Add unit test calling CreateWalletFromFile, which isn't currently called from
other unit tests, with some basic checks to make sure it rescans and registers
for notifications correctly.
Motivation for this change was to try to write a test that would fail without
the early `handleNotifications` call in ef8c6ca60767cac589d98ca57ee33179608ccda8
from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16426, but succeed with it:
ef8c6ca607/src/wallet/wallet.cpp (L3978-L3986)
However, writing a full test for the race condition that call prevents isn't
possible without the locking changes from #16426. So this PR just adds as much
test coverage as is possible now.
This new test is also useful for https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15719,
since it detects the stale notifications.transactionAddedToMempool notifications
that PR eliminates.
Since the mempool unbroadcast mechanism handles the reattempts for initial
broadcast, the wallet rebroadcast attempts can be much less frequent
(previously ~1/30 min)
When a CWallet doesn't have a ScriptPubKeyMan for the requested type
in GetNewDestination, give a meaningful error. Also handle this in
Qt which did not do anything with errors.
FillPSBT will add our own scripts to the PSBT if those inputs are ours.
If an input also lists pubkeys that we happen to know the private keys
for, we will sign those inputs too.
Internally, a GetSigningProvider function is introduced which allows for
some private keys to be optionally included. This can be called with a
script as the argument (i.e. a scriptPubKey from our wallet when we are
signing) or with a pubkey. In order to know what index to expand the
private keys for that pubkey, we need to also cache all of the pubkeys
involved when we expand the descriptor. So SetCache and TopUp are
updated to do this too.
Implements a bunch of one liners: UpgradeKeyMetadata, IsFirstRun, HavePrivateKeys,
KeypoolCountExternalKeys, GetKeypoolSize, GetTimeFirstKey, CanGetAddresses,
RewriteDB
fa60afc4fb wallet: Add BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain to dumpwallet (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
dumpwallet includes the block hash in the output, so this method depends on the chainstate. According to the developer notes e84a5f0004/doc/developer-notes.md (L1095) it must include a `BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain`.
This is a minor fix and does not need backport, I think.
It fixes test failures such as https://travis-ci.org/github/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/675487097#L2657 , which can only happen in master because the test was not backported.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK fa60afc4fb.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa60afc4fb
meshcollider:
utACK fa60afc4fb
Tree-SHA512: 8df70b06b226b2cdf880dec9264adb72d66fd81b09b404fd1665a79e5f5236d26122eebf15df00fe71ee292b5c91b2dc23a0a42b2aa50a8d690604b23832723f
a1d5b12ec0 Merge getreceivedby tally into GetReceived function (Andrew Toth)
Pull request description:
This PR merges the tally code of `getreceivedbyaddress` and `getreceivedbylabel` into a single function `GetReceived`. This reduces repeated code and makes it similar to `listreceivedbyaddress` and `listreceivedbylabel`, which use the function `ListReceived`. It will also make the change in #14707 simpler and easier to review.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
re-ACK a1d5b12ec0
meshcollider:
utACK a1d5b12ec0
Tree-SHA512: 43d9cd92f7c2c6a8b9c7509aa85a9b9233a6cfec1c43a9062e3bdfb83515413d1feafa8938c828351278ba22bd31c47e62ab5341e4bddc2493103b094d73b047
0d32d66148 Remove -upgradewallet startup option (Andrew Chow)
92263cce5b Add upgradewallet RPC (Andrew Chow)
1e48796c99 Make UpgradeWallet a member function of CWallet (Andrew Chow)
c988f27937 Have UpgradeWallet take the version to upgrade to and an error message out parameter (Andrew Chow)
1833237123 Only run UpgradeWallet if the wallet needs to be upgraded (Andrew Chow)
9c16b1735f Move wallet upgrading to its own function (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
`-upgradewallet` is largely incompatible with many recent wallet features and versions. For example, it was disabled if multiple wallets were used and would not work with encrypted wallets that were being upgraded to HD.
This PR does away with the old method of upgrading upon startup and instead allows users to upgrade their wallets via an `upgradewallet` RPC. This does largely the same thing as the old `-upgradewallet` option but because the wallet is loaded, it can be unlocked to upgrade to HD. Furthermore it is compatible with multiwallet as it works on the individual wallet that is specified by the RPC.
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 0d32d66148
darosior:
ACK 0d32d66148
MarcoFalke:
ACK 0d32d66148🚵
Tree-SHA512: b425bf6f5d605e26506889d63c780895482f07cbc086193218e031e8504d3072d41e90d65cd41bcc98ee4c1eb048954bc5d4ac85435f7394892373aac89a3b0a
92bcd70808 [wallet] allow transaction without change if keypool is empty (Sjors Provoost)
709f8685ac [wallet] CreateTransaction: simplify change address check (Sjors Provoost)
5efc25f963 [wallet] translate "Keypool ran out" message (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Extracted from #16944
First this PR simplifies the check when generating a change address, by dropping `CanGetAddresses` and just letting `reservedest.GetReservedDestination` do this check.
