05e82d86b0 wallet: override minfee checks (fOverrideFeeRate) for fee_rate (Jon Atack)
9a670b4f07 wallet: update sendtoaddress, send RPC examples with fee_rate (Jon Atack)
be481b72e2 wallet: use MIN_RELAY_TX_FEE in bumpfee help (Jon Atack)
449b730579 wallet: provide valid values if invalid estimate mode passed (Jon Atack)
6da3afbaee wallet: update remaining rpcwallet fee rate units to BTC/kvB (Jon Atack)
173b5b5fe0 wallet: update fee rate units, use sat/vB for fee_rate error messages (Jon Atack)
7f9835a05a wallet: remove fee rates from conf_target helps (Jon Atack)
b7994c01e9 wallet: add fee_rate unit warnings to bumpfee (Jon Atack)
410e471fa4 wallet: remove redundant bumpfee fee_rate checks (Jon Atack)
a0d4957473 wallet: introduce fee_rate (sat/vB) param/option (Jon Atack)
e21212f01b wallet: remove unneeded WALLET_BTC_KB_TO_SAT_B constant (Jon Atack)
6112cf20d4 wallet: add CFeeRate ctor doxygen documentation (Jon Atack)
3f72791613 wallet: fix bug in RPC send options (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This PR builds on #11413 and #20220 to address #19543.
- replace overloading the conf_target and estimate_mode params with `fee_rate` in sat/vB in the sendtoaddress, sendmany, send, fundrawtransaction, walletcreatefundedpsbt, and bumpfee RPCs
- allow non-actionable conf_target value of `0` and estimate_mode value of `""` to be passed to use `fee_rate` as a positional argument, in addition to as a named argument
- fix a bug in the experimental send RPC described in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20220#discussion_r513789526 where args were not being passed correctly into the options values
- update the feerate error message units for these RPCs from BTC/kB to sat/vB
- update the test coverage, help docs, doxygen docs, and some of the RPC examples
- other changes to address the excellent review feedback
See this wallet meeting log for more context: http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2020-11-06.html#l-309
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 05e82d8
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 05e82d86b0 did not test and found a few style nits, which can be fixed later 🍯
Xekyo:
tACK 05e82d86b0
Sjors:
utACK 05e82d86b0
Tree-SHA512: a4ee5f184ada53f1840b2923d25873bda88c5a2ae48e67eeea2417a0b35154798cfdb3c147b05dd56bd6608a784e1b91623bb985ee2ab9ef2baaec22206d0a9c
5f9c0b6360 wallet: Remove -upgradewallet from dummywallet (MarcoFalke)
a314271f08 test: Remove unused wallet.dat (MarcoFalke)
bf7635963c tests: Test specific upgradewallet scenarios and that upgrades work (Andrew Chow)
4b418a9dec test: Add test_framework/bdb.py module for inspecting bdb files (Andrew Chow)
092fc43485 tests: Add a sha256sum_file function to util (Andrew Chow)
0bd995aa19 wallet: upgrade the CHDChain version number when upgrading to split hd (Andrew Chow)
8e32e1c41c wallet: remove nWalletMaxVersion (Andrew Chow)
bd7398cc62 wallet: have ScriptPubKeyMan::Upgrade check against the new version (Andrew Chow)
5f720544f3 wallet: Add GetClosestWalletFeature function (Andrew Chow)
842ae3842d wallet: Add utility method for CanSupportFeature (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
This PR cleans up the wallet upgrade mechanism a bit, fixes some probably bugs, and adds more test cases.
