Use SetupAddressRelay to only initialize `m_addr_known` as needed. For outbound
peers, we initialize the filter before sending our self announcement (not
applicable for block-relay-only connections). For inbound peers, we initialize
the filter when we get an addr related message (ADDR, ADDRV2, GETADDR).
These changes intend to mitigate address blackholes. Since an inbound peer has
to send us an addr related message to become eligible as a candidate for addr
relay, this should reduce our likelihood of sending them self-announcements.
Idempotent function that initializes m_addr_known for connections that support
address relay (anything other than block-relay-only). Unused until the next
commit.
e4c8bb62e4 build: Fix undefined reference to __mulodi4 (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
When compiling with clang on 32-bit systems the `__mulodi4` symbol is defined in compiler-rt only.
Fixes#21294.
See more:
- https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16404
- https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28629
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
tested-only ACK e4c8bb62e4
luke-jr:
utACK e4c8bb62e4
fanquake:
ACK e4c8bb62e4 - it's a bit of an awkward workaround to carry, but at-least it's contained to the fuzzers.
Tree-SHA512: 93edb4ed568027702b1b9aba953ad50889b834ef97fde3cb99d1ce70076d9c00aa13f95c86b12d6f59b24fa90108d93742f920e15119901a2848fb337ab859a1
f685a13bef doc: GetTransaction()/getrawtransaction follow-ups to #22383 (John Newbery)
abc57e1f08 refactor: move `GetTransaction(...)` to node/transaction.cpp (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
~This PR is based on #22383, which should be reviewed first~ (merged by now).
In [yesterday's PR review club session to PR 22383](https://bitcoincore.reviews/22383), the idea of moving the function `GetTransaction(...)` from src/validation.cpp to src/node/transaction.cpp came up. With this, the circular dependency "index/txindex -> validation -> index/txindex" is removed (see change in `lint-circular-dependencies.sh`). Thanks to jnewbery for suggesting and to sipa for providing historical background.
Relevant IRC log:
```
17:52 <jnewbery> Was anyone surprised that GetTransaction() is in validation.cpp? It seems to me that node/transaction.cpp would be a more appropriate place for it.
17:53 <raj_> jnewbery, +1
17:53 <stickies-v> agreed!
17:54 <glozow> jnewbery ya
17:54 <jnewbery> seems weird that validation would call into txindex. I wonder if we remove this function, then validation would no longer need to #include txindex
17:54 <sipa> GetTransaction predates node/transaction.cpp, and even the generic index framework itself :)
17:55 <sipa> (before 0.8, validation itself used the txindex)
17:55 <jnewbery> (and GetTransaction() seems like a natural sibling to BroadcastTransaction(), which is already in node/transaction.cpp)
17:55 <jnewbery> sipa: right, this is not meant as a criticism of course. Just wondering if we can organize things a bit more rationally now that we have better separation between things.
17:55 <sipa> jnewbery: sure, just providing background
17:56 <sipa> seems very reasonable to move it elsewhere now
```
The commit should be trivial to review with `--color-moved`.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK f685a13bef
rajarshimaitra:
tACK f685a13bef
mjdietzx:
crACK f685a13bef
LarryRuane:
Code review, test ACK f685a13bef
Tree-SHA512: 0e844a6ecb1be04c638b55bc4478c2949549a4fcae01c984eee078de74d176fb19d508fc09360a62ad130677bfa7daf703b67870800e55942838d7313246248c
779e638ca9 coinstats: Add comments for new coinstatsindex values (Fabian Jahr)
5b3d4e724f Index: Improve logging in coinstatsindex (Fabian Jahr)
d4356d4e48 rpc: Block until synced if coinstatsindex is used in gettxoutsetinfo (Fabian Jahr)
a5f6791139 rpc: Add missing gettxoutsetinfo help docs (Fabian Jahr)
01386bfd88 Index: Return early from failed coinstatsindex init (Fabian Jahr)
1e3842385b index: Use batch writing in coinstatsindex WriteBlock (Fabian Jahr)
fb65dde147 scripted-diff: Fix coinstats data member names (Fabian Jahr)
8ea8c927ac index: Avoid unnecessary type casts in coinstatsindex (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
This is a collection of smaller follow-ups to #19521, addressing several post-merge review comments.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-utACK 779e638ca9
jonatack:
re-ACK 779e638ca9 diff since last review involves doc changes only; rebased to current master and verified clean debug build/no silent conflicts, unit tests, and feature_coinstatsindex functional test
laanwj:
Code review ACK 779e638ca9
Talkless:
re-utACK 779e638ca9 after cosmetic changes.
