774 and #29749

ACKs for top commit:
  Sjors:
    Tested ACK e181bda061
  davidgumberg:
    Tested ACK e181bda061.
  pinheadmz:
    tested ACK e181bda061

Tree-SHA512: ce0e2bf38e1748cdaa0d13be6f61c3289cd09cfb7d071a68b0b13d2802b3936c9112eda6e4c7b29c535c0995d56b14871442589cdcea2e7707e35c1b278b9263
2025-03-05 17:34:26 +00:00