No change in behavior.
ATMPArgs can continue to have granular rules like switching BIP125
on/off while we create an interface for the different sets of rules for
single transactions vs multiple-testmempoolaccept vs package validation.
This is a cleaner interface than manually constructing the args, which
makes it easy to mix up ordering, use the wrong default, etc. It also
means we don't need to edit ATMP/single transaction validation code
every time we update ATMPArgs for package validation.
Previously, Add() would return true if the function created a new
AddressInfo object, even if that object could not be successfully
entered into the new table and was deleted. That would happen if the new
table position was already taken and the existing entry could not be
removed.
Instead, return true if the new AddressInfo object is successfully
entered into the new table. This fixes a bug in the "Added %i addresses"
log, which would not always accurately log how many addresses had been
added.
p2p_addrv2_relay.py and p2p_addr_relay.py need to be updated since they
were incorrectly asserting on the buggy log (assuming that addresses are
added to addrman, when there could in fact be new table position
collisions that prevent some of those address records from being added).
The coin selection strategy for MiniWallet is quite straight-forward: simply
pick a single UTXO with the largest value:
self._utxos = sorted(self._utxos, key=lambda k: k['value'])
utxo_to_spend = utxo_to_spend or self._utxos.pop()
If there are several candidates with the same value, however, it is not clear
which one is taken. This can be particularly problematic for coinbase outputs
with fixed block subsidy, since spending could lead to a
'bad-txns-premature-spend-of-coinbase' reject if an UTXO from a too-recent
block is picked. Introduce block height as second criteria (saved in
self._utxos in the methods generate(...) and rescan_utxos(...)), in order to
avoid potential issues with coinbases that are not matured yet.
4718897ce3 test: add script_util helper for creating bare multisig scripts (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR is a follow-up to #22363 and #23118 and introduces a helper `keys_to_multisig_script` for creating bare multisig outputs in the form of
```
OP_K PubKey1 PubKey2 ... PubKeyN OP_N OP_CHECKMULTISIG
```
The function takes a list of pubkeys (both hex- and byte-strings are accepted due to the `script_util.check_key` helper being used internally) and optionally a threshold _k_. If no threshold is passed, a n-of-n multisig output is created, with _n_ being the number of passed pubkeys.
ACKs for top commit:
shaavan:
utACK 4718897ce3
rajarshimaitra:
tACK 4718897ce3
Tree-SHA512: b452d8a75b0d17316b66ac4ed4c6893fe59c7c417719931d4cd3955161f59afca43503cd09b83a35b5a252a122eb3f0fbb9da9f0e7c944cf8da572a02219ed9d
d5f985e51f multiprocess: Add new bitcoin-gui, bitcoin-qt, bitcoin-wallet init implementations (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Add separate `interfaces::Init` subclasses for `bitcoin-wallet`, `bitcoin-gui`, and `bitcoin-qt` binaries instead of sharing `bitcoind` and `bitcoin-node` init subclasses in different binaries. After this, the new init subclasses can be customized in #10102, so node and wallet code is dropped from the `bitcoin-gui` binary and wallet code is dropped from into the `bitcoin-node` binary.
---
This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10).
ACKs for top commit:
lsilva01:
reACK d5f985e
hebasto:
re-ACK d5f985e51f, only suggested changes since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23006#pullrequestreview-787537444) review.
Tree-SHA512: 6784210bd9ce3a6fbc66852680d0e9bc513c072dc538aeb7f48cb6a41580d3f567ccef04f975ee767a714a4b05d4d87273e94a79abda1b9c25d5ac4bbe752006
92617b7a75 effectively changed the
on-disk format in an incompatible way: old deserializers cannot
deal with multiple entries for the same IP.
Introduce a V4_MULTIPORT format, and increment the compatibility base,
so that old versions correctly recognize it as an incompatible future
version.
92617b7a75 Make AddrMan support multiple ports per IP (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
For a long part of Bitcoin's history, this codebase has aggressively avoided making automatic connections to anything but nodes running on port 8333. I'd like to propose changing that, and this is a first PR necessary for that.