Tree-SHA512: cb0d038d230c582d7fe3041c89b1e04d39971fab3739d540c609cf826754c6c513b12ded08ac92180aec7a9d7a70114ece50357bd1a902de4adaae9f30b8d699
8858e88c84 p2p: refactor: tidy up `PeerManagerImpl::Misbehaving(...)` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This simple refactoring PR has the goal to improve the readability of the `Misbehaving` method by
- introducing constant variables `score_before` and `score_now` (to avoid repeatedly calculating the former)
- deduplicating calls to LogPrint(), eliminates else-branch
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK 8858e88c84
rajarshimaitra:
tACK 8858e88c84
Tree-SHA512: 1d4dd5ac1d16ee9595edf4fa46e4960915a203641d74e6c33cffaba62ea71328834309a4451256fb45daf759f0cf6f4f199c46815afff6c89c0746e2ad4d4092
fe6dc76b7c wallet test: Add test for subtract fee from recipient behavior (Russell Yanofsky)
2565478c81 wallet test refactor: add CreateSyncedWallet function (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This adds test coverage for wallet subtract from recipient behavior without changing it. Behavior seems to have changed recently in a minor way in #17331 without being noticed.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fe6dc76b7c
glozow:
ACK fe6dc76b7c
promag:
Code review ACK fe6dc76b7c.
Tree-SHA512: e00c5dfe467e4ccef5edb0dd4fff6c53f35a37828a4327bea2e166751e5ef971d519ffca7b8f735b12912bb4a547980626356bc1855981005aed1a6c2a57be0b
- introduce constant variables `score_before` and
`score_after` in order to improve readability
- deduplicate calls to LogPrint(), eliminates else-branch
During initial sync after startup the gettxoutsetinfo RPC will still return an error while catching up. However, after the initial sync the index will not error immediately anymore when it's in the process of syncing to the tip while being called. Instead it will block until synced and then return the response.
fa33ed4b3f fuzz: Limit max ops in tx_pool fuzz targets (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Without a size limit on the input data, the runtime is unbounded. Fix this by picking an upper bound on the maximum number of fuzz operations.
Reproducer from OSS-Fuzz (without bug report):
[clusterfuzz-testcase-tx_pool_standard-5963992253202432.log](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/files/6822465/clusterfuzz-testcase-tx_pool_standard-5963992253202432.log)
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK fa33ed4b3f
Tree-SHA512: 32098d573880afba12d510ac83519dc886a6c65d5207edb810f92c7c61edf5e2fc9c57e7b7a1ae656c02ce14e3595707dd6b93caf7956beb2bc817609e14d23d
faa86b71ac fuzz: Use ConsumeUInt256 helper to simplify rolling_bloom_filter fuzz test (MarcoFalke)
aaaa61fd30 fuzz: Speed up rolling_bloom_filter fuzz test (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Without a size limit on the input data, the runtime is unbounded. Fix this by picking an upper bound on the maximum number of fuzz operations.
Reproducer from OSS-Fuzz (without bug report):
[clusterfuzz-testcase-rolling_bloom_filter-5980807721254912.log](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/files/6822159/clusterfuzz-testcase-rolling_bloom_filter-5980807721254912.log)
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK faa86b71ac
theStack:
Concept and code review ACK faa86b71ac
Tree-SHA512: eace588509dfddb2ba97baf86379fa713fa6eb758184abff676cb95807ff8ff36905eeaddeba05665b8464c35c57e2138f88caec71cbfb255e546bbe76558da0
faafda232e fuzz: Speed up prevector fuzz target (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Without a size limit on the input data, the runtime is unbounded. Fix this by picking an upper bound on the maximum number of fuzz operations.