The `nWalletMaxVersion` member variable has been removed as it made `CanSupportFeature` unintuitive and was causing a couple of bugs. The reason this was introduced originally was to allow a wallet upgrade to only occur when the new feature is first used. While this makes sense for the old `-upgradewallet` option, for an RPC, this does not quite make sense. It's more intuitive for an upgrade to occur if possible if the `upgradewallet` RPC is used as that's an explicit request to upgrade a particular wallet to a newer version. `nWalletMaxVersion` was only relevant for upgrades to `FEATURE_WALLETCRYPT` and `FEATURE_COMPRPUBKEY` both of which are incredibly old features. So for such wallets, the behavior of `upgradewallet` will be that the feature is enabled immediately without the wallet needing to be encrypted at that time (note that `FEATURE_WALLETCRYPT` indicates support for encryption, not that the wallet is encrypted) or for a new key to be generated.
`CanSupportFeature` would previously indicate whether we could upgrade to `nWalletMaxVersion` not just whether the current wallet version supported a feature. While this property was being used to determine whether we should upgrade to HD and HD chain split, it was also causing a few bugs. Determining whether we should upgrade to HD or HD chain split is resolved by passing into `ScriptPubKeyMan::Upgrade` the version we are upgrading to and checking against that. By removing `nWalletMaxVersion` we also fix a bug where you could upgrade to HD chain split without the pre-split keypool.
`nWalletMaxVersion` was also the version that was being reported by `getwalletinfo` which meant that the version reported was not always consistent across restarts as it depended on whether `upgradewallet` was used. Additionally to make the wallet versions consistent with actually supported versions, instead of just setting the wallet version to whatever is given to `upgradewallet`, we normalize the version number to the closest supported version number. For example, if given 150000, we would store and report 139900.
Another bug where CHDChain was not being upgraded to the version supporting HD chain split is also fixed by this PR.
Lastly several more tests have been added. Some refactoring to the test was made to make these tests easier. These tests check specific upgrading scenarios, such as from non-HD (version 60000) to HD to pre-split keypool. Although not specifically related to `upgradewallet`, `UpgradeKeyMetadata` is now being tested too.
Part of the new tests is checking that the wallet files are identical before and after failed upgrades. To facilitate this, a utility function `sha256sum_file` has been added. Another part of the tests is to examine the wallet file itself to ensure that the records in the wallet.dat file have been correctly modified. So a new `bdb.py` module has been added to deserialize the BDB db of the wallet.dat file. This format isn't explicitly documented anywhere, but the code and comments in BDB's source code in file `dbinc/db_page.h` describe it. This module just dumps all of the fields into a dict.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
approach ACK 5f9c0b6360
laanwj:
Code review ACK 5f9c0b6360
jonatack:
ACK 5f9c0b6360, approach seems fine, code review, only skimmed the test changes but they look well done, rebased on current master, debug built and verified the `wallet_upgradewallet.py` test runs green both before and after running `test/get_previous_releases.py -b v0.19.1 v0.18.1 v0.17.2 v0.16.3 v0.15.2`
Tree-SHA512: 7c4ebf420850d596a586cb6dd7f2ef39c6477847d12d105fcd362abb07f2a8aa4f7afc5bfd36cbc8b8c72fcdd1de8d2d3f16ad8e8ba736b6f4f31f133fe5feba
24d2d3341d QA: wallet_multiwallet: Check that recursive symlink directory and wallet.dat loops are ignored (Luke Dashjr)
69f59af54d Bugfix: Wallet: Soft-fail exceptions within ListWalletDir file checks (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Previously, an exception would be thrown, which could kill the node in some circumstances.
Includes test changes to cause failure.
Review with `?w=1`
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK 24d2d3341d, rebased only since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19502#pullrequestreview-520552944) review.
promag:
Tested ACK 24d2d3341d, test change fails on master.
meshcollider:
utACK 24d2d3341d
Tree-SHA512: f701f81b3aa3d3e15cee52ac9e7c31a73c0d8166e56bf077235294507cbcee099829fedc432a1c4b6d8780885f4e37897b44b980b08125771de3c849c000499e
5e146022da wallet: fix scanning progress calculation for single block range (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
If the blockchain is rescanned for a single block (i.e. start and stop hashes are equal, and with that also the estimated start/stop verification progress values) the progress calculation could lead to a NaN value caused by a division by zero (0.0/0.0), resulting in an invalid JSON result for the `getwalletinfo` RPC. This PR fixes this behaviour by setting the progress to zero in that special case. Fixes#20297.