The folklore justification (eventually actually added as a comment to the codebase in #20668) is that this is to prevent the Bitcoin P2P network from being leveraged to perform a DoS attack on other services, if their IP/port would get rumoured. It appears, at least the current network scale - and probably significantly larger - that the impact is very low at best (see calculations by vasild in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/5150#issuecomment-853888909 e.g.). Another possible justification would be a risk that treating different IP:port combinations separately would help perform Eclipse attacks (by an attacker rumouring their own IP with many ports). This concern is (a) no different than what is possible with IPv6 (where large ranges of IP addresses are very cheaply available), and (b) already hopefully sufficiently addressed by addrman's design (which limits access through based selected based on network groups).
And this policy has downsides too; in particular, a fixed port is easy to detect, and a very obvious sign a Bitcoin node is running there.
One obstacle in moving away from a default port that is the fact that addrman is currently restricted to a single entry per IP address. If ports are no longer expected to be generally always the default one, we need to deal with the case where conflicting information is relayed. It turns out there is a very natural solution to this: treat (IP,port) combination exactly as we're treating IPs now; this automatically means that the same IP may appear with multiple ports, simply because those would be distinct entries. Given that indexing into addrman's bucket _already_ uses the port number, the only change required is making all addrman lookup be (IP,port) (aka `CService`) based, rather than IP (aka `CNetAddr`) based.
This PR doesn't include any change to the actual outbound connection preference logic, as perhaps that's something that we want to phase in more gradually.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 92617b7a75
naumenkogs:
ACK 92617b7a75
ajtowns:
ACK 92617b7a75
vasild:
ACK 92617b7a75
Tree-SHA512: 9eef06ce97a8b54a3f05fb8acf6941f253a9a5e0be8ce383dd05c44bb567cea243b74ee5667178e7497f6df2db93adab97ac66edbc37c883fd8ec840ee69a33f
This commit does not change behavior in any way. See previous commit for
complete rationale, but these flags are being disabled because they
aren't implemented and will otherwise break backwards compatibility when
they are implemented.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i 's:\(ALLOW_.*\) \(//!< unimplemented\):// \1\2:' src/util/system.h
sed -i '/DISALLOW_NEGATION.*scripted-diff/d' src/util/system.cpp
git grep -l 'ArgsManager::ALLOW_\(INT\|STRING\)' | xargs sed -i 's/ArgsManager::ALLOW_\(INT\|STRING\)/ArgsManager::ALLOW_ANY | ArgsManager::DISALLOW_NEGATION/g'
git grep -l 'ALLOW_BOOL' -- ':!src/util/system.h' | xargs sed -i 's/ALLOW_BOOL/ALLOW_ANY/g'
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
Currently, ALLOW_{INT|BOOL|STRING} flags don't do any real validation,
so current uses of these flags are misleading and will also break
backwards compatibility whenever these flags are implemented in a future
PR (draft PR is #16545).
An additional complication is that while these flags don't do any real
settings validation, they do affect whether setting negation syntax is
allowed.
Fix this mess by disabling ALLOW_{INT|BOOL|STRING} flags until they are
implemented, and adding an unambiguous DISALLOW_NEGATION flag. This is
done in two commits, with this commit adding the DISALLOW_NEGATION flag,
and the next commit disabling the ALLOW_{INT|BOOL|STRING} flags.
e9ade032f3 tests: Add feature_segwit.py --descriptors to test_runner.py (Andrew Chow)
ae6cbcc909 tests: restrict feature_segwit legacy wallet import tests (Andrew Chow)
1d13c44a4c tests: Use descriptors for feature_segwit multisig setup (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
`feature_segwit.py` has tests for some legacy wallet behavior, but otherwise does not really need the legacy wallet. Those parts now require `--legacy-wallet` to be provided (as with other legacy wallet tests). Other parts of the test are changed to work with descriptor wallets as well.