Should fix https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=35981
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK faafda232e
Tree-SHA512: 1bf166c4a99a8ce88bdc030cd6a32ce1da5251b73873772e0e9c001ec2bacafebb183f7c8c88806d0ab633aada2cff8b78791f5c9c0c6f2cc8ef5f0875c4b2ef
fa8bed6a47 fuzz: Temporarily disable failing assert in banman fuzz test (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Otherwise the remainder of the fuzz test can't be fuzzed without running into crashes
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK fa8bed6a47
Tree-SHA512: ec6606292e2cfd26484c7f6caf1c418c377da54111b332990fce68373f0438defda71d931a42ca34431527fbc172dd2fdf29b260afca15b34910ee137de1c365
c3e111a7da Reduced number of validations in `tx_validationcache_tests` to keep the run time reasonable. (lucash-dev)
Pull request description:
Following a suggestion in the comments, changed `ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags` from testing all possible flag combinations to testing a random subset. Also created a new enum constant for the highest flag, so that this test doesn’t keep testing an incomplete subset in case a new flag is added.
Timing for `checkinputs_test`:
```
Before: 6.8s
After: 3.7s
----------------
Saved: 3.1s (45%)
```
This PR was split from #13050. Also see #10026.
ACKs for top commit:
leonardojobim:
tACK c3e111a7da.
kallewoof:
ACK c3e111a7da
theStack:
re-ACK c3e111a7da
Tree-SHA512: bef49645bdd4f61ec73cc77a9f028b95d9856db9446d2e7fc9a48867a6f0e94c2c9f150cb771a30fe852db0efb0a1bd15d38b00d712651793ccb59ff6157a7b4
78f4c8b98e prefer to use txindex if available for GetTransaction (Jameson Lopp)
Pull request description:
Fixes#22382
Motivation: prevent excessive disk reads if txindex is enabled.
Worth noting that this could be argued to be less of a bug and more of an issue of undefined behavior. If a user calls GetTransaction with the wrong block hash, what should happen?
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 78f4c8b98e
theStack:
Code review ACK 78f4c8b98e
LarryRuane:
tACK 78f4c8b98e
luke-jr:
utACK 78f4c8b98e
jnewbery:
utACK 78f4c8b98e
rajarshimaitra:
Code review ACK 78f4c8b98e
lsilva01:
Code Review ACK and Tested ACK 78f4c8b98e on Ubuntu 20.04
Tree-SHA512: af7db5b98cb2ae4897b28476b2fa243bf7e6f850750d9347062fe8013c5720986d1a3c808f80098e5289bd84b085de03c81a44e584dc28982f721c223651bfe0
a806647d26 [validation] Always include merkle root in coinbase commitment (Dhruv Mehta)
189128c220 [validation] Set witness script flag with p2sh for blocks (Dhruv Mehta)
ac82b99db7 [p2p] remove redundant NODE_WITNESS checks (Dhruv Mehta)
6f8b198b82 [p2p] remove unused segwitheight=-1 option (Dhruv Mehta)
eba5b1cd64 [test] remove or move tests using `-segwitheight=-1` (Dhruv Mehta)
Pull request description:
Builds on #21009 and makes progress on remaining items in #17862
Removing `RewindBlockIndex()` in #21009 allows the following:
- removal of tests using `segwitheight=-1` in `p2p_segwit.py`.
- move `test_upgrade_after_activation()` out of `p2p_segwit.py` reducing runtime
- in turn, that allows us to drop support for `-segwitheight=-1`, which is only supported for that test.
- that allows us to always set `NODE_WITNESS` in our local services. The only reason we don't do that is to support `-segwitheight=-1`.