The behaviour can easily be reproduced by continuously running single block rescans in an endless loop, e.g. via
```bash
#!/bin/bash
while true
do
bitcoin-cli rescanblockchain $(bitcoin-cli getblockcount)
done
```
and at the same time perform some `getwalletinfo` RPCs.
On the master branch, this leads to frequent invalid responses (tested on mainchain):
```
$ bitcoin-cli getwalletinfo
error: couldn't parse reply from server
$ curl --user `cat ~/.bitcoin/.cookie` --data-binary '{"jsonrpc": "1.0", "id": "curltest", "method": "getwalletinfo", "params": []}' -H 'content-type: text/plain;' http://127.0.0.1:8332/
{"result":{"walletname":"","walletversion":169900,"format":"bdb","balance":0.00000000,"unconfirmed_balance":0.00000000,"immature_balance":0.00000000,"txcount":0,"keypoololdest":1603677276,"keypoolsize":1000,"hdseedid":"3196e33ecb47c7130e6ca60f2f895f9259860dca","keypoolsize_hd_internal":1000,"paytxfee":0.00000000,"private_keys_enabled":true,"avoid_reuse":false,"scanning":{"duration":0,"progress":},"descriptors":false},"error":null,"id":"curltest"}
```
(note that missing value for "progress" in the JSON result).
On the PR branch, the behaviour doesn't occur anymore.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 5e146022da
promag:
Core review ACK 5e146022da.
Tree-SHA512: f0e6aad5a6cd08b36c5fe820fff0ef26663229b39169a4dbe757f3c795a41cf5c69c9dc90efe7515675ae1059307f8971123781a0514d10704123a6f28b125ab
Create a fee_rate (sat/vB) RPC param and replace overloading the conf_target and
estimate_mode params in the following 6 RPCs with it:
- sendtoaddress
- sendmany
- send
- fundrawtransaction
- walletcreatefundedpsbt
- bumpfee
In RPC bumpfee, the previously existing fee_rate remains but the unit is changed
from BTC/kvB to sat/vB. This is a breaking change, but it should not be an
overly risky one, as the units change by a factor of 1e5 and any fees specified
in BTC/kvB after this commit will either be too low and raise an error or be 1
sat/vB and can be RBFed.
Update the test coverage for each RPC.
Co-authored-by: Murch <murch@murch.one>
If the blockchain is rescanned for a single block (i.e. start and stop hashes
are equal, and with that also the estimated verification progress) the progress
calculation could lead to a NaN value caused by a division by zero, resulting in
an invalid JSON result for the getwalletinfo RPC. Fixed by setting the progress
to zero in that special case.
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
538be4219a wallet: fix importdescriptor silent fail (Ivan Metlushko)
Pull request description:
Currently `importdescriptor` command will successfully import a descriptor with hardened derivations into a watch-only wallet while silently failing to expand the descriptor to fill the cache. This leads to a broken wallet state and failure to load such wallet due to missing cache on subsequent restart.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 538be4219a
achow101:
ACK 538be4219a
meshcollider:
utACK 538be4219a
Tree-SHA512: 4bdd0ab4437d55b3f1a79c3a300a0b186089155c020fe220a73d0cce274de47d90371d88918d39fd795f9fccf8db328f1e322d29a6062f9ce94a1c254398f004
bd93fc9945 Fix change detection of imported internal descriptors (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Import internal descriptors were having address book entries added which meant they would be detected as non-change. Fix this and add a test for it.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK bd93fc9945
meshcollider:
utACK bd93fc9945
promag:
Code review ACK bd93fc9945.