ACKs for top commit:
lsilva01:
tACK e9ade03
Tree-SHA512: 4ae76a4d2a8d318e7f8ad4c984748e3cdd67ed00359fcd798a08492ed9399b1d01be88c9ebea3d6c996fbe190cf41708a15c98f088f0cb5c47d6d00fff258944
082c5bf099 [refactor] pass coinsview and height to check() (glozow)
ed6115f1ea [mempool] simplify some check() logic (glozow)
9e8d7ad5d9 [validation/mempool] use Spend/AddCoin instead of UpdateCoins (glozow)
09d18916af MOVEONLY: remove single-use helper func CheckInputsAndUpdateCoins (glozow)
e8639ec26a [mempool] remove now-unnecessary code (glozow)
54c6f3c1da [mempool] speed up check() by using coins cache and iterating in topo order (glozow)
30e240f65e [bench] Benchmark CTxMemPool::check() (glozow)
cb1407196f [refactor/bench] make mempool_stress bench reusable and parameterizable (glozow)
Pull request description:
Remove the txmempool <-> validation circular dependency by removing txmempool's dependency on validation. There are two functions in txmempool that need validation right now: `check()` and `removeForReorg()`. This PR removes the dependencies in `check()`.
This PR also improves the performance of `CTxMemPool::check()` by walking through the entries exactly once, in ascending ancestorcount order, which guarantees that we see parents before children.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
reACK 082c5bf099
GeneFerneau:
tACK [082c5bf](082c5bf099)
rajarshimaitra:
tACK 082c5bf099
theStack:
Code-review ACK 082c5bf099
Tree-SHA512: 40ac622af1627b5c3e6abb4f0f035d833265a8c5e8dc88faf5354875dfb5137f137825e54bbd2a2668ed37b145c5d02285f776402629f58596e51853a9a79d29
45827fd718 test: check for block reject reasons in p2p_segwit.py [2/2] (Sebastian Falbesoner)
4eb532ff8b test: check for block reject reasons in p2p_segwit.py [1/2] (Sebastian Falbesoner)
b1488c4dce test: fix reference to block processing test in p2p_segwit.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
In the test `p2p_segwit.py`, there are many instances where we send a segwit block to a node with the expectation that it is rejected. For this purpose, the helper function `test_witness_block` exists which allows also to check for a specific reject `reason` that is asserted in the debug log:
502d22ceed/test/functional/p2p_segwit.py (L119-L120)
This PR aims to increase the precision of the tests by adding the expected reject reasons to all `test_witness_block` call instances (found via `grep`ing after `test_witness_block(.*accepted=False`). For some blocks that are rejected due to failed script verification, the exact reason is only shown in the debug log if parallel script verification is disabled. For this reason, the addition of the reasons is split up in two commits:
* first, all instances are tackled that are not subject to script verification, i.e. it doesn't matter whether parallel script verification is enabled or not (e.g. `bad-blk-weight`, `bad-witness-merkle-match`...)
* then, we explicitely set `-par=1` to only use one script thread, and add the remaining reasons (`non-mandatory-script-verify-flag` with the more specific reason in parantheses)
ACKs for top commit:
stratospher:
tested ACK 45827fd.
Tree-SHA512: 00f31867f11d48b38a42b1e79a1303bda1c797ccf3d8c73e6107d70b062604d51ee2a3f2251e7f068dfafdaf09469d27dfee438d9bc9ebaef7febc4b6ef90a95
a52f1d1340 walletdb: Use SQLiteDatabase for mock wallet databases (Andrew Chow)
a78c229808 tests: Place into mapWallet in coinselector_tests (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
#23288 changed coinselector_tests to use `DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan`, but it also ended up significantly slowing down the test, from 4 seconds to over 1 minute. It appears that the source of this slow down is with `CWallet::AddToWallet`, and primarily due to writing data to the mock wallet database. Because the only thing that is actually needed is for the created transaction to be placed into `CWallet::mapWallet`, this PR removes the call to `AddToWallet` and just places the transaction into `mapWallet` directly. This reduces the test time to 5 seconds.
To speed things up further, `CreateMockWalletDatabase` is changed to make a `SQLiteDatabase` instead of a `BerkeleyDatabase`. This is safe because there are no tests that require a specific mock database type.
ACKs for top commit:
brunoerg:
tACK a52f1d1340
lsilva01:
tACK a52f1d1. Performed 74.36% better on Ubuntu 20.04 (VM, 12 MB, 8vCPU).
glozow:
utACK a52f1d1340
Tree-SHA512: da77936bfd2e816d2e71703567b9389d0ee79f3a4a690802ffe3469df5bed371b296cb822b897f625654dab9436d91fd6bc02364a518a47d746e487d70a72595
While const shared_ptr<X> gives us an immutable shared pointer to a mutable X (we can't set it to some other X later), shared_ptr<const X> gives us a shared pointer to an immutable X. Importantly, we can recast shared_ptr<X> into shared_ptr<const X>, but not the other way around. We do this for two reasons: because it makes the code safer to guarantee the wallet is not modified, and because it further dispells the misconception that const shared_ptr<X> gives immutability to X.