- that in turn allows us to drop all of the `GetLocalServices() & NODE_WITNESS` checks inside `net_processing.cpp`, since our local services would always include `NODE_WITNESS`
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
Code-Review ACK a806647d26
laanwj:
Code review ACK a806647d26, nice cleanup
jnewbery:
utACK a806647d26
theStack:
ACK a806647d26
Tree-SHA512: 73e1a69d1d7eca1f5c38558ec6672decd0b60b16c2ef6134df6f6af71bb159e6eea160f9bb5ab0eb6723c6632d29509811e29469d0d87abbe9b69a2890fbc73e
aaaa9c6019 fuzz: Extend addrman fuzz test with deserialize (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Requested on IRC:
```
[18:01] <vasild> => I think there is a good chance fuzzing addrman unserialize will find more bugs
[18:04] <sipa> definitely
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK aaaa9c6019 per `git diff fa74025 aaaa9c6`
vasild:
ACK aaaa9c6019
Tree-SHA512: f57d0aecf22a933e48d3181d7398218949588dd0de31218d1d28c825649e55fd60b0de6fbc92d2497cf5639a4adc2061c9bf8216546a2be916feac4f03f16e8f
7b3a20b260 mempool: apply rule of 5 to epochguard.h, fix compiler warnings (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Apply the rule of five to `src/util/epochguard.h::{Epoch, Marker}` for safety, which also nicely fixes the `-Wdeprecated-copy` compiler warnings with Clang 13.
References:
- https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/rule_of_three
- https://www.stroustrup.com/C++11FAQ.html#default
- https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#Rc-five
<details><summary>Compiler warnings fixed</summary><p>
```bash
In file included from policy/rbf.cpp:5:
In file included from ./policy/rbf.h:8:
In file included from ./txmempool.h:24:
./util/epochguard.h:53:17: warning: definition of implicit copy constructor for 'Marker' is deprecated because it has a user-declared copy assignment operator [-Wdeprecated-copy]
Marker& operator=(const Marker&) = delete;
^
./txmempool.h:81:7: note: in implicit copy constructor for 'Epoch::Marker' first required here
class CTxMemPoolEntry
^
policy/rbf.cpp:29:29: note: in implicit copy constructor for 'CTxMemPoolEntry' first required here
CTxMemPoolEntry entry = *pool.mapTx.find(tx.GetHash());
```
```bash
In file included from txmempool.cpp:6:
In file included from ./txmempool.h:24:
./util/epochguard.h:53:17: warning: definition of implicit copy constructor for 'Marker' is deprecated because it has a user-declared copy assignment operator [-Wdeprecated-copy]
Marker& operator=(const Marker&) = delete;
^
./txmempool.h:81:7: note: in implicit copy constructor for 'Epoch::Marker' first required here
class CTxMemPoolEntry
^
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10/../../../../include/c++/10/ext/new_allocator.h:150:23: note: in implicit copy constructor for 'CTxMemPoolEntry' first required here
{ ::new((void *)__p) _Up(std::forward<_Args>(__args)...); }
^
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10/../../../../include/c++/10/bits/alloc_traits.h:512:8: note: in instantiation of function template specialization '__gnu_cxx::new_allocator<boost::multi_index::detail::hashed_index_node<boost::multi_index::detail::hashed_index_node<boost::multi_index::detail::ordered_index_node<boost::multi_index::detail::null_augment_policy, boost::multi_index::detail::ordered_index_node<boost::multi_index::detail::null_augment_policy, boost::multi_index::detail::ordered_index_node<boost::multi_index::detail::null_augment_policy, boost::multi_index::detail::index_node_base<CTxMemPoolEntry, std::allocator<CTxMemPoolEntry>>>>>>>>::construct<CTxMemPoolEntry, const CTxMemPoolEntry &>' requested here
__a.construct(__p, std::forward<_Args>(__args)...);
^
/usr/include/boost/multi_index_container.hpp:655:24: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'std::allocator_traits<std::allocator<boost::multi_index::detail::hashed_index_node<boost::multi_index::detail::hashed_index_node<boost::multi_index::detail::ordered_index_node<boost::multi_index::detail::null_augment_policy, boost::multi_index::detail::ordered_index_node<boost::multi_index::detail::null_augment_policy, boost::multi_index::detail::ordered_index_node<boost::multi_index::detail::null_augment_policy, boost::multi_index::detail::index_node_base<CTxMemPoolEntry, std::allocator<CTxMemPoolEntry>>>>>>>>>::construct<CTxMemPoolEntry, const CTxMemPoolEntry &>' requested here
node_alloc_traits::construct(
^