Second, when the keypool is empty, instead of immediately giving up, we create a dummy change address and pass that to coin selection. If we didn't need the change address (e.g. when spending the entire balance), then it's all good. If we did need a change address, we throw the original error.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Code review ACK 92bcd70808
jonasschnelli:
utACK 92bcd70808
achow101:
ACK 92bcd70808
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 92bcd70808
Tree-SHA512: 07b8c8251f57061c58a85ebf0359be63583c23bac7a2c4cefdc14820c0cdebcc90a2bb218e5ede0db11d1e204cda149e056dfd18614642070b3d56efe2735006
fa168d7542 rpc: Document all aliases for first arg of listtransactions (MarcoFalke)
fa5b1f067f rpc: Document all aliases for second arg of getblock (MarcoFalke)
fa86a4bbfc rpc: Rename first arg of generateblock RPC to "output" (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This fixes a bug found with #18531:
* Currently the named argument for `generateblock` is documented as `address/descriptor`, but the server only accepts a named argument of `address`. Fix it by changing the name to `output` for both the documentation and the server code. Also, add tests to prove the server understands the new name `output`.
* Unrelated to that, there have been a bunch of aliases in the server code that are not present in the source code of the documentation. Fix that by adding the alias to the source code of the documentation. Only the first alias is displayed in the rendered documentation. Also, add tests to prove the server actually understands all aliases.
ACKs for top commit:
pierreN:
Tested ACK fa168d7 tests, help messages
Tree-SHA512: 05e15628e3a667b296f3783d20f764b450b959451b5360c7eaf5993156582d47a0f5882330ca2493b851eb46324d504953b90c875bc88a15c9e8c89eb3ef8d92
fa4632c417 test: Move boost/stdlib includes last (MarcoFalke)
fa488f131f scripted-diff: Bump copyright headers (MarcoFalke)
fac5c37300 scripted-diff: Sort test includes (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
When writing tests, often includes need to be added or removed. Currently the list of includes is not sorted, so developers that write tests and have `clang-format` installed will either have an unrelated change (sorting) included in their commit or they will have to manually undo the sort.
This pull preempts both issues by just sorting all includes in one commit.
Please be aware that this is **NOT** a change to policy to enforce clang-format or any other developer guideline or process. Developers are free to use whatever tool they want, see also #18651.
Edit: Also includes a commit to bump the copyright headers, so that the touched files don't need to be touched again for that.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fa4632c417
jonatack:
ACK fa4632c417, light review and sanity checks with gcc build and clang fuzz build
Tree-SHA512: 130a8d073a379ba556b1e64104d37c46b671425c0aef0ed725fd60156a95e8dc83fb6f0b5330b2f8152cf5daaf3983b4aca5e75812598f2626c39fd12b88b180
38677274f9 rpc: settxfee respects -maxtxfee wallet setting (Fabian Jahr)
bda84a08a0 rpc: Add documentation for deactivating settxfee (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
~~Closes 18315~~
`settxfee` can be deactivated by passing 0 as the fee. That does not seem to be documented for the user so this PR adds it in the description. The return value of a simple boolean seems also too simplified given the multiple dimensions that this deactivation feature enables. I.e. it does not seem intuitive if the returned boolean shows that the call succeeded or if means that `settxfee` is active. My suggested solution is to change the return value to a JSON object that included the "active" state and the currently set fee rate.
Examples:
```
$ src/bitcoin-cli settxfee 0.0000000
{
"active": false,
"fee_rate": "0.00000000 BTC/kB"
}
$ src/bitcoin-cli settxfee 0.0001
{
"active": true,
"fee_rate": "0.00010000 BTC/kB"
}
```
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 38677274f9, seems useful to error out early instead of later #16257🕍
jonatack:
ACK 38677274f9
meshcollider:
LGTM, utACK 38677274f9
Tree-SHA512: 642813b5cf6612abb4b6cb63728081a6bd1659d809e0149c8f56060b6da7253fee989b3b202854f3051df3773c966799af30b612648c466b099f00590f356548
a2324e4d3f test: Improve naming and logging of avoid_reuse tests (Fabian Jahr)
1abbdac677 wallet: Prefer full destination groups in coin selection (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
Fixes#17603 (together with #17843)
In the case of destination groups of >10 outputs existing in a wallet with `avoid_reuse` enabled, the grouping algorithm is adding left-over outputs as an "incomplete" group to the list of groups even when a full group has already been added. This leads to the strange behavior that if there are >10 outputs for a destination the transaction spending from that will effectively use `len(outputs) % 10` as inputs for that transaction.
From the original PR and the code comment I understand the correct behavior should be the usage of 10 outputs. I opted for minimal changes in the current code although there maybe optimizations possible for cases with >20 outputs on a destination this sounds like too much of an edge case right now.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Re-ACK a2324e4
achow101:
ACK a2324e4d3f
kallewoof:
ACK a2324e4d3f
meshcollider:
Tested ACK a2324e4d3f (verified the new test fails on master without this change)
Tree-SHA512: 4743779c5d469fcd16df5baf166024b1d3c8eaca151df1e8281b71df62b29541cf7bfee3f8ab48d83e3b34c9256e53fd38a7b146a54c79f9caa44cce3636971a