Introduce convention to use const shared pointers everywhere, unless the shared pointer is modified at some point, which it very rarely is.
We want this convention, as it helps alleviate the misconception that a const shared pointer somehow results in a pointer to an immutable object, which is false.
f778845d97 ci: Add vcpkg tools cache (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
On master (02feae54a5) vcpkg downloads some tools that are used internally:
```
...
A suitable version of cmake was not found (required v3.20.0). Downloading portable cmake v3.20.0...
Downloading cmake...
https://github.com/Kitware/CMake/releases/download/v3.20.2/cmake-3.20.2-windows-i386.zip -> C:\Users\ContainerAdministrator\AppData\Local\Temp\vcpkg\downloads\cmake-3.20.2-windows-i386.zip
Extracting cmake...
A suitable version of 7zip was not found (required v18.1.0). Downloading portable 7zip v18.1.0...
Downloading 7zip...
https://www.nuget.org/api/v2/package/7-Zip.CommandLine/18.1.0 -> C:\Users\ContainerAdministrator\AppData\Local\Temp\vcpkg\downloads\7-zip.commandline.18.1.0.nupkg
Extracting 7zip...
A suitable version of nuget was not found (required v5.5.0). Downloading portable nuget v5.5.0...
Downloading nuget...
https://dist.nuget.org/win-x86-commandline/v5.5.1/nuget.exe -> C:\Users\ContainerAdministrator\AppData\Local\Temp\vcpkg\downloads\22ea847d-nuget.exe
Detecting compiler hash for triplet x64-windows-static...
A suitable version of powershell-core was not found (required v7.1.0). Downloading portable powershell-core v7.1.0...
Downloading powershell-core...
https://github.com/PowerShell/PowerShell/releases/download/v7.1.3/PowerShell-7.1.3-win-x86.zip -> C:\Users\ContainerAdministrator\AppData\Local\Temp\vcpkg\downloads\PowerShell-7.1.3-win-x86.zip
Extracting powershell-core...
...
```
If any of downloads above fails the whole CI task fails (see #23107). The most recent failure examples in the master branch:
- c001da306b, [log](https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/task/5182966176415744/logs/build.log)
- 12ff8993bc, [log](https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/task/5367684129882112/logs/build.log)
This PR adds vcpkg tools cache.
Closes#23107.
---
Note for reviewers. Some patches from the initial PR were split into separated PRs: #23310 and #23329. Therefore, a discussion here could be outdated or irrelevant until the recent [push](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23215#issuecomment-949556531).
ACKs for top commit:
sipsorcery:
ACK f778845d97.
Tree-SHA512: 201f4e4d38c00cbec6aaeca4f3e1b60f1c65289fb68b82cead47f37f6af5ac42dd539cf8ed3566f5bd9afe4a7762d42bbabb316d58f47352d4e7bfc2214806fe
Default to SQLiteDatabase instead of BerkeleyDatabase for
CreateDummyWalletDatabase. Most tests already use descriptor wallets and
the mock db doesn't really matter for tests. The tests where it does
matter will make the db directly.
Instead of using AddToWallet so that making a COutput will work,
directly add the transaction into wallet.mapWallet. This bypasses many
checks that AddToWallet will do which are pointless and just slow down
this test.
58765a450c qt: Use only Qt translation primitives in GUI code (W. J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Use `Object::tr`, `QT_TRANSLATE_NOOP`, and `QCoreApplication::translate` as appropriate instead of using `_()` which doesn't get picked up.