/usr/include/boost/multi_index/detail/index_base.hpp:108:15: note: in instantiation of member function 'boost::multi_index::multi_index_container<CTxMemPoolEntry, boost::multi_index::indexed_by<boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<mempoolentry_txid, SaltedTxidHasher>, boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<index_by_wtxid>, mempoolentry_wtxid, SaltedTxidHasher>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<descendant_score>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByDescendantScore>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<entry_time>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByEntryTime>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<ancestor_score>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByAncestorFee>>>::construct_value' requested here
final().construct_value(x,v);
^
/usr/include/boost/multi_index/detail/ord_index_impl.hpp:770:33: note: (skipping 5 contexts in backtrace; use -ftemplate-backtrace-limit=0 to see all)
final_node_type* res=super::insert_(v,x,variant);
^
/usr/include/boost/multi_index_container.hpp:693:33: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'boost::multi_index::detail::hashed_index<mempoolentry_txid, SaltedTxidHasher, std::equal_to<uint256>, boost::multi_index::detail::nth_layer<1, CTxMemPoolEntry, boost::multi_index::indexed_by<boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<mempoolentry_txid, SaltedTxidHasher>, boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<index_by_wtxid>, mempoolentry_wtxid, SaltedTxidHasher>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<descendant_score>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByDescendantScore>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<entry_time>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByEntryTime>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<ancestor_score>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByAncestorFee>>, std::allocator<CTxMemPoolEntry>>, boost::mpl::vector0<>, boost::multi_index::detail::hashed_unique_tag>::insert_<boost::multi_index::detail::lvalue_tag>' requested here
final_node_type* res=super::insert_(v,x,variant);
^
/usr/include/boost/multi_index_container.hpp:705:12: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'boost::multi_index::multi_index_container<CTxMemPoolEntry, boost::multi_index::indexed_by<boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<mempoolentry_txid, SaltedTxidHasher>, boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<index_by_wtxid>, mempoolentry_wtxid, SaltedTxidHasher>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<descendant_score>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByDescendantScore>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<entry_time>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByEntryTime>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<ancestor_score>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByAncestorFee>>>::insert_<boost::multi_index::detail::lvalue_tag>' requested here
return insert_(v,detail::lvalue_tag());
^
/usr/include/boost/multi_index/detail/index_base.hpp:213:21: note: in instantiation of member function 'boost::multi_index::multi_index_container<CTxMemPoolEntry, boost::multi_index::indexed_by<boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<mempoolentry_txid, SaltedTxidHasher>, boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<index_by_wtxid>, mempoolentry_wtxid, SaltedTxidHasher>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<descendant_score>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByDescendantScore>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<entry_time>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByEntryTime>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<ancestor_score>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByAncestorFee>>>::insert_' requested here
{return final().insert_(x);}
^
/usr/include/boost/multi_index/hashed_index.hpp:284:46: note: in instantiation of member function 'boost::multi_index::detail::index_base<CTxMemPoolEntry, boost::multi_index::indexed_by<boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<mempoolentry_txid, SaltedTxidHasher>, boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<index_by_wtxid>, mempoolentry_wtxid, SaltedTxidHasher>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<descendant_score>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByDescendantScore>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<entry_time>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByEntryTime>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<ancestor_score>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByAncestorFee>>, std::allocator<CTxMemPoolEntry>>::final_insert_' requested here