Tree-SHA512: 8fa9e364be317627ec171eedffdb505976c0e7f1e55bc7e8cfdffa3aeea5db24d231f55166602cd0e97a5ba621acc871de0a765c75d0c65678f83e93c3b657c5
58cfbc38e0 Ignoring (but warn) on duplicate -wallet parameters (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
I expect that there are many users with load on startup wallet definitions in `bitcoin.conf` or via startup CLI argument.
With the new `settings.json` r/w configuration file, users unloading and loading a wallet through the GUI or via the RPC calls might end up with a duplicate `-wallet` entry (one that still remains in bitcoin.conf or CLI) plus the new duplication in `settings.json` due to the unload/load.
Steps to reproduce
* create wallet (if via RPC set `load_on_startup` or unloadwallet/loadwallet then set `load_on_startup`).
* stop bitcoin
* start bitcoind again with same `--wallet=mywallet`
I guess it is acceptable to skip duplicates.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
Tested ACK 58cfbc38e0
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 58cfbc38e0
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 58cfbc38e0. Changes since previous review: rebased, tweaked warning message, squashed/fixed test
Tree-SHA512: f94e5a999bdd7dc291f0bc142911b0a8033929350d6f6a35b58c4a06a3c8f83147be0f0c402d4e946dedbbcc85b7e023b672c731b6d7a8984d4780017c961cfb
nWalletMaxVersion was used to allow an upgrade to a version only
when the new feature was used. This makes sense for the old
-upgradewallet startup option. But because upgradewallet is now a RPC,
putting off the version bump like this does not make sense. Instead,
immediately upgrading to the given version number makes sense.
Instead of using CanSupportFeature and relying on nWalletMaxVersion,
take the new version we are upgrading to and use IsSupportedFeature
with that and the previous wallet version.
0be29000c0 rpc: update conf_target helps for correctness/consistency (Jon Atack)
778b9be406 wallet, rpc: fix send subtract_fee_from_outputs help (Jon Atack)
603c005083 wallet: add rpc send explicit fee rate coverage (Jon Atack)
dd341e602d wallet: add sendtoaddress/sendmany explicit fee rate coverage (Jon Atack)
44e7bfa603 wallet: add walletcreatefundedpsbt explicit fee rate coverage (Jon Atack)
6e1ea4273e test: refactor for walletcreatefundedpsbt fee rate coverage (Jon Atack)
3ac7b0c6f1 wallet: fundrawtx fee rate coverage, fixup ParseConfirmTarget() (Jon Atack)
2d8eba8f84 wallet: combine redundant bumpfee invalid params and args tests (Jon Atack)
1697a40b6f wallet: improve bumpfee error/help, add explicit fee rate coverage (Jon Atack)
fc5721723d wallet: fix SetFeeEstimateMode() error message (Jon Atack)
052427eef1 wallet, bugfix: fix bumpfee with explicit fee rate modes (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Follow-up to #11413 providing a base to build on for #19543:
- bugfix for `bumpfee` raising a JSON error with explicit feerates, fixes issue #20219
- adds explicit feerate test coverage for `bumpfee`, `fundrawtransaction`, `walletcreatefundedpsbt`, `send`, `sendtoaddress`, and `sendmany`
- improves a few related RPC error messages and `ParseConfirmTarget()` / error message
- fixes/improves the explicit fee rate information in the 6 RPC helps, of which 2 were also missing `conf_target` sat/B units
This provides a spec and regression coverage for the potential next step of a universal `sat/vB` feerate argument (see #19543), as well as immediate coverage and minimum fixes for 0.21.
ACKs for top commit:
kallewoof:
Concept/Tested ACK 0be29000c0
meshcollider:
Code review + functional test run ACK 0be29000c0
Tree-SHA512: efd965003e991cba51d4504e2940f06ab3d742e34022e96a673606b44fad85596aa03a8c1809f06df7ebcf21a38e18a891e54392fe3d6fb4d120bbe4ea0cf5e0