Replaces bitcoin/bitcoin#22764
Edit: I checked that the strings end up in the appropriate context in `bitcoin_en.ts` after `make translate`:
- "Settings file could not be read" "Settings file could not be written" end up in `bitcoin-core`
- "(press q to shutdown and continue later)" and "press q to shutdown" end up in `SplashScreen`
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 58765a450c
Tree-SHA512: d0cc5901426c47d411d0fe75aac195b9684b51385f74c161da772dbf9f0977f7ad7a0976e17366f49b40718e9b6eb87c3e93306dc845f97adddbc47d00731742
fa4ec1c0bd Make GenTxid boolean constructor private (MarcoFalke)
faeb9a5753 remove unused CTxMemPool::info(const uint256& txid) (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This boolean argument is either verbose (when used with a named arg) or unintuitive and dangerous (when used as a plain bool).
Fix that by making the constructor private.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fa4ec1c0bd
jnewbery:
Code review ACK fa4ec1c0bd
glozow:
code review ACK fa4ec1c0bd
Tree-SHA512: bf08ee09168885cfda71e5a01ec412b93964662a90dd9d91e75f7fdf2eaff7c21a95204d0e90b00438bfeab564d0aea66bdb9c0394ee7a05743e65a817159446
66f6efc70a rpc: improve TransactionDescriptionString() "generated" help (Jon Atack)
296cfa312f test: add listtransactions/listsinceblock "trusted" coverage (Jon Atack)
d95913fc43 rpc: fix "trusted" description in TransactionDescriptionString (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
The RPC gettransaction, listtransactions, and listsinceblock helps returned by `TransactionDescriptionString()` inform the user that the `trusted` boolean field is only present if the transaction is trusted and safe to spend from.
The field is in fact returned by `WalletTxToJSON()` when the transaction has 0 confirmations (or negative confirmations, if conflicted), and it can be true or false.
This patch fixes the help, adds test coverage, and touches up the help for the neighboring `generate` field.
ACKs for top commit:
rajarshimaitra:
tACK 66f6efc70a
theStack:
Tested ACK 66f6efc70a
Tree-SHA512: 4c2127765b82780e07bbdbf519d27163d414d9f15598e01e02210f210e6009be344c84951d7274e747b1386991d4c3b082cd25aebe885fb8cf0b92d57178f68e
d047ed729f external_signer: improve fingerprint matching logic (stop on first match) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
The fingerprint matching logic in `ExternalSigner::SignTransaction` currently always iterates all inputs of a PSBT, even after a match has already been found. I guess the reason for that is not that it was not thought of, but rather the fact that breaking out of a nested loop is simply not possible (at least not without adding ugly constructs like gotos or extra state variables).
This PR fixes this by using `std::any_of` from C++'s standard library, see http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/algorithm/any_of/
ACKs for top commit:
lsilva01:
Code Review ACK d047ed729f
Sjors:
utACK d047ed7
Zero-1729:
crACK d047ed729f
mjdietzx:
Code review ACK d047ed729f
hebasto:
ACK d047ed729f, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: 447e7c0c6a5b5549a2c09d52e55ba4146302c1a06e4d96de11f6945d09f98c89129cba221202dff7e0718e01a83dd173b9f19b1f02b6be228978f3f6e35d8096
ea4b61a157 refactor: remove references to deprecated values under std::allocator (Pasta)
Pull request description:
Removes usages of allocator::pointer, allocator::const_pointer, allocator::reference and allocator::const_reference which are deprecated in c++17 and **removed** in c++20. See https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/memory/allocator
Also prefers `using` over `typedef` see: https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#Rt-using I'll be happy to revert this if requested so
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Re-ACK ea4b61a157
Tree-SHA512: 9353e47a7de27bcd91b341eb2d832318b51fce9f508fcc791f05c02c5a160f430f4e7214e76f4b3e29639750d311c679789d8b7409255b13637391e4575c9ebe
2d2edc1248 tests: Use Descriptor wallets for generic wallet tests (Andrew Chow)
99516285b7 tests: Use legacy change type in subtract fee from outputs test (Andrew Chow)
dcd6eeb64a tests: Use descriptors in psbt_wallet_tests (Andrew Chow)
4b1588c6bd tests: Use DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan in coinselector_tests (Andrew Chow)
811319fea4 tests, gui: Use DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan in GUI tests (Andrew Chow)
9bf0243872 bench: Use DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan for wallet things (Andrew Chow)
5e54aa9b90 bench: remove global testWallet from CoinSelection benchmark (Andrew Chow)
a5595b1320 tests: Remove global vCoins and testWallet from coinselector_tests (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Currently, various tests use `LegacyScriptPubKeyMan` because it was convenient for the refactor that introduced the `ScriptPubKeyMan` interface. However, with the legacy wallet slated to be removed, these tests should not continue to use `LegacyScriptPubKeyMan` as they are not testing any specific legacy wallet behavior. These tests are changed to use `DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan`s.