std::pair<final_node_type*,bool> p=this->final_insert_(x);
^
txmempool.cpp:363:53: note: in instantiation of member function 'boost::multi_index::detail::hashed_index<mempoolentry_txid, SaltedTxidHasher, std::equal_to<uint256>, boost::multi_index::detail::nth_layer<1, CTxMemPoolEntry, boost::multi_index::indexed_by<boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<mempoolentry_txid, SaltedTxidHasher>, boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<index_by_wtxid>, mempoolentry_wtxid, SaltedTxidHasher>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<descendant_score>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByDescendantScore>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<entry_time>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByEntryTime>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<ancestor_score>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByAncestorFee>>, std::allocator<CTxMemPoolEntry>>, boost::mpl::vector0<>, boost::multi_index::detail::hashed_unique_tag>::insert' requested here
indexed_transaction_set::iterator newit = mapTx.insert(entry).first;
```
```bash
In file included from test/fuzz/policy_estimator.cpp:9:
In file included from ./test/fuzz/util.h:27:
In file included from ./txmempool.h:24:
./util/epochguard.h:53:17: warning: definition of implicit copy constructor for 'Marker' is deprecated because it has a user-declared copy assignment operator [-Wdeprecated-copy]
Marker& operator=(const Marker&) = delete;
^
./txmempool.h:81:7: note: in implicit copy constructor for 'Epoch::Marker' first required here
class CTxMemPoolEntry
^
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10/../../../../include/c++/10/ext/new_allocator.h:150:23: note: in implicit move constructor for 'CTxMemPoolEntry' first required here
{ ::new((void *)__p) _Up(std::forward<_Args>(__args)...); }
^
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10/../../../../include/c++/10/bits/alloc_traits.h:512:8: note: in instantiation of function template specialization '__gnu_cxx::new_allocator<CTxMemPoolEntry>::construct<CTxMemPoolEntry, CTxMemPoolEntry>' requested here
__a.construct(__p, std::forward<_Args>(__args)...);
^
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10/../../../../include/c++/10/bits/vector.tcc:115:21: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'std::allocator_traits<std::allocator<CTxMemPoolEntry>>::construct<CTxMemPoolEntry, CTxMemPoolEntry>' requested here
_Alloc_traits::construct(this->_M_impl, this->_M_impl._M_finish,
^
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10/../../../../include/c++/10/bits/stl_vector.h:1204:9: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'std::vector<CTxMemPoolEntry>::emplace_back<CTxMemPoolEntry>' requested here
{ emplace_back(std::move(__x)); }
^
test/fuzz/policy_estimator.cpp:49:37: note: in instantiation of member function 'std::vector<CTxMemPoolEntry>::push_back' requested here
mempool_entries.push_back(ConsumeTxMemPoolEntry(fuzzed_data_provider, tx));
```
</p></details>
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 7b3a20b260
vasild:
ACK 7b3a20b260
Tree-SHA512: 0406dfcec180152d4f9ed07cbc2f406ad739b41f9c9cb38f8c75159c15d9d8a9a5c7526765966e40d695d265c178f6a80152e7edf82da344a65e55938dddb63d
8169fc4e73 qt, refactor: Fix code styling of moved InitExecutor class (Hennadii Stepanov)
c82165a557 qt, refactor: Move InitExecutor class into its own module (Hennadii Stepanov)
dbcf56b6c6 scripted-diff: Rename BitcoinCore class to InitExecutor (Hennadii Stepanov)
19a1d00831 qt: Add BitcoinCore::m_thread member (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR makes the `BitcoinCore` class reusable, i.e., it can be used by the widget-based GUI or by the [QML-based](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui-qml/tree/main/src/qml) one, and it makes the divergence between these two repos minimal.
The small benefit to the current branch is more structured code.
Actually, this PR is ported from https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui-qml/pull/10.