Some of the coin selection tests and benchmarks had a global `testWallet`, but this seemed to cause some issues with ensuring that descriptors were set up in that wallet for each test. Those have been restructured to not have any global variables that may be modified between tests.
The tests which test specific legacy wallet behavior remain unchanged.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 2d2edc1248
brunoerg:
tACK 2d2edc1248
Tree-SHA512: 6d60e5978e822d48e46cfc0dae4635fcb1939f21ea9d84eb72e36112e925554b7ee8f932c7ed0c4881b6566c6c19260bec346abdff1956ca9f300b30fb4e2dd1
6911ab95f1 wallet: fix segfault by avoiding invalid default-ctored `external_spk_managers` entry (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Fixes#23321 (bug reported by Josef Vondrlik (josef-v)).
In the method `CWallet::LoadActiveScriptPubKeyMan`, the map `external_spk_managers` (or `internal_spk_managers`, if parameter `internal` is false) is accessed via std::map::operator[], which means that a default-ctored entry is created with a null-pointer as value, if the key doesn't exist. As soon as this value is dereferenced, a segmentation fault occurs, e.g. in `CWallet::KeypoolCountExternalKeys`.
The bevaviour can be reproduced by the following steps (starting with empty regtest datadir):
```
$ ./src/bitcoind -regtest -daemon
$ ./src/bitcoin-cli -regtest -named createwallet_name=wallet descriptors=true blank=true
$ cat regtest-descriptors.txt
[
{
"desc": "tr([e4445899/49'/1'/0']tprv8ZgxMBicQKsPd8jCeBWsYLEoWxbVgzJDatJ7XkwQ6G3uF4FsHuaziHQ5JZAW4K515nj6kVVwPaNWZSMEcR7aFCwL4tQqTcaoprMKTTtm6Zg/1/*)#mr3llm7f",
"timestamp": 1634652324,
"active": true,
"internal": true,
"range": [
0,
999
],
"next": 0
}
]
$ ./src/bitcoin-cli -regtest importdescriptors "$(cat regtest-descriptors.txt)"
[
{
"success": true
}
]
$ ./src/bitcoin-cli -regtest getwalletinfo
error: timeout on transient error: Could not connect to the server 127.0.0.1:18443 (error code 1 - "EOF reached")
```
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
Code Review ACK 6911ab95f1
lsilva01:
Tested ACK 6911ab9 on Ubuntu 20.04.
instagibbs:
ACK 6911ab95f1
Tree-SHA512: 76aa96847cf2739413fb68fb902afef0b3ab9381178dd62fb0abac69f853f1f6523d73c60e610375b9a7730f275eda9162503b89f5be6e6e349a8d047b59c8dc
632aad9e6d Make CAddrman::Select_ select buckets, not positions, first (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
The original CAddrMan behaviour (before #5941) was to pick a uniformly random non-empty bucket, and then pick a random element from that bucket. That commit, which introduced deterministic placement of entries in buckets, changed this to picking a uniformly random non-empty bucket position instead.
I believe that was a mistake. Buckets are our best metric for spreading out requests across independently-controlled nodes. That
does mean that if a bucket has fewer entries, its entries are supposed to be picked more frequently.
This PR reverts to the original high-level behavior, but on top of the deterministic placement logic.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK 632aad9e6d
naumenkogs:
ACK 632aad9e6d
mzumsande:
ACK 632aad9e6d
Tree-SHA512: 60768afba2b6f0abd0dddff04381cab5acf374df48fc0e883ee16dde7cf7fd33056a04b573cff24a1b4d8e2a645bf0f0b3689eec84da4ff330e7b59ef142eca1
9c1052a521 wallet: Default new wallets to descriptor wallets (Andrew Chow)
f19ad40463 rpc, wallet: Descriptor wallets are no longer experimental (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Changes the default wallet type from legacy to descriptors. Descriptor wallets will now by the default type. Additionally, descriptor wallets will no longer be marked as experimental.
This follows the timeline proposed in #20160
ACKs for top commit:
lsilva01:
Tested ACK 9c1052a521 on Ubuntu 20.04
prayank23:
tACK 9c1052a521
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 9c1052a521
Tree-SHA512: 834e6fec88e0c18673af7ebe135bd5333694d1be502164eb93a90e3e76c27974165aa4e59426945100c88e4eca07356e16886ef5b05cf789683ecb23fc71a12a
fa2662c293 net: Avoid logging AlreadyHaveTx when disconnecting misbehaving peer (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
There is no need to log `AlreadyHaveTx` for an inv when a peer is marked for disconnection due to sending that inv. In fact, I find it confusing that a `block-relay-only` connection calls `AlreadyHaveTx` at all. Also there is no need to call `AddKnownTx` when the peer is marked for disconnection.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK fa2662c293
jnewbery:
Code review ACK fa2662c293
dunxen:
Concept and code review ACK fa2662c293
Tree-SHA512: 9996b807a824021f992b5281d82ff0cbbe6a442c2fedf7dfd6adda64ccc5e0ef4fb0ff91ab75086f975837bbbb7a5934ac7e671a80dcababa7203c92fc0c7f84
4307849256 [mempool] delete exists(uint256) function (glozow)
d50fbd4c5b create explicit GenTxid::{Txid, Wtxid} ctors (glozow)
Pull request description:
We use the same type for txids and wtxids, `uint256`. In places where we want the ability to pass either one, we distinguish them using `GenTxid`.
The (overloaded) `CTxMemPool::exists()` function is defined as follows:
```c
bool exists(const uint256& txid) const { return exists(GenTxid{false, txid}); }
```
It always assumes that a uint256 is a txid, which is a footgunny interface.
Querying by wtxid returns a false negative if the transaction has a witness. 🐛
Another approach would be to try both:
```c
bool exists(const uint256& txid) const { return exists(GenTxid{false, txid}) || exists(GenTxid{false, txid}); }
```
But that's slower and wrongfully placing the burden on the callee; the caller always knows whether the hash is a txid or a wtxid.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 4307849256
jnewbery:
Tested and code review ACK 4307849256
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 4307849256👘
Tree-SHA512: 8ed167a96f3124b6c14e41073c8358658114ce121a15a4cca2db7a5ac565903a6236e34e88ac03382b8bb8b68e3999abbfc5718bc8c22476554d6b49a5298eec
077a875d94 refactor: include a missing <limits> header in fs.cpp (Joan Karadimov)
Pull request description:
I get this compilation error on versions `0.21.1` and `22.0`:
```
fs.cpp: In member function 'bool fsbridge::FileLock::TryLock()':
fs.cpp:123:89: error: 'numeric_limits' is not a member of 'std'
123 | if (!LockFileEx(hFile, LOCKFILE_EXCLUSIVE_LOCK | LOCKFILE_FAIL_IMMEDIATELY, 0, std::numeric_limits<DWORD>::max(), std::numeric_limits<DWORD>::max(), &overlapped)) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs.cpp:123:109: error: expected primary-expression before '>' token
123 | if (!LockFileEx(hFile, LOCKFILE_EXCLUSIVE_LOCK | LOCKFILE_FAIL_IMMEDIATELY, 0, std::numeric_limits<DWORD>::max(), std::numeric_limits<DWORD>::max(), &overlapped)) {
| ^
fs.cpp:123:112: error: '::max' has not been declared; did you mean 'std::max'?