The example of the re-using of the `BitcoinCore` class is https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui-qml/pull/11.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 8169fc4e73
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 8169fc4e73. Only change is switching from `m_executor` from pointer to optional type (thanks for update!)
Tree-SHA512: a0552c32d26d9acf42921eb12bcdf68f02d52f7183c688c43257b1a58679f64e45f193ee2d316850c7f0f516561e17abe989fe545bfa05e158ad3f4c66d19bca
3e33d170cc Add ipc::Context and ipc::capnp::Context structs (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
These are currently empty structs but they will be used to pass some function and object pointers from bitcoin application code to IPC hooks that run, for example, when a remote object is created or destroyed, or a new process is created.
---
This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10). The commit was first part of larger PR #10102.
ACKs for top commit:
ariard:
Code Review ACK 3e33d170
Tree-SHA512: fd949fae5f1a973d39cb97f2745821ab2f62b98e166e53bc2801f97dcde988e18faaaaa0ffc2a82c170938b3a18078b6162fa35460e6e7c635e681b3c9e5b0a6
007910388b [Refactor] Rename scriptPubKey -> exec_script (sanket1729)
Pull request description:
Rename scriptPubKey to witness_script in ExecuteWitnessScript() function to correctly reflect which script is being executed.
For example in segwitv0, this scriptPubKey refers to the script of the form `OP_0 <script_hash>`, but witness_script refers to the script that actually hashes to the `script_hash`.
If there is a reason why it's named this way, I would love to know
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 007910388b🖖
theStack:
ACK 007910388b
lsilva01:
Code Review 007910388b ACK
Tree-SHA512: 768e10e656b60b1293beb560fb7adbc2c1495e6db1f54f0c2c63109692ae0c579c856b194b33f72afd0d332159a9796c0e2bd99b79ea5c4b1803469a81301fd6
cdd51e8ee1 torcontrol: Resolve Tor control plane address (Adrian-Stefan Mares)
Pull request description:
Closes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22236
This PR forces the Tor control plane address to be resolved before a connection attempt is made, similar to how the `-proxy` / `-onion` address is resolved.
The use case for this change is that the control plane may not have a stable address - in a containerized environment perhaps.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK cdd51e8ee1 tested various configurations on signet with this branch versus master
laanwj:
LGTM ACK cdd51e8ee1
theStack:
ACK cdd51e8ee1🪐
prayank23:
ACK cdd51e8ee1
Tree-SHA512: 5335cfcb89089a2acd6d02b88c2022dec60bb74388a99187c901c1c35d32896814d5f81df55c053953276c51fcec263c6ddadd068316f8e428b841bd599fc21e
2b19f3443e RPC/blockchain: getblockchaininfo: Include versionbits signalling details during LOCKED_IN (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
While the signal has no effect during `LOCKED_IN`, the bit is still defined and recommended for measuring uptake. Makes sense to expose statistics too.
ACKs for top commit:
prayank23:
ACK 2b19f3443e
Sjors:
tACK 2b19f34
theStack:
Tested ACK 2b19f3443e
MarcoFalke:
review-only ACK 2b19f3443e
Tree-SHA512: a9bb5adb21992586119cbb5f87e5348eabcab11d5a3bf769b00b69e466589a669846e503f8384fa8927fd77da0c2d64a54f13a7a55a62980046d70f8255ddf47
20edf4bcf6 rpc: Return block time in getblockchaininfo (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Return tip time in `getblockchaininfo`, for some use cases this can save a call to `getblock`.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK 20edf4bcf6
theStack:
re-ACK 20edf4bcf6
0xB10C:
ACK 20edf4bcf6
kristapsk:
ACK 20edf4bcf6
Zero-1729:
re-ACK 20edf4bcf6
Tree-SHA512: 29a920cfff1ef53e0af601c3f93f8f9171f3be47fc84b0fa293cb865b824976e8c1510b17b27d17daf0b8e658dd77d9dc388373395f0919fc4a23cd5019642d5