123 | if (!LockFileEx(hFile, LOCKFILE_EXCLUSIVE_LOCK | LOCKFILE_FAIL_IMMEDIATELY, 0, std::numeric_limits<DWORD>::max(), std::numeric_limits<DWORD>::max(), &overlapped)) {
| ^~~
| std::max
In file included from C:/dev/msys64/mingw64/include/c++/11.2.0/bits/char_traits.h:39,
from C:/dev/msys64/mingw64/include/c++/11.2.0/string:40,
from ./fs.h:9,
from fs.cpp:5:
C:/dev/msys64/mingw64/include/c++/11.2.0/bits/stl_algobase.h:300:5: note: 'std::max' declared here
300 | max(const _Tp& __a, const _Tp& __b, _Compare __comp)
| ^~~
fs.cpp:123:124: error: 'numeric_limits' is not a member of 'std'
123 | if (!LockFileEx(hFile, LOCKFILE_EXCLUSIVE_LOCK | LOCKFILE_FAIL_IMMEDIATELY, 0, std::numeric_limits<DWORD>::max(), std::numeric_limits<DWORD>::max(), &overlapped)) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs.cpp:123:144: error: expected primary-expression before '>' token
123 | if (!LockFileEx(hFile, LOCKFILE_EXCLUSIVE_LOCK | LOCKFILE_FAIL_IMMEDIATELY, 0, std::numeric_limits<DWORD>::max(), std::numeric_limits<DWORD>::max(), &overlapped)) {
| ^
fs.cpp:123:147: error: '::max' has not been declared; did you mean 'std::max'?
123 | if (!LockFileEx(hFile, LOCKFILE_EXCLUSIVE_LOCK | LOCKFILE_FAIL_IMMEDIATELY, 0, std::numeric_limits<DWORD>::max(), std::numeric_limits<DWORD>::max(), &overlapped)) {
| ^~~
| std::max
In file included from C:/dev/msys64/mingw64/include/c++/11.2.0/bits/char_traits.h:39,
from C:/dev/msys64/mingw64/include/c++/11.2.0/string:40,
from ./fs.h:9,
from fs.cpp:5:
C:/dev/msys64/mingw64/include/c++/11.2.0/bits/stl_algobase.h:300:5: note: 'std::max' declared here
300 | max(const _Tp& __a, const _Tp& __b, _Compare __comp)
| ^~~
```
It appears that `std::numeric_limits<T>::max` is used without the `limits` header being included. Probably on other STL implementations it's included transitively, but not in the one in MinGW. Including it fixes the compilation problem.
Environment:
OS: Windows 10
Compiler: gcc 11.2.0
Qt: 5.15.2 (included in msys2)
Using the latest mingw w64 shipped with msys2.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 077a875d94 - Thanks.
hebasto:
ACK 077a875d94
Tree-SHA512: 2289cb72fa3a28470f4250833be66079482d1392189b1e4679330dad109a8ae67b1d6d51cb635dbc1947c00c6c4cfbc4d7c9ae02269b932cfa1475583adaf73d
fa38d98aa9 doc: Add note on deleting past-EOL release branches (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This is being done for years now, but wasn't documented.
Some reasons to do it:
* Backports to those branches are unlikely to be tested both on CI (since it is often fragile and broken for stale branches) and by users (since those users likely don't exist). If a user exists, they are better off backporting any fixes they need from the last still-supported branch and test them on their own infrastructure.
* Community support of those branches is still possible, though this will need to be done in another project to relieve the burden on this project.
* All release tags will remain, so no historic code is lost.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK fa38d98aa9
fanquake:
ACK fa38d98aa9 - I think this is fine as-is.
Tree-SHA512: caa714af541a6902925c89cc6a896b125f61bd77e901c5d384d84b34def2ee654bdae9f3e995001154c29672f60d2b689d0ff92d345666564fd5aa321a5b3fe7
e8692cf2c1 ci: Improve vcpkg binary cache settings (Hennadii Stepanov)
b00646bc77 ci, refactor: Rename VCPKG_TAG variable and vcpkg_cache script (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
On master (c8bae2be34), the size of the vcpkg binary cache is potentially unbounded.
The reason of such behavior is the internal caching logic, following which, any change in the [set of parameters](https://vcpkg.io/en/docs/users/binarycaching.html#implementation-notes-internal-details-subject-to-change-without-notice) defined by the vcpkg implementation will cause compiling of a new binaries following by adding them to the current cache.
This PR defines two obvious cases when the vcpkg binary cache will be invalidated.
ACKs for top commit:
sipsorcery:
ACK e8692cf2c1.
Tree-SHA512: 125312b9b90a9f932702ae3a8c0ed9939fca73feb92b5cdd2ebff181ae7ac50a17f8956ff11dc115da05f79030a1b56decfa25b26e37faf3505a1f30ddd8a80f
